Political Forums  

Go Back   Defending The Truth Political Forum > Political Issues > Money and Finance > Economics


Thanks Tree11Thanks
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old April 17th, 2016, 11:19 AM   #11
Banned
 
fdtwain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Europe
Posts: 618
Finally, extremism as defined by the council of Europe as refusal to follow commonly accepted ways of life and values is not a crime, nor does it warrant any attention of the CIA, the NSA or the FBI. The United States was founded by men and women, many of whom were extremists and proud of it. Hence, the constitutional rights of extremists so defined, who are US citizens, shall be protected to the fullest extent in the United States of America by the US federal government and by the US department of state overseas, as long as no abominable deeds of sexual perversions (homosexuality, lesbianism, bestiality, incest, pedophilia (sexual relations with girls below 12 years of age)), abominations (child murders (abortions), change of gender, cannibalism, human cloning), intentional murder, enslavement of men/women or selling of men/women to slavery are committed by them. If there are conflicts over ways of life between extremists, who are US citizens, and foreign nations, foreign nations should be asked to drop civil or criminal prosecutions and expel extremists who are US citizens, or simply not let them into their territory in the first place.

In dealing with foreign extremists so defined who come to the United States because their life or freedom is put in danger due to exercising derivative-natural rights to absolute freedom of speech, freedom of peaceful assembly and association, freedom of Christian religion, freedom of conscience, the US state department should encourage the foreign state the jurisdiction of which foreign extremists flee to offer a reasonable accommodation to foreign extremists, removing danger to life and freedom to foreign extremists in retaliation of exercising derivative-natural rights to absolute freedom of speech, freedom of peaceful assembly and association, freedom of Christian religion, freedom of conscience, as long as the abominable deeds of sexual perversions (homosexuality, lesbianism, bestiality, incest, pedophilia (sexual relations with girls below 12 years of age)), abominations (child murders (abortions), change of gender, cannibalism, human cloning), intentional murder, enslavement of men/women or selling of men/women to slavery. If such a foreign state utterly refuses to offer a reasonable accommodation to foreign extremists, such foreign extremists should be granted temporary protection from deportation until a reasonable accommodation by a foreign state is granted.

In dealing with requests for cooperation of foreign states on extremist individuals and organizations so defined, especially from Russia and China, the United States of America shall automatically reject such requests, informing foreign states that extremism is not a crime in the United States, but a constitutionally protected activity, as such requests conceal political repressions against undesirable individuals, who dissent from the policies of their states and encourage dialogue between foreign states and extremist individuals and organizations so defined with a view of finding reasonable accommodation, acceptable to both parties, and respectful of derivative-natural rights to absolute freedom of speech, freedom of peaceful assembly and association, freedom of Christian religion, freedom of conscience of extremist individuals and organizations.

In dealing with extremism, it is important to remember that for the United States of America the provisions of the US constitution, including amendments to the US constitution, are superior to international law, including the UN Charter. This means that US extremist organizations so defined, even if run contrary to the goals and purposes of the UN, and engaging in voluntary self-segregation, are entitled to the fullest extent to the protection of the constitutional rights of their members who are US citizens, guaranteed by the constitution of the United States, and to the protection of the derivative-natural rights to absolute freedom of speech, freedom of peaceful assembly and association, freedom of Christian religion, freedom of conscience, the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms of US citizens and residents and the civil right of US citizens to organize, train and arm the self-defense militias of the American people, and are free to pursue their objectives and purposes even if their objectives and purposes are contrary to international law, including the UN Charter, as long as such organizations do not engage in genocide or aggressive war. Similarly the activities of foreign extremist organizations and individuals so defined shall not be interfered with by United States agents overseas. The United States of America is not in a war and will never be in a war against extremism so defined, and extremists so defined made great contributions to the economic development of the United States, developing new lifestyles and ways of life that have since become a part of the diverse American people and creating their parallel societies to gradually become American communities, even if autonomous and self-governed as the Amish. Hence the US senator Barry Goldwater is correct in his saying that extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice, and moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue, and this saying of the honorable American statesmen should properly and wisely guide the US policy in approach to extremism.

Additionally, the United States of America shall adjust its stance on so-called anti-semitism: while violence against jews as any other human beings should be countered, criticism of jews shall not be silenced by means of the United States government policies. Thus, the United States shall assist jewish organizations and individuals solely in the situations where life and freedom of the jews is in danger, and shall not prevent individuals, organizations, people and states from criticizing the jews, Israel or the so-called holocaust, shall not prevent peoples or states from asking the jews to voluntarily repatriate from a particular state to Israel or a third country. Instead, the United States of America shall concentrate on promotion of the derivative-natural rights to absolute freedom of speech, freedom of peaceful assembly and association, freedom of Christian religion, freedom of conscience, the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms of citizens and residents of a state throughout the world as a realistic means to reduce armed conflicts and civil strife.

A good example of the appropriate US policy towards extremism is the bequest of Robert McCorkell towards the US civil association, the national alliance, improperly classified as a terrorist organization by the FBI, which the jewish thieves residing in Canada try to steal with the assistance of crooked lawyers. The United States of America shall exercise appropriate pressure upon the Canadian government to see the bequeathed estate swiftly transferred to the US civil association, the national alliance, in accordance with its unconditional duty to protect the interests of US citizens, in particular, the movable physical property of US citizens that has objective intrinsic and market value abroad, even if such interests are in conflict with foreign laws prohibiting or criminalizing the conduct political or non-criminal in nature as well as to permit the remains of Mr. Robert McCorkell, who voiced many objections with regard to the policies of the Canadian government, to be transferred and buried in the United States of America in accordance with his wishes.

Another good example of the appropriate US policy towards extremism is the story of the Romeike family from Germany - a Christian homeschooling family prosecuted by the German government for failure to enroll their children to public schools. The parental right to direct education of their children is a natural right, but even not addressing this, an important issue causing the Romeike flight was overlooked by US journalists: German government schools are unsafe where mobbing, violence and rape of German children by non-German children is tolerated by many German school administrators. It is obvious that Germany should first secure its government schools before forcing children to enroll in German government schools, and not to refuse Christian homeschooling families as the Romeike their natural right to direct the education of their children. And while Germany is entitled to conduct its internal affairs as it sees fit, and Germany is a friendly nation to the United States of America, the United States of America will not expel extremists as the Romeike family, freely choosing to live separately and peacefully from other nationals in accordance with their ways of life, values, customs and traditions, and prosecuted by their governments placing their life and freedom in danger, until their governments find reasonable accommodation, acceptable to both extremist individuals and their governments, and respectful of the derivative-natural rights to absolute freedom of speech, freedom of peaceful assembly and association, freedom of Christian religion, freedom of conscience of extremist individuals.

Finally, a good example of the appropriate US policy towards extremism is the recurring problem of the library of Russia’s born rabbi Shneerson, confiscated by communist thieves after the Bolshevik revolution, of which the zionist extremist group, chabad, claims ownership. The members of chabad committed intentional murders and rapes of children of both sexes below 12 years of age, and against the members of chabad many criminal cases were opened in a number of foreign states, including those resulting in convictions and supported by the objective and compelling physical evidence proving beyond reasonable doubt that the members of chabad engaged in ritual sacrifice of Christian children in satanic cabbalistic rituals involving addition of Christian blood to jewish bread. It is difficult to imagine what can be learned out of the talmudic scripts that advise their believers to kill the best non-jews and corrupt the best non-jewesses, yet such talmudic scripts are physical objects that are reportedly sold in the market for thousands of US dollars. Therefore the government of the United States should request Russia to return the library of Russia’s born rabbi Shneerson to chabad, protecting the movable physical property of US citizens that has objective market value.

It is obvious that the FBI should be thoroughly cleared of those who hold in contempt the constitutionally-protected rights of American citizens, even if worthless and repugnant ones, as long as such committed no abominable deeds of sexual perversions (homosexuality, lesbianism, bestiality, incest, pedophilia (sexual relations with girls below 12 years of age)), abominations (child murders (abortions), change of gender, cannibalism, human cloning), intentional murder, enslavement of men/women or selling of men/women to slavery.

Fourth, fatal drone attacks shall be authorized solely outside the United States, with regard to terrorists and militants who personally committed the abominable deeds of sexual perversions (homosexuality, lesbianism, bestiality, incest, pedophilia (sexual relations with girls below 12 years of age)), abominations (child murders (abortions), change of gender, cannibalism, human cloning), intentional murder, enslavement of men/women or selling of men/women to slavery, if such cannot be captured, by the secretary of defense in association with the director of the CIA in accordance with due process of law proper in such cases. No drone attack shall be authorized with regards to Christian priests and bishops, unless such commit the abominable deeds of sexual perversions (homosexuality, lesbianism, bestiality, incest, pedophilia (sexual relations with girls below 12 years of age)), abominations (child murders (abortions), change of gender, cannibalism, human cloning), intentional murder, enslavement of men/women or selling of men/women to slavery. While executing a drone attack, reasonable care should be exercised to avoid the killing of civilians, in particular women and children below 12 years of age.

Fifth, collection of financial information by US federal agencies shall be permitted solely subject to a court order issued upon a probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and describing in particular the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized - that is, with regard to particular persons and places for federal felony investigations by the FBI or foreign intelligence purposes by the NSA.

Another danger is the newly created US consumer financial protection bureau, which, under the pretense of protection of consumer rights, collects credit card information on consumer purchases and feeds the collected information into huge mathematical and statistical databases of the US economy in order to create consumer profiles and adjust the US economic policy to promote desirable and hinder undesirable consumption patterns, economically destroying US citizens it regards as undesirable in the process. This bureau should not be permitted to collect credit card information of US customers.

Sixth, exchange of personal information with foreign states shall be restricted solely to instances of criminal conduct, non-political in nature, recognized in the past and still recognized as criminal by civilized nations, and terrorist investigations. No exchange of personal information with foreign states shall take place with regard to extremists so defined, and no exchange of personal information with regard to militants shall take place, unless a militant group is proven by objective and compelling physical evidence beyond a reasonable doubt to be carrying terrorist attacks, yet even in such circumstances no exchange of personal information with China and Russia on militants shall have place, given the risks of misuse of personal information to target political dissenters.

It is important to restrict US defense and security cooperation with China and Russia to issues related to control and non-proliferation of nuclear, chemical and biological weapons of mass destruction, criminal conduct, non-political in nature, recognized in the past and still recognized as criminal by civilized nations, and terrorist investigations, and exercise care with regard to such US defense and security cooperation with China and Russia, given completely different approaches to security taken by China and Russia.

If necessary, a US law shall be drafted and passed by US Congress, restricting defense and security cooperation with China and Russia to issues related to control and non-proliferation of nuclear, chemical and biological weapons of mass destruction, criminal conduct, non-political in nature, recognized in the past and still recognized as criminal by civilized nations, and terrorist investigations

Seventh, so-called cyber threats and new threats shall be ignored by the NSA, the CIA and the FBI. These non-existent so-called cyber threats, invented by parasitic bureaucrats to justify their existence, can be addressed by the private sector, reasonable IT security measures and state civil laws. Nor is the so-called theft of US intellectual property important: in fact, the US patent service was too liberal in approving patents, and US patenting protection shall be limited to inventions of physical objects or physical devices that can be realized in an industrial model, for the term of seven years, renewable for another seven years. Similarly, US copyright protection should be limited to trade marks and shall not in any wise be granted to obscene images and recordings, depicting sexual intercourse with joined sexual organs of men and women. The US Foreign Service should concentrate on protection of rights of inventors of physical objects or physical devices that can be realized in an industrial model for the term of no more than 14 years from the patenting date and corporate trade marks: all other copyright and patenting protection shall be advanced by trade associations.

Eighth, the US foreign intelligence court should take great care not to become star chambers, and to approve solely such surveillance as warranted by a probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and describing in particular the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized - that is, with regard to particular persons and places for federal felony investigations by the FBI or foreign intelligence purposes by the NSA.

Furthermore, the US foreign intelligence court shall compile an annual report to the US congressional intelligence committee, describing its activities for the year. Next the provision of the NDAA permitting indefinite detention of US citizens should be repealed. US citizens inside the United States are subject to the jurisdiction of federal courts, while US citizens overseas, if detained, should be transferred to the jurisdiction of US federal courts or US military courts within 13 months after detention.

Additionally, the United States of America needs to gain control of its border with Mexico, constructing the automated border protection system and placing the US national guard on US-Mexico border, if necessary. Furthermore, all legal immigrants who committed felonies and illegal immigrants, except for those immigrants who married the US citizens and produced children in marriage should be repatriated to their native lands or safe third countries, if their life and freedom are in danger in their native lands because of their political or religious activities. Attempts to pass amnesty for illegal migrants, except for those immigrants who married the US citizens and produced children in marriage, should not be undertaken: amnesty will only encourage more illegal immigrants to come to the United States of America, and already tens of millions of US citizens willing to work are unemployed. Furthermore, the program of voluntary repatriation of US citizens of non-European descent to their native lands shall be established within the United States of America.

The United States of America needs to review its laws to secure the blessings of liberty to US citizens, in particular:

The derivative-natural rights to absolute freedom of speech, written and spoken words, freedom of peaceful assembly and association, freedom of Christian religion, shall be recognized as a part of dignity of man and all federal and state laws inconsistent with these derivative-natural rights repealed.

The derivative-natural rights to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms of US citizens, shall be recognized with regard to the following personal weapons: knives, handguns, semi-automatic and automatic weapons, machine guns, portable grenade launchers, portable rocket launchers, portable anti-aircraft missiles, portable anti-tank missiles, portable naval missiles, appropriate munitions and explosives, light military vehicles and warboats.

With regard to restrictions, registration with the governments of US states can be required with regard to portable grenade launchers, portable rocket launchers, portable anti-aircraft missiles, portable anti-tank missiles, portable naval missiles, and certain high powered explosives. With regard to all other personal weapons, including automatic weapons and machine guns, no restrictions are constitutionally permissible, and any registration requirements are constitutionally prohibited, and shall be repealed. Similarly, the United States cannot prohibit convicted felons and the criminally insane persons who committed felonies from keeping and bearing arms if it recognizes such persons as citizens of the United States. The United States can and should, however, withdraw citizenship rights from convicted felons and criminally insane persons, who committed felonies on US soil, in accordance with the judgments of US courts: such persons should lose their US citizenship rights if convicted of a felony in trial by jury, which has always been the US government policy in the past. Similarly, the US government can require gun manufacturers to provide to customers a firearm safety course as a part of purchase: the NRA administers many such firearm safety courses across the United States.

The civil right of US citizens to organize, train and arm the self-defense militias of the American people shall be recognized, such self-defense militias encouraged to become part of the national guard of US states, and lawful independent self-defense militias not harassed by US district and state governments or the US federal government.

Gold and silver coins and bullion shall be established legal tender within US states.

Appropriate US state and federal laws shall be passed to prohibit forceful imposition of electronic numbers for taxpayers and social security identification, forceful imposition of any marks, numbers, writings, microchips upon human skin or inside human body for any reason, forceful collection and storage of biometric information as fingerprints, eye scan, DNA-samples, without a written court order supported by clear and compelling evidence sufficient to accuse of felony a person from whom biometric evidence is collected in the territory of the United States. US citizens shall be given an option to be accounted for tax and social security purposes under their names, birthdates, places of birth and digital photographs, which are sufficient. Furthermore, prosecution of those who wound and kill the persons who forcefully impose any marks, numbers, writings, microchips upon human skin or inside human body for any reason shall be prohibited in the territory of the United States of America.

The American people should remain moral if American freedom is to be preserved, therefore:

A death penalty in all cases shall be established and imposed upon the doers of the abominable deeds of sexual perversions (homosexuality, lesbianism, bestiality, incest, pedophilia (sexual relations with girls below 12 years of age)), abominations (child murders (abortions), change of gender, cannibalism, human cloning), intentional murder, enslavement of men/women or selling of men/women to slavery in the territory of the United States of America. Furthermore, prosecution of those who take the property, wound and kill the doers of the abominable deeds of sexual perversions (homosexuality, lesbianism, bestiality, incest, pedophilia (sexual relations with girls below 12 years of age)), abominations (child murders (abortions), change of gender, cannibalism, human cloning), intentional murder, enslavement of men/women or selling of men/women to slavery shall be prohibited in the territory of United States of America.

Prostitution and production and selling of pornography shall be outlawed in the territory of the United States of America by appropriate state laws.

Finally, one year mandatory counseling should be established by appropriate state laws before divorce is granted.

The United Nations organization is in dire need of reform, therefore:

- a great regional power of India shall be admitted to permanent membership within the UN security council;
- the mission of the UN shall be limited to limitation of nuclear weapons, destruction of chemical and biological weapons of mass destruction, stopping genocide and aggressive war by appropriate measures, and promotion of human rights in the nations of the world;
- various UN bodies not connected to the above-mentioned limited mission of the UN as unesco, unicef, etc., shall be either dissolved or transferred into separate international organizations independent from UN.

Really important is the principled US stand towards the United Nations organization: the UN is an international organization of independent and sovereign states, not a world government in the making, and not a god or gods, and the UN shall tolerate and respect the existence of individuals, organizations, peoples, nations, states and international organizations that reject its values, voluntarily refuse to participate in its activities even if such individuals, organizations, peoples, nations, states and international organizations undertake the policies contrary to the goals and purposes of the United Nations, as long as such individuals, organizations, peoples, nations, states and international organizations do no engage in aggressive war or genocide. Therefore, the United States of America shall politely request so that the UN remove from its charter and international treaties all provisions inconsistent with the derivative-natural rights to absolute freedom of speech, freedom of peaceful assembly and association, freedom of Christian religion, freedom of conscience, the derivative-natural right of citizens and residents of a state to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms, and focus its policies upon its original mission of suppression of aggressive war and genocide, limitation of nuclear weapons, and worldwide prohibition and destruction of chemical and biological weapons, and shall develop and deposit with the UN appropriate reservations with regard to the UN charter and treaties, protecting the constitutionally protected rights of American citizens and residents.

Such a UN reform does not turn the UN into the League of Nations, which was powerless to stop genocide and aggressive war, but limits UN jurisdiction to matters of genuine international concern wherein swift international action is required with appropriate mechanisms to enforce UN decisions, while denying the UN means to overextend its mission and transfer itself into a world government.

Republican, conservative, nationalist, patriotic and fundamentalist US citizens shall record all violations of US federal and state laws by the obama administration, shall report them to US citizens and shall prosecute all US officials responsible in US federal and state courts to the fullest extent of US laws, rejecting any compromises and forcing final judgment to be rendered by US courts. Furthermore, republican, conservative, nationalist, patriotic and fundamentalist US citizens shall record all violations of US federal and state laws and all violations of US citizens and residents by zionist criminal organization adl and democratic criminal organization splc, shall report them to US citizens and shall prosecute all adl and splc employees, responsible and those US officials cooperating with them, in US federal and state courts to the fullest extent of US laws, rejecting any compromise and forcing final judgment to be rendered by US courts. Finally, in all US district, state and federal elections firm, consistent and uncompromising republican, conservative, nationalist, patriotic and fundamentalist candidates shall be nominated by the republican party of the United States of America to fight in political struggle against zionist, masonic, democratic, communist, socialist and colored candidates nominated by the US democratic party to give the Americans a real political choice to make in free district, state and federal elections.

The United States of America indeed lives through perilous times, but American freedom can be preserved by swift, consistent and severe action by republican, conservative, nationalist, patriotic and fundamentalist US citizens against zionists, masons, democrats, communists, socialists, coloreds who are attacking American freedom. For this, it is important to understand that in the world there will no longer be superpowers, but two first-class great powers, US and China, independent nation-states, great regional powers, regional integration organizations, without the UN or with the UN of limited mission. It is important not to fear the prolonged shutdown of the US federal government: the obama administration may well be forced by US Congress to undertake painful measures to reduce government spending in line with government revenues to balance the US government budget as the US debt limit will not be raised any longer, and in the interim the US federal government may well remain shut down, which is not a tragedy but an opportunity, given that Belgium lived nearly two years without any government. Yet America is a truly great and exceptional Christian nation and can preserve American freedom, remaining a shining city of freedom upon the hill of justice, illuminating the way to prosperity for the nations of the world.
fdtwain is offline  
Old April 17th, 2016, 11:20 AM   #12
Banned
 
fdtwain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Europe
Posts: 618
Standing against the UN arms trade treaty

At the conclusion of the U.S.-EU Summit held this week in Brussels, obama and his European interlocutors released a joint statement reaffirming their common commitment to civilian disarmament as mandated in the United Nation’s arms trade treaty (ATT).

There is a provision at the end of the statement that is of much greater concern to Americans, aware of the crescendo of calls for restrictions on the right to keep and bear arms. Paragraph 33 of the declaration released on March 26 states: “We reaffirm our joint commitments on non-proliferation, disarmament and arms control.” Among other agreements, obama, in the name of the United States, joined with the gathered heads of states in promising: "We will also work together to promote the entry into force of the arms trade treaty in 2014." Despite significant congressional opposition to the United Nation’s attempt to confiscate privately owned weapons and ammunition, obama quietly signed his name to the document.

In order to appreciate the seriousness of the arms trade treaty’s threat to the God-given right to keep and bear arms and to the constitutional protection of that right, details of the plan should be understood.

First, the ATT seeks to grant control over all weaponry in the hands of the very entity, government, responsible for over 300 million murders in the 20th century. One uncomfortable fact of armed violence, ignored by the UN in its pro-disarmament propaganda, is that all murders committed by all serial killers in history do not amount to a fraction of the brutal killings committed by authorized state parties using the very weapons over which they seek to exercise control under the terms of the arms trade treaty.

Article 2 of the ATT defines the scope of the treaty’s prohibitions. The right to own, buy, sell, trade, or transfer weapons is granted to the states by this section of the arms trade treaty.

Article 3 places the “ammunition/munitions fired, launched or delivered by the conventional arms covered under Article 2” within the scope of the treaty’s prohibitions, as well.

Article 4 rounds out the regulations, also placing all “parts and components” of weapons within the scheme.

Perhaps the most immediate threat to the rights of gun owners in the ATT is found in Article 5. Under the title of “General Implementation,” Article 5 mandates that all countries participating in the treaty “shall establish and maintain a national control system, including a national control list.”

This list should “apply the provisions of the ATT to the broadest range of conventional arms.”

Article 12 adds to the record-keeping requirement, mandating that the list include “the quantity, value, model/type, authorized international transfers of conventional arms,” as well as the identity of the “end users” of these items.

In very clear terms, ratification of the ATT by the United States would require that the U.S. government force gun owners to add their names to the national registry. Citizens would be required to report the amount and type of all firearms and ammunition they possess.

Section 4 of Article 12 of the treaty requires that the list be kept for at least 10 years.
Finally, the agreement demands that national governments take “appropriate measures” to enforce the terms of the treaty, including civilian disarmament. If these countries can not get this done on their own, however, Article 16 provides for UN assistance, specifically including help with the enforcement of “stockpile management, disarmament, demobilization and reintegration programs.”

In fact, a “voluntary trust fund” will be established to assist those countries that need help from UN peacekeepers or other regional forces to disarm their citizens.

While obama has kept mostly mum lately on the ATT, especially in the face of such strident congressional opposition, the European Union has come right out and called for the enactment of the globalist gun grab.

On February 5, European Parliament voted to authorize the EU countries to ratify the ATT. In a less-than-enthusiastic press release, European Parliament declared that the ATT "wouldn't necessarily result in the reduction of arms production, but it should stop arms getting into the hands of terrorists and should stop arms flooding into areas that are unstable."

That sounds troubling. Given the proclivity of regimes to label political and religious dissenters as "radicals, extremists, separatists, terrorists", etc. and to nominate the United States as a battlefield in the global "war on terror," however, the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms of US citizens and residents, protected by the second amendment to the US constitution, is most certainly under attack in the form of this globalist gun grab.

Statements such as this are an admission against the interest of the perpetuation of the right to keep and bear arms, particularly in light of the obama’s co-signing of the U.S.-EU summit joint statement that specifically calls for gun control.

Perhaps obama, the self-professed former constitutional law professor, has forgotten the text of the second amendment to the US constitution, particularly the phrase “shall not infringe.”

It is clear that the UN exceeded its authority, for ownership and carry of personal weapons pertain to free choice of citizens and residents of a state as established by the God-given derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms of citizens and residents of a state, while ownership of tanks, military helicopters, military aircrafts, warships pertain to free choice of states as a part of national sovereignty of states. The UN clearly lacks authority to regulate personal weapons, seeking to unlawfully and groundlessly infringe upon national sovereignty of states and rights of citizens and residents of states. Therefore, the UN ATT exceeds UN mandate, which pertains solely to promotion of limitation of nuclear weapons, and decommissioning and destruction of chemical weapons of mass destruction and biological weapons of mass destruction, unless temporarily international sanctions on the individual basis with regard to a particular state or group of states with regard to non-personal conventional weapons as tanks, military helicopters, military aircrafts, warships are approved by the UN Security Council, making the UN arms trade treaty illegitimate and without legal effect, unlawfully and groundlessly exceeding legitimate UN authority, vested in the UN by the UN member-states.

Furthermore, the second amendment to the US constitution, that prohibits establishment of any infringements upon the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms of US citizens, supersedes and replaces the provisions of the UN ATT, making the UN ATT unconstitutional and without legal effect in the territory of the United States of America: when an international treaty, signed by the United States of America, including UN declarations, UN conventions, the UN charter, and the constitution of the United States of America conflict, the constitution of the United States of America is superior, superseding and replacing provisions of an international treaty, signed by the United States of America, and it is the duty of the US Congress not to ratify an international treaty, signed by the United States of America and contradicting the constitution of the United States of America, it is the duty of the federal, state and district governments not to implement an international treaty, signed by the United States of America and contradicting the constitution of the United States of America, it is the duty of US federal, state and district courts to declare an international treaty, signed by the United States of America and contradicting the constitution of the United States of America, unconstitutional

Not surprisingly, a majority of senators refuse to ratify the ATT. 50 senators are standing together to protect the right to keep and bear arms as guaranteed by the Second Amendment and have taken pen in hand to let obama know how they feel about his plan to rob their constituents of one of their most basic rights. In a letter addressed to obama, the senators enumerated six reasons the president should refuse to present the ATT to the Senate for ratification. Among the objections raised by senatorial signatories is the ambiguity of the treaty, as well as the grant to “foreign sources of authority” the power to “impose judgment or control on the U.S.” On the House side, a coalition of 180 members of Congress sent a letter to the president reaffirming their opposition to the implementation of the provisions of the ATT.

While it is not remarkable that obama supports the seizure of guns and ammunition from law-abiding Americans, the fact that only half of the U.S. Senate has come out in defense of the Second Amendment is noteworthy and should be remembered by citizens who understand that a disarmed population is a slave population, leading to oppression, dispossession, enslavement, desolation and genocide.

The obama administration signed the so-called the UN arms trade treaty (ATT) that violates the 2nd amendment to the US constitution and is therefore without legal effect within the territory of the United States. The US Senate shall not ratify the UN arms trade treaty and the next US republican president shall denounce the UN arms trade treaty that clearly violates the US constitution and US national sovereignty.

In fact, if the forthcoming congressional elections bring control over the US Congress to the US republican party, the US Congress shall draft, debate and pass motion of censure with regard to barrack hussein obama and his secretary of state, John Forbes Kerry, condemning their disregard and disrespectful attitude towards US civil rights, guaranteed by the second amendment to the US constitution, in signing the UN arms trade treaty, ordering the US federal government to abide by the second amendment to the US constitution and not to implement the UN arms trade treaty, and instructing the obama administration to denounce the UN arms trade treaty (ATT) within 45 days.

The ATT significantly exceeds UN authority, unlawfully and groundlessly interferes with the inalienable right to self-determination of peoples and national sovereignty as well as the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and keep and bear arms of citizens and residents of a state. Surprisingly, only Iran, Syria and North Korea properly and wisely voted against the ATT, while Russia, China, India, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Oman and nearly two dozen other states properly and wisely abstained. The arms trade treaty does not contribute positively to promotion and maintaining of peace between nations and individuals, but as the history of similarly worded agreements compellingly demonstrates paves the way to a civil war and genocide.

The preamble of the ATT acknowledges the United Nations as a source of principles upon which the agreement is based, unlawfully permitting the United Nations the power to authorize “end users” and “end use” of conventional arms. In fact, the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms, derivative from the natural right to liberty, comes from God and is given by God to a man. Specifically, Lord God Jehovah commanded a great sword to be given to the sheep (Book of Enoch, Section XVII, Chapter 90). Furthermore, Lord Jesus Christ commanded Christians to sell a garment and buy a sword (Luke 22:36). In fact the disciples of Lord Jesus Christ had two swords, the assault weapons of those days, the ownership of which was prohibited to non-citizens of the Roman empire (Luke 22:3. Thus, Lord Jesus Christ specifically ordered Christians to disregard human laws if such human laws contradict the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms. God through prophet Mohammed ordered each muslim to own a personal weapon and to carry out the holy war against those who do not acknowledge God, those who commit the abominable deeds of sexual perversions (homosexuality, lesbianism, bestiality, incest, pedophilia (sexual relations with girls below 12 years of age)), abominations (child murders (abortions), change of gender, cannibalism, human cloning), intentional murder, enslavement of men/women or selling of men/women to slavery, and those who engage in an aggressive war and genocide against islamic nations. Each muslim is expected to resist and wage the holy war against the Antichrist (Dajjal), his servants and slaves until the Day of Judgment.

Furthermore, the preamble of the ATT acknowledges the non-existent right of sovereign states to regulate and control conventional arms, when the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms, coming from God, and not from a people or a state, specifically prohibits a people or a state to limit or abridge the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms, instructing the worshipers of God to disregard any civil law limiting or abridging the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms. Additionally, the constitutions of sovereign states, specifically the US constitution, prohibit the state from limiting or abridging the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms. Finally, the traditions and customs of the nations of men, reflective of the commandments of God, acknowledged the customary right of citizens and free men to be armed. Hence, contrary to the false claim of the ATT there exists no right of a sovereign state to regulate and control personal weapons. Thus, the preamble of the ATT unlawfully interferes with the commandments of both Christian and islamic religion, and is therefore without legal effect as contrary to the clear commandments of Lord God Jehovah and Lord Jesus Christ, furthermore contradicting the commandments of islamic faith and sharia law, constitutions of sovereign nations, and customs and traditions of the nations of men.

The scope of the ATT unlawfully interferes with the inalienable right to self-determination of peoples and national sovereignty, since ownership of battle tanks, military aircrafts, military helicopters, warships is reserved to peoples, and ownership of light armored vehicles and stationary artillery systems is reserved to peoples and self-defense militias of citizens, being part of self-determining peoples, and these are exclusively self-determining peoples and the states such self-determining peoples establish that define the rules pertaining to trade in the above-mentioned arms. Furthermore, the scope of the ATT unlawfully interferes with the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and keep and bear arms of citizens and residents of the state, permitting to own military knives, handguns, automatic rifles, machine guns, grenades, portable grenade launchers, portable missile launchers, portable anti-aircraft missiles, portable anti-tank missiles, portable naval missiles, and appropriate munitions. And while some may consider the scope of the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and keep and bear arms extensive, there is a historical record of the last two centuries when tanks, helicopters and aircrafts were sent by the states against previously disarmed civilians to massacre hundreds of thousands or even millions of civilians. In contrast, in the nations wherein the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms is protected, and people are armed with the above-mentioned personal arms to be able to effectively protect themselves, there were no such massacres recorded. Therefore, the scope of the ATT unlawfully interferes with the inalienable right to self-determination of peoples, national sovereignty and the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms, and is without legal effect.

Article 5 of the ATT orders states to establish national control systems, including the national control list - that is, a database of those who owns, buys, sells, trades, or transfers any of the weapons included in the list provided above as well as the ammunition, parts, and components of those weapons, which, furthermore, should be provided to the secretariat of the United Nations to be made available to other states and to be kept at least 10 years. It is clearly obvious that article 5 of the ATT violates numerous constitutions of sovereign nations, specifically constitutes an unreasonable search prohibited under the fourth amendment to the US constitution, and violates the requirements of national defense, being part of the inalienable right to self-determination of peoples and national sovereignty. Additionally, as it is well known, gun registration is gun confiscation, and without gun registration gun confiscation is impossible to be achieved. Hence, article 5 of the ATT is contrary to the inalienable right to self-determination of peoples and national sovereignty as well as protection against unreasonable searches and seizures in numerous constitutions of sovereign nations, and is without legal effect.

Article 16 of the ATT specifically permits the UN to interfere in the internal affairs of sovereign nations, including help with the enforcement of stockpile management, disarmament, demobilization and reintegration programs, which may well be used as a cover for invasion of the territory of a sovereign nation the gun laws of which are not to the liking of the UN.

The arms trade treaty does not recognize the inherent right of a people against which genocide is committed to receive weapons to defend their life, liberty from enslavement, dignity from rape and physical assault and movable property if such a people wishes so, which is a well established principle of international law recognized by many nations, including Persian kings, and a part of the inalienable right to self-determination of peoples. It imposes an obligation to consider if the transfer of arms facilitates terrorism or transnational organized crime: hence, given that regimes that commit genocide ordinarily call their victims terrorists and criminals, the ATT unlawfully and groundlessly interferes with the right of a people against which genocide is committed to receive weapons to defend their life, liberty from enslavement, dignity from rape and physical assault and movable property, if such a people wishes so, being a part of the inalienable right to self-determination of peoples. Hence, the ATT does not contribute to promotion and maintenance of peace as its proponents claim, but in fact provokes a civil war, so it is proper and lawful for the manufacturers and owners of personal weapons not to comply with the provisions of the ATT provoking an unnecessary and avoidable conflict between a state and the citizens of a state who manufacture, own and transfer personal arms by requiring gun registration, which is in fact gun confiscation, and paves the way for genocide of unpopular minorities and popular majorities by oppressive governments by unlawfully, groundlessly and onerously burdening the transfer of personal weapons in such circumstances.

Therefore, the ATT unlawfully and groundlessly interferes with the inalienable right to self-determination of peoples and national sovereignty, as well as the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and keep and bear arms of citizens and residents of a state, and is therefore without legal effect as contrary to the clear commandments of Lord God Jehovah and Lord Jesus Christ, furthermore contradicting the commandments of islamic faith and sharia law, constitutions of sovereign nations, and customs and traditions of nations of men. The passage of the ATT is in itself a gross infringement of the United Nations upon the authority of sovereign states and individual rights, and the continuation of the downfall of the United Nations, which increasingly proves to be a failed globalist and humanist project, attempting to define and enforce the non-existent global standards in the world of nation states and regional international organizations with different religions, cultures, values, customs and traditions, and ultimately civilizations, that are often in conflict with each other to such a degree that few foundational principles can be successfully defined and enforced. Hence the world of the 21st century will ultimately be the world without the United Nations replaced by regional international organizations of the nations belonging to the same civilizations.

There is no question that the transfer of non-personal conventional weapons, specifically battle tanks, military aircrafts, military helicopters and warships to dictatorships contributes to international conflicts and brings significant damage to civilians. To this cause UN security council sanctions are available, and it is not the deficiency of the sanctions mechanism, but rather the unwillingness of some members of the UN security council to approve appropriate sanctions in clear cases of genocide and grave mass violations of human rights that hampers the effectiveness of UN sanctions against dictatorial regimes. This mechanism can further be strengthened by regional treaties approved by consensus of their participants, limiting the numbers of battle tanks, military aircrafts, military helicopters and warships to prevent arms race and establishing clear well-defined and properly interpreted criteria for the transfer of battle tanks, military aircrafts, military helicopters and warships to third nations to prevent their transfer to dictatorships. The treaty on conventional armed forces in Europe, prepared and ratified by the OSCE members, is a good example of such a treaty. Trade in personal weapons, however, shall not be regulated, given its essential importance for preservation of freedom and individual rights and prevention of genocide and grave mass violations of human rights. As for the UN, it shall concentrate on its original mandate wherein it has jurisdiction: limitation of nuclear weapons, and prohibition and destruction of chemical and biological weapons of mass destruction throughout the world, leaving conventional arms to jurisdiction of the regional organizations of states, peoples and individuals wherein it pertains.

Regrettably, a historical record is ripe with the terrible consequences of civilian disarmament and failure to provide personal weapons to unpopular minorities and populations of dictatorial regimes, against whom genocide is committed, containing a long list of hundreds of millions of victims. Even UN peacekeepers proved to be unable to prevent genocide and grave mass violations of human rights as it happened in former Jugoslavian and African nations. It is good and proper for the nations of the world to remember Carthage, which the Romans after the inspection of Carthage first asked to discontinue production of conventional weapons of that day, subsequently asked to give away the stocks of the most of conventional weapons and then came to massacre all Carthaginians and burned the city of Carthage to the ground, and to reject the arms trade treaty in its entirety, disregarding the siren voices of advocates of civilian disarmament, which seek to use the ATT as its Trojan horse.

Therefore, the US Senate shall not ratify the UN arms trade treaty. Furthermore, the US federal government, US state governments and district governments, citizens and residents of the United States of America shall not comply with the provisions of the UN arms trade treaty, bearing neither legal nor moral responsibility, since the UN arms trade treaty is without legal effect as contrary to the clear commandments of Lord God Jehovah and Lord Jesus Christ, furthermore contradicting the inalienable right to self-determination of the American people and US national sovereignty, the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and keep and bear arms of citizens and residents of the United States of America, the 2nd amendment to the US constitution, provisions of the constitutions of US states, and customs and traditions of the American people. The US federal government, US state and district governments as well as US federal, state, district and international courts shall not regard the arms trade treaty as customary international law. Those who support the arms trade treaty should understand that they as the Carthaginians of old are paving the way to civil war, foreign aggression, and genocide or enslavement of unpopular minorities or majorities by economic, social and ethnic elites, bringing with the ATT death and destruction instead of peace and security claimed.

Specifically, US federal, state and district courts shall not regard the UN arms trade treaty as customary international law and shall repeal any executive order of the US federal government based on the provisions of the UN arms trade treaty as contrary to the constitution of the United States. US states, districts and citizens shall not comply with the provisions of the UN arms trade treaty, shall not comply with the provisions of any executive order based on the provisions of the UN arms trade treaty as contrary to the constitution of the United States. Finally, US citizens should purchase at least one and still better two machine guns with 12,000 rounds of ammunition per each male member of their families, at least one and still better two handguns with 1,200 rounds of ammunition per each female member of their families, and two military knives per each family member.

Those men and women of good will who are sincerely interested in promotion of disarmament within the UN should concentrate first and foremost on limiting nuclear weapons, and prohibition and destruction of chemical and biological weapons of mass destruction throughout the world. Whereas US and Russian nuclear arsenals are reduced to reasonable numbers adequate for the purposes of national defense, it is important to concentrate on the nuclear states of China, the UK, France, India, Pakistan to meet their present commitment towards declaring and limiting their nuclear arsenals as well as to respect the right of the great regional powers of Turkey, Iran, Japan, Germany to develop and possess a limited number of nuclear weapons to secure their sovereignty if these nations wish so. It is important to encourage North Korea to reunite with South Korea, making the united Korea a nuclear state with a limited number of nuclear weapons, given many instances of foreign aggression against the Korean nation, or, if the united Korea wishes so, it can decommission its nuclear arsenal and become a non-nuclear state. It is also important to pass a UN resolution to call upon the state of Israel to declare its nuclear arsenal, subject it to international inspections and take the obligation to limit its nuclear arsenal, while acknowledging the state of Israel as a nuclear state. Finally, a treaty establishing a comprehensive global ban on chemical and biological weapons of mass destruction should be developed, ratified and implemented, given that these weapons are no longer effective in modern warfare, suitable mainly for the unlawful use against civilian population, and especially prone to acquisition and use by terrorists.

Importantly, what the nations of men need to promote and maintain peace is not civilian disarmament, but affirmation of the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms and the civil right to organize, train and arm self-defense militias of the people, to give citizens protection against crime and to establish volunteer or low-cost civil associations that proved numerous times their effectiveness in provision of territorial defense, fighting misdemeanor crime and illegal migration to be gradually integrated in the national guard in these times of rising crime, budget deficits, and inevitable reductions in military and police budgets, permitting gradual dissolution of standing armies and concentration of the police upon felony crimes. These civilian associations also proved to be a formidable obstacle to dictatorships of various sorts and infringements upon authority of provincial and district governments, rights of citizens and residents of the states as the rebellion of Italian carabineri against the fascist Mussolini regime so well demonstrated. In fact more personal weapons equals less crime, and many other positive good effects as US classical researcher John Lott so clearly demonstrated in his thorough study ‘More Guns, Less Crime’. Regrettably, the adoption of the ATT by the UN points to grave dangers ahead: global economic, social and ethnic elites have chosen a war and genocide, which they will get and in which they will not prevail, shedding rivers of blood in the process.

Some public officials of the obama administration are unhappy that Americans still have their weapons, and barrack hussein obama declared that he would put all his weight towards the introduction of so-called gun control laws in the United States of America, seeking to unlawfully interfere with the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and keep and bear arms, given by God. Interestingly, barrack hussein obama acknowledged that the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms was given by God, yet falsely stated that this right given by God somehow conflicted with other derivative-natural rights, in particular, the natural right to life. This is of course a blatant lie: guns do not kill people, but criminals do, and as American classical scholar Lott demonstrated, more guns leads to less crime.

A good example supporting these findings is the recent Fort Hood shooting, in TX: a latino murderer from Puerto Rico killed three US soldiers and wounded more than a dozen others, because US soldiers were reportedly left unarmed, unable to resist intruders. It is long overdue to authorize US soldiers and officers to be armed with personal weapons on military bases, which was the US military policy in the more sound times of the end of the 19th century. Importantly, a latino murderer was likely motivated by Puerto Rico independence movement that seeks to establish the separate state of Puerto Rico: therefore the US Congress shall consider whether it is proper and wise to recognize Puerto Rico as the 51st US state to counter the spread of Puerto Rico independence movement. Some of course claimed that the alleged psychological problems of the latino murderer caused the shooting, which is untrue: the alleged psychological problems were relatively mild and characteristic of tens of millions of Americans who do not shoot anyone, lawfully owning personal weapons. Therefore, while it is wise and proper to remove US citizenship from felons and criminally insane individuals who were institutionalized as a punishment for felony crimes, criminal in character, as murder, rape and physical assault, rather than political and economic conduct, unduly criminalized, there are no objective grounds to link mild psychological problems to mass shootings, in particular, since most of these psychological problems are caused by abuse of drugs, alcohol and tobacco, which, regretfully, many US citizens and residents abuse.

In fact, the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms is established precisely to defend the natural right to life of US citizens from criminals as well as from a tyrannical US federal government, or, more generally, established by Lord God Jehovah, Lord Jesus Christ, Holy Spirit to protect the life of righteous men from wicked men and wicked tyrannical governments. Regrettably, the history of men, in particular, that of the 20th century, is full of examples of democratic genocide, i.e., genocide of disarmed and often righteous men and women by totalitarian states and other tyrannies, often either elected by the majority of the people or approved by the majority of the people through active or tacit compliance with its genocidal policies. And the US government is no exception as the recent events in Waco, TX have demonstrated so well.

Regretfully, barack hussein obama demonstrated his contempt towards the American system and the American way once again, claiming that the 2nd Amendment is somehow obsolete, when in fact it is not at all obsolete. The derivative-natural rights, recognized and protected in the first ten amendments to the US constitution, were established so that any change the United States of America goes through did not destroy the citizens of the United States who disagree with such change, and were intended to be permanent and unchangeable unless changed by the American people through a constitutional amendment. Therefore, if barack hussein obama is unhappy with the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and keep and bear arms, he should seek to amend the constitution of the United States, in accordance with the procedure established in the constitution, and not to propose unconstitutional laws or executive orders.

The words of the 2nd amendment to the US constitution, recognizing the derivative natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms as a civil right are clear:

“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed”

The 2nd amendment applies to citizens of the United States, who keep and bear personal arms irrespective of purposes - that is, all arms and weapons that can be born by a man, including knives, handguns, semi-automatic and automatic weapons, machine guns, portable grenade launchers, portable rocket launchers, portable anti-aircraft missiles, portable anti-tank missiles, portable naval missiles, appropriate munitions and explosives, light military vehicles and war boats. The 2nd amendment to the US constitution does not apply to the advanced weapons that cannot be born by a man as tanks, military aircrafts and helicopters, warships: such weapons are owned collectively by the American people and belong to US armed forces and the national guard of US states. The 2nd amendment to the US constitution does not apply to chemical, biological and nuclear weapons of mass destruction: these weapons are owned solely by the US federal government.

With regard to restrictions, registration with the governments of US states can be required with regard to portable grenade launchers, portable rocket launchers, portable anti-aircraft missiles, portable anti-tank missiles, portable naval missiles, and certain high powered explosives. With regard to all other personal weapons, including automatic weapons and machine guns, no restrictions are constitutionally permissible, and any registration requirements are constitutionally prohibited. Similarly, the United States cannot prohibit convicted felons and criminally insane persons, who committed felonies, from keeping and bearing arms if it recognizes such persons as citizens of the United States. The United States can and should, however, withdraw citizenship rights from convicted felons and criminally insane persons, who committed felonies on US soil, in accordance with the judgments of US courts: such persons should lose their US citizenship rights if convicted of a felony in trial by jury, which has always been the US government policy in the past. Similarly, the US government can require gun manufacturers to provide to customers a firearm safety course as a part of purchase: the NRA administers many such firearm safety courses across the United States.
fdtwain is offline  
Old April 17th, 2016, 11:20 AM   #13
Banned
 
fdtwain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Europe
Posts: 618
A false statement was also made by an official from the US department of defense, who falsely claimed that US citizens did not need so-called assault weapons. The statement is obviously false: the United States cannot afford to keep a large army overseas, and keep a large standing army in peacetime, which was never intended by the founders of the United States. Objectively, the United States will have to evacuate all of its forces outside the United States back to the continental United States, transferring responsibility for their defense back to these nation states, and common defense agreement organizations of these states as NATO. There is absolutely no need for the US army to be stationed in Europe: European states are rich enough to take care of their national security. Similarly, Japan and South Korea are rich nations, which can take care of their national security, and Japan can develop nuclear weapons if it regards doing so as essential to preserve its sovereignty and independence. While NATO can and should be preserved and extended, by admitting as members all EU member-states willing to become its members as well as Australia and New Zealand, and the process of repatriation of the US army from overseas back to the US territory can be made gradual over seven years to give nation states time to take responsibility for their national security, the process is inevitable. The United States cannot and will not keep a standing army in peacetime: instead, the US navy with the marine corps of 200,000 marines, the US air force, the US strategic and tactical nuclear force, the US air defense system, adequately scaled back, will be preserved, and the US army disbanded, with the US national guard, commanded by US state governors, and consisting of weapon owning citizens taking its place. It is important to organize, train and arm two rapid response brigades of the US national guard in each US state, 10,000 US national guardsmen in each brigade, 20,000 US national guardsmen in each US state, to be able to be deployed in their respective US state within 24 hours. The US national defense budget will be scaled back from nearly 700 billion USD to no more than 200 billion USD annually to eliminate enormous US budget deficit. And US citizens will be permitted not only to own the so-called assault weapons, including machine guns, but also portable grenade launchers, portable rocket launchers, portable anti-aircraft missiles, portable anti-tank missiles, portable naval missiles, explosives and appropriate munitions as guardsmen of the US national guard. The so-called assault weapons are obviously needed for US citizens to defend the United States as well as to hunt a large wild beast as a bear to resist any infringements by the tyrannical US federal government upon the natural rights, derivative-natural rights, civil rights and traditional rights of US citizens and residents. The US military-industrial complex has to be scaled back, which is a painful, but a necessary and unavoidable process.

A strange motion to limit magazine capacity of weapons was proposed by those who do not understand that it takes as many as 20 rounds to stop an overweight robber, or a rapist, or a bear, not speaking of importance of high capacity magazines for the citizens defending their states from foreign aggression or usurpation of rights of citizens and states by the US federal government. For this reason, this strange suggestion by those who obviously cannot operate a firearm should be rejected. Another strange motion is to institute comprehensive background check for firearm buyers that can only harass law-abiding US citizens. What is in fact necessary is to institute a rule removing US citizenship from all convicted felons and criminally insane persons who committed a felony as well as to require proof of US citizenship as US passport or US birth certificate to purchase a firearm. Actually, the present gun show exception is properly worded and narrowly construed to promote responsible firearm ownership, since gun dealers and the US citizens who offer their guns at gun shows are generally responsible in choosing to whom they sell weapons.

The Papal office in Rome also spoke in favor of gun control, contrary to clear teaching of Lord God Jehovah, Lord Jesus Christ, Holy Spirit on the subject. In fact, Lord God Jehovah ordered a great sword to be given to the sheep, the worshipers of Lord God Jehovah and Lord Jesus Christ (Book of Enoch, Section XVII, Chapter 90), Lord Jesus Christ specifically commanded his followers who had no swords to sell garments and purchase swords/personal weapons (Luke 22:36). The apostles of Lord Jesus Christ had two swords, the assault weapons of that day, the possession of which was forbidden to non-Romans (Luke 22:3. This leaves aside the question of proper deference towards faithful American Christian churches. Yet the bishop of Rome left the sound doctrine, replacing the pure Word of God with human imaginations with regard to the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms.

Similarly, unrighteous jews living in the United States took an unhealthy position, attacking the NRA and seeking to unlawfully disarm Americans, which is completely unacceptable, given that the Word of God is clear on the subject: Lord God Jehovah gave a great sword to the sheep. Some unrighteous jews even demanded that the NRA should not interfere with their unlawful activities to disarm Americans. Yet the NRA and other patriotic Americans will continue to stand in the way of these unrighteous jews, who will either repent or perish, as Lord God Jehovah and Lord Jesus Christ will fight against them and for the NRA and other patriotic Americans. And the jews who are not happy living in a Christian republic, the United States of America, can of course in all times emigrate to the state of Israel to live under jewish law in a jewish state.

The reasons for this push to disarm US citizens are obvious. The US public debt is at present 17.5 trillion USD, of which 12.6 trillion USD is held by the public. The US maximum debt carrying capacity estimated as 10% of US federal revenues over the last seven years is 1.9 trillion USD, while the insolvency boundary, indicating impossibility of repayment of US government debt and rendering the US credit rating as D, is nine times the maximum US debt carrying capacity, 17.1 trillion USD. It is clearly obvious that the US cannot repay or service its debts in the long term, and once the insolvency boundary is crossed, the default on US government debt becomes inevitable.

The obama administration seeks to disarm and enslave US citizens, by assigning them tax and social security numbers, and imposing prohibitive taxes upon them, forcing them to work their own destruction, working more and more for lower and lower wages, unable to purchase a house, to create a family and to support and raise children, in order to pay interest on progressively growing US government debt burden, which cannot be repaid in principle, providing lavish life for economic, social and ethnic elites. Regrettably, the present state of technology is such that continuing such a policy will inevitably lead to implanting microchips into US citizens and creation of a technocratic dictatorship with a sad and tragic end described in the Book of Revelation of John.

The obama administration claims it can repay US government debt by simply printing the necessary amount of money, which is of course true to a point. Yet the consequences of such debt repayment are well known: triple digit inflation, destruction of hundreds of millions of the poor and middle class Americans, who will not be able to afford even food and clothing, and sale of the best US assets to foreigners, and rebellion as a result. Hence, it is not a realistic alternative, even though at some point the United States may have no other choice but to repay its debt in such a destructive way.

What should be done by patriotic Americans to resist the obama law? First, it is necessary to prepare to resist the democratic enforcers of the will of the totalitarian democratic US government. Every American family should purchase guns: at least one and better two machine guns and/or automatic weapons or semi-automatic weapons with at least 12,000 rounds of ammunition per every male member of the household, at least one and better two handguns with at least 1,200 rounds of ammunition per every female member of the household, and at least two military knives per each member of the household. Furthermore, every American should create 8-year food store to be ready to any disruptions of food supply. Every American family should also purchase a separate residence, and if it possesses sufficient funds, at least a hectare of land per each family member. Finally, every American family should sell the stocks of large corporations, presently overvalued at least 3 times through run away inflation - the consequence of FRS money printing - and put their savings beyond 3- to 6-month salary in cash, in 2/3 into gold and in 1/3 into silver, to preserve their savings from run away inflation, which is inevitable, given the scale of money printing in the US and throughout the world. It is lawful for a US citizen to wound and kill a US official, representative, statesman who tries to forcefully confiscate his weapons, bearing neither legal nor moral responsibility, since it is lawful to kill in defense of movable property (Exodus 22:2). In dealing with obama and his associates, the appropriate way is: resist the devil, and he will flee from you (James 4:7). Finally, it is important for US citizens who have appropriate funds at their disposal to establish a second residence in European states and to purchase property in Europe to be able to flee any federal persecution if such commences.

Some people strangely oppose to the US citizens taking responsible measures to protect their future and the future of their families, advising to focus on restoration of American liberty instead. Yet personal preparedness does not contradict taking collective actions to restore American liberty: in fact individual preparedness serves as a basis of taking collective actions to restore American liberty.

Subsequently, it is necessary to organize an effective lobbying effort against any attempts to ratify the UN arms trade treaty and to pass so-called gun control laws in the US Congress and the legislatures of US states. The NRA and the Republican party should use the ATT as an opportunity to educate US citizens about the fallacies of gun control and seek reversal of existing unlawful statutes restricting the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms in the US Congress, the congresses of US states, and in US courts. It is also important for the NRA to conduct a public relations campaign to illustrate how wide availability of guns and respect for the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms reduces crime in republican nations as Switzerland, makes a republican nation prepared to resist foreign aggression, and liberates nations as in the case of free Libya, unjustly defamed by some in the US Congress.

Furthermore, it is important for US citizens to disobey any executive orders of the US president unlawfully restraining the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms. US citizens should also disobey any state law requiring registration, confiscation or prohibition of firearms, since registration of firearms is unlawful under the 2nd amendment to the US constitution. US citizens should also continue the fight in the US court system against any unlawful laws passed by state legislatures. If any law restricting the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms is passed by the US Congress, any executive order restricting the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms is made by the president of the United States, or any judgment of the US supreme court restricting the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms is made, specifically mandating registration, confiscation or prohibition of firearms, US citizens should not comply with the above-mentioned provisions, and the governors and legislatures of the US states should nullify the above-mentioned provisions in the territories of their states by state law, stating the provisions of the 2nd and 10th amendments to the US constitution as basis for nullification. It is important to gradually discard the faulty reasoning that federal law is always superior to state law: in fact, state law, made subject to its reserved powers and the constitution of the United States, can and should be superior to federal law, if it does not exceed state power and is not contrary to the US constitution. Such state law in such circumstances is legitimate exercise of state authority to prevent federal usurpation of the rights reserved to the states or to the people.

Similarly, if a state law restricting the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms is passed by state legislature, specifically mandating registration, confiscation or prohibition of firearms, US citizens should not comply with the provisions of such a state law, and legislatures of state districts should nullify the above-mentioned provisions of a state law in the territories of their districts by district law, stating the provisions of the 2nd, 10th and 14th amendments to the US constitution as basis for nullification. In such a case, a district law, made subject to the reserved powers of the people and the constitution of the United States, can and should be superior to a state law, if it does not exceed district power, is made to protect the civil rights of the citizens of the United States and is not contrary to the US constitution. Such a district law in such circumstances is legitimate exercise of district authority to prevent state usurpation of the rights reserved to the people by the bill of rights.

Furthermore, if a particular district law or an act, restricting the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms, is passed in a district, specifically mandating registration, confiscation or prohibition of firearms, US citizens should not comply with the provisions of such a law or an act, state legislature should abolish the district law by the state law, preventing an unconstitutional district law from entering into legal force. Alternatively, such a law should be challenged in a state or federal court to prevent it from entering into legal force.

Finally, if an international treaty is signed by the US president restricting the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms, specifically mandating registration, confiscation or prohibition of firearms, such a treaty is invalid from its signing date, being contrary to the provisions of the US constitution, which are always superior to international treaties, the US senate should not ratify such a treaty, the US supreme court should strike down the provisions of such a treaty, US states should nullify such a treaty, and US citizens should not comply with the provisions of such a treaty.

What should discontented citizens who do not want to possess a firearm and want to live in a community without private firearms ownership do? First, they can collectively purchase land and establish gated communities on private land, where firearms ownership can be temporarily restricted through voluntary agreements between the community and land owners or tenants, provided there is a place in a district, wherein such a community is established, wherein the civil right guaranteed by the 2nd amendment to the US constitution is fully respected. Such a community can hire a private security firm or invite state law enforcement to provide law enforcement services to the community. Alternatively, discontented citizens can lobby for a constitutional amendment reflecting their political ideas, although, given popularity of firearms in the American society, such an amendment is unlikely to be passed. Thus, those Americans who do not want to live with firearms are free to do so, both individually and collectively, as well as to peacefully advocate their political views: they should not, however, conspire to interfere with the constitutional rights of other American citizens through unlawful executive, legislative, or court acts, or through unconstitutional international agreements.

Yet the threat of civilian disarmament in the United States under the obama administration is real. For this reason, important measures should be taken by patriotic US citizens to secure their constitutional rights.

Firstly, self-defense militias of the American people should be formed in all US states and districts. These militias should work independently or in association with the NRA and/or as a part of the US national guard to protect Christian faith and the Law of the Lord, customs and traditions of the American people, and the natural, derivative natural, civil and traditional rights of US citizens and residents as well as the rights and authority of US states and districts against federal usurpation or foreign aggression. The federal, state and district government should not harass activists of self-defense militias of the American people or try to disarm or dismantle self-defense militias of the American people. Self-defense militias of the American people should concentrate on identifying and reporting criminals and illegal immigrants in their communities, assisting the national guard of the borderline US states to protect the US border, and preparing and training to resist federal usurpation or foreign aggression. State governors should facilitate the activities of self-defense militias of the American people in their states by promoting law enforcement training and military training for militia members in association with members of the US national guard and the state police. The governors of US states should also develop contingency plans for the national guard of the US state to replace US army units for defense of their respective states, and should be ready to order the national guard of their respective states to resist any unconstitutional federal executive orders, laws or court decisions.

Secondly, judging Christian churches should be established in every US district and a judging church should establish a Christian religious court in every US district. A Christian religious court should judge all civil cases with the value of disputed property not exceeding the market value of 14,700 ounces of silver if both sides of the case agree to the judgment. Furthermore, a judging Christian church should register births, deaths and marriages and should justify Christians who kill in the following circumstances in accordance with the judgments of Lord God Jehovah, Lord Jesus Christ, Holy Spirit, bearing neither legal nor moral responsibility:

- it is lawful to take property, wound and kill those who commit the abominable deeds of sexual perversions (homosexuality (Leviticus 20:13), lesbianism (Leviticus 20:13), bestiality (Leviticus 20:15), incest (Leviticus 20:11-17), pedophilia (sexual relations with girls below 12 years of age) (Leviticus 20:2-3, Matthew 18:6)), abominations (child murders (abortions) (Leviticus 20:2-3, Exodus 21:22-25), change of gender (Book of Enoch Section XVII, Chapter 86, Section II, Chapter 10), cannibalism (Book of Enoch, Section II, Chapter 7,10), human cloning (Book of Enoch Section XVII, Chapter 86, Section II, Chapter 10)), intentional murder (Exodus 21:14), enslavement of men/women (Exodus 21:16) or selling of men/women to slavery (Exodus 21:16);
- it is lawful to wound and kill in defense of life (Exodus 21:14), liberty (Exodus 21:16), movable property, land up 100 hectares per man/family and real estate upon such land (Exodus 22:2), dignity from rape, which in its nature is enslavement (Exodus 21:16) and physical assault, which in its nature is attempted murder (Exodus 21:14);
-it is lawful for a US citizen to warn a foreign citizen, or a non-citizen, not born in the territory of the USA, to leave the territory of the USA, and if such a foreign citizen or a non-citizen does not leave on his or her own, subsequently forcefully repatriate such a foreign citizen or a non-citizen (Exodus 23:4). If such a foreign citizen resists repatriation, it is lawful to take property, wound and kill such a foreign citizen or a non-citizen, for such came to steal, kill and destroy (John 10:1,10; Exodus 21:14; Exodus 22:2);
- it is lawful for a US citizen to warn a foreign armed soldier to leave the territory of the USA, and if such an armed foreign soldier does not leave on his own, it is lawful to take property, wound and kill such a foreign armed soldier, he is an enslaver (Exodus 21:16);
- it is lawful for US citizen(s) to take property, wound and kill soldiers of aggressive foreign nations and their armed collaborators in a war against foreign aggression until just peace is established, those who initiated an aggressive war punished, and the territorial integrity of the states against which an aggressive war was waged is restored (Exodus 17:14,16, I Samuel 15:3);
- it is lawful to wound and kill a government official who takes children from parents for the cause other than infliction of a physical disability or engaging a child into prostitution or production of pornography - he is an enslaver (Exodus 21:16);
- it is lawful to wound and kill those who forcefully impose electronic numbers for taxpayers and social security identification, forcefully impose any marks, numbers, writings, microchips upon human skin or inside human body for any reason, forcefully collect and store biometric information as fingerprints, eye scan, DNA-samples, without a written court order supported by clear and compelling evidence, sufficient to accuse of felony a person from whom biometric evidence is collected - such are enslavers (Exodus 21:16);
- it is lawful to wound and kill a man-god and his followers who force men to worship him as god and forcefully impose any marks, numbers, writings, microchips upon human skin or inside human body for any reason (Revelation 19:20-21);
- it is lawful to wound and kill a government official, who arrests, imprisons, condemns to forced labor, condemns to forced medical treatment, wounds or kills in retaliation of exercise of the derivative-natural rights to absolute freedom of speech, freedom of peaceful assembly and association, freedom of Christian religion, derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and keep and bear arms - such is an enslaver (Exodus 21:16);
- it is lawful for a husband or a wife who has committed no adultery to wound and kill a wife or husband who has committed adultery (Leviticus 20:10).

A judging Christian church shall absolve the US citizens and residents who kill in aforementioned circumstances of any legal or moral responsibility for their just deeds by an act of remission of sins. Furthermore, a judging Christian church shall begin to compile the lists of US citizens and residents residing in a district who committed the abominable deeds of sexual perversions (homosexuality, lesbianism, bestiality, incest, pedophilia (sexual relations with girls below 12 years of age)), abominations (child murders (abortions), change of gender, cannibalism, human cloning), intentional murder, enslavement of men/women or selling of men/women to slavery, and to put such lists to the internet for faithful Christians to avoid dealing with the doers of the abominable deeds.

Christian churches in US districts should promote home schooling for European (White) and Christian children, by establishing websites with home schooling resources in association with HSLDA and should establish at least one Christian non-government liberal art academy providing classical education, a Christian non-government trade academy teaching business trades and professions, and a Christian non-government technical college teaching technical sciences in each US district. These educational institutions should award their own qualifications, not certified by the state or certification agencies, and should specifically require its staff and students to be Christians.

Christian churches in US districts should establish at least one Christian charitable medical clinic in each US district, providing preventative medical care and basic medical care to patients on the basis of ability to pay and independent of US insurance schemes. This medical clinic should specifically require its staff and students to be Christians.

Christian churches in US districts and states should establish citizens’ district and state councils, by electing two competent and moral representatives from each Christian church into the district council for the term of one year, and two competent and moral representatives from each district council into a state council for the term of two years. Each district and state council in association with appropriate non-government organizations should monitor and report legal acts of the US government infringing upon the natural rights, derivative-natural rights, civil rights, traditional rights of the citizens and residents of the United States, the rights and authority of the US districts and states.

Specifically, citizens’ district and state councils should focus on:

- lobbying the state governments to issue gold and silver coins and bullion and passing legal tender laws authorizing gold and silver coins and bullion as legal tender in the territory of each state, valued at current market price expressed in US dollars;
- lobbying US state governments and the US federal government to repatriate all illegal immigrants from the territory of the United States and construct an appropriate fence on the US-Mexico border to eliminate long-term unemployment in the United States largely caused by mass illegal immigration;
- lobbying the US federal government to dissolve the NAFTA trade agreement and to focus on admitting Canadian provinces to the United States of America as new US states;
- repealing all existing legal statutes, infringing upon the derivative-natural rights to absolute freedom of speech, freedom of peaceful assembly and association, freedom of Christian religion, the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and keep and bear arms, other civil rights of US citizens, districts and states guaranteed by the Bill of Rights. In particular, repealing together with the national rifle association and the US republican party all restrictions on ownership and carrying of automatic rifles and machine guns produced after 1986, by US citizens;
- prohibiting by state and federal law and preferably by constitutional amendments to the state and the US constitution, forceful imposition of electronic numbers for taxpayers and social security identification, forceful imposition of any marks, numbers, writings, microchips upon human skin or inside human body for any reason, forceful collection and storage of biometric information as fingerprints, eye scan, DNA-samples, without a written court order supported by clear and compelling evidence sufficient to accuse of felony a person from whom biometric evidence is collected;
- establishing a death penalty in all cases in US federal and state law as punishment of the doers of the abominable deeds of sexual perversions (homosexuality, lesbianism, bestiality, incest, pedophilia (sexual relations with girls below 12 years of age)), abominations (child murders (abortions), change of gender, cannibalism, human cloning), intentional murder, enslavement of men/women or selling of men/women to slavery, and absolving by US federal and state law from legal responsibility those who take property, wound and kill the doers of the abominable deeds of sexual perversions (homosexuality, lesbianism, bestiality, incest, pedophilia (sexual relations with girls below 12 years of age)), abominations (child murders (abortions), change of gender, cannibalism, human cloning), intentional murder, enslavement of men/women or selling of men/women to slavery;
- lobbying the US federal government to strengthen NATO and to admit Australia and New Zealand as NATO members if these nations wish so;
- establishing US foreign policy on the basis of US exceptionalism, making the US neither an imperial nation, nor a part of the global government, but a first-class regional great power preserving its exclusive interests in Latin America and NATO military alliance, and building relations with all other nations on the basis of bilateral mutually beneficial peaceful cooperation, promoting regional economic integration rather than global government or global governance schemes;
- promotion of restoration of the United States of America to its European (White), Christian and republican roots, and peaceful repatriation of the US citizens and residents of non-White ethnicity back to their respective nations or third nations, wherein those US citizens and residents can play a positive role in promoting political rights and freedoms and economic development;
- cooperating with the US Republican party to nominate competent and moral candidates to all district, state and federal government positions throughout the United States to provide economically and politically sound policy alternatives to the American people, consistent with Christian faith and the Law of the Lord, customs and traditions of the American people, natural rights, derivative-natural rights, civil rights and traditional rights of US citizens and residents;
- cooperating with the US Republican party to propose to US Congress a realistic debt restructuring and debt repayment plan as well as appropriate reduction in US federal spending;
- cooperating with the US Republican party to propose to US Congress a realistic taxation reduction plan to gradually reduce federal taxes to 10% income tax, 10% social tax, and 10% customs tariff with the exclusion of all other taxes as US national debt is progressively paid;
- cooperating with the US Republican party to reduce the scope of the US federal government and gradually restore to the states, districts and the American people the rights reserved to them by the 10th amendment to the US constitution;
- promotion of establishment of small and medium-sized American businesses hiring American citizens and producing goods on US soil in association with appropriate non-government organizations and financial institutions.

Every American family should purchase guns: at least one and better two machine guns and/or automatic weapons or semi-automatic weapons with at least 12,000 rounds of ammunition per every male member of the household, at least one and better two handguns with at least 1,200 rounds of ammunition per every female member of household, and at least two military knives per each member of the household. US citizens shall not register their firearms and ammunition: guns registration is gun confiscation.

How should an American citizen react to any gun confiscation scheme, either state or federal? An American citizen should at least shut himself in his house and prepare to shoot any enforcers of an unconstitutional gun confiscation scheme, justly killing in defense of his property: the blood of such enforcers is upon them. An American citizen should fight such enforcers to the last men, woman and child of his family, and should remember what judeo-bolsheviks did to Russians, who foolishly permitted themselves to be disarmed, arresting and torturing them. Thus it is better to die free, fighting in dignity than to be tortured by such enforcers who routinely permit their inmates to be raped by negroes and other non-Whites, loosing dignity, for the worst federal enforcers can do to dead bodies is to violate them as US soldiers regularly do to dead Taliban freedom fighters and other dead enemies. Those American citizens who are able should join self-defense militias of the American people, hunt and shoot down such enforcers of an unconstitutional gun confiscation scheme, and furthermore be prepared to hunt and shoot down all doers of the abominable deeds of sexual perversions (homosexuality, lesbianism, bestiality, incest, pedophilia (sexual relations with girls below 12 years of age)), abominations (child murders (abortions), change of gender, cannibalism, human cloning), intentional murder, enslavement of men/women or selling of men/women to slavery in their districts and states, eradicating filth from US soil, who bring degeneration and trouble, and should repatriate the jews and non-Whites from the United States of America to their nations or third countries. District and state councils should coordinate the activities of self-defense militias of the American people in resistance to gun confiscation schemes, together with patriotic district and state governments and the US national guard, until US soil is liberated and a gun confiscation scheme repealed. Subsequently, the US federal government should be restructured, reelected and reappointed, all unconstitutional legislation repealed and American liberty restored.

Thus, US nationalists, patriots, republicans, conservatives, fundamentalists and European (White) men and women will successfully resist any gun registration, prohibition, or confiscation scheme proposed by the obama administration and coalition of zionists, masons, democrats, communists, socialists and coloreds that support it. And US nationalists, patriots, republicans, conservatives, fundamentalists and European (White) men and women will defend American liberty with firearms till death, keeping their firearms in defiance of the UN arms trade treaty and any obama gun-control law in their cold dead hand if necessary.
fdtwain is offline  
Old April 17th, 2016, 11:21 AM   #14
Banned
 
fdtwain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Europe
Posts: 618
The foreign policy of freedom

The issue of the proper foreign policy for the United States of America has been debated for a long time. It is clear that the United States of America is not an empire, but a nation state that should concentrate on its national interests.

The new world will not be a UN dominated global world, or a world dominated by any superpower: in fact there will be no more superpowers, but two first class great powers, the United States of America and China. The new world is the world of nation states and voluntary regional integration organizations, and UN powers shall be significantly limited to its original mandate of prohibiting production and storage of chemical and biological weapons of mass destruction, promotion of limitation with regard to nuclear weapons, and authorizing peacekeeping operations in situations wherein aggressive war or genocide is taking place. Other international organizations, presently a part of the UN, will have to be separated from the UN and establish themselves as separate international organizations.

First, the NAFTA agreement will have to be restructured by removing Mexico from NAFTA, and limiting NAFTA to the US and Canada. It is important for the US republican party to prepare for authorization of Keystone pipeline, the construction of which is long overdue once the US republican president is elected in 2016.

Second, the Monroe doctrine shall be restored as the cornerstone of US foreign policy towards Latin American nations.

Third, the United States of America should gradually establish free-trade agreements with Australia and New Zealand and shall promote Australia and New Zealand NATO membership, if Australia and New Zealand desire this.

Fourth, the United States of America should support Great Britain, if Great Britain decides to withdraw from the EU, and should not oppose peaceful reunification of Ireland and Northern Ireland.

Fifth, the United States of America should withdraw its military forces from the territory of the EU member-states and return its military bases in the EU member-states to the EU member-states by the year 2020. Instead, Eastern European allies shall be encouraged to construct military airports to receive US national guardsmen to be deployed to their territory within 48 hours, if such a need arises. It is important to station the adequate US air force in the Eastern European nations that are the EU member-states, and to deploy missile defense system in the territory of Eastern European allies that are the EU member-states. Furthermore, the EU member-states that are NATO members should be encouraged to strengthen their national armies and to create the Eurocorps of 100,000 soldiers within NATO to defend the territory of the EU member-states from the Russian federation. Furthermore, it is important to gradually continue negotiations on the EU-US free trade agreement, not unduly streamlining these negotiations, but rather adequately protecting the economic interests of US agriculture and industry during these negotiations. Finally, the United States of America should permit Germany to develop nuclear weapons, if Germany desires this.

The United States of America needs to permanently station one US fleet in Italy.

Sixth, it is important to understand that the Russian federation is the last colonial empire of Europe that consists of:

- metropoly – the lands of the Russian people and indigenous peoples within the Russian people (the Pomorian people, Uralian people, Siberian people, Cossack people, Komi-Permian people, Yakutian people, Mari people, Mordovian people, Udmurtian people, Chuvashian people, Khakasian people, Altaian people), who seek the establishment of the Russian nation state, within which the Pomorian people, Uralian people, Siberian people, Cossack people realize their sacred and inalienable right to self-determination of peoples through creation of autonomous and self-governing provinces in accordance with the federative treaties on distribution of powers between the Russian nation state and autonomous and self-governing provinces, having the status of amendments to the constitution of the Russian nation state, the Komi-Permian people, Yakutian people, Mari people, Mordovian people, Udmurtian people, Chuvashian people, Khakasian people, Altaian people realize their sacred and inalienable right to self-determination of peoples through creation of autonomous and self-governing regions in accordance with the federative treaties on distribution of powers between the Russian nation state and autonomous and self-governing provinces, having the status of amendments to the constitution of the Russian nation state;
-colonies – the lands of the enslaved muslim and Tatar-Mongolian peoples of Russia - Chechnya, Ingushetia, Dagestan, Kabardino-Balkaria, Karachay-Cherkessia, Adygea (with the part of Krasnodar region till the border of Karachay-Cherkessia), Tatarstan, Bashkortostan (with the part of Orenburg region till the border of Kazakhstan), Kalmykia, Tuva, Buriatia, Northern Ossetia, who seek freedom, sovereignty and independence and who shall be given freedom, sovereignty and independence in accordance with the sacred and inalienable right to self-determination of peoples through holding referendums among the citizens of the Russian federation, belonging to the above-mentioned peoples, whenever possible;
- historically non-Russian lands occupied by the Russian federation, that seek reunification with the nations from which they were forcefully taken and that shall be returned to the nations that are lawful owners: the Kurili islands belonging to Japan, Karelia and the territories of the Russian federation that were a part of Finland, in accordance with the treaty of Tartu of 1920 belonging to Finland, the territories of the Russian federation that were a part of Estonia, in accordance with the treaty of Tartu of 1920 belonging to Estonia, the territories of the Russian federation that were a part of Lithuania and Latvia, in accordance with the treaty of Riga of 1921 belonging to Lithuania and Latvia, Kaliningrad region, in the territory of which there shall be established the free, sovereign and independent great duchy of Koenigsberg under the scepter of George Romanov-Hohenzollern of the House of Romanov.

Furthermore, presently the Russian federation is ruled by the putin dictatorship that makes it even more aggressive, oppressive, anti-western and anti-Christian, given the background of putin, the former kbg colonel.

As a colonial empire ruled by an oppressive dictatorship, the Russian federation naturally threatens its neighbors, seeking re-establishment of the neo-ussr, the eurasian union. Hence, the Russian federation is the main geopolitical enemy of the United States of America and NATO as long as it exists, and those who think otherwise delude themselves.

Can the Russian federation cease to become an enemy of the United States of America and NATO? Yet, if it becomes the nation state of the Russian people and indigenous peoples within the Russian people, once:

- the territory of the Russian federation without the lands of the enslaved muslim and Tatar-Mongolian peoples of Russia (Chechnya, Ingushetia, Dagestan, Kabardino-Balkaria, Karachay-Cherkessia, Adygea (with the part of Krasnodar region till the border of Karachay-Cherkessia), Tatarstan, Bashkortostan (with the part of Orenburg region till the border of Kazakhstan), Kalmykia, Tuva, Buriatia, Northern Ossetia) and historically non-Russian lands occupied by the Russian federation, that seek reunification with the nations from which they were forcefully taken and that shall be returned to the nations that are lawful owners (the Kurili islands belonging to Japan, Karelia and the territories of the Russian federation that were a part of Finland, in accordance with the treaty of Tartu of 1920 belonging to Finland, the territories of the Russian federation that were a part of Estonia, in accordance with the treaty of Tartu of 1920 belonging to Estonia, the territories of the Russian federation that were a part of Lithuania and Latvia, in accordance with the treaty of Riga of 1921 belonging to Lithuania and Latvia, Kaliningrad region, in the territory of which there shall be established the free, sovereign and independent great duchy of Koennigsberg under the scepter of George Romanov-Hohenzollern of the House of Romanov) will be given to Russian nationalists and the Russian people for establishment of the Russian nation state – the Russian republic (Rus) - and subsequently the ideal Russian state – the Russian kingdom - in the form of constitutional monarchy;
- the lands of the enslaved muslim and Tatar-Mongolian peoples of Russia - Chechnya, Ingushetia, Dagestan, Kabardino-Balkaria, Karachay-Cherkessia, Adygea (with the part of Krasnodar region till the border of Karachay-Cherkessia), Tatarstan, Bashkortostan (with the part of Orenburg region till the border of Kazakhstan), Kalmykia, Tuva, Buriatia, Northern Ossetia will be given unto these nations for establishment of free, sovereign and independent states;
- historically non-Russian lands occupied by the Russian federation, that seek reunification with the nations from which they were forcefully taken – the Kurili islands belonging to Japan, Karelia and the territories of the Russian federation that were a part of Finland, in accordance with the treaty of Tartu of 1920 belonging to Finland, the territories of the Russian federation that were a part of Estonia, in accordance with the treaty of Tartu of 1920 belonging to Estonia, the territories of the Russian federation that were a part of Lithuania and Latvia, in accordance with the treaty of Riga of 1921 belonging to Lithuania and Latvia - will be returned to the nations that are lawful owners of these historically non-Russian lands. In the territory of Kaliningrad region there will be established the free, sovereign and independent great duchy of Koenigsberg under the scepter of George Romanov-Hohenzollern of the House of Romanov.

Importantly, transition from the colonial empire to the nation state does not entail significant losses of either land or population for the Russian federation, and the Russian nation state will be adequately compensated for the lost territories with 1/3 of Arctic.

Yet the logic of any empire is simple: either an empire extends its dominion, or it decays, however all empires without exception are as bubbles that first blow up oppressing, dispossessing and enslaving subject peoples, and subsequently break up with much bloodshed and loss of wealth, releasing subject peoples to freedom: there were, there are and there will be no exceptions to this rule. Therefore, the Russian federation will inevitably fall and dissolve before the year 2017, remaining the main geopolitical threat to the United States of America, NATO, and the neighboring states in the interim.

The aggressive policies of the Russian federation necessitate containment:

1. In the North:

- by admitting Finland and Sweden to NATO if Finland and Sweden desire to join NATO;
- by acknowledging as legitimate the demands of the Karelian people to secede from the Russian federation and establish their free, separate and independent Karelian state, the republic of Karelia, if the Karelian people desire to do this;
- by dividing Arctic, giving 1/3 to the EU and EFTA, 1/3 to the Russian federation, and 1/3 to the United States of America and Canada.

2. In the West:

- by acknowledging de-jure independence of Transnistria, thereby permitting Moldova without Transnistria either to re-unify with the brotherly Romanian state, from which it was separated by the unjust Molotov-Ribbentrop pact, or to become a member of the EU on its own, if Moldova without Transnistria desires to do this, developing a bilateral cooperation program between NATO and Moldova without Transnistria;
- by gradual establishment of the Ukraine-EU free trade zone and gradual admission of Ukraine into EFTA over the next 7-10 years, by developing a bilateral cooperation program between NATO and Ukraine, with regard to Ukrainian territory without the territory of the republic of Crimea, inclusive of the city of Sevastopol, that seceded from Ukraine, and without the Donetsk and Lugansk regions of Ukraine, ancestral lands of the Russian ethnic minority of Ukraine, populated by more than 2/3 Ukrainian citizens of the Russian ethnic minority background, that have the sacred and inalienable right to self-determination of peoples, while acknowledging political and military neutrality of Ukraine and non-participation of Ukraine in the EU and NATO by the appropriate resolution of the United Nations Organization;
- by acknowledging as legitimate the demands of the German ethnic minority residing in the Kalinigrad region of the Russian federation to secede from the Russian federation and establish their free, separate and independent Koenigsberg state, the great duchy of Koenigsberg, under the scepter of George Romanov-Hohenzollern of the House of Romanov, if the German ethnic minority residing in the Kalinigrad region of the Russian federation desires to do so.

3. In the East:

- by acknowledging as legitimate the territorial demands of Japan for return of the Kurili islands by the Russian federation to Japan;
- by acknowledging as legitimate the demands of the Kalmyk, Buriat and Tuvian peoples to secede from the Russian federation and establish their free, separate and independent states, the republics of Kalmykia, Tuva, Buriatia, if the Kalmyk, Buriat and Tuvian peoples desire to do so.

4. In the South:

- by inviting the free, sovereign and independent states of Kazakhstan, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan, Turkmenistan, Azerbaijan, the sphere of influence of Turkey, Iran and Pakistan, and calling upon Kazakhstan, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan, Turkmenistan, Azerbaijan to become the member-states of the Economic cooperation organization, returning to the islamic world, rather than being drawn into the integration schemes of the Russian federation, the eurasian union and the collective security treaty organization;
- by acknowledging as legitimate the demands of the Chechenian, Ingush, Ossetian, Dagetsani, Kabardino-Balkarian, Karachay, Cherkessian, Tatar, Bashkir, Adygean peoples to secede from the Russian federation and establish their free, separate and independent states, the islamic emirates of Chechnya, Ingushetia, Dagestan, Kabardino-Balkaria, Karachay-Cherkessia, Adygea (with the part of Krasnodar region till the border of Karachay-Cherkessia), the islamic republics of Tatarstan, Bashkortostan (with the part of Orenburg region till the border of Kazakhstan), the republic of Ossetia, consisting of Northern Ossetia and Southern Ossetia, if the Chechenian, Ingush, Ossetian, Dagetsani, Kabardino-Balkarian, Karachay, Cherkessian, Tatar, Bashkir, Adygean peoples desire to do this;
- developing bilateral cooperation programs between NATO and Georgia (without Abkhazia and Southern Ossetia) and the EU and Georgia (without Abkhazia and Southern Ossetia).

In evaluating the demands of the Russian federation for its sphere of influence, it is important to distinguish between imperial aspirations of the Russian federation for non-enlargement of the EU and NATO into Central and Eastern European countries, the member-states of the EU and NATO, that must be rejected, and legitimate concerns of the Russian federation for the Russian sphere of influence – the territory of Belarus, Ukraine without Western Ukraine (Rivno region, Lvov region, Ivano-Frankovsk region, Volyn region, Ternopol region, Carpathian region of Ukraine), Transnistria, Serbia (inclusive of the Serbian republic of Bosnia-Herzegovina and Serbian Northern Kosovo), Montenegro and Macedonia, that should be respected. In the Russian sphere of influence:

- political and military neutrality and non-participation in the EU and NATO of Belarus, Ukraine without Western Ukraine (Rivno region, Lvov region, Ivano-Frankovsk region, Volyn region, Ternopol region, Carpathian region of Ukraine), Transnistria, Serbia (inclusive of the Serbian republic of Bosnia-Herzegovina and Serbian Northern Kosovo), Montenegro and Macedonia have to be guaranteed by appropriate UN resolutions and the process of EU and NATO accession of Serbia, Montenegro and Macedonia discontinued;
- de-facto and de-jure independence of Transnistria shall be recognized, and friendly separation of Moldova and Transnistria carried out;
- secession of the Serbian republic of Bosnia-Herzegovina from Bosnia-Herzegovina, establishment of the islamic Bosnian state and the Serbian state, the republic of Herzegovina, and reunification of the republic of Herzegovina with Serbia, if approved in a free, direct and secret vote by 2/3 of Serbs residing in the Serbian republic of Bosnia-Herzegovina in a referendum, shall not be resisted and shall be acknowledged as legitimate;
- secession of the four Serbian municipalities of Kosovo, Serbian Northern Kosovo, from Kosovo, and reunification of Serbian Northern Kosovo with Serbia, if approved in a free, direct and secret vote by 2/3 of Serbs residing in the Serbian Northern Kosovo in a referendum, shall not be resisted and shall be acknowledged as legitimate.

Furthermore, all military, defense, anti-terrorist, security and police cooperation between the United States of America and the Russian federation and Belarus as well as the EU and NATO member-states and the Russian federation and Belarus shall be terminated: such cooperation weakens national defense of the United States of America, the EU and NATO member-states, and assists grave mass violations of fundamental human rights of the citizens of the Russian federation and Belarus by the Russian dictatorship and the Belarusian dictatorship.

Seventh, with regard to Japan, the United States of America should withdraw its military forces from Japan and return its military bases in Japan to Japan by the year 2020. It is important to station the adequate US air force in Japan and to deploy missile defense system in Japan. The United States of America should encourage Japan to create the national army of at least one million soldiers, and to develop nuclear weapons, if Japan desires this. The United States of America shall acknowledge as legitimate the territorial demands of Japan for return of the Kurili islands by the Russian federation to Japan.

The United States of America should withdraw its military forces from South Korea by the year 2020, while being ready to deploy the US air force to protect the territory of South Korea within 24 hours if the need arises. Peaceful negotiations should be encouraged between South Korea and North Korea with regard to gradual reunification of Korea, if South Korea desires to do so, and united Korea should be permitted to keep nuclear weapons, if united Korea desires this.

The United States of America needs to permanently station one US fleet in Japan.

Furthermore, it is important to gradually continue negotiations on the US free trade agreement with Asian allies, not unduly streamlining these negotiations, but rather adequately protecting the economic interests of US agriculture and industry during these negotiations.

Eighth, with regard to China it is important to promote peaceful negotiations with regard to reunification of China and Taiwan according to the principle of “one country - two systems” with the transition period of 100 years, permitting Taiwan to keep its military forces as the national guard of Taiwan. Furthermore, all military, defense, anti-terrorist, security and police cooperation between the United States of America and China, the NATO member-states and China shall be terminated, as such cooperation weakens national defense of the United States of America, the EU and NATO member-states.

Ninth, with regard to India, it is important to promote mutually beneficial US-Indian trade between the USA and the largest democratic nation of the world, India. The United States of America should also acknowledge India as an official nuclear power and support aspirations of India to become the sixth permanent member of the UN security council.

Tenth, with regard to islamic world:

1. With regard to Turkey, it is important for the United States of America to support termination of Turkey membership bid for accession to the EU, to allow Turkey to develop nuclear weapons, if Turkey desires this.

Furthermore, it is important to acknowledge as the Turkish sphere of influence the following countries: Albania, Kosovo (without Northern Kosovo), Bosnia (without the Serbian republic of Bosnia-Herzegovina), Cyprus (including Northern Cyprus), Turkmenistan, Azerbaijan (jointly with Iran) and Kazakhstan.

2. With regard to Pakistan, it is important for the United States of America to acknowledge as the Pakistani sphere of influence Afghanistan (jointly with Iran), Tajikistan (jointly with Iran) and Uzbekistan (jointly with Iran).

3. With regard to Iran it is important for the United States of America to allow Iran to develop nuclear weapons if Iran wishes so, and the Iranian right to peaceful exploration of nuclear energy cannot be questioned. Nevertheless, Iran-IAEA negotiations should continue to gradually address all concerns with regard to peaceful nature of the Iranian nuclear program in negotiated settlement, acceptable to both Iran and IAEA.

It is important for the United States of America to acknowledge as the Iranian sphere of influence Azerbaijan (jointly with Turkey), Afghanistan (jointly with Pakistan), Tajikistan (jointly with Pakistan), Uzbekistan (jointly with Pakistan), Kyrgyzstan and the part of Iraq till the Euphrates.

It is important for the United States of America to request withdrawal of Iranian military forces from Syria.

The United States of America and NATO shall withdraw all military forces from Afghanistan till the end of 2014, and should not oppose restoration of the legitimate government of Afghanistan – Taliban liberation movement.

Eleventh, with regard to the Middle East:

1. It is important for the United States of America to support Syrian freedom fighters in their struggle against the bloody and blasphemous assad regime:

- to supply Syrian freedom fighters with at least 10,000 tons of personal weapons and appropriate munitions monthly;
- to streamline the flow of food, clothing and medicine into Syria to assist internally displaced persons and Syrian civilians;
- to streamline the flow of food, clothing and medicine to Syrian refugees outside Syria.

The United States of America shall continue to destroy all Syrian chemical weapons of mass destruction, until all Syrian chemical weapons of mass destruction are destroyed by the end of 2014.

2. It is important for the United States of America to suspend all military aid to the military government of Egypt, to acknowledge the godly learned president of Egypt Mohammed Morsi as the legitimate president of Egypt until the expiry of his term at the end of 2016, to call for the end of persecution of the Muslim Brotherhood of Egypt, Al-Nour, gamaa islamia, and islamic jihad by the military government of Egypt and for release of all Egyptian citizens arrested and detained in retaliation for their exercise of the derivative-natural rights to absolute freedom of speech, freedom of peaceful assembly and association, freedom of Christian religion, freedom of conscience.

3. It is important for the United States of America to withdraw all military forces from Saudi Arabia and other Middle Eastern monarchies and to return its military bases in Middle Eastern monarchies to Middle Eastern monarchies by the year 2020.

4. The United States of America shall withdraw all military forces from Yemen by the end of 2014 and should call for peaceful negations between all political and religious factions of the Yemeni government, including Ansar-Al-Sharia liberation movement.

5. It is important for the United States of America to acknowledge Hezbollah as the national guard of Lebanon, while requesting Hezbollah’s withdrawal from Syria.

Twelfth, the United States of America shall withdraw all military forces from Africa by the end of 2014:

1. The United States of America shall withdraw all military forces from Somali by the end of the year 2014 and should not oppose restoration of the legitimate government of Somali – the union of islamic courts and the national guard of Somali – Al Shabab.
2. The United States of America shall withdraw it participation from the ill-conceived peacekeeping operations in Mali and CAR, should call for peaceful negotiations between the Mali dictatorship and self-defense militias of the Tuareg people either to establish the federative state of Mali with Azawad as its sovereign, autonomous and self-governing province, or to prove for peaceful secession of Azawad from Mali as a solution acceptable to both parties, should call for peaceful negotiations between Christian CAR self-defense militias and islamic CAR self-defense militias to establish the federative state of Christian CAR province and islamic CAR province as a solution acceptable to both parties, and for transfer of responsibility for peacekeeping operations in Mali and CAR to the African union.

The United States of America needs to end the misnamed war against terrorism, which is in fact war against islam: genuine terrorists, who kill civilians for no objective reasons, are few in number, and can be captured or killed without any wars on terrorism.

The foreign policy of freedom requires changes in US armed forces. It is important to preserve US strategic and tactical nuclear missile forces in current numbers, essential for national defense of the United States, to preserve the US navy with 200,000 marines of US marine corps, the US air force, the US missile defense system, adequately scaled back. The United States of America cannot and will not keep a standing army in peacetime: the US army should be disbanded by the year 2020, with the US national guard commanded by US state governors, and consisting of weapon owning citizens, taking its place. It is important to organize, train and arm two rapid response brigades of the US national guard in each US state, 10,000 US national guardsmen in each brigade, 20,000 US national guardsmen in each US state, to be able to be deployed in their respective US state within 24 hours and anywhere in the world within 72 hours, one million US national guardsmen in total in rapid response brigades of the US national guard. The US national defense budget should be scaled back from nearly 700 billion USD to no more than 200 billion USD annually by the year 2020 to eliminate enormous US budget deficit. US citizens will be permitted to own the so-called assault weapons, including automatic rifles, machine guns, portable grenade launchers, hand grenades and appropriate munitions without restrictions. Furthermore, US citizens will be permitted to own portable rocket launchers, portable anti-aircraft missiles, portable anti-tank missiles, portable naval missiles, explosives and appropriate munitions as guardsmen of the US national guard.

The foreign policy of freedom should be pursued by the republican party of America, and republican, conservative, nationalist, patriotic and fundamentalist US citizens, that needs to prepare America for defensive war against the Russian federation as well as for defensive war against the coalition of the Russian federation, China and Iran, if such a coalition arises and pursues wars of aggression against the EU or NATO member-states.
fdtwain is offline  
Old April 17th, 2016, 11:21 AM   #15
Banned
 
fdtwain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Europe
Posts: 618
Addressing the impact of the greatest depression in America

The economic situation of the United States of America is worsening as the result of the impact of the greatest depression in America

The US government debt is at present 17.5 trillion USD, of which 12.6 trillion USD is held by the public. With the obama administration the US government debt grew by 7.2 billion USD, or by more than 70%, massively overspending in peacetime. The US maximum debt carrying capacity estimated as 10% of US federal revenues over the last seven years is 1.9 trillion USD, while the insolvency boundary, indicating impossibility of repayment of US government debt and rendering the US credit rating as D, is nine times the maximum US debt carrying capacity, 17.1 trillion USD. It is obvious that the US cannot repay or service its debts in the long term, and once the insolvency boundary is crossed, the default on the US government debt becomes inevitable.

The US government budget deficit in the budget year 2013 amounted to 680 billion USD, or 24% of the budget revenues in the budget year 2013.

The current account deficit as measured by balance of trade in goods was 700 billion USD in the year 2013.

The situation with unemployment rate in US worsened dramatically. Out of 246.7 million American employees, available for employment in 2013, only 144.6 million American employees hold jobs, which translates into 102.1 million American workers, either short-term unemployed or long-term unemployed. If the historical ratio of one half of these American employees actually qualified for work is taken into account, this translates into 51 million unemployed American citizens, or the real unemployment rate of 20.7% in 2013.

The real US inflation rate as measured by CPI, estimated on the basis of 1980 methodology of the US government, focused on agricultural and consumer goods, was 8.9% in 2013.

All these objective economic facts point to the continuation of the greatest depression in the United States of America. And to address the impact of the greatest depression in America, firm and consistent measures need to be taken.

It is important for the republican party of America to repeal the so-called affordable health care act, known as obamacare, in its entirety, despite any resistance.

The so-called individual mandate, the requirement to purchase medical insurance, opens a back door to slavery in the United States of America.

It is important to understand that medical care in human history has never been a right and always a privilege. Provision of medical care to those prudent enough to store part of their income to cover health care expenditures ensured their better health and longer lifespan as well as healthier and more abundant progeny, allowing for gradual racial improvement with each new generation. Similarly, withdrawal of medical care from those unproductive and imprudent, unable to pay its costs, shortens their lifespan and makes their progeny less numerous, naturally reducing the numbers of the weaker and dumber part of human population that generally reproduces more abundantly, relieving their burden upon human society. Christian societies developed a successful way for Christians willing to help the poor members of society to access medical care: provision of free medical care in charitable clinics, and taking Hippocratic oath seriously, by providing medical care to the poor in exchange for what they are able to pay without hardship. Thus, provision of medical care belongs primarily to the private sector or charitable organizations, and any attempts at provision of medical care at the federal level are illegitimate, as the US constitution does not give the US federal government the power to regulate healthcare.

The appropriate way to extend any government subsidies for health care is at district and state level out of social security taxes through which no more than 10% of taxpayer’s income is collected after all other social security needs of the population are met. Any other attempts to extend subsidies for medical care lead to manifold increase in costs of medical care, rationing of medical care, reduction in the rate of medical innovations, and dehumanization of patients, the extreme examples of which happen in Russia where healthy unborn babies are aborted, and organs are extracted from healthy men and women in state medical facilities to provide transplants for the wealthy and the powerful.

Currently, large federal subsidies for medical care through medicare and medicaid programs, directed to medical insurance companies and large hospitals that cooperate with them, costly and time-consuming process for approval of new medical drugs and procedures, lack of limited responsibility for medical professionals for malpractice, cumbersome licensing requirements for medical professionals have driven up the prices of medical insurance and health care 2-3 times above the real costs of medical care and significantly lowered the quality of medical care available to most Americans. As a result, many poor and middle class American families cannot afford health insurance, and make a free and rational choice to remain uninsured. Consequently, US insurance companies and hospitals are increasingly losing income. Unhappy with decreased revenue, US medical and insurance industry lobbyists in US congress have encouraged US congress to pass the affordable medical care act to force middle class American families either purchase medical insurance or pay a penalty to the US government to be used to subsidize free medical care for the poor Americans. This legislation is a huge taxpayer-funded subsidy to US insurance and medical industry, yet it involves many existential dangers, mortal to the cause of liberty in America. Essentially, passage of this legislation is declaration of civil war upon the remnant of individualist God-fearing Americans who actually built America, opening a back door to slavery.

There are many dangers associated with the requirement to purchase medical insurance. One is associated with the disclosure of medical and genetic information, collected by insurance companies, increasingly digitalized and easily available to prospective employers of an insured person. As a result, sick people or people predisposed to sickness, yet able to work productively, will inevitably see the pool of employment choices severely restricted as a result of passage of this legislation. Additionally, the legislation will further forcefully impose the use of social security numbers, being precursor to implantation of microchips in US population devised by global economic, social and ethnic elites as a control mechanism over the behavior of Americans. Finally, this legislation unlawfully and groundlessly seeks to interfere with the derivative-natural right to economic freedom and derivative-natural right to live one’s own life as one sees fit by attempting to force Americans with alternative lifestyles to work to cover the costs of medical insurance they consciously and willingly refused to take up, preferring a shorter lifespan life of increased leisure. Essentially, this unlawful and groundless legislation seeks to open a door to slavery, to enslave those Americans unwilling to support the democratic political and globalist capitalist economic system for the benefit of globalist economic, social and ethnic elites.

It is essential to remember the definition of the derivative-natural right to economic freedom: an individual right either to refuse to take part in an economic transaction according to one’s own will or to freely engage in an economic transaction on terms acceptable to such an individual. Any interference with the above-mentioned right constitutes enslavement of man, unless the way of exercising of the above-mentioned right is clearly, directly and significantly hazardous to other people’s life and health. In the above-mentioned case the refusal of some Americans to purchase medical insurance harms other people’s life and health in no way: those willing to purchase medical insurance can still work, earn a living and purchase medical insurance out of fruits of their own labor if they wish so. At the same time, provision of emergency medical care is not an inherent human right, but a privilege, conditional upon covering the costs of medical care. While in well-organized societies the natural right to life may include provision of emergency medical care, it is done voluntarily out of morality and charity shared by those engaged in medical profession, and not by compulsory legislation, for the natural right to life does not include the right to be forcefully kept alive against the individual will or the right of an individual to be kept alive at other people’s expense beyond provision of employment, paying monthly wages sufficient for purchase of decent food, clothing, covering costs of constructing an adequate residence, and leaving 1/3 to be spent as an individual wishes to all willing to undertake employment - that is, the current market value of 30 ounces of silver, or giving those unable to find employment a subsidy to begin their own business once every 7 years - that is, the current market value of 2,520 ounces of silver, paid out of tax revenues collected from social tax of no more than 10% of annual income of individuals and corporations. In fact, as Plato and Socrates wisely noted many thousand years ago, a man obeying the commandments of God does not need medical care, and sickness is usually a result of a sinful or reckless lifestyle, so a well-organized God-fearing republic needs few doctors. Therefore, an appropriate way of dealing with growing costs of medical care is deregulation of medical profession and repeal of obligation of hospitals to extend medical care to those unable to afford it.

After the affordable medical care act was passed, the group of individuals and states rightfully concerned with its implications for liberty in the US, sued in federal court to have it declared unconstitutional, being clearly outside of the scope of congressional authority and contrary to the 10th amendment to the US constitution. The US appeal court struck down the so-called individual mandate, but the US supreme court reversed the ruling, re-establishing the individual mandate, the individual requirement to purchase medical insurance, while allowing states to opt-out of the requirements of the legislation. The US supreme court decision is very dangerous by seeking to compel millions of Americans to engage in the market for medical insurance, many of whom will simply not have sufficient income to do so, forcing them to purchase a product they do not necessarily need or to pay a penalty to the federal government to be used to subsidize other people’s medical care. Even more dangerous are groundless and outrageous claims of the US supreme court in the text of the decision that US congress is free to order US citizens to behave in a certain manner within the scope of its authority, imposing as punishments imprisonment, deprivation of civil rights and even loss of children’s custody as punishment for non-compliance. In fact, the death penalty and imprisonment for the period not exceeding seven years as punishments can only be used with regard to the crimes of violence and the crimes of grave moral turpitude of homosexuality, lesbianism, bestiality, incest, pedophilia (sexual relations with girls below 12 years of age), change of gender, human cloning. All other acts proscribed by law, insofar not contrary to natural rights, derivative-natural rights, civil rights can constitute either misdemeanors punished by double restitution of actual damages, corporal punishment up to ten lashes, fines not exceeding the market value of 14,700 ounces of silver, or civil infractions, subject to civil penalties. As for lawless decisions of the US supreme court, permitting criminal punishments where no crime of violence or no crime of great moral turpitude has been committed, such should be repealed swiftly.

Otherwise, the United States as many other states, nations and peoples that existed in the past will learn the hard way that every state, nation or people, no matter how advanced, that dares to interfere with natural rights, derivative-natural rights, civil rights of residents and citizens on its territory is swiftly destroyed as history manifested so many times. In fact, the affordable medical care act is clearly unconstitutional legislation, as four dissenting judges of the US supreme court, and especially forcefully the US supreme court judge Antonin Scalia clearly established, and was affirmed for political reasons by machinations of two jewish justices, kagan and ginsburg, long known to support the legislation in question, and betrayal of duty by neoconservative judge roberts. As in ancient Athens where similar legislation led to enslavement of a wide part of Athenian society, and a civil war in Athens that was ended by the reforms of great republican legislator and emancipator Solon the lawgiver, who abolished unjust laws, the affordable medical care act is opening a back door to enslavement of the US poor and middle-class and is essentially the declaration of war upon the US poor and middle class by global economic, social and ethnic elites, seeking to live in luxury of other people’s labor. Essentially, the affordable medical care act declares that Americans should have a particular level of civilization, which medical care entails whether they earned it or not, and whether a society has means to achieve it or not, subjecting those unable or unwilling to provide for it to a significant penalty to be used to subsidize that civilization level for others.

It is true that penalties imposed by the affordable medical care act have not been enforced so far, beyond allowing the IRS to deduct the penalty from the tax refund. But US history clearly shows that it is only a question of time until mandates on individual citizens are extended to education and other areas with severe penalties for non-compliance, and non-paid penalties are treated as tax debts, since the US supreme court groundlessly declared a penalty to be a tax, having specifically disregarded the well-known facts that taxes, in contrast to penalties, are collected for engaging in commercial taxable activity, and not for inactivity. Increasingly, the US supreme court unlawfully and groundlessly permits US congress to penalize people for making the private choices the majority of US citizens do not approve and that do not clearly, directly or significantly affect them in any way, which is a textbook definition of tyranny, enslavement of men by the government. But the human community consists not only of the individuals whose life choices are acceptable to the majority of men, but also of those whose life choices may be reckless, unacceptable or even abhorrent to the majority of men. Yet, short of the abominable deeds of sexual perversions (homosexuality, lesbianism, bestiality, incest, pedophilia (sexual relations with girls below 12 years of age)), abominations (child murders (abortions), change of gender, cannibalism, human cloning), those choices are their private matter, for which the government can subject them to no penalties whatsoever.

Furthermore, the US federal government simply does not have revenue to fund obamacare. US federal budget deficit in 2013 is 680 billion USD, and annual costs of obamacare are estimated to be additional 200-350 billion USD a year over the next 5 years. Reasonable estimates suggest health insurance premiums actually being 20-30% higher for obamacare participants in comparison with present health insurance policies. Finally, the costs of healthcare insurance and healthcare in general will skyrocket: when the individuals who lead risky lifestyles realize that their healthcare costs - consequences of their free lifestyle choices - are funded by prudent and hard-working citizens, such individuals will lead even riskier lifestyles, indulging in drugs, alcohol, smoking, sexual excesses and perversions with predictable health consequences for which others will be forced to pay.

The affordable medical care act could and should be nullified by the US states and repealed by US congress. As senator Cruz has correctly stated, obamacare can be defeated and will be defeated, and US citizens need to be explained that obamacare makes no sense either to them or to the US federal government, and is in fact a Ponzi scheme dangerous for American freedom. The US supreme court should also reconsider its decision and struck down the obamacare individual mandate, inconsistent with the derivative-natural right to economic freedom, given manifold dangers of this legislation. Yet this legislation manifests a dangerous trend towards enslavement of US citizens and residents by the US government. Thus, republican, conservative, patriotic, nationalist and fundamentalist US citizens should not comply with either the individual mandate or penalty and prepare their arms to be ready to shoot those US bureaucrats, representatives and statesmen who try to arrest, imprison, condemn to forced labor, condemn to forced medical treatment, kill or wound them, take property, take children for non-complying with individual mandates, bearing neither legal nor moral responsibility, fulfilling the clear commandment of God:

Exodus 21:16
And he that stealeth a man and selleth him or if he be found in his hand he shall surely be put to death

This legislation crosses the Rubicon between civil peace and civil strife, between a free republic and totalitarian democracy in America. Thus it is necessary for republican, conservative, patriotic, nationalist and fundamentalist US citizens to be ready to resist with law and arms the government enslavers seeking to enslave men for common good as they claim, to swiftly finish off government enslavers and to send government enslavers where those properly belong - to hell. Yet this legislation is only a part of present dangers to freedom of the American people.

Furthermore, it is important for the republican party of America to repeal the so-called foreign account tax compliance act, known as FATCA, in its entirety, and to dissolve all treaties with foreign nations, signed in accordance with its provisions, despite any resistance.

FATCA blatantly and egregiously violates sacred national sovereignty of foreign nations by unlawfully and groundlessly requiring foreign financial institutions to communicate personal data of US citizens to the US government and act as de-facto enforcers of US laws, even if such foreign financial institutions do not conduct operations in the United States of America, thereby blatantly and egregiously violating sacred national sovereignty of foreign nations, to which alone pertains regulation of their financial institutions, not engaging in operation on US soil, as well as privacy of financial data of US citizens and residents. It is lawful, wise and proper for foreign nations not to comply with any and all provisions of FATCA and ignore all US threats for non-compliance with FATCA: a clearly unconstitutional FATCA, exceeding legitimate powers of the federal government of the United States of America, is without legal effect, being in contradiction of both the constitution of the United States of America, that restraints sovereignty of the United States of America to the territory within its borders, and international law. Furthermore, it is important for the US government not to impose any taxation obligations of US citizens who give up US citizenship, and US permanent residents who give up US permanent residence, permitting those who desire to give up US citizenship or US permanent residence to do so in peace.

Another danger to American freedom is growing US federal budget deficit - 680 billion USD in 2013 - that results in growing US government debt. There is only one reasonable way out of the present mess - to balance the US budget:

- by reducing by 500 billion USD annual US defense expenditures through ending the misnamed war on terrorism, withdrawal of US armed forces from overseas over the next seven years, transfer of US overseas military bases to the nations within which US overseas military bases are situated, dissolution of the US army, strengthening the national guard of the US states, and concentration of defense spending upon the US navy and marine corps, the US air force, the US missile defense system, the US strategic and tactical nuclear forces, which are sufficient to address any existing threats to US national defense in peacetime;
- abolishing Medicare/Medicaid, saving 950 billion USD;
- abolishing US education department and discontinuation of the US federal educational loans and grants program, saving 70 billion USD;
- abolishing the US department of homeland security, dangerous to American freedom, and investigating its activities, saving 60 billion USD;
- abolishing EPA, NSF and SEC, saving 20 billion USD.

In such a way the US federal budget is balanced, beginning with the budget year 2015, and 700 billion USD annually are freed towards repayment of US government debt.

If these budget objectives cannot be immediately achieved, then it is important:

- to limit at 500 billion USD annually US defense expenditures till 2020, of which 100 billion belonging to the department of veteran affairs, merged with the US department of defense, through ending the misnamed war on terrorism, withdrawal of US armed forces from overseas over the next seven years, transfer of US overseas military bases to the nations within which US overseas military bases are situated, dissolution of the US army, strengthening the national guard of the US states, and concentration of defense spending upon the US navy and marine corps, the US air force, the US missile defense system, the US strategic and tactical nuclear forces, which are sufficient to address any existing threats to US national defense in peacetime, saving 310 billion USD;
- to limit Medicare/Medicaid spending to 500 billion USD annually, by restricting it to emergency and essential medical care, saving 440 billion USD;
- to abolish US education department and discontinue the US federal educational loans and grants program, saving 70 billion USD;
- to abolish the US department of homeland security, dangerous to American freedom, and investigate its activities, saving 60 billion USD;
- to abolish EPA, NSF and SEC, saving 20 billion USD.

In such a way the US federal budget is balanced, beginning with the budget year 2015, and 200 billion USD annually are freed towards repayment of US government debt.

It is essential for the republican party of America:

- to abolish the department of homeland security and investigate its activities, the United States of America as any free state does not have a place for any agency or a department with the word ‘security’ in it;
- to abolish EPA, to repeal national environment protection act and clean air act, permitting US states to undertake their own environmental policy as US states see fit, to which environmental policy properly belongs;
- to abolish the US education department, discontinue federal educational loans and grants program, and make education loans dischargeable at bankruptcy as any other debts – there is no place for slavery of any kind in the United States of America, and education is exclusively a matter for US states;
- to abolish national science foundation, as promotion of sciences pertains to American industry;
- to abolish the US security and exchange commission and to repeal insider trading laws, which serve no useful purposes, but are misused to persecute unpopular American entrepreneurs for engaging in business: insider trading laws serve no useful purpose, preventing swift and efficient price discovery in competitive markets.

Good news is that the US export-import bank offering lavish subsidies to US and foreign corporations will reportedly be finally de-funded: US and foreign corporations need to compete in free markets, not to seek government subsidies, and US and foreign corporations are rich enough to establish and fund a private institution with similar functions.

Subsequently, US government debt should be restructured: all debt held by US federal agencies should be retired, 70% of the face value of the outstanding US government debt to the public written off, the remaining US federal debt of 3.8 trillion USD should be converted into 7- year 2% US government bonds, and annually 600 billion USD allocated to pay interest and repay the US federal debt. In such a way the US federal debt is repaid in seven years, and approximately 250 billion USD annually that are presently used to cover interest expenses remain to cover emergency transitional spending associated with such profound restructuring of the US federal government and US government debt, permitting to significantly reduce US taxes within seven years. Regrettably, this is objectively the only realistic way of restructuring US debt, and any suggestions to increase US debt ceiling should be rejected by US congress, no matter how hard those suggestions are peddled and whoever peddles them.

Additionally, two constitutional amendments should be passed by US Congress: one amendment, the balanced budget amendment, should prohibit government spending in excess of tax revenues in times of peace, the other amendment, the debt limit amendment, should prohibit incurring national debt in excess of 10% of government tax revenues within the last seven years in times of peace, incurring national debt in excess of 20% of government tax revenues within the last seven years in times of war, and permit one time unilateral restructuring of US government debt, writing off all intra-government holdings of US government debt and 70% of the nominal value of the US government debt held by the public. It is obvious that 1.9 trillion USD in US government spending is more than enough to win any war even against a great regional power, and if a war continues, which is highly unlikely, additional US government debt can be authorized by a constitutional amendment. The appropriate way of passing the balanced budget amendment is through the both houses of the US Congress: the US republican party should require a recorded vote and identify to US voters each US congressman and senator who objects to the balanced budget amendment. Similar balanced budget amendments with regard to US state budgets, prohibiting state government spending in excess of state tax revenues, need to be passed by US state legislatures.

The obama administration claims it can repay US government debt by simply printing the necessary amount of money, which is of course true to a point. Yet the consequences of such debt repayment are well known: triple digit inflation, destruction of hundreds of millions of the poor and middle class Americans, who will not be able to afford even food and clothing, and sale of the best US assets to foreigners, and a rebellion as the result. Hence, it is not a realistic alternative, even though at some point the United States may have no other choice but to repay its debt in such a destructive way.

Furthermore, it is important for the republican party of America to reduce US minimal wage to 6.25 USD per work hour, which translates to 250USD per 40 hours work week, and 1,000 USD per month of 160 hours work, to address growing unemployment in the United States of America.

Additionally, no amnesty laws to illegal immigrants to the United States of America shall be passed, beyond offering amnesty to the illegal immigrants who married US citizens and produced children in marriage. The United States of America is already generous to immigrants, giving citizenship to all persons born on the US soil as well as to children, one parent of which is US citizen. It is clear that with present 20.7% real unemployment rate, the US government should concentrate on deporting all illegal immigrants, in particular all illegal immigrants who committed felony crimes, except for those illegal immigrants who married US citizens and produced children in marriage. Furthermore, voluntary repatriation programs shall be established in the United States of America for all negroes, latinos, Asians, US citizens and non-citizens alike to permit them to return to Africa, Latin America and Asia to seek happiness in their own homelands.

Furthermore, it is important for the republican party of America to repeal the US civil rights act of 1964 and all federal anti-discrimination laws: anti-discrimination policy pertains to US states.

US state legislatures shall swiftly establish gold and silver dollar coins and bullion as legal tender equal to US federal reserve promissory notes within US states, with ratio between gold and silver coins and bullion and exchange rate between US federal reserve promissory notes and gold and silver coins and bullion freely determined by the market.

It is important for the US republican party to return as transitional measure till 2020 to the US taxation law of competent and moral US treasury secretary Andrew Mellon: establishing the federal income tax rate of 25% on annual profits of all US corporations, making income of first 12,000 USD annually per US citizen tax deducible for the purposes of federal income tax in place of all other income tax dedications, establishing 10% federal income tax on annual income of the US citizen not exceeding 60,000USD per US citizen, and establishing 25% federal income tax on all annual income exceeding 60,000USD per US citizen. Furthermore, it is important for the US republican party to repeal the duty to present annual tax declarations for all US citizens earning less than 12,000 USD annually per US citizen.

It is also important for the US republican party to draft and present for debate the social security reform law, abolishing Medicare and Medicaid in its entirety beginning with the year 2020, abolishing unemployment insurance and transferring the social security pensions program to US states to be funded out of 10% social security tax on all incomes of US citizens exceeding of 12,000 USD per US citizen

Appropriate US state and federal laws shall be passed to prohibit forceful imposition of electronic numbers for taxpayers and social security identification, forceful imposition of any marks, numbers, writings, microchips upon human skin or inside human body for any reason, forceful collection and storage of biometric information as fingerprints, eye scan, DNA-samples, without a written court order supported by clear and compelling evidence sufficient to accuse of felony a person from whom biometric evidence is collected in the territory of the United States. US citizens shall be given an option to be accounted for tax and social security purposes under their names, birthdates, places of birth and digital photographs, which are sufficient. Furthermore, prosecution of those who wound and kill the persons who forcefully impose any marks, numbers, writings, microchips upon human skin or inside human body for any reason shall be prohibited in the territory of the United States of America.

It is also important for the US federal government to treat US taxpayers respectfully. Characteristic is the case of rancher Cliven Bundy, who graze his cattle on the land that properly belongs to the state of Nevada in accordance with his traditional grazing rights, yet was attacked by armed US federal government employees, who attempted to unlawfully and groundlessly extract from him grazing fees in violation of his traditional grazing rights. It is important for US federal courts to recognize traditional grazing rights of Cliven Bundy, that existed for more than 50 years, and therefore must be respected by the US federal government, irrespective of legislation adopted later, and for the US federal government to write off the whole amount of grazing fees that the US federal government attempted to extract from Cliven Bundy. Reportedly, some US politicians even called Cliven Bundy a “domestic terrorist”, although he is not a terrorist but an American patriot protecting his traditional rights, and the brave American lads of the Nevada militia that protect his traditional rights from usurpation by the US federal government deserve praise and admiration from every American patriot.

It is important for the US republican party to draft, present to US Congress and pass the appropriate legislation restoring land, currently owned by the US federal government, in excess of 3% of the territory of each US state, to the ownership of each US state, in accordance with the vision of the Founders of the United States of America.

It is important for the United States of America to gradually continue negotiations on the EU-US free trade agreement, not unduly streamlining these negotiations, but rather adequately protecting the economic interests of US agriculture and industry during these negotiations. US Congress shall not give any fast-track negotiation authority with regard to free trade deals to obama administration, but shall thoroughly review and debate the EU-US free trade agreement.

Furthermore, it is important to gradually continue negotiations on the US free trade agreement with Asian allies, not unduly streamlining these negotiations, but rather adequately protecting the economic interests of US agriculture and industry during these negotiations. US Congress shall not give any fast-track negotiation authority with regard to free trade deals to the obama administration, but shall thoroughly review and debate the US free trade agreement with Asian allies.

It is important for the US republican president, once elected in 2016, to immediately approve construction of the Keystone pipeline, essential for adequately meeting US energy needs.

It is also important for the republican party of America to repeal the US copyright laws, limiting copyright to what it legitimately covers: trademarks and useful inventions, realizable in industrial models, for the term of no longer than seven years, prolonged for seven years more, if commercial exploitation of a useful invention began.

The United States of America indeed presently comes through perilous times, yet dangers to American freedom shall be swiftly and courageously addressed by the republican party of America and republican, conservative, nationalist, patriotic and fundamentalist American citizens: obamacare and FATCA shall be repealed, despite all resistance, US budget deficit shall be balanced and US government debt should be restructured to secure the blessings of liberty to US citizens and not to permit slavery to return through a back door to the land of the free United States of America, a truly exceptional nation.
fdtwain is offline  
Old April 17th, 2016, 11:22 AM   #16
Banned
 
fdtwain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Europe
Posts: 618
Protecting American freedom

The threats to American freedom are numerous, yet these threats can still be overcome by the American people.

It is important to understand that there can be no security on earth to the great majority of men and women: even Lord God Jehovah promises security (Leviticus 18:5) solely to 144,000 righteous jews residing in the state of Israel limited by the Nile, the Euphrates, the borders of Syria, Iraq, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Sudan and Egypt (Revelation 7), while Lord Jesus Christ promises security (John 8:51) solely to a small number of elect Christians (Luke 18:. Therefore, when any official, representative or statesman of the US government speaks of security, such an official, representative or statesman of the US government, whoever he is, or any official, representative or statesman of any government or any international organization lies, deceives and deludes men: a reasonable man or woman shall laugh at his or her face and leave. Benjamin Franklin puts it well: he who gives up liberty for security, deserves neither, and will get none.

Therefore, the American republic shall seek:

- natural order and public order as its part exclusively through civil law, investigating and prosecuting misdemeanors;
- public safety through criminal law, investigating and prosecuting felonies;
- national defense by dissolving the US army, strengthening the US national guard, and preserving the US Navy, the US marine corps, the US air force, the US missile defense system, the US strategic and tactical nuclear forces.

First, the infamous patriot act was passed, even though the majority of US representatives and senators did not read it, infringing upon the numerous constitutional rights of American citizens protected in the first 10 amendments to the US constitution. The patriot act has not made the US safe, contrary to the false claims of its supporters in the Bush administration, quite the opposite: violation of the constitutional rights of American citizens has failed to deter numerous terrorist acts and politically-motivated murders carried out within the United States by foreign intelligence agencies, militant groups and international economic, social and ethnic elites, the last of which was the Tsarnaev terrorist attack, which could well have been organized by the Russian-appointed Chechenian warlord kadyrov, who ordered a number of assassinations of the Chechenians to be carried out in Turkey and Europe. It is obvious that the patriot act in its entirety shall be swiftly repealed, despite any resistance, as it infringes upon numerous constitutional rights of American citizens, protected in the first 10 amendments to the US constitution, and has failed to make the United States of America safe.

Second, the department of homeland security was created out of 22 independent agencies that were kept separate for a good reason, which reportedly created an unconstitutional national police force. The department of homeland security has failed to make the United States of America safer as numerous mass shootings throughout the United States indicated, and shall be swiftly abolished: the United States of America is a free state, in which there is no place to any government agency with the word “security” in it. Some of the federal agencies comprising the department of homeland security, in particular, the infamous ATF that has committed grave crimes against American citizens, should be abolished outright and their activities investigated by the US Congress, while other federal agencies should regain their independence. The record of the zionist ex-head of the department of homeland security michael chertoff should be investigated by an independent prosecutor appointed to determine whether the constitutional rights of the United States citizens suspected of so-called domestic terrorism - that is, American dissidents - were violated by the department of homeland security employees, issuing the open report to the US Congress.

Third, US intelligence and law enforcement agencies routinely violate the US constitution, conspiring with foreign intelligence and law enforcement agencies to violate the constitutional rights of US citizens and natural rights and derivative-natural rights of foreign citizens, endangering the constitutionally protected rights and freedoms of US citizens and the republican constitutional order of the United States of America.

In particular, the CIA ran illegal torture, kidnapping and rendition operations in a number of European, Latin American, Middle Eastern and African countries, kidnapping, torturing and murdering thousands of foreign citizens. Torture is cruel and unusual punishment, prohibited by the US constitution, and kidnapping, slavery and murder are capital federal crimes in the United States, punished by a death penalty in all cases. The US Congress should appoint an independent congressional prosecutor to thoroughly clean the CIA, to compile, present to Congress and disseminate to the American people the report of CIA illegal activities, in particular, torture, kidnapping and rendition operations, and at least to dismiss from US government positions all CIA operatives involved in torture, kidnapping and rendition operations. The fact that other intelligence agencies do so should not lower US constitutional standards, in particular, prohibition of torture, kidnapping and murder of those who did not commit the abominable deeds of sexual perversions (homosexuality, lesbianism, bestiality, incest, pedophilia (sexual relations with girls below 12 years of age)), abominations (child murders (abortions), change of gender, cannibalism, human cloning), intentional murder, enslavement of men/women or selling of men/women to slavery.

The NSA as it is spectacularly reported is engaging in fishing expeditions, recording and analyzing all internet traffic and phone messages throughout the United States, and reportedly compiling the extended databases on US and foreign citizens, permitting to arbitrary and without due process of law deny and extend certain privileges and rights to them – the activities that are prohibited in the fourth amendment to the US constitution. Recording and analyzing internet traffic and phone messages is permitted solely subject to a court order issued upon a probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized - that is, with regard to particular persons and places for federal felony investigations by the FBI or foreign intelligence purposes by the NSA. The situation in the NSA is particularly dangerous, since the extended databases on US and foreign citizens it has compiled permits to target US citizens for unlawful prosecution or assassination, and even create a totalitarian surveillance state in the USA, not dissimilar to the one described in chapter 13 of the Book of Revelation.

There are also unconfirmed reports of murders of technical and IT specialists and whistleblowers, in particular, in Europe, who reported to their peoples and the American people the dangers of the constitutionally prohibited activities in which the NSA routinely engages, or refused to take part in such activities. The case of Mr. Snowden, who decided to report to the American people in a spectacular manner the violations of constitutionally protected rights by the NSA, will hopefully have a positive ending. Mr. Snowden is of course not a fugitive from justice, as political crimes as espionage, incitement of hatred, incitement to violence or terrorism, insider trading, extremism, etc. are not common crimes that can be pursued internationally, but criminalized conduct specific to a particular nation, which a nation can pursue solely with regard to its citizens who voluntarily accepted citizenship of a nation, in national courts, while justice refers to acts criminal in nature, which all civilized nations have regarded in the past and still regard as criminal, i.e., intentional murder, rape, physical assault, kidnapping, slavery, piracy, etc. Regretfully, in modern world some try to make political crimes into common crimes, which is not possible, simply because what is espionage or incitement in one country may not be regarded as espionage and incitement in another country, and do not refer to the conduct condemned internationally, even if some wish to condemn such conduct internationally, but refer to the conduct which some nations reasonably may tolerate or even justify in particular political circumstances. Similarly, the fact that Mr. Snowden may have cooperated with foreign intelligence agencies as some suggest, and his strange desire to seek a refuge with the Russian dictatorship, which monitors the behavior of its citizens and violates their natural rights, derivative-natural rights, and civil rights in a far greater degree than the federal government of the United States, do not change the fact that he reports genuine violations of the constitutional rights of US citizens by the NSA. Thus, if Mr. Snowden returns to the US, he may face trial for espionage, if he indeed is a foreign spy, but the United States of America cannot demand his extradition, as he is not a fugitive from justice, but a genuine American dissident unhappy with what any reasonable man may objectively regard as systemic violations of the constitutional rights of US citizens by a US federal agency.

A reasonable solution will be for Venezuela to grant Mr. Snowden permanent residence and issue an appropriate permanent residence permit in accordance with the wishes of its venerated diseased president Hugo Chavez, and to book a charter flight for Mr. Snowden to fly to Venezuela, avoiding the territory of the USA, Canada, and the EU and EFTA nations. If this happens, there shall be no conspiracies to prevent Mr. Snowden from traveling to his new homeland as with diversion of the plane of the Bolivian president Evo Morales, which is not acceptable and only fuels anti-Americanism and Euroscepticism in America. Regretfully, the Greek technicians murdered by MI6, who threatened to reveal the system of monitoring of cell phones in Greece by the NSA and European intelligence agencies, were not as fortunate as Mr. Snowden.

More importantly, the US Congress shall swiftly hold a congressional hearing on the NSA, and swiftly develop a bill to restrain its activities in accordance with the provisions of the fourth amendment to the US constitution and destroy the extensive NSA databases on US citizens and foreign citizens who are not persons of interest in foreign intelligence gathering activities, and see that this bill is actually implemented in the NSA. NSA fishing expeditions should end because they are dangerous to the constitutional rights of US citizens and US republican system of government. There are reportedly ties to mossad-affiliated businesses in the NSA: these ties should end. Furthermore, the republican party of America shall draft and present to the US Congress for debate and approval a law merging the NSA unto the CIA.

The FBI is reportedly regularly conspiring with foreign law enforcement agencies to entrap US citizens, entice US citizens into the EU nations to have them imprisoned or murdered by European law enforcement or intelligence agencies in violation of their constitutional rights. Especially pronounced such criminal activities of the FBI have become under its present head Robert Mueller. A case in point is the story of Mr. Gary Lauck, an American national-socialist, whose travel plans were reported by the FBI to the EU nations that arrested him and tried him essentially for his national-socialist beliefs protected constitutionally in the United States, sentencing him to four years in prison, and the government of the United States failed to protest the unlawful and groundless sentence with regard to the US citizen whose constitutional rights the government of the United States is obliged to protect by law whether in the United States or abroad. It is obvious that the FBI reporting of Mr. Gary Lauck’s travel plans to the EU nations constitutes violation of US law and abuse of power of the US federal government, for which criminal charges with regard to those responsible may be warranted. However reprehensible Mr. Gary Lauck’s view may be, he is entitled to the protection of US law and the US diplomatic service, and respect of his constitutional rights by the US government, especially given that the EU nations should have refused him entry to their territory if unwilling to tolerate his activities on their territory.
The FBI is engaged in a number of unwarranted investigations of legitimate US civil associations and churches, reportedly upon pressure by zionist, jewish and Israeli groups, i.e. groundlessly classifying ‘the national alliance’, a US civil association founded by a doctor of physics, as a terrorist group because of some violent acts committed by the former members of ‘the national alliance’, over whom ‘the national alliance’ had no control or oversight. As a result, trumpeted charges were issued with regard to US citizen Chester Doles, a ‘national alliance’ activist, and he was imprisoned essentially for his constitutionally protected political views. A church called ‘Aryan nations’, established by a reputable US citizen and a famous inventor Richard Butler, is regularly called a terrorist organization because its members hold to constitutionally protected White separatist views. Finally, the pastor of another religious group called Creativity church, and a lawyer by training, Matthew Hale, was unlawfully and groundlessly sentenced to 40-year imprisonment, allegedly for conspiring to kill a federal judge, although no evidence of such criminal conspiracy whatsoever was presented at his jury trial, and the whole case was based on surmises by a federal informant, seeking to entrap Matthew Hale, while Matthew Hale specifically denied participation in his criminal conspiracy. However repugnant are his views, Mr. Hale is entitled to his constitutional rights, including the right to a jury of his peers, which as he truthfully claimed was denied to him, and to have his guilt to be proven beyond reasonable doubt by objective and compelling physical evidence, which was not at all presented at his trial. Therefore, Matthew Hale should be swiftly released from prison, apologized to, and compensated for each month of unlawful imprisonment, essentially for his constitutionally protected political and religious views.

It is obvious that under Mr. Mueller’s administration the FBI has strayed from its mission and abused its power, failing to prevent two terrorist attacks: that of September 11, 2001, which was preventable, should the warnings of foreign intelligence agencies have been regarded, and the Boston bombing, which was likely an act of Russian-imposed Chechenian warlord kadyrov, unhappy that his human rights abuses provoke wide outrage in America, who carried out a string of assassinations of his political opponents in European and islamic nations, and which was not preventable, as the FBI currently lacks the capacity to stem terrorist attacks carried out by foreign states inside the United States. The FBI record under Mr. Mueller’s administration should be investigated by an independent prosecutor, appointed by the US Congress, the report of any illegal practices and activities uncovered compiled and reported to the US Congress and the American people, and criminal charges against Mr. Mueller filed, if evidence of conspiracy with foreign states to violate the constitutionally protected rights of the Americans is uncovered. The US churches and civil associations classified by the FBI as terrorist groups because of the acts of former members over which such churches and civil associations exercise no control, should be stricken off the list of terrorist groups, and cooperation with jewish, zionist, Israeli and other civil rights organizations limited solely to alleged federal felonies. The list of federal felony crimes should be reviewed and significantly reduced by the US Congress, the so-called hate crime law repealed by the US Congress in view of unequal application of justice, since in their nature all crimes are hate crimes, and each crime of the same kind should warrant equal punishment to all criminals. FBI cooperation with foreign law enforcement agencies should be significantly reduced and limited to the criminal acts criminal in nature and recognized as crimes worldwide as intentional murder, rape, physical assault, kidnapping, slavery, piracy, etc., and there shall be no permanent FBI presence overseas besides presence mandated by specific investigation, temporary in nature, as such presence tends to lead to collaboration that often violates the constitutionally protected rights of US citizens: FBI mission is primarily limited to the US territory.

It is important to precisely define what are terrorism, militancy and extremism and to delimit zones of responsibility of the CIA, the NSA and the FBI.
Terrorism is murder of civilian population for no objective reason as the Boston bombing carried out by the Tsarnaev brothers. Terrorism acts are few in number, carried out by completely wicked and deranged individuals, negotiations with whom are useless. In dealing with terrorists the proper approach is to kill them if they resist capture, or, if captured and responsible for murder of two or more civilians, to swiftly judge them, sentence to death and execute them. It is important for the US Congress to consider establishing the federal crime of terrorism - murder of two or more civilian US citizens or residents for no objective reason - punished by an automatic death penalty. Terrorists, however, should not be tortured: prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment, including torture - that is, infliction of physical force or physical pain to extract confession - extends to all persons in US custody whether inside the United States of America or overseas.

Terrorist acts inside the US are the sole responsibility of the FBI, terrorist acts against US citizens overseas is the sole responsibility of the CIA. Destruction of US property, if no loss of life is involved, even if done by blasts, is not an act of terrorism. Foreign terrorists outside the United States and the terrorists who are US citizens outside the United States, if such cannot be captured, may be killed by drone attacks authorized by the secretary of defense in association with the director of the CIA in accordance with due process of law proper in such cases. Terrorists inside the United States should normally be arrested and tried in US civil courts, and only when their capture is impossible, or they utterly refuse to surrender can be killed by commanders of the units authorized to capture them.

Militancy/insurgency is more commonplace. A militant/insurgent is a person who has objective grievances, acceptable as such to a reasonable man, against the government of the nation the citizen of which he is, which the government of such a nation refuses to address, and raises arms in support of his cause. A militant detained by the US government overseas or inside the United States is always subject to protections of the Geneva convention, relative to the protection of civilian persons in time of war. It is possible to negotiate a reasonable peace agreement with militants and often when their legitimate grievances are resolved militants eventually return to civilian life. Militants who attack US citizens inside the United States or abroad are the sole responsibility of the US department of defense that should try the militants arrested outside the United States, whether US citizens or not, in US military courts for war crimes or genocide committed by them, or detain them for the duration of hostilities not exceeding seven years, and release them thereafter if no war crimes or genocide are committed by them. Militants arrested inside the United States in times of peace should be tried in US civil courts in accordance with US law.

Foreign militants outside the United States and the militants who are US citizens outside the United States, if such cannot be captured, may be killed by drone attacks authorized by the secretary of defense in accordance with due process of law proper in such cases. Militants inside the United States should normally be arrested and tried in US civil courts, and only when their capture is impossible or they utterly refuse to surrender can be killed by commanders of the units authorized to capture them. All militants who committed no war crimes, killed by the US military, should be buried with military honors as any other killed foreign soldiers.

A good example of a US militant, and not a terrorist as many claimed, is Timothy McVeigh, who correctly perceived his actions as vengeance against the murder of the US citizens belonging to the church branch of David in Waco, TX. While the branch of David was a sect with a strange and immoral lifestyle, it did not warrant the use of the US military and burning alive of the US citizens and their children ordered by the democratic US president clinton. Hence Timothy McVeigh was properly convicted in federal courts, sentenced to death and executed, yet he should have been shot rather than put to death by lethal injection, and buried with military honors as any other US militant, including John Brown.

A good example of foreign militant organization is Ansar-Al-Sharia, which seeks liberation of islamic nations from foreign troops and oppressive dictatorships and creation of islamic states in islamic nations.

Finally, extremism as defined by the council of Europe as refusal to follow commonly accepted ways of life and values is not a crime, nor does it warrant any attention of the CIA, the NSA or the FBI. The United States was founded by men and women, many of whom were extremists and proud of it. Hence, the constitutional rights of extremists so defined, who are US citizens, shall be protected to the fullest extent in the United States of America by the US federal government and by the US department of state overseas, as long as no abominable deeds of sexual perversions (homosexuality, lesbianism, bestiality, incest, pedophilia (sexual relations with girls below 12 years of age)), abominations (child murders (abortions), change of gender, cannibalism, human cloning), intentional murder, enslavement of men/women or selling of men/women to slavery are committed by them. If there are conflicts over ways of life between extremists, who are US citizens, and foreign nations, foreign nations should be asked to drop civil or criminal prosecutions and expel extremists who are US citizens, or simply not let them into their territory in the first place.

In dealing with foreign extremists so defined, who come to the United States because their life or freedom is put in danger due to exercising the derivative-natural rights to absolute freedom of speech, freedom of peaceful assembly and association, freedom of Christian religion, freedom of conscience, the US state department should encourage the foreign state the jurisdiction of which foreign extremists flee to offer reasonable accommodation to foreign extremists, removing danger to life and freedom to foreign extremists in retaliation of exercising the derivative-natural rights to absolute freedom of speech, freedom of peaceful assembly and association, freedom of Christian religion, freedom of conscience, as long as the abominable deeds of sexual perversions (homosexuality, lesbianism, bestiality, incest, pedophilia (sexual relations with girls below 12 years of age)), abominations (child murders (abortions), change of gender, cannibalism, human cloning), intentional murder, enslavement of men/women or selling of men/women to slavery are not committed by them. If such a foreign state utterly refuses to offer a reasonable accommodation to foreign extremists, such foreign extremists should be granted temporary protection from deportation until reasonable accommodation by a foreign state is granted.

In dealing with requests for cooperation of foreign states on extremist individuals and organizations so defined, especially from Russia and China, the United States of America shall automatically reject such requests, informing foreign states that extremism is not a crime in the United States, but a constitutionally protected activity, as such requests conceal political repressions against undesirable individuals, who dissent from the policies of their states and encourage dialogue between foreign states and extremist individuals and organizations so defined with a view of finding reasonable accommodation, acceptable to both parties, and respectful of the derivative-natural rights to absolute freedom of speech, freedom of peaceful assembly and association, freedom of Christian religion, freedom of conscience of extremist individuals and organizations.

In dealing with extremism, it is important to remember that for the United States of America the provisions of the US constitution, including amendments to the US constitution, are superior to international law, including the UN Charter. This means that US extremist organizations so defined, even if run contrary to the goals and purposes of the UN, and engaging in voluntary self-segregation, are entitled to the fullest extent to the protection of the constitutional rights of their members who are US citizens, guaranteed by the constitution of the United States, and to the protection of the derivative-natural rights to absolute freedom of speech, freedom of peaceful assembly and association, freedom of Christian religion, freedom of conscience, the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms of US citizens and residents and the civil right of US citizens to organize, train and arm self-defense militias of the American people, and are free to pursue their objectives and purposes even if their objectives and purposes are contrary to international law, including the UN Charter, as long as such organizations do not engage in genocide or aggressive war. Similarly the activities of foreign extremist organizations and individuals so defined shall not be interfered with by United States agents overseas. The United States of America is not in a war and will never be in a war against extremism so defined, and extremists so defined made great contributions to the economic development of the United States, developing new lifestyles and ways of life that have since become a part of the diverse American people, and creating their parallel societies to gradually become American communities, even if autonomous and self-governed as the Amish. Hence the US senator Barry Goldwater is correct in his saying that extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice, and moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue, and this saying of the honorable American statesmen should properly and wisely guide the US policy in approach to extremism.

Important is the principled US stand towards the United Nations organization: the UN is an international organization of independent and sovereign states, not a world government in the making, and not a god or gods, and the UN shall tolerate and respect the existence of individuals, organizations, peoples, nations, states and international organizations that reject its values, voluntarily refuse to participate in its activities even if such individuals, organizations, peoples, nations, states and international organizations undertake policies contrary to the goals and purposes of the United Nations, as long as such individuals, organizations, peoples, nations, states and international organizations do not engage in aggressive war or genocide. Therefore, the United States of America shall politely request that the UN remove from its charter and international treaties all provisions inconsistent with the derivative-natural rights to absolute freedom of speech, freedom of peaceful assembly and association, freedom of Christian religion, freedom of conscience, the derivative-natural right of citizens and residents of a state to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms, and focus its policies upon its original mission of suppression of aggressive war and genocide, limitation of nuclear weapons, and worldwide prohibition and destruction of chemical and biological weapons, and shall develop and deposit with the UN appropriate reservations with regard to the UN charter and treaties protecting the constitutionally protected rights of American citizens and residents. Furthermore, the republican party of America shall ask the UN to relocate its headquarters from New York to Geneva, Switzerland, as Switzerland is a neutral country, appropriate for hosting the UN headquarters, in which all nations of the world, despite any hostilities among them, may seek peaceful resolution of their disputes whenever possible.

Additionally, the United States of America shall adjust its stance on so-called anti-semitism: while violence against jews as any other human beings should be countered, criticism of jews shall not be silenced by means of the United States government policies. Thus, the United States shall assist jewish organizations and individuals solely in the situations where life and freedom of the jews is in danger, and shall not prevent individuals, organizations, people and states from criticizing the jews, Israel or the so-called holocaust, shall not prevent peoples or states from asking the jews to voluntarily repatriate from a particular state to Israel or a third country. Instead, the United States of America shall concentrate on promotion of the derivative-natural rights to absolute freedom of speech, freedom of peaceful assembly and association, freedom of Christian religion, freedom of conscience, the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms of citizens and residents of a state throughout the world as a realistic means to reduce armed conflicts and civil strife.
A good example of the appropriate US policy towards extremism is the bequest of Robert McCorkell towards the US civil association, ‘the national alliance’, improperly classified as a terrorist organization by the FBI, which the jewish thieves residing in Canada try to steal with the assistance of crooked lawyers. The United States of America shall exercise appropriate pressure upon the Canadian government to see the bequested estate swiftly transferred to the US civil association, ‘the national alliance’, in accordance with its unconditional duty to protect the interests of US citizens, in particular, movable physical property of US citizens that has objective intrinsic and market value abroad, even if such interests are in conflict with foreign laws prohibiting or criminalizing the conduct political or non-criminal in nature as well as to permit the remains of Mr. Robert McCorkell, who voiced many objections with regard to the policies of the Canadian government, to be transferred and buried in the United States of America, in accordance with his will.

Another good example of the appropriate US policy towards extremism is the recurring problem of the library of Russia-born rabbi Shneerson, confiscated by communist thieves after the Bolshevik revolution, of which the zionist extremist group, chabad, claims ownership. The members of chabad committed intentional murders and rapes of children of both sexes below 12 years of age, and against the members of chabad many criminal cases were opened in a number of foreign states, including those resulting in convictions and supported by objective and compelling physical evidence proving beyond reasonable doubt that the members of chabad engaged in ritual sacrifice of Christian children in satanic cabbalistic rituals involving addition of Christian blood to jewish bread. It is difficult to imagine what can be learned out of the talmudic scripts that advise their believers to kill the best non-jews and to corrupt the best non-jewesses. Yet such talmudic scripts are physical objects that are reportedly sold in the market for thousands of US dollars. Therefore the government of the United States should request the Russian dictatorship to return the library of Russia-born rabbi Shneerson to chabad, protecting the movable physical property of US citizens that has objective market value.

It is obvious that the FBI should be thoroughly cleared of those who hold in contempt the constitutionally-protected rights of American citizens, even if worthless and repugnant ones, as long as such committed no abominable deeds of sexual perversions (homosexuality, lesbianism, bestiality, incest, pedophilia (sexual relations with girls below 12 years of age)), abominations (child murders (abortions), change of gender, cannibalism, human cloning), intentional murder, enslavement of men/women or selling of men/women to slavery.

Fourth, the closure of the US military torture and detention center in Guantanamo is long overdue. Osama bin Laden is dead, and the cause for the so-called war on terrorism no longer exists. Hence, the persons detained in Guantanamo should either be tried in US military courts if they committed war crimes and genocide, otherwise released either to their nations, or if there is a credible risk of torture, to safe third countries willing to take such persons. In a year, the US military torture and detention center in Guantanamo should be closed down and never re-opened.

Fifth, fatal drone attacks shall be authorized solely outside the United States, with regard to terrorists and militants who personally committed the abominable deeds of sexual perversions (homosexuality, lesbianism, bestiality, incest, pedophilia (sexual relations with girls below 12 years of age)), abominations (child murders (abortions), change of gender, cannibalism, human cloning), intentional murder, enslavement of men/women or selling of men/women to slavery, if such cannot be captured, by the secretary of defense in association with the director of the CIA in accordance with due process of law proper in such cases. No drone attack shall be authorized with regards to Christian priests and bishops, unless such commit the abominable deeds of sexual perversions (homosexuality, lesbianism, bestiality, incest, pedophilia (sexual relations with girls below 12 years of age)), abominations (child murders (abortions), change of gender, cannibalism, human cloning), intentional murder, enslavement of men/women or selling of men/women to slavery. While executing a drone attack, reasonable care should be exercised to avoid the killing of civilians, in particular women and children below 12 years of age.

Sixth, collection of financial information by US federal agencies shall be permitted solely subject to a court order issued upon a probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and describing in particular the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized - that is, with regard to particular persons and places for federal felony investigations by the FBI or foreign intelligence purposes by the NSA.

Another danger is the newly created US consumer financial protection bureau, which, under the pretense of protection of consumer rights, collects credit card information on consumer purchases and feeds the collected information into huge mathematical and statistical databases of the US economy in order to create consumer profiles and adjust the US economic policy to promote desirable and hinder undesirable consumption patterns, economically destroying US citizens it regards as undesirable in the process. This bureau should not be permitted to collect credit card information of US customers.

Seventh, exchange of personal information with foreign states shall be restricted solely to instances of criminal conduct, non-political in nature, recognized in the past and still recognized as criminal by civilized nations, and terrorist investigations. No exchange of personal information with foreign states shall take place with regard to extremists so defined, and no exchange of personal information with regard to militants shall take place, unless a militant group is proven by objective and compelling physical evidence beyond a reasonable doubt to be carrying terrorist attacks, yet even in such circumstances no exchange of personal information with China and Russia on militants shall have place, given the risks of misuse of personal information to target political dissenters.

It is important to restrict US defense and security cooperation with China and Russia to issues related to control and non-proliferation of nuclear, chemical and biological weapons of mass destruction, criminal conduct, non-political in nature, recognized in the past and still recognized as criminal by civilized nations, and terrorist investigations, and exercise care with regard to such US defense and security cooperation with China and Russia, given completely different approaches to security taken by China and Russia.

China is indeed a great and independent ancient nation, yet it views its citizens as servants or slaves of the Chinese state and assembles large databases of personal information to re-assign them wherever the Chinese state wishes. This approach to security may be appropriate for Chinese nation in accordance with the customs and traditions of Chinese statecraft, but is completely inappropriate to the United States, a free nation of free men and women that expects US citizens to be free and just judges of law and equity, able to objectively define Good and evil for themselves and those voluntarily subjecting themselves to their authority by thorough study of the commandments of Lord God Jehovah and Lord Jesus Christ, customs and traditions of American statecraft, natural rights, derivative-natural rights, civil rights and traditional rights of American citizens and residents.

As for Russia, it is presently the last European colonial empire, ruled by the Russian dictatorship, and hostile to the US national interests:

- that still prevents the islamic nations of Chechnya, Ingushetia, Dagestan, Karachay-Cherkessia, Kabardino-Balkaria, Adygea, Tatarstan, Bashkortostan, Kalmykia, Northern Ossetia and Mongolian nations of Tuva and Buryatia from obtaining freedom, sovereignty and independence, waging a brutal colonial war in the territory of those nations, and provoking terrorism that reached US shores with the Boston bombing;
- that seeks restoration of the soviet union through the so-called eurasian union by meddling in the internal affairs of Central Asian nations, supports the brutal Tajik and Uzbek dictatorships, and seeks to entrench its military presence in Central Asia through the collective security treaty organization;
- that so far refuses to return the historically non-Russian lands of the Kurili islands to Japan; Karelia, the territories of Finland that were a part of Finland according to the treaty of Tartu 1920 to Finland; the territories of Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia that were a part of Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia according to the treaty of Tartu 1920 to Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia; still prevents freedom, sovereignty and independence of so-called kaliningrad (Koenigsberg) region.
- that sends weapons and volunteers to Syria to support the bloody assad dictatorship;
- that refuses to conduct free elections or respect natural rights, derivative-natural rights, civil rights and traditional rights of Russian citizens and residents, in particular, the derivative-natural rights to absolute freedom of speech, freedom of peaceful assembly, freedom of Christian religion, freedom of conscience;
- that widely practices slavery and sexual slavery, including slavery of children of both sexes, terrorist attacks in foreign nations.

Therefore, Russia is a hostile nation and the main geopolitical enemy of the United States of America. It is of course possible that Russia will cease to be a colonial empire:

- will dissolve the eurasian union and collective security treaty organization and will end its meddling into internal affairs of islamic nations and sending of weapons and volunteers to islamic nations;
- will grant freedom, sovereignty and independence to the islamic nations of Chechnya, Ingushetia, Dagestan, Karachay-Cherkessia, Kabardino-Balkaria, Adygea, Tatarstan, Bashkortostan, Kalmykia, Northern Ossetia and Mongolian nations of Tuva and Buryatia;
- will return the historically non-Russian lands of the Kurili islands to Japan; Karelia, the territories of Finland that were a part of Finland according to the treaty of Tartu 1920 to Finland, the territories of Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia that were a part of Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia according to the treaty of Tartu 1920 to Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia; will re-estbalish the free, sovereign and independent great duchy of Koenigsberg under the scepter of George Michael Romanov-Gogenzollern of the House of Romanov;
- will conduct free elections and fully respect natural rights, derivative-natural rights, civil rights and traditional rights of Russian citizens and residents, in particular, the derivative-natural rights to absolute freedom of speech, freedom of peaceful assembly, freedom of Christian religion, freedom of conscience;
- will cease practicing slavery and sexual slavery, including slavery of children of both sexes and terrorist attacks in foreign nations, release all slaves, and punish those guilty of practicing slavery and sexual slavery and carrying out terrorist attacks in foreign nations,

ceasing to be a threat to US interests, and becoming a nation state of the Russian people and a great regional power it has always been, compensating for the above-mentioned territorial transfers with 1/3 of the Arctic it is entitled to. At present, however, Russia as any other colonial empire, seeks wars and subjugation of foreign nations, again becoming a threat to the world peace, and the US shall act accordingly with regard to Russia. If necessary, a US law shall be drafted and passed by the US Congress, restricting defense and security cooperation with China and Russia to issues related to control and non-proliferation of nuclear, chemical and biological weapons of mass destruction, criminal conduct, non-political in nature, recognized in the past and still recognized as criminal by civilized nations, and terrorist investigations.
fdtwain is offline  
Old April 17th, 2016, 11:23 AM   #17
Banned
 
fdtwain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Europe
Posts: 618
Eighth, so-called cyber threats and new threats shall be ignored by the NSA, the CIA and the FBI. These non-existent so-called cyber threats, invented by parasitic bureaucrats to justify their existence, can be addressed by the private sector, reasonable IT security measures and state civil laws. Nor is the so-called theft of US intellectual property important: in fact, US patent service was too liberal in approving patents, and US patenting protection shall be limited to inventions of physical objects or physical devices that can be realized in an industrial model, for the term of seven years, renewable for another seven years. Similarly, US copyright protection should be limited to trade marks and shall not in any wise be granted to obscene images and recordings, depicting sexual intercourse with joined sexual organs of men and women. The US law enforcement and national defense services should concentrate on protection of the rights of inventors of physical objects or physical devices that can be realized in an industrial model for the term of no more than 14 years from the patenting date and corporate trade marks: all other copyright and patenting protection shall be advanced by trade associations.

Ninth, the US foreign intelligence court should take great care not to become star chambers, and to approve solely such surveillance as warranted by a probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and describing in particular the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized - that is, with regard to particular persons and places for federal felony investigations by the FBI or foreign intelligence purposes by the NSA.

Furthermore, the US foreign intelligence court shall compile an annual report to the US congressional intelligence committee, describing its activities for the year. Next the provision of the NDAA permitting indefinite detention of US citizens should be repealed. US citizens inside the United States are subject to the jurisdiction of federal courts, while US citizens overseas, if detained, should be transferred to the jurisdiction of US federal courts or US military courts within 13 months after detention.

Tenth, the United States of America needs to gain control of its border with Mexico, constructing the automated border protection system and placing the US national guard on the US-Mexico border if necessary. Furthermore, all legal immigrants who committed felonies and illegal immigrants, except for those immigrants who married US citizens and produced children in marriage, should be repatriated to their native lands or safe third countries, if their life and freedom are in danger in their native lands because of their political or religious activities. Attempts to pass amnesty for illegal migrants, except for those immigrants who married US citizens and produced children in marriage, shall not be undertaken: amnesty will only encourage more illegal immigrants to come to the United States of America, and already tens of millions of US citizens willing to work are unemployed. Furthermore, the program of voluntary repatriation of US citizens of non-European descent to their native lands shall be established within the United States of America.

Yet the main cause of the present insecurity in America is a false approach to the issue, replacing freedom, economic growth and safety, attainable for (wo)men, with peace, stability and security, unattainable for (wo)men. Hence restoration of freedom, economic growth and safety should begin with abolishment of the department of homeland security that has no constitutional place in the US government. Otherwise, the Americans will learn the hard way that those who give up freedom for security deserve neither and achieve none.

The United States of America needs to review its laws to secure the blessings of liberty to US citizens, in particular:

The derivative-natural rights to absolute freedom of speech, written and spoken words, freedom of peaceful assembly and association, freedom of Christian religion, shall be recognized as part of dignity of man and all federal and state laws inconsistent with these derivative-natural rights repealed.

It is important that freedom of speech, spoken and written words, be absolute in the United States of America. Very characteristic is the case of three persons, who created web-site RevolutionMuslim.com advocating jihad as part of islamic religion, and were unlawfully and groundlessly sentenced to years of imprisonment for advocacy of their religious beliefs: the first amendment to the US constitution protects even calls to violence, in particular as part of religious advocacy, and US citizens cannot give up their constitutional rights even by voluntary confession of guilt. Therefore, despite voluntary confessions of guilt of the three persons, it is important for their lawyers to appeal the sentence, and for US federal courts to reverse conviction and set free these three persons, administering web-site RevolutionMuslim.com.

The derivative-natural rights to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms of US citizens, shall be recognized with regard to the following personal weapons: knives, handguns, semi-automatic and automatic weapons, machine guns, portable grenade launchers, portable rocket launchers, portable anti-aircraft missiles, portable anti-tank missiles, portable naval missiles, appropriate munitions and explosives, light military vehicles and warboats.

With regard to restrictions, registration with the governments of US states can be required with regard to portable grenade launchers, portable rocket launchers, portable anti-aircraft missiles, portable anti-tank missiles, portable naval missiles, and certain high powered explosives. With regard to all other personal weapons, including automatic weapons and machine guns, no restrictions are constitutionally permissible, and any registration requirements are constitutionally prohibited, and shall be repealed. Similarly, the United States cannot prohibit convicted felons and the criminally insane persons who committed felonies from keeping and bearing arms if it recognizes such persons as citizens of the United States. The United States can and should, however, withdraw citizenship rights from convicted felons and criminally insane persons, who committed felonies on US soil, in accordance with the judgments of US courts: such persons should lose their US citizenship rights if convicted of a felony in trial by jury, which has always been the US government policy in the past. Similarly, the US government can require gun manufacturers to provide to customers a firearm safety course as a part of purchase: the NRA administers many such firearm safety courses across the United States.

The civil right of US citizens to organize, train and arm self-defense militias of the American people shall be recognized, such self-defense militias encouraged to become part of the national guard of US states, and lawful independent self-defense militias not harassed by US district and state governments or the US federal government.

Appropriate US state and federal laws shall be passed to prohibit forceful imposition of electronic numbers for taxpayers and social security identification, forceful imposition of any marks, numbers, writings, microchips upon human skin or inside human body for any reason, forceful collection and storage of biometric information as fingerprints, eye scan, DNA-samples, without a written court order supported by clear and compelling evidence sufficient to accuse of felony a person from whom biometric evidence is collected in the territory of the United States. US citizens shall be given an option to be accounted for tax and social security purposes under their names, birthdates, places of birth and digital photographs, which are sufficient. Furthermore, prosecution of those who wound and kill the persons who forcefully impose any marks, numbers, writings, microchips upon human skin or inside human body for any reason shall be prohibited in the territory of the United States of America.

It is important for the republican party of America to repeal the US civil rights act of 1964 and all federal anti-discrimination laws: anti-discrimination policy pertains to US states.

The American people should remain moral if American freedom is to be preserved, therefore:
A death penalty in all cases shall be established and imposed upon the doers of the abominable deeds of sexual perversions (homosexuality, lesbianism, bestiality, incest, pedophilia (sexual relations with girls below 12 years of age)), abominations (child murders (abortions), change of gender, cannibalism, human cloning), intentional murder, enslavement of men/women or selling of men/women to slavery in the territory of the United States of America. Furthermore, prosecution of those who take property, wound and kill the doers of the abominable deeds of sexual perversions (homosexuality, lesbianism, bestiality, incest, pedophilia (sexual relations with girls below 12 years of age)), abominations (child murders (abortions), change of gender, cannibalism, human cloning), intentional murder, enslavement of men/women or selling of men/women to slavery shall be prohibited in the territory of the United States of America.

Prostitution and production of pornography for sale shall be outlawed in the territory of the United States of America by appropriate state laws.

Finally, one year mandatory counseling should be established by appropriate state laws before divorce is granted.

Morality is grounded upon Christian religion, and the United States of America is a Christian country, therefore it is also important for American Christian churches to remove from membership all doers of the abominable deeds of sexual perversions (homosexuality, lesbianism, bestiality, incest, pedophilia (sexual relations with girls below 12 years of age)), abominations (child murders (abortions), change of gender, cannibalism, human cloning), intentional murder, enslavement of men/women or selling of men/women to slavery, and all first time adulterers and adulteresses, not forgiven by their husbands or wives, and all repeated adulterers and adulteresses, including those who divorced a wife, except for the cause of adultery, and married another wife, and those who married divorced women, except for divorces obtained for the cause of adultery of their husbands, and require confession of faith in Lord God Jehovah, Lord Jesus Christ, Holy Spirit as the condition for membership in a Christian church: Lord Jesus Christ did not die for a single dog, hog or goat.

It is also clear that marriage is between one man and one woman, normally for lifetime, and there is no such thing as so-called “marriage” or union of sexual perverts. Therefore, the will of the US citizens who outlaw homosexual marriages in their respective states shall be respected by US federal and state courts.

The United Nations organization is in dire need of reform, therefore:

- a great regional power of India shall be admitted to permanent membership within the UN security council;
- the mission of the UN shall be limited to limitation of nuclear weapons, prohibition of storage and production of chemical weapons of mass destruction and destruction of chemical and biological weapons of mass destruction, stopping genocide and aggressive war by appropriate measures;
- various UN bodies not connected to the above-mentioned limited mission of the UN as unesco, unicef, etc., shall be either dissolved or transferred into separate international organizations independent from the UN.

Highly important is the principled US stand towards the United Nations organization: the UN is an international organization of independent and sovereign states, not a world government in the making, and not a god or gods, and the UN shall tolerate and respect the existence of individuals, organizations, peoples, nations, states and international organizations that reject its values, voluntarily refuse to participate in its activities even if such individuals, organizations, peoples, nations, states and international organizations undertake the policies contrary to the goals and purposes of the United Nations, as long as such individuals, organizations, peoples, nations, states and international organizations do not engage in aggressive war or genocide. Therefore, the United States of America shall politely request so that the UN remove from its charter and international treaties all provisions inconsistent with the derivative-natural rights to absolute freedom of speech, freedom of peaceful assembly and association, freedom of Christian religion, freedom of conscience, the derivative-natural right of citizens and residents of a state to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms, and focus its policies upon its original mission of suppression of aggressive war and genocide, limitation of nuclear weapons, and worldwide prohibition and destruction of chemical and biological weapons, and shall develop and deposit with the UN appropriate reservations with regard to the UN charter and treaties, protecting the constitutionally protected rights of American citizens and residents. Furthermore, the republican party of America shall ask the UN to relocate its headquarters from New York to Geneva, Switzerland, as Switzerland is a neutral country, appropriate for hosting the UN headquarters, in which all nations of the world, despite any hostilities among them, may seek peaceful resolution of their disputes whenever possible.

Such a UN reform does not turn the UN into the League of Nations, which was powerless to stop genocide and aggressive war, but limits UN jurisdiction to matters of genuine international concern wherein swift international action is required with appropriate mechanisms to enforce UN decisions, while denying the UN means to overextend its mission and transfer itself into a world government.

Republican, conservative, nationalist, patriotic and fundamentalist US citizens shall record all violations of US federal and state laws by the obama administration, shall report them to US citizens and shall prosecute all US officials responsible in US federal and state courts to the fullest extent of US laws, rejecting any compromises and forcing final judgment to be rendered by US courts. Furthermore, republican, conservative, nationalist, patriotic and fundamentalist US citizens shall record all violations of US federal and state laws and all violations of US citizens and residents by zionist criminal organization adl and democratic criminal organization splc, shall report them to US citizens and shall prosecute all adl and splc employees responsible and those US officials cooperating with them, in US federal and state courts to the fullest extent of US laws, rejecting any compromise and forcing final judgment to be rendered by US courts. Finally, in all US district, state and federal elections firm, consistent and uncompromising republican, conservative, nationalist, patriotic and fundamentalist candidates shall be nominated by the republican party of the United States of America to fight in political struggle against zionist, masonic, democratic, communist, socialist and colored candidates nominated by the US democratic party to give the Americans a real political choice to make in free district, state and federal elections.

The United States of America indeed lives through perilous times, but American freedom can be preserved by swift, consistent and firm action by republican, conservative, nationalist, patriotic and fundamentalist US citizens against zionists, masons, democrats, communists, socialists, coloreds, who are attacking American freedom. Yet America is a truly great and exceptional Christian nation and can preserve American freedom, remaining a shining city of freedom upon the hill of justice, illuminating the way to prosperity for the nations of the world.
fdtwain is offline  
Old April 17th, 2016, 09:47 PM   #18
Banned
 
fdtwain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Europe
Posts: 618
Dealing with militants

Recently, a US federal judge made an unlawful, groundless and unconstitutional ruling with regard to the Libyan citizen Abu Anas Al Libi.

The Libyan citizen Abu Anas Al Libi is a long term Libyan freedom fighter and an enemy of the gaddafi dictatorship, who became associated with Al-Qaeda. He lived in Afghanistan prior to the US aggressive war against Afghanistan began, and subsequently fled to Iran, wherein he was imprisoned for a decade. Subsequently, the Libyan citizen Abu Anas Al Libi returned to the liberated Libya, wherein he organized, trained and armed a self-defense militia of the Libyan people.

In October 2013 Abu Anas Al Libi was kidnapped by US special forces and transported to the US ship, in which he was debrief, and, according to Abu Anas Al Libi, allegedly tortured and inhumanely treated before he was delivered to the custody of the US federal court on terrorism-related charges.

In addressing the issue whether the US federal court has jurisdiction over Abu Anas Al Libi case, it is important first and foremost to state that Abu Anas Al Libi is neither a citizen of the United States nor a permanent resident of the United States, nor a lawful temporary resident of the United States, having been brought to the United States essentially as a slave, kidnapped by US special forces against his will. Therefore, the United States of America cannot reasonably expect the Libyan citizen Abu Anas Al Libi to abide by the constitution and laws of the United States of America, to which the Libyan citizen Abu Anas Al Libi has never freely consented, nor been born out of a US citizen or on US soil to be able to understand the constitution and laws of the United States. Furthermore, charges against Libyan citizen Abu Anas Al Libi concern the alleged actions taken outside the territory of the United States of America.

Nor does the principle of universal jurisdiction apply to the case of the Libyan citizen Abu Anas Al Libi. Abu Anas Al Libi is not alleged to have committed the abominable deeds of sexual perversions (homosexuality, lesbianism, bestiality, incest, pedophilia (sexual relations with girls below 12 years of age)), abominations (child murders (abortions), change of gender, cannibalism, human cloning), intentional murder, enslavement of men/women or selling of men/women to slavery.

Nor is the Libyan citizen Abu Anas Al Libi a terrorist, having not attacked civilian targets without objective reasons as foreign Al-Qaeda terrorists that attacked the US world trade center or a domestic terrorist as elliot rogers. Abu Anas Al Libi is alleged to have assisted in planning Al-Qaeda attacks on US embassies in Kenya and Tanzania, but both could be construed as legitimate military targets, given the presence of US military attaches that are involved in so-called anti-terrorist operations. The US federal judge refers to the alleged assistance Abu Anas Al Libi rendered to planning the attacks against USAID office in Kenya, but Al-Qaeda long objects to financing of child-murder (abortions) done by USAID, as a child-murder (abortions) is a capital crime punished by a death sentence under the commandment of God (Leviticus 20:2-3, Exodus 21:22-25) and sharia law, hence USAID office in Kenya may be construed as a legitimate military target as well, which is a reason for providing abortion funding by the US government in foreign nations, if undertaken at all, through a separate agency.

Nor does the character of participation of the Libyan citizen Abu Anas Al Libi in Al-Qaeda operations raise to the level justifying the application of universal jurisdiction by the US federal court: Abu Anas Al Libi neither participated personally with arms in attacks upon civilian targets or US targets abroad, nor provided weapons or funding for armed attacks upon civilian targets or US targets abroad. Mere participation in and assistance to terrorist groups, other than personal participation with arms, or provision of weapons to, or funding for armed attacks upon civilian targets or US targets abroad is not sufficient to invoke the principle of universal jurisdiction by US federal courts against foreign citizens, kidnap or kill foreign citizens.

Furthermore, Al-Qaeda is not a hierarchical organization, but an alliance consisting of terrorists that attack civilian targets for no objective reasons, who need to be pursued, captured or killed, and national liberation movements and islamic liberation movements as Taleban, al-Shabab, Ansar-Al-Sharia, Jabhat-Al-Nusra, that fight for freedom of righteous muslims to live under God and the laws of God and separate from the doers of the abominable deeds of sexual perversions (homosexuality, lesbianism, bestiality, incest, pedophilia (sexual relations with girls below 12 years of age)), abominations (child murders (abortions), change of gender, cannibalism, human cloning), intentional murder, enslavement of men/women or selling of men/women to slavery, often having legitimate grievances, that shall be resolved through peaceful negotiations wherever possible. The Libyan citizen Abu Anas Al Libi is a member of a Libyan islamic fighting group, which is national liberation movement and islamic liberation movement of righteous Libyan citizens.

Finally, it is important to determine whether the warfare in which the Libyan citizen Abu Anas Al Libi was involved in was legitimate or not. The holy war (jihad) is part of islamic faith and is legitimate defensive warfare if waged in the territory of islamic nations with population largely adhering to islamic faith and sharia law. In contrast, in western nations and non-islamic nations in general, the holy war (jihad) is generally illegitimate aggressive warfare unless genocide takes place in the territory of a non-islamic nation, or an allied non-islamic nation asks an islamic nation to come to its defense against foreign aggression. The Libyan citizen Abu Anas Al Libi is not alleged to engage in attacks in the territory of the United States or the territory of western nations, but in the territory of Kenya and Tanzania. In Tanzania 65% of the population are muslims, while Kenya carries out extensive military operations in islamic nations, that are characterized as aggressive wars by the majority of the islamic population of those nations. Therefore, the Libyan citizen Abu Anas Al Libi can reasonably be presumed, in accordance with the norms of his religion, islamic faith and sharia law, by a reasonable man to engage in defensive holy war (jihad) against foreign invaders in the US embassy in Kenya and Tanzania, that plan and carry so-called anti-terrorists operations against muslims, and against USAID office that funds genocide of unborn muslim chidren in islamic nations through child murder (abortions), which is unsurprisingly what Al-Qaeda propaganda alleges. Thus, the Libyan citizen Abu Anas Al Libi is a lawful militant (military combatant) to whom both the convention against torture and the Geneva conventions relative to treatment of prisoners of war apply, and an adversary of the United States of America, opposed to the purposes of US foreign policy, who in his appeal desires to be adjudicated under international law, rejecting the jurisdiction of US civil courts based on the US constitution and laws.

The world is populated by many different peoples, having strikingly different religions, customs, traditions, values, and ways of life, some of which may be incomprehensible for Americans: what is good for foreigners in their foreign states, may be evil in the eyes of Americans and vice versa. And while some deeds, the abominable deeds of sexual perversions (homosexuality, lesbianism, bestiality, incest, pedophilia (sexual relations with girls below 12 years of age)), abominations (child murders (abortions), change of gender, cannibalism, human cloning), intentional murder, enslavement of men/women or selling of men/women to slavery, genocide, aggressive war are evil in themselves, other deeds may be presumed to be evil or good, depending upon wherein they take place. The United States of America as any other nation of the world cannot kidnap a foreign citizen on foreign soil, torture and inhumanly treat him, and subsequently try him under the US constitution and laws, simply because he is a lawful militant and an adversary of the United States of America, opposed to the purposes of US foreign policy: history is ripe with the examples of nations and international organizations that committed such oppressive acts only to have all other nations to unite against such nations and international organizations and bring them down, restoring international order. Therefore, the US federal court has no jurisdiction over the case of the Libyan citizen Abu Anas Al Libi, and the US appellate court or the US Supreme court shall reverse the unlawful, groundless and unconstitutional ruling of the US federal judge, recognizing that US civil courts have no jurisdiction over the Libyan citizen Abu Anas Al Libi, who is neither a citizen, nor a lawful resident of United States of America, nor committed any crime in the territory of the United States of America to be subject to the jurisdiction of US federal courts, nor subject to universal jurisdiction of US federal courts, being essentially unlawfully imported to the territory of the United States as a slave in violation of US constitutional prohibition on slavery in general and importation of slaves in particular, and, since the Libyan citizen Abu Anas Al Libi is a lawful military combatant, refer his case to US military courts to be adjudicated under US and international military law.

US military courts shall determine:

- whether customs and traditions of lawful warfare under US and international military law were observed during Al-Qaeda attacks upon US embassies in Kenya and Tanzania and USAID office in Kenya, taking into account the customs of Libyan warfare of that time, according to which the gaddafi dictatorship engaged in the campaign of assassinations on foreign diplomatic missions in which military attaches were present;
- whether the Libyan citizen Abu Anas Al Libi participated with arms, or supplied arms, or gave funding to Al-Qaeda attacks upon US embassies in Kenya and Tanzania and USAID office in Kenya;
- whether the requirements of the UN Convention against torture and the Geneva conventions relative to treatment of prisoners of war were violated with regard to the Libyan citizen Abu Anas Al Libi during his internment on the US warship.

Subsequently, US military courts shall appoint appropriate punishment under US and international military law if the Libyan citizen Abu Anas Al Libi is found to have participated with arms, or supplied arms, or gave funding to Al-Qaeda attacks upon US embassies in Kenya and Tanzania and USAID office in Kenya, and Al-Qaeda attacks upon US embassies in Kenya and Tanzania and USAID office in Kenya are found to have violated US and international military law interpreted in accordance with the customs of Libyan warfare of that time. Furthermore, US military courts shall determine just compensation to be paid to Abu Anas Al Libi if the requirements of the UN Convention against torture and the Geneva conventions relative to treatment of prisoners of war were violated with regard to the Libyan citizen Abu Anas Al Libi during his internment on the US warship.

Furthermore, US military courts shall determine whether the Libyan citizen Abu Anas Al Libi is still engaging in hostilities against the United States of America, and if so, whether the Libyan citizen Abu Anas Al Libi shall be detained for the period not exceeding seven years as a lawful military combatant under internment in the United States of America, observing the requirements of the UN Convention against torture and the Geneva conventions relative to treatment of prisoners of war during his detention.

The Libyan state may have prosecuted Libyan citizen Abu Anas Al Libi, yet the gaddafi dictatorship extended amnesty to the Libyan citizen Abu Anas Al Libi, that the Libyan state cannot reverse: reportedly, the Libyan citizen Abu Anas Al Libi disassociated himself from Al-Qaeda and engaged in organization, training and arming a self-defense militia of the Libyan people, prior to his kidnapping by US special forces. Therefore, judging by the evidence presented in the trial of the Libyan citizen Abu Anas Al Libi, the kidnapping of Abu Anas Al Libi by US special forces should have never taken place, and the proper course of dealing with the Libyan citizen Abu Anas Al Libi after the completion of the above-mentioned proceedings before US military courts is to purchase the Libyan citizen Abu Anas Al Libi a ticket to Libya and to wish Abu Anas Al Libi a safe journey back to Libya.

The example of the Libyan citizen Abu Anas Al Libi demonstrates how militants shall be dealt with. In particular, use of US drones and US special forces to capture or kill US and foreign citizens on foreign soil shall be strictly limited to active participants of foreign terrorist and militant organizations that attacked US citizens, US civilian or US military targets within the United States of America or in foreign nations, who either committed the abominable deeds of sexual perversions (homosexuality, lesbianism, bestiality, incest, pedophilia (sexual relations with girls below 12 years of age)), abominations (child murders (abortions), change of gender, cannibalism, human cloning), intentional murder, enslavement of men/women or selling of men/women to slavery, or participated with arms in such attacks, or supplied arms to such attacks, or gave funding to such attacks, not to abuse this part of war powers of the US Congress, given that murder and kidnapping of a man are in itself capital crimes punished by a death sentence (Exodus 21:14, Exodus 21:16), that provoke hostility and resentment towards the United States of America, so-called blowback. Furthermore, militants shall be engaged in peaceful negotiations to resolve the legitimate grievances militants often have. Additionally, militant organizations that do not attack US citizens, US civilian or US military targets within the United States of America or in foreign nations, shall not be attacked by US drones and US special forces in their foreign nations, even if they are adversaries to the United States of America and opposed to the purposes of US foreign policy: international relations is the arena for competition for many state and non-state actors, some of which rise and some of which fall, as the tree of life branches and re-branches, and conquest and domination of foreign peoples and nations in their territory cannot be a legitimate goal of any nation, being rightfully condemned as fascism after the end of the second world war. Finally, use of US drones and US special forces to capture or kill foreign citizens on foreign soil, being a part of power to issue letters of marque and reprisal under article I section 8 of the US constitution, reserved to the US Congress, requires documentation of each individual case, including approval of use of US drones and US special forces to capture or kill US and foreign citizens on foreign soil by the US secretary of justice and the US secretary of defense in each individual case, and approval of a foreign state in the territory of which US drones and US special forces are to be used, wherever feasible and reasonable, thorough planning to minimize civilian casualties, and periodic reports to the defense committee of the US house of representatives and the US senate with regard to the number of US and foreign citizens captured or killed on foreign soil by US drones and US special forces.

Finally, it is important not to unduly engage in sectarian considerations with regard to islamic faith and sharia law, as questions of legality or illegality of particular actions of muslims can generally be adjudicated by secular legislation in secular courts. Reportedly, a US policeman, captain Paul Fields, was ordered by Tulsa police officials to go to a religious event in a local mosque essentially to listen to islamic proselytizing, which is a prohibited religious test outlawed in article VI of the US constitution as violation of the derivative-natural right to freedom of Christian religion, and the derivative-natural right to freedom of conscience of US citizens and residents, guaranteed by the first amendment to the US constitution. It is important to distinguish between visitation of religious events to carry out police duties, and enforced religious proselytizing to obtain a captive audience, which is outlawed in article VI of the US constitution. Captain Paul Fields shall appeal the ruling of the US federal court that unlawfully, groundlessly and unconstitutionally affirmed an order by Tulsa police officials to go to a religious event in a local mosque essentially to listen to islamic proselytizing, and the US appellate and the US supreme court shall reverse the ruling of the US federal court, respecting the derivative-natural right to freedom of Christian religion, and the derivative-natural right to freedom of conscience of US citizens and residents confirmed in article VI of the US constitution and the first amendment to the US constitution.
fdtwain is offline  
Old April 17th, 2016, 09:48 PM   #19
Banned
 
fdtwain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Europe
Posts: 618
Nullification in America

Nullification is gaining ground across the United States of America. Yet only a few US citizens understand what nullification is and why it is a lawful exercise of powers vested in US states, districts and citizens by the constitution of the United States of America.

Nullification - an act of nullifying or rendering without legal effect a law, either made without legitimate and lawful authority, or contrary to the commandments of Lord God Jehovah and Lord Jesus Christ, customs and traditions of the state-forming people, natural rights, autonomy, self-government, rights and authority of provinces, districts and tribes, natural rights, derivative-natural rights, civil rights and traditional rights of citizens and residents of the state - by a provincial or district legislature, a jury of citizens of the state or an individual citizen of the state, has its origin in Christianity as well as in Greek, Roman and American history.

Lord Jesus Christ said:

Matthew:18:18
Verily I say unto you, Whatsoever ye shall bind on earth shall be bound in heaven: and whatsoever ye shall loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven

giving a pastor of a Christian church, who is a bishop of Lord Jesus Christ, and the council of pastors of Christian churches, who are bishops of Lord Jesus Christ, the keys to the kingdom of heaven - the authority to truthfully, mercifully and justly interpret the commandments of Lord God Jehovah and Lord Jesus Christ, except for the Word of God contained in the Book of Revelation of John, for a particular country till the Second Coming of Lord Jesus Christ.

In fact, Lord Jesus Christ was also the great nullifier of the Mosaic Law, nullifying the whole commandments of the Mosaic Law, i.e. with regard to the letter of divorce.

Nullification was known and widely practiced in ancient Greece, wherein juries had power over both the law and the facts of the case and wherein the legislatures and the assemblies of Greek colonies were free to nullify the laws of Athens and other Greek metropolises not suited to their conditions. Interestingly, the great Athenian republican statesman Solon the lawgiver approved of nullification and was himself the great nullifier of Athenian laws, passing the Solon law that abolished the debt slavery and nullified many Athenian loan contracts, that brought freedom, justice and prosperity to Athens, swiftly making it the richest city-state of Greece, with wide league of allies among the Greek city-states. In contrast, the democratic politician Pericles disapproved of nullification and attempted to impose Athenian laws on other Greek city-states and govern other Greek city-states directly, which led to civil war in Greece, dissolution of the Athenian league of city-states and drastic weakening of all Greek city-states.

Nullification was known and widely practiced in ancient Roman Republic, wherein Roman magistrates had power over both the law and the facts of the case, the legislatures and the assemblies of Roman colonies were free to nullify the Roman laws not suited to their conditions, while Roman magistrates were free to nullify local laws not suited to Romans living under Roman laws in Roman colonies. In contrast, Roman emperors disapproved of nullification and attempted to impose Roman laws on Roman colonies and govern Roman colonies directly, provoking periodic rebellions which were one of the main reasons of the downfall of the Roman empire. Subsequently, nullification was widely practiced by the colonies of Italian city-states.

Nullification was known and widely practiced in colonial America, wherein juries had power over both the law and the facts of the case and the legislatures and the assemblies of American colonies regularly nullified British laws in the territory of their colonies.

Furthermore, nullification was established as a legitimate instrument of protection of state sovereignty and state rights after the establishment of the United States of America and ratification of the constitution of the United States of America. Nullification is based upon the correct constitutional compact theory, truthfully presenting the constitution of the United States of America as the compact between the US states and the peoples of the US states, delegating only well-defined properly interpreted limited enumerated powers to the federal government of the United States of America. The legal theory of nullification was initially developed by the US presidents Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, who developed the act of nullification as the necessary instrument for preservation of both American freedom and the union of American states.

The legal theory of nullification establishes:

- the right of a legislature of a US state in a free, direct and secret vote of 2/3 of deputies and councilors of both of its houses to issue a resolution proclaiming to be without legal effect a US federal law, which in its judgment is not in accordance with the enumerated powers vested in the US congress under article 1 of the constitution of the United States, or contrary the provisions of the constitution of the United States, or contrary to the constitutional rights of US citizens and residents, enumerated in the constitution of the United States or in the amendments thereto, to prohibit state officials, representatives and statesmen from enforcement of such a US federal law in the territory of the state, and to absolve from legal responsibility all US citizens and residents residing in the territory of the state who refuse to comply with or resist a US federal law, not in accordance with the enumerated powers vested with the US Congress under article 1 section 8 of the constitution of the United States or contrary the provisions of the constitution of the United States or contrary to the constitutional rights of US citizens and residents, enumerated in the constitution of the United States or in the amendments thereto;
- the right of a legislature of a US state in a free, direct and secret vote of 2/3 of deputies and councilors of both of its houses to issue a resolution proclaiming to be without legal effect an executive order of the US president, which in its judgment is not in accordance with the enumerated powers vested with the US president under article 2 of the constitution of the United States, or contrary to the provisions of the constitution of the United States, or contrary to the constitutional rights of US citizens and residents, enumerated in the constitution of the United States or in the amendments thereto, to prohibit state officials, representatives and statesmen from enforcement of such an executive order of the US president in the territory of the state, and to absolve from legal responsibility all US citizens and residents residing in the territory of the state who refuse to comply with or resist an executive order of the US president, not in accordance with the enumerated powers vested in the US president under article 2 of the constitution of the United States, or contrary to the provisions of the constitution of the United States, or contrary to the constitutional rights of US citizens and residents, enumerated in the constitution of the United States or in the amendments thereto;
- the right of a legislature of a US state in a free, direct and secret vote of 2/3 of deputies and councilors of both of its houses to issue a resolution proclaiming to be without legal effect a decision of a US federal court, which in its judgment is not in accordance with the enumerated powers vested in the US federal courts under article 3 of the constitution of the United States, or contrary the provisions of the constitution of the United States, or contrary to the constitutional rights of US citizens and residents, enumerated in the constitution of the United States or in the amendments thereto, to prohibit state officials, representatives and statesmen from enforcement of such a decision of a US federal court in the territory of the state, and to absolve from legal responsibility all US citizens and residents residing in the territory of the state who refuse to comply with or resist a decision of a US federal court, not in accordance with the enumerated powers vested with the US federal courts under article 3 of the constitution of the United States, or contrary the provisions of the constitution of the United States, or contrary to the constitutional rights of US citizens and residents, enumerated in the constitution of the United States or in the amendments thereto;
- the right of a legislature of a US district in a free, direct and secret vote of 2/3 of deputies to issue a resolution proclaiming to be without legal effect a US federal law, which in its judgment is not in accordance with the enumerated powers vested in the US Congress under article 1 of the constitution of the United States, or contrary the provisions of the constitution of the United States, or contrary to the constitutional rights of US citizens and residents, enumerated in the constitution of the United States or in the amendments thereto, to prohibit district officials, representatives and statesmen from enforcement of such a US federal law in the territory of the district, and to absolve from legal responsibility all US citizens and residents residing in the territory of the district who refuse to comply with or resist a US federal law, not in accordance with the enumerated powers vested with the US Congress under article 1 section 8 of the constitution of the United States, or contrary to the provisions of the constitution of the United States, or contrary to the constitutional rights of US citizens and residents, enumerated in the constitution of the United States or in the amendments thereto;
- the right of a legislature of a US district in a free, direct and secret vote of 2/3 of deputies to issue a resolution proclaiming to be without legal effect an executive order of the US president, which in its judgment is not in accordance with the enumerated powers vested with the US president under article 2 of the constitution of the United States, or contrary to the provisions of the constitution of the United States, or contrary to the constitutional rights of US citizens and residents, enumerated in the constitution of the United States or in the amendments thereto, to prohibit district officials, representatives and statesmen from enforcement of such an executive order of the US president in the territory of the district, and to absolve from legal responsibility all US citizens and residents residing in the territory of the district who refuse to comply with or resist an executive order of the US president, not in accordance with the enumerated powers vested in the US president under article 2 of the constitution of the United States, or contrary to the provisions of the constitution of the United States, or contrary to the constitutional rights of US citizens and residents, enumerated in the constitution of the United States or in the amendments thereto;
- the right of a legislature of a US district in a free, direct and secret vote of 2/3 of deputies to issue a resolution proclaiming to be without legal effect a decision of a US federal court, which in its judgment is not in accordance with the enumerated powers vested in US federal courts under article 3 of the constitution of the United States, or contrary to the provisions of the constitution of the United States, or contrary to the constitutional rights of US citizens and residents, enumerated in the constitution of the United States or in the amendments thereto, to prohibit district officials, representatives and statesmen from enforcement of such a decision of a US federal court in the territory of the district, and to absolve from legal responsibility all US citizens and residents residing in the territory of the district who refuse to comply with or resist a decision of a US federal court, not in accordance with the enumerated powers vested with US federal courts under article 3 of the constitution of the United States, or contrary the provisions of the constitution of the United States, or contrary to the constitutional rights of US citizens and residents, enumerated in the constitution of the United States or in the amendments thereto;
- the right of a legislature of a US district in a free, direct and secret vote of 2/3 of deputies to issue a resolution proclaiming to be without legal effect a US state law, which in its judgment is not in accordance with the enumerated powers vested in the state legislature under the state constitution, or contrary the provisions of the constitution of the state, or contrary to the constitutional rights of US citizens and residents, enumerated in the constitution of the United States and in the constitution of the state or in the amendments thereto, to prohibit district officials, representatives and statesmen from enforcement of such a US state law in the territory of the district, and to absolve from legal responsibility all US citizens and residents residing in the territory of the district who refuse to comply with or resist a US state law, not in accordance with the enumerated powers vested in the state legislature under the state constitution, or contrary to the provisions of the constitution of the state, or contrary to the constitutional rights of US citizens and residents, enumerated in the constitution of the United States and in the constitution of the state or in the amendments thereto;
- the right of a legislature of a US district in a free, direct and secret vote of 2/3 of deputies to issue a resolution proclaiming to be without legal effect an executive order of a US state governor, which in its judgment is not in accordance with the enumerated powers vested in the state governor under the state constitution, or contrary to the provisions of the constitution of the state, or contrary to the constitutional rights of US citizens and residents, enumerated in the constitution of the United States and in the constitution of the state or in the amendments thereto, to prohibit district officials, representatives and statesmen from enforcement of such an executive order of a US state governor in the territory of the district, and to absolve from legal responsibility all US citizens and residents residing in the territory of the district who refuse to comply with or resist an executive order of a US state governor, not in accordance with the enumerated powers vested in the US state governor under the state constitution, or contrary to the provisions of the constitution of the state, or contrary to the constitutional rights of US citizens and residents, enumerated in the constitution of the United States and in the constitution of the state or in the amendments thereto;
- the right of a legislature of a US district in a free, direct and secret vote of 2/3 of deputies to issue a resolution proclaiming to be without legal effect a decision of a US state court, which in its judgment is not in accordance with the enumerated powers vested in state courts under the state constitution, or contrary to the provisions of the constitution of the state, or contrary to the constitutional rights of US citizens and residents, enumerated in the constitution of the United States and in the constitution of the state or in the amendments thereto, to prohibit district officials, representatives and statesmen from enforcement of such a decision of a US state court in the territory of the district, and to absolve from legal responsibility all US citizens and residents residing in the territory of the district who refuse to comply with or resist a decision of a US state court, not in accordance with the enumerated powers vested in US state courts under the state constitution, or contrary to the provisions of the constitution of the state, or contrary to the constitutional rights of US citizens and residents, enumerated in the constitution of the United States and in the constitution of the state or in the amendments thereto;
- the power of juries in district, state and federal courts over both the law and the facts of the case;
- the right of US citizens to civil disobedience, that is not to comply with and resist any federal, state and district legislation, either made without legitimate and lawful authority, or contrary to the commandments of Lord God Jehovah and Lord Jesus Christ, customs and traditions of the American people and American statecraft, natural rights, autonomy, self-government, rights and authority of states, districts and tribes, natural rights, derivative-natural rights, civil rights and traditional rights of citizens and residents of the United States of America, bearing no legal responsibility for that;
- the right of priests of Lord God Jehovah, priests of Lord God Jehovah and Lord Jesus Christ, priests and bishops of Lord Jesus Christ, priests, bishops and pastors of Christian churches to absolve of legal and moral responsibility by remission of sins or appropriate animal sacrifices all US citizens who do not comply with and resist with arms any federal, state and district legislation, either made without legitimate and lawful authority, or contrary to the commandments of Lord God Jehovah and Lord Jesus Christ, customs and traditions of the American people and American statecraft, natural rights, autonomy, self-government, rights and authority of states, districts and tribes, natural rights, derivative-natural rights, civil rights and traditional rights of citizens and residents of the United States of America.

The legal theory of nullification correctly acknowledges that any US federal legislation issued not in accordance with the enumerated powers vested in the US federal government in the constitution of the United States, or contrary to the provisions of the constitution of the United States, or contrary to the constitutional rights of US citizens and residents, enumerated in the constitution of the United States or in the amendments thereto, is without legal effect from the date of adoption, is null and void, and shall not be enforced by US states and districts that, having original sovereignty over the territory of the United States of America and delegating only well-defined properly-interpreted limited enumerated powers to the US federal government, retain the right to declare US federal legislation unconstitutional. The legal theory of nullification rejects an incorrect notion of the US supreme court decision as ultimate and final in constitutional issues. Most importantly, the theory of nullification acknowledges that in order to preserve the union of US states, it is sometimes necessary for a particular US state or a US district to nullify an unconstitutional law in its territory to swiftly address well-founded grievances of US citizens and residents residing in its territory, rather than to go through a lengthy process before US federal courts that are naturally inclined to rule in favor of expansive interpretation of the authority of the US federal government.

Besides Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, the majority of American revolutionary statesmen approved of nullification - Benjamin Franklin, Patrick Henry, George Tucker, John Taylor among them. The US president George Washington warned however that nullification shall not be undertaken lightly or in trivial matters not to cause disunion among US states and districts.

Probably the best legal theorist of nullification as the instrument of protection of state sovereignty and state rights within the US federal system was the great US statesman John Calhoun, a vice-president of the United States of America, a fervent opponent of the centralized federal government, federal spending and protectionism. John Calhoun was a supporter of the federal union of US states and an opponent of secessionism, yet a supporter of nullification as the necessary price of preservation of American freedom and the federal union of US states. John Calhoun, while a supporter of slavery as a peculiar Southern institution, respected the right of Northern states not to permit slavery, and supported the repatriation of freed negro slaves back to Africa. Interestingly, many abolitionists referred to nullification and John Calhoun in support for successful nullification of fugitive slave laws in Northern states, and many negro slaves obtained their freedom in Northern states due to John Calhoun and nullification.

Two excellent examples of successful nullification of US federal laws by state legislatures involve first the Kentucky and the Virginia resolution that nullified the unconstitutional aliens and sedition act of the US congress, made in violation of the first amendment to the US constitution, that subsequently expired: in this case the nullified federal law contrary to the constitutional rights of US citizens was let to expire and was not renewed. The second example involves nullification of the federal tariff acts of 1828 and 1832 by the state of South Carolina in 1832, and subsequently the compromise tariff act of 1833 was passed by the US congress: in this case the federal law, with disproportionate severity affecting a particular US state was replaced with a reasonable compromise. These examples demonstrate, firstly, that there can be no compromise with regard to constitutional rights of US citizens and residents, as unconstitutional federal legislation made contrary to natural rights, derivative-natural rights, civil rights and traditional rights of citizens and residents of the United States of America, recognized in the US constitution, shall be nullified and repealed, and, secondly, that a reasonable compromise is possible with regard to federal legislation made with legitimate and lawful authority, yet that with disproportionate severity affects a particular US state or US states, as such federal legislation can be nullified and subsequently replaced with reasonable compromise legislation.

How should US federal courts respond to the state laws of US states nullifying US federal laws? In examining a state law nullifying a US federal law, a US federal court:

- shall examine whether a state law nullifying a US federal law is properly passed by the legislature of a US state;
- shall examine whether a nullified federal law is issued in accordance with the enumerated powers of the US congress listed in article 1 section 8 of the constitution of the United States of America;
- shall examine whether a nullified federal law is contrary to the constitutional rights of US citizens and residents, and if so, whether it is issued subject to objective and compelling interest of the US federal government and does not significantly burden the constitutional right of US citizens and residents;
- shall examine whether a nullified federal law violates any provisions of the US constitution.

If a state law nullifying a US federal law is properly passed and a nullified US federal law either is not issued in accordance with the enumerated powers of the US congress listed in article 1 section 8 of the constitution of the United States of America, or is issued contrary to the constitutional rights of US citizens and residents and not subject to an objective and compelling interest of the US federal government that does not significantly burden the constitutional right of US citizens and residents or violate any provisions of the US constitution, a US federal court shall either declare a nullified federal law unconstitutional and without legal effect or interpret the ninth and the tenth amendment to the US constitution so that to reject the legal challenge to a state law nullifying a US federal law, deferring to the wisdom of the state legislature that nullified a federal law in the territory of the state.

A good example of the successful nullification of a state law is the Kansas Second Amendment Protection Act that defends the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms of US citizens and residents, recognized and protected in the second amendment to the US constitution.

To prevent gun violence the US non-government organization Brady center filed a frivolous lawsuit in a US federal court, challenging the constitutionality of the Kansas Second Amendment Protection Act. First, Brady center has no legal standing to challenge the constitutionality of the Kansas Second Amendment Protection Act: Brady center is not an official of the federal government, prevented from enforcing of federal gun control legislation in the state of Kansas, that potentially has standing to file such a lawsuit. Second, as it has been demonstrated above, US state legislatures are empowered to declare unconstitutional a federal law subject to the legal theory of nullification in lawful exercise of their sovereignty, part of which was delegated to the US federal government in the form of well-defined, properly interpreted limited enumerated powers when the constitution of the United States of America was passed: nullification is neither a novel, nor an unconstitutional doctrine. Third, the US Supreme Court is neither an ultimate nor a final arbiter of constitutional questions: the decision of the US state referendum, passed in a free, direct and secret vote of 2/3 of US citizens residing in the US state at least one year is superior to any other legislation of the state. Furthermore, the fact that in 1958 an unwise and improper decision of the US Supreme Court of that time declared nullification of a US federal law by US state legislatures unconstitutional does not change the fact that at the foundation of the United States of America it was established otherwise and recognized by many US federal judges to be otherwise, as nullification of US federal laws was widely practiced by US state legislatures and recognized by US federal courts as constitutional, as above-mentioned examples demonstrate.

Furthermore, the Kansas Second Amendment Protection Act is passed to protect the second amendment to the US constitution, the text of which is clear:

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

This signifies that a US citizen is allowed to keep and bear personal weapons that can be kept and carried - military knives, handguns, semi-automatic and automatic rifles, machine guns, grenades, portable grenade launchers, portable missile launchers, portable anti-aircraft missiles, portable anti-tank missiles, portable naval missiles and appropriate munitions, without any license or registration.

The US federal law acknowledges that convicted felons who committed a felony, criminal in character, and not criminalized civil or political conduct, and criminally insane individuals, who were institutionalized by decisions of US courts as a punishment for committing a felony, criminal in character, and not criminalized civil or political conduct, can be prohibited from ownerships of personal weapons as a part of punishment for their crimes, since felons who committed a felony, criminal in character, and not criminalized civil or political conduct, and criminally insane individuals, who were institutionalized as a punishment for committing a felony, criminal in character, and not criminalized civil or political conduct, were not recognized as US citizens in saner times. For this purpose professional gun dealers are required to carry background checks of the US citizens who purchase firearms from them in federal and state databases of felons and criminally insane individuals. Furthermore, the US federal law regulates firearms importation into the United States of America and establishment standards for safekeeping of firearms in US military bases and federal government agencies.

US federal gun control laws however went far in excess of the above-mentioned objective and compelling restrictions, prohibiting the whole classes of automatic personal weapons manufactured after a certain date from private ownership of firearms and establishing various burdensome licensing and registration requirements for particular classes of automatic personal weapons. It is clear that US federal gun control laws in excess of prohibition of firearms ownership for convicted felons, who committed a felony, criminal in character, and not criminalized civil or political conduct, and criminally insane individuals, who were institutionalized by decisions of US courts as a punishment for committing a felony, criminal in character, and not criminalized civil or political conduct, and requiring from professional gun dealers to carry background checks of the US citizens who purchase firearms from them in federal and state databases of felons and criminally insane individuals are unconstitutional, being not made in pursuance of an objective and compelling state interest, as statistics suggest that 80% of personal weapons in the hands of criminals that US federal gun control laws are alleged to prevent from firearms ownership come from black markets supplied with weapons unlawfully imported into the United States of America or stolen from US military bases and law enforcement agencies, and unduly, unreasonably and significantly burden the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms of US citizens and residents, protected in the second amendment to the US constitution. In fact, prevention of gun violence is not a legitimate state interest: the state cannot prevent gun violence, which is the objective of houses of worship and educational institutions, the state can only punish violent criminals.

Furthermore, the Kansas Second Amendment Protection Act is motivated by an objective state interest in providing for public safety in Kansas by keeping the US citizens residing in the state of Kansas well-armed, and, in consequence, for strengthening the national guard of Kansas and the national defense of the United States of America, for which well-armed US citizenry is essential. In fact, public safety in Kansas is threatened by well-armed criminals, who have no problem obtaining personal weapons from black markets, and, as a result, US citizens and even Christian churches are unsafe, as Westborough Baptist church that is for long term terrorized, regularly shot at, firebombed, vandalized and its members beaten by homosexual thugs solely for their opposition to homosexuality, lesbianism and transvestitism. The Kansas Second Amendment Protection Act makes it possible for unpopular US citizens who otherwise cannot count on police protection to easily purchase personal weapons for protection, that otherwise would not be swiftly available to them, to avoid clear and present dangers to health and life. Scientific research by dr. John Lott statistically established beyond reasonable doubt that more guns equals less crime.

Therefore, the Kansas Second Amendment Protection Act is the successful state nullification law, properly and wisely passed by the Kansas state legislature to nullify clearly unconstitutional US federal gun control laws made contrary to the second amendment to the US constitution in the territory of the state of Kansas. The proper response by US federal courts to the Kansas Second Amendment Protection Act is thus to reject the Brady center lawsuit against the Kansas Second Amendment Protection Act on the grounds that Brady center has no legal standing to challenge the Kansas Second Amendment Protection Act, deferring to the wisdom of the Kansas legislature that passed the Kansas Second Amendment Protection Act, which is an example of a state law, made subject to powers reserved to the state of Kansas among the other US states under the ninth and the tenth amendments to the US constitution and to the constitution of the United States in legitimate exercise of state authority to prevent federal usurpation of the rights reserved to US states and to the American people and superior in the territory of the state of Kansas to clearly unconstitutional US federal gun control laws made contrary to the second amendment to the US constitution.

Another successful act of nullification of unconstitutional US federal gun control laws is the decision of the US congressional staffer, Ryan Shucard, to bring a handgun and a magazine into the US congressional building for self-defense purposes, exercising his derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms, recognized and protected in the second amendment to the US constitution.

To remind, the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms is established by God, proceeds from God and is only recognized and protected in the second amendment to the US constitution.

Lord God Jehovah said:

Book of Enoch, Section 17, Chapter 90
And I saw till a great sword was given to the sheep


Lord Jesus Christ said:

Luke 22:36
And he that hath no sword let him sell his garment and buy one

thereby allowing and ordering each worshiper of Lord God Jehovah and each worshiper of Lord Jesus Christ to own a personal weapon.

Luke 22:38 furthermore established that apostles of Lord Jesus Christ had purchased, owned and carried two personal weapons – swords - for themselves and their relatives, ownership and carry of which was prohibited to non-Roman citizens, thereby legalizing ownership and carry of personal weapons by citizens and residents of the state.

Since all power is given unto Lord Jesus Christ in heaven and on earth (Matthew 28:1 and the earth and heaven shall pass away, but the words of Lord Jesus Christ will not pass away (Matthew 24:35), all American or international enemies of the second amendment to the US constitution will not prevail, but the actions of all American and foreign enemies of the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms of US citizens, recognized and protected in the second amendment to the US constitution, will only bring more personal weapons to be owned and carried by US citizens.

The text of the second amendment to the US constitution is clear:

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

This signifies that a US citizen is allowed to keep and bear personal weapons that can be kept and carried - military knives, handguns, semi-automatic and automatic rifles, machine guns, grenades, portable grenade launchers, portable missile launchers, portable anti-aircraft missiles, portable anti-tank missiles, portable naval missiles and appropriate munitions, without any license or registration.

This also signifies that a US citizen can bring a personal weapon for self-defense purposes into a US federal building, and it is not lawful for the police either to arrest or detain him for carrying a firearm without a license: if any license is required to carry a firearm in a US federal building, the police shall issue such a license to a US citizen carrying a personal weapon, release him, return to him his personal weapon and wish him well. In fact, even in 1920s many US federal employees came to US federal buildings and US Congressional hearings armed with personal weapons, and no one objected to it and feared it, not speaking of the US presidents George Washington and Andrew Jackson who were armed at all times and visited all US federal buildings armed.

This of course should be done wisely. If a US citizen who is not a US federal employee comes to the US federal building armed with personal weapons, it is important first and foremost to distinguish personal weapons that can reasonably be used for self-defense in US federal buildings: military knives, handguns, semi-automatic and automatic rifles, machine guns. For military knives, handguns, semi-automatic and automatic rifles, machine guns safe boxes should be available in the lobby of federal buildings: and the police should ask armed US citizens who are not US federal employees to store their personal weapons in safe boxes before entry inside US federal buildings, and on return from US federal buildings armed US citizens can collect their personal weapons. If US citizens who are not US federal employees carry grenades, portable grenade launchers, portable missile launchers, portable anti-aircraft missiles, portable anti-tank missiles, portable naval missiles, that cannot be reasonably used for self-defense purposes in US federal buildings, the police shall politely ask such US citizens who are not US federal employees to bring grenades, portable grenade launchers, portable missile launchers, portable anti-aircraft missiles, portable anti-tank missiles, portable naval missiles back to their residences and come back thereafter. This is done because a US citizen who is not a US federal employee has no security clearance.

In contrast, a US citizen who is a US federal employee can come inside a US federal building with personal weapons that can reasonably be used for self-defense in US federal buildings - military knives, handguns, semi-automatic and automatic rifles, machine guns - and it is not lawful for the police to prevent his entry inside a US federal building, because a US citizen who is a US federal employee has security clearance and can reasonably be expected to carry out such personal weapons for self-defense purposes, thereby exercising his derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms, recognized and protected in the second amendment to the US constitution, that clearly applies in US federal buildings. If any license is required, the police shall issue such a license for a personal weapon to a US federal employee who can come inside a US federal building with personal weapons that can reasonably be used for self-defense in US federal buildings - military knives, handguns, semi-automatic and automatic rifles, machine guns - return to him his personal weapon, let him in and wish him well.

The United States of America is established as a free state, in which neither the American people fear the US federal government, nor the US federal government fears the American people. This signifies that the US federal government is not afraid of armed US citizens, including the armed US citizens who come inside US federal buildings with security clearances. In a free state an armed citizen is let inside the government building, because the government does not conspire against the citizens of the state, and therefore the government does not fear armed citizens of the state.

This does not mean that reasonable precautions should not be taken: security clearances of all US federal employees shall be thoroughly carried out, armored panic rooms shall be established on every floor of US federal buildings, armed US public safety personnel shall be present on every floor of US federal buildings, medical centers shall be available within 30 minutes’ drive from any US federal building. Similarly, US statesmen, representatives and officials can carry bulletproof vests, although in a well guarded federal buildings a criminal, even if armed with a machine gun, cannot wound or kill more than one or two persons. Nevertheless, American freedom requires that armed US citizens who are US federal employees with security clearance can enter inside US federal buildings armed to prevent the dangerous separation between US citizens who are governed from US citizens who govern, and instill respect for and appreciation of the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms of US citizens and residents, that makes American freedom possible for all US citizens, preventing unhealthy elitist tendencies, hostile to American freedom, from appearing among US federal statesmen, representatives and officials and preventing from spread of fears between US citizens and the US federal government.

Therefore, prosecution of the US congressional staffer, Ryan Shucard, for carrying a handgun without license shall be closed, the police shall issue an appropriate license to the US congressional staffer, Ryan Shucard, for his handgun, return his handgun to him with apologies for his arrest and release him, allowing him to carry a handgun into the US federal buildings in which Mr. Shucard works, as Mr. Shucard has already obtained security clearance to work in US federal buildings, and is therefore legally presumed to be a law abiding US citizen carrying a personal weapon for self-defense purposes, in accordance with his constitutional second amendment rights. Indeed, Mr. Shucard, a true American patriot, knows well and jealously guards his derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms, recognized and protected in the second amendment to the US constitution.

It is also important not to demonize portable missile launchers, portable anti-aircraft missiles, portable anti-tank missiles, portable naval missiles – these are personal weapons that became necessary to be owned by US citizens already in the last century, once fascist and communist governments in European countries misused military aircrafts, military helicopters, battle tanks and warships against civilian population. In fact, portable missile launchers, portable anti-aircraft missiles, portable anti-tank missiles, portable naval missiles can be owned and carried by US citizens in accordance with their derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms of US citizens and residents, recognized and protected in the second amendment to the US constitution, although US states can establish reasonable requirements with regard to minimal training necessary to successfully operate portable missile launchers, portable anti-aircraft missiles, portable anti-tank missiles, portable naval missiles with regard to civilians who did not serve in US armed forces or the US national guard, as well as registration requirements with regard to portable missile launchers, portable anti-aircraft missiles, portable anti-tank missiles, portable naval missiles, so that US citizens residing in a US state, who own portable missile launchers, portable anti-aircraft missiles, portable anti-tank missiles, portable naval missiles, can be swiftly called to the state national guard to defend the territory of a US state with their portable missile launchers, portable anti-aircraft missiles, portable anti-tank missiles, portable naval missiles in case of need. In fact, contrary to popular fears and claims, portable anti-aircraft missiles and portable anti-aircraft missile launchers do not threaten civilian aviation and are used largely against low flying military helicopters and military aircrafts: i.e., Ukrainian plane in Donetsk and Lugansk regions was destroyed not with portable anti-aircraft missile and not with portable anti-aircraft missile launcher but by stationary radar-armed anti-aircraft missile complex. It is important to remember that US citizens are free and well armed sheep.

Indeed, all this hostility to the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms of US citizens and residents, recognized and protected in the second amendment to the US constitution, stems out of unwillingness to recognize simple objective truths that guns do not kill people, but evil people do, and more guns equals less crime, since more guns always signifies more guns in the hands of law abiding citizens, as criminals always have black markets to get their firearms. In fact, if Brady center truly cares for reduction of gun violence, it shall direct its effort towards enforcement of US drug laws against drugs other than pot or ecstasy, as abuse of drugs other than pot or ecstasy is statistically found to be behind half of violent crimes in the United States of America, for establishment of the automatic death penalty for all murderers of two or more US citizens to deter gun violence, for enforcement of US immigration laws to prevent foreign felons from entering into the United States of America, or if such enter, to be swiftly deported back to their homelands, and for promotion of installation of armored panic rooms in US government buildings, corporations, education institutions, hospitals, organizations, etc. that significantly reduce the number of deaths from gun violence.

What should discontented citizens who do not want to possess a firearm and want to live in a community without private firearms ownership do? First, they can collectively purchase land and establish gated communities on private land, where firearms ownership can be temporarily restricted through voluntary agreements between the community and land owners or tenants, provided there is a place in a district, wherein such a community is established, wherein the civil right guaranteed by the 2nd amendment to the US constitution is fully respected. Such a community can hire a private security firm or invite state law enforcement to provide law enforcement services to the community. Alternatively, discontented citizens can lobby for a constitutional amendment reflecting their political ideas, although, given popularity of firearms in the American society, such an amendment is unlikely to be passed. Thus, those Americans who do not want to live with firearms are free to do so, both individually and collectively, as well as to peacefully advocate their political views: they should not, however, conspire to interfere with the constitutional rights of other American citizens through unlawful executive, legislative, or court acts, or through unconstitutional international agreements.
fdtwain is offline  
Old April 17th, 2016, 09:49 PM   #20
Banned
 
fdtwain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Europe
Posts: 618
What should American citizens who support firearms ownership and the second amendment to the US constitution do?

First, it is important to know and understand that the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms is established by God, proceeds from God and is only recognized and protected in the second amendment to the US constitution.

Lord God Jehovah said:

Book of Enoch, Section 17, Chapter 90
And I saw till a great sword was given to the sheep

Lord Jesus Christ said:

Luke 22:36
And he that hath no sword let him sell his garment and buy one

thereby allowing and ordering each worshiper of Lord God Jehovah and each worshiper of Lord Jesus Christ to own a personal weapon.

Luke 22:38 furthermore established that apostles of Lord Jesus Christ had purchased, owned and carried two personal weapons – swords - for themselves and their relatives, ownership and carry of which was prohibited to non-Roman citizens, thereby legalizing ownership and carry of personal weapons by citizens and residents of the state.

Since all power is given unto Lord Jesus Christ in heaven and on earth (Matthew 28:1 and the earth and heaven shall pass away, but the words of Lord Jesus Christ will not pass away (Matthew 24:35), all American and foreign enemies of the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms of US citizens, recognized and protected in the second amendment to the US constitution, will not prevail, but the actions of all American and foreign enemies of the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms of US citizens, recognized and protected in the second amendment to the US constitution, will only bring more personal weapons to be owned and carried by US citizens.

The text of the second amendment to the US constitution is clear:

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

This signifies that a US citizen is allowed to keep and bear personal weapons that can be kept and carried - military knives, handguns, semi-automatic and automatic rifles, machine guns, grenades, portable grenade launchers, portable missile launchers, portable anti-aircraft missiles, portable anti-tank missiles, portable naval missiles and appropriate munitions, without any license or registration.

Every American family should purchase guns: at least one and better two machine guns and/or automatic weapons or semi-automatic weapons with at least 12,000 rounds of ammunition per every male member of the household, at least one and better two handguns with at least 1,200 rounds of ammunition per every female member of household, and at least two military knives per each member of the household. US citizens shall not register their firearms and ammunition as guns registration is gun confiscation, and shall own and carry their personal weapons without fear, following their derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms. Furthermore, every American should create 8-year food store to be ready to any disruptions of food supply. Every American family should also purchase a separate residence, and if it possesses sufficient funds, at least a hectare of land per each family member, to learn vegetable and fruit gardening and to keep cattle and poultry wherever reasonable. Finally, every American family should sell the stocks of large corporations, presently overvalued at least 3 times through run away inflation - the consequence of FRS money printing - and put their savings beyond 3- to 6-month salary in cash, in 2/3 into gold and in 1/3 into silver, to preserve their savings from run away inflation, which is inevitable, given the scale of money printing in the US and throughout the world. It is lawful for a US citizen to wound and kill a US official, representative, statesman who tries to forcefully confiscate his weapons, bearing neither legal nor moral responsibility, since it is lawful to kill in defense of movable property (Exodus 22:2). In dealing with American or foreign enemies, the appropriate way is: resist the devil and he will flee from you (James 4:7). Finally, it is important for US citizens who have appropriate funds at their disposal to establish a second residence in European states and to purchase property in Europe to be able to flee any federal persecution if such commences.

Some people strangely oppose to the US citizens taking responsible measures to protect their future and the future of their families, advising to focus on restoration of American liberty instead. Yet personal preparedness does not contradict taking collective actions to restore American liberty: in fact individual preparedness serves as a basis of taking collective actions to restore American liberty.

Furthermore, self-defense militias of the American people should be formed in all US states and districts. These militias should work independently or in association with the NRA and/or as a part of the US national guard to protect Christian faith and the Law of the Lord, customs and traditions of the American people, and the natural, derivative natural, civil and traditional rights of US citizens and residents as well as the rights and authority of US states and districts against federal usurpation or foreign aggression. The federal, state and district government should not harass activists of self-defense militias of the American people, or try to disarm or dismantle self-defense militias of the American people. Self-defense militias of the American people should concentrate on identifying and reporting criminals and illegal immigrants in their communities, assisting the national guard of the borderline US states to protect the US border, and preparing and training to resist federal usurpation or foreign aggression. State governors should facilitate the activities of self-defense militias of the American people in their states by promoting law enforcement training and military training for militia members in association with members of the US national guard and the state police. The governors of US states should also develop contingency plans for the national guard of the US state to replace US army units for defense of their respective states, and should be ready to order the national guard of their respective states to resist any unconstitutional federal executive orders, laws or court decisions. Ideally, each US state shall have at least 20000 organized, trained and armed US national guardsmen ready to be deployed within the state in 24 hours.

It is necessary to organize an effective lobbying effort against any attempts to ratify the UN arms trade treaty and to pass so-called gun control laws in the US Congress and the legislatures of US states. The NRA and the Republican party should use the ATT as an opportunity to educate US citizens about the fallacies of gun control, and seek reversal of existing unlawful statutes restricting the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms in the US Congress, the congresses of US states, and in US courts. It is also important for the NRA to conduct a public relations campaign to illustrate how wide availability of guns and respect for the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms reduces crime in republican nations as Switzerland, makes a republican nation prepared to resist foreign aggression, and liberates nations as in the case of free Libya, unjustly defamed by some in the US Congress.

Furthermore, it is important for US citizens to disobey any executive orders of the US president, unlawfully restraining the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms. US citizens should also disobey any federal, state or local law requiring registration, confiscation or prohibition of firearms, since registration of firearms is unlawful under the 2nd amendment to the US constitution. US citizens should also continue the fight in the US court system against any unlawful laws passed by state legislatures. If any law restricting the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms is passed by the US Congress, any executive order restricting the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms is made by the president of the United States, or any judgment of the US supreme court restricting the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms is made, specifically mandating registration, confiscation or prohibition of firearms, US citizens should not comply with the above-mentioned provisions, and the governors and legislatures of US states should nullify the above-mentioned provisions in the territories of their states by a state law, stating the provisions of the 2nd and 10th amendments to the US constitution as basis for nullification. It is important to gradually discard the faulty reasoning that federal law is always superior to state law: in fact, state law, made subject to its reserved powers and the constitution of the United States, can and should be superior to federal law, if it does not exceed state power and is not contrary to the US constitution. Such state law in such circumstances is legitimate exercise of state authority to prevent federal usurpation of the rights reserved to the states or to the people.

Similarly, if a state law restricting the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms is passed by state legislature, specifically mandating registration, confiscation or prohibition of firearms, US citizens should not comply with the provisions of such a state law, and legislatures of state districts should nullify the above-mentioned provisions of a state law in the territories of their districts by district law, stating the provisions of the 2nd, 10th and 14th amendments to the US constitution as basis for nullification. In such a case, a district law, made subject to the reserved powers of the people and the constitution of the United States, can and should be superior to a state law, if it does not exceed district power, is made to protect the civil rights of the citizens of the United States and is not contrary to the US constitution. Such a district law in such circumstances is legitimate exercise of district authority to prevent state usurpation of the rights reserved to the people by the bill of rights.

Furthermore, if a particular district law or an act, restricting the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms, is passed in a district, specifically mandating registration, confiscation or prohibition of firearms, US citizens should not comply with the provisions of such a law or an act, state legislature should abolish the district law by the state law, preventing an unconstitutional district law from entering into legal force. Alternatively, such a law should be challenged in a state or federal court to prevent it from entering into legal force.

The juries of US citizens shall not convict, fine, arrest, imprison, condemn to forced labor, condemn to forced medical treatment US citizens who possess and carry personal weapons: military knives, handguns, semi-automatic and automatic rifles, machine guns, grenades, portable grenade launchers, portable missile launchers, portable anti-aircraft missiles, portable anti-tank missiles, portable naval missiles and appropriate munitions, without license or registration, applying jury nullification – power of the jury over both the law and the facts of the case and respecting the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms of US citizens, recognized and protected in the second amendment to the US constitution, unless such US citizens are prohibited from possession and carrying personal weapons as a punishment for committing a felony crime, criminal in character, and not criminalized civil and political conduct, or declared criminally insane by US courts as a punishment for committing a felony crime, criminal in character, and not criminalized civil and political conduct.

Finally, if an international treaty is signed by the US president, restricting the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms, specifically mandating registration, confiscation or prohibition of firearms, such a treaty is invalid from its signing date, being contrary to the provisions of the US constitution, which are always superior to international treaties, the US senate should not ratify such a treaty, the US supreme court should strike down the provisions of such a treaty, US states should nullify such a treaty, and US citizens should not comply with the provisions of such a treaty.

Secondly, judging Christian churches should be established in every US district and a judging church should establish a Christian religious court in every US district. A Christian religious court should judge all civil cases with the value of disputed property not exceeding the market value of 14,700 ounces of silver if both sides of the case agree to the judgment. Furthermore, a judging Christian church should register births, deaths and marriages and should justify Christians who kill in the following circumstances in accordance with the judgments of Lord God Jehovah, Lord Jesus Christ, Holy Spirit, bearing neither legal nor moral responsibility:

- it is lawful to take property, wound and kill those who commit the abominable deeds of sexual perversions (homosexuality (Leviticus 20:13), lesbianism (Leviticus 20:13), bestiality (Leviticus 20:15), incest (Leviticus 20:11-17), pedophilia (sexual relations with girls below 12 years of age) (Leviticus 20:2-3, Matthew 18:6)), abominations (child murders (abortions) (Leviticus 20:2-3, Exodus 21:22-25), change of gender (Book of Enoch Section XVII, Chapter 86, Section II, Chapter 10), cannibalism (Book of Enoch, Section II, Chapter 7,10), human cloning (Book of Enoch Section XVII, Chapter 86, Section II, Chapter 10)), intentional murder (Exodus 21:14), enslavement of men/women (Exodus 21:16) or selling of men/women to slavery (Exodus 21:16);
- it is lawful to wound and kill in defense of life (Exodus 21:14), liberty (Exodus 21:16), movable property, land up 100 hectares per man/family and real estate upon such land (Exodus 22:2), dignity from rape, which in its nature is enslavement (Exodus 21:16) and physical assault, which in its nature is attempted murder (Exodus 21:14);
- it is lawful for a US citizen to warn a foreign citizen, or a non-citizen, not born in the territory of the USA, to leave the territory of the USA, and if such a foreign citizen or a non-citizen does not leave on his or her own, subsequently forcefully repatriate such a foreign citizen or a non-citizen (Exodus 23:4). If such a foreign citizen resists repatriation, it is lawful to take property, wound and kill such a foreign citizen or a non-citizen, for such came to steal, kill and destroy (John 10:1,10; Exodus 21:14; Exodus 22:2);
- it is lawful for a US citizen to warn a foreign armed soldier to leave the territory of the USA, and if such an armed foreign soldier does not leave on his own, it is lawful to take property, wound and kill such a foreign armed soldier, he is an enslaver (Exodus 21:16);
- it is lawful for US citizen(s) to take property, wound and kill soldiers of aggressive foreign nations and their armed collaborators in a war against foreign aggression until just peace is established, those who initiated an aggressive war punished, and the territorial integrity of the states against which an aggressive war was waged is restored (Exodus 17:14,16, I Samuel 15:3);
- it is lawful to wound and kill a government official who takes children from parents for the cause other than infliction of a physical disability or engaging a child into prostitution or production of pornography - he is an enslaver (Exodus 21:16);
- it is lawful to wound and kill those who forcefully impose electronic numbers for taxpayers and social security identification, forcefully impose any marks, numbers, writings, microchips upon human skin or inside human body for any reason, forcefully collect and store biometric information as fingerprints, eye scan, DNA-samples, without a written court order supported by clear and compelling evidence, sufficient to accuse of felony a person from whom biometric evidence is collected - such are enslavers (Exodus 21:16);
- it is lawful to wound and kill a man-god and his followers who force men to worship him as god and forcefully impose any marks, numbers, writings, microchips upon human skin or inside human body for any reason (Revelation 19:20-21);
- it is lawful to wound and kill a government official who arrests, imprisons, condemns to forced labor, condemns to forced medical treatment, wounds or kills in retaliation of exercise of the derivative-natural rights to absolute freedom of speech, freedom of peaceful assembly and association, freedom of Christian religion, derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and keep and bear arms - such is an enslaver (Exodus 21:16);
- it is lawful for a husband or a wife who has committed no adultery to wound and kill a wife or husband who has committed adultery (Leviticus 20:10).

A judging Christian church shall absolve the US citizens and residents who kill in aforementioned circumstances of any legal or moral responsibility for their just deeds by an act of remission of sins. Furthermore, a judging Christian church shall begin to compile the lists of US citizens and residents residing in a district who committed the abominable deeds of sexual perversions (homosexuality, lesbianism, bestiality, incest, pedophilia (sexual relations with girls below 12 years of age)), abominations (child murders (abortions), change of gender, cannibalism, human cloning), intentional murder, enslavement of men/women or selling of men/women to slavery, and to put such lists to the internet for faithful Christians to avoid dealing with the doers of the abominable deeds.

Christian churches in US districts should promote home schooling for European (White) and Christian children, by establishing websites with home schooling resources in association with HSLDA and should establish at least one Christian non-government liberal art academy providing classical education, a Christian non-government trade academy teaching business trades and professions, and a Christian non-government technical college teaching technical sciences in each US district. These educational institutions should award their own qualifications, not certified by the state or certification agencies, and should specifically require its staff and students to be Christians.

Christian churches in US districts should establish at least one Christian charitable medical clinic in each US district, providing preventative medical care and basic medical care to patients on the basis of ability to pay and independent of US insurance schemes. This medical clinic should specifically require its staff and students to be Christians and train a sufficient number of midwives.

Christian churches in US districts and states should establish citizens’ district and state councils, by electing two competent and moral representatives from each Christian church into the district council for the term of one year, and two competent and moral representatives from each district council into a state council for the term of two years. Each district and state council in association with appropriate non-government organizations should monitor and report legal acts of the US government infringing upon the natural rights, derivative-natural rights, civil rights, traditional rights of the citizens and residents of the United States, the rights and authority of the US districts and states.

Specifically, citizens’ district and state councils should focus on:

- lobbying state governments to issue gold and silver coins and bullion, and passing legal tender laws authorizing gold and silver coins and bullion as legal tender in the territory of each state, valued at current market price expressed in US dollars;
- lobbying US state governments and the US federal government to repatriate all illegal immigrants from the territory of the United States and construct an appropriate fence on the US-Mexico border to eliminate long-term unemployment in the United States largely caused by mass illegal immigration;
- lobbying the US federal government to dissolve the NAFTA trade agreement and to focus on admitting Canadian provinces to the United States of America as new US states, if Canadian provinces desire this;
- repealing all existing legal statutes, infringing upon the derivative-natural rights to absolute freedom of speech, freedom of peaceful assembly and association, freedom of Christian religion, the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and keep and bear arms, other civil rights of US citizens, districts and states, guaranteed by the Bill of Rights. In particular, repealing together with the national rifle association and the US republican party all restrictions on ownership and carrying of automatic rifles and machine guns produced after 1986, by US citizens;
- prohibiting by state and federal law and preferably by constitutional amendments to the state and the US constitution, forceful imposition of electronic numbers for taxpayers and social security identification, forceful imposition of any marks, numbers, writings, microchips upon human skin or inside human body for any reason, forceful collection and storage of biometric information as fingerprints, eye scan, DNA-samples, without a written court order supported by clear and compelling evidence sufficient to accuse of felony a person from whom biometric evidence is collected;
- establishing the death penalty in all cases in US federal and state law as punishment of the doers of the abominable deeds of sexual perversions (homosexuality, lesbianism, bestiality, incest, pedophilia (sexual relations with girls below 12 years of age)), abominations (child murders (abortions), change of gender, cannibalism, human cloning), intentional murder, enslavement of men/women or selling of men/women to slavery, and absolving by US federal and state law from legal responsibility those who take property, wound and kill the doers of the abominable deeds of sexual perversions (homosexuality, lesbianism, bestiality, incest, pedophilia (sexual relations with girls below 12 years of age)), abominations (child murders (abortions), change of gender, cannibalism, human cloning), intentional murder, enslavement of men/women or selling of men/women to slavery;
- lobbying the US federal government to strengthen NATO and to admit Australia and New Zealand as NATO members if these nations wish so;
- establishing US foreign policy on the basis of US exceptionalism, making the US neither an imperial nation, nor a part of the global government, but a great first-class regional power preserving its exclusive interests in Latin America and NATO military alliance, and building relations with all other nations on the basis of bilateral mutually beneficial peaceful cooperation, promoting regional economic integration rather than global government or global governance schemes;
- promotion of restoration of the United States of America to its European (White), Christian and republican roots, and peaceful repatriation of the US citizens and residents of non-White ethnicity back to their respective nations or third nations, wherein those US citizens and residents can play a positive role in promoting political rights and freedoms and economic development;
- cooperating with the US Republican party to nominate competent and moral candidates to all district, state and federal government positions throughout the United States to provide economically and politically sound policy alternatives to the American people, consistent with Christian faith and the Law of the Lord, customs and traditions of the American people and American statecraft, autonomy, self-government, rights and authority of US states, districts and tribes, natural rights, derivative-natural rights, civil rights and traditional rights of US citizens and residents;
- cooperating with the US Republican party to propose to the US Congress a realistic debt restructuring and debt repayment plan as well as appropriate reduction in US federal spending;
- cooperating with the US Republican party to propose to US Congress a realistic taxation reduction plan to gradually reduce federal taxes to 10% income tax, 10% social tax, and 10% customs tariff with the exclusion of all other taxes as US national debt is progressively paid;
- cooperating with the US Republican party to reduce the scope of the US federal government and gradually restore to states, districts and the American people the rights reserved to them by the 10th amendment to the US constitution;
- promotion of establishment of small and medium-sized American businesses hiring American citizens and producing goods on US soil in association with appropriate non-government organizations and financial institutions.

In repatriation of illegal immigrants from the United States of America it is important not to treat illegal immigrants inhumanely. For example, the recent influx of illegal minors into the United States of America requires a reasonable approach. It is clear that illegal minors cannot stay in the United States of America, yet the repatriation cases of illegal minors shall be processed within one year, while illegal minors shall be adequately fed, clothed and housed, given one time grant of 1,000 USD on repatriation from the United States of America and wished a safe journey home: it is important for the US federal government to allocate a part of US economic assistance due to the countries from which illegal minors come to the United States of America to fund the costs of humane repatriation of illegal minors which is in fact the best economic assistance of the United States of America towards these countries. It is also important to invite US charitable foundations willing to fund basic medical care, Spanish and English literacy programs and basic trade and professional training for illegal minors to deal humanely with them.

It is also important to respect the sovereign immunity and authority of the honorable US senators and representatives who have sovereign immunity from civil and criminal prosecution while in office, unless the abominable deeds of sexual perversions (homosexuality, lesbianism, bestiality, incest, pedophilia (sexual relations with girls below 12 years of age)), abominations (child murders (abortions), change of gender, cannibalism, human cloning), intentional murder, enslavement of men/women or selling of men/women to slavery are committed by them. In particular, it is completely unacceptable to prevent honorable senator John McCain from taking pictures in a US federal illegal immigrant facility: honorable senator John McCain is a US statesman elected by the US people that granted him authority to enter and make pictures in US federal buildings as honorable senator John McCain desires to be subsequently used in establishing US legislation and US government policy, it is important to be reasonable with regard to honorable US senators and representatives, as the US federal government has nothing to hide from them.

How should an American citizen react to any gun confiscation scheme, either state or federal? An American citizen should at least shut himself in his house and prepare to shoot any enforcers of an unconstitutional gun confiscation scheme, justly killing in defense of his property: the blood of such enforcers is upon them. An American citizen should fight such enforcers to the last men, woman and child of his family, and should remember what judeo-bolsheviks did to the Russians, who foolishly permitted themselves to be disarmed, arresting and torturing them. Thus it is better to die free, fighting in dignity than to be tortured by such enforcers who routinely permit their inmates to be raped by negroes and other non-Whites, loosing dignity, for the worst federal enforcers can do to dead bodies is to violate them as US soldiers regularly do to dead Taliban freedom fighters and other dead enemies. Able American citizens should join self-defense militias of the American people, hunt and shoot down such enforcers of an unconstitutional gun confiscation scheme, and furthermore be prepared to hunt and shoot down all doers of the abominable deeds of sexual perversions (homosexuality, lesbianism, bestiality, incest, pedophilia (sexual relations with girls below 12 years of age)), abominations (child murders (abortions), change of gender, cannibalism, human cloning), intentional murder, enslavement of men/women or selling of men/women to slavery in their districts and states, eradicating filth from US soil, who bring degeneration and trouble, and should repatriate the jews and non-Whites from the United States of America to their nations or third countries. District and state councils should coordinate the activities of self-defense militias of the American people in resistance to gun confiscation schemes, together with patriotic district and state governments and the US national guard, until US soil is liberated and a gun confiscation scheme repealed. Subsequently, the US federal government should be restructured, reelected and reappointed, all unconstitutional legislation repealed and American liberty restored.

Thus, US nationalists, patriots, republicans, conservatives, fundamentalists and White men and women will successfully resist any gun registration, prohibition, or confiscation scheme proposed by the obama administration and coalition of zionists, masons, democrats, communists, socialists and coloreds that support it. And US nationalists, patriots, republicans, conservatives, fundamentalists and White men and women will defend American liberty with firearms till death, keeping their firearms in defiance of the UN arms trade treaty and any obama gun-control law. US nationalists, patriots, republicans, conservatives, fundamentalists and White men and women shall give a simple answer to all American and foreign enemies of the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms of US citizens, recognized and protected in the second amendment to the US constitution: you can get my gun from my cold dead hands.
fdtwain is offline  
Reply

  Defending The Truth Political Forum > Political Issues > Money and Finance > Economics

Tags
american, defending, freedom



Search tags for this page
Click on a term to search for related topics.
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Will Native American Religious Freedom Count As Much As Hobby Lobby's? skews13 Current Events 13 July 27th, 2015 06:05 AM
If burning the American Flag is considered Freedom of Speech, FOXNEWS Current Events 64 December 30th, 2013 05:35 AM
A New Birth of American Freedom sumara Current Events 9 July 8th, 2013 11:44 AM
Government Freedom Cartoon: "Make Mine Freedom" Dude111 Political Talk 0 November 29th, 2010 09:39 PM


Facebook Twitter RSS Feed



Copyright © 2005-2013 Defending The Truth. All rights reserved.