Political Forums  

Go Back   Defending The Truth Political Forum > Political Forum > Current Events

Current Events Current Events Forum - Latest political news and events


Thanks Tree22Thanks
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old July 13th, 2018, 03:12 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Missouri
Posts: 1,079
Socialism vs. Capitalism: Which is the Moral System

Socialism vs. Capitalism: Which is the Moral System

by C. Bradley Thompson

Throughout history there have been two basic forms of social organization: collectivism and individualism. In the twentieth-century collectivism has taken many forms: socialism, fascism, nazism, welfare-statism and communism are its more notable variations. The only social system commensurate with individualism is laissez-faire capitalism.

The extraordinary level of material prosperity achieved by the capitalist system over the course of the last two-hundred years is a matter of historical record. But very few people are willing to defend capitalism as morally uplifting.

It is fashionable among college professors, journalists, and politicians these days to sneer at the free-enterprise system. They tell us that capitalism is base, callous, exploitative, dehumanizing, alienating, and ultimately enslaving.

The intellectuals’ mantra runs something like this: In theory socialism is the morally superior social system despite its dismal record of failure in the real world. Capitalism, by contrast, is a morally bankrupt system despite the extraordinary prosperity it has created. In other words, capitalism at best, can only be defended on pragmatic grounds. We tolerate it because it works.

Under socialism a ruling class of intellectuals, bureaucrats and social planners decide what people want or what is good for society and then use the coercive power of the State to regulate, tax, and redistribute the wealth of those who work for a living. In other words, socialism is a form of legalized theft.

The morality of socialism can be summed-up in two words: envy and self-sacrifice. Envy is the desire to not only possess another’s wealth but also the desire to see another’s wealth lowered to the level of one’s own. Socialism’s teaching on self-sacrifice was nicely summarized by two of its greatest defenders, Hermann Goering and Bennito Mussolini. The highest principle of Nazism (National Socialism), said Goering, is: “Common good comes before private good.” Fascism, said Mussolini, is ” a life in which the individual, through the sacrifice of his own private interests…realizes that completely spiritual existence in which his value as a man lies.”

Socialism is the social system which institutionalizes envy and self-sacrifice: It is the social system which uses compulsion and the organized violence of the State to expropriate wealth from the producer class for its redistribution to the parasitical class.

Despite the intellectuals’ psychotic hatred of capitalism, it is the only moral and just social system.

Capitalism is the only moral system because it requires human beings to deal with one another as traders–that is, as free moral agents trading and selling goods and services on the basis of mutual consent.

Capitalism is the only just system because the sole criterion that determines the value of thing exchanged is the free, voluntary, universal judgement of the consumer. Coercion and fraud are anathema to the free-market system.
It is both moral and just because the degree to which man rises or falls in society is determined by the degree to which he uses his mind. Capitalism is the only social system that rewards merit, ability and achievement, regardless of one’s birth or station in life.

Yes, there are winners and losers in capitalism. The winners are those who are honest, industrious, thoughtful, prudent, frugal, responsible, disciplined, and efficient. The losers are those who are shiftless, lazy, imprudent, extravagant, negligent, impractical, and inefficient.

Capitalism is the only social system that rewards virtue and punishes vice. This applies to both the business executive and the carpenter, the lawyer and the factory worker.

But how does the entrepreneurial mind work? Have you ever wondered about the mental processes of the men and women who invented penicillin, the internal combustion engine, the airplane, the radio, the electric light, canned food, air conditioning, washing machines, dishwashers, computers, etc.?

What are the characteristics of the entrepreneur? The entrepreneur is that man or woman with unlimited drive, initiative, insight, energy, daring creativity, optimism and ingenuity. The entrepreneur is the man who sees in every field a potential garden, in every seed an apple. Wealth starts with ideas in people’s heads.

The entrepreneur is therefore above all else a man of the mind. The entrepreneur is the man who is constantly thinking of new ways to improve the material or spiritual lives of the greatest number of people.
And what are the social and political conditions which encourage or inhibit the entrepreneurial mind? The free-enterprise system is not possible without the sanctity of private property, the freedom of contract, free trade and the rule of law.
But the one thing that the entrepreneur values over all others is freedom–the freedom to experiment, invent and produce. The one thing that the entrepreneur dreads is government intervention. Government taxation and regulation are the means by which social planners punish and restrict the man or woman of ideas.

Welfare, regulations, taxes, tariffs, minimum-wage laws are all immoral because they use the coercive power of the state to organize human choice and action; they’re immoral because they inhibit or deny the freedom to choose how we live our lives; they’re immoral because they deny our right to live as autonomous moral agents; and they’re immoral because they deny our essential humanity. If you think this is hyperbole, stop paying your taxes for a year or two and see what happens.

The requirements for success in a free society demand that ordinary citizens order their lives in accordance with certain virtues–namely, rationality, independence, industriousness, prudence, frugality, etc. In a free capitalist society individuals must choose for themselves how they will order their lives and the values they will pursue. Under socialism, most of life’s decisions are made for you.

Both socialism and capitalism have incentive programs. Under socialism there are built-in incentives to shirk responsibility. There is no reason to work harder than anyone else becuase the rewards are shared and therefore minimal to the hard-working individual; indeed, the incentive is to work less than others because the immediate loss is shared and therefore minimal to the slacker.

Under capitalism, the incentive is to work harder because each producer will receive the total value of his production–the rewards are not shared. Simply put: socialism rewards sloth and penalizes hard work while capitalism rewards hard work and penalizes sloth.

According to socialist doctrine, there is a limited amount of wealth in the world that must be divided equally between all citizens. One person’s gain under such a system is another’s loss.

According to the capitalist teaching, wealth has an unlimited growth potential and the fruits of one’s labor should be retained in whole by the producer. But unlike socialism, one person’s gain is everybody’s gain in the capitalist system. Wealth is distributed unequally but the ship of wealth rises for everyone.

Sadly, America is no longer a capitalist nation. We live under what is more properly called a mixed economy–that is, an economic system that permits private property, but only at the discretion of government planners. A little bit of capitalism and a little bit of socialism.

When government redistributes wealth through taxation, when it attempts to control and regulate business production and trade, who are the winners and losers? Under this kind of economy the winners and losers are reversed: the winners are those who scream the loudest for a handout and the losers are those quiet citizens who work hard and pay their taxes.

As a consequence of our sixty-year experiment with a mixed economy and the welfare state, America has created two new classes of citizens. The first is a debased class of dependents whose means of survival is contingent upon the forced expropriation of wealth from working citizens by a professional class of government social planners. The forgotten man and woman in all of this is the quiet, hardworking, lawabiding, taxpaying citizen who minds his or her own business but is forced to work for the government and their serfs.

The return of capitalism will not happen until there is a moral revolution in this country. We must rediscover and then teach our young the virtues associated with being free and independent citizens. Then and only then, will there be social justice in America.

Socialism vs. Capitalism: Which is the Moral System | Ashbrook
sumara is offline  
Old July 13th, 2018, 03:15 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
noonereal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: NYC
Posts: 390
Who is the biased dumdass who wrote this?

Oh, Thomson.
noonereal is online now  
Old July 13th, 2018, 03:19 PM   #3
PragmaticBastard
 
GluteusMaximus's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 828
Capitalism is, quite easily, the most immoral economic system on Earth. The worship of wealth/money is what it's all about. How moral can that be?
Thanks from right to left and noonereal
GluteusMaximus is offline  
Old July 13th, 2018, 03:20 PM   #4
RNG
Senior Member
 
RNG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Between everywhere
Posts: 31,023
That essay glosses over the fact that unregulated capitalism exploits people as badly as poorly applied socialism or worse.

The whole socialism - capitalism thing is not, or perhaps more accurately should not be either/or. In fact I don't know of any pure socialist countries or any pure capitalist countries. In fact if you look at "successful" countries, and especially if you expand your definition of successful beyond just gross wealth, the successful countries all have some mix of both socialism and capitalism.
Thanks from GluteusMaximus and leekohler2
RNG is offline  
Old July 13th, 2018, 05:09 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
BubbaJones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Middle Tennessee
Posts: 7,755
NEITHER system is "moral". The first issue is defining what is or isn't "moral". You really can't. Why ? Because every single person on the planet practices some version of moral relativism .

What's considered moral, or maybe just acceptable or even barely tolerated, today, may very well be considered abhorrent and completely unacceptable tomorrow. And vice versa. Something that was considered totally unacceptable yesterday is considered laissez-faire today.

More to the point is situational morality. Is it ALWAYS wrong to steal ?? Most will say yes. But most would also commit such a crime if they or their children were starving. Same for killing someone. Most will say killing is always bad, except when you kill someone to prevent them from killing you. Then it's called justified. Even on something as fundamental as life and death "morality" is flexible. It's true of just about every other situation you could think of.

The second issue is, taken to even moderate extremes, both systems exploit people and resources. They ultimately wind up enriching the few at the expense of the rest.

All of the first order and frankly most of the second order, societies are hybrids. They are at their core capitalist but with varying amounts of socialism added in.

Imagine if every road was privately owned and you had to pay a toll to drive on them. It would be vastly more expensive to drive around than what we currently pay in gas taxes. Imagine if there were no public education and every single company had to teach their employees the basics ?? How to read, write and do math ?? How much more would everything cost ?? What if there were no police or fire protections ?? Or more accurately, you had to hire your own !!

So let's not pretend that either system has any pretense of morality. The only time they show signs of even the most basic of morality is when they are combined. When we stop the exploitation of the people and resources or at least reduce the negative impacts.

In my life experience, I would infinitely rather deal with an ETHICAL person, than one claiming morality.
BubbaJones is offline  
Old July 14th, 2018, 07:59 AM   #6
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Missouri
Posts: 1,079
Capitalism is the only moral system because it requires human beings to deal with one another as free moral agents trading and selling goods and services on the basis of mutual consent. Socialism always sounds good but has never worked nearly as well as Capitalism.
sumara is offline  
Old July 14th, 2018, 08:11 AM   #7
Senior Member
 
BubbaJones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Middle Tennessee
Posts: 7,755
Quote:
Originally Posted by sumara View Post
Capitalism is the only moral system because it requires human beings to deal with one another as free moral agents trading and selling goods and services on the basis of mutual consent. Socialism always sounds good but has never worked nearly as well as Capitalism.
Pure capitalism is as vile and destructive as any other system. Pick up a history book and read about the early industrial revolution. Read about CHILDREN getting paid pennies and working 12, 14 and even 18 hour shifts. Even then, whole families, similarly employed, could barely survive much less get a head. Get injured at work?? NOT the companies problem. You were fired and someone else was hired. Sexual abuse, or more accurately assault, against women at work was very common.

Your premise is that GREED is some how moral.
Thanks from RNG and Hollywood
BubbaJones is offline  
Old July 14th, 2018, 08:30 AM   #8
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Missouri
Posts: 1,079
You can't argue with the success of Capitalism.

250 years ago, 99% of the entire world was poor. Capitalism came and brought about massive wealth and quality of life improvements all over the world.
In just the last 30 years, capitalism raised over 1 BILLION people out of poverty.

Socialist thinking is what led to over 100 million people being killed in the 20th century...all in the name of equal outcomes and fairness. It just doesn't work.
Thanks from webguy4 and Sabcat
sumara is offline  
Old July 14th, 2018, 08:37 AM   #9
RNG
Senior Member
 
RNG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Between everywhere
Posts: 31,023
Quote:
Originally Posted by sumara View Post
You can't argue with the success of Capitalism.

250 years ago, 99% of the entire world was poor. Capitalism came and brought about massive wealth and quality of life improvements all over the world.
In just the last 30 years, capitalism raised over 1 BILLION people out of poverty.

Socialist thinking is what led to over 100 million people being killed in the 20th century...all in the name of equal outcomes and fairness. It just doesn't work.
You can't prove that the technology explosion that caused the wealth explosion were due to capitalism.

In fact, as was pointed out, initially this technology explosion was the impetus to the gross immoral abuse of workers, especially children.

It took a couple of good socialist concepts, unions and regulations to force the capitalists to at least pretend to have some morals.
Thanks from Hollywood
RNG is offline  
Old July 14th, 2018, 09:06 AM   #10
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: USA
Posts: 1,979
Your title should be: socialism vs free enterprise, free trade or free market

Quote:
Originally Posted by sumara View Post
Socialism vs. Capitalism: Which is the Moral System

by C. Bradley Thompson

Throughout history there have been two basic forms of social organization: collectivism and individualism. ………….
.

I would like to point out the word “capitalism” was unknown to our founders. In fact it was used and popularized by Karl Marx to describe a free market system in an evil light. By contrast, our founder’s often describe our system in a manner promoting a free market, free trade, or free enterprise ___ “free” being the operative word. For example see Thomas Jefferson : First Annual Message to Congress


”Agriculture, manufactures, commerce, and navigation, the four pillars of our prosperity, are the most thriving when left most free to individual enterprise.”


I have never found our founders using the word “capitalism” to describe our system. In fact, the very reason for granting power to Congress to “regulate commerce” among the States was to protect and advance free trade among the States by forbidding one state taxing another state’s exports which passed through its borders. This is further illustrated in Article 1, Section 9 which declares: "No Preference shall be given by any Regulation of Commerce or Revenue to the Ports of one States over those of another; nor shall Vessels bound to, or from, one States, be obliged to enter, clear, or pay Duties in another."



But our progressive/socialist domestic enemies do not like the word “free” being used to describe our economic system because it is hard to attack the word “free” which clearly implies the people are to be “free” to engage in commerce and freely trade with their mutual consent ___ an original inalienable right of mankind. “Capitalism” on the other hand gives great latitude to cast America’s system in an evil light, particularly as a system manipulated by evil “Crony Capitalists”.

For more on the distinction between our system, as intended by our Founders, and “Capitalism”, see: PART TWO: Free Enterprise is Better than Capitalism


JWK



The freedom to fail or succeed at one’s own hand is a PROGRESSIVE`S nightmare and not the American Dream

Thanks from sumara and Sabcat
johnwk is offline  
Reply

  Defending The Truth Political Forum > Political Forum > Current Events

Tags
capitalism, moral, socialism, system



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Capitalism For The Poor Socialism For The Rich Comes To Brazil skews13 Current Events 1 May 24th, 2016 10:20 AM
Chile vs Venezuela, Capitalism vs Socialism Sabcat Socialism 4 May 22nd, 2016 08:35 AM
American Capitalism A Disaster With No Moral Center skews13 Americas 233 November 5th, 2015 11:52 PM
Moral dilemma of Socialism coke Current Events 0 November 4th, 2015 11:16 PM
Evolution not Revolution Part 1 Capitalism or Socialism ? modszhrafow Political Ideologies 2 November 21st, 2012 12:57 AM


Facebook Twitter RSS Feed



Copyright © 2005-2013 Defending The Truth. All rights reserved.