Political Forums  

Go Back   Defending The Truth Political Forum > Political Forum > Current Events

Current Events Current Events Forum - Latest political news and events


Thanks Tree30Thanks
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old August 10th, 2017, 03:13 PM   #31
Celebrating diversity
 
Sabcat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Earth
Posts: 21,522
Quote:
Originally Posted by imaginethat View Post
Don't wait too long for an answer you'll never get.

No-knock warrants are not granted for frivolous reasons.
I know, the militarized police force is used w/ such restraint these days. They never kick in old lady's doors, shoot dogs or people.


https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20...nnection.shtml
Thanks from Jimmyb, guy39 and Maverick
Sabcat is offline  
Old August 10th, 2017, 03:31 PM   #32
Banned
 
Maverick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: RV
Posts: 129
Quote:
Originally Posted by imaginethat View Post
Most? You're arguing that having "most" of the evidence is sufficient?

Unlike you, perhaps someone thought having ALL the evidence would be a good idea, that maybe the information withheld was incriminating, and that's why it was withheld.




Any financial info is redundant as banks are required to maintain it for years. It was a drama queen move by Mueller.

Mueller, with his passel of Clinton-Obama donors as his lawyers, and leaking grand jury information, information that is supposed to be secret.

Perhaps the reasons behind the warrant, the sworn reasons, will make interesting reading. As if the FBI hasn't made things up in the past to get a judge to sign off.

I believe someone alleged on some website that they were concerned Manafort would destroy evidence. LOL See the first sentence.
Thanks from Jimmyb
Maverick is offline  
Old August 10th, 2017, 04:56 PM   #33
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: massachusetts
Posts: 8,412
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maverick View Post


Any financial info is redundant as banks are required to maintain it for years. It was a drama queen move by Mueller.

Mueller, with his passel of Clinton-Obama donors as his lawyers, and leaking grand jury information, information that is supposed to be secret.

Perhaps the reasons behind the warrant, the sworn reasons, will make interesting reading. As if the FBI hasn't made things up in the past to get a judge to sign off.

I believe someone alleged on some website that they were concerned Manafort would destroy evidence. LOL See the first sentence.

That's if the russians paid Manafort with checks he deposited in an American bank, the FBI could have been looking for evidence of offshore transactions.
Thanks from Camelot
goober is online now  
Old August 10th, 2017, 07:35 PM   #34
Senior Member
 
imaginethat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Western Slope, Colorado
Posts: 54,259
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maverick View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by imaginethat
Most? You're arguing that having "most" of the evidence is sufficient?

Unlike you, perhaps someone thought having ALL the evidence would be a good idea, that maybe the information withheld was incriminating, and that's why it was withheld.


Any financial info is redundant as banks are required to maintain it for years. It was a drama queen move by Mueller.

Mueller, with his passel of Clinton-Obama donors as his lawyers, and leaking grand jury information, information that is supposed to be secret.

Perhaps the reasons behind the warrant, the sworn reasons, will make interesting reading. As if the FBI hasn't made things up in the past to get a judge to sign off.

I believe someone alleged on some website that they were concerned Manafort would destroy evidence. LOL See the first sentence.
Did you major or minor in obfuscation?
Thanks from RNG
imaginethat is offline  
Old August 11th, 2017, 03:30 AM   #35
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,710
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clara007 View Post
It's a forum it's all opinion,
Thanks from webguy4 and caconservative
Sensible is offline  
Old August 11th, 2017, 03:32 AM   #36
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,710
Quote:
Originally Posted by RNG View Post
You were never satisfied with that approach if it was anything related to Hillary. Why the hypocrisy now?
When was that, before, or after the evidence came out against Hillary sir?
Sensible is offline  
Old August 11th, 2017, 07:14 AM   #37
Senior Member
 
imaginethat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Western Slope, Colorado
Posts: 54,259
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sabcat View Post
I know, the militarized police force is used w/ such restraint these days. They never kick in old lady's doors, shoot dogs or people.


https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20...nnection.shtml
You're delusional if you're suggesting kicking in the door or shooting his dog was the case with Manafort. No, not delusional, obfuscational. No surprise whatsoever.
imaginethat is offline  
Old August 11th, 2017, 09:20 AM   #38
RNG
Senior Member
 
RNG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: LA LA Land North
Posts: 25,308
Quote:
Originally Posted by imaginethat View Post
You're delusional if you're suggesting kicking in the door or shooting his dog was the case with Manafort. No, not delusional, obfuscational. No surprise whatsoever.
It is an assault on his King, after all.
RNG is offline  
Old August 11th, 2017, 10:03 AM   #39
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: California
Posts: 16,366
Quote:
Originally Posted by imaginethat View Post
You're delusional if you're suggesting kicking in the door or shooting his dog was the case with Manafort. No, not delusional, obfuscational. No surprise whatsoever.
In order for the FBI to acquire a search warrant, they had to believe there was evidence Manafort was hiding. It's been a few days now, any such evidence surfacing? I've heard nothing.
caconservative is online now  
Old August 11th, 2017, 10:10 AM   #40
Senior Member
 
Clara007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Arizona
Posts: 6,704
Quote:
Originally Posted by caconservative View Post
In order for the FBI to acquire a search warrant, they had to believe there was evidence Manafort was hiding. It's been a few days now, any such evidence surfacing? I've heard nothing.


OMGOSH--you ARE right. This is outrageous--shocking!! It's been an agonizing, never-ending, mind-blowing 48 HOURS.

So, there's an expiration date--shelf-life--on evidence collected by the FBI??

Who knew??
Clara007 is online now  
Reply

  Defending The Truth Political Forum > Political Forum > Current Events

Tags
fbi, home, manafort, paul, raids



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Trump Jr. and Manafort reach deal with Senate panel to avoid public hearing imaginethat Current Events 0 July 21st, 2017 03:56 PM
Paul Manafort's Russian ties should be alarming to everyone. GhostRider Current Events 19 March 25th, 2017 10:23 AM
The Manafort Pence connection GhostRider Americas 0 March 24th, 2017 07:07 PM
Manafort (finally) being investigated by FBI for Russian ties RNG Americas 5 August 19th, 2016 07:04 PM
FBI Raids Minnesota Home Full Of Molotov Cocktails, Suspected Pipe Bombs Mrs. CJ Parker Current Events 47 May 7th, 2013 09:42 AM


Facebook Twitter RSS Feed



Copyright © 2005-2013 Defending The Truth. All rights reserved.