Political Forums  

Go Back   Defending The Truth Political Forum > Political Forum > Political Talk > Americas


Thanks Tree21Thanks
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old June 16th, 2017, 08:24 AM   #21
Senior Member
 
Clara007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Arizona
Posts: 6,936
Quote:
Originally Posted by RNG View Post
Do you have anything other than your dislike of the outcome to say the FBI investigation into the email thing was god-awful? And what is your legal training that allows you to disagree with experts in the field as to them changing things.

With all the hate of Clinton in the Republican party and all the resources available to them, why is it you can see these things but they can't? Maybe it's because there is nothing to see in the real world.


I could be wrong, but seems like Jim is saying the Clinton investigation isn't over?? Are the Feds still looking into her emails? Benghazi? anything else?

Didn't Comey say "CARELESS" and other adjectives....not criminal? Hilly has GOT TO BE guilty of something so.......damn the FBI and full speed ahead. Jim is leading the charge. Let's see how far he gets. One thing's for sure.
The whole Clinton thingy certainly provides great deflection when a new Trump charge pops up. LOL
Clara007 is offline  
Old June 16th, 2017, 08:45 AM   #22
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Lehigh Valley Pa.,USA
Posts: 6,633
Quote:
Originally Posted by RNG View Post
Do you have anything other than your dislike of the outcome to say the FBI investigation into the email thing was god-awful? And what is your legal training that allows you to disagree with experts in the field as to them changing things.

With all the hate of Clinton in the Republican party and all the resources available to them, why is it you can see these things but they can't? Maybe it's because there is nothing to see in the real world.
I'm not the one who is making a big deal out of a US President supposedly making an off-the wall comment to his FBI Director, that even if it were true, it did not affect a damn thing....

And those same people not being concerned with the obviously shady things that went on between James Comey, Loretta Lynch and Bill Clinton....Then we get into one target of the investigation being allowed to be a council to the main target.....destruction of laptops..What happened to the 33,000 e-mails that Hillary's lawyers deleted...bleached hard drives...Comey changing the language of a statute from negligence to intent. The FBI Director acting as Prosecutor instead of investigator.....Nothing to see here.....NOT!!
Jimgorn is offline  
Old June 16th, 2017, 08:52 AM   #23
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Lehigh Valley Pa.,USA
Posts: 6,633
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clara007 View Post
I could be wrong, but seems like Jim is saying the Clinton investigation isn't over?? Are the Feds still looking into her emails? Benghazi? anything else?

Didn't Comey say "CARELESS" and other adjectives....not criminal? Hilly has GOT TO BE guilty of something so.......damn the FBI and full speed ahead. Jim is leading the charge. Let's see how far he gets. One thing's for sure.
The whole Clinton thingy certainly provides great deflection when a new Trump charge pops up. LOL
FBI Director James Comey was the one who let the cat out of the bag when he testified that Loretta Lynch told him to us the term "Matter" instead of "investigation".. that right there should re-open the Clinton Investigation.... anybody with a half a brain could see that the FBI Investigation was an outright sham and a cover-up.....But then again we have leftroids, so what do you expect...

You knuckleheads are worried about what Trump said to Comey at dinner about Flynn.....and not one shred of proof... What a bunch of hypocrites!!
Jimgorn is offline  
Old June 16th, 2017, 10:05 AM   #24
RNG
Senior Member
 
RNG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: LA LA Land North
Posts: 25,825
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimgorn View Post
I'm not the one who is making a big deal out of a US President supposedly making an off-the wall comment to his FBI Director, that even if it were true, it did not affect a damn thing....

And those same people not being concerned with the obviously shady things that went on between James Comey, Loretta Lynch and Bill Clinton....Then we get into one target of the investigation being allowed to be a council to the main target.....destruction of laptops..What happened to the 33,000 e-mails that Hillary's lawyers deleted...bleached hard drives...Comey changing the language of a statute from negligence to intent. The FBI Director acting as Prosecutor instead of investigator.....Nothing to see here.....NOT!!
Then why haven't/don't the Republicans in power or the Republican pacs or any of those rich and resource rich organizations hammer the alleged perps? Are they really closet Democrats?

You keep avoiding this key element.
RNG is offline  
Old June 16th, 2017, 10:16 AM   #25
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Lehigh Valley Pa.,USA
Posts: 6,633
Quote:
Originally Posted by RNG View Post
Then why haven't/don't the Republicans in power or the Republican pacs or any of those rich and resource rich organizations hammer the alleged perps? Are they really closet Democrats?

You keep avoiding this key element.
It's mostly due to the timidity of the Establishment Republicans... All you have to do is say BOO!! to them and they are afraid of not winning the next election... It is one of the major reasons that Trump ended up on the scene.. A lot of Republicans were just plain fed up with the lack of aggression on the Republican side...

Of course you still have Judicial Watch which hasn't gone away....Landmark Legal Foundation is another one..
Jimgorn is offline  
Old June 16th, 2017, 11:03 AM   #26
RNG
Senior Member
 
RNG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: LA LA Land North
Posts: 25,825
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimgorn View Post
It's mostly due to the timidity of the Establishment Republicans... All you have to do is say BOO!! to them and they are afraid of not winning the next election... It is one of the major reasons that Trump ended up on the scene.. A lot of Republicans were just plain fed up with the lack of aggression on the Republican side...

Of course you still have Judicial Watch which hasn't gone away....Landmark Legal Foundation is another one..
From ridiculousness into tinfoil hat territory. Judicial Watch is a joke. But they learned very well from Orly Taitz.

Landmark is a new one to me. Some homework to do.
RNG is offline  
Old June 16th, 2017, 11:13 AM   #27
RNG
Senior Member
 
RNG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: LA LA Land North
Posts: 25,825
From the Wikipedia entry on Landmark Legal Foundation.

Quote:
In 2007 the Landmark Legal Foundation nominated commentator Rush Limbaugh, who sits as an unpaid member of its advisory board, for a Nobel Peace Prize.[5]

Donors to Landmark include the Sarah Scaife Foundation, the Charles G. Koch Charitable Foundation and ExxonMobil.[6][7]

In 2016, the director of Penn State Earth System Science Center, climatologist Michael E. Mann, named Landmark as part of an alleged smear campaign against him after his testimony on the C-SPAN TV network about the threat of human-caused climate change.[8][9]
Druggie Limbaugh for the Nobel Peace Prize.

You can't make this stuff up.
RNG is offline  
Old June 16th, 2017, 11:46 AM   #28
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Lehigh Valley Pa.,USA
Posts: 6,633
Quote:
Originally Posted by RNG View Post
From the Wikipedia entry on Landmark Legal Foundation.



Druggie Limbaugh for the Nobel Peace Prize.

You can't make this stuff up.
Landmark Legal Foundation is Mark Levin, who is about 1000 times smarter than you...
Jimgorn is offline  
Old June 16th, 2017, 11:49 AM   #29
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Lehigh Valley Pa.,USA
Posts: 6,633
Quote:
Originally Posted by RNG View Post
From ridiculousness into tinfoil hat territory. Judicial Watch is a joke. But they learned very well from Orly Taitz.
.
You asked me a question and I gave you an answer...Do you have something intelligent to refute it, or is it more important that you keep proving to me that you are a bonehead??
Jimgorn is offline  
Old June 16th, 2017, 12:28 PM   #30
RNG
Senior Member
 
RNG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: LA LA Land North
Posts: 25,825
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimgorn View Post
Landmark Legal Foundation is Mark Levin, who is about 1000 times smarter than you...
His success ratio as listed in the Wikipedia entry on the Foundation might argue that point.
RNG is offline  
Reply

  Defending The Truth Political Forum > Political Forum > Political Talk > Americas



Thread Tools
Display Modes



Facebook Twitter RSS Feed



Copyright © 2005-2013 Defending The Truth. All rights reserved.