Political Forums  

Go Back   Defending The Truth Political Forum > Political Forum > Current Events

Current Events Current Events Forum - Latest political news and events


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old October 11th, 2013, 07:35 AM   #1
Banned
 
Uncle Han's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: HK
Posts: 1,233
Liberal Child Abuse

Liberal Child Rape and Abuse

By Tom Trinko
A key moment so far in the shutdown drama was when Harry Reid, the liberal Democrat head of the Senate, stated that he didn't care if children with cancer missed out on medical care.

While this shocked many, the simple fact is that liberals tend to be very much unconcerned about children. After all, liberals are keen supporters of killing children before they're born, and sometimes even after, so the thought that liberals are more concerned with their own political power than with children shouldn't be surprising.

Historically, liberals talk a good game about children -- using them to justify bigger government and more power for liberals over our lives -- but they don't ever walk the walk. Aside from having far fewer children than conservatives -- witness the concern about the "birth gap" -- liberals are also very big fans of abortion, which always kills a child, and they tend to lean towards prioritizing career over parenting.


During the 1970s, it became obvious that the massive welfare state the liberals loved was destroying the black family by incentivizing single parenthood, yet liberals fought tooth and nail to continue the system, even though it was obviously hurting black children. Really caring about children means working to ensure that they can grow up in an intact family or at the very least not encouraging the breakup of families.

Similarly, today, inner-city schools are providing execrable education for children, but liberals actively work to shut down alternatives. Really caring about the children means wanting to ensure that they get a good education.

Now this doesn't mean that liberals don't love their own children, but it does mean that liberals are comfortable with solutions that benefit themselves over future generations -- for what is abortion in more than 98% of cases other than saying that it's okay to kill your own child to improve your future?


That's why conservatives are concerned about the ever growing national debt while liberals aren't. Liberals don't mind socking future Americans with the bill for the liberal lifestyle -- buying votes with government dollars.


The simple fact is that with a $17,000,000,000,000 national debt, our children and our children's children will be paying it off. Essentially, every time we raise the debt ceiling, we're borrowing money from our children -- breaking into their piggy banks and taking their wages to enhance our lifestyles. That's the exact opposite of what people who love children do. When you love children, you sacrifice your own lifestyle to improve theirs.

When an adult borrows money, he does so with the idea that he will pay it back and will suffer the loss of buying power associated with the interest on the loan. But when government borrows money, the people who will pay may not even have been born who will end up paying the price.

If the debt is "paid" off by inflation, then it will rest not only on our children, but mostly on the children of the poor. It would be hard to imagine a more regressive tax than inflation. When inflation occurs, the poor lose the ability to buy necessities while the rich lose their ability to buy some luxuries.

But the liberal desire to live high on the hog with other people's children's money does not stop with the debt. Nor does their intergenerational theft.


We've seen this before with Social Security. From the beginning, the Democrats viewed it as a massive scheme to transfer wealth from the young to the old, which is why people began receiving benefits even though they hadn't paid into the system for very long, (less than four years) when Social Security started.

Right now, we're seeing how the young have to subsidize Social Security for the elderly while being fairly sure that they themselves will never see a dime since the system simply becomes unsustainable by the time today's youth will retire -- as is the case with all Ponzi schemes.

Stealing from your children -- or in the case of liberals with no children, other people's children -- is viewed as a form of child abuse by most Americans, as we can tell by the opprobrium heaped on the parents of child stars who swindle their own children.

A more recent example of liberal child abuse is the cause of the current political crisis: ObamaCare. ObamaCare is another act of generational theft, where the young are being required to subsidize the medical bills of the elderly.

Young people who effectively self-insured prior to ObamaCare are being forced to pay high rates so that those with pre-existing conditions and the elderly can get lower rates. This is a direct rejection of the efforts by so many elderly Americans to ensure that their medical bills will not impoverish their own children. Liberals are robbing children to reduce liberals' medical bills.

Whether it's ObamaCare, Social Security, or the national debt, the common thread is liberals working to take money from the young and use it for their own objectives.

Given that liberals have far fewer children than conservatives, the situation is even worse than it might seem at first.


Every child is a huge investment in America, costing the parents over $241,000, ignoring college expenses. While parents who love their children gladly make that sacrifice, liberals who have fewer children are essentially exploiting the children of others to support the liberal big spending agenda.


While liberals are constantly demanding higher tax rates, they also refuse to allow parents to deduct the real cost of raising a child -- 18 years of tax deductions for a child amount to only 28% of the cost of raising a child. Essentially, conservatives are paying much higher taxes than liberals when one considers that the money invested in a child produces a new American taxpayer who will benefit the country more than any other government spending -- a family of three, for example, will pay taxes on an extra $28K of income per year compared to a family with no children.


Sadly, many young people have no clue how the Democrats are ripping them off. Historically, young people tend to concentrate on getting a job, starting a career, and starting a family rather than on politics. Liberals prey on that by working hard to obscure how they're abusing today's children by long-term generational theft.

It's time to stop letting liberals pretend to be charitable when the reality is that they're stealing children's money to pay for what liberals want.


It's time to point out that the "good" the liberals are claiming to do is financed with the wages of people who are too young to vote today but who will have no choice but to pay the tab run up by spendaholic liberals.


You can read more of Tom's rants at his blog, Conversations about the obvious. Feel free to follow him on Twitter.



Page Printed from: Articles: Liberal Child Abuse at October 11, 2013 - 10:32:52 AM CDT
By Tom Trinko
A key moment so far in the shutdown drama was when Harry Reid, the liberal Democrat head of the Senate, stated that he didn't care if children with cancer missed out on medical care.

While this shocked many, the simple fact is that liberals tend to be very much unconcerned about children. After all, liberals are keen supporters of killing children before they're born, and sometimes even after, so the thought that liberals are more concerned with their own political power than with children shouldn't be surprising.

Historically, liberals talk a good game about children -- using them to justify bigger government and more power for liberals over our lives -- but they don't ever walk the walk. Aside from having far fewer children than conservatives -- witness the concern about the "birth gap" -- liberals are also very big fans of abortion, which always kills a child, and they tend to lean towards prioritizing career over parenting.


During the 1970s, it became obvious that the massive welfare state the liberals loved was destroying the black family by incentivizing single parenthood, yet liberals fought tooth and nail to continue the system, even though it was obviously hurting black children. Really caring about children means working to ensure that they can grow up in an intact family or at the very least not encouraging the breakup of families.

Similarly, today, inner-city schools are providing execrable education for children, but liberals actively work to shut down alternatives. Really caring about the children means wanting to ensure that they get a good education.

Now this doesn't mean that liberals don't love their own children, but it does mean that liberals are comfortable with solutions that benefit themselves over future generations -- for what is abortion in more than 98% of cases other than saying that it's okay to kill your own child to improve your future?


That's why conservatives are concerned about the ever growing national debt while liberals aren't. Liberals don't mind socking future Americans with the bill for the liberal lifestyle -- buying votes with government dollars.


The simple fact is that with a $17,000,000,000,000 national debt, our children and our children's children will be paying it off. Essentially, every time we raise the debt ceiling, we're borrowing money from our children -- breaking into their piggy banks and taking their wages to enhance our lifestyles. That's the exact opposite of what people who love children do. When you love children, you sacrifice your own lifestyle to improve theirs.

When an adult borrows money, he does so with the idea that he will pay it back and will suffer the loss of buying power associated with the interest on the loan. But when government borrows money, the people who will pay may not even have been born who will end up paying the price.

If the debt is "paid" off by inflation, then it will rest not only on our children, but mostly on the children of the poor. It would be hard to imagine a more regressive tax than inflation. When inflation occurs, the poor lose the ability to buy necessities while the rich lose their ability to buy some luxuries.

But the liberal desire to live high on the hog with other people's children's money does not stop with the debt. Nor does their intergenerational theft.


We've seen this before with Social Security. From the beginning, the Democrats viewed it as a massive scheme to transfer wealth from the young to the old, which is why people began receiving benefits even though they hadn't paid into the system for very long, (less than four years) when Social Security started.

Right now, we're seeing how the young have to subsidize Social Security for the elderly while being fairly sure that they themselves will never see a dime since the system simply becomes unsustainable by the time today's youth will retire -- as is the case with all Ponzi schemes.

Stealing from your children -- or in the case of liberals with no children, other people's children -- is viewed as a form of child abuse by most Americans, as we can tell by the opprobrium heaped on the parents of child stars who swindle their own children.

A more recent example of liberal child abuse is the cause of the current political crisis: ObamaCare. ObamaCare is another act of generational theft, where the young are being required to subsidize the medical bills of the elderly.

Young people who effectively self-insured prior to ObamaCare are being forced to pay high rates so that those with pre-existing conditions and the elderly can get lower rates. This is a direct rejection of the efforts by so many elderly Americans to ensure that their medical bills will not impoverish their own children. Liberals are robbing children to reduce liberals' medical bills.

Whether it's ObamaCare, Social Security, or the national debt, the common thread is liberals working to take money from the young and use it for their own objectives.

Given that liberals have far fewer children than conservatives, the situation is even worse than it might seem at first.


Every child is a huge investment in America, costing the parents over $241,000, ignoring college expenses. While parents who love their children gladly make that sacrifice, liberals who have fewer children are essentially exploiting the children of others to support the liberal big spending agenda.


While liberals are constantly demanding higher tax rates, they also refuse to allow parents to deduct the real cost of raising a child -- 18 years of tax deductions for a child amount to only 28% of the cost of raising a child. Essentially, conservatives are paying much higher taxes than liberals when one considers that the money invested in a child produces a new American taxpayer who will benefit the country more than any other government spending -- a family of three, for example, will pay taxes on an extra $28K of income per year compared to a family with no children.


Sadly, many young people have no clue how the Democrats are ripping them off. Historically, young people tend to concentrate on getting a job, starting a career, and starting a family rather than on politics. Liberals prey on that by working hard to obscure how they're abusing today's children by long-term generational theft.

It's time to stop letting liberals pretend to be charitable when the reality is that they're stealing children's money to pay for what liberals want.


It's time to point out that the "good" the liberals are claiming to do is financed with the wages of people who are too young to vote today but who will have no choice but to pay the tab run up by spendaholic liberals.


You can read more of Tom's rants at his blog, Conversations about the obvious. Feel free to follow him on Twitter.



Page Printed from: Articles: Liberal Child Abuse at October 11, 2013 - 10:32:52 AM CDT
Uncle Han is offline  
Old October 11th, 2013, 07:48 AM   #2
Senior Member
 
Nwolfe35's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
Posts: 14,394
The problem with this article (and others like it) an with the people who post them is that it paints a one sided picture. The right and left would have you believe that it's the "other guys" who are the bad guys.

This isn't the case. BOTH sides want the power. BOTH sides are willing to trample the Constitution to get power, hold power and prevent anyone else from getting power.
Nwolfe35 is offline  
Old October 11th, 2013, 07:53 AM   #3
Banned
 
Uncle Han's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: HK
Posts: 1,233
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nwolfe35 View Post
The problem with this article (and others like it) an with the people who post them is that it paints a one sided picture. The right and left would have you believe that it's the "other guys" who are the bad guys.

This isn't the case. BOTH sides want the power. BOTH sides are willing to trample the Constitution to get power, hold power and prevent anyone else from getting power.
You got schooled in that other thread when you defended Odumbo about his claiming to be born in Kenya....you STFU! LOL!
Uncle Han is offline  
Old October 11th, 2013, 08:04 AM   #4
Senior Member
 
Nwolfe35's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
Posts: 14,394
Quote:
Originally Posted by Uncle Han View Post
You got schooled in that other thread when you defended Odumbo about his claiming to be born in Kenya....you STFU! LOL!
Once again your delusions are becoming apparent. You might want to talk to your Dr. about upping your meds.
Nwolfe35 is offline  
Old October 11th, 2013, 08:25 AM   #5
Sovereign Citizen
 
MustangSally's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Florida
Posts: 951
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nwolfe35 View Post
The problem with this article (and others like it) an with the people who post them is that it paints a one sided picture. The right and left would have you believe that it's the "other guys" who are the bad guys.

This isn't the case. BOTH sides want the power. BOTH sides are willing to trample the Constitution to get power, hold power and prevent anyone else from getting power.
Hmmmm, If you know this, I'm surprised I havn't seen you weighing in on the thread:
Socialism & Fascism A Melding of the Two
MustangSally is offline  
Old October 11th, 2013, 09:12 AM   #6
Banned
 
Generaloberst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: United States
Posts: 2,702
There are liberal child abusers. There are conservative child abusers.

All deserve one thing, to hang by the neck until dead.
Generaloberst is offline  
Old October 11th, 2013, 09:54 AM   #7
Banned
 
Uncle Han's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: HK
Posts: 1,233
Quote:
Originally Posted by Generaloberst View Post
There are liberal child abusers. There are conservative child abusers.

All deserve one thing, to hang by the neck until dead.
Someone from the squishy middle commenting on an article he obviously did not read.......thanks
Uncle Han is offline  
Old October 11th, 2013, 09:56 AM   #8
Banned
 
Uncle Han's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: HK
Posts: 1,233
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nwolfe35 View Post
Once again your delusions are becoming apparent. You might want to talk to your Dr. about upping your meds.
We can count on you to be unoriginal if nothing else! Well, we also count on you being ill-informed and a dishonest scumbag...
Uncle Han is offline  
Old October 11th, 2013, 09:59 AM   #9
Banned
 
Uncle Han's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: HK
Posts: 1,233
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nwolfe35 View Post
The problem with this article (and others like it) an with the people who post them is that it paints a one sided picture. The right and left would have you believe that it's the "other guys" who are the bad guys.

This isn't the case. BOTH sides want the power. BOTH sides are willing to trample the Constitution to get power, hold power and prevent anyone else from getting power.
You stupidly believe there's only 2 sides.....
Uncle Han is offline  
Old October 11th, 2013, 10:21 AM   #10
Senior Member
 
Nwolfe35's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
Posts: 14,394
Quote:
Originally Posted by Uncle Han View Post
You stupidly believe there's only 2 sides.....
Just the opposite.

There are more than two sides. It's people like you who want to blame the liberals/Democrats for all the problems while ignoring the problems caused by conservatives/Republicans that seem to think there are only 2 sides.
Nwolfe35 is offline  
Reply

  Defending The Truth Political Forum > Political Forum > Current Events

Tags
abuse, child, liberal



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
America Is A Liberal Nation. A Liberal Wins On A Liberal Message poet Current Events 0 September 12th, 2013 06:43 AM
Penn State hushed up child sex abuse allegations imaginethat Current Events 53 July 17th, 2012 07:08 AM
Abuse The Right? tyreay Freedom of Speech 1 January 21st, 2011 04:29 PM
Authorities Raid Evangelist's Compound on Suspicion of Child Porn, Abuse Cubbie Crime and Punishment 6 September 22nd, 2008 08:50 AM


Facebook Twitter RSS Feed



Copyright © 2005-2013 Defending The Truth. All rights reserved.