Political Forums  

Go Back   Defending The Truth Political Forum > Political Forum > Current Events

Current Events Current Events Forum - Latest political news and events


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old April 10th, 2014, 09:57 AM   #1
Banned
 
excalibur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: The Milky Way
Posts: 24,581
Major Court Victory in North Carolina

Major Court Victory in North Carolina

Jury finds Professor Michael Adams’ “speech activity [was] a substantial or motivating factor in the defendants’ decision to not promote”

University of North Carolina at Wilmington professor Michael Adams has won his discrimination lawsuit, in a jury verdict rendered today. The judge now will rule on damages.

Adams was the professor who wrote the viral response to another professor who called Adams an “embarrassment” to higher education.

The case involved claims that Adams was subjected to discriminatory retaliation for expressing his Christian religious and politically conservative views. We have uploaded the Amended Complaint and Answer to the Amended Complaint.

Alliance Defending Freedom, which represented Adams, described the case as follows:

Dr. Mike Adams, a criminology professor at the University of North Carolina–Wilmington, frequently received accolades from his colleagues after the university hired him as an assistant professor in 1993 and promoted him to associate professor in 1998. At the time he was an atheist, but his conversion to Christianity in 2000 impacted his views on political and social issues. After this, he was subjected to intrusive investigations, baseless accusations, and the denial of promotion to full professor even though his scholarly output surpassed that of almost all of his colleagues. In a lawsuit filed against the university on Adams’ behalf, Alliance Defending Freedom attorneys contended that the university denied Adams a promotion because his nationally syndicated opinion columns espoused religious and political views that ran contrary to the opinions held by university officials.

The jury found that Adams’ “speech activity [was] a substantial or motivating factor in the defendants’ decision to not promote” Adams, and that the defendants’ would not have reached the same decision “in the absence of the plaintiff’s speech activity”.

The Judge now will resolve the damages, as set forth in the Judgment.

In response to the verdict, UNC issued the following statement, in part:

“UNCW strongly believes that its faculty properly applied their academic judgment in determining that Dr. Adams’ application did not merit promotion to full professor in 2006 and firmly denies that Dr. Adams’ political or religious viewpoints played any role whatsoever in the decision,” the statement read. “The university was, is, and will continue to be committed to the proposition that faculty are to be evaluated on their merit, regardless of their respective political or religious views or commentary.”




excalibur is offline  
Old April 10th, 2014, 10:01 AM   #2
Banned
 
excalibur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: The Milky Way
Posts: 24,581
Update --

Court orders promotion, back pay for believer suffering retaliation

Published: 23 hours ago
Mike Adams

Officials at the University of North Carolina-Wilmington have been ordered to pay a teacher $50,000 in back pay and promote him to a full professorship, backdated to 2007, for discriminating against him over his Christian perspectives.

The ruling from Senior U.S. District Judge Malcolm Howard comes in the case of Christian professor Mike Adams, who had faced retaliation, according to the jury, for his conservative views expressed in opinion columns, books and speeches.

“This is a great day not only for Dr. Adams but for all who value academic freedom,” said Senior Counsel Kevin Theriot of the Alliance Defending Freedom, which, along with the American Center for Law and Justice, represented Adams.

“The court’s order reminds universities that they cannot retaliate against those who simply express opinions that some officials do not like,” Theriot said.

WND reported last month the jury’s verdict in favor of Adams. The jury concluded the school unfairly denied a promotion to a professor who was celebrated when he was hired as an atheist but then faced retaliation when he became a Christian.

The decision in favor of Adams, a criminology professor at the University of North Carolina-Wilmington, was an important victory for academic freedom and the First Amendment, the two groups said.

ADF represented Adams together with lead counsel David French, who began the case with ADF and now litigates for ACLJ.

A former atheist, Adams frequently received praise from his colleagues after the university hired him as an assistant professor in 1993 and promoted him to associate professor in 1998.

But some of his views on political and social issues soon reflected his adoption of Christianity in 2000. Subsequently, his advocates said, the university subjected Adams to a campaign of academic persecution, including intrusive investigations, baseless accusations and other actions that culminated in his denial of promotion to full professor, despite an award-winning record of teaching, research and service.

In his lawsuit against the university, attorneys argued that officials denied him a deserved promotion because they disagreed with the content of his nationally syndicated opinion columns that espoused religious and political views contrary to the opinions held by university officials.

The judge granted the request for Adams’ promotion to the rank of full professor, as of 2007, “when the promotion would have taken effect had UNC Wilmington not violated Adams’ First Amendment rights,” according to the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education.

Also, the judge awarded $50,000 in back pay and has allowed more time for Adams to request costs and attorneys’ fees for the case that lasted seven years.

The judge also rejected defense requests for any changes in the jury verdict or a new trial.

“The court is fully satisfied there was sufficient evidence as a matter of law presented to the jury to find for plaintiff,” he said.

ACLJ noted that the university’s decision against promoting Adams at the time was not based on his work but on a process “that was chock-full of deception, discrimination, and disorder.”

“This ruling sends a message to public universities: academic freedom isn’t just for the Left, it’s a constitutional right for all professors – even Christian conservatives,” the organization said.

“As the marketplace of ideas, universities must respect the freedom of professors to express their points of view,” said ADF Litigation Staff Counsel Travis Barham. “The jury last month found that disagreeing with an accomplished professor’s religious and political views is no grounds for denying him a promotion.

“The court’s order rights the wrong done to Dr. Adams by granting him the full professorship he has long deserved.”

The jury had found that Adams’ “speech activity” was “a substantial or motivating factor in the defendants’ decision to not promote” him.

The jury also found that the defendants would not have made the same decision “in the absence of plaintiffs’ speech activity.”

The case went to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit for a ruling in 2011 that said “no individual loses his ability to speak as a private citizen by virtue of public employment.”

The court said Adams’ columns “addressed topics such as academic freedom, civil rights, campus culture, sex, feminism, abortion, homosexuality, religion, and morality.”

“Such topics plainly touched on issues of public, rather than private, concern.”

Adams had a novel way of making his point, as WND reported a year ago.

For example, in a Townhall.com column he poked fun at the idea a university should exclude a Chick-fil-A restaurant from its property because of pro-family views of the company’s owner.

Such exclusion, which Adams described as “queer reasoning,” would make the university more “inclusive,” campaigners apparently believed.

“I’ve been thinking about it, and I’ve decided that our LGBTQIA Office here on my campus makes me feel uncomfortable. In fact, the rainbow is a symbol of hate. So, next week, I plan to introduce a resolution to ban them from campus,” he wrote. “I expect the resolution to be defeated because it is idiotic. I’m just hoping I get a special office as a consolation prize – simply for being a narrow minded bigot.”

Lawyers said that when Adams was denied promotion in 2006, he had “multiple awards and rave reviews from students for his teaching, he had published more peer-reviewed articles than all but two of his colleagues, and he had a distinguished record of service both on and off campus, culminating in earning UNCW’s highest service award.”

Read more at Targeted Christian scores major legal victory



excalibur is offline  
Reply

  Defending The Truth Political Forum > Political Forum > Current Events

Tags
carolina, court, major, north, victory



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Vote Fraud in North Carolina excalibur Current Events 6 April 2nd, 2014 09:50 PM
N Carolina Heads To Victory In Defence Of Traditional Marriage garysher Current Events 268 May 16th, 2012 12:08 PM
Gay-Baiting in North Carolina Cubbie Current Events 18 August 3rd, 2010 06:45 PM
Major Marijuana Victory! hevusa Drugs, Alcohol, Tobacco 7 December 24th, 2005 11:53 AM
Gay-Baiting in North Carolina Politicians 0 December 31st, 1969 04:00 PM


Facebook Twitter RSS Feed



Copyright © 2005-2013 Defending The Truth. All rights reserved.