Political Forums  

Go Back   Defending The Truth Political Forum > Political Issues > Crime and Punishment

Crime and Punishment Crime and Punishment Forum - For topics and discussions about crime, criminals, circumstances, and punishments

Thanks Tree2Thanks
  • 2 Post By foundit66
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old October 20th, 2017, 08:30 AM   #1
foundit66's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: California
Posts: 5,934
Post Judge says US govt has 'no right to rummage' through anti-Trump protest website logs

A Washington DC judge has told the US Department of Justice (DoJ) it "does not have the right to rummage" through the files of an anti-Trump protest website – and has ordered the dot-org site's hosting company to protect the identities of its users.

Chief Judge Robert E. Morin issued the revised order [PDF] Tuesday following a high-profile back and forth between the site's hosting biz DreamHost and prosecutors over what details Uncle Sam was entitled to with respect to the disruptj20.org website.

The site was used to organize public protests and demonstrations against the telly-celeb-turned-president on his inauguration day in January. A week later, following rioting and property damage, DreamHost received a grand jury subpoena demanding it hand over details of those who had created profile pages on the dot-org and any contact and payment details related to them – an order the company complied with.

Six months later, however, DreamHost received another request from the DoJ: a search request for all contact information, email content, photos, and all of the 1.3 million IP addresses of anyone who merely visited the protest website. That's a lot of people suddenly under suspicion, simply for visiting a website.

DreamHost went public with its concerns and told The Register the request was "unlike anything we've seen before in 20 years of web hosting." It refused to hand the details over, sparking a motion to compel from Uncle Sam's lawyers, which DreamHost refused.

Chief Judge Morin listened to both sides of the arguments – DreamHost claiming the demand broke the First and Fourth Amendments and was tantamount to political persecution, and the DoJ claiming it needed the information to continue its investigation into criminal acts – and decided in August that DreamHost must hand over the information, but with important caveats.

First, the DoJ was told to narrowed its search warrant to include only registered users of the website. And second, the judge introduced a "minimization plan" in which the government had to name the investigators that will have access to the data, and list the methods they will use. In addition, the court said it will oversee the search, and the DoJ must justify why it believes the information provided is "responsive to" the warrant, i.e. directly relevant to their criminal investigation.

The DoJ would not be allowed to share the information with any other government agency and the court will seal any information that it decides is "not responsive," meaning that to access it the government will need to get a court order.

This week, Judge Morin issued his final order on the matter – and it has fallen down more on the side of individual users.

"As previously observed, courts around the country have acknowledged that, in searches for electronically stored information, evidence of criminal activity will likely be intermingled with communications and other records not within the scope of the search warrant," he noted in his ruling.

"Because of the potential breadth of the government's review in this case, the warrant in its execution may implicate otherwise innocuous and constitutionally protected activity. As the Court has previously stated, while the government has the right to execute its Warrant, it does not have the right to rummage through the information contained on DreamHost's website and discover the identity of, or access communications by, individuals not participating in alleged criminal activity, particularly those persons who were engaging in protected First Amendment activities."
Judge says US govt has 'no right to rummage' through anti-Trump protest website logs ? The Register

Good reply from the judge!
Thanks from imaginethat and Hollywood
foundit66 is offline  
Old November 20th, 2017, 09:29 AM   #2
Senior Member
RNG's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Between everywhere
Posts: 29,707
Originally Posted by MyParentsAreProud View Post
These Trump hate sites should be shut down. Trump haters are evil and shouldn't be trusted around children.
Then you'd better start expanding social services right now.
RNG is offline  

  Defending The Truth Political Forum > Political Issues > Crime and Punishment

antitrump, govt, judge, logs, protest, rummage, website

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Melania Trump Website --- gone goober Americas 0 July 29th, 2016 02:43 AM
ANTI-TRUMP PROTESTERS Admit Answering Craigslist Ad and Getting Paid to Protest Trump Boo Current Events 108 April 6th, 2016 07:32 AM
Chief Steve Anderson Pens Powerful Response To Anti-Protest Rhetoric LongWinded Current Events 6 December 31st, 2014 07:13 PM
‘47 Percent Negro’: Anti-Obama Protest Turns Racist In Phoenix poet Racism 28 August 14th, 2013 03:55 PM
Judge Blasts GOP Lawmaker in Anti-Gay Petition Fraud tristanrobin Gay and Lesbian Rights 43 July 23rd, 2007 01:34 PM

Facebook Twitter RSS Feed

Copyright © 2005-2013 Defending The Truth. All rights reserved.