Political Forums  

Go Back   Defending The Truth Political Forum > Political Forum > Current Events

Current Events Current Events Forum - Latest political news and events


Thanks Tree152Thanks
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old October 12th, 2016, 02:29 PM   #91
Senior Member
 
Nwolfe35's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
Posts: 16,443
Quote:
Originally Posted by caconservative View Post
But you just told us moral judgment is a norm society attains to find peace and harmony within its ranks. Since a state is sovereign, it's within the prevue of the inhabitants of that state to find and adopt the moral standard that best serve the people of that state. Because the Court cannot Constitutionally Legislate law any attempt to do so is not within the Standing of the Court and has no legal validity when applied to a sovereign state. The state's did not give that authority to the SC., and is therefor held within the state's. Hence, the 10th and 11th Amendments.
Now you're confusing Society with government.

Courts do not create laws, they review laws and render a judgement based on those laws. For all the cries of "judicial activism" I can't think of a case where a court has created a law.
Thanks from GhostRider
Nwolfe35 is online now  
Old October 12th, 2016, 02:33 PM   #92
Senior Member
 
Jimmyb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Earth
Posts: 38,895
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nwolfe35 View Post
Now you're confusing Society with government.

Courts do not create laws, they review laws and render a judgement based on those laws. For all the cries of "judicial activism" I can't think of a case where a court has created a law.
There is nothing in the Constitution nor the intent of the Constitution that grants any federal court jurisdiction over a state law other than a state law that conflicts with an Article I power. And the Bill of Rights were created to be untouchable by any of the three branches of the federal government.
Jimmyb is offline  
Old October 12th, 2016, 02:36 PM   #93
Senior Member
 
Nwolfe35's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
Posts: 16,443
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimmyb View Post
There is nothing in the Constitution nor the intent of the Constitution that grants any federal court jurisdiction over a state law other than a state law that conflicts with an Article I power. And the Bill of Rights were created to be untouchable by any of the three branches of the federal government.
So when the legislative branch passes a law that violates the rights of an individual who can the individual turn to?
Thanks from GhostRider and Daws77
Nwolfe35 is online now  
Old October 12th, 2016, 02:42 PM   #94
Senior Member
 
Jimmyb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Earth
Posts: 38,895
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nwolfe35 View Post
So when the legislative branch passes a law that violates the rights of an individual who can the individual turn to?
Federal?
Jimmyb is offline  
Old October 12th, 2016, 02:55 PM   #95
Senior Member
 
Hollywood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Memphis, Tn.
Posts: 23,061
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daws77 View Post
Your pseudo intellectualization is fucking hilarious but completely void of substance.
"theoretical complacency?" What...The...Fuck???
Thanks from GhostRider and Daws77
Hollywood is offline  
Old October 12th, 2016, 03:53 PM   #96
Banned
 
excalibur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: The Milky Way
Posts: 24,581
The 14th Amendment, Section 5. Yet the Court has assumed to itself that clear grant to Congress.


excalibur is offline  
Old October 12th, 2016, 04:13 PM   #97
Banned
 
Daws77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: California
Posts: 7,543
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimmyb View Post
There is nothing in the Constitution nor the intent of the Constitution that grants any federal court jurisdiction over a state law other than a state law that conflicts with an Article I power. And the Bill of Rights were created to be untouchable by any of the three branches of the federal government.
False !
The Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution (Article VI, Clause 2) establishes that the Constitution,
federal laws made pursuant to it, and treaties made under its authority, constitute the supreme law of the land.[1] It provides that state courts are bound by the supreme law; in case of conflict between federal and state law, the federal law must be applied. Even state constitutions are subordinate to federal law.[2] In essence, it is a conflict-of-laws rule specifying that certain national acts take priority over any state acts that conflict with national law. In this respect, the Supremacy Clause follows the lead of Article XIII of the Articles of Confederation, which provided that "Every State shall abide by the determination of the United States in Congress Assembled, on all questions which by this confederation are submitted to them."[3] A constitutional provision announcing the supremacy of federal law, the Supremacy Clause assumes the underlying priority of federal authority, at least when that authority is expressed in the Constitution itself.[4] No matter what the federal government or the states might wish to do, they have to stay within the boundaries of the Constitution. This makes the Supremacy Clause the cornerstone of the whole American political structure.[5][6]

As to the intent of the Constitution , you are by no
Stretch of the imagination able to objectivity judge it's intent.
Thanks from GhostRider
Daws77 is offline  
Old October 12th, 2016, 04:15 PM   #98
Banned
 
Daws77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: California
Posts: 7,543
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hollywood View Post
"theoretical complacency?" What...The...Fuck???
He's making shit up, badly.
Thanks from GhostRider
Daws77 is offline  
Old October 12th, 2016, 04:21 PM   #99
Banned
 
Daws77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: California
Posts: 7,543
Quote:
Originally Posted by excalibur View Post
The 14th Amendment, Section 5. Yet the Court has assumed to itself that clear grant to Congress.


The Atlantic
The Supreme Paradox: When the Court Overrides Congress
Daws77 is offline  
Old October 12th, 2016, 04:24 PM   #100
Senior Member
 
Jimmyb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Earth
Posts: 38,895
Troll/sock found something on Wikipedia. Too bad he has no clue what it means or the intelligence to defend it.
Jimmyb is offline  
Reply

  Defending The Truth Political Forum > Political Forum > Current Events

Tags
audio, perfect, response, trump



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Trump audio fall out and Gary Johnson coke Politicians 19 October 8th, 2016 02:45 PM
The Trump Response! coke Current Events 0 August 2nd, 2016 08:21 PM
Texas Paramedic Has Perfect Response to Conservatives LongWinded Current Events 24 August 7th, 2015 02:26 PM
Audio books kowalskil Books and Literature 1 October 3rd, 2014 09:09 AM
Charlie Crist Delivers Perfect Response To Rick Scott On Climate Change LongWinded Current Events 1 July 26th, 2014 04:05 PM


Facebook Twitter RSS Feed



Copyright © 2005-2013 Defending The Truth. All rights reserved.