Political Forums  

Go Back   Defending The Truth Political Forum > Political Issues > Abortion

Abortion Abortion Forum - A complex ethical, moral, philosophical, biological, and legal issue


Thanks Tree2Thanks
  • 1 Post By GluteusMaximus
  • 1 Post By GluteusMaximus
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old May 29th, 2018, 02:42 AM   #1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: East Coast Of U.S.A.
Posts: 167
Blame Abortion On John Marshall’s Judicial Activism

This article is a bit too profound for an average bumpkin like me:

. . . I should note that as used here, the phrase “judicial activism” is the antonym of “originalism,” not the antonym of “judicial restraint.” It doesn’t mean an inclination (rather than a hesitancy) to overrule the actions of elected officials or the decisions of previous courts. Instead, activism means the interpretation of the Constitution, on questions where its original meaning is clear, in a sense deliberately contrary to that meaning so as to obtain a result favored by the judge.
Madison v. Marshall
By Karl Spence
May 28th, 2018

https://amgreatness.com/2018/05/28/t...ea-a-backbone/
As I understand it the SCOTUS starts by telling Americans they must eat ice cream well-knowing that lawmakers and bureaucrats will quickly tell Americans which flavor of ice cream they must eat. Example: The High Court decriminalized abortion well-knowing that taxpayers must pay for those abortions. That is how judicial activism works in Socialism’s America.
Flanders111 is offline  
Old May 29th, 2018, 03:47 AM   #2
PragmaticBastard
 
GluteusMaximus's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 464
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flanders111 View Post
This article is a bit too profound for an average bumpkin like me:

. . . I should note that as used here, the phrase “judicial activism” is the antonym of “originalism,” not the antonym of “judicial restraint.” It doesn’t mean an inclination (rather than a hesitancy) to overrule the actions of elected officials or the decisions of previous courts. Instead, activism means the interpretation of the Constitution, on questions where its original meaning is clear, in a sense deliberately contrary to that meaning so as to obtain a result favored by the judge.
Madison v. Marshall
By Karl Spence
May 28th, 2018

https://amgreatness.com/2018/05/28/t...ea-a-backbone/
As I understand it the SCOTUS starts by telling Americans they must eat ice cream well-knowing that lawmakers and bureaucrats will quickly tell Americans which flavor of ice cream they must eat. Example: The High Court decriminalized abortion well-knowing that taxpayers must pay for those abortions. That is how judicial activism works in Socialism’s America.
LOL, ridiculous rightwing tripe.
Thanks from RNG

Last edited by GluteusMaximus; May 29th, 2018 at 03:52 AM.
GluteusMaximus is offline  
Old May 29th, 2018, 05:06 AM   #3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: East Coast Of U.S.A.
Posts: 167
Quote:
Originally Posted by GluteusMaximus View Post
LOL, ridiculous rightwing tripe.
To GluteusMaximus: Another snappy retort from a baby butcher who cannot hear the screams.

A long time I asked myself what inhuman pain I would have felt while I was being torn apart had my mother aborted me. I still cry knowing that no one hears the screams of a fetus while it is being torn to pieces more methodically than animals tear apart a prey.

Incidentally, science gave us so much unnecessary brutality, the least scientists can do is find a way to record the screams of a fetus so liberals can hear them.

Thankfully, there is:


. . . a signal of true moral change, driven by people who increasingly understand that abortion is not solely a woman's choice, but rather, it is the denial of the right to life of the child within her.

Most importantly, it signifies an opportunity to save our national soul in regard to the now legal mass murder of the unborn – a soul we did not willingly give, but was stolen from us decades ago.
May 29, 2018
As Ireland Aborts Its Soul, America Seems Poised to Salvage Its Own
By William Sullivan

https://www.americanthinker.com/arti...e_its_own.html
Flanders111 is offline  
Old June 1st, 2018, 07:53 AM   #4
PragmaticBastard
 
GluteusMaximus's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 464
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flanders111 View Post
To GluteusMaximus: Another snappy retort from a baby butcher who cannot hear the screams.

A long time I asked myself what inhuman pain I would have felt while I was being torn apart had my mother aborted me. I still cry knowing that no one hears the screams of a fetus while it is being torn to pieces more methodically than animals tear apart a prey.

Incidentally, science gave us so much unnecessary brutality, the least scientists can do is find a way to record the screams of a fetus so liberals can hear them.

Thankfully, there is:


. . . a signal of true moral change, driven by people who increasingly understand that abortion is not solely a woman's choice, but rather, it is the denial of the right to life of the child within her.

Most importantly, it signifies an opportunity to save our national soul in regard to the now legal mass murder of the unborn – a soul we did not willingly give, but was stolen from us decades ago.
May 29, 2018
As Ireland Aborts Its Soul, America Seems Poised to Salvage Its Own
By William Sullivan

https://www.americanthinker.com/arti...e_its_own.html
You are an extremist who thinks women are just baby making machines. You want to FORCE women to have babies whether or not it's in their best interests. You have no problem using governmental power to force behavior that you think is desirable.

Since you are proclaiming your pseudo "religious" status, why don't you show me in the Bible where abortion is condemned? Why don't you offer a rebuttal on my thread that PROVES THE BIBLE IS PRO ABORTION?

You won't, because you can't defend your beliefs. You are not a true christian otherwise you'd know abortion isn't a "christian issue". Ipso facto, that makes you a "hypocrite", a phony christian on par with the evangelical Republicans in the USA.

I commend Ireland for throwing off the shackles of the backward Catholic Church. No doubt the Church will miss all the money it made confiscating babies from unwed mothers and selling them to desperate childless couples.
Thanks from RNG

Last edited by GluteusMaximus; June 1st, 2018 at 08:13 AM.
GluteusMaximus is offline  
Old June 3rd, 2018, 03:45 AM   #5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: East Coast Of U.S.A.
Posts: 167
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flanders111 View Post
As I understand it the SCOTUS starts by telling Americans they must eat ice cream well-knowing that lawmakers and bureaucrats will quickly tell Americans which flavor of ice cream they must eat. Example: The High Court decriminalized abortion well-knowing that taxpayers must pay for those abortions. That is how judicial activism works in Socialism’s America.
Socialists/Communists love judicial activism when it works for them. Baby butchers will go out of their minds if judicial activism comes down on the side of the angels in this ruling:

“It’s quite possible that the request has provoked dueling opinions from across the bench that are not just dueling in substance, but whether the Supreme Court should be addressing it in the first place,” said Steve Vladeck, a professor at the University of Texas at Austin School of Law, who argued a case before the justices earlier in the term.
Delayed abortion case fuels intrigue at Supreme Court
By Lydia Wheeler - 06/03/18 06:00 AM EDT

http://thehill.com/regulation/court-...-supreme-court
Flanders111 is offline  
Old June 3rd, 2018, 06:22 AM   #6
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: massachusetts
Posts: 11,167
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flanders111 View Post
This article is a bit too profound for an average bumpkin like me:

. . . I should note that as used here, the phrase “judicial activism” is the antonym of “originalism,” not the antonym of “judicial restraint.” It doesn’t mean an inclination (rather than a hesitancy) to overrule the actions of elected officials or the decisions of previous courts. Instead, activism means the interpretation of the Constitution, on questions where its original meaning is clear, in a sense deliberately contrary to that meaning so as to obtain a result favored by the judge.
Madison v. Marshall
By Karl Spence
May 28th, 2018

https://amgreatness.com/2018/05/28/t...ea-a-backbone/
As I understand it the SCOTUS starts by telling Americans they must eat ice cream well-knowing that lawmakers and bureaucrats will quickly tell Americans which flavor of ice cream they must eat. Example: The High Court decriminalized abortion well-knowing that taxpayers must pay for those abortions. That is how judicial activism works in Socialism’s America.
That article can be summed up as "nonsense aimed at morons".

If you weren't a moron, you'd figure it out.

hint: linking to an article on Trump and Korea to bolster an abortion argument solidifies your moron cred.....

Last edited by goober; June 3rd, 2018 at 06:24 AM.
goober is offline  
Reply

  Defending The Truth Political Forum > Political Issues > Abortion

Tags
abortion, activism, blame, john, judicial, marshall’s



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
U.S. District Judge John D. Bates engages in judicial tyranny over DACA! johnwk Current Events 7 April 26th, 2018 07:54 AM
More Judicial activism! Sensible Current Events 52 January 14th, 2018 05:43 AM
Let's talk about REAL "Judicial Activism" Nwolfe35 Gay and Lesbian Rights 62 January 14th, 2016 03:14 AM
State Rep Suggests Abortion Is To Blame For California Drought LongWinded Current Events 13 June 13th, 2015 02:17 PM
CT Gov. denounces judicial activism on homosexual marriage garysher Gay and Lesbian Rights 166 October 18th, 2008 03:31 AM


Facebook Twitter RSS Feed



Copyright © 2005-2013 Defending The Truth. All rights reserved.