Political Forums  

Go Back   Defending The Truth Political Forum > Political Forum > Current Events

Current Events Current Events Forum - Latest political news and events


Thanks Tree2Thanks
  • 1 Post By RNG
  • 1 Post By RNG
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old March 11th, 2014, 05:13 PM   #1
Talent on loan from god
 
Camelot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Ohio
Posts: 25,394
Sure, Republicans are for free enterprise and less regs

Here's an another example of republican hypocrisy when it comes to free enterprise and less regulation and job creation. They are a phony crowd;

Quote:
. Tesla Stores May Be Closed After N.J. Blocks Direct Sales

Governor Chris Christie’s administration blocked Tesla Motors Inc. (TSLA), the electric-car maker that doesn’t have franchised retail dealers, from direct auto sales in a move the company said could shutter its only two stores in New Jersey.

The New Jersey Motor Vehicle Commission, which includes members of Christie’s cabinet, unanimously approved the proposal today in Trenton, delaying public comment on the matter until after the hearing. Tesla earlier today said it learned only yesterday, after months of negotiations, that the rule change was coming to the most densely populated U.S. state, which is important for reaching customers in the New York metro area.

Christie “has gone back on his word,” Tesla Chief Executive Officer Elon Musk said early today on Twitter. “His administration, under pressure from auto dealers, may shut down Tesla in NJ as soon as today.”

Tesla is battling dealers state by state to secure or protect the right to sell its cars directly to consumers. Auto dealers in Ohio, New York, Minnesota, Georgia and elsewhere in the past year have sought to block Tesla from directly retailing its models, arguing that independent retailers are better for shoppers and owners of vehicles. Texas dealers successfully backed a law setting the nation’s toughest restrictions on Tesla. Arizona, Colorado and Virginia also imposed limits.

No Surprises

The New Jersey vote shouldn’t have been a surprise to Palo Alto, California-based Tesla, said a Christie spokesman.

“Since Tesla first began operating in New Jersey one year ago, it was made clear that the company would need to engage the Legislature on a bill to establish their new direct-sales operations under New Jersey law,” said Kevin Roberts, the spokesman. “This administration does not find it appropriate to unilaterally change the way cars are sold in New Jersey without legislation and Tesla has been aware of this position since the beginning.”

On the commission with the three members of Christie’s cabinet are four gubernatorial appointees. The panel is led by non-voting Chairman Raymond Martinez, who was appointed by Christie, a Republican, in February 2010.

Tesla should either adjust its business model to conform with New Jersey law or seek changes to it, said James Appleton, president of the state’s dealer association.

New Jersey’s “statute is on the books to protect consumers,” he said, while “Tesla’s business model crushes competition.”

Tesla slipped 1.9 percent to $234.41 at the close in New York, the third consecutive decline for the shares that have risen 56 percent this year.

‘Bad Faith’

“A decision was made rather abruptly and certainly without any consultation with us,” Diarmuid O’Connell, Tesla’s vice president of business development, said in a conference call before the commission met. “There are probably a couple levels of bad faith and surreptitious behavior.”

The New Jersey Commission’s vote came the same day Tesla officials met in Ohio with representatives of auto dealers to seek a compromise on a bill in a Senate committee to force Tesla to use franchise dealers if it wants more sales points in the Buckeye State.

“We’re still negotiating,” said Senator Scott Oelslager, a Republican who is chairman of the committee.

The Senate panel accepted written testimony from General Motors Co. opposing any additional dealer licenses for Tesla beyond the two for stores in Columbus and Cincinnati.

“Tesla is an automobile manufacturer, they compete with our vehicles in the market, and they should compete under the same laws we do,” the Detroit-based company said.

‘Big Business’

The maker of Model S cars that start at $71,000 has already begun talks with New Jersey lawmakers about amending the state’s law and will also consider options including litigation, said Jonathan Chang, a lawyer for the automaker. Tesla’s stores in the state are at the Mall at Short Hills and at the Garden State Plaza in Paramus.

“New Jersey is one of our larger markets for Model S and so it’s an important market for us,” he said. “But really, any market is an important market for us.”

After the decision, 14 people including Chang and Appleton spoke. The crowd of about three-dozen people was weighted in favor of Tesla supporters, with many standing up to tell stories of excellent customer service.

Thomas Moloughney, 47, of Chester, New Jersey, who said he doesn’t own a Tesla or stock in the company, attended the hearing as an aficionado of electric cars.

“This board acted purely in the interests of big business and the dealerships, but they left the people of New Jersey behind,” said Moloughney, owner of Bella Casa, a restaurant in Montclair that offers diners free electric-vehicle charging in its parking lot. “If they really wanted to be fair they would have had a public hearing.”
http://mobile.bloomberg.com/news/201...ect-sales.html
Camelot is offline  
Old March 11th, 2014, 05:25 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: In the mind of commie hippies
Posts: 38,895
Sure, Democrats are for statutory rape, and free porn enterprise and less regs in Africa.

I assume you believe that the actions of one person is representative of a political party and everyone associated with it. So Democrats are just like Mel Reynolds, a convicted child molester, pornography connoisseur, and was only able to start his life of sexually abusing young girls because Democrat president Clinton set him free from prison. Am I missing anything here?
Jimmyb is offline  
Old March 11th, 2014, 05:32 PM   #3
RNG
Senior Member
 
RNG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Between everywhere
Posts: 26,851
Yup, middlemen jacking up prices, exactly what the FF's wanted to happen.
Thanks from Camelot
RNG is offline  
Old March 11th, 2014, 05:40 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: In the mind of commie hippies
Posts: 38,895
Quote:
Originally Posted by RNG View Post
Yup, middlemen jacking up prices, exactly what the FF's wanted to happen.
The FFs would have said it not the federal government's problem.

But you missed the point of my post, which has nothing to do with the car company or the states. Just exposing more blanket propaganda about an entire party based on one person's actions.

It seems like this is equal Amazon and online retailers not having to have a storefront with expenses and being forced to charge taxes. They want to compete with dealers with large amounts of property, loans, employees, etc. as well.

I personally don't have a problem with it, and am against online retailers charging tax.
Jimmyb is offline  
Old March 11th, 2014, 06:26 PM   #5
RNG
Senior Member
 
RNG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Between everywhere
Posts: 26,851
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimmyb View Post
The FFs would have said it not the federal government's problem.

But you missed the point of my post, which has nothing to do with the car company or the states. Just exposing more blanket propaganda about an entire party based on one person's actions.

It seems like this is equal Amazon and online retailers not having to have a storefront with expenses and being forced to charge taxes. They want to compete with dealers with large amounts of property, loans, employees, etc. as well.

I personally don't have a problem with it, and am against online retailers charging tax.
Except Texas already has the same law. Advocacy | Texas | Tesla Motors

And they're trying to pass the same law in Ohio. Auto dealers push legislation to keep Tesla Motors out of Ohio | cleveland.com

Add North Carolina to the list. Yahoo!

And all that is just the first page on the Google search. Does that sound like one person's actions?
Thanks from Camelot
RNG is offline  
Old March 11th, 2014, 06:32 PM   #6
Talent on loan from god
 
Camelot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Ohio
Posts: 25,394
Tesla is building a mega battery factory to bring down the price of batteries through economies of scale. This scares the hell out of car manufacturers, dealerships and the oil industry. We must not advance as a society anymore. Those profiting today want the status quo to remain. That trumps free enterprise in the minds of any honest American IMO.
Camelot is offline  
Old March 11th, 2014, 06:46 PM   #7
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: In the mind of commie hippies
Posts: 38,895
Quote:
Originally Posted by RNG View Post
Except Texas already has the same law. Advocacy | Texas | Tesla Motors

And they're trying to pass the same law in Ohio. Auto dealers push legislation to keep Tesla Motors out of Ohio | cleveland.com

Add North Carolina to the list. Yahoo!

And all that is just the first page on the Google search. Does that sound like one person's actions?
You are making an argument where one does not exist.

The title of the article: "Tesla Stores May Be Closed After N.J. Blocks Direct Sales."

The propaganda by Camelot, which is what I addressed: "Sure, Republicans are for free enterprise and less regs. Here's an another example of republican hypocrisy when it comes to free enterprise and less regulation and job creation."

No different than skews.
Jimmyb is offline  
Old March 11th, 2014, 06:50 PM   #8
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: In the mind of commie hippies
Posts: 38,895
Quote:
Originally Posted by Camelot View Post
Tesla is building a mega battery factory to bring down the price of batteries through economies of scale. This scares the hell out of car manufacturers, dealerships and the oil industry. We must not advance as a society anymore. Those profiting today want the status quo to remain. That trumps free enterprise in the minds of any honest American IMO.
Why leave out what is unique about three of the four stated bidding?
Jimmyb is offline  
Reply

  Defending The Truth Political Forum > Political Forum > Current Events

Tags
enterprise, free, regs, republicans



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
White House blames the victim of Obamacare regs Uncle Han Current Events 0 November 7th, 2013 08:14 AM
At Their Flag Waving Core Republicans Oppose Democracy And A Free Society skews13 Current Events 37 July 8th, 2013 05:58 AM
As long as the Fed is, free enterprise cannot be imaginethat Fascism 3 October 4th, 2012 09:49 PM
PTSD: New regs will make it easier for war vets to get help intangible child Warfare 2 July 24th, 2010 11:46 AM


Facebook Twitter RSS Feed



Copyright © 2005-2013 Defending The Truth. All rights reserved.