Political Forums  

Go Back   Defending The Truth Political Forum > Political Forum > Political Talk > Americas


Thanks Tree65Thanks
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old July 3rd, 2018, 02:03 PM   #21
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: West
Posts: 331
Quote:
Originally Posted by GluteusMaximus View Post
If you want to discuss how the Bible ripped off everything from Zoroastrianism I'll be happy to school YOU
Aah, so you've decided one ancient text is better tan another. How scholarly f you.
Thanks from Sabcat and Ploughboy
Bear is offline  
Old July 3rd, 2018, 02:05 PM   #22
Senior Member
 
Ploughboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: United States
Posts: 365
Also take note what Ibn Kathir says about 2:193: It refers to the fact that the Religion of Allah (Islam) must be prevalent over other religions.

Total violation of the 1st Amendment. This means atheists would have to become muslims, too. In Islam, only Islamic doctrine rules.
Ploughboy is offline  
Old July 3rd, 2018, 02:06 PM   #23
Senior Member
 
Ploughboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: United States
Posts: 365
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bear View Post
Aah, so you've decided one ancient text is better tan another. How scholarly f you.
I would just ignore him since he's an ignorant troll who thinks he's a religious scholar but in reality just a bigot.
Ploughboy is offline  
Old July 3rd, 2018, 02:09 PM   #24
#freetommy
 
Sabcat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Earth
Posts: 27,501
Quote:
Originally Posted by skews13 View Post
No religious teachings are compatible with US law. It is why we are a secular nation, and not a religious one.
Quote:
Every religion claims that another one is the most dangerous religion in the world. Itís the worldís biggest blame game. No religion takes it upon themselves to make sure there are no violent elements within their system. They all have radical sects that they for the most part ignore, and rarely condemn. While those radical groups are extremely dangerous, the most dangerous religion in the world isnít Islam, Christianity, Hinduism, or Buddhism, itís Statism. Hereís the definition, if you didnít already know:
statism | noun | stat∑ism | \ˈstā-ˌti-zəm\ concentration of economic controls and planning in the hands of a highly centralized government often extending to government ownership of industry.

Statism is the centralization of all government power, and maximum authority over every aspect of individual life. Although, that definition leaves out the cult-like attitude many people have towards their governments. Thatís the religious part, the real dangerous part. People that worship the government and all of its violence are most dangerous of all religious people. Those are the people that are willing to kill and die for Nazism, or Communism, or other monolithic governments. Thatís what really defines statism, and makes it worse than any other religion.




https://prepareforchange.net/2017/02...-religion-in-t
Sabcat is offline  
Old July 3rd, 2018, 02:09 PM   #25
PragmaticBastard
 
GluteusMaximus's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 850
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bear View Post
True Islam is a Radical Theocracy.
Islam seems more regressive than Christianity. "Seems" being the operative word. The "christians" in the USA seem to have forgotten all the abuses heaped on mankind throughout history by the Church: conversion at swordpoint (yes, the Christians did it too), murdering "witches" over the centuries, executing gay people, medieval tortures, etc. All in the name of Baby Jesus. I'm sure he approved (assuming he existed at all).
Thanks from Camelot
GluteusMaximus is offline  
Old July 3rd, 2018, 02:10 PM   #26
PragmaticBastard
 
GluteusMaximus's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 850
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ploughboy View Post
I would just ignore him since he's an ignorant troll who thinks he's a religious scholar but in reality just a bigot.
"Realist" I think you mean. A "bigot" is somebody like yourself or the other Trumpanzees.

I noticed how you failed to address my religious question about abortion, Mr Religious Scholar. Ignorance, or cowardice?
GluteusMaximus is offline  
Old July 3rd, 2018, 02:12 PM   #27
PragmaticBastard
 
GluteusMaximus's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 850
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bear View Post
Aah, so you've decided one ancient text is better tan another. How scholarly f you.
One is original, one is derivative. So you prefer the imitation?
GluteusMaximus is offline  
Old July 3rd, 2018, 02:13 PM   #28
Senior Member
 
Ploughboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: United States
Posts: 365
Islamic law also allows the use of nuclear missiles against other nations not Islamic enough for them. This can include nuking other muslim nations that one muslim nation doesn't find Islamic enough.

Noble Qur'an 8:60,

"And make ready against them all you can of power, including steeds of war (tanks, planes, missiles, artillery) to threaten the enemy of Allah and your enemy, and others besides whom, you may not know but whom Allah does know. And whatever you shall spend in the Cause of Allah shall be repaid unto you, and you shall not be treated unjustly."

Preemptive nuclear strikes or preemptive war in general goes against U.S. policy. So this would disqualify a muslim seeking high positions in the White House, since preemptive nuclear warfare is contrary to U.S. law.

And yes, the Noble Qur'an really does say missiles. Its the best selling English Qur'an in the world with the highest marks a Qur'an can receive. It was approved by the University of Medina and the kind of Saudi Arabia.
Ploughboy is offline  
Old July 3rd, 2018, 02:14 PM   #29
Coconut Lure
 
webguy4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Michigan
Posts: 15,991
Quote:
Originally Posted by GluteusMaximus View Post
Islam seems more regressive than Christianity. "Seems" being the operative word. The "christians" in the USA seem to have forgotten all the abuses heaped on mankind throughout history by the Church: conversion at swordpoint (yes, the Christians did it too), murdering "witches" over the centuries, executing gay people, medieval tortures, etc. All in the name of Baby Jesus. I'm sure he approved (assuming he existed at all).
Conversion under threat is in conflict with scripture in Christianity. Under Islam, different story.

Look, there are lots of threads on Christianity and you are free to start your own. Why not discuss Islam on a thread about Islam?
webguy4 is offline  
Old July 3rd, 2018, 02:15 PM   #30
PragmaticBastard
 
GluteusMaximus's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 850
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ploughboy View Post
Islamic law also allows the use of nuclear missiles against other nations not Islamic enough for them. This can include nuking other muslim nations that one muslim nation doesn't find Islamic enough.

Noble Qur'an 8:60,

"And make ready against them all you can of power, including steeds of war (tanks, planes, missiles, artillery) to threaten the enemy of Allah and your enemy, and others besides whom, you may not know but whom Allah does know. And whatever you shall spend in the Cause of Allah shall be repaid unto you, and you shall not be treated unjustly."

Preemptive nuclear strikes or preemptive war in general goes against U.S. policy. So this would disqualify a muslim seeking high positions in the White House, since preemptive nuclear warfare is contrary to U.S. law.

And yes, the Noble Qur'an really does say missiles. Its the best selling English Qur'an in the world with the highest marks a Qur'an can receive. It was approved by the University of Medina and the kind of Saudi Arabia.
Wow. Those Muslims were so ahead of the time when the Koran was written they KNEW that nuclear weapons would one day have to be used against the infidels!

Religious types are hilarious. You and your sky gods For the record "missiles" referenced ARROWS, Bolts, and stones. Not Tomahawks or Sparrows
GluteusMaximus is offline  
Reply

  Defending The Truth Political Forum > Political Forum > Political Talk > Americas

Tags
compatible, islamic, law, teachings



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Islamic State Product of Islamic Heritage excalibur Current Events 0 March 10th, 2015 11:19 AM
ISIL is not Islamic sgtdmski Current Events 192 September 20th, 2014 04:10 PM
You Should Seek the Way to Be Compatible with Christ work in just ways Christianity 0 July 28th, 2014 10:03 PM
Teachings Of Christianity Vs Obama Tony Perkins Christianity 18 February 6th, 2012 03:56 PM
Islamic Tolerance leighredf Islam 50 November 12th, 2010 11:52 AM


Facebook Twitter RSS Feed



Copyright © 2005-2013 Defending The Truth. All rights reserved.