Political Forums  

Go Back   Defending The Truth Political Forum > Political Forum > Current Events

Current Events Current Events Forum - Latest political news and events


Thanks Tree98Thanks
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old June 30th, 2017, 07:46 AM   #1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: USA
Posts: 1,234
Why can’t we get this type of bill introduced ending Planned Parenthood funding?

.

Why cant we get this type of bill introduced in Congress?



A BILL

To return integrity to the Congress of the United States by ending un-constitutional Federal expenditures to Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc.


Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,



SECTION 1. Short title.


This Act may be cited as the “Ending un-constitutional Federal Funding to Planned Parenthood Act of 2017”.

SEC. 2. Findings.

Congress finds the following:

(1) That a fundamental principle of constitutional construction requires an adherence to the text of our Constitution and its documented legislative intent, which gives context to its text.

(2) That after reading the text of our Constitution and reviewing the debates during which time our Constitution was framed and ratified, there is no wording which can be pointed to authorizing Congress to tax for and appropriate federal revenue to an entity which provides medical services to people within a State’s borders.


(3) That to continue such funding is to engage in a misappropriation of federal revenue, allows Congress to exercise a power not granted, and this in turn creates a factious entity that bribes complicit members of Congress through political contributions and corrupts the very foundation of our system of government.

SEC. 3. Now, therefore

(1) Upon passage of this Act in Congress Assembled and the President’s approval, there shall be no more federal revenue appropriated from the Treasury of the United States to Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc.,or its affiliates.

SEC. 4. Rule of Construction.

Nothing in this Act shall be construed to forbid Federal funding of Congress’ constitutionally authorized functions.


_________




JWK


American citizens are sick and tired of being made into tax-slaves to finance a maternity ward for the poverty stricken populations of other countries who invade America’s borders to give birth.
johnwk is offline  
Old June 30th, 2017, 10:51 AM   #2
Senior Member
 
Hollywood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Memphis, Tn.
Posts: 17,282
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnwk View Post
.

Why cant we get this type of bill introduced in Congress?



A BILL

To return integrity to the Congress of the United States by ending un-constitutional Federal expenditures to Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc.


Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,



SECTION 1. Short title.


This Act may be cited as the “Ending un-constitutional Federal Funding to Planned Parenthood Act of 2017”.

SEC. 2. Findings.

Congress finds the following:

(1) That a fundamental principle of constitutional construction requires an adherence to the text of our Constitution and its documented legislative intent, which gives context to its text.

(2) That after reading the text of our Constitution and reviewing the debates during which time our Constitution was framed and ratified, there is no wording which can be pointed to authorizing Congress to tax for and appropriate federal revenue to an entity which provides medical services to people within a State’s borders.


(3) That to continue such funding is to engage in a misappropriation of federal revenue, allows Congress to exercise a power not granted, and this in turn creates a factious entity that bribes complicit members of Congress through political contributions and corrupts the very foundation of our system of government.

SEC. 3. Now, therefore

(1) Upon passage of this Act in Congress Assembled and the President’s approval, there shall be no more federal revenue appropriated from the Treasury of the United States to Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc.,or its affiliates.

SEC. 4. Rule of Construction.

Nothing in this Act shall be construed to forbid Federal funding of Congress’ constitutionally authorized functions.


_________




JWK


American citizens are sick and tired of being made into tax-slaves to finance a maternity ward for the poverty stricken populations of other countries who invade America’s borders to give birth.
Uh, because most people don't want it.
Thanks from catus felis and goober
Hollywood is offline  
Old June 30th, 2017, 11:44 AM   #3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: USA
Posts: 1,234
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hollywood View Post
Uh, because most people don't want it.
I don't recall a constitutional amendment being passed by a majority of the people which authorizes Congress to lay and collect taxes to finance the social needs of the people within the various States.


JWK




The unavoidable truth is, the Bernie Sanders’ plan for “free” college tuition, if adopted, will be paid for by taxing millions of college graduates who worked their own way through college and are now trying to finance their own economic needs.

Thanks from Sabcat and Sensible
johnwk is offline  
Old June 30th, 2017, 12:23 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
BubbaJones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Middle Tennessee
Posts: 5,853
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnwk View Post
.

Why cant we get this type of bill introduced in Congress?



A BILL

To return integrity to the Congress of the United States by ending un-constitutional Federal expenditures to Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc.


Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,



SECTION 1. Short title.


This Act may be cited as the “Ending un-constitutional Federal Funding to Planned Parenthood Act of 2017”.

SEC. 2. Findings.

Congress finds the following:

(1) That a fundamental principle of constitutional construction requires an adherence to the text of our Constitution and its documented legislative intent, which gives context to its text.

(2) That after reading the text of our Constitution and reviewing the debates during which time our Constitution was framed and ratified, there is no wording which can be pointed to authorizing Congress to tax for and appropriate federal revenue to an entity which provides medical services to people within a State’s borders.


(3) That to continue such funding is to engage in a misappropriation of federal revenue, allows Congress to exercise a power not granted, and this in turn creates a factious entity that bribes complicit members of Congress through political contributions and corrupts the very foundation of our system of government.

SEC. 3. Now, therefore

(1) Upon passage of this Act in Congress Assembled and the President’s approval, there shall be no more federal revenue appropriated from the Treasury of the United States to Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc.,or its affiliates.

SEC. 4. Rule of Construction.

Nothing in this Act shall be construed to forbid Federal funding of Congress’ constitutionally authorized functions.


_________




JWK


American citizens are sick and tired of being made into tax-slaves to finance a maternity ward for the poverty stricken populations of other countries who invade America’s borders to give birth.

You'd rather have us paying for 18 years of WIC, welfare and section 8 housing ??? Only to have that generation grow up and follow the same route because we didn't invest in birthcontrol ??

You're a fucking moron !!!
Thanks from skews13 and jetson
BubbaJones is offline  
Old June 30th, 2017, 01:15 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
Clara007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Arizona
Posts: 6,414
Quote:
Originally Posted by BubbaJones View Post
You'd rather have us paying for 18 years of WIC, welfare and section 8 housing ??? Only to have that generation grow up and follow the same route because we didn't invest in birthcontrol ??

You're a fucking moron !!!


Bub, I think you're missing an important element of this issue. If the above bill is introduced and passes, America will have a whole new generation (and a lot of them since there'll be no birth control) who need welfare. AWESOME, right? Then with all the money/taxes we saved we can support millions more welfare recipients. YAY!!

Great plan, John.
Thanks from catus felis
Clara007 is offline  
Old June 30th, 2017, 02:11 PM   #6
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: USA
Posts: 1,234
Quote:
Originally Posted by BubbaJones View Post
You'd rather have us paying for 18 years of WIC, welfare and section 8 housing ??? Only to have that generation grow up and follow the same route because we didn't invest in birthcontrol ??

You're a fucking moron !!!
Actually, I was thinking of a Bill, similar to the one above, but listing every federally finance free cheese appropriation and eliminating it because there is no wording in our federal Constitution to be found allowing Congress to tax for and spend on the social needs of the people within the various state borders.

So, the answer to your question is no! But if you and the people living in your state are willing to be taxed to finance the social needs of the people living in your state, have at it, but leave me out of the loop.



JWK


There is no magic wand in government force which changes the definition of thievery. Those who use and rely upon government force to gain possession of the product of their neighbor’s labor for their personal economic needs are complicit in the act of thievery
Thanks from Sabcat
johnwk is offline  
Old June 30th, 2017, 02:25 PM   #7
Senior Member
 
skews13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: nirvana
Posts: 8,235
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnwk View Post
Actually, I was thinking of a Bill, similar to the one above, but listing every federally finance free cheese appropriation and eliminating it because there is no wording in our federal Constitution to be found allowing Congress to tax for and spend on the social needs of the people within the various state borders.

So, the answer to your question is no! But if you and the people living in your state are willing to be taxed to finance the social needs of the people living in your state, have at it, but leave me out of the loop.



JWK


There is no magic wand in government force which changes the definition of thievery. Those who use and rely upon government force to gain possession of the product of their neighbor’s labor for their personal economic needs are complicit in the act of thievery
Well, there certainly isn't much argument that can be made about you being out of the loop.

Now for a primer in Constitution 101.

ARTICLE 1 SECTION 1
All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives.

End of you free cheese argument, or anyother argument you may ever put forward again regarding anything Constitution.

With that first sentence of the Constitution based upon this premise.

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
Thanks from catus felis
skews13 is offline  
Old June 30th, 2017, 02:29 PM   #8
Commie Exposer
 
Jimmyb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Republic of Texas
Posts: 38,835
Quote:
Originally Posted by skews13 View Post
Well, there certainly isn't much argument that can be made about you being out of the loop.

Now for a primer in Constitution 101.

ARTICLE 1 SECTION 1
All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives.

End of you free cheese argument, or anyother argument you may ever put forward again regarding anything Constitution.

With that first sentence of the Constitution based upon this premise.

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
Article I, Section I only defines what branch can make laws. Article I, Section 8 enumerates the limits of what laws the legislature can create.
Jimmyb is offline  
Old June 30th, 2017, 02:32 PM   #9
Senior Member
 
Hollywood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Memphis, Tn.
Posts: 17,282
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnwk View Post
I don't recall a constitutional amendment being passed by a majority of the people which authorizes Congress to lay and collect taxes to finance the social needs of the people within the various States.


JWK




The unavoidable truth is, the Bernie Sanders’ plan for “free” college tuition, if adopted, will be paid for by taxing millions of college graduates who worked their own way through college and are now trying to finance their own economic needs.

Tough shit. Sue, take it to the SCOTUS. *shrug*
Hollywood is offline  
Old June 30th, 2017, 03:15 PM   #10
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: USA
Posts: 1,234
Constitutional law, 101

Quote:
Originally Posted by skews13 View Post
Well, there certainly isn't much argument that can be made about you being out of the loop.

Now for a primer in Constitution 101.

ARTICLE 1 SECTION 1
All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives.

End of you free cheese argument, or anyother argument you may ever put forward again regarding anything Constitution.

With that first sentence of the Constitution based upon this premise.

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
And what does your post have to do with what I have written?

As to constitutional law 101, let me be the first to enlighten you regarding the most fundamental rule regarding constitutional construction:




The fundamental principle of constitutional construction is that effect must be given to the intent of the framers of the organic law and of the people adopting it. This is the polestar in the construction of constitutions, all other principles of construction are only rules or guides to aid in the determination of the intention of the constitution’s framers.--- numerous citations omitted__ Vol.16 American Jurisprudence, 2d Constitutional law (1992 edition), pages 418-19 - - - Par. 92. Intent of framers and adopters as controlling.


Regards,

JWK






The whole aim of construction, as applied to a provision of the Constitution, is to discover the meaning, to ascertain and give effect to the intent of its framers and the people who adopted it.
_____HOME BLDG. & LOAN ASS'N v. BLAISDELL, 290 U.S. 398 (1934)
johnwk is offline  
Reply

  Defending The Truth Political Forum > Political Forum > Current Events

Tags
bill, can’t, ending, funding, introduced, parenthood, planned, type



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Most Americans Want To Keep Funding For Planned Parenthood And Obamacare skews13 Current Events 29 January 30th, 2017 10:35 AM
Obama To Protect Planned Parenthood Funding Permanently skews13 Healthcare 7 September 10th, 2016 06:34 PM
Planned Parenthood Goes To Court To Fight Funding Cuts In Alabama LongWinded Current Events 62 August 31st, 2015 02:46 PM
planned parenthood still at it webguy4 Current Events 1 July 16th, 2014 10:38 AM
Planned Parenthood ad gmeyers1944 Abortion 44 September 5th, 2010 06:36 AM


Facebook Twitter RSS Feed



Copyright © 2005-2013 Defending The Truth. All rights reserved.