Political Forums  

Go Back   Defending The Truth Political Forum > Political Forum > Conspiracy Theories

Conspiracy Theories Political Conspiracy Theory Forum - Discuss your theories about major political events


Thanks Tree9Thanks
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old October 20th, 2017, 05:59 AM   #21
Senior Member
 
tristanrobin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: New Haven, CT
Posts: 22,395
a simple google search will reveal the truth to you, my evil foul fetid little child.

Quote:
Who Wrote ‘The Diary of Anne Frank’?

Copyright law is meant to give authors and their heirs a temporary monopoly over books, songs and other creative works. In practice, however, such monopolies can last indefinitely. The latest example of this phenomenon comes from the Swiss foundation that owns the rights to “The Diary of Anne Frank.”

The foundation, the Anne Frank Fonds, is telling publishers that Otto Frank, Anne’s father, is a co-author of the book. That change will mean that the book’s copyright protection in Europe will be extended beyond the end of this year to 70 years after Mr. Frank’s death in 1980. (Anne died in a concentration camp in 1945.) The foundation will thus be able to continue collecting royalties on sales of the book in Europe for decades to come, though some critics say they are preparing a legal challenge to the foundation’s move.

Officials at the foundation argue that Mr. Frank shares authorship of the book because he edited and combined entries from his daughter’s diary and notebooks into the cohesive text that readers around the world are familiar with. A Paris-based lawyer specializing in intellectual property issues, Agnès Tricoire, told The Times that the foundation’s explanation suggests that it has “lied for years about the fact that it was only written by Anne Frank.” Critics argue that the book should be in the public domain so people can publish it without having to pay royalties to the foundation and so that other writers and artists can create derivative works based on it without permission.

The foundation is hardly the first organization to try something like this. American corporations and the heirs of writers and artists have often sought to extend their monopoly on books and other creative work and they have had plenty of help from lawmakers. The first American copyright law provided 14 years of protection with the possibility of a 14-year extension. But Congress has repeatedly increased those protections. In 1998, Congress extended copyrights to 70 years after the death of the artist and 95 years for rights held by corporations. (The American copyright on “The Diary of Anne Frank,” which is unaffected by the authorship change, will end in 2047 under current law.)

Many experts believe that media companies and the heirs of successful artists will pressure lawmakers to keep extending copyright protections. The Supreme Court cleared the path for such extensions when it ruled in 2003 that Congress did not violate the Constitution by lengthening the protections in 1998 because the extension was not indefinite. As the editorial board wrote at the time, that decision made “it likely that we are seeing the beginning of the end of public domain and the birth of copyright perpetuity.”
https://takingnote.blogs.nytimes.com...ne-frank/?_r=0

There are many other links and articles about this story; however, this one seemed to sum it all up most succinctly and briefly and in layman's language.
tristanrobin is offline  
Old October 20th, 2017, 02:25 PM   #22
Banned
 
handydude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 241
Quote:
Originally Posted by hot dragon View Post
thats what i said - you are wrong. glad you agree.

then you are stupid. stupid and wrong. not a great start to a post.


you know, threads need to degenerate to an astonishing level of dishonesty and abuse to get shut down on this site. bragging that your "debate" got "closed down" here is like bragging about how big a liar you are.


bullshit. if you had what i asked you would just post it here.


true.


false. there was not been any denial, disagreement or argument on this matter at the time. the germans admitted to it.


bullshit. you probably know this is bullshit, but there is a chance you are stupid enough to actually believe it i suppose.


because courts always achieve complete justice for all and there are never technical reasons to settle out of court.


well, this post is a good example of bullshit. you can laugh at your own words.

and finally


you do realise i dont take you seriously, dont you? you are the lowest kind of human scum, i respond to your posts for shits and giggles when i have nothing else to do. i have more respect for the dog shit i scrape off my shoe than i have for your putrid opinions.
Your crap is just too full of crap to go into very deeply. As far as the pages of quotes from the talmud that included in my thread "A racist religion," if you don't believe any of them, look them up for yourself. Also, instead expecting me to go running around like a chicken with my head cut off, how about you read those pages. If you can honestly tell me that there is nothing in them that include lying to the goyim, then I will take the time to go back and read through it again myself. But I know there is something in there along those lines.

As far as the holocaust thing, is there anything in my thread that you think is untrue? If so, speak up. Or maybe you would like to tell me some BS about how there were gas chambers.
handydude is offline  
Old October 20th, 2017, 02:39 PM   #23
Banned
 
handydude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 241
Quote:
Originally Posted by tristanrobin View Post
re: Anne Frank

there was not a dispute over the AUTHOR of the book.

there was a dispute over the rights the person who edited the diary into a more manageable publishing option had and the monetary value attached.

there has never been a question that the author of the diary was the young girl, Anne Frank.
The fact is there was a legal dispute between the author of the book and ann frank's father. When authors write books, they have a tendency to throw in some for the author to add his own flair. If everything in the book happened exactly as the diaries described, the author would have had no legal leg to stand on. As I said, when it went to court, ann frank's father lost and rather than make a big stink that would upset the allied version of history, ann frank's father settled out of court. Lastly, there has "never been any question" about most of the bullshit about Hitler or WW II in general. But that doesn't make it true.
handydude is offline  
Old October 20th, 2017, 02:43 PM   #24
Banned
 
handydude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 241
Quote:
Originally Posted by iolo View Post
The Nazis were the last possible bulwark of capitalism, which was totally discredited in Germany. That is why Hitler had to pretend to be a socialist.
In capitalism, the state doesn't take control of companies. But the Nazis did. So it isn't very accurate to call National Socialism the last bulwark of capitalism.
handydude is offline  
Old October 20th, 2017, 03:21 PM   #25
Banned
 
handydude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 241
Quote:
Originally Posted by tristanrobin View Post
a simple google search will reveal the truth to you, my evil foul fetid little child.


https://takingnote.blogs.nytimes.com...ne-frank/?_r=0

There are many other links and articles about this story; however, this one seemed to sum it all up most succinctly and briefly and in layman's language.
Such things are hard to find out through an internet that mostly expresses history as written by the victors. But as far as I could find out the diary of ann frank (the diary of a young girl) was written by Meyer Levin. There was a legal dispute over the work between him and ann frank's father. Ann frank's father lost. deal with it. You evil foul feted child.
Thanks from Pilgrim
handydude is offline  
Old October 20th, 2017, 04:24 PM   #26
Senior Member
 
tristanrobin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: New Haven, CT
Posts: 22,395
links to the evidence of same - I find nothing
tristanrobin is offline  
Reply

  Defending The Truth Political Forum > Political Forum > Conspiracy Theories

Tags
fake, holocaust



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Holocaust: What A Lie! freemind Conspiracy Theories 301 December 31st, 2015 03:29 PM
Holocaust Deniers are Actually Holocaust Minimizers Scott Conspiracy Theories 34 October 12th, 2014 09:18 PM
The Holocaust tadpole256 World History 14 May 3rd, 2009 10:27 PM
IBM and the Holocaust ClassWarrior Business & Industries 5 August 6th, 2007 02:59 PM


Facebook Twitter RSS Feed



Copyright © 2005-2013 Defending The Truth. All rights reserved.