Political Forums  

Go Back   Defending The Truth Political Forum > Political Forum > Political Talk > Americas


Thanks Tree99Thanks
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old July 27th, 2017, 10:51 AM   #41
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: In the mind of commie hippies
Posts: 38,895
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clara007 View Post

YOU'RE
wrong.

Brought to you by Grammar Girl. Jimmy thinks everything is unconstitutional. He obviously has a direct LINE to the dead founders.
You can answer the questions as well if the think the incorporation doctrine has a constitutional basis or explain what the presentment clause is.
Jimmyb is offline  
Old July 27th, 2017, 10:53 AM   #42
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: In the mind of commie hippies
Posts: 38,895
Quote:
Originally Posted by RNG View Post
It is as shown by the rulings of the SC, the real experts on constitutional matters. They got the stroke, you got the smoke. Or dirty air.
How do "real experts" have split decisions with opposite opinions and reverse other experts when nothing changes?
Thanks from caconservative and Sabcat
Jimmyb is offline  
Old July 27th, 2017, 10:55 AM   #43
Banned
 
Maverick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: RV
Posts: 129
Quote:
Originally Posted by RNG View Post
Jimmy, why do the real experts consistently rule against the way you think they should? Maybe it's you that doesn't know dick shit about the constitution.

You know less than zero about the Constitution.

And profane too.
Thanks from Jimmyb
Maverick is offline  
Old July 27th, 2017, 10:59 AM   #44
RNG
Senior Member
 
RNG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Between everywhere
Posts: 26,848
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimmyb View Post
If they had a constitutional basis why are you unable to provide the basis?
If they have no constitutional basis, why does the SC support them?
RNG is offline  
Old July 27th, 2017, 11:01 AM   #45
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: In the mind of commie hippies
Posts: 38,895
Quote:
Originally Posted by RNG View Post
If they have no constitutional basis, why does the SC support them?
Ideologically based judicial activism with no constitutional basis.
Thanks from caconservative
Jimmyb is offline  
Old July 27th, 2017, 11:03 AM   #46
Banned
 
Maverick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: RV
Posts: 129
Quote:
Originally Posted by RNG View Post
It is as shown by the rulings of the SC, the real experts on constitutional matters. They got the stroke, you got the smoke. Or dirty air.


Yeah, the same what gave us the Dred Scott decision.

You know nothing of the Constitution, other than bleating about court decisions, which this nation was never set up to be ruled by judges.
Thanks from Jimmyb
Maverick is offline  
Old July 27th, 2017, 11:03 AM   #47
RNG
Senior Member
 
RNG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Between everywhere
Posts: 26,848
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimmyb View Post
Ideologically based judicial activism with no constitutional basis.
Jimmy, Jimmy, Jimmy, you keep forgetting to add "in my totally irrelevant opinion" to your posts.
RNG is offline  
Old July 27th, 2017, 11:21 AM   #48
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: In the mind of commie hippies
Posts: 38,895
Quote:
Originally Posted by RNG View Post
Jimmy, Jimmy, Jimmy, you keep forgetting to add "in my totally irrelevant opinion" to your posts.
Let us measure irrelevance regarding the Constitution: me, which you are batting zero regarding a counter argument or a liberal Canadian who relies on Wikipedia.
Jimmyb is offline  
Old July 27th, 2017, 11:29 AM   #49
Have you seen my Iguana
 
Sabcat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Earth
Posts: 22,966
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimmyb View Post
How do "real experts" have split decisions with opposite opinions and reverse other experts when nothing changes?
Because it is a living, breathing document...duh. I believe it is female too, as it seemingly changes it's mind often.
Thanks from Jimmyb
Sabcat is offline  
Old July 27th, 2017, 11:30 AM   #50
Senior Member
 
Nwolfe35's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
Posts: 14,884
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimmyb View Post
Let us measure irrelevance regarding the Constitution: me, which you are batting zero regarding a counter argument or a liberal Canadian who relies on Wikipedia.
Yes, let's measure irrelevance regarding the Constituion, you or the literally scores of judges who have ruled against your interpretation and set up the legal precedent the courts use today.

Hmmm, I think I'll go with the judges since you couldn't be more irrelevant if you tried.
Nwolfe35 is offline  
Reply

  Defending The Truth Political Forum > Political Forum > Political Talk > Americas

Tags
collapsing, eyes, government, norms



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Venezuela Is Collapsing and the Left Is Afraid to Admit Why Sabcat Socialism 7 May 19th, 2017 04:26 AM
Trump campaign may be collapsing.😎 GhostRider Americas 15 October 8th, 2016 06:09 PM
Republican Support Collapsing In Wisconsin Clinton Leads Walker 52-40 skews13 Current Events 43 April 20th, 2015 11:42 AM
Is YOUR (Local) Infrastructure COLLAPSING? Medicine Man Current Events 6 July 14th, 2014 07:01 AM


Facebook Twitter RSS Feed



Copyright © 2005-2013 Defending The Truth. All rights reserved.