Political Forums  

Go Back   Defending The Truth Political Forum > Political Forum > Conspiracy Theories

Conspiracy Theories Political Conspiracy Theory Forum - Discuss your theories about major political events


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old April 29th, 2011, 10:54 AM   #1
Eyes Wide Open
 
waitingtables's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: NJ
Posts: 44,991
Check this out. I wasn't aware of actual movements based on this anti-feminsm philosophy. What do you all think about it, after you read the stuff here:



http://whiteprideforever.com/antifem...-civilization/







Quote:



The author goes so far as to state that “the destruction of the two-parent family by incentivizing immoral behavior in women is at least as much of a threat to American safety and prosperity as anything that ever could have come out of Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iran, or Saudi Arabia.” And you know what? I absolutely agree. The Misandry Bubble author is well ahead of the curve and does an outstanding job of analyzing current social, economic, and demographic trends — and their implications on the future of our civilization. While some parts of the article — such as the section on the Venusian Arts — were rather unnecessary, the overall essay was nothing short of superb.



Be sure to refer to The Misandry Bubble article whenever confronted by some yuppie feminist whining about the “Peter Pan Syndrome” or wondering where all the good men have gone. As there no longer exists much of an incentive for men to work hard, play by the rules, and support the system, many men of my generation have elected to “fade from view” as The Ghost Nation author eloquently stated.



To quote The Misandry Bubble author one more time:


“Women have a tremendous amount to lose by creating a lot of indifferent men.”





Indifferent may be the understatement of the millennium, but the point should be clear. You made your bed, feminists, and you will soon lie in it. Within my lifetime, there will be substantial backlash as the pendulum swings powerfully in the opposite direction. You can bet on it. The existing system is unsustainable.



I would also like to point out that the photo of women in burqas is not a prediction that the growing backlash against women’s liberation will absolutely manifest itself as a rapid Islamification of the West. This scenario may or may not play out — and based on varying demographics, North America’s societal future might be vastly different than Europe’s. In any event, major societal changes are in the wind for the entire feminized world, where the men have gotten a raw deal and are increasingly fed-up with the overall situation. Whether the inevitable changes result from open rebellion (less likely) or from deteriorating economic conditions in which feminism could no longer thrive (more likely), the sun is about to set on women’s liberation, hopefully once and for all. The burqa is a universally-recognized symbol of systematically-imposed restriction on women’s hypergamous nature — which, if unrestrained, is capable of bringing an entire civilization to its knees, as we are experiencing today.



My ideal civilization would be a hybrid model, combining the monogamous culture of 1950s America with the restrictive sexual environment seen in the Muslim world. In today’s technologically-advanced world, strict enforcement of restrictive social norms is imperative. To be sure, the successful transition to a more favorable social/sexual climate will necessitate the implementation of harsh, Muslim-esque measures; there is no other way around it. For reasons obvious, adopting the polygamous aspect of Islam would not be beneficial to our society, however. As such, a traditional, patriarchal, monogamous society would be preferable to any other alternative — especially a continuation of the status-quo.




So what is the thinking from you all on this one? Check out the site it is chock full of information.



waitingtables is offline  
Old April 29th, 2011, 10:59 AM   #2
Eyes Wide Open
 
waitingtables's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: NJ
Posts: 44,991
OMG! This one is hysterical! What a loon!





Quote:
<H1 class=entry-title>Anti-Feminism & White Pride Defined
Quote:

Posted on February 9, 2011 by Anti-Feminist The Ghost Nation, a leader in the anti-feminist movement, has posted clear and concise definitions of anti-feminism and white pride on his website. As these strict guidelines are not always followed by self-proclaimed “anti-feminists,” I feel that it is important to re-post them on this blog.


DEFINITION OF ANTI-FEMINIST:



An anti-feminist has a sincere belief in God



An anti-feminist is anti-Zionist



An anti-feminist is anti-violence



An anti-feminist does not gather or befriend others to commit crimes towards his/her enemies



An anti-feminist never knowingly makes false claims or reports about his/her enemies



An anti-feminist is honest in business



An anti-feminist is never treacherous



An anti-feminist is never two-faced



An anti-feminist is not a vulgar person



An anti-feminist is trustworthy



An anti-feminist is fair



An anti-feminist is not a misogynist or misandrist



An anti-feminist does not commit or attempt to commit blackmail or extortion



An anti-feminist rebukes not scolds feminists/Zionists in the real world



An anti-feminist is a patriot who will never condone, support or participate in false flag operations



An anti-feminist has an even temperament



An anti-feminist is not manipulative



An anti-feminist does not knowingly associate with criminals, Zionists, SADs, psychopaths or sociopaths



An anti-feminist believes the real war against terror is social



An anti-feminist is a valuable and constructive person



An anti-feminist does not pretend that hollyweird movies are real life and does not reference them as fact



An anti-feminist never believes homosexuals and bi-sexuals are enlightened



An anti-feminist is never an atheist, sadist or agnostic



An anti-feminist is anti-homosexuality



An anti-feminist believes all rectal sodomites are homosexuals



An anti-feminist is never a member of the sadistic and feminist mgtow movement



An anti-feminist does not smoke pot or use psychotropic drugs of any kind



Ant anti-feminist does not smoke cigarettes



</H1>
waitingtables is offline  
Old April 29th, 2011, 11:01 AM   #3
Eyes Wide Open
 
waitingtables's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: NJ
Posts: 44,991
And then there is this:







Quote:

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT WHITE PRIDE:
Quote:
Do all White Pride members believe in God?



Yes



Do White Pride females have tattoos?



No



Are White Pride members separatists?



I would say most are.



Do White Pride members drink alcohol?



Some do.



Do White Pride members use illicit or psychotropic drugs?




No



Do White Pride members read only from White Pride authors?



No



Is The Ghost Nation White Pride?




Many members are but it’s an anti-feminist site so all anti-feminists are welcome regardless of race.



Why does White Pride come down the hardest on White people?



Because white people should know better then to get suckered by white culture traitors.



Do you have to be Christian to be White Pride?




No, as long as you believe in God your religion is your business.



Do you have to be anti-feminist as defined by The Ghost Nation to be White Pride?



Yes



Are White Pride members mean?



No, White Pride members are the nicest people you will ever meet in your life who enjoy promoting White culture.



What do you think about about other cultures showing pride?




Go ahead and show your pride whatever race you are.



Do White Pride members listen to rap music?




Noooooooooo!!!!!



Do you have to be Anglo Saxon to be White Pride?



Of course you do.



If you are not Anglo Saxon can you define White Pride?



No



Are all White Pride males straight?



Yes



Do White Pride members think scatology is funny?



Never



The Ghost Nation and No Feminists Allowed are arguably the most hardcore anti-feminist sites that you will find online. Many MGTOW websites, on the other hand, claim to be anti-feminist while failing to adhere to the standards laid out above. Do not be fooled by their “anti-feminist” label.


waitingtables is offline  
Old April 29th, 2011, 11:18 AM   #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 8,333
Weird.....I guess it's no surprise that a white supremacist sire would be misogynist too.



Just a caution - while I didn't detect any malicious scripts on the parts of the site I browsed, I'd recommend doing it in a disposable VM. The neo-nazi sites are notorious in that regard.
skrekk is offline  
Old April 29th, 2011, 11:18 AM   #5
Eyes Wide Open
 
waitingtables's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: NJ
Posts: 44,991
Why is it that these anti-feminists are so ignorant to the facts about just how it is that women had to live, due to the restraints placed on them by male dominate patriarchal society and the thousands of years of being reduced to men's property and nothing more?



There is a reason that there are perceptions that women became all of the negative things that modern society attributes to feminism. In reality they didn't come from the feminist movement at all. It came from having to be other than what women naturally were meant to be, and forced to become something else. This anti-feminism garbage is the most ridiculous bullsh*t that I have ever read.



The men only have male dominated patriarchal society and the church to blame for what they are attributing to the feminist movement.
waitingtables is offline  
Old April 29th, 2011, 11:56 AM   #6
Senior Member
 
Catus Felidae's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,665
Quote:
Originally Posted by waitingtables View Post
Why is it that these anti-feminists are so ignorant to the facts about just how it is that women had to live, due to the restraints placed on them by male dominate patriarchal society and the thousands of years of being reduced to men's property and nothing more?




They're not ignorant of those facts WT, they just think that that's the way things are supposed to be.







As far as they are concerned, men are supposed to be in control and women are supposed to be subservient. The fact that the woman might not be happy with that arrangement simply doesn't matter.



In other words.........

It doesn't matter whether or not the cow wants to be turned into steaks; that is the purpose of the cow.
Catus Felidae is offline  
Old April 29th, 2011, 12:16 PM   #7
Senior Member
 
imaginethat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Western Slope, Colorado
Posts: 56,171
Well, according to the criteria offered, I'm neither an anti-feminist nor a White Pride member.



This term, hypergamy, is a new one for me.



Quote:
The term is often used more specifically in reference to a perceived tendency amongst human cultures for females to seek or be encouraged to pursue male suitors that are higher status than themselves, which often manifests itself as being attracted to comparatively older, wealthier or otherwise more privileged than themselves.[sup][2][/sup] Hypergamic behaviours can be explained in terms of genetic economic necessity, in which societies with high levels of gender inequality are more likely to have women who "marry-up" for the benefit of their children, and more likely to have men who "marry-down" to ensure that their mates have a higher incentive to remain faithful.






Interesting. From the wiki article quoted above: "One study found no statistical difference in the number of women or men "marrying-up" in a sample of 1109 first-time married couples in the United States." That squares with my observations. Second marriages might show some deviation.





As for this statement: "You made your bed, feminists, and you will soon lie in it." My observation, many educated, liberated younger women of my daughters' generation do not self-identify as feminists. Rightly or wrongly, they have observed and experienced my generation's phenomenon of rampant divorce and concluded, again rightly or wrongly, that their moms didn't appreciate the role of homemaker and wife.





They've experienced the results of juggling being a mom, and a career. My oldest daughter is being a homemaker and a mom, with plans to re-enter the job market afterwards. She's fortunate that she has a husband making enough money to make this an option. Many families don't have this option, but that is another discussion.





All in all, I see much more peace between the sexes than when I was younger, and this is good. However, these "White Pride" characters are trying to restart the battle. Thank goodness, they are a minority, and I know that my daughters reject many their conclusions. So do I.







imaginethat is offline  
Old April 29th, 2011, 12:42 PM   #8
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 8,333
All you feminazis have it wrong - only Pat Robertson knows the truth!

Married women abort their babies to make lesbians feel equal.
skrekk is offline  
Old April 29th, 2011, 12:56 PM   #9
Senior Member
 
Catus Felidae's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,665
Quote:
Originally Posted by skrekk View Post
All you feminazis have it wrong - only Pat Robertson knows the truth!

Married women abort their babies to make lesbians feel equal.


"lesbians can't have children". That's going to come as a surprise to several lesbians I know.



I must call them and tell them that their pregnancies and their children are figments of their imaginations.
Catus Felidae is offline  
Old April 29th, 2011, 12:58 PM   #10
Eyes Wide Open
 
waitingtables's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: NJ
Posts: 44,991
Quote:
Originally Posted by skrekk View Post
Weird.....I guess it's no surprise that a white supremacist sire would be misogynist too.



Just a caution - while I didn't detect any malicious scripts on the parts of the site I browsed, I'd recommend doing it in a disposable VM. The neo-nazi sites are notorious in that regard.


Uh oh? I don't know what you mean about disposable VM, I've never heard of that. Should I erase the links?
waitingtables is offline  
Reply

  Defending The Truth Political Forum > Political Forum > Conspiracy Theories

Tags
antifeminist, philosophy



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
My Philosophy Is...... dusty Philosophy 25 March 22nd, 2013 05:43 PM
What does philosophy do? coberst Philosophy 0 September 30th, 2009 10:38 AM
That’s philosophy for ya! coberst Philosophy 5 February 9th, 2009 02:58 AM
Islam a "feminist" religion? Nebraskaboy Islam 53 September 7th, 2006 06:17 AM


Facebook Twitter RSS Feed



Copyright © 2005-2013 Defending The Truth. All rights reserved.