Political Forums  

Go Back   Defending The Truth Political Forum > Political Issues > Money and Finance > Economics


Thanks Tree11Thanks
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old April 19th, 2016, 12:41 AM   #41
Banned
 
fdtwain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Europe
Posts: 618
Defending American freedom

Some democrats improperly and unwisely called for unconstitutional, unlawful and groundless restrictions on the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms for US citizens and residents listed in so-called terror watch lists.

In fact, the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms of a US citizen or a US resident, recognized and protected in the second amendment to the US constitution, cannot be abridged on the basis of mere suspicion of terrorist activities that serve as a basis for listing a US citizen or a US resident in so-called terror watch lists.

The wording of the second amendment to the US constitution is clear:

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

The US federal law acknowledges that convicted felons, who committed a felony, criminal in character, and not criminalized civil or political conduct, and criminally insane individuals, who were institutionalized by decisions of US courts as a punishment for committing a felony, criminal in character, and not criminalized civil or political conduct, can be prohibited from ownerships of personal weapons as a part of punishment for their crimes, since felons, who committed a felony, criminal in character, and not criminalized civil or political conduct, and criminally insane individuals, who were institutionalized as a punishment for committing a felony, criminal in character, and not criminalized civil or political conduct, were not recognized as US citizens in saner times. Yet it is clear that mere suspicion of terrorism is not sufficient to deny US citizens and residents their derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms, recognized and protected under the second amendment to the US constitution, and those democrats who improperly and unwisely called for unconstitutional, unlawful and groundless restrictions on the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms for US citizens and residents listed in so-called terror watch lists advocate unconstitutional, unlawful and groundless prior restraint upon a constitutional right of US citizens and residents, prohibited by the second amendment to the US constitution.

At the same time, there are reasonable measures to be taken to prevent undesirable foreigners from coming to the United States of America. First, it is repatriation of all illegal and criminal foreign migrants present in the territory of the United States of America back to their homelands, except for those of them who married US citizens and produced children in marriage. Second, it is abolishment of the so-called visa waver program with 38 foreign nations, which allows foreign citizens to travel to the United States of America without necessary visa screening process, reasonable in these times of growing domestic and international terrorism worldwide. Finally, US border patrol agents may apply particular scrutiny to all foreign citizens who come to the United States of America, listed in so-called terror watch lists, even those who come to the United States of America within the so-called visa waver program, preventing their entry to the United States of America as undesirable foreigners by the sovereign decision of the United States of America that does not need any explanations. Therefore, those democrats who are concerned with possibility of foreigners listed in so-called terror watch lists coming to the United States of America should concern themselves with repatriation of illegal and criminal foreign migrants from the territory of the United States of America, with abolishment of the so-called visa waver program and with adequate funding of US border patrol agency, and not with unconstitutional, unlawful and groundless prior restraint upon constitutional rights of US citizens and residents.

How should a US citizen react to this siren song of gun control and civilian disarmament, peddled by some democrats? It is important in these perilous times for each US citizen to purchase an additional machine gun with 12,000 rounds of ammunition, or an automatic rifle with 12,000 rounds of ammunition, or a semiautomatic rifle with 12,000 rounds of ammunition, or a handgun with 1,200 rounds of ammunition for himself and his family until there are two machine guns with 12,000 rounds of ammunition each, or two automatic rifles with 12,000 rounds of ammunition each, or two semiautomatic rifles with 12,000 rounds of ammunition each, two handguns with 1,200 rounds of ammunition each, four military knives and a kevlar per each family member above 12 years of age, as well as to purchase and to give a firearm as a gift to his or her relative or a friend if income and savings allow. It shall be clear to all peddlers of gun control and civilian disarmament in the United States of America that they can take personal weapons of a US citizen or a US resident from his or her cold dead hands.
fdtwain is offline  
Old April 19th, 2016, 12:42 AM   #42
Banned
 
fdtwain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Europe
Posts: 618
Defending American freedom

A democratic senator and a democratic representative have improperly and unwisely submitted a draft bill to the United States Congress, which establishes unconstitutional, unlawful and groundless restrictions on the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms for US citizens and residents listed in so-called terror watch lists.

In fact, the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms of a US citizen or a US resident, recognized and protected in the second amendment to the US constitution, cannot be abridged on the basis of mere suspicion of terrorist activities that serve as a basis for listing a US citizen or a US resident in so-called terror watch lists. It is well established by objective facts that so-called terror watch lists contain many names of US citizens and residents whose political and religious opinions are unpopular with the US federal government and who are not in any way connected to genuine terrorism – killing of civilians for no objective reasons. It is also well known that presently many deeds, not connected to genuine terrorism – killing of civilians for no objective reasons, are regretfully defined as terrorism in US federal law or international anti-terrorist treaties, which retards effectiveness and efficiency of fight against terrorism, for genuine terrorists – those who kill civilians for no objective reasons - are not negotiated with, but either executed outright in accordance with the commandment of God (Exodus 21:14, Numbers 35:19, Matthew 5:18, Revelation 13:10), or judged in military court or civil courts, sentenced to death and executed in accordance with the commandment of God (Exodus 21:14, Matthew 5:18, Revelation 13:10). Therefore, mere listing a US citizen or a US resident in so-called terror watch lists cannot constitute objective and compelling state interest to deny him or her the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms, recognized and protected in the second amendment to the US constitution.

The wording of the second amendment to the US constitution is clear:

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

The US federal law acknowledges that convicted felons, who committed a felony, criminal in character, and not criminalized civil or political conduct, and criminally insane individuals, who were institutionalized by decisions of US courts as a punishment for committing a felony, criminal in character, and not criminalized civil or political conduct, can be prohibited from ownership of personal weapons as a part of punishment for their crimes, since felons, who committed a felony, criminal in character, and not criminalized civil or political conduct, and criminally insane individuals, who were institutionalized as a punishment for committing a felony, criminal in character, and not criminalized civil or political conduct, were not recognized as US citizens in saner times. Yet it is clear that mere suspicion of terrorism is not sufficient to deny US citizens and residents their derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms, recognized and protected under the second amendment to the US constitution, and those democrats who improperly and unwisely called for unconstitutional, unlawful and groundless restrictions on the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms for US citizens and residents listed in so-called terror watch lists advocate unconstitutional, unlawful and groundless prior restraint upon a constitutional right of US citizens and residents, prohibited by the second amendment to the US constitution.

Nor are the means sought by the democratic senator and the democratic representative necessary or proportionate to prevent genuine terrorists from obtaining personal weapons.

There are reasonable measures available to be taken to prevent undesirable foreigners from coming to the United States of America. First, it is repatriation of all illegal and criminal foreign migrants present in the territory of the United States of America back to their homelands, except for those of them who married US citizens and produced children in marriage. Second, it is abolishment of the so-called visa waver program with 38 foreign nations, which allows foreign citizens to travel to the United States of America without a necessary visa screening process, reasonable in these times of growing domestic and international terrorism worldwide. Finally, US border patrol agents may apply particular scrutiny to all foreign citizens who come to the United States of America, listed in so-called terror watch lists, even those who come to the United States of America within the so-called visa waver program, preventing their entry to the United States of America as undesirable foreigners by the sovereign decision of the United States of America that does not need any explanations. Therefore, those democrats who are concerned with the possibility of the foreigners listed in so-called terror watch lists coming to the United States of America should concern themselves with repatriation of illegal and criminal foreign migrants from the territory of the United States of America, with abolishment of the so-called visa waver program and with adequate funding of US border patrol agency, and not with unconstitutional, unlawful and groundless prior restraint upon constitutional rights of US citizens and residents.

Similarly, the United States of America has a sovereign right to remove US citizenship from those treasonous US citizens who wage war against the United States of America on behalf of other states, nations and peoples, or in armed domestic insurrections and armed rebellions against the United States of America.

Additionally, it is long overdue to establish in US federal and state laws the death sentence in all cases as a punishment for genuine terrorism – intentional murder of two or more civilians, not to keep and bread convicted terrorists at the expense of US taxpayers.

In fact, unconstitutional, unlawful and groundless restrictions on the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms for US citizens and residents listed in so-called terror watch lists would directly lead to de-facto abolishment of the second amendment to the US constitution, by allowing the US federal government to classify any US citizen as suspected terrorist merely on the basis of his or her political or religious opinion, which regretfully happened in the United States of America in the past, subsequently denying him or her in prior restraint and without due process of law their derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms, recognized and protected under the second amendment to the US constitution, which is prohibited in the second amendment to the US constitution that specifically establishes that the right of every US citizen to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed upon.

Importantly, the means sought by the democratic senator and the democratic representative are neither effective nor efficient, and are therefore unlikely to achieve their intended objectives. The history of the United States of America as well as the history of other nations of the world amply demonstrated to every reasonable man and woman that it is armed citizenry of the state that is the first and most effective line of defense against terrorists and anarchists: wherever the citizenry of the state is armed and reasonable public safety measures taken, terrorists end up with killing one or two persons at most. In contrast, whenever the citizenry of the state is disarmed and reasonable public safety measures are not taken, as in case of the recent terrorist attacks in France, terrorists end up killing dozens or even hundreds of innocent men, women and children, who, being disarmed and denied reasonable public safety measures, are unable to resist terrorists, who are well armed, easily obtaining their weapons from black markets. In case of France and Belgium socialist ideology was cited as a reason for disarmed citizenry and economy was cited as a reason for the failure to provide reasonable public safety measures, including panic rooms on every floor of every public building, and the price for this socialist ideology and this economy were dozens of French lives unnecessary lost to terrorists.

In fact, in times of terrorist threat it is important first and foremost to arm the people, even though there may be domestic terrorists among the people, precisely because terrorists can do far less damage when faced by the armed citizenry. The means sought by the democratic senator and the democratic representative would result in many disarmed citizens on the basis of mere suspicion of terrorism, some of whom belong to disadvantaged political and religious minorities, who, being often opposed to mainstream political and religious opinions, are already the primary target of domestic and foreign terrorists, as recent terrorist attacks on Charlie Hebdoe magazine demonstrated. Indeed, in present-day United States of America wherein the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms of US citizens and residents is recognized and protected in the second amendment to the US constitution, it is possible for a foreign terrorist to come into the United States of America, to purchase personal weapons and to kill one or two US citizens before he or she is stopped, which is the price of freedom, well worthy to be paid by every reasonable US citizen, every reasonable man and every reasonable woman, for the tree of liberty must be watered from time to time with blood of tyrants and patriots. Yet, the means sought by the democratic senator and the democratic representative would allow a foreign terrorist not only to come into the United States of America and to purchase personal weapons in black markets whence such obtain their arms, but also to kill dozens or even hundreds disarmed US citizens, attacking disadvantaged political and religious minorities that are presently at least armed with personal weapons and can defend themselves from terrorists, but who may well be disarmed as suspected terrorists in so-called terror watch lists by those in the US federal government who still fear jihadists or violent extremists under every bed.

In fact, American classical researchers, including American classical researcher John Lott, have statistically proved beyond reasonable doubt for all states, nations and peoples that more guns owned and carried by citizens and residents of the state leads to less crime, including less terrorism, committed in the state. Thus, the means sought by the democratic senator and the democratic representative would lead to fewer guns owned by US citizens and residents and therefore to more crime, including more grievous terrorist acts committed on the US soil, and not surprisingly: as American statesman Benjamin Franklin correctly observed, those who trade freedom for security get neither and deserve none.

Therefore, it is important for US republican senators and representatives to reject the draft bill submitted to the United States Congress, which establishes unconstitutional, unlawful and groundless restrictions on the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms for US citizens and residents listed in so-called terror watch lists, since this draft bill does not employ the necessary and proportionate means to advance an objective and compelling state interest, but unconstitutionally, unlawfully and groundlessly infringes upon the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms of US citizens and residents, recognized and protected in the second amendment to the US constitution.

It is important for US citizens and residents and for the national rifle association to contact their respective senators and representatives, politely expressing their opposition to the draft bill submitted to the United States Congress, which establishes unconstitutional, unlawful and groundless restrictions on the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms for US citizens and residents listed in so-called terror watch lists, since this draft bill does not employ the necessary and proportionate means to advance an objective and compelling state interest, but unconstitutionally, unlawfully and groundlessly infringes upon the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms of US citizens and residents, recognized and protected in the second amendment to the US constitution.
What should be done by republican, conservative, nationalist, patriotic, fundamentalist and European (White) men and women to defend American freedom? First, it is necessary to prepare to resist any attempts of civilian disarmament in the United States of America. Every American family should purchase guns: at least one and better two machine guns and/or automatic weapons or semi-automatic weapons with at least 12,000 rounds of ammunition, at least one and better two handguns with at least 1,200 rounds of ammunition, and at least two and better four military knives, and a kevlar per each family member above 12 years of age. Furthermore, every American should create 8-year food store to be ready to any disruptions of food supply. Every American family should also purchase a separate residence, and if it possesses sufficient funds, at least a hectare of land per each family member. Finally, every American family should put their savings beyond 3- to 6-month salary in cash, in 2/3 into gold and in 1/3 into silver to preserve their savings from run away inflation, which is inevitable, given the scale of money printing in the US and throughout the world. It is lawful for a US citizen to wound and kill a US official, representative, statesman who tries to forcefully confiscate his weapons, bearing neither legal nor moral responsibility, since it is lawful to kill in defense of movable property (Exodus 22:2). In dealing with a US official, representative, statesman who tries to forcefully confiscate weapons, the appropriate way is: resist the devil, and he will flee from you (James 4:7). Finally, it is important for US citizens who have appropriate funds at their disposal to establish a second residence in European states and to purchase property in Europe to be able to flee any federal persecution if such commences.

Presently, in times of significant terrorist threat to public safety in the United States of America and the growing conventional threat to the national defense of the United States of America from the Russian federation as well as from the military alliance of the Russian federation, China and Iran, it is important to allow all US citizens who desire to own and carry personal weapons - military knives, handguns, semi-automatic and automatic rifles, machine guns, grenades, portable grenade launchers - to do so to strengthen the territorial defense of US districts and states as well as the national defense of the United States of America.

It is important for US gun dealers and the national rifle association to hold at least 12 annual gun shows in every US district wherein all US citizens can freely buy, sell and transfer personal weapons - military knives, handguns, semi-automatic and automatic rifles, machine guns, grenades, portable grenade launchers - without any background checks. It is important for every American family, if income and savings allow, to give a personal weapon as a gift to a relative or a friend. It is important for US gun dealers and the national rifle association to reach to disadvantaged minorities residing in the United States of America, to allow US citizens of ethnic, political and religious minority background who desire to own and carry personal weapons to do so, as it is precisely disadvantaged minorities residing in the United States of America who disproportionally suffer from crime, including domestic terrorism, and more guns owned and carried by US citizens of ethnic, political and religious minority background will lead to less crime and less domestic terrorism on the US soil. It is important for American churches and mosques to ensure that American Christians and American muslims fulfill the commandment of Creator God, Lord God Jehovah, Lord Jesus Christ, Holy Spirit, that requires every worshiper of Lord God Jehovah and every worshiper of Lord Jesus Christ in particular, and every man and every woman in general to own and carry a personal weapon for self-defense purposes (Book of Enoch, section 17, chapter 90; St. Luke 22:36).

It is important for US gun manufacturers, US gun dealers and the national rifle association to establish at least ten personal weapon stores in every US district, selling personal weapons - military knives, handguns, semi-automatic and automatic rifles, machine guns, grenades, portable grenade launchers – to US citizens and residents. It is important for the US national rifle association to establish sufficient numbers of shootings ranges, marksmen schools and firearms training courses in every US district to teach US citizens and residents to handle their personal weapons.

Some people strangely oppose to US citizens taking responsible measures to protect their future and the future of their families, advising to focus on restoration of American liberty instead. Yet personal preparedness does not contradict taking collective actions to restore American liberty: in fact individual preparedness serves as a basis of taking collective actions to restore American liberty.

Subsequently, it is necessary to organize an effective lobbying effort against any attempts to ratify the UN arms trade treaty and to pass so-called gun control laws in the US Congress and the legislatures of US states. The NRA and the Republican party should use the ATT as an opportunity to educate US citizens about the fallacies of gun control, and to seek reversal of the existing unlawful statutes restricting the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms in the US Congress, the congresses of US states, and in US courts. It is also important for the NRA to conduct a public relations campaign to illustrate how wide availability of guns and respect for the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms reduces crime in the republican nations as Switzerland, how they make a republican nation prepared to resist foreign aggression, and liberate nations as in the case of free Libya, unjustly defamed by some in the US Congress.

It is also important for the NRA and the Republican party to reject any legislation in the US congress, US state congresses and US district councils, mandating so-called universal background checks, as only background checks carried out by professional gun dealers have a reasonable chance to prevent sales of personal weapons to convicted felons, who committed a felony, criminal in character, and not criminalized civil or political conduct, and criminally insane individuals, who were institutionalized by decisions of US courts as a punishment for committing a felony, criminal in character, and not criminalized civil or political conduct, who were not recognized as US citizens in saner times. It is important for the NRA and the Republican party to organize an effective legal and political effort to repeal any legislation in the US state congresses and US district councils, mandating so-called universal background checks wherever such legislation exist, as such legislation is unconstitutional, unlawful and groundless, given that only background checks carried out by professional gun dealers have a reasonable chance to prevent sales of personal weapons to convicted felons, who committed a felony, criminal in character, and not criminalized civil or political conduct, and criminally insane individuals, who were institutionalized by decisions of US courts as a punishment for committing a felony, criminal in character, and not criminalized civil or political conduct, who were not recognized as US citizens in saner times. It is lawful for US citizens and residents to freely buy, sell and transfer personal weapons - military knives, handguns, semi-automatic and automatic rifles, machine guns, grenades, portable grenade launchers, portable missile launchers, portable anti-aircraft missiles, portable anti-tank missiles, portable naval missiles - and appropriate munitions in accordance with the derivative-natural right to economic freedom, without carrying back ground checks, bearing neither legal nor moral responsibility for this.

Furthermore, it is important for US citizens to disobey any executive orders of the US president, unlawfully restraining the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms. US citizens should also disobey any state law requiring registration, confiscation or prohibition of firearms, since registration of firearms is unlawful under the 2nd amendment to the US constitution. US citizens should also continue the fight in the US court system against any unlawful laws passed by state legislatures. If any law restricting the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms is passed by the US Congress, any executive order restricting the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms is made by the president of the United States, or any judgment of the US supreme court restricting the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms is made, specifically mandating registration, confiscation or prohibition of firearms, US citizens should not comply with the above-mentioned provisions, and the governors and legislatures of the US states should nullify the above-mentioned provisions in the territories of their states by state law, stating the provisions of the 2nd and 10th amendments to the US constitution as basis for nullification. It is important to gradually discard the faulty reasoning that federal law is always superior to state law: in fact, state law, made subject to its reserved powers and the constitution of the United States, can and should be superior to federal law if it does not exceed state power and is not contrary to the US constitution. Such state law in such circumstances is legitimate exercise of state authority to prevent federal usurpation of the rights reserved to the states or the people.

Similarly, if a state law restricting the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms is passed by a state legislature, specifically mandating registration, confiscation or prohibition of firearms, US citizens should not comply with the provisions of such a state law, and legislatures of state districts should nullify the above-mentioned provisions of a state law in the territories of their districts by a district law, stating the provisions of the 2nd, 10th and 14th amendments to the US constitution as basis for nullification. In such a case, a district law, made subject to the reserved powers of the people and the constitution of the United States, can and should be superior to a state law if it does not exceed district power, is made to protect the civil rights of the citizens of the United States and is not contrary to the US constitution. Such a district law in such circumstances is legitimate exercise of district authority to prevent state usurpation of the rights reserved to the people by the bill of rights.

Furthermore, if a particular district law or an act, restricting the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms, is passed in a district, specifically mandating registration, confiscation or prohibition of firearms, US citizens should not comply with the provisions of such a law or an act, state legislature should abolish the district law by the state law, preventing an unconstitutional district law from entering into legal force. Alternatively, such a law should be challenged in a state or federal court to prevent it from entering into legal force.

Finally, if an international treaty is signed by the US president, restricting the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms, specifically mandating registration, confiscation or prohibition of firearms, such a treaty is invalid from its signing date, being contrary to the provisions of the US constitution, which are always superior to international treaties, the US senate should not ratify such a treaty, the US supreme court should strike down the provisions of such a treaty, US states should nullify such a treaty, and US citizens should not comply with the provisions of such a treaty.

What should discontent citizens, who do not want to possess a firearm and want to live in a community without private firearms ownership, do? First, they can collectively purchase land and establish gated communities on private land, where firearms ownership can be temporarily restricted through voluntary agreements between the community and land owners or tenants, provided in a district wherein such a community is established there is a place wherein the civil right guaranteed by the 2nd amendment to the US constitution is fully respected. Such a community can hire a private security firm or invite state law enforcement to provide law enforcement services to the community. Alternatively, discontent citizens can lobby for a constitutional amendment reflecting their political ideas, although, given the popularity of firearms in the American society, such an amendment is unlikely to be passed. Thus, those Americans who do not want to live with firearms are free to do so, both individually and collectively, as well as to peacefully advocate their political views: they should not, however, conspire to interfere with the constitutional rights of other American citizens through unlawful executive, legislative, or court acts, or through unconstitutional international agreements.
fdtwain is offline  
Old April 19th, 2016, 12:42 AM   #43
Banned
 
fdtwain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Europe
Posts: 618
Yet the threat of civilian disarmament in the United States under the obama administration is real. For this reason, important measures should be taken by republican, conservative, nationalist, patriotic, fundamentalist and White US citizens to secure their constitutional rights.

Firstly, the self-defense militias of the American people should be formed in all US states and districts. These militias should work independently or in association with the NRA and/or as a part of the US national guard to protect Christian faith and the Law of the Lord, customs and traditions of the American people, and the natural, derivative-natural, civil and traditional rights of US citizens and residents as well as the rights and authority of US states and districts against federal usurpation or foreign aggression. The federal, state and district government should not harass the activists of the self-defense militias of the American people or try to disarm or dismantle the self-defense militias of the American people. The self-defense militias of the American people should concentrate on identifying and reporting criminals and illegal immigrants in their communities, assisting the national guard of the borderline US states to protect the US border, and preparing and training to resist federal usurpation or foreign aggression. State governors should facilitate the activities of the self-defense militias of the American people in their state by promoting law enforcement training and military training for militia members in association with members of the US national guard and the state police. The governors of US states should also develop contingency plans for the national guard of a US state to replace US army units for defense of their respective states, and should be ready to order the national guard of their respective states to resist any unconstitutional federal executive orders, laws or court decisions. In each US state two brigades of the US national guard, 10,000 US national guardsmen in each brigade, 20,000 US national guardsmen in each US state, shall swiftly be organized, trained and armed, given the growing conventional threat to the national defense of the United States of America from the Russian federation, as well as from the military alliance of the Russian federation, China and Iran, if such a military alliance is established.

Secondly, judging Christian churches should be established in every US district and a judging church should establish a Christian religious court in every US district. A Christian religious court should judge all civil cases with the value of disputed property, not exceeding the market value of 14,700 ounces of silver if both sides of the case agree to the judgment. Furthermore, a judging Christian church should register births, deaths and marriages, and should justify Christians who kill in the following circumstances in accordance with the judgments of Lord God Jehovah, Lord Jesus Christ, Holy Spirit, bearing neither legal nor moral responsibility:

- it is lawful to take property, wound and kill those who commit the abominable deeds of sexual perversions (homosexuality (Leviticus 20:13), lesbianism (Leviticus 20:13), bestiality (Leviticus 20:15), incest (Leviticus 20:11-17), pedophilia (sexual relations with girls below 12 years of age) (Leviticus 20:2-3, Matthew 18:6)), abominations (child murders (abortions) (Leviticus 20:2-3, Exodus 21:22-25), change of gender (Book of Enoch section XVII, chapter 86; section II, chapter 10), cannibalism (Book of Enoch, section II, chapter 7,10), human cloning (Book of Enoch, section XVII, chapter 86; section II, chapter 10)), intentional murder (Exodus 21:14), enslavement of men/women (Exodus 21:16) or selling of men/women to slavery (Exodus 21:16);
- it is lawful to wound and kill in defense of life (Exodus 21:14), liberty (Exodus 21:16), movable property, land up to 100 hectares per man/family and real estate upon such land (Exodus 22:2), dignity from rape, which in its nature is enslavement (Exodus 21:16) and physical assault, which in its nature is attempted murder (Exodus 21:14);
- it is lawful for a US citizen to warn a foreign citizen, or a non-citizen, not born in the territory of the USA, to leave the territory of the USA, and if such a foreign citizen or a non-citizen does not leave on his or her own, subsequently forcefully repatriate such a foreign citizen or a non-citizen (Exodus 23:4). If such a foreign citizen resists repatriation, it is lawful to take property, wound and kill such a foreign citizen or a non-citizen, for such came to steal, kill and destroy (John 10:1,10; Exodus 21:14; Exodus 22:2);
- it is lawful for a US citizen to warn a foreign armed soldier to leave the territory of the USA, and if such an armed foreign soldier does not leave on his own, it is lawful to take property, wound and kill such a foreign armed soldier, he is an enslaver (Exodus 21:16);
- it is lawful for a US citizen(s) to take property, wound and kill soldiers of aggressive foreign nations and their armed collaborators in a war against foreign aggression until just peace is established, those who initiated an aggressive war punished, and the territorial integrity of the states against which an aggressive war was waged is restored (Exodus 17:14,16, I Samuel 15:3);
- it is lawful to wound and kill a government official who takes children from parents for the cause other than infliction of physical disability or engaging a child into prostitution or production of pornography - he is an enslaver (Exodus 21:16);
- it is lawful to wound and kill those who forcefully impose electronic numbers for taxpayers and social security identification, forcefully impose any marks, numbers, writings, microchips upon human skin or inside a human body for any reason, forcefully collect and store biometric information, as fingerprints, eye scan, DNA-samples, without a written court order supported by clear and compelling evidence, sufficient to accuse of felony a person from whom biometric evidence is collected - such are enslavers (Exodus 21:16);
- it is lawful to wound and kill a man-god and his followers who force men to worship him as god and forcefully impose any marks, numbers, writings, microchips upon human skin or inside a human body for any reason (Revelation 19:20-21);
- it is lawful to wound and kill a government official, who arrests, imprisons, condemns to forced labor, condemns to forced medical treatment, wounds or kills in retaliation of exercise of the derivative-natural rights to absolute freedom of speech, freedom of peaceful assembly and association, freedom of Christian religion, the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and keep and bear arms - such is an enslaver (Exodus 21:16);
- it is lawful for a husband or a wife who has committed no adultery to wound and kill a wife or husband who has committed adultery (Leviticus 20:10).

A judging Christian church shall absolve the US citizens and residents who kill in the aforementioned circumstances of any legal or moral responsibility for their just deeds by an act of remission of sins. Furthermore, a judging Christian church shall begin to compile the lists of US citizens and residents, residing in a district, who committed the abominable deeds of sexual perversions (homosexuality, lesbianism, bestiality, incest, pedophilia (sexual relations with girls below 12 years of age)), abominations (child murders (abortions), change of gender, cannibalism, human cloning), intentional murder, enslavement of men/women or selling of men/women to slavery, and to put such lists to the internet for faithful Christians to avoid dealing with the doers of the abominable deeds.

Christian churches in US districts should promote home schooling for European (White) and Christian children, by establishing websites with home schooling resources in association with HSLDA, and should establish at least one Christian non-government liberal art academy providing classical education, a Christian non-government trade academy teaching business trades and professions, and a Christian non-government technical college teaching technical sciences in each US district. These educational institutions should award their own qualifications, not certified by the state or certification agencies, and should specifically require its staff and students to be Christians.

Christian churches in US districts should establish at least one Christian charitable medical clinic in each US district, providing preventative medical care and basic medical care to patients on the basis of ability to pay and independent of US insurance schemes. This medical clinic should specifically require its staff and students to be Christians.

Christian churches in US districts and states should establish citizens’ district and state councils by electing two competent and moral representatives from each Christian church to the district council for the term of one year, and two competent and moral representatives from each district council to a state council for the term of two years. Each district and state council, in association with appropriate non-government organizations, should monitor and report the legal acts of the US government, infringing upon the natural rights, derivative-natural rights, civil rights, traditional rights of the citizens and residents of the United States, the rights and authority of the US districts and states.

Specifically, citizens’ district and state councils should focus on:

- lobbying US state governments to issue gold and silver coins and bullion, and passing legal tender laws authorizing gold and silver coins and bullion as legal tender in the territory of each state, valued at current market price expressed in US dollars;
- lobbying US state governments and the US federal government to repatriate all illegal immigrants from the territory of the United States, and to construct an appropriate fence on the US-Mexico border to eliminate long-term unemployment in the United States, largely caused by mass illegal immigration;
- lobbying the US federal government not to pass the so-called trans-pacific partnership trade agreement, to dissolve the NAFTA trade agreement, to focus on admitting Canadian provinces to the United States of America as new US states, as well as on enlarging the borders of the United States of America with 1/6 of the territory of the Arctic;
- repealing all existing legal statutes infringing upon the derivative-natural rights to absolute freedom of speech, freedom of peaceful assembly and association, freedom of Christian religion, the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and keep and bear arms, the other civil rights of US citizens, districts and states guaranteed by the Bill of Rights;
- prohibiting by state and federal law and preferably by constitutional amendments to the state constitutions and the US constitution, forceful imposition of electronic numbers for taxpayers and social security identification, forceful imposition of any marks, numbers, writings, microchips upon human skin or inside a human body for any reason, forceful collection and storage of biometric information, as fingerprints, eye scan, DNA-samples, without a written court order supported by clear and compelling evidence, sufficient to accuse of felony a person from whom biometric evidence is collected;
- establishing the death penalty in all cases in US federal and state law as punishment of the doers of the abominable deeds of sexual perversions (homosexuality, lesbianism, bestiality, incest, pedophilia (sexual relations with girls below 12 years of age)), abominations (child murders (abortions), change of gender, cannibalism, human cloning), intentional murder, enslavement of men/women or selling of men/women to slavery, and absolving by US federal and state law from legal responsibility those who take property, wound and kill the doers of the abominable deeds of sexual perversions (homosexuality, lesbianism, bestiality, incest, pedophilia (sexual relations with girls below 12 years of age)), abominations (child murders (abortions), change of gender, cannibalism, human cloning), intentional murder, enslavement of men/women or selling of men/women to slavery;
- lobbying the US federal government to strengthen NATO and to admit Australia and New Zealand as NATO members if these nations wish so;
- establishing the US foreign policy on the basis of US exceptionalism and the Monroe doctrine, making the US neither an imperial nation, nor a part of the global government, but the first-class regional great power preserving its exclusive interests in Latin America and NATO military alliance, and building relations with all other nations on the basis of bilateral mutually beneficial peaceful cooperation, promoting regional economic integration, rather than global government or global governance schemes;
- promotion of restoration of the United States of America to its European (White), Christian and republican roots, and peaceful repatriation of the US citizens and residents of non-White ethnicity back to their respective nations or third nations wherein those US citizens and residents can play a positive role in promoting political rights and freedoms and economic development;
- cooperating with the US Republican party to nominate competent and moral candidates to all district, state and federal government positions throughout the United States to provide economically and politically sound policy alternatives to the American people, consistent with Christian faith and the Law of the Lord, customs and traditions of the American people, natural rights, derivative-natural rights, civil rights and traditional rights of US citizens and residents;
- cooperating with the US Republican party to propose to the US Congress a realistic debt restructuring and debt repayment plan as well as appropriate reduction in US federal spending;
- cooperating with the US Republican party to propose to the US Congress a realistic taxation reduction plan to gradually reduce federal taxes to 10% income tax, 10% social tax, and 10% customs tariff, with the exclusion of all other taxes as US national debt is progressively paid;
- cooperating with the US Republican party to reduce the scope of the US federal government and gradually restore to the states, districts and the American people the rights reserved to them by the 10th amendment to the US constitution;
- promotion of establishment of small and medium-sized American businesses hiring American citizens and producing goods on the US soil in association with appropriate non-government organizations and financial institutions.

How should an American citizen react to any gun confiscation scheme, either district, state, federal or international? An American citizen should at least shut himself in his house and prepare to shoot any enforcers of an unconstitutional gun confiscation scheme, justly killing in defense of his property - the blood of such enforcers is upon them. An American citizen should fight such enforcers to the last men, woman and child of his family, to victory or death, leaving such enforcers scorched earth instead of plunder, and should remember what judeo-bolsheviks did to the Russians, who foolishly permitted themselves to be disarmed, arresting and torturing them. Thus it is better to die free, fighting in dignity than to be tortured by such enforcers, who routinely permit their inmates to be raped by negroes and other non-Whites, loosing dignity, for the worst such enforcers can do to dead bodies is to violate them, as US soldiers regularly do to dead Taliban freedom fighters and other dead enemies. Those American citizens who are able should serve in the self-defense militias of the American people, hunt and shoot down such enforcers of an unconstitutional gun confiscation scheme, and furthermore be prepared to hunt and shoot down all doers of the abominable deeds of sexual perversions (homosexuality, lesbianism, bestiality, incest, pedophilia (sexual relations with girls below 12 years of age)), abominations (child murders (abortions), change of gender, cannibalism, human cloning), intentional murder, enslavement of men/women or selling of men/women to slavery in their districts and states, eradicating filth from the US soil, who bring degeneration and trouble, and should repatriate jews and non-Whites from the United States of America to their nations or third countries. District and state councils should coordinate the activities of the self-defense militias of the American people in resistance to gun confiscation schemes, together with patriotic district and state governments and the US national guard until the US soil is liberated and a gun confiscation scheme repealed. Subsequently, the US federal government should be restructured, reelected and reappointed, all unconstitutional legislation repealed and American liberty restored.

Thus, US nationalists, patriots, republicans, conservatives, fundamentalists and European (White) men and women will successfully resist any gun registration, prohibition, or confiscation scheme proposed by the obama administration and coalition of zionists, masons, democrats, communists, socialists and coloreds that support it. And US nationalists, patriots, republicans, conservatives, fundamentalists and European (White) men and women will defend American liberty with firearms to the death, keeping their firearms in defiance of the UN arms trade treaty and any US gun-control law in their cold dead hands if necessary.
fdtwain is offline  
Old April 19th, 2016, 08:02 PM   #44
Banned
 
fdtwain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Europe
Posts: 618
More guns, less crime and less domestic terrorism

The domestic terrorist attack upon the Inland Regional Center in San Bernardino once again demonstrated that economizing on reasonable public safety measures leads to loss of precious American lives. The Inland Regional Center in San Bernardino, a facility for the mentally unstable and weak Americans, was a gun free zone without a panic room installed on every floor, and without two or three armed American policemen or two or three armed American security guards guarding it, making it an easy target for domestic terrorists.

It is obvious that those who voluntarily choose to reside in a gun free zone should at least install a panic room with bulletproof glass on every floor and should hire two or three armed American policemen or two or three armed American security guards guarding it, or otherwise should not be surprised to become a target for domestic terrorists or criminals of various sorts as it happened with the Inland Regional Center in San Bernardino

Two particular domestic terrorists who carried out mass murder in the Inland Regional Center in San Bernardino have no connection to islamic faith and sharia law: in fact, sharia law imposes the death sentence in all cases upon murderers of civilians for no objective reasons (Genesis 9:1-7, Exodus 21:14, Leviticus 18:24-30, Numbers 35:19, Matthew 5:18, Revelation 13:10, Revelation 21: They pretended to be devout muslims, but American police files are filled with stories of domestic terrorists who pretended to be devout Christians and subsequently killed whores and pornowhores without any objective reason. These two particular domestic terrorists have no motive, which is not surprising at all: terrorists whether domestic or foreign kill civilians for no objective reason whatsoever, out of sheer desire to kill as many men and women as possible, and that is why terrorists whether domestic or foreign are not negotiated with, but either executed outright without a trial, in accordance with the commandment of God (Genesis 9:1-7, Exodus 21:14, Leviticus 18:24-30, Numbers 35:19, Matthew 5:18, Revelation 13:10, Revelation 21:, or swiftly tried, sentenced to death and executed, in accordance with the commandment of God (Genesis 9:1-7, Exodus 21:14, Leviticus 18:24-30, Numbers 35:19, Matthew 5:18, Revelation 13:10, Revelation 21:. Their choice of the target is also not surprising - a facility for the mentally unstable and weak Americans, a gun free zone without a panic room installed on every floor and without two or three armed American policemen or two or three armed American security guards guarding it - was an ideal target for domestic terrorists seeking to kill as many men and women as possible.

Was it possible to prevent the domestic terrorist attack upon the Inland Regional Center in San Bernardino? The answer is negative: both domestic terrorists passed background checks and purchased their personal weapons legally. It is obvious that so-called universal background checks or anti-terrorist lists of the US federal government would not have prevented the terrorist attack upon the Inland Regional Center in San Bernardino: these two domestic terrorists obtained their personal weapons legally and would have obtained their personal weapons legally in any case. Importantly, many foreign and domestic terrorists and criminals obtain their personal weapons from black arms markets that are well supplied with foreign made weapons imported to the US, or US made weapons stolen from lawful owners, US military and law enforcement weapons stores, who are not affected by gun-control laws.

Was it possible to limit the damage from the domestic terrorist attack upon the Inland Regional Center in San Bernardino? The answer is positive: if a panic room with bullet proof glass was installed on every floor of the Inland Regional Center in San Bernardino, and two or three armed American policemen, or two or three armed American security guards were guarding it, these two domestic terrorists would have killed no more than four persons in total, and ten Americans would have been alive. Regrettably, the Inland Regional Center in San Bernardino chose to save money on reasonable public safety measures at the expense of precious American lives and was unprepared for the domestic terrorist attack.

What is reasonable and feasible to do with regard to the domestic terrorist attack upon the Inland Regional Center in San Bernardino?

It is important for district and state governments of US districts and states, if district and state tax revenues allow it, to consider funding a part of the costs of installation of panic rooms with bulletproof windows on every floor of every public building in their respective territory that is willing to install a panic room on every floor. Similarly, it is important for US commercial banks, if it is reasonable and feasible for them to do so, to offer low interest loans to public and private corporations and companies for the purposes of installation of a panic room with bulletproof windows on every floor of every US public building that is willing to install a panic room on every floor. Panic rooms are expensive but do save precious American lives from domestic and foreign terrorist attacks.

It is important for retired American soldiers and policemen to establish private investigation agencies and private security agencies in their respective US districts and offer their services with appropriate discounts to public and private corporations and companies, so that every US public building that is willing to employ security guards may employ two or three armed uniform US policemen, or two or three armed American private investigators, or two or three armed American security guards. Doing this will limit the number of victims of a terrorist attack to one or two victims at most per terrorist.

Furthermore, contrary to false claims, gun control laws would not have prevented a domestic or foreign terrorist attack upon the Inland Regional Center in San Bernardino, and, in fact, increase the number of victims from domestic or foreign terrorist attacks, including the domestic terrorist attack upon the Inland Regional Center in San Bernardino, as disarmed civilian population is unable to resist well armed domestic or foreign terrorists, as it recently happened in France. Reportedly, California has unconstitutional, unlawful and groundless restrictions upon certain types of machine guns, automatic rifles, semi-automatic rifles and so-called large capacity magazines that make it harder for US citizens residing in California to purchase personal weapons for self-defense purposes, which need to be abolished: it is important for US citizens residing in California to support the republican party and the national rifle association in repealing these unconstitutional, unlawful and groundless restrictions upon certain types of machine guns, automatic rifles, semi-automatic rifles and so-called large capacity magazines in Californian state legislature, Californian district councils and Californian state and US federal courts. It is obvious to every reasonable man and woman that if one or two American citizens carrying automatic or semi-automatic handguns with large capacity magazines and/or enrolled in the Californian national guard were in proximity of the Inland Regional Center in San Bernardino, the domestic terrorists may well have killed significantly fewer victims.

In fact, making it harder for law abiding American citizens to purchase personal weapons not only increases crime, including domestic terrorism, as American classical scientist Trent Lott has statistically proven for all states, nations and peoples beyond reasonable doubt, but adversely affects the territorial defense of the territory of US states and districts and the national defense of the United States of America in times of the growing foreign terrorist threat and the growing threat to the national defense of the United States of America from the Russian federation, or the military alliance of the Russian federation, China and Iran if such an alliance is created. In fact, it is armed US citizenry that forms the first line of defense against foreign and domestic terrorism, confronting domestic and foreign terrorists and limiting the number of their victims to no more than one or two per terrorist.

It is important not to become emotional with regard to domestic or foreign terrorist attacks as the supporters of gun control laws are: most of these terrorist attacks happen in gun free zones without reasonable public safety measures, with those in charge economizing on reasonable public safety measures at the expense of precious American lives. It is true of course that even with reasonable public safety measures taken, domestic and foreign terrorist attacks will happen albeit with significantly reduced numbers of victims, no more than one or two victims per terrorist, these attacks, however, are a reasonable price for living in a free society, worthy to be paid by every reasonable man and every reasonable woman: the tree of liberty has to be washed from time to time with the blood of tyrants and patriots, and those who trade freedom for security, deserve neither and will get none. It is also important to make it clear to domestic and foreign terrorists that they have not intimidated the United States of America and the American people, they cannot intimidate the United States of America and the American people and they will not intimidate the United States of America and the American people by whatever they do, even by nuclear terrorism.

Some lament the fact that mass shootings became a common occurrence in American life. These forget to mention that mass stabbings and mass poisonings are the selfsame occurrence in European and Asian life, bringing far more suffering and far more painful death to the victims of such attacks: guns do not kill people, evil men and women do whether by shooting, stabbing or poisoning.

In fact, those who lament the fact that mass shootings became a common occurrence in American life are well advised to support establishment in US federal and state laws of the death penalty as a punishment in all cases upon all terrorists who intentionally murder two or more civilians for no objective reason, as required by the commandment of God (Genesis 9:1-7, Exodus 21:14, Leviticus 18:24-30, Numbers 35:19, Matthew 5:18, Revelation 13:10, Revelation 21:.

Furthermore, those who lament the fact that mass shootings became a common occurrence in American life are well advised to carry out a reasonable public effort aimed at prohibition of organized whoredom and organized porno whoredom in US districts and states as well as at establishment of reasonable anti-drug, anti-alcohol and anti-tobacco treatment programs for drug addicts, drunkards and smokers in US districts and states, for such men and women beget mentally unstable children prone to violence, crime and terrorism.

It is important for US republican senators and representatives to reject any and all additional gun-control laws in the US Congress, as such gun-control laws unconstitutionally, unlawfully and groundlessly infringe upon the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms of US citizens and residents, recognized and protected in the second amendment to the US constitution, and largely make it harder for law-abiding US citizens and residents to purchase personal weapons for self-defense purposes and territorial defense purposes, turning US citizens and residents into easy prey for domestic and foreign criminals and terrorists. It is important for the republican party and the national rifle association to swiftly draft and present to the US Congress appropriate legislation removing all US federal law restriction upon ownership and carry of personal weapons - military knives, handguns, semi-automatic and automatic rifles, machine guns, grenades, portable grenade launchers – by US citizens and residents to be debated, accepted or rejected by the US Congress, as this reasonable territorial defense measure and reasonable national defense measure are essential for the purposes of strengthening the territorial defense of US districts and states and strengthening of the national defense of the United States of America in times of a growing terrorist threat, growing foreign terrorist threat and a growing threat to the national defense of the United States of America from the Russian federation, or the military alliance of the Russian federation, China and Iran if such an alliance is created. It is important for the republican party and the national rifle association to swiftly draft and present to the US Congress appropriate legislation requiring US states to honor concealed carry permits issued by any and all other US states, as this reasonable public safety measure is likely to reduce felony crime as well as to reduce the number of victims of mass shootings and the number of victims of domestic terrorist attacks in the United States of America.

It is important for US citizens and residents and for the national rifle association to contact their respective US senators and US representatives, politely expressing their opposition to any and all additional gun-control laws submitted to the United States Congress, as such gun-control laws unconstitutionally, unlawfully and groundlessly infringe upon the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms of US citizens and residents, recognized and protected in the second amendment to the US constitution, and largely make it harder for law-abiding US citizens and residents to purchase personal weapons for self-defense purposes and territorial defense purposes, turning US citizens and residents into easy prey for domestic and foreign criminals and terrorists.

It is important for US gun dealers and the national rifle association to reach to physically disabled US citizens who are willing and able to own and carry personal weapons and to offer reasonable discounts for purchases of suitable personal weapons to these physically disabled US citizens who often become victims of crime and domestic terrorism. Reportedly, a new gun TV channel dedicated to sales of personal weapons to US citizens and residents begins to broadcast in the United States of America: it is important for this new gun TV channel to establish a weekly one hour show for physically disabled US citizens, marketing suitable personal weapons for self-defense purposes to these physically disabled US citizens who often become victims of crime and domestic terrorism.

How should a US citizen react to this siren song of gun control and civilian disarmament, peddled by some democrats? It is important for each US citizen in these perilous times to purchase an additional machine gun with 12,000 rounds of ammunition, or an automatic rifle with 12,000 rounds of ammunition, or a semiautomatic rifle with 12,000 rounds of ammunition, or a handgun with 1,200 rounds of ammunition for himself and his family until there are two machine guns with 12,000 rounds of ammunition each, or two automatic rifles with 12,000 rounds of ammunition each, or two semiautomatic rifles with 12,000 rounds of ammunition each, two handguns with 1,200 rounds of ammunition each, four military knives and a kevlar per each family member above 12 years of age, as well as to purchase and to give a firearm as a gift to his or her relative or a friend if his or her income and savings allow. US citizens and residents should clearly understand and always remember that more personal weapons owned by private US citizens and residents equal less crimes and less domestic terrorism.
fdtwain is offline  
Old April 19th, 2016, 08:04 PM   #45
Banned
 
fdtwain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Europe
Posts: 618
Resisting obama administration executive order

Reportedly, the obama administration intends to issue an executive order establishing unconstitutional, unlawful and groundless restrictions upon the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms of US citizens and residents, recognized and protected in the second amendment to the US constitution, which is without legal effect from the date of signing, exceeding the constitutional powers of US presidency and the US executive branch and being in violation of the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms of US citizens and residents, recognized and protected in the second amendment to the US constitution, and in violation of the tenth amendment to the US constitution.

In fact, the presidency of the United States of America and the US executive branch cannot legislate new US laws, as article 1 section 1 of the US constitution grants all legislative powers to the US congress. In fact, US executive orders are issued by US presidency to ascertain that US laws are faithfully executed, subject to article 2 section 3 of the US constitution, and are binding solely upon employees of the US federal government. Yet the obama administration attempts to unconstitutionally, unlawfully and groundlessly legislate new US laws, establishing unconstitutional, unlawful and groundless restrictions upon the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms of US citizens and residents, recognized and protected in the second amendment to the US constitution, thereby exceeding the constitutional powers of US presidency and the US executive branch and usurping the legislative powers of the US congress.

In particular, the presidency of the United States of America and the US executive branch cannot require any registration or license from private US citizens engaging in buying or selling personal weapons - military knives, handguns, semi-automatic and automatic rifles, machine guns, grenades, portable grenade launchers, portable missile launchers, portable anti-aircraft missiles, portable anti-tank missiles, portable naval missiles and appropriate munitions and explosives – to private US citizens and residents, that is, for so called private sales of personal weapons, nor require that private US citizens engaging in buying or selling personal weapons - military knives, handguns, semi-automatic and automatic rifles, machine guns, grenades, portable grenade launchers, portable missile launchers, portable anti-aircraft missiles, portable anti-tank missiles, portable naval missiles and appropriate munitions and explosives – carry out background checks of private US citizens and residents to whom they sell their personal weapons, that is, for so called private sales of personal weapons.

In fact, the words of the second amendment to the US constitution recognizing the derivative natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms as a civil right are clear:

“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed”

The second amendment to the US constitution recognizes and protects the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms of citizens of the United States, who keep and bear, buy, sell and transfer personal arms irrespective of purposes - that is, all arms and weapons that can be born by a man, including knives, handguns, semi-automatic and automatic weapons, machine guns, grenades, portable grenade launchers, portable rocket launchers, portable anti-aircraft missiles, portable anti-tank missiles, portable naval missiles, appropriate munitions and explosives. The second amendment to the US constitution does not apply to the advanced weapons that cannot be born by a man as tanks, military aircrafts and helicopters, warships: such weapons are owned collectively by the American people and belong to the US armed forces and the national guard of the US states. The second amendment to the US constitution does not apply to chemical, biological and nuclear weapons of mass destruction: these weapons are owned solely by the US federal government. The second amendment to the US constitution prohibits requirement of any registration or license as a condition for exercise the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms of citizens of the United States, who keep and bear, buy, sell and transfer personal arms irrespective of purposes - that is, all arms and weapons that can be born by a man, including knives, handguns, semi-automatic and automatic weapons, machine guns, grenades, portable grenade launchers, portable rocket launchers, portable anti-aircraft missiles, portable anti-tank missiles, portable naval missiles, appropriate munitions and explosives. Registration with the governments of US states can be required with regard to portable rocket launchers, portable anti-aircraft missiles, portable anti-tank missiles, portable naval missiles to allow an owner of a portable missile launcher, a portable anti-aircraft missile, a portable anti-tank missile, a portable naval missile to be swiftly drafted into the national guard of a US state for the purposes of territorial defense of the territory of a US state. With regard to all other personal weapons, including automatic weapons and machine guns, no restrictions are constitutionally permissible, and any registration requirements are constitutionally prohibited.

US congress, subject to its legislative powers to regulate commerce among US states under article 1 section 8 of the US constitution, required professional US arms dealers engaging in trade in arms and weapons across the borders of US states as their main economic activity to register with the US federal government and to carry out background checks to verify at a database that a purchaser of a personal weapon is not convicted in the court of law of the state of a felony crime, criminal in character, and not criminalized political or civil conduct, and is not recognized by the court of law of the state as criminally insane, having committed a felony crime, criminal in character, and not criminalized political or civil conduct, as the above-mentioned persons were properly and wisely not recognized as US citizens when the US constitution was ratified, and which the above-mentioned professional US arms dealers can reasonably be expected to do successfully.

It is clear that the second amendment to the US constitution and the tenth amendment to the US constitution prohibits the US federal government from regulating, i.e. by requiring any registration or license and/or by compelling any background checks, sales of personal weapons - military knives, handguns, semi-automatic and automatic rifles, machine guns, grenades, portable grenade launchers, portable missile launchers, portable anti-aircraft missiles, portable anti-tank missiles, portable naval missiles and appropriate munitions and explosives - done by private US citizens to private US citizens and residents, that is, for so called private sales of personal weapons, as well as from regulating, i.e. by requiring any registration or license and/or by compelling any background checks, sales of personal weapons - military knives, handguns, semi-automatic and automatic rifles, machine guns, grenades, portable grenade launchers, portable missile launchers, portable anti-aircraft missiles, portable anti-tank missiles, portable naval missiles and appropriate munitions and explosives - done by the US arms dealers that do not sell the above-mentioned personal weapons across the borders of US states or across the borders of US territories.

It is clear that private US citizens that sell personal weapons - military knives, handguns, semi-automatic and automatic rifles, machine guns, grenades, portable grenade launchers, portable missile launchers, portable anti-aircraft missiles, portable anti-tank missiles, portable naval missiles and appropriate munitions and explosives – to private US citizens and residents cannot be reasonably expected to prevent sales of personal weapons to criminals and criminally insane persons. Furthermore, any background check requirements for sales of personal weapons by private US citizens to private US citizens and residents, that is, for so called private sales of personal weapons, cannot reasonably be expected to prevent acquisition of the above-mentioned personal weapons by criminals and criminally insane persons, who get their personal weapons from black markets, which are continuously supplied with the above-mentioned personal weapons imported to the US territory or stolen from US owners, and therefore cannot reasonably be expected to decrease gun violence and increase public safety in the United States of America, the intended purpose of the obama administration executive order.

In fact it has been proven statistically beyond reasonable doubt by American classical scientists, including American classical researcher John Lott, that more personal weapons owned by US citizens and residents leads to fewer crimes committed over time, and, in consequence, to less gun violence and increased public safety in the United States of America: hence sales of personal weapons - military knives, handguns, semi-automatic and automatic rifles, machine guns, grenades, portable grenade launchers, portable missile launchers, portable anti-aircraft missiles, portable anti-tank missiles, portable naval missiles and appropriate munitions and explosives - done by private US citizens to private US citizens and residents, that is, so called private sales of personal weapons, in fact, decrease gun violence and increase public safety in the United States of America.

The restriction upon exercise of a constitutional right of US citizens may be permitted if done to advance objective and compelling state interest of the United States of America employing necessary and the least restrictive means, reasonably expected to achieve its intended purpose, provided a constitutional right of US citizens is preserved and the exercise of a constitutional right of US citizens is not significantly burdened thereby. In fact, the obama administration executive order establishing unconstitutional, unlawful and groundless restrictions upon the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms of US citizens and residents, recognized and protected in the second amendment to the US constitution, in particular, unconstitutionally, unlawfully and groundlessly seeking to regulate, i.e. by requiring any registration or license and/or by compelling any background checks, sales of personal weapons done by private US citizens to private US citizens and residents, that is, for so called private sales of personal weapons, as well as unconstitutionally, unlawfully and groundlessly seeking to regulate, i.e. by requiring any registration or license and/or by compelling any background checks, sales of personal weapons done by the US arms dealers who do not sell the personal weapons across the borders of US states or across the borders of US territories, does not advance any objective and compelling state interest of the United States of America, and its intended means are not necessary and are not the least restrictive means, available to achieve its intended purpose to decrease gun violence and to increase public safety in the United States of America, and cannot be reasonably expected to achieve its intended purpose to decrease gun violence and to increase public safety in the United States of America, as demonstrated above.

Furthermore, committed misdemeanor crimes and objectively defined mental illness per se cannot disqualify a US citizen from exercising his or her civil rights, including the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms, recognized and protected in the second amendment to the US constitution, as such persons were recognized as US citizens in the times when the US constitution was ratified. US federal and state courts may prohibit ownership and carrying of personal weapons to a US citizen, convicted of a felony crime, criminal in character, and not criminalized political or civil conduct, or recognized as criminally insane, having committed a felony crime, criminal in character, and not criminalized political or civil conduct, as a part of the punishment of a felony crime, criminal in character, and not criminalized political or civil conduct, or to a US resident convicted of a felony crime, criminal in character, and not criminalized political or civil conduct, or recognized as criminally insane, having committed a felony crime, criminal in character, and not criminalized political or civil conduct, as a part of the punishment of a felony crime, criminal in character, and not criminalized political or civil conduct, as the above-mentioned persons were not recognized US citizens in the times when the US constitution was ratified. In fact, misdemeanor crimes do not disqualify those US citizens and residents who commit them from exercise of their civil rights, and the large majority of the objectively defined mentally ill US citizens and residents who own and carry personal weapons do not commit crimes and overcome their illness with appropriate medications due to the progress of medicine.

Additionally, US bureau of alcohol, tobacco and firearms is responsible for thousands of felony crimes against US citizens, in particular, burning alive of hundreds of US citizens who belonged to the Branch of David church in Waco, TX, it needs to be swiftly abolished and will eventually be abolished.

Additionally, under the tenth amendment to the US constitution it does not pertain to the obama administration or to the US federal government to fund mental health care: this pertains to US states if adequate state funding is available and US states consider it necessary and proper to do so.

Hence the obama administration executive order establishing unconstitutional, unlawful and groundless restrictions upon the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms of US citizens and residents, recognized and protected in the second amendment to the US constitution, in particular, unconstitutionally, unlawfully and groundlessly seeking to regulate, i.e. by requiring any registration or license and/or by compelling any background checks, sales of personal weapons done by private US citizens to private US citizens and residents, that is, for so called private sales of personal weapons, as well as unconstitutionally, unlawfully and groundlessly seeking to regulate, i.e. by requiring any registration or license and/or by compelling any background checks, sales of personal weapons done by the US arms dealers who do not sell personal weapons across the borders of US states or across the borders of US territories, is without legal effect from the date of signing, exceeding the constitutional powers of US presidency and the US executive branch by usurping legislative powers pertaining to the US congress, and being in violation of the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms of US citizens and residents, recognized and protected in the second amendment to the US constitution, and in violation of the tenth amendment to the US constitution.

US republican representatives and US republican senators shall swiftly draft, submit to both houses of the US congress and pass a joint congressional resolution of both houses of the US congress declaring null, void and without legal effect in its entirety from the date of signing the obama administration executive order establishing unconstitutional, unlawful and groundless restrictions upon the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms of US citizens and residents, recognized and protected in the second amendment to the US constitution, in particular, unconstitutionally, unlawfully and groundlessly seeking to regulate, i.e. by requiring any registration or license and/or by compelling any background checks, sales of personal weapons done by private US citizens to private US citizens and residents, that is, for so called private sales of personal weapons, as well as unconstitutionally, unlawfully and groundlessly seeking to regulate, i.e. by requiring any registration or license and/or by compelling any background checks, sales of personal weapons done by the US arms dealers who do not sell personal weapons across the borders of US states or across the borders of US territories, as exceeding constitutional powers of US presidency and the US executive branch by usurping legislative powers pertaining to the US congress and being in violation of the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms of US citizens and residents, recognized and protected in the second amendment to the US constitution, and in violation of the tenth amendment to the US constitution.

US republican representatives and US republican senators shall not fund the obama administration executive order establishing unconstitutional, unlawful and groundless restrictions upon the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms of US citizens and residents, recognized and protected in the second amendment to the US constitution, in particular, unconstitutionally, unlawfully and groundlessly seeking to regulate, i.e. by requiring any registration or license and/or by compelling any background checks, sales of personal weapons done by private US citizens to private US citizens and residents, that is, for so called private sales of personal weapons, as well as unconstitutionally, unlawfully and groundlessly seeking to regulate, i.e. by requiring any registration or license and/or by compelling any background checks, sales of personal weapons done by the US arms dealers who do not sell personal weapons across the borders of US states or across the borders of US territories. Furthermore, US republican representatives and US republican senators shall completely defund US bureau of alcohol, tobacco and firearms and swiftly abolish US bureau of alcohol, tobacco and firearms as responsible for thousands of felony crimes against US citizens, in particular, burning alive of hundreds of US citizens who belonged to the Branch of David church in Waco, TX, as complaints of US citizens for unconstitutional, unlawful and groundless actions of US bureau of alcohol, tobacco and firearms multiply continuously.

It is important for US republican senators and representatives to reject any and all additional gun-control laws in the US Congress, as such gun-control laws unconstitutionally, unlawfully and groundlessly infringe upon the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms of US citizens and residents, recognized and protected in the second amendment to the US constitution, and largely make it harder for law-abiding US citizens and residents to purchase personal weapons for self-defense purposes and territorial defense purposes, turning US citizens and residents into easy prey for domestic and foreign criminals and terrorists. It is important for the republican party and the national rifle association to swiftly draft and present to the US Congress appropriate legislation removing all US federal law restriction upon ownership and carry of personal weapons - military knives, handguns, semi-automatic and automatic rifles, machine guns, grenades, portable grenade launchers – by US citizens and residents to be debated, accepted or rejected by the US Congress, as this reasonable territorial defense measure and reasonable national defense measure are essential for the purposes of strengthening the territorial defense of US districts and states and strengthening of the national defense of the United States of America in times of a growing terrorist threat, growing foreign terrorist threat and a growing threat to the national defense of the United States of America from the Russian federation, or the military alliance of the Russian federation, China and Iran if such an alliance is created. It is important for the republican party and the national rifle association to swiftly draft and present to the US Congress appropriate legislation requiring US states to honor concealed carry permits issued by any and all other US states, as this reasonable public safety measure is likely to reduce felony crime as well as to reduce the number of victims of mass shootings and the number of victims of domestic terrorist attacks in the United States of America.

It is important for US citizens and residents and for the national rifle association to contact their respective US senators and US representatives, politely expressing their opposition to any and all additional gun-control laws submitted to the US Congress, as such gun-control laws unconstitutionally, unlawfully and groundlessly infringe upon the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms of US citizens and residents, recognized and protected in the second amendment to the US constitution, and largely make it harder for law-abiding US citizens and residents to purchase personal weapons for self-defense purposes and territorial defense purposes, turning US citizens and residents into easy prey for domestic and foreign criminals and terrorists.

The Republican party, NRA and second amendment foundations shall swiftly ask US federal courts to declare unconstitutional, unlawful and groundless the obama administration executive order establishing unconstitutional, unlawful and groundless restrictions upon the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms of US citizens and residents, recognized and protected in the second amendment to the US constitution, in particular, unconstitutionally, unlawfully and groundlessly seeking to regulate, i.e. by requiring any registration or license and/or by compelling any background checks, sales of personal weapons done by private US citizens to private US citizens and residents, that is, for so called private sales of personal weapons, as well as unconstitutionally, unlawfully and groundlessly seeking to regulate, i.e. by requiring any registration or license and/or by compelling any background checks, sales of personal weapons done by the US arms dealers who do not sell personal weapons across the borders of US states or across the borders of US territories, as exceeding constitutional powers of US presidency and the US executive branch by usurping legislative powers pertaining to the US congress and being in violation of the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms of US citizens and residents, recognized and protected in the second amendment to the US constitution, and in violation of the tenth amendment to the US constitution.

It is important for US federal courts to declare unconstitutional, unlawful and groundless the obama administration executive order establishing unconstitutional, unlawful and groundless restrictions upon the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms of US citizens and residents, recognized and protected in the second amendment to the US constitution, in particular, unconstitutionally, unlawfully and groundlessly seeking to regulate, i.e. by requiring any registration or license and/or by compelling any background checks, sales of personal weapons done by private US citizens to private US citizens and residents, that is, for so called private sales of personal weapons, as well as unconstitutionally, unlawfully and groundlessly seeking to regulate, i.e. by requiring any registration or license and/or by compelling any background checks, sales of personal weapons done by the US arms dealers who do not sell personal weapons across the borders of US states or across the borders of US territories, as exceeding constitutional powers of US presidency and the US executive branch by usurping legislative powers pertaining to the US congress and being in violation of the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms of US citizens and residents, recognized and protected in the second amendment to the US constitution, and in violation of the tenth amendment to the US constitution.

The next republican US president shall unsign the obama administration executive order establishing unconstitutional, unlawful and groundless restrictions upon the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms of US citizens and residents, recognized and protected in the second amendment to the US constitution, in particular, unconstitutionally, unlawfully and groundlessly seeking to regulate, i.e. -background checks, sales of personal weapons done by private US citizens to private US citizens and residents, that is, for so called private sales of personal weapons, as well as unconstitutionally, unlawfully and groundlessly seeking to regulate, i.e. by requiring any registration or license and/or by compelling any background checks, sales of personal weapons done by the US arms dealers who do not sell personal weapons across the borders of US states or across the borders of US territories, as exceeding constitutional powers of US presidency and the US executive branch by usurping legislative powers pertaining to the US congress and being in violation of the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms of US citizens and residents, recognized and protected in the second amendment to the US constitution, and in violation of the tenth amendment to the US constitution.

The legislatures of US states shall swiftly draft, submit to both houses of legislatures of US states and pass joint resolutions of both houses of the US congress, declaring null, void and without legal effect in its entirety from the date of signing in the territory of respective US states the obama administration executive order establishing unconstitutional, unlawful and groundless restrictions upon the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms of US citizens and residents, recognized and protected in the second amendment to the US constitution, in particular, unconstitutionally, unlawfully and groundlessly seeking to regulate, i.e. by requiring any registration or license and/or by compelling any background checks, sales of personal weapons done by private US citizens to private US citizens and residents, that is, for so called private sales of personal weapons, as well as unconstitutionally, unlawfully and groundlessly seeking to regulate, i.e. by requiring any registration or license and/or by compelling any background checks, sales of personal weapons done by the US arms dealers who do not sell personal weapons across the borders of US states or across the borders of US territories, as being in violation of the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms of US citizens and residents, recognized and protected in the second amendment to the US constitution, and in violation of the tenth amendment to the US constitution.

US citizens shall follow the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms, recognized and protected in the second amendment to the US constitution and shall not comply with the provisions of the obama administration executive order establishing unconstitutional, unlawful and groundless restrictions upon the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms of US citizens and residents, recognized and protected in the second amendment to the US constitution, in particular, unconstitutionally, unlawfully and groundlessly seeking to regulate, i.e. by requiring any registration or license and/or by compelling any background checks, sales of personal weapons done by private US citizens to private US citizens and residents, that is, for so called private sales of personal weapons, as well as unconstitutionally, unlawfully and groundlessly seeking to regulate, i.e. by requiring any registration or license and/or by compelling any background checks, sales of personal weapons done by the US arms dealers who do not sell personal weapons across the borders of US states or across the borders of US territories, bearing neither legal nor moral responsibility for that.

In particular, it is lawful for US citizens to follow the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms, recognized and protected in the second amendment to the US constitution and to sell personal weapons - military knives, handguns, semi-automatic and automatic rifles, machine guns, grenades, portable grenade launchers, portable missile launchers, portable anti-aircraft missiles, portable anti-tank missiles, portable naval missiles and appropriate munitions and explosives - to private US citizens and residents, engaging in so called private sales of personal weapons, without any registration or license and without carrying any background checks on private US citizens and residents to whom the above-mentioned personal weapons - military knives, handguns, semi-automatic and automatic rifles, machine guns, grenades, portable grenade launchers, portable missile launchers, portable anti-aircraft missiles, portable anti-tank missiles, portable naval missiles and appropriate munitions and explosives – are sold, bearing neither legal nor moral responsibility for that.

In particular, it is lawful for the US arms dealers who do not sell the above-mentioned personal weapons - military knives, handguns, semi-automatic and automatic rifles, machine guns, grenades, portable grenade launchers, portable missile launchers, portable anti-aircraft missiles, portable anti-tank missiles, portable naval missiles and appropriate munitions and explosives - across the borders of US states or across the borders of US territories to follow the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms, recognized and protected in the second amendment to the US constitution and to sell personal weapons - military knives, handguns, semi-automatic and automatic rifles, machine guns, grenades, portable grenade launchers, portable missile launchers, portable anti-aircraft missiles, portable anti-tank missiles, portable naval missiles and appropriate munitions and explosives - to private US citizens and residents, engaging in so called private sales of personal weapons, without any registration or license and without carrying any background checks on private US citizens and residents to whom the above-mentioned personal weapons - military knives, handguns, semi-automatic and automatic rifles, machine guns, grenades, portable grenade launchers, portable missile launchers, portable anti-aircraft missiles, portable anti-tank missiles, portable naval missiles and appropriate munitions and explosives – are sold, bearing neither legal nor moral responsibility for that.

The juries of US citizens shall not convict, fine, arrest, imprison, condemn to forced labor, condemn to forced medical treatment:

- US citizens who follow the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms, recognized and protected in the second amendment to the US constitution and sell personal weapons - military knives, handguns, semi-automatic and automatic rifles, machine guns, grenades, portable grenade launchers, portable missile launchers, portable anti-aircraft missiles, portable anti-tank missiles, portable naval missiles and appropriate munitions and explosives - to private US citizens and residents, engaging in so called private sales of personal weapons, without any registration or license and without carrying any background checks on private US citizens and residents to whom the above-mentioned personal weapons - military knives, handguns, semi-automatic and automatic rifles, machine guns, grenades, portable grenade launchers, portable missile launchers, portable anti-aircraft missiles, portable anti-tank missiles, portable naval missiles and appropriate munitions and explosives – are sold;
- the US arms dealers who do not sell the above-mentioned personal weapons - military knives, handguns, semi-automatic and automatic rifles, machine guns, grenades, portable grenade launchers, portable missile launchers, portable anti-aircraft missiles, portable anti-tank missiles, portable naval missiles and appropriate munitions and explosives - across the borders of US states or across the borders of US territories, who follow the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms, recognized and protected in the second amendment to the US constitution and sell personal weapons - military knives, handguns, semi-automatic and automatic rifles, machine guns, grenades, portable grenade launchers, portable missile launchers, portable anti-aircraft missiles, portable anti-tank missiles, portable naval missiles and appropriate munitions and explosives - to private US citizens and residents, engaging in so called private sales of personal weapons, without any registration or license and without carrying any background checks on private US citizens and residents to whom the above-mentioned personal weapons - military knives, handguns, semi-automatic and automatic rifles, machine guns, grenades, portable grenade launchers, portable missile launchers, portable anti-aircraft missiles, portable anti-tank missiles, portable naval missiles and appropriate munitions and explosives – are sold;

applying jury nullification – power of the jury over both the law and the facts of the case and respecting the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms of US citizens, recognized and protected in the second amendment to the US constitution.

US citizens and residents shall remember that gun registration is gun confiscation.

What should American citizens who support firearms ownership and the second amendment to the US constitution do?

First, it is important to know and understand that the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms is established by God, proceeds from God and is only recognized and protected in the second amendment to the US constitution.

Lord God Jehovah said:

Book of Enoch, Section 17, Chapter 90
And I saw till a great sword was given to the sheep

Lord Jesus Christ said:

Luke 22:36
And he that hath no sword let him sell his garment and buy one

thereby allowing and ordering each worshiper of Lord God Jehovah and each worshiper of Lord Jesus Christ to own a personal weapon.

Luke 22:38 furthermore established that apostles of Lord Jesus Christ had purchased, owned and carried two personal weapons – swords - for themselves and their relatives, ownership and carry of which was prohibited to non-Roman citizens under the penalty of death, thereby legalizing ownership and carry of personal weapons by citizens and residents of any state.

Since all power is given unto Lord Jesus Christ in heaven and on earth (Matthew 28:1 and the earth and heaven shall pass away, but the words of Lord Jesus Christ will not pass away (Matthew 24:35), all American and foreign enemies of the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms of US citizens, recognized and protected in the second amendment to the US constitution, will not prevail, but the actions of all American and foreign enemies of the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms of US citizens, recognized and protected in the second amendment to the US constitution, will only significantly increase the number of personal weapons to be owned and carried by US citizens.

The text of the second amendment to the US constitution is clear:

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

This signifies that a US citizen is allowed to keep and bear, buy, sell and transfer personal weapons that can be kept and carried - military knives, handguns, semi-automatic and automatic rifles, machine guns, grenades, portable grenade launchers, portable missile launchers, portable anti-aircraft missiles, portable anti-tank missiles, portable naval missiles and appropriate munitions and explosives, without any license or registration.

Every American family should purchase guns: at least two machine guns or automatic rifles or semi-automatic rifles with at least 12,000 rounds of ammunition each, at least two handguns with at least 1,200 rounds of ammunition each, at least four military knives and a kevlar per each member of household above 12 years of age. US citizens shall not register their firearms and ammunition as guns registration is gun confiscation, and shall own and carry their personal weapons without fear, following their derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms, recognized and protected in the second amendment to the US constitution. It is important for each US citizen in these perilous times to purchase and give a firearm as a gift to his or her relative or a friend if his or her income and savings allow. US citizens and residents should clearly understand and always remember that more personal weapons owned by private US citizens and residents equal less crimes and less domestic terrorism.

Furthermore, every American should create 8-year food store to be ready to any disruptions of food supply. Every American family should also purchase a separate residence, and if it possesses sufficient funds, at least a hectare of land per each family member, to learn vegetable and fruit gardening and to keep cattle and poultry wherever reasonable. Finally, every American family should sell the stocks of large corporations, presently overvalued at least 3 times through run away inflation - the consequence of FRS money printing - and put their savings beyond 3- to 6-month salary in cash, in 2/3 into gold and in 1/3 into silver to preserve their savings from run away inflation, which is inevitable, given the scale of money printing in the US and throughout the world. It is lawful for a US citizen to wound and kill a US official, representative, statesman who tries to forcefully confiscate his weapons, bearing neither legal nor moral responsibility, since it is lawful to kill in defense of movable property (Exodus 22:2). In dealing with American or foreign enemies, the appropriate way is: resist the devil and he will flee from you (James 4:7). Finally, it is important for US citizens who have appropriate funds at their disposal to establish a second residence in European states and to purchase property in Europe to be able to flee any federal persecution if such commences.

Some people strangely oppose to the US citizens taking responsible measures to protect their future and the future of their families, advising to focus on restoration of American liberty instead. Yet personal preparedness does not contradict taking collective actions to restore American liberty: in fact individual preparedness serves as a basis of taking collective actions to restore American liberty.

Furthermore, self-defense militias of the American people should be formed in all US states and districts. These militias should work independently or in association with the NRA and/or as a part of the US national guard to protect Christian faith and the Law of the Lord, customs and traditions of the American people, and the natural, derivative-natural, civil and traditional rights of US citizens and residents as well as the rights and authority of US states and districts against federal usurpation or foreign aggression. The federal, state and district government should not harass activists of self-defense militias of the American people, or try to disarm or dismantle self-defense militias of the American people. Self-defense militias of the American people should concentrate on identifying and reporting criminals and illegal immigrants in their communities, assisting the national guard of the borderline US states to protect the US border, and preparing and training to resist federal usurpation or foreign aggression. US State governors should facilitate the activities of self-defense militias of the American people in their states by promoting law enforcement training and military training for militia members in association with members of the US national guard and the US state police. The governors of US states should also develop contingency plans for the national guard of a US state to replace US army units for defense of their respective states, and should be ready to order the national guard of their respective states to resist any unconstitutional federal executive orders, laws or court decisions. Each US state shall have at least 20,000 organized, trained and armed US national guardsmen ready to be deployed within the state in 24 hours.

It is necessary to organize an effective lobbying effort against any attempts to ratify the UN arms trade treaty and to pass so-called gun control laws in the US Congress and the legislatures of US states. The NRA and the Republican party should use the ATT as an opportunity to educate US citizens about the fallacies of gun control, and seek reversal of existing unlawful statutes restricting the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms in the US Congress, the congresses of US states, and in US courts. It is also important for the NRA to conduct a public relations campaign to illustrate how wide availability of guns and respect for the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms reduces crime in republican nations as Switzerland, makes a republican nation prepared to resist foreign aggression, and liberates nations as in the case of free Libya, unjustly defamed by some in the US Congress.

It is important for US gun dealers and the national rifle association to reach to physically disabled US citizens who are willing and able to own and carry personal weapons and to offer reasonable discounts for purchases of suitable personal weapons to these physically disabled US citizens, who often become victims of crime and domestic terrorism. Reportedly, a new gun TV channel dedicated to sales of personal weapons to US citizens and residents begins to broadcast in the United States of America: it is important for this new gun TV channel to establish a weekly one hour show for physically disabled US citizens, marketing suitable personal weapons for self-defense purposes to these physically disabled US citizens, who often become victims of crime and domestic terrorism.

Furthermore, it is important for US citizens to disobey any executive orders of the US president, unlawfully restraining the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms. US citizens should also disobey any federal, state or local law requiring registration, confiscation or prohibition of firearms, since registration of firearms is unlawful under the second amendment to the US constitution. US citizens should also continue the fight in the US court system against any unlawful laws passed by state legislatures. If any law restricting the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms is passed by the US Congress, any executive order restricting the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms is made by the president of the United States, or any judgment of the US supreme court restricting the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms is made, specifically mandating registration, confiscation or prohibition of firearms, US citizens should not comply with the above-mentioned provisions, and the governors and legislatures of US states should nullify the above-mentioned provisions in the territories of their states by a state law, stating the provisions of the second and the tenth amendments to the US constitution as basis for nullification. It is important to gradually discard the faulty reasoning that federal law is always superior to state law: in fact, state law, made subject to its reserved powers and the constitution of the United States, can and should be superior to federal law, if it does not exceed state power and is not contrary to the US constitution. Such state law in such circumstances is legitimate exercise of state authority to prevent federal usurpation of the rights reserved to the states or to the people.

Similarly, if a state law restricting the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms is passed by state legislature, specifically mandating registration, confiscation or prohibition of firearms, US citizens should not comply with the provisions of such a state law, and legislatures of state districts should nullify the above-mentioned provisions of a state law in the territories of their districts by a district law, stating the provisions of the second, the tenth and the fourteenth amendments to the US constitution as basis for nullification. In such a case, a district law, made subject to the reserved powers of the people and the constitution of the United States, can and should be superior to a state law, if it does not exceed district power, is made to protect the civil rights of the citizens of the United States and is not contrary to the US constitution. Such a district law in such circumstances is legitimate exercise of district authority to prevent state usurpation of the rights reserved to the people by the Bill of Rights.

Furthermore, if a particular district law or an act, restricting the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms, is passed in a district, specifically mandating registration, confiscation or prohibition of firearms, US citizens should not comply with the provisions of such a law or an act, state legislature should abolish the district law by the state law, preventing an unconstitutional district law from entering into legal force. Alternatively, such a law should be challenged in a state or federal court to prevent it from entering into legal force.

The juries of US citizens shall not convict, fine, arrest, imprison, condemn to forced labor, condemn to forced medical treatment US citizens who possess and carry personal weapons - military knives, handguns, semi-automatic and automatic rifles, machine guns, grenades, portable grenade launchers, portable missile launchers, portable anti-aircraft missiles, portable anti-tank missiles, portable naval missiles - and appropriate munitions, without license or registration, applying jury nullification – power of the jury over both the law and the facts of the case - and respecting the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms of US citizens, recognized and protected in the second amendment to the US constitution, unless such US citizens are prohibited from possession and carrying personal weapons as a punishment for committing a felony crime, criminal in character, and not criminalized civil and political conduct, or declared criminally insane by US courts as a punishment for committing a felony crime, criminal in character, and not criminalized civil and political conduct.

Finally, if an international treaty is signed by the US president, restricting the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms, specifically mandating registration, confiscation or prohibition of firearms, such a treaty is invalid from its signing date, being contrary to the provisions of the US constitution, which are always superior to international treaties, US senate should not ratify such a treaty, US supreme court should strike down the provisions of such a treaty, US states should nullify such a treaty, and US citizens should not comply with the provisions of such a treaty.
fdtwain is offline  
Old April 19th, 2016, 08:04 PM   #46
Banned
 
fdtwain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Europe
Posts: 618
Secondly, judging Christian churches should be established in every US district and a judging church should establish a Christian religious court in every US district. A Christian religious court should judge all civil cases with the value of disputed property not exceeding the market value of 14,700 ounces of silver if both sides of the case agree to the judgment. Furthermore, a judging Christian church should register births, deaths and marriages and should justify Christians who kill in the following circumstances, in accordance with the judgments of Lord God Jehovah, Lord Jesus Christ, Holy Spirit, bearing neither legal nor moral responsibility:

- it is lawful to take property, wound and kill those who commit the abominable deeds of sexual perversions (homosexuality (Leviticus 20:13), lesbianism (Leviticus 20:13), bestiality (Leviticus 20:15), incest (Leviticus 20:11-17), pedophilia (sexual relations with girls below 12 years of age) (Leviticus 20:2-3, Matthew 18:6)), abominations (child murders (abortions) (Leviticus 20:2-3, Exodus 21:22-25), change of gender (Book of Enoch Section XVII, Chapter 86, Section II, Chapter 10), cannibalism (Book of Enoch, Section II, Chapter 7,10), human cloning (Book of Enoch Section XVII, Chapter 86, Section II, Chapter 10)), intentional murder (Exodus 21:14), enslavement of men/women (Exodus 21:16) or selling of men/women to slavery (Exodus 21:16);
- it is lawful to wound and kill in defense of life (Exodus 21:14), liberty (Exodus 21:16), movable property, land up 100 hectares per man/family and real estate upon such land (Exodus 22:2), dignity from rape, which in its nature is enslavement (Exodus 21:16) and physical assault, which in its nature is attempted murder (Exodus 21:14);
- it is lawful for a US citizen to warn a foreign citizen, or a non-citizen, not born in the territory of the USA, to leave the territory of the USA, and if such a foreign citizen or a non-citizen does not leave on his or her own, subsequently forcefully repatriate such a foreign citizen or a non-citizen (Exodus 23:4). If such a foreign citizen resists repatriation, it is lawful to take property, wound and kill such a foreign citizen or a non-citizen, for such came to steal, kill and destroy (John 10:1,10; Exodus 21:14; Exodus 22:2);
- it is lawful for a US citizen to warn a foreign armed soldier to leave the territory of the USA, and if such an armed foreign soldier does not leave on his own, it is lawful to take property, wound and kill such a foreign armed soldier, he is an enslaver (Exodus 21:16);
- it is lawful for a US citizen(s) to take property, wound and kill soldiers of aggressive foreign nations and their armed collaborators in a war against foreign aggression until just peace is established, those who initiated an aggressive war punished, and the territorial integrity of the states against which an aggressive war was waged is restored (Exodus 17:14,16, I Samuel 15:3);
- it is lawful to wound and kill a government official who takes children from parents for the cause other than infliction of a physical disability or engaging a child into prostitution or production of pornography - he is an enslaver (Exodus 21:16);
- it is lawful to wound and kill those who forcefully impose electronic numbers for taxpayers and social security identification, forcefully impose any marks, numbers, writings, microchips upon human skin or inside a human body for any reason, forcefully collect and store biometric information as fingerprints, eye scan, DNA-samples, without a written court order supported by clear and compelling evidence, sufficient to accuse of felony a person from whom biometric evidence is collected - such are enslavers (Exodus 21:16);
- it is lawful to wound and kill a man-god and his followers who force men to worship him as god and forcefully impose any marks, numbers, writings, microchips upon human skin or inside a human body for any reason (Revelation 19:20-21);
- it is lawful to wound and kill a government official who arrests, imprisons, condemns to forced labor, condemns to forced medical treatment, wounds or kills in retaliation of exercise of the derivative-natural rights to absolute freedom of speech, freedom of peaceful assembly and association, freedom of Christian religion, the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and keep and bear arms - such is an enslaver (Exodus 21:16);
- it is lawful for a husband or a wife who has committed no adultery to wound and kill a wife or husband who has committed adultery (Leviticus 20:10).

A judging Christian church shall absolve the US citizens and residents who kill in the aforementioned circumstances of any legal or moral responsibility for their just deeds by an act of remission of sins. Furthermore, a judging Christian church shall begin to compile the lists of US citizens and residents residing in a district who committed the abominable deeds of sexual perversions (homosexuality, lesbianism, bestiality, incest, pedophilia (sexual relations with girls below 12 years of age)), abominations (child murders (abortions), change of gender, cannibalism, human cloning), intentional murder, enslavement of men/women or selling of men/women to slavery, and to put such lists to the internet for faithful Christians to avoid dealing with the doers of the abominable deeds.

Christian churches in US districts should promote home schooling for European (White) and Christian children, by establishing websites with home schooling resources in association with HSLDA and should establish at least one Christian non-government liberal art academy providing classical education, a Christian non-government trade academy teaching business trades and professions, and a Christian non-government technical college teaching technical sciences in each US district. These educational institutions should award their own qualifications, not certified by the state or certification agencies, and should specifically require its staff and students to be Christians.

Christian churches in US districts should establish at least one Christian charitable medical clinic in each US district, providing preventative medical care and basic medical care to patients on the basis of ability to pay and independent of US insurance schemes. This medical clinic should specifically require its staff and students to be Christians and train a sufficient number of midwives.

Christian churches in US districts and US states should establish citizens’ district and state councils, by electing two competent and moral representatives from each Christian church into the district council for the term of one year, and two competent and moral representatives from each district council into a state council for the term of two years. Each district and state council in association with appropriate non-government organizations should monitor and report legal acts of the US government infringing upon the natural rights, derivative-natural rights, civil rights, traditional rights of the citizens and residents of the United States, the rights and authority of US districts and states.

Specifically, citizens’ district and state councils should focus on:

- lobbying state governments to issue gold and silver coins and bullion, and passing legal tender laws authorizing gold and silver coins and bullion as legal tender in the territory of each state, valued at current market price expressed in US dollars;
- lobbying US state governments and the US federal government to repatriate all illegal immigrants from the territory of the United States and construct an appropriate fence on the US-Mexico border to eliminate long-term unemployment in the United States largely caused by mass illegal immigration;
- lobbying the US federal government to dissolve the NAFTA trade agreement and to focus on admitting Canadian provinces to the United States of America as new US states, if Canadian provinces desire this;
- repealing all existing legal statutes infringing upon the derivative-natural rights to absolute freedom of speech, freedom of peaceful assembly and association, freedom of Christian religion, the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and keep and bear arms, other civil rights of US citizens, districts and states, guaranteed by the Bill of Rights. In particular, repealing, together with the national rifle association and the US republican party, all restrictions on ownership and carrying of automatic rifles and machine guns by US citizens;
- prohibiting by state and federal law and preferably by constitutional amendments to the state and the US constitution, forceful imposition of electronic numbers for taxpayers and social security identification, forceful imposition of any marks, numbers, writings, microchips upon human skin or inside a human body for any reason, forceful collection and storage of biometric information as fingerprints, eye scan, DNA-samples, without a written court order supported by clear and compelling evidence, sufficient to accuse of felony a person from whom biometric evidence is collected;
- establishing the death penalty in all cases in US federal and state law as punishment of the doers of the abominable deeds of sexual perversions (homosexuality, lesbianism, bestiality, incest, pedophilia (sexual relations with girls below 12 years of age)), abominations (child murders (abortions), change of gender, cannibalism, human cloning), intentional murder, enslavement of men/women or selling of men/women to slavery, and absolving by US federal and state law from legal responsibility those who take property, wound and kill the doers of the abominable deeds of sexual perversions (homosexuality, lesbianism, bestiality, incest, pedophilia (sexual relations with girls below 12 years of age)), abominations (child murders (abortions), change of gender, cannibalism, human cloning), intentional murder, enslavement of men/women or selling of men/women to slavery;
- lobbying the US federal government to strengthen NATO and to admit Australia and New Zealand as NATO members if these nations wish so;
- establishing US foreign policy on the basis of US exceptionalism, making the US neither an imperial nation nor a part of the global government, but a great first-class regional power preserving its exclusive interests in Latin America and NATO military alliance, and building relations with all other nations on the basis of bilateral mutually beneficial peaceful cooperation, promoting regional economic integration, rather than global government or global governance schemes;
- promotion of restoration of the United States of America to its European (White), Christian and republican roots, and peaceful repatriation of the US citizens and residents of non-White ethnicity back to their respective nations or third nations, wherein those US citizens and residents can play a positive role in promoting political rights and freedoms and economic development;
- cooperating with the US Republican party to nominate competent and moral candidates to all district, state and federal government positions throughout the United States to provide economically and politically sound policy alternatives to the American people, consistent with Christian faith and the Law of the Lord, customs and traditions of the American people and American statecraft, autonomy, self-government, rights and authority of US states, districts and tribes, natural rights, derivative-natural rights, civil rights and traditional rights of US citizens and residents;
- cooperating with the US Republican party to propose to the US Congress a realistic debt restructuring and debt repayment plan as well as appropriate reduction in US federal spending;
- cooperating with the US Republican party to propose to the US Congress a realistic taxation reduction plan to gradually reduce federal taxes to 10% income tax, 10% social tax, and 10% customs tariff with the exclusion of all other taxes as US national debt is progressively paid;
- cooperating with the US Republican party to reduce the scope of the US federal government and gradually restore to states, districts and the American people the rights reserved to them by the 10th amendment to the US constitution;
- promotion of establishment of small and medium-sized American businesses hiring American citizens and producing goods on US soil in association with appropriate non-government organizations and financial institutions.

Repatriating illegal immigrants from the United States of America it is important not to treat illegal immigrants inhumanely. For example, the recent influx of illegal minors into the United States of America requires a reasonable approach. It is clear that illegal minors cannot stay in the United States of America, yet the repatriation cases of illegal minors shall be processed within one year, while illegal minors shall be adequately fed, clothed and housed, given one time grant of 1,000 USD on repatriation from the United States of America and wished a safe journey home: it is important for the US federal government to allocate a part of US economic assistance due to the countries from which illegal minors come to the United States of America to fund the costs of humane repatriation of illegal minors, which is in fact the best economic assistance of the United States of America towards these countries. It is also important to invite US charitable foundations willing to fund basic medical care, Spanish and English literacy programs and basic trade and professional training for illegal minors to deal humanely with them.

What should discontented US citizens who do not want to possess a firearm and want to live in a community without private firearms ownership do? First, such discontented US citizens can collectively purchase land and establish gated communities on privately-owned land, where firearms ownership can be temporarily restricted through voluntary agreements between the community and land owners or tenants, provided there is a place in a district, wherein such a community is established, wherein the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon of private US citizens and residents guaranteed by the second amendment to the US constitution is fully respected. Such a community can install panic rooms with bullet proof windows in every floor of every building, hire a private security firm or invite US state and district law enforcement to provide law enforcement services to the community. Alternatively, such discontented US citizens can lobby for a constitutional amendment reflecting their political ideas, although, given the popularity of firearms in the American society, such an amendment is unlikely to be passed. Thus, those Americans who do not want to live with firearms are free to do so, both individually and collectively, as well as to peacefully advocate their political views: they should not, however, conspire to interfere with the constitutional rights of other US citizens through unconstitutional and/or unlawful executive, legislative, or court acts, or through unconstitutional international agreements.

Indeed, from time to time the tree of American liberty has to be washed with the blood of tyrants and patriots, yet some consider this reasonable price of freedom to be excessive. However, the founders of the United States of America established otherwise and for good reasons, shared by every reasonable man and woman aware of the past: absence of widespread civilian ownership and carry of personal weapons in Paris, France led to more than a hundred unnecessary dead civilian French citizens murdered by islamic terrorists, absence of widespread civilian ownership and carry of personal weapons in China led to the heinous war crimes committed by Japanese imperialists against Chinese civilians and hundreds of thousands unnecessary dead civilian Chinese citizens killed by Japanese imperialists, among other mass murders committed against disarmed civilian population, foolish enough to believe the siren song of civilian disarmament. And genocide committed by the totalitarian states in the 20th century brought thousand times as many victims as die every year from criminals and terrorists in the United States of America. As American statesman Benjamin Franklin correctly observed, those who trade freedom for security, deserve neither and will get none.

Indeed, in this perilous times of a growing terrorist threat, growing foreign terrorist threat and a growing threat to the national defense of the United States of America from the Russian federation, or the military alliance of the Russian federation, China and Iran if such an alliance is created, it is obvious to every reasonable man and woman that the obama administration executive order establishing unconstitutional, unlawful and groundless restrictions upon the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms of US citizens and residents, recognized and protected in the second amendment to the US constitution, in particular, unconstitutionally, unlawfully and groundlessly seeking to regulate, i.e. by requiring any registration or license and/or by compelling any background checks, sales of personal weapons done by private US citizens to private US citizens and residents, that is, for so called private sales of personal weapons, as well as unconstitutionally, unlawfully and groundlessly seeking to regulate, i.e. by requiring any registration or license and/or by compelling any background checks, sales of personal weapons done by the US arms dealers who do not sell personal weapons across the borders of US states or across the borders of US territories, is highly detrimental to national defense, territorial defense and public safety in the United States of America, as well as to American liberty, easily misused to create an electronic database of US citizens, owning personal weapons, to subsequently confiscate personal weapons owned by US citizens, as gun registration is gun confiscation.

How should a US citizen react to this siren song of gun control and civilian disarmament, peddled by the obama administration? It is important for each US citizen in these perilous times to purchase an additional machine gun with 12,000 rounds of ammunition, or an automatic rifle with 12,000 rounds of ammunition, or a semiautomatic rifle with 12,000 rounds of ammunition, or a handgun with 1,200 rounds of ammunition for himself and his family until there are two machine guns with 12,000 rounds of ammunition each, or two automatic rifles with 12,000 rounds of ammunition each, or two semiautomatic rifles with 12,000 rounds of ammunition each, two handguns with 1,200 rounds of ammunition each, four military knives and a kevlar per each family member above 12 years of age, as well as to purchase and to give a firearm as a gift to his or her relative or friend if his or her income and savings allow. US citizens and residents should clearly understand and always remember that more personal weapons owned by private US citizens and residents equal less crimes and less domestic terrorism.

How should an American citizen react to any gun confiscation scheme, either state or federal? An American citizen should at least shut himself in his house and prepare to shoot any enforcers of an unconstitutional gun confiscation scheme, justly killing in defense of his property: the blood of such enforcers is upon them. An American citizen should fight such enforcers to the last men, woman and child of his family, and should remember what judeo-bolsheviks did to the Russians, who foolishly permitted themselves to be disarmed, arresting and torturing them. Thus it is better to die free, fighting in dignity than to be tortured by such enforcers who routinely permit their inmates to be raped by negroes and other non-Whites, loosing dignity, for the worst federal enforcers can do to dead bodies is to violate them as US soldiers regularly do to dead Taliban freedom fighters and other dead enemies. Able American citizens should join self-defense militias of the American people, hunt and shoot down such enforcers of an unconstitutional gun confiscation scheme, and furthermore be prepared to hunt and shoot down all doers of the abominable deeds of sexual perversions (homosexuality, lesbianism, bestiality, incest, pedophilia (sexual relations with girls below 12 years of age)), abominations (child murders (abortions), change of gender, cannibalism, human cloning), intentional murder, enslavement of men/women or selling of men/women to slavery in their districts and states, eradicating the abominable from US soil bringing degeneracy and trouble, and should repatriate the jews and non-Whites from the United States of America to their nations or third countries. District and state councils should coordinate the activities of self-defense militias of the American people in resistance to gun confiscation schemes, together with patriotic district and state governments and the US national guard, until US soil is liberated and a gun confiscation scheme repealed. Subsequently, the US federal government should be restructured, reelected and reappointed, all unconstitutional legislation repealed and American liberty restored.

Thus, US nationalists, patriots, republicans, conservatives, fundamentalists and White men and women will successfully resist any gun registration, prohibition, or confiscation scheme proposed by the obama administration and coalition of zionists, masons, democrats, communists, socialists and coloreds that support it. US nationalists, patriots, republicans, conservatives, fundamentalists and White men and women will defend American liberty with firearms to the death, keeping and bearing their firearms in resistance and defiance of the UN arms trade treaty and any obama administration executive order. US nationalists, patriots, republicans, conservatives, fundamentalists and White men and women shall give a simple answer to all American and foreign enemies of the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms of US citizens, recognized and protected in the second amendment to the US constitution: you can get my gun from my cold dead hands.
fdtwain is offline  
Old April 19th, 2016, 08:04 PM   #47
Banned
 
fdtwain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Europe
Posts: 618
For balanced US federal budget

The obama administration submitted a draft US federal budget for budget year 2017, which proposes record deficit in excess of 500 billion USD, seeking to further burden US citizens with ever growing US government debt.

Importantly, it is not difficult to balance US government budget in year 2017:

- limiting US national defense expenditures to 500 billion USD in total, of which 50 billion for overseas operations, saves 100 billion USD;
- abolishing US department of education saves 70 billion USD;
- abolishing US department of homeland security saves 50 billion USD;
- abolishing US environmental protection agency, US Security and exchange commission, US food and drug administration saves 10 billion USD;
- limiting expenditures of US state department and international aid programs to 50 billion USD in total saves 10 billion USD;
- abolishing obamacare in its entirety saves 70 billion USD;
- limiting medicare spending to 500 billion USD annually saves 80 billion USD;
- limiting medicaid spending to 200 billion USD annually saves 180 billion USD.

The above mentioned reasonable reductions in US government budget expenditures saves US taxpayers 570 billion USD in US budget year 2017, allowing for balanced US government budget in 2017. It is important for US republican senators and representatives to find courage and balance US government budget in budget year 2017, honoring the general will of the American people for balanced government budget in the United States of America, expressed many times. It is also important for US republican senators and representatives not to authorize any US federal budget expenditures in excess of 3,600 billion USD of projected US federal budget revenues, preventing US federal government from spending in excess of its revenues.

Reportedly, the obama administration seeks to raise US federal taxes upon already overtaxed US citizens and residents. It is important for US republican senators and representatives not to authorize any new US federal taxes for budget year 2017.

It is important for US citizens to contact their respective US senators and US representatives, politely yet resolutely demanding no new US federal taxes and balanced US federal budget for budget year 2017.

Reportedly, US citizens and legislatures of US states are properly and wisely demanding passage of balanced budget amendment to the US constitution, requiring US federal budget expenditures not to be in excess of US federal budget revenues, except in times of war declared by the US Congress, which is long overdue. It is important for US citizens and legislatures of US states to swiftly draft an appropriate balanced budget amendment to the US constitution and submit it to the US Congress for consideration.

There are reports that some are still plotting reauthorizing of the export-import bank, a corrupt corporate welfare body that siphoned US taxpayer money to huge US corporations. It is important for US republican senators and representatives not to reauthorize the export-import bank, and for US republican, conservative, nationalist, patriotic, fundamentalist and White citizens to contact their US republican senators and representatives, expressing resolute opposition to reauthorization of the export-import bank.

US trade deficit in year 2014 was 530 billion USD. Yet the obama administration proposes so-called trans-pacific partnership, a lousy managed trade deal not based on a reasonable trade theory, which in its current form will further significantly increase US trade deficit and US unemployment rate. It is important for US republican senators and representatives to find courage and reject so-called trans-pacific partnership, and for US republican, conservative, nationalist, patriotic, fundamentalist and White citizens to contact their US republican senators and representatives, expressing resolute opposition to trans- pacific partnership.

US labor participation rate is just 62.5% of US workforce. Adjusting US labor participation rate for the share of US population above 65 years of age in total US population, 14%, who can reasonably be assumed to retire, and for the official US unemployment rate, 5%, 18% of US workforce aged 16-65 years is not in labor force. Reasonably assuming that half of US workforce aged 16-65 years, not in labor force, wants to work and is structurally unemployed, this leads to the real US unemployment rate of 14%.

US inflation rate calculated on the basis of the reasonable year 1980 BLS inflation measure was 7% in 2015.

Therefore, contrary to false claims of the obama administration, severe economic and social crisis, the Greatest Depression, continues in the United States of America. Not surprisingly, US government debt continues to grow, reaching 19 trillion USD in December 2015, rising by 340 billion USD on a single day of November 2015, or by 94% from the beginning of the obama administration in year 2008. Yet US Congress increased the US government debt limit, allowing the obama administration to borrow still more funds, crowding out US private investments and burdening US citizens with ever growing US government debt, a significant part of which is due to foreign lenders, and ever increasing interest costs exceeding 300 billion USD in budget year 2017 alone.

In fact, budget deficit and government debt brings closer bankruptcy of the United States of America, and bankrupt America is weak America. Therefore, it is important for the US Congress to find courage to balance US government budget in budget year 2017, not to raise further US government debt limit and to reject so-called trans-pacific partnership not to increase further US trade deficit. Otherwise, American economic decline will accelerate and Americans will become poorer with each passing year.
fdtwain is offline  
Old April 19th, 2016, 08:04 PM   #48
Banned
 
fdtwain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Europe
Posts: 618
Time to close down Guantanamo Bay military prison

In fact Guantanamo Bay military prison, in which grave and systematic torture of foreign citizens by CIA agents took place for years in violation of the eighth amendment to the US constitution, will have been closed down by the end of year 2016, by the authority of the commander-in-chief of the United States of America. Foreign citizens held therein will be released or, if there are two or three witnesses and objective and sufficient evidence establishing that they killed US citizens, will be judged by US military courts, sentenced to death and executed in accordance with the commandment of God (Exodus 9:4-6, Leviticus 18:24-30, Numbers 35:19, Matthew 5:18, Matthew 7:6, Revelation 13:10, Revelation 21:.

At the same time, as critics correctly complained, no transfers of foreign citizens held at Guantanamo Bay military prison to the territory of the United States of America will be undertaken, as such transfers threaten the national defense of the United States of America.

If any of the released persons continue to engage in terrorism against US citizens, there are armed drones to swiftly execute them. In fact, a reasonable man does not torture and does not imprison terrorists at significant costs to taxpayers, but does not negotiate with terrorists and either swiftly executes all terrorists without trial – those who kill civilians without an objective reason – against which there is testimony of two or three witnesses and objective and sufficient evidence as required by the commandment of God (Exodus 9:4-6, Leviticus 18:24-30, Numbers 35:19, Matthew 5:18, Matthew 7:6, Revelation 13:10, Revelation 21:, or judges, sentences to death and executes all terrorists – those who intentionally murder two or more civilians without an objective reason – in accordance with the commandment of God (Exodus 9:4-6, Leviticus 18:24-30, Numbers 35:19, Matthew 5:18, Matthew 7:6, Revelation 13:10, Revelation 21:.

Honorable US general denies that torture at Guantanamo Bay military prison led to blowback terrorist and militant attacks against US citizens and US businesses overseas. In fact, the objective and sufficient evidence collected in the period of years 2001-2010, established that torture at Guantanamo Bay military prison indeed motivated dozens of blowback terrorist and militant attacks aimed at US citizens and US businesses overseas in addition to provoking growing anti-Americanism in Arab and islamic world, inimical to American trade and commercial interests.

Honorable US general criticizes the recognition of constitutional and legal rights of militants and terrorists held at Guantanamo Bay military prison by the obama administration. In fact, every judge whether religious, military or civil, judging, is to judge by just and non-hypocritical judgment, that is, with the same standard of law and equity for himself, his friends and his enemies, if judgment is to stand.

In dealing with terrorists – those who intentionally murder two or more civilians without objective reasons – against which there is testimony of two or three witnesses and objective and sufficient evidence, it is lawful to execute such terrorists without a trial, in accordance with the commandment of God (Exodus 9:4-6, Leviticus 18:24-30, Numbers 35:19, Matthew 5:18, Matthew 7:6, Revelation 13:10, Revelation 21:.

Furthermore, in dealing with terrorists – those who intentionally murder two or more civilians without objective reasons – which kill US citizens overseas and against which there is testimony of two or three witnesses and objective and sufficient evidence, it is lawful to issue letters of marque and reprisal, subject to article I section 8 of the US constitution: against terrorists and militants, which kill US citizens overseas and against which there is testimony of two or three witnesses and objective and sufficient evidence, executions by armed drones are authorized by the US secretary of justice and the US secretary of defense and carried out by the armed drones of the US department of defense, with subsequent report of each execution accompanied by the testimony of two or three witnesses and objective and sufficient evidence confirming that the executed terrorists and militants killed US citizens overseas, submitted to the appropriate committee of the US Congress, to which it pertains to issue letters of marque and reprisal, subject to article I section 8 of the US constitution.

If foreign terrorists and militants are captured by the United States of America, their constitutional and legal rights will be recognized by the United States of America: foreign citizens, accused of terrorism and militancy, if there are two or three witnesses and objective and sufficient evidence establishing that they killed US citizens, will be judged by US military courts, sentenced to death and executed in accordance with the commandment of God (Exodus 9:4-6, Leviticus 18:24-30, Numbers 35:19, Matthew 5:18, Matthew 7:6, Revelation 13:10, Revelation 21: not to repeat the errors of the past, committed after the second world war, and not to turn the law into the instrument of political injustice, thereby destroying respect for the law.

Additionally, there is a limit of seven years, during which a foreign militant can be detained in US civil or military custody without a trial, which is sufficient to defeat any enemy in the battlefield. This limit is established to deter endless wars, dangerous to freedom, as well as not to establish a dangerous precedent of indefinite detention without trial, inimical to freedom. Therefore, every foreign citizen detained for more than seven years without a trial, must be either given a speedy trial before a US military court or US civilian court, or swiftly released without charges and deported from the territory of the United States of America.

Honorable US general claims that closure of Guantanamo Bay military prison is a mistake. Yet objective and sufficient evidence establishes that continuation of Guantanamo Bay military prison is likely to significantly increase the number of blowback terrorist and militant attacks against US citizens and US businesses overseas as well as to further increase anti-Americanism in Arab and islamic world, inimical to US trade and commercial interests. Furthermore, continuation of Guantanamo Bay military prison burdens US taxpayers with significant and ever increasing costs of upkeep of terrorists and militants.

It is suggested Guantanamo Bay military prison should be loaded with terrorists: this will lead to endless wars the United States of America cannot win and will not win, and to eventual bankruptcy of the United States of America. In fact, a reasonable man does not torture and does not imprison terrorists at significant costs to taxpayers, but does not negotiate with terrorists and either swiftly executes all terrorists without trial – those who kill civilians without an objective reason – against which there is testimony of two or three witnesses and objective and sufficient evidence as required by the commandment of God (Exodus 9:4-6, Leviticus 18:24-30, Numbers 35:19, Matthew 5:18, Matthew 7:6, Revelation 13:10, Revelation 21:, or judges, sentences to death and executes all terrorists – those who intentionally murder two or more civilians without an objective reason – in accordance with the commandment of God (Exodus 9:4-6, Leviticus 18:24-30, Numbers 35:19, Matthew 5:18, Matthew 7:6, Revelation 13:10, Revelation 21:.
fdtwain is offline  
Old April 19th, 2016, 08:05 PM   #49
Banned
 
fdtwain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Europe
Posts: 618
Unreasonable optimism of Berkshire Hathaway

Recently, the honorable chairman of Berkshire Hathaway has expressed unreasonable optimism with regard to the state of the American economy and unjust criticism of the American presidential candidates that properly and wisely warn Americans of hard times ahead.

In fact, objective economic facts speak contrary to the unreasonable optimism of Berkshire Hathaway.

The obama administration submitted the draft US federal budget for budget year 2017, which proposes record deficit in excess of 500 billion USD, seeking to further burden US citizens with ever growing US government debt.

US trade deficit in year 2014 was 530 billion USD. Yet the obama administration proposes the so-called trans-pacific partnership, a lousy managed trade deal, not based on a reasonable trade theory, which in its current form will further significantly increase US trade deficit and US unemployment rate

US labor participation rate is just 62.5% of US workforce. Adjusting US labor participation rate for the share of US population above 65 years of age in total US population, 14%, who can reasonably be assumed to retire, and for the official US unemployment rate, 5%, 18% of US workforce aged 16-65 years is not in labor force. Reasonably assuming that half of US workforce aged 16-65 years, not in labor force, wants to work and is structurally unemployed, this leads to the real US unemployment rate of 14%.

US inflation rate calculated on the basis of the reasonable year 1980 BLS inflation measure was 7% in 2015.

In fact, severe economic and social crisis, the Greatest Depression, continues in the United States of America. Not surprisingly, US government debt continues to grow, reaching 19 trillion USD in December 2015, rising by 340 billion USD on a single day of November 2015, or by 94% from the beginning of the obama administration in year 2008. Yet US Congress increased the US government debt limit, allowing the obama administration to borrow still more funds, crowding out US private investments and burdening US citizens with ever growing US government debt, a significant part of which is due to foreign lenders, and ever increasing interest costs exceeding 300 billion USD in budget year 2017 alone.

In fact, budget deficit and government debt brings closer bankruptcy of the United States of America, and bankrupt America is weak America. In fact, American economic decline is accelerating and Americans become poorer with each passing year.

The honorable chairman of Berkshire Hathaway claims that American GDP per capita is six times higher in real terms presently, as it was in 1930, which is true. But the present US government debt of 19 trillion USD is more than 150 times in nominal terms than the US government debt of 123 billion USD in 1930, while nominal American GDP per capita increased only by 75 times from 750 USD per capita in 1930 to 56,500 USD per capita in 2015 according to official estimates, which misuse creative statistics to artificially inflate US GDP. Thus, in real terms US government debt grew at least twice faster than US GDP, US corporate and consumer debt is at record levels as well, and a sizeable part of this debt is owned by foreigners. Therefore, economic growth in the United States of America is debt-driven, not savings-driven, and the borrowed funds are not put to productive use.

Furthermore, natural resources of the world are being rapidly depleted. In 2008, according to scientific studies, there were no sufficient natural resources to support physical existence of 1/3 of the world population, by 2028, according to scientific studies, there will be no sufficient natural resources to support physical existence of 2/3 of the world population, unless a new generation of agricultural and production technologies is developed and deployed all over the world. The United States of America presently consumes 30% of the natural resources of the world, although American population is 4.5% of the world population, more than six times in excess of average consumption of natural resources throughout the world, - the consumption pattern that is clearly unsustainable over the long term.

Importantly, great challenges are coming to the world. The Holy Scriptures indicate that the events described in the Book of Revelation of John will soon take place. In particular, worldwide totalitarian democratic surveillance state, the world of Antichrist, led by two great men, the Antichrist, the Beast of Revelation, judas iscariot incarnate, an apostle of Lord Jesus Christ and a priest of Lord God Jehovah, the last Pope of Rome, and the False Prophet of Revelation, pontius pilate incarnate, likely barrack hussein obama, the next secretary general of the United Nations Organization, is presently established worldwide, with the United Nations Organizations as the world government. These events will bring hard times to the world and the United States of America, which were never in the past, nor will be in the future and which will bring physical damages to the world ten thousand times greater than the combined assets of Berkshire Hathaway, as it is written of these events by Lord Jesus Christ:

St Mark 13:19-20
For in those days shall be affliction such as was not from the beginning of the creation which God created unto this time neither shall be
And except that the Lord had shortened those days no flesh should be saved but for the elect's sake whom he hath chosen he hath shortened the days

Even worse, in seven years thereafter the Second Coming of Lord Jesus Christ will take place.

In the Second Coming of Lord Jesus Christ:

- Lord Jesus Christ will burn alive with the unknown force of nature to many – super-strong interaction - the army of the Antichrist, the Beast of Revelation, judas iscariot incarnate, an apostle of Lord Jesus Christ and a priest of Lord God Jehovah (Matthew 27:5), the last Pope of Rome, the False Prophet – pontius pilate incarnate - likely barrack hussein obama, the next secretary general of the UN, made of hundreds of millions of soldiers and volunteers of all nations under the UN banner. And this shall be the plague wherewith the Lord will smite all the people that have fought against Jerusalem: their flesh shall be consumed away while they stand upon their feet, and their eyes shall be consumed away in their holes, and their tongue shall be consumed away in their mouth (Zechariah 14:12). And I saw the beast, and the kings of the earth, and their armies, gathered together to make war against him that sat on the horse, and against his army. And the beast was taken, and with him the false prophet that wrought miracles before him, with which he deceived them that had received the mark of the beast, and them that worshiped his image. These both were cast alive into a lake of fire burning with brimstone. And the remnant were slain with the sword of him that sat upon the horse, which sword proceeded out of his mouth: and all the fowls were filled with their flesh (Revelation 19:19-21);
- Lord Jesus Christ will change human fleshy bodies into the bodies of the sons of God, made of light (I Corinthians 15:51-52), and will raise in the clouds to the stars (I Thessalonians 4:16-17) 144000 elect jews (Revelation 7) and a small number of elect Christians (Luke 18:;
- subsequently the whole earth and billions of the whole sinful humanity, except for 144000 elect jews (Revelation 7) and a small number of elect Christians (Luke 18:, will be burned alive with sunheat, released from explosion of the Sun from the strike of the comet (Revelation 16:8-9), which will initiate the process of global warming, extraterrestrial in nature and not dependent upon any deeds of men and women whatsoever, for even if men became angels the global warming would begin in the time appointed as a part of the awful justice and awful vengeance of Lord God Jehovah unto humanity for the judicial murder of Lord Jesus Christ – judgment of Revelation - that will result in explosion of the Sun with release of sunheat, which will make the Moon red hot and will burn alive the whole earth (Joel 2:31) and billions of the whole sinful humanity, except for 144000 elect jews (Revelation 7) and a small number of elect Christians (Luke 18:.

Of this time it is written:

Luke 17:26-30
And as it was in the days of Noe, so shall it be also in the days of the Son of man.
They did eat, they drank, they married wives, they were given in marriage, until the day that Noe entered into the ark, and the flood came, and destroyed them all.
Likewise also as it was in the days of Lot, they did eat, they drank, they bought, they sold, they planted, they builded,
But the same day that Lot went out of Sodom it rained fire and brimstone from heaven, and destroyed them all.
Even thus shall it be in the day when the Son of man is revealed.
Joel 2:31
The sun shall be turned into darkness [the Sun will explode and become dark] and the moon into blood [the Moon will be made red by sunheat released by the exploded Sun] before the great and the terrible day of the Lord come

2 Peter 3:10
But the day of the Lord will come as a thief in the night in the which the heavens shall pass away with a great noise and the elements shall melt with fervent heat the earth also and the works that are therein shall be burned up

Jeremiah 4:23-28
I beheld the earth and lo it was without form and void and the heavens and they had no light
I beheld the mountains and lo they trembled and all the hills moved lightly
I beheld and lo there was no man and all the birds of the heavens were fled
I beheld and lo the fruitful place was a wilderness and all the cities thereof were broken down at the presence of the Lord and by his fierce anger
For thus hath the Lord said The whole land shall be desolate yet will I not make a full end
For this shall the earth mourn and the heavens above be black because I have spoken it I have purposed it and will not repent neither will I turn back from it

It is important to understand that this prophecy will be fulfilled by Lord Jesus Christ himself and by the saints coming in the clouds of heaven, so that scoffers who ask where Lord Jesus Christ is will be eternally ashamed by his awful and glorious revelation in the flesh on the Judgment Day.

As for the time of the Second Coming of Lord Jesus Christ, the day and hour are known exclusively to Lord God Jehovah (Matthew 24:36, Matthew 25:13). As for the year, since Lord Jesus Christ was crucified between 30AD and 37AD, Lord Jesus Christ was resurrected on the third day, and with Lord God Jehovah one day is a thousand earthly years (2 Peter 3:, it points out that Lord Jesus Christ will return to earth in 2000 years after the birth of Lord Jesus Christ, that is, after 2000 AD. As Jerusalem was destroyed in 70 AD as a precursor to the end of the world and the new destruction of Jerusalem by the Antichrist, the Beast of Revelation - judas iscariot incarnate - an apostle of Lord Jesus Christ and a priest of Lord God Jehovah (Matthew 27:5), the last Pope of Rome, the longest possible term for the 2nd Coming of Lord Jesus Christ is 2070 AD, and terms are shortened for the elect’s sake (Mark 13:20): since after the glorious resurrection of Lord Jesus Christ the term of 50 years is often reduced to 7 years, the earliest possible year for the Second Coming of Lord Jesus Christ is 2027. Thus the 2nd Coming of Lord Jesus Christ is likely to happen between 2000 AD and 2070 AD, the exact day and hour is known only to God the Father, Lord God Jehovah, which leaves in year 2016 less than 54 years before the Second Coming of Lord Jesus Christ.

The honorable chairman of Berkshire Hathaway claims that the newly born generation of Americans will be far better off than their parents.

Yet the United States of America is full of the doers of the abominable deeds of sexual perversions (homosexuality (Leviticus 20:13), lesbianism (Leviticus 20:13), bestiality (Leviticus 20:15), incest (Leviticus 20:11-17), pedophilia (sexual relations with girls below 12 years of age) (Leviticus 20:2-3, Matthew 18:6)), abominations (child murders (abortions) (Leviticus 20:2-3, Exodus 21:22-25), change of gender (Book of Enoch, section XVII, chapter 86; section II, chapter 10), cannibalism (Book of Enoch, section II, chapter 7,10), human cloning (Book of Enoch, section XVII; chapter 86, section II, chapter 10), intentional murder (Exodus 21:14), enslavement of men/women (Exodus 21:16) or selling of men/women to slavery (Exodus 21:16) (Leviticus 18:24-30), defiling the land, corrupting the American people and American youth, and has spat in the face of Almighty Creator God, Lord God Jehovah, Lord Jesus Christ, Holy Spirit by legalizing so-called homosexual marriages and child-murder (abortions), slouching towards Sodom and Gomorrah, against which the faithful Christians of Westboro Baptist church protested, and against which the faithful American judges Robert Bork, Antonin Scalia, Roy Moore, Andrew Napolitano protested.

Lord Jesus Christ spoke otherwise of the present generation of newly born Americans:

Luke 23:29-30
For, behold, the days are coming, in the which they shall say, Blessed are the barren, and the wombs that never bare, and the paps which never gave suck.
Then shall they begin to say to the mountains, Fall on us; and to the hills, Cover us

It is well known that the words of a man that are contrary to the clear commandments of Lord Jesus Christ are lies of a sinful man. Therefore, Berkshire Hathaway’s optimism with regard to the state of the American economy is unreasonable and is without merit either with regard to the present state of the American economy as established by objective economic facts, or to the forthcoming challenges coming to the present world as established in the Holy Scripture. In contrast, the American presidential candidates who warn the American people of the present severe economic and social crisis, the Greatest Depression, that continues in the United States of America, of the hard times ahead and that the newly born generation of the Americans will be far worse off than the present generation of the Americans speak honestly of the present and of the future of the United States of America.
fdtwain is offline  
Old April 19th, 2016, 08:07 PM   #50
Celebrating diversity
 
Sabcat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Earth
Posts: 21,137
Thanks from imaginethat
Sabcat is offline  
Reply

  Defending The Truth Political Forum > Political Issues > Money and Finance > Economics

Tags
american, defending, freedom



Search tags for this page
Click on a term to search for related topics.
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Will Native American Religious Freedom Count As Much As Hobby Lobby's? skews13 Current Events 13 July 27th, 2015 06:05 AM
If burning the American Flag is considered Freedom of Speech, FOXNEWS Current Events 64 December 30th, 2013 06:35 AM
A New Birth of American Freedom sumara Current Events 9 July 8th, 2013 11:44 AM
Government Freedom Cartoon: "Make Mine Freedom" Dude111 Political Talk 0 November 29th, 2010 10:39 PM


Facebook Twitter RSS Feed



Copyright © 2005-2013 Defending The Truth. All rights reserved.