Political Forums  

Go Back   Defending The Truth Political Forum > Political Forum > Political Talk > Americas

View Poll Results: Agree or disagree with the statement in the original post?
Agree! 3 75.00%
Disagree! 1 25.00%
Voters: 4. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old May 14th, 2011, 11:50 AM   #1
An Awesome Dude
 
Dude111's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location:
Posts: 3,286
"Each citizen should have the right to define what liberty means to them and to exersize this definition so long as it does not directly restrict other citizens from doing the same."



in other words



"A person should be free to do as they please so long as it does not directly restrict others from doing as they please as well."



Why do you agree or disagree with the statement?



If you agree,heres some sites you cant afford to miss!



http://www.theadvocates.org



http://www.thelibertycommittee.org
Dude111 is offline  
Old May 15th, 2011, 07:37 AM   #2
Senior Member
 
Catus Felidae's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,665
This is an impossible situation.



If I wish to play my music very loud at night but my neighbor wishes to sleep, whose choice wins?


Catus Felidae is offline  
Old May 15th, 2011, 09:33 AM   #3
Not Believing My Eyes....
 
imaginethat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Western Slope, Colorado
Posts: 34,934
Quote:
Originally Posted by Catus Felidae View Post
This is an impossible situation.



If I wish to play my music very loud at night but my neighbor wishes to sleep, whose choice wins?




Your neighbor's.



It's a very clear requirement of Liberty to respect that my rights end where yours begin. Your loud music doesn't stop at your home's walls. If you like to play music loudly at night, that's fine, but then it becomes your responsibility to see that you do not include the neighborhood unwillingly in your desire.
imaginethat is online now  
Old May 15th, 2011, 10:33 AM   #4
Senior Member
 
Catus Felidae's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,665
Your neighbor's.



It's a very clear requirement of Liberty to respect that my rights end where yours begin. Your loud music doesn't stop at your home's walls. If you like to play music loudly at night, that's fine, but then it becomes your responsibility to see that you do not include the neighborhood unwillingly in your desire.











When you create a situation of 'I do what I want as long as it doesn't stop you from doing what you want', you're creating a conflicted situation.



I have the right to party as long as it doesn't stop my neighbor from sleeping. My neighbor has the right to sleep as long as it doesn't stop me from partying.



What if that neighbor wished to sleep during a hot August day, and my kids wanted to have friends over for a barb-a-que and pool party?

Catus Felidae is offline  
Old May 15th, 2011, 11:47 AM   #5
Your Own Moderator
 
pensacola_niceman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Lenexa, Kansas
Posts: 27,013
I'll have to remember all this when I'm back in Afghanistan and the donkeys braying on the street below start to disturb me.
pensacola_niceman is offline  
Old May 15th, 2011, 11:49 AM   #6
Your Own Moderator
 
pensacola_niceman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Lenexa, Kansas
Posts: 27,013
Also, people with dogs that bark all the time (especially when you're in your own yard) should be shot.
pensacola_niceman is offline  
Old May 15th, 2011, 11:50 AM   #7
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 11
I agree with the old saying

"My freedom ends where your starts."



But your sites have nothing to do with that.
imokay is offline  
Old May 15th, 2011, 12:33 PM   #8
Not Believing My Eyes....
 
imaginethat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Western Slope, Colorado
Posts: 34,934
Quote:
Originally Posted by Catus Felidae View Post
Your neighbor's.



It's a very clear requirement of Liberty to respect that my rights end where yours begin. Your loud music doesn't stop at your home's walls. If you like to play music loudly at night, that's fine, but then it becomes your responsibility to see that you do not include the neighborhood unwillingly in your desire.











When you create a situation of 'I do what I want as long as it doesn't stop you from doing what you want', you're creating a conflicted situation.



I have the right to party as long as it doesn't stop my neighbor from sleeping. My neighbor has the right to sleep as long as it doesn't stop me from partying.



What if that neighbor wished to sleep during a hot August day, and my kids wanted to have friends over for a barb-a-que and pool party?



That's different. If the person regularly slept during the day, then it would be her responsibility to have ear plugs or whatever worked for her.



The principle here, not well-appreciated by Americans though it's a core principle of our system of government, is property rights. Your property rights end at the edge of your property. Within the boundaries, you are the sovereign. Anything you do on your property that does not extend beyond your property is your personal right.



However, that which leaves your property, sound, light, water, odors, by definition will encroach onto another's property, and thus may violate the property rights of another. Perhaps, you and your neighbor can negotiate your encroachments, perhaps not, and if not you are the one to cease and desist.



Try it on. What if you needed to sleep at night for your job, and your neighbor, on a regular basis, not only had loud parties but they were bright as well.
imaginethat is online now  
Old May 15th, 2011, 06:41 PM   #9
Your Own Moderator
 
pensacola_niceman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Lenexa, Kansas
Posts: 27,013
Unless you live way out in the country, I don't think you have the right to keep large barking dogs. If you are in a suburb or city, you should be restricted to only small breeds that live inside your house most of the time.



pensacola_niceman is offline  
Old May 15th, 2011, 10:20 PM   #10
Senior Member
 
Catus Felidae's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,665
That's different. If the person regularly slept during the day, then it would be her responsibility to have ear plugs or whatever worked for her.



The principle here, not well-appreciated by Americans though it's a core principle of our system of government, is property rights. Your property rights end at the edge of your property. Within the boundaries, you are the sovereign. Anything you do on your property that does not extend beyond your property is your personal right.



However, that which leaves your property, sound, light, water, odors, by definition will encroach onto another's property, and thus may violate the property rights of another. Perhaps, you and your neighbor can negotiate your encroachments, perhaps not, and if not you are the one to cease and desist.



Try it on. What if you needed to sleep at night for your job, and your neighbor, on a regular basis, not only had loud parties but they were bright as well.





Exactly. That's why the proposed situation is at conflict with itself. Society has always decided whose rights shall be considered paramount. The majority of people sleep at night, therefore, the partying persons rights are limited. People who sleep during the day are a minority, so they must adapt.





Catus Felidae is offline  
Reply

  Defending The Truth Political Forum > Political Forum > Political Talk > Americas

Tags
agree, statement

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A Progressive Mission Statement-Positive Values Everyone Can Agree With skews13 Current Events 101 December 3rd, 2012 08:30 PM
Do you agree with this statement 100%? Dude111 Opinion Polls 12 December 2nd, 2009 03:25 PM
For McCain?? Then you agree with Al-Qa'ida hevusa Politicians 1 October 27th, 2008 05:47 PM
I couldn't agree more with this patriot hevusa Political Talk 31 September 26th, 2005 03:51 PM


Facebook Twitter RSS Feed



Copyright © 2005-2013 Defending The Truth. All rights reserved.