Political Forums  

Go Back   Defending The Truth Political Forum > Political Issues > Money and Finance > Debt


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old June 19th, 2012, 06:20 PM   #41
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 654
So what do you make of the explosions, one after the other, right before the building began its free descent?
Radicalcentrist is offline  
Old June 19th, 2012, 07:52 PM   #42
Fayt Storm ON [OFF]
 
Fayt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Not in MD
Posts: 15,741
OMG if you want to speak to me about my opinions on the events of 911, make a thread. A libertarian and a conspiracy theorist, that's just too much. From imaginethat's 1 solution fits all to 911 conspiracies, wtf.
Fayt is offline  
Old June 20th, 2012, 02:53 AM   #43
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 654
I asked you one simple question, Fayt. It is that simple. I did not ask for your theory on 911. I asked you specifically about the explosions inside the building. Why are you avoiding answering my question?
Radicalcentrist is offline  
Old June 20th, 2012, 03:34 AM   #44
Senior Member
 
imaginethat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Western Slope, Colorado
Posts: 53,311
Quote:
Originally Posted by Radicalcentrist View Post
I asked you one simple question, Fayt. It is that simple. I did not ask for your theory on 911. I asked you specifically about the explosions inside the building. Why are you avoiding answering my question?


Because any answer that isn't the standard answer, and any answer that doesn't affirm that higher taxes on the rich and federal spending are cure-alls for all of America's ills scares the hell out of Fayt, and most liberal Ds who think they have ALL the answers, well, all the answers that matter.



Higher tariffs, too. Oh, and "nationalizing" the Fed.....
imaginethat is offline  
Old June 20th, 2012, 04:52 AM   #45
Eyes Wide Open
 
waitingtables's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: NJ
Posts: 44,991
You do realize that when the floors were falling, it was sounding like explosions, right, and causing force outwards? If RC you believe that it was a planned event, may I ask you just who you think was behind it? And why? Maybe you should actually start your own thread about it since this isn't the right place for it?
waitingtables is offline  
Old June 20th, 2012, 07:47 AM   #46
Banned
 
garysher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 34,677
Quote:
Originally Posted by Radicalcentrist View Post
So what do you make of the explosions, one after the other, right before the building began its free descent?




Sure it was a planned demolition.



Planned after the twin towers had fallen that morning and that building had been rendered unsafe.



They spent several hours installing demolition charges and then brought the building down in a controlled fashion late in the afternoon of 9/11, rather than wait for it to collapse and put even more lives in danger.



In other words Building 7 was quantitavely eased to the ground
garysher is offline  
Old June 20th, 2012, 09:38 AM   #47
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 654
Quote:
Originally Posted by gary View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Radicalcentrist' timestamp='1340158811' post='408384

So what do you make of the explosions, one after the other, right before the building began its free descent?




Sure it was a planned demolition.



Planned after the twin towers had fallen that morning and that building had been rendered unsafe.



They spent several hours installing demolition charges and then brought the building down in a controlled fashion late in the afternoon of 9/11, rather than wait for it to collapse and put even more lives in danger.



In other words Building 7 was quantitavely eased to the ground


Here's the problem, Gary. It would take demolitions EXPERTS to design the charging and install it, WHICH WOULD HAVE TAKEN MANY WEEKS, IF NOT MORE. That means those charges were already set prior to September 11. The fire department has no one that could have done that work, which ended up in a perfect implosion, perfect. It was perfectly designed, and perfectly executed.



Now knowing that, what can we further conclude?



And WT, watch the video again. Violent explosions occur, blowing out the windows on 15 or 20 floors, all synchronized, BEFORE and floors begain to fall. So it WAS explosions that you hear, not floors collapsing. Watch it again.



Now here is the opposite side of the same building, at 5:20 PM, on the afternoon of 911. Notice that at the very same time that the explosions occured on the opposite side of the building, generating visible fire balls, Those same exploding charges, preset, blew out the windows on this side, and the building then collapsed, a controlled demolition that had to be set before 911.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LD06SAf0p9A
Radicalcentrist is offline  
Old June 20th, 2012, 12:26 PM   #48
Senior Member
 
imaginethat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Western Slope, Colorado
Posts: 53,311
Quote:
Originally Posted by waitingtables View Post
You do realize that when the floors were falling, it was sounding like explosions, right, and causing force outwards? If RC you believe that it was a planned event, may I ask you just who you think was behind it? And why? Maybe you should actually start your own thread about it since this isn't the right place for it?


This is RC's thread so it's his call as to what fits.



All those questions you asked are fine, worthy, but a lack of firm answers for those questions don't determine whether or not demotions occurred or if the official story is true. I mean, don't you know that nano-thermite residues have been found in the WTC dust? Haven't you seen the steel beams that sure as hell look like they were cut by thermite?







Have you seen the molten metal flowing down the building before the collapse? Take a look down this page a bit. The debunkers say, it's aluminum from the planes ... only, molten aluminum is silver in color.



Have you done any research whatsoever WT? Have you heard the explosions on many, many videos? Some definitely occur before building collapse. Some were heard way before, some were heard in the basements.



Really, you need not answer any of my questions, because anyone who does research, who examines the Pentagon impact flight path, and the guy who supposedly pulled off a maneuver that would be borderline impossible for an excellent pilot, on and on....



It's pretty clear that you have bought into "Any explanation other than the official one is a conspiracy theory."



The true conspiracy theory is that things happened the way the government explained they happened. That takes real leaps of faith, and ignoring heaps of evidence. But, it's a "comfortable" explanation, so many buy it.
imaginethat is offline  
Old June 20th, 2012, 01:13 PM   #49
Fayt Storm ON [OFF]
 
Fayt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Not in MD
Posts: 15,741
Quote:
Originally Posted by Radicalcentrist View Post
I asked you one simple question, Fayt. It is that simple. I did not ask for your theory on 911. I asked you specifically about the explosions inside the building. Why are you avoiding answering my question?


I'll answer your questions with my own set of evidence proving you wrong once you agree that my economic solutions to bring our economy back is needed over austerity and Supply Side Economics. Mainly Raise taxes, invest in our infrastructure, increase unionization and change our trade policies.



Agree to that 1st and I'll provide you information about 911 that will change your view.
Fayt is offline  
Old June 20th, 2012, 01:15 PM   #50
Banned
 
garysher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 34,677
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fayt View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Radicalcentrist' timestamp='1340189635' post='408409

I asked you one simple question, Fayt. It is that simple. I did not ask for your theory on 911. I asked you specifically about the explosions inside the building. Why are you avoiding answering my question?


I'll answer your questions with my own set of evidence proving you wrong once you agree that my economic solutions to bring our economy back is needed over austerity and Supply Side Economics. Mainly Raise taxes, invest in our infrastructure, increase unionization and change our trade policies.



Agree to that 1st and I'll provide you information about 911 that will change your view.




Increasing unionisation will definitely require a rise in taxation.



Why are you so sure that ending the Bush tax cuts will solve all our economic problems?



The additional tax revenue doesn't begin to come anywhere near to closing the budget deficit
garysher is offline  
Reply

  Defending The Truth Political Forum > Political Issues > Money and Finance > Debt

Tags
bears, couple, easing, explained, humorously, quantitative



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Poll shows raw feelings easing over health law msnbc.com Current Events 2 January 17th, 2011 05:43 PM
House to vote on bill easing stem cell restrictions CNN Current Events 1 June 7th, 2007 08:12 AM


Facebook Twitter RSS Feed



Copyright © 2005-2013 Defending The Truth. All rights reserved.