Defending The Truth Political Forum

Defending The Truth Political Forum (http://defendingthetruth.com/political-forums.php)
-   Current Events (http://defendingthetruth.com/current-events/)
-   -   Will it work, Republicans say Senate pass a budget or NO PAY. (http://defendingthetruth.com/current-events/23670-will-work-republicans-say-senate-pass-budget-no-pay.html)

TNVolunteer73 January 21st, 2013 05:30 PM



Will it work?*


*


http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews...-budget-no-pay


*


*


Is it a good Idea?


*


The house has passed budgets for the last 2 years.** Senate has done nothing.**


*


If you did not do your job would you get paid?

sovereignman January 22nd, 2013 07:41 AM



ummm.....i don't think the senate knows what a budget is

Tyler Cornwall January 23rd, 2013 09:01 PM

It should be that way for both houses every time. If you don't do the job your paid to do you dont deserve the pay.

TNVolunteer73 January 23rd, 2013 09:45 PM

<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="tylercornwall" data-cid="457329" data-time="1359007280">It should be that way for both houses every time. If you don't do the job your paid to do you dont deserve the pay.</blockquote>


The* house passed a Budget in 2011 that Covered the last 8 months of* FY 2011,* They also passed a Budget for 2012 that*same month,** They also passed a Budgt last Febuary for FY 2013..


*


All of Which were never considered in the Senate.


*


You see the Senate should have done 1 of 3 things if the Senate had done it's job..***


*


1. Pass the Budgets as received from the house (this is rarely done)


*


2.*Debated the Budget for up to 60*hours* Amended the Budget and passed the Amended Budget, this would have forced*a Conference Committee and the committee would have*negotiated solutions to the differences in the 2 budget and made a compromise budget (the process would then start over house and senate would have to consider the Compromise budget and voted up or down).


*


3. Voted*down the house Budget and this would*have forced a*Conference Committee to negotiate a compromise budget (then the compromise budget would then go*both houses for consideration).

Indy772012 January 23rd, 2013 09:56 PM

<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="TNVolunteer73" data-cid="457338" data-time="1359009905"><blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="tylercornwall" data-cid="457329" data-time="1359007280">It should be that way for both houses every time. If you don't do the job your paid to do you dont deserve the pay.</blockquote>


The* house passed a Budget in 2011 that Covered the last 8 months of* FY 2011,* They also passed a Budget for 2012 that*same month,** They also passed a Budgt last Febuary for FY 2013..


*


All of Which were never considered in the Senate.


*


You see the Senate should have done 1 of 3 things if the Senate had done it's job..***


*


1. Pass the Budgets as received from the house (this is rarely done)


*


2.*Debated the Budget for up to 60*hours* Amended the Budget and passed the Amended Budget, this would have forced*a Conference Committee and the committee would have*negotiated solutions to the differences in the 2 budget and made a compromise budget (the process would then start over house and senate would have to consider the Compromise budget and voted up or down).


*


3. Voted*down the house Budget and this would*have forced a*Conference Committee to negotiate a compromise budget (then the compromise budget would then go*both houses for consideration).</blockquote>


4. Fire Reid and replace him with less biased monkey.

TNVolunteer73 January 23rd, 2013 10:53 PM

<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Indy772012" data-cid="457341" data-time="1359010613"><blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="TNVolunteer73" data-cid="457338" data-time="1359009905">
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="tylercornwall" data-cid="457329" data-time="1359007280">It should be that way for both houses every time. If you don't do the job your paid to do you dont deserve the pay.</blockquote>


The* house passed a Budget in 2011 that Covered the last 8 months of* FY 2011,* They also passed a Budget for 2012 that*same month,** They also passed a Budgt last Febuary for FY 2013..


*


All of Which were never considered in the Senate.


*


You see the Senate should have done 1 of 3 things if the Senate had done it's job..***


*


1. Pass the Budgets as received from the house (this is rarely done)


*


2.*Debated the Budget for up to 60*hours* Amended the Budget and passed the Amended Budget, this would have forced*a Conference Committee and the committee would have*negotiated solutions to the differences in the 2 budget and made a compromise budget (the process would then start over house and senate would have to consider the Compromise budget and voted up or down).


*


3. Voted*down the house Budget and this would*have forced a*Conference Committee to negotiate a compromise budget (then the compromise budget would then go*both houses for consideration).
</blockquote>


4. Fire Reid and replace him with less biased monkey.</blockquote>


wouldn't that be redundant?*

Podium Pentothal January 24th, 2013 12:57 AM



I think it is a good idea.


*


Not only would I dock their pay, but I would also pull all benefits such as their Cadillac health care program too.* No expense account, no pay for their assistants, no nothing.* Let them go on Medicare / ObamaCare / Soylent Green Care.


*


Democrats will hate this to no end.* Forcing them to produce a budget will force them to reveal what they really want.* And the last thing in the world they want is being forced to reveal their true colors.

webguy4 January 25th, 2013 09:55 PM

<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Podium Pentothal" data-cid="457420" data-time="1359021462">I think it is a good idea.


*


Not only would I dock their pay, but I would also pull all benefits such as their Cadillac health care program too.* No expense account, no pay for their assistants, no nothing.* Let them go on Medicare / ObamaCare / Soylent Green Care.


*


Democrats will hate this to no end.* Forcing them to produce a budget will force them to reveal what they really want.* And the last thing in the world they want is being forced to reveal their true colors.</blockquote>


ditto

Podium Pentothal January 26th, 2013 01:12 AM



Rather than docking their pay, Iíd like to see the Sergeant At Arms arrest Harry Reid right on the Senate floor.* Haul his ass off to jail for breaking the law.


*


Technically, proposing a budget is not required by Federal Law but by rules enacted by Congress to govern themselves.* So Harry Reid is merely only breaking the rules Congress put on itself.* Trouble is, they didnít attach any punishment to those breaking the rules.* Itís sort of like a country club that enacts their own rule of, ďno shoes, no shirt, no serviceĒ.* If Harry Reid walks into the clubhouse in nothing but his underwear which jail to you take him to?* There is none.


*


But still, itís more fun to say Reid is breaking the law.* We quit paying attention to the finer points a long time ago.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:28 PM.


Copyright © 2005-2013 Defending The Truth. All rights reserved.