Political Forums  

Go Back   Defending The Truth Political Forum > Political Forum > Political Talk > Americas


Thanks Tree99Thanks
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old July 27th, 2017, 10:33 AM   #51
Commie Exposer
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Blefuscu
Posts: 38,895
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nwolfe35 View Post
Yes, let's measure irrelevance regarding the Constituion, you or the literally scores of judges who have ruled against your interpretation and set up the legal precedent the courts use today.

Hmmm, I think I'll go with the judges since you couldn't be more irrelevant if you tried.
Fantastic. Now provide the constitutional basis for one of your favorite liberal activist Supreme Court rulings.
Jimmyb is offline  
Old July 27th, 2017, 10:34 AM   #52
Commie Exposer
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Blefuscu
Posts: 38,895
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sabcat View Post
Because it is a living, breathing document...duh. I believe it is female too, as it seemingly changes it's mind often.
Give it a year or two and the Constitution will be transgendered.
Thanks from Sabcat
Jimmyb is offline  
Old July 27th, 2017, 10:40 AM   #53
Senior Member
 
Nwolfe35's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
Posts: 14,586
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimmyb View Post
Fantastic. Now provide the constitutional basis for one of your favorite liberal activist Supreme Court rulings.
Better yet, carry your ass into a courtroom and tell them why they're wrong and your right.

Judges on the courts are all adults and can defend their own rulings.

Go back to cooing and shitting on the chessboard Mr. Irrelevance.
Thanks from Hollywood
Nwolfe35 is offline  
Old July 27th, 2017, 10:45 AM   #54
Commie Exposer
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Blefuscu
Posts: 38,895
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nwolfe35 View Post
Better yet, carry your ass into a courtroom and tell them why they're wrong and your right.

Judges on the courts are all adults and can defend their own rulings.

Go back to cooing and shitting on the chessboard Mr. Irrelevance.
Fantastic. Now provide the constitutional basis for one of your favorite liberal activist Supreme Court rulings.
Jimmyb is offline  
Old July 27th, 2017, 10:57 AM   #55
RNG
Senior Member
 
RNG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: LA LA Land North
Posts: 25,789
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimmyb View Post
Let us measure irrelevance regarding the Constitution: me, which you are batting zero regarding a counter argument or a liberal Canadian who relies on Wikipedia.
The liar Jimmy. I haven't referenced Wikipedia once. I'm using a weapon unknown to you, logic.
Thanks from Clara007
RNG is offline  
Old July 27th, 2017, 10:57 AM   #56
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: California
Posts: 16,775
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nwolfe35 View Post
Explain how these decisions were reached in a way that is "not founded in Constitutional Law" because I say they WERE founded on Constitutionalnl Law.

The intent of the court is exactly for this. If there is a question on Constitutionaln Law they are the ones to interpret it.

What do you think th purpose of the court is?
Show us were in the Constitution the concept of "incorporation" exists, or is even hinted at. The Court is notorious for inventing subterfuges for getting around original intent and historical fact. That does not make them right. That only means they've corrupted the original intent to satisfy their decision. The Courts only function is "interpretation", not making law from the bench. If a law does not meet the Constitutional requirement it should have been kicked back to Congress to make the required adjustments. We have separation of powers for a reason. That "reason" has been undermined by the SC.
Thanks from Jimmyb
caconservative is offline  
Old July 27th, 2017, 11:00 AM   #57
Commie Exposer
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Blefuscu
Posts: 38,895
Quote:
Originally Posted by RNG View Post
The liar Jimmy. I haven't referenced Wikipedia once. I'm using a weapon unknown to you, logic.
Let us measure irrelevance regarding the Constitution: me, which you are batting zero regarding a counter argument or a liberal Canadian who relies on Wikipedia.
Jimmyb is offline  
Old July 27th, 2017, 11:00 AM   #58
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: California
Posts: 16,775
Quote:
Originally Posted by RNG View Post
The liar Jimmy. I haven't referenced Wikipedia once. I'm using a weapon unknown to you, logic.
Then logically, explain where the power to legislate has been bestowed on the SC.
Thanks from Jimmyb
caconservative is offline  
Old July 27th, 2017, 11:09 AM   #59
Senior Member
 
Nwolfe35's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
Posts: 14,586
Quote:
Originally Posted by caconservative View Post
Then logically, explain where the power to legislate has been bestowed on the SC.
Start with, Where has the SC legislated.
Nwolfe35 is offline  
Old July 27th, 2017, 11:10 AM   #60
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: California
Posts: 16,775
Over and over again we have this argument and not once has the Progressives delivered a coherent argument. In their opinion, if the Court says so, it's so. Just how inanely stupid is that?! Yet, let one SC decision go against them, and we're hearing a different story.
Thanks from Jimmyb and Sabcat
caconservative is offline  
Reply

  Defending The Truth Political Forum > Political Forum > Political Talk > Americas

Tags
collapsing, eyes, government, norms



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Venezuela Is Collapsing and the Left Is Afraid to Admit Why Sabcat Socialism 7 May 19th, 2017 03:26 AM
Trump campaign may be collapsing.😎 GhostRider Americas 15 October 8th, 2016 05:09 PM
Republican Support Collapsing In Wisconsin Clinton Leads Walker 52-40 skews13 Current Events 43 April 20th, 2015 10:42 AM
Is YOUR (Local) Infrastructure COLLAPSING? Medicine Man Current Events 6 July 14th, 2014 06:01 AM


Facebook Twitter RSS Feed



Copyright © 2005-2013 Defending The Truth. All rights reserved.