Political Forums  

Go Back   Defending The Truth Political Forum > Political Forum > Current Events

Current Events Current Events Forum - Latest political news and events


Thanks Tree8Thanks
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old April 9th, 2015, 12:17 PM   #11
Banned
 
excalibur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: The Milky Way
Posts: 24,581
U.S., Iran Openly Fighting Over Details of the Supposed Nuclear ?Agreement? | TheBlaze.com



excalibur is offline  
Old April 9th, 2015, 04:02 PM   #12
Banned
 
excalibur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: The Milky Way
Posts: 24,581
Ayatollah Khamenei Accuses WH of 'Lying,' Being 'Deceptive,' and Having 'Devilish' Intentions | The Weekly Standard


excalibur is offline  
Old April 10th, 2015, 05:27 AM   #13
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Matrix
Posts: 1,527
Quote:
Originally Posted by BubbaJones View Post
So you people would prefer NO DEAL AT ALL ???

In 13 years, you don't think we might be able to renegotiate ??

In 13 years, could there be a major shift in the political landscape within Iran ??

In 13 years, could we not have developed much greater observation and intelligence technology that would allow us to monitor them ??

The hypocrisy is laughable. When it come to budgets we ROUNTINELY hear about 10 year projections in either savings or cost expansion. But a 13 year deal with Iran isn't acceptable when there's no other option right now ??

And I've asked this before, and NO ONE has even tried to answer, WHAT WOULD YOU DO AS PRESIDENT ??

You need to protect our president better than this. Pathetic. I'm tired of incompetent liberals.
BigLibSB is offline  
Old April 10th, 2015, 06:34 AM   #14
Senior Member
 
imaginethat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Western Slope, Colorado
Posts: 59,444
Quote:
Originally Posted by BubbaJones View Post
So you people would prefer NO DEAL AT ALL ???

In 13 years, you don't think we might be able to renegotiate ??

In 13 years, could there be a major shift in the political landscape within Iran ??

In 13 years, could we not have developed much greater observation and intelligence technology that would allow us to monitor them ??

The hypocrisy is laughable. When it come to budgets we ROUNTINELY hear about 10 year projections in either savings or cost expansion. But a 13 year deal with Iran isn't acceptable when there's no other option right now ??

And I've asked this before, and NO ONE has even tried to answer, WHAT WOULD YOU DO AS PRESIDENT ??
Oh now Bubba, you can hear what they'd do, but you've got to listen between the lines.

They'd attach conditions to the agreement that they up front know will cause the agreement to be rejected. Then when Iran walks away from negotiations, "more severe sanctions" would put in place.

Next, "a source close to the events who must remain confidential because he isn't authorized to speak publicly on the subject" provides "rock-solid proof" that Iran is mere months away from having the bomb.

So, a "told you so" Netanyahu starts the Iran War, which rapidly escalates as the export of Persian Gulf oil comes almost to a stop, which draws in nation after nation. The West finds itself on the side of Sunni Islam, just as Israel hoped. Russia, India, and China are BIG wild cards.

That's "the plan" in a nutshell, not too complicated, but they don't - can't - come out and explain it as simply as I did because they need some way to have "plausible deniability" when their totally insane plan indeed does become the opening act of WWIII.

So instead, they continue doing what they've been doing, hammering Obama relentlessly because .... well because that's all they've been doing since Inauguration Day 2009.

And perhaps in the "unintended consequence" department, the outcome resulting from six-plus years of being defined personally and politically by being against whatever Obama is for turns out to be ever-worsening damage to their minds (ODS), damage which perhaps is permanent.
Thanks from waitingtables

Last edited by imaginethat; April 10th, 2015 at 06:38 AM.
imaginethat is online now  
Old April 10th, 2015, 08:39 AM   #15
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Matrix
Posts: 1,527
Quote:
Originally Posted by imaginethat View Post
Oh now Bubba, you can hear what they'd do, but you've got to listen between the lines.

They'd attach conditions to the agreement that they up front know will cause the agreement to be rejected. Then when Iran walks away from negotiations, "more severe sanctions" would put in place.

Next, "a source close to the events who must remain confidential because he isn't authorized to speak publicly on the subject" provides "rock-solid proof" that Iran is mere months away from having the bomb.

So, a "told you so" Netanyahu starts the Iran War, which rapidly escalates as the export of Persian Gulf oil comes almost to a stop, which draws in nation after nation. The West finds itself on the side of Sunni Islam, just as Israel hoped. Russia, India, and China are BIG wild cards.

That's "the plan" in a nutshell, not too complicated, but they don't - can't - come out and explain it as simply as I did because they need some way to have "plausible deniability" when their totally insane plan indeed does become the opening act of WWIII.

So instead, they continue doing what they've been doing, hammering Obama relentlessly because .... well because that's all they've been doing since Inauguration Day 2009.

And perhaps in the "unintended consequence" department, the outcome resulting from six-plus years of being defined personally and politically by being against whatever Obama is for turns out to be ever-worsening damage to their minds (ODS), damage which perhaps is permanent.


Your choices are simple: President Obama's brilliant agreement which leads to peace OR total war. Those are the only 2 options available. THERE ARE NO OTHER OPTIONS! Give peace a chance.

And to you RWNJ, Iran is only trying to save face in the world. They are as committed to this agreement as President Obama is.
BigLibSB is offline  
Old April 10th, 2015, 08:55 AM   #16
Senior Member
 
roastpork's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 8,598
Kissinger is still alive; Persia still wants to rule the Near East; China still really, really, hates Japan; most politicians suck, and Disney World still costs too much.
Thanks from caconservative
roastpork is offline  
Old April 10th, 2015, 08:59 AM   #17
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: California
Posts: 18,037
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hollywood View Post
"asserted"......*shrug*
Obimbo...Teleprompter...Obimbo...Tele-Promp-Ter...........please!
caconservative is offline  
Old April 10th, 2015, 09:02 AM   #18
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: California
Posts: 18,037
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigLibSB View Post
Your choices are simple: President Obama's brilliant agreement which leads to peace OR total war. Those are the only 2 options available. THERE ARE NO OTHER OPTIONS! Give peace a chance.

And to you RWNJ, Iran is only trying to save face in the world. They are as committed to this agreement as President Obama is.
Ya, kicking the can down the road is always a good plan? How about, taking out Iran's nuclear capability....problem solved.
Thanks from roastpork
caconservative is offline  
Old April 10th, 2015, 09:03 AM   #19
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: California
Posts: 18,037
Quote:
Originally Posted by imaginethat View Post
Oh now Bubba, you can hear what they'd do, but you've got to listen between the lines.

They'd attach conditions to the agreement that they up front know will cause the agreement to be rejected. Then when Iran walks away from negotiations, "more severe sanctions" would put in place.

Next, "a source close to the events who must remain confidential because he isn't authorized to speak publicly on the subject" provides "rock-solid proof" that Iran is mere months away from having the bomb.

So, a "told you so" Netanyahu starts the Iran War, which rapidly escalates as the export of Persian Gulf oil comes almost to a stop, which draws in nation after nation. The West finds itself on the side of Sunni Islam, just as Israel hoped. Russia, India, and China are BIG wild cards.

That's "the plan" in a nutshell, not too complicated, but they don't - can't - come out and explain it as simply as I did because they need some way to have "plausible deniability" when their totally insane plan indeed does become the opening act of WWIII.

So instead, they continue doing what they've been doing, hammering Obama relentlessly because .... well because that's all they've been doing since Inauguration Day 2009.

And perhaps in the "unintended consequence" department, the outcome resulting from six-plus years of being defined personally and politically by being against whatever Obama is for turns out to be ever-worsening damage to their minds (ODS), damage which perhaps is permanent.
Sever sanctions? After the horse has left the barn? Ya, that makes sense?!
caconservative is offline  
Old April 10th, 2015, 09:06 AM   #20
Senior Member
 
Hollywood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Memphis, Tn.
Posts: 21,871
Quote:
Originally Posted by caconservative View Post
Ya, kicking the can down the road is always a good plan? How about, taking out Iran's nuclear capability....problem solved.
Well, I suppose if one is too stupid to use any tool other than a hammer ALL problems start to look like a nail.
Thanks from RNG
Hollywood is offline  
Reply

  Defending The Truth Political Forum > Political Forum > Current Events

Tags
confusion, department, obama, open, remarks, state



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Remarks by President Obama at Open Government Partnership Meeting The White House The White House 0 September 25th, 2014 06:00 AM
Confusion over doctor lists is costly for Obamacare enrollees in state antares Healthcare 1 June 29th, 2014 09:07 AM
Remarks by the President in Presenting State Department's 2014 Women of Courage Award The White House The White House 0 March 29th, 2014 08:13 AM
Remarks by National Security Advisor Susan E. Rice at the Department of State’s Globa The White House The White House 0 March 12th, 2014 06:34 AM
President Obama's State department said they could not afford more security for Bengazi EmbassyBut they could afford Diplomatic Culinary Partnership TNVolunteer73 Current Events 2 December 20th, 2012 05:42 PM


Facebook Twitter RSS Feed



Copyright © 2005-2013 Defending The Truth. All rights reserved.