Political Forums  

Go Back   Defending The Truth Political Forum > Political Forum > Political Talk > Americas


Thanks Tree13Thanks
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old June 3rd, 2018, 06:49 AM   #11
I'm debt free
 
TNVolunteer73's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Lebanon, TN
Posts: 36,150
Quote:
Originally Posted by skews13 View Post
You left out the fact that Clinton was compelled to testify in front of a grand jury.

You also left out the fact the impeachment articles were filed by a lame duck house.

You also left out the fact he was acquitted by the Senate, thus no impeachment.

You also left out the fact no criminal charges were ever filed.

You should also add in the fact there were two special counsels that investigated Clinton. The original investigation being about the Whitewater land deal, which after a year the first special counsel found no wrong doing based on any evidence and ended his investigation.

Of which this wasn't acceptable to house republicans who then hired a second special counsel to dig up any dirt on Clinton he possibly could, and after three more years of investigating managed to dig up an affair.

To the tune of four years of investigations at a cost to tax payers of $70 million.

So Mr. Mueller still has plenty of time, and in the face of what has been discovered, which can only be described as unprecedented corruption, certainly has the mandate to continue the investigation, and it looks like he will be the only special counsel needed.
1. Clinton was not a subject of a subpoena
2. It was a civil case not a criminal case (indictment was not an issue)
3. Clinton lied under oath, (this is when the IC was charged with investigating the charges).
4. The IC found Clinton did lie under oath and obstructed justice because he paid the McDougals to lie under oath in an attempt to protect him from civil damages, and the indictment was delivered in court on 1/21/01 (after he left office), and instead of contesting the charges Clinton pleaded guilty to all charges of the indictment.
5. He was disbarred and paid a fine for the criminal charges, plus civil damages to Paula Jones in the civil case.
TNVolunteer73 is offline  
Old June 3rd, 2018, 07:14 AM   #12
Senior Member
 
skews13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: nirvana
Posts: 9,335
Quote:
Originally Posted by TNVolunteer73 View Post
1. Clinton was not a subject of a subpoena
2. It was a civil case not a criminal case (indictment was not an issue)
3. Clinton lied under oath, (this is when the IC was charged with investigating the charges).
4. The IC found Clinton did lie under oath and obstructed justice because he paid the McDougals to lie under oath in an attempt to protect him from civil damages, and the indictment was delivered in court on 1/21/01 (after he left office), and instead of contesting the charges Clinton pleaded guilty to all charges of the indictment.
5. He was disbarred and paid a fine for the criminal charges, plus civil damages to Paula Jones in the civil case.
Thanks from RNG, Clara007 and GluteusMaximus
skews13 is offline  
Old June 3rd, 2018, 07:19 AM   #13
I'm debt free
 
TNVolunteer73's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Lebanon, TN
Posts: 36,150
And the indictments from the Trump era

1. Not one for collusion
2. only 1 for lieing to the FBI (after the election
3. The Rest were indictments/convictions of people for crimes while they were contracted to the DNC and crimes committed between 2006 and 2013.

thanks for playing Goober,
TNVolunteer73 is offline  
Old June 3rd, 2018, 08:15 AM   #14
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: massachusetts
Posts: 11,107
Quote:
Originally Posted by TNVolunteer73 View Post
And the indictments from the Trump era

1. Not one for collusion
2. only 1 for lieing to the FBI (after the election
3. The Rest were indictments/convictions of people for crimes while they were contracted to the DNC and crimes committed between 2006 and 2013.

thanks for playing Goober,
You really don't have a clue do you?
goober is offline  
Old June 3rd, 2018, 08:47 AM   #15
Senior Member
 
imaginethat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Western Slope, Colorado
Posts: 60,019
Quote:
Originally Posted by TNVolunteer73 View Post
Because they cannot be indicted while in office, due to separation of powers.

You impeach Remove then the indictment can be served.

once the impeachement process has begun no pardons for those involved can be granted (that is why Clinton didn't pardon the McDougals.) and why Nixon Resigned.

Impeachment process involves ALL 3 BRANCHES OF GOVERNMENT,

1. The house impeaches
2. the Trial for Removal is done by the Senate requires 2/3 vote to remove, and the Trial of Removal is prosicuted by one of the Justices of the USSC (I cannot remember if it is the Chief Justice or a justice that is appointed by the 9)
3. NOT UNTIL removal is complete can the indictment be served.
That's your opinion. Others disagree.
imaginethat is offline  
Old June 3rd, 2018, 08:49 AM   #16
Senior Member
 
imaginethat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Western Slope, Colorado
Posts: 60,019
Quote:
Originally Posted by goober View Post
You really don't have a clue do you?
Nope. The world looks different to a person snugly wrapped in an alternative fact cocoon.
imaginethat is offline  
Old June 3rd, 2018, 09:49 AM   #17
RNG
Senior Member
 
RNG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Between everywhere
Posts: 30,219
RNG is offline  
Reply

  Defending The Truth Political Forum > Political Forum > Political Talk > Americas

Tags
lawyers, letter, mueller, president, republican



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
An Open Letter To The Republican Party skews13 Americas 13 March 26th, 2016 05:30 PM
Statement by the Vice President on the March 9 Letter From Republican Senators to the The White House The White House 0 March 10th, 2015 06:20 AM
Letter from the President -- War Powers Resolution Letter Regarding Libya The White House The White House 0 July 27th, 2014 01:00 PM
Letter from the President -- War Powers Resolution Letter regarding Iraq The White House The White House 0 July 1st, 2014 05:20 AM
Letter from the President -- War Powers Resolution Letter regarding Iraq The White House The White House 0 June 26th, 2014 11:30 AM


Facebook Twitter RSS Feed



Copyright © 2005-2013 Defending The Truth. All rights reserved.