Political Forums  

Go Back   Defending The Truth Political Forum > Political Forum > Current Events

Current Events Current Events Forum - Latest political news and events


Thanks Tree7Thanks
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old July 8th, 2014, 09:41 AM   #1
Senior Member
 
skews13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: nirvana
Posts: 8,598
BBC To Climate Change Deniers: No More Air Time For You

To Improve Accuracy, BBC Tells Its Reporters To Stop Giving Air Time To Climate Deniers | ThinkProgress



Reporters for BBC News are being directed to significantly curb the amount of air time they give to people with anti-science viewpoints — including people who deny climate change exists — in order to improve the accuracy and fairness of the network’s news coverage, according to a report released by the BBC’s governing body on Thursday.

The BBC Trust’s report was designed to assess the network’s impartiality in science coverage, in other words, whether it is staying neutral on critical issues. In order to be neutral when covering science, however, the BBC noted it needs to avoid “false balance,” a fallacy that occurs when two sides of an argument are assumed to have equal value.

“Science coverage does not simply lie in reflecting a wide range of views but depends on the varying degree of prominence such views should be given,” the report said.

The type of “false balance” news segment that the BBC is now actively trying to avoid is one that is fairly common in American network news’ climate change coverage. It involves putting one person who is well-versed on climate science next to a person who denies climate science, and having them debate.

Editorially, this type of debate makes the network look like it’s being balanced, giving equal opportunity to opposite viewpoints. However, because 95 to 97 percent of climate scientists agree that man-made greenhouse gas emissions are causing the planet to warm, that balance is false, giving disproportionate time to a viewpoint that is widely rejected in the scientific community.

In order to have a truly balanced and statistically representative debate about climate change, television news networks would have to pit 97 climate scientists against three climate deniers. Because that likely wouldn’t work very well, the BBC is favoring an approach that instead severely limits the amount of air time climate deniers are given.

So far, the report said, approximately 200 staff members have attended seminars and workshops aimed at improving the balance of their science coverage.

The BBC Trust’s report did note that climate deniers wouldn’t be completely excluded from the conversation. “The Trust also would like to reiterate that … ‘this does not mean that critical opinion should be excluded. Nor does it mean that scientific research shouldn’t be properly scrutinized,’” the report said.

“The BBC has a duty to reflect the weight of scientific agreement but it should also reflect the existence of critical views appropriately. Audiences should be able to understand from the context and clarity of the BBC’s output what weight to give to critical voices.”

But despite the BBC’s pledge to have their reporters avoid false balance in climate change coverage, false balance is still a widespread phenomenon across prominent American news platforms. According to a 2013 report from Media Matters on the issue, half of print outlets used false balance to debate the existence of global warming.

When covering the U.N.’s landmark climate change report that year, CBS News gave climate deniers more than six times their representation in the scientific community, and 69 percent of guests on Fox News cast doubt on the science.

The obvious effect of this is that viewers are being misled about the reality of climate change and the urgency that comes with it. But the other effect is that viewers wind up not caring about climate change altogether.

“In the case of people who watch cable news, we’ve been so conditioned to favor a sense of certainty,” Dr. Stephen Reese, author of a 2008 white paper on how people make judgments about journalistic balance, told ThinkProgress in May. “We want to have our beliefs upheld. So when you introduce [climate change] as a political issue up for debate, it’s just, ‘well okay, there they go again,’ — just dismiss it as hopelessly polarized.”

When news outlets introduce false balance into its climate change stories, its audience then thinks those stories are less pressing than they actually are, a factor which contributes to uncertainty surrounding the issue and, ultimately, apathy. A 2009 study from the American Psychological Association confirmed this, noting that “perceived or real uncertainty” on climate change can lead to both “systematic underestimation of risk” and “sufficient reason to act in self interest over that of the environment.”
Thanks from Camelot
skews13 is offline  
Old July 8th, 2014, 10:01 AM   #2
I'm debt free
 
TNVolunteer73's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Lebanon, TN
Posts: 34,209
THE FLAT EARTHER HOAXERS have just become the Roman Catholic Church of the 21st Century...


Flat earth Skews, is you new name.
TNVolunteer73 is offline  
Old July 8th, 2014, 11:03 AM   #3
Talent on loan from god
 
Camelot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Ohio
Posts: 25,570
They'll be totally marginalized and laughed at.
Camelot is offline  
Old July 8th, 2014, 12:12 PM   #4
Mayor of Realville
 
webguy4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Michigan
Posts: 15,121
without dissent, science is dead.
webguy4 is offline  
Old July 8th, 2014, 12:13 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
LongWinded's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: United States
Posts: 11,828
Quote:
Originally Posted by skews13 View Post
To Improve Accuracy, BBC Tells Its Reporters To Stop Giving Air Time To Climate Deniers | ThinkProgress



Reporters for BBC News are being directed to significantly curb the amount of air time they give to people with anti-science viewpoints — including people who deny climate change exists — in order to improve the accuracy and fairness of the network’s news coverage, according to a report released by the BBC’s governing body on Thursday.

The BBC Trust’s report was designed to assess the network’s impartiality in science coverage, in other words, whether it is staying neutral on critical issues. In order to be neutral when covering science, however, the BBC noted it needs to avoid “false balance,” a fallacy that occurs when two sides of an argument are assumed to have equal value.

“Science coverage does not simply lie in reflecting a wide range of views but depends on the varying degree of prominence such views should be given,” the report said.

The type of “false balance” news segment that the BBC is now actively trying to avoid is one that is fairly common in American network news’ climate change coverage. It involves putting one person who is well-versed on climate science next to a person who denies climate science, and having them debate.

Editorially, this type of debate makes the network look like it’s being balanced, giving equal opportunity to opposite viewpoints. However, because 95 to 97 percent of climate scientists agree that man-made greenhouse gas emissions are causing the planet to warm, that balance is false, giving disproportionate time to a viewpoint that is widely rejected in the scientific community.

In order to have a truly balanced and statistically representative debate about climate change, television news networks would have to pit 97 climate scientists against three climate deniers. Because that likely wouldn’t work very well, the BBC is favoring an approach that instead severely limits the amount of air time climate deniers are given.

So far, the report said, approximately 200 staff members have attended seminars and workshops aimed at improving the balance of their science coverage.

The BBC Trust’s report did note that climate deniers wouldn’t be completely excluded from the conversation. “The Trust also would like to reiterate that … ‘this does not mean that critical opinion should be excluded. Nor does it mean that scientific research shouldn’t be properly scrutinized,’” the report said.

“The BBC has a duty to reflect the weight of scientific agreement but it should also reflect the existence of critical views appropriately. Audiences should be able to understand from the context and clarity of the BBC’s output what weight to give to critical voices.”

But despite the BBC’s pledge to have their reporters avoid false balance in climate change coverage, false balance is still a widespread phenomenon across prominent American news platforms. According to a 2013 report from Media Matters on the issue, half of print outlets used false balance to debate the existence of global warming.

When covering the U.N.’s landmark climate change report that year, CBS News gave climate deniers more than six times their representation in the scientific community, and 69 percent of guests on Fox News cast doubt on the science.

The obvious effect of this is that viewers are being misled about the reality of climate change and the urgency that comes with it. But the other effect is that viewers wind up not caring about climate change altogether.

“In the case of people who watch cable news, we’ve been so conditioned to favor a sense of certainty,” Dr. Stephen Reese, author of a 2008 white paper on how people make judgments about journalistic balance, told ThinkProgress in May. “We want to have our beliefs upheld. So when you introduce [climate change] as a political issue up for debate, it’s just, ‘well okay, there they go again,’ — just dismiss it as hopelessly polarized.”

When news outlets introduce false balance into its climate change stories, its audience then thinks those stories are less pressing than they actually are, a factor which contributes to uncertainty surrounding the issue and, ultimately, apathy. A 2009 study from the American Psychological Association confirmed this, noting that “perceived or real uncertainty” on climate change can lead to both “systematic underestimation of risk” and “sufficient reason to act in self interest over that of the environment.”
Isn't this refreshing news? To stop the stupid from being on air? I just love the Brits love of the educated.
Thanks from Camelot
LongWinded is offline  
Old July 8th, 2014, 12:41 PM   #6
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Katmandu
Posts: 5,031
Sounds like censorship to me.
Libertine is offline  
Old July 8th, 2014, 12:44 PM   #7
Banned
 
NowhereMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: The South
Posts: 1,660
Quote:
Originally Posted by TNVolunteer73 View Post
Flat earth Skews, is you new name.
Amused by the name, must use forever.
Perhaps with a little NowhereMan embellishment:

"Flat Earth Skews Bunnypants"
NowhereMan is offline  
Old July 8th, 2014, 01:08 PM   #8
RNG
Senior Member
 
RNG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Between everywhere
Posts: 27,335
Quote:
Originally Posted by Libertine View Post
Sounds like censorship to me.
The Canadian equivalent of the FCC banned several TV and radio shows where faith healing for money and pleas for donations to grossly inefficient charities were prominent. Do you consider those moves to be censorship too?
RNG is offline  
Old July 8th, 2014, 01:48 PM   #9
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: NM
Posts: 1,238
What's the buzz ...

Quote:
Originally Posted by TNVolunteer73 View Post
THE FLAT EARTHER HOAXERS have just become the Roman Catholic Church of the 21st Century...

Flat earth Skews, is you new name.
(My bold)

What does the flat Earth theory have to do with BBC/Climate Change coverage?

& the swipe @ Catholicism seems gratuitous. Why take a swing @ them in this context? Isn't this a segment you count on for support on Biblical opposition to abortion?
hoosier88 is offline  
Old July 8th, 2014, 02:17 PM   #10
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: NM
Posts: 1,238
But it does move!

Quote:
Originally Posted by webguy4 View Post
without dissent, science is dead.
(My bold)

"The BBC Trust’s report did note that climate deniers wouldn’t be completely excluded from the conversation. “The Trust also would like to reiterate that … ‘this does not mean that critical opinion should be excluded. Nor does it mean that scientific research shouldn’t be properly scrutinized,’” the report said.

" “The BBC has a duty to reflect the weight of scientific agreement but it should also reflect the existence of critical views appropriately. Audiences should be able to understand from the context and clarity of the BBC’s output what weight to give to critical voices.” "

(Paras 8 & 9 of the BBC presser above) (My emphasis)

The original article @ the URL seems to have a bad headline. Climate change deniers aren't being denied media coverage. But the BBC Trust seems to be saying that deniers will have to come up with good science. Of course, BBC may not be in a strong position to judge among the competing theories as to causes, rates, implications, etc. of climate change. That's a risk that's inherent in mass media coverage of stories of any import.

Still, in the interests of showing all the facets of the series of stories, it's worth noting that the majority of working scientists in the related fields agree that there's climate change, & that human industry has accelerated climate change.

Outside of that, there's still a lot of work to do on refining the computer models, taking measurements in the air, water, snowpack, tundra. There are thousands of minute bits that need to be checked & measured, & input into the theories about climate change.
Thanks from imaginethat
hoosier88 is offline  
Reply

  Defending The Truth Political Forum > Political Forum > Current Events

Tags
air, bbc, change, climate, deniers, time



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Salamanders and climate change. roastpork Environment 3 April 9th, 2014 07:23 PM
The LIABILITY, for climate change: bobgnote Environment 34 December 26th, 2013 05:00 AM
The Coming GOP Civil War Over Climate Change Mrs. CJ Parker Current Events 54 May 19th, 2013 09:00 PM
fixing climate change webguy4 Environment 31 May 17th, 2013 03:01 AM
Another Blow To 'Climate Change' excalibur Current Events 6 May 4th, 2013 10:14 AM


Facebook Twitter RSS Feed



Copyright © 2005-2013 Defending The Truth. All rights reserved.