Political Forums  

Go Back   Defending The Truth Political Forum > Political Forum > Current Events

Current Events Current Events Forum - Latest political news and events


Thanks Tree44Thanks
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old December 17th, 2017, 09:23 PM   #61
M(A)GA
 
Sabcat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Earth
Posts: 24,088
Quote:
Originally Posted by imaginethat View Post
You too?

Sexuality weaponized. The press weaponized. The FBI weaponized. Abortion weaponized. Immigration weaponized. Healthcare weaponized. Coal weaponized.

It's a weaponized world, and you're brain damaged to assert the weaponizing is happening only on one side.

Obama's birth certificate, weaponized. Obama's ears, weaponized............
What is postmodernism?


https://youtu.be/oL8MhYq9owo
Sabcat is offline  
Old December 17th, 2017, 09:30 PM   #62
Senior Member
 
justoneman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: chicago
Posts: 3,590
Quote:
Originally Posted by imaginethat View Post
You too?

Sexuality weaponized. The press weaponized. The FBI weaponized. Abortion weaponized. Immigration weaponized. Healthcare weaponized. Coal weaponized.

It's a weaponized world, and you're brain damaged to assert the weaponizing is happening only on one side.

Obama's birth certificate, weaponized. Obama's ears, weaponized............
Obama's ears weaponized. If a reporter was so foolish as to make some reference to Obama's big ears in an interview, he would give a death stare to the reporter.

Trumps hair wraponized. Trump talked openly about his hair and let Jimmy Fallon rough up his hair.

Trump cool.

Obama not cool.
justoneman is online now  
Old December 17th, 2017, 10:05 PM   #63
M(A)GA
 
Sabcat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Earth
Posts: 24,088
Quote:
Originally Posted by justoneman View Post
Obama's ears weaponized. If a reporter was so foolish as to make some reference to Obama's big ears in an interview, he would give a death stare to the reporter.

Trumps hair wraponized. Trump talked openly about his hair and let Jimmy Fallon rough up his hair.

Trump cool.

Obama not cool.
Well, they killed Joan rivers after she publicly called his "wife" a tranny...so?
Sabcat is offline  
Old December 18th, 2017, 03:29 PM   #64
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Lehigh Valley Pa.,USA
Posts: 7,363
Quote:
Originally Posted by imaginethat View Post
Gotcha. Yeah, fuck, what's a little pussy grabbing "here and there?" Whatabout JFK?

The election didn't settle the argument, but it showed a pattern that's not going away .... Roy Moore's election I'm talking about.
Has Trump grabbed any pontang while he has been in the White House??...NO?? Then why is it an issue??....Why was Gloria Allred's daughter, Lisa Bloom, found to be paying off mortgages for accusers of Trump??...Did the same thing happen with Moore??
Jimgorn is offline  
Old December 18th, 2017, 04:35 PM   #65
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: massachusetts
Posts: 10,147
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimgorn View Post
See you are assuming again, (which you are damned good at)....I seriously doubt that Hillary is ever going to get an orange jump-suit and a cot at Danville Conneticut....Or Comey, or Obama in the slammer for that matter....What is at stake here, though, is a Coup.....At this point I am convinced that there is an organized plot to de-legitimize a duly elected President going on right now....Even to the point of unwarranted impeachment..Which is endangering this country..In order to thwart that activity it is necessary to expose the previous administration's corrupt activity and demonstrate how those actions promote the current sedition...

And if Trump claims he grabbed a snatch here and there....So what??....I'll bet He learned it from JFK...Anyway, it is old news....The election should have settled that argument ...
Elections don't settle anything, they just set the stage for the next elections.
Things are going to get more and more volatile until we get to the point where we can rejigger the constitution. Until then, look for increasing instability.
The GOP hasn't passed any major legislation that was supported by a majority of the people since Bush's tax cuts.
They have been fighting to pass immensely unpopular legislation.
The repeal of ObamaCare, this tax cut those are opposed by the vast majority of the people.
That's a recipe for volatility.
goober is offline  
Old December 19th, 2017, 10:42 AM   #66
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: California
Posts: 17,483
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clara007 View Post
Sorry, Perry Mason. That code won't work becuzzzz Hillary didn't willfully intend to use the information to injure the U.S.
That's what Comey was saying.

Clinton never intended to impair our national defense. Clinton showed NO indication, NO evidence of endangering our country by sharing information with foreign countries.
Clinton was not involved in a conspiracy with others.

Comey: All the cases prosecuted involved some combination of clearly intentional and willful mishandling of classified information, or vast quantities of materials exposed in such a way as to support an inference of intentional misconduct, or indications of disloyalty to the United States… We do not see those things here.

Put on your thinking cap and use your detective eyes. See if you can figure this out using other historical cases:
"The Espionage Act has only sparingly been used to file criminal charges, but when it has been used it is often in high-profile cases. Eugene Debs was jailed under the Espionage Act for anti-war activities during World War I. The Rosenbergs were charged under the Espionage Act when they sold nuclear secrets to the Soviet Union. More recently, both Chelsea Manning and Edward Snowden were charged under the Espionage Act for providing classified material to WikiLeaks."
Only one person has even been charged under a gross negligence theory: FBI Agent James Smith. Smith carried on a 20-year affair with a Chinese national who was suspected of spying for Beijing, and Smith would bring classified material to their trysts, behavior far more reckless than anything Clinton is accused of. But Smith was not convicted of violating 793(f). He struck a plea agreement that resulted in a conviction to the lesser charge of lying to federal agents. Smith was sentenced to three months of home confinement and served no jail time.
In case your not aware, gross negligence does not need "intent". What does the Smith case tell us? Is it "on-point" with Hillary's gross negligence case? Not by any stretch of the imagination. Hillary put this entire nation at risk because she thought she was above the law!
caconservative is offline  
Old December 19th, 2017, 10:44 AM   #67
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: California
Posts: 17,483
Quote:
Originally Posted by goober View Post
Elections don't settle anything, they just set the stage for the next elections.
Things are going to get more and more volatile until we get to the point where we can rejigger the constitution. Until then, look for increasing instability.
The GOP hasn't passed any major legislation that was supported by a majority of the people since Bush's tax cuts.
They have been fighting to pass immensely unpopular legislation.
The repeal of ObamaCare, this tax cut those are opposed by the vast majority of the people.
That's a recipe for volatility.
Rejigger the Constitution? What does that mean? Do you mean, unlawfully rejigger it more that it already has been?
Thanks from Jimgorn
caconservative is offline  
Old December 19th, 2017, 11:35 AM   #68
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: massachusetts
Posts: 10,147
Quote:
Originally Posted by caconservative View Post
Rejigger the Constitution? What does that mean? Do you mean, unlawfully rejigger it more that it already has been?
That's not what I said.
It will take a wave election like we haven't seen in decades, to put a party in power in the White House, in the congress and in enough state houses to pass amendments at will.
So that the constitution can be changed to something that will work in the world going forward.
That's the best case, the worst case is total collapse of the rule of law, and a new consensus arising from the bloodshed.
Thanks from RNG
goober is offline  
Old December 20th, 2017, 04:54 AM   #69
Senior Member
 
Clara007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Arizona
Posts: 8,325
Quote:
Originally Posted by caconservative View Post
In case your not aware, gross negligence does not need "intent". What does the Smith case tell us? Is it "on-point" with Hillary's gross negligence case? Not by any stretch of the imagination. Hillary put this entire nation at risk because she thought she was above the law!


AHHH....BUT, we aren't dealing with GROSS NEGLIGENCE, are we?? We are dealing with the OFFICIAL statement by THEN DIRECTOR>>>James Comey.

EXTREME carelessness. Hillary did not collude. Hillary did not involve herself in a conspiracy. Hillary did not intentionally SHARE documents that would put our safety at risk. Hillary did not get PAID for documents. Hillary did not indicate any disloyalty to the U.S. Hillary was not in this for "GAIN".

Hillary was careless--in fact--EXTREMELY careless. That was the official finding. SO.....Let it be written. Let it be done.
Thanks from goober
Clara007 is offline  
Old December 20th, 2017, 05:14 AM   #70
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: massachusetts
Posts: 10,147
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clara007 View Post
AHHH....BUT, we aren't dealing with GROSS NEGLIGENCE, are we?? We are dealing with the OFFICIAL statement by THEN DIRECTOR>>>James Comey.

EXTREME carelessness. Hillary did not collude. Hillary did not involve herself in a conspiracy. Hillary did not intentionally SHARE documents that would put our safety at risk. Hillary did not get PAID for documents. Hillary did not indicate any disloyalty to the U.S. Hillary was not in this for "GAIN".

Hillary was careless--in fact--EXTREMELY careless. That was the official finding. SO.....Let it be written. Let it be done.
OK, see some people just can't decide whether to go with the official FBI final report, or the usually more reliable Breitbart Hit Piece, which is usually more reliably consistent with what they would prefer to believe......
Thanks from Clara007
goober is offline  
Reply

  Defending The Truth Political Forum > Political Forum > Current Events

Tags
emerges, farce, hillary, investigation



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Obama Commenetd on Hillary Investigation Baby Ray Current Events 5 May 17th, 2017 03:56 PM
Hillary’s State Dept. Blocked Investigation into Orlando Killer’s Mosque excalibur Current Events 10 June 14th, 2016 11:55 AM
Why Was Hillary Fired From the Watergate Investigation excalibur Current Events 1 January 18th, 2014 10:57 AM
LeBron James a farce highway80west Sports 21 August 7th, 2010 11:35 AM


Facebook Twitter RSS Feed



Copyright © 2005-2013 Defending The Truth. All rights reserved.