Political Forums  

Go Back   Defending The Truth Political Forum > Political Issues > Crime and Punishment

Crime and Punishment Crime and Punishment Forum - For topics and discussions about crime, criminals, circumstances, and punishments


Thanks Tree5Thanks
  • 1 Post By imaginethat
  • 3 Post By BubbaJones
  • 1 Post By TNVolunteer73
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old May 31st, 2018, 08:26 AM   #1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: East Coast Of U.S.A.
Posts: 145
Trump Goes Weak In The Knees —— Again

BREAKING: President Trump Will Fully Pardon Dinesh D'Souza
Katie Pavlich
Posted: May 31, 2018 9:19 AM

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiep...inesh-n2486033
If Trump had any guts he would pardon someone who would hurt him among United Nations traitors. Trump is Michael New’s last and only hope for a pardon after all of these years. U.N.-loving President Trump will have to rent a spine long enough to pardon Michael New who was court-martialed and dishonorably discharged for refusing to serve the U.N.

Trump ain’t bull crapping Sailbad the Sinner. Instead of spending his time motivational speaking at campaign rallies, Trump might devote some time learning about Michael New before he hands out pardons:



Feb. 6, 1996 note: Michael New has been dishonorably discharged in a trial that lasted about 15 minutes. An appeal is planned.

Michael New: A Patriot Court Martialed for Obeying His Oath of Duty

http://www.jefflindsay.com/MichaelNew.shtml
Nobody should be pardoned until Michael New is pardoned. New’s court-martial and conviction remains the biggest miscarriage of justice in this country’s history; on par with France’s Alfred Dreyfus.

Having to ask this question is the tragedy:


So what master do U.S. servicemen serve: the U.S. Constitution or the United Nations Charter?
Phyllis Schlafly
What Master Do U.S. Servicemen Serve?
Nov. 2, 1995

What Master Do U.S. Servicemen Serve? - Phyllis Schlafly Column 11/02/95
And this:

What if New was right all along, and the order to don the U.N. emblems was unlawful, as he argued throughout his dispute with his commanding officers at his court-martial and throughout the appeals process?

It would mean that prosecutors in the Clinton administration withheld exculpatory evidence, deceived a judge in the case and misled defense counsel to stamp out what could have been a rebellion against illegal orders to serve under the banner of the international political group.
U.S. soldiers forced to wear U.N. logo?
Appeal explains Clinton's secret executive order
Published: 05/20/2012 at 6:57 PM
by BOB UNRUH

U.S. soldiers forced to wear U.N. logo?
Bosnia was a NATO operation, but President Clinton deployed the U.S. military as United Nations peacekeepers punishing anyone refusing to serve. Michael New refused.

I have a suggestion that I posted from time to time:

Change the Universal Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) so that no American can be ordered to serve the U.N.

It is my understanding that the commander in chief can make that change without consulting Congress. Do not hold your breath until the change is made.

In the unlikely event a president loyal to this country ever does make the change it should be so ironclad that military personnel so inclined will have every Right to refuse to serve the United Nations without fear of being punished.

Michael New was court-martialed for refusing to serve the U.N. He was loyal to the United States and was punished by the Clintons. Neither Bush the Younger nor the Chicago sewer rat considered giving New a pardon.

In 2007 the U.S. Supreme Court refused to hear Michael New’s appeal. President Bush could have overturned his conviction and awarded Michael New an honorable discharge. If ever anybody deserves a pardon it is Michael New. A Bush pardon would have sent a message of hope to the American people; at least to those Americans who would defend this country against the United Nations. Even today, you never hear a media mouth compare Michael New to pardoning Marc Rich, Gitmo terrorists, and drug dealers.

NOTE: Michael New is the forbidden pardon. I doubt if he could buy a pardon for any price.

In all of the years since 1995 -1996 Michael New received very little coverage for his courageous stand. (I cannot recall one report on television then or since.) Mainstream media has been in full cover-up mode for more than 20 years. The press can always find a way to make the worst criminal a cause célèbre, while electronic media always treated New like he never existed.

And I will wager that no military recruiting officer will ever tell a prospective enlistee that he or she might be ordered to serve the United Nations. If recruiters are asked about disobeying an unlawful order, I am certain they will fudge their answer one way or another. Once you are in the military it will not matter what you were led to believe before you signed up. Refuse a direct order and your ass is mud —— unless you are a Muslim refusing to fight against Muslim brothers.

My advice to young Americans thinking about a career in the military is for them to get a legal document, signed by the president, stating that they will not be punished if they refuse to serve the United Nations Sadly, the only way giving this issue the importance it deserves is for conscription to be considered again.

A simpler way to make the United Nations problem disappear is to withdraw from the U.N. and let those countries so full of hatred for the U.S. stew in their own juices. You can bet they will think twice before attacking the U.S. after the U.N. goes belly up.

Lay my UCMJ suggestion on swamp creatures and you will hear so much caterwauling you will need earplugs to drown it out. They oppose a war against terrorism when it means the U.S. defending itself unilaterally, while they all favor Americans dying for the U.N.

Not one of the Democrats who opposed the war in Iraq while seeking their party’s nomination for president in 2004 ever included military U.N. peacekeeping missions in their anti-war pronouncements. John Kerry’s comments were so cleverly worded he fooled himself into thinking he had scored brownie points with voters. I remember he said: “America should never go to war because it wants to, but only when it has to.”

Most voters understood “. . . only when it has to.” would have been decided by the U.N. had Kerry won the election. Neither Kerry nor any other Democrat ever said otherwise.

Presidents can sign U.N. treaties, senators can ratify them, New World Order judges can interpret them for the U.N.’s benefit, and the press can make it all sound wonderful. None of those things will con the majority of Americans into fighting for the U.N.

In any event, Americans should only fight to defend their country against clearly-defined menaces like Islamic fundamentalism (think 9/11) and Communist expansion by force (think worldwide Communist domination) rather than being manipulated into fighting against a philosophical threat determined by liberals. When Americans do go to war, they should fight a total war and to hell with hurting the U.N.’s feelings.

Bottom line: Fight the war against Islam, but do not do it for the United Nations.

I expect U.N.-lovers are outraged knowing that most Americans do not care whenever the United Nations is attacked. The same indifference from the American people happened in Iraq in 2003 when U.N. employees, including top U.N. envoy Sergio Vieira de Mello, were killed after a truck bomb exploded outside U.N. headquarters in Baghdad.

U.N. Special Representative in Iraq, Sérgio Vieira de Mello, was killed along with 20 other U.N. employees. At the time the headlines screamed U.N. HQ Attacked in Baghdad, and variations on that theme.

U.N.-loving media liberals jumped on the bombing like bedbugs jump on a boarding house mattress. The press instinctively knew how to writeup the incident without any guidelines from the U.N.’s public relations office. At the time, I wondered how the press knew the truck bomb was aimed at U.N. personnel since a lot of journalists were known to hang around the hotel?

The sickest reporting were clips of the U.N. flag flying (“fluttering” according to one report) over the smoking ruins? Talking heads made the Canal Hotel sound like Fort McHenry. Give me a break on that one. The media did a lot of sorry things in recent decades, but that one was as sick as it gets. They truly expected the rest of us to place a hand over our hearts and sing the Star Spangled Banner to the U.N. house flag?

The United Nations is so protected by media it is impossible to nail those filthy bums for anything, but it is possible to make every U.N.-loving elected official accountable. Democrats unanimously support every piece of garbage the United Nations dumps on this country, everything from United Nations law, to open-borders, to environmental horse manure. Happily, voters still have a chance to find out how Republican wannabes running for Congress stand on the United Nations.

NOTE: Presidential pardons granted by Democrats should be a big issue in the 2020 election. Rest assured, the Democrat nominee is going to pardon every traitor in sight should Hillary Clinton & Company ever be tried and convicted for their crimes. (You can be sure the next Democrat president will pardon Beau Bergdahl.)

It did not take much courage to Trump pardon a dead guy —— especially when he got some black voters out of the deal:


WASHINGTON – For decades, the Justice Department has refused to even look at pardon applications for people no longer living, saying its scarce resources are better spent investigating cases from people "who can truly benefit from a grant of clemency."

That would seem to be bad news for champions of Jack Johnson, the former heavyweight boxing champion convicted of kidnapping in 1913 in a racially charged prosecution. He died in 1946.

President Trump could pardon him anyway.
A Trump pardon for boxer Jack Johnson would be just the third posthumous pardon in history
Gregory Korte, USA TODAY Published 3:12 p.m. ET April 25, 2018 | Updated 11:01 a.m. ET April 26, 2018

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...ory/539030002/
My greatest fear is that a Democrat will pardon all of those dead traitors like Alger Hiss and the Rosenbergs. Frankly, I would not put it past the next Democrat traitor in the White House clearing Benedict Arnold’s name posthumously.

Lets not forget Marine Lt. Col. William Richard Higgins:


In light of his sensitive position, Higgins' assignment to Lebanon was "a case of gross mismanagement," former national security adviser Robert C. McFarlane said in an interview shortly after Higgins' capture in February 1988. Another high-placed Defense Department official who had dealt extensively with Higgins, called his late-1987 assignment to a U.N. peacekeeping force in Southern Lebanon "a huge security lapse . . . absolutely, colossally stupid."
He Knew Too Much, Say His Colleagues
By Frank Greve, Inquirer Washington Bureau Inquirer staff writer Marc Duvoisin contributed to this article
Posted: August 01, 1989

Archives - Philly.com
Col. Higgins was captured and hanged. Col. Higgins was an unusual case in that he was in the U.S. Marines and in a United Nations peacekeeping force. His duel loyalty was "a case of gross mismanagement," because he knew a lot about sensitive information. To the New World Order crowd there is nothing wrong with the average soldier dying for the United Nations while wearing an American military uniform.

From what I understand about Col. Higgins, he had no conflict serving the U.N. as well as serving the country in the U.S. Marines. Here is the rub. Higgins did it voluntarily. That is why the UCMJ should be amended as I suggested above.

United Nations traitors championed Higgins in an attempt to sucker Americans into believing that serving the U.N. is the same as serving the country. It was a big mistake to integrate the two beliefs.

In addition, any American who wants to serve the United Nations is free to do so, but they should not embroil the U.S. military in their political beliefs. Choose one or the other —— not both.

Once our government gets into a United Nations-POW situation the Left jumps on the opportunity to play the patriotism card, knowing that most Americans will not tolerate anyone murdering our military people. The U.N. then benefits from American anger as Americans are moved closer to believing that serving the U.S. and serving the U.N. are one and the same.
Flanders111 is offline  
Old May 31st, 2018, 08:58 AM   #2
Senior Member
 
imaginethat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Western Slope, Colorado
Posts: 60,021
Flanders, you might consider making your points in "installments." Very few are going to read these lengthy epiphanies. Just an observation, nothing more.
Thanks from Flanders111
imaginethat is offline  
Old May 31st, 2018, 09:36 AM   #3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: East Coast Of U.S.A.
Posts: 145
Quote:
Originally Posted by imaginethat View Post
Flanders, you might consider making your points in "installments." Very few are going to read these lengthy epiphanies.
To imaginethat: Experience taught me that conservatives will read them the same way they read conservative newspaper articles.

On the other hand, Lefties are afflicted with bumper sticker mentalities coupled with an absence of reading comprehension skills; so they will not read my messages regardless of the length and topic.


Quote:
Originally Posted by imaginethat View Post
Just an observation, nothing more.
To imaginethat: Thanks, but I should tell you that readership is not my thing. I am happy if one conservative reads my messages and gets something out of it. In fact, I live with a long-standing fear that liberals might learn something useful without changing their wicked ways.

Last edited by Flanders111; May 31st, 2018 at 10:39 AM.
Flanders111 is offline  
Old May 31st, 2018, 10:01 AM   #4
Senior Member
 
BubbaJones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Middle Tennessee
Posts: 7,562
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flanders111 View Post
To imaginethat: Experience taught me that conservatives will read them the same way they read conservative newspaper articles.

On the other hand, Lefties are afflicted with bumper sticker mentalities coupled with an absence of reading comprehension skills; so they will not read my messages regardless of the length and topic.
Yeah calling bullshit on that one there Flounder. Some of the conservatives on this board are notorious for posting articles with the most outrageous "I can't believe they're doing this" headlines, only to get their noses out of joint when the rest of us actually READ the articles and find out they have little, and in some cases nothing, to do with their highly misleading headlines. And then, OH MY GAWD HOW DARE WE, have the audacity to point out the particulars to the OP.
Thanks from RNG, Camelot and Hollywood
BubbaJones is offline  
Old May 31st, 2018, 01:13 PM   #5
I'm debt free
 
TNVolunteer73's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Lebanon, TN
Posts: 36,150
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flanders111 View Post
To imaginethat: Experience taught me that conservatives will read them the same way they read conservative newspaper articles.

On the other hand, Lefties are afflicted with bumper sticker mentalities coupled with an absence of reading comprehension skills; so they will not read my messages regardless of the length and topic.




To imaginethat: Thanks, but I should tell you that readership is not my thing. I am happy if one conservative reads my messages and gets something out of it. In fact, I live with a long-standing fear that liberals might learn something useful without changing their wicked ways.
Unlike many liberals we can read.

Heck Liberals cannot quote accurately without Truncating statements.

I say this as I agree with your post, the US Military Member swore to defend the Constitution, NOT the UN Charter.

Trump has shown he usually does the right thing, Like his handling of ISIS and Syria, and Russia, and NOKO and China and Immigration and Iran and Taxes, and Obamacare Mandate.

Not like Obama who didn't have the C.O.Jones to stand up anyone.
Thanks from Flanders111

Last edited by TNVolunteer73; May 31st, 2018 at 01:17 PM.
TNVolunteer73 is offline  
Old June 1st, 2018, 05:31 AM   #6
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: East Coast Of U.S.A.
Posts: 145
I never heard a president justify his pardons to the extent Trump is doing:

President Trump on Air Force One: I Might Pardon or Commute These Other People, Too
KatiePavlich
|Posted: May 31, 2018 2:00 PM

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiep...e-too-n2486108
Trump has no choice but to lay on the B.S. with a trowel hoping nobody will notice he is gutless:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flanders111 View Post
Nobody should be pardoned until Michael New is pardoned. New’s court-martial and conviction remains the biggest miscarriage of justice in this country’s history; on par with France’s Alfred Dreyfus.
Flanders111 is offline  
Old June 1st, 2018, 07:47 AM   #7
PragmaticBastard
 
GluteusMaximus's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 348
Trump is a weak, insecure blowhard.
GluteusMaximus is offline  
Old June 8th, 2018, 10:00 PM   #8
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: East Coast Of U.S.A.
Posts: 145
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flanders111 View Post
Nobody should be pardoned until Michael New is pardoned. New’s court-martial and conviction remains the biggest miscarriage of justice in this country’s history; on par with France’s Alfred Dreyfus.
Micheal New stood for the Constitution; so asshole should ask me:

VIDEO ▼


Trump to kneeling athletes: Tell me who I should pardon | On Air Videos | Fox News
Flanders111 is offline  
Reply

  Defending The Truth Political Forum > Political Issues > Crime and Punishment

Tags
knees, trump, weak



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
‘Europe, Rise from Your Knees or You’ll Be Crying over Your Children Every Day’ Fargo Current Events 0 June 4th, 2017 08:26 PM
Trump has succeeded in brainwashing the weak GhostRider Americas 7 February 28th, 2017 11:38 AM
Keep taking those knees. roastpork Sports 7 October 7th, 2016 05:27 AM
Syrian Rebels Line Up ISIS Prisoners, Force Them to Knees, Then.... imaginethat Current Events 42 December 13th, 2015 03:41 PM


Facebook Twitter RSS Feed



Copyright © 2005-2013 Defending The Truth. All rights reserved.