Political Forums  

Go Back   Defending The Truth Political Forum > Political Issues > Money and Finance > Economics


Thanks Tree11Thanks
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old May 3rd, 2016, 08:17 AM   #51
Banned
 
fdtwain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Europe
Posts: 618
More guns, less crime

The American democratic stateswoman erroneously claimed that Americans have too many guns.

In fact, Americans need a lot more guns that Americans presently have for the purposes of self-defense, territorial defense of the territory of US districts and US states and the national defense of the United States of America. In fact, each American citizen should own at least two or better four machine guns with 12000 rounds of ammunition each or at least two or better four automatic rifles with 12000 rounds of ammunition each or at least two or better four semi-automatic rifles with 12000 rounds of ammunition each, at least two or better four handguns with 1200 rounds of ammunition each, at least two or better four military knives and a kevlar per each family member above 12 years of age for the purposes of territorial defense of the territory of US districts and US states and the national defense of the United States of America, which is especially important given the growing threat to the national defense of the United States of America from the Russian federation, or the military alliance of the Russian federation, China and Iran if such a military alliance is formed. With the present US population of 318 million US citizens, US citizens should own and carry a lot more personal weapons that Americans presently have for the purposes of territorial defense of the territory of US districts and US states and the national defense of the United States of America.

The American democratic stateswoman made a number of unconstitutional, unlawful and groundless proposals with regard to so-called gun control laws. The American democratic stateswoman is reportedly unhappy with private gun sales between US citizens and residents at gun shows and online.

In fact, the presidency of the United States of America and the US executive branch cannot legislate new US laws, as article 1 section 1 of the US constitution grants all legislative powers to the US congress. In fact, US executive orders are issued by US presidency to ascertain that US laws are faithfully executed, subject to article 2 section 3 of the US constitution, and are binding solely upon employees of the US federal government. Yet the American democratic stateswoman seeks to unconstitutionally, unlawfully and groundlessly legislate new US laws, establishing unconstitutional, unlawful and groundless restrictions upon the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms of US citizens and residents, recognized and protected in the second amendment to the US constitution, thereby exceeding the constitutional powers of US presidency and the US executive branch and usurping the legislative powers of the US congress.

In particular, the presidency of the United States of America and the US executive branch cannot require any registration or license from private US citizens engaging in buying or selling personal weapons - military knives, handguns, semi-automatic and automatic rifles, machine guns, grenades, portable grenade launchers, portable missile launchers, portable anti-aircraft missiles, portable anti-tank missiles, portable naval missiles and appropriate munitions and explosives – to private US citizens and residents, that is, for so called private sales of personal weapons, nor require that private US citizens engaging in buying or selling personal weapons - military knives, handguns, semi-automatic and automatic rifles, machine guns, grenades, portable grenade launchers, portable missile launchers, portable anti-aircraft missiles, portable anti-tank missiles, portable naval missiles and appropriate munitions and explosives – carry out background checks of private US citizens and residents to whom they sell their personal weapons, that is, for so called private sales of personal weapons.

In fact, the words of the second amendment to the US constitution recognizing the derivative natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms as a civil right are clear:

“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed”

The second amendment to the US constitution recognizes and protects the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms of citizens of the United States, who keep and bear, buy, sell and transfer personal arms irrespective of purposes - that is, all arms and weapons that can be born by a man, including knives, handguns, semi-automatic and automatic weapons, machine guns, grenades, portable grenade launchers, portable rocket launchers, portable anti-aircraft missiles, portable anti-tank missiles, portable naval missiles, appropriate munitions and explosives. The second amendment to the US constitution does not apply to the advanced weapons that cannot be born by a man as tanks, military aircrafts and helicopters, warships: such weapons are owned collectively by the American people and belong to the US armed forces and the national guard of the US states. The second amendment to the US constitution does not apply to chemical, biological and nuclear weapons of mass destruction: these weapons are owned solely by the US federal government. The second amendment to the US constitution prohibits requirement of any registration or license as a condition for exercise the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms of citizens of the United States, who keep and bear, buy, sell and transfer personal arms irrespective of purposes - that is, all arms and weapons that can be born by a man, including knives, handguns, semi-automatic and automatic weapons, machine guns, grenades, portable grenade launchers, portable rocket launchers, portable anti-aircraft missiles, portable anti-tank missiles, portable naval missiles, appropriate munitions and explosives. Registration with the governments of US states can be required with regard to portable rocket launchers, portable anti-aircraft missiles, portable anti-tank missiles, portable naval missiles to allow an owner of a portable missile launcher, a portable anti-aircraft missile, a portable anti-tank missile, a portable naval missile to be swiftly drafted into the national guard of a US state for the purposes of territorial defense of the territory of a US state. With regard to all other personal weapons, including automatic weapons and machine guns, no restrictions are constitutionally permissible, and any registration requirements are constitutionally prohibited.

US congress, subject to its legislative powers to regulate commerce among US states under article 1 section 8 of the US constitution, required professional US arms dealers engaging in trade in arms and weapons across the borders of US states as their main economic activity to register with the US federal government and to carry out background checks to verify at a database that a purchaser of a personal weapon is not convicted in the court of law of the state of a felony crime, criminal in character, and not criminalized political or civil conduct, and is not recognized by the court of law of the state as criminally insane, having committed a felony crime, criminal in character, and not criminalized political or civil conduct, as the above-mentioned persons were properly and wisely not recognized as US citizens when the US constitution was ratified, and which the above-mentioned professional US arms dealers can reasonably be expected to do successfully.

It is clear that the second amendment to the US constitution and the tenth amendment to the US constitution prohibits the US federal government from regulating, i.e. by requiring any registration or license and/or by compelling any background checks, sales of personal weapons - military knives, handguns, semi-automatic and automatic rifles, machine guns, grenades, portable grenade launchers, portable missile launchers, portable anti-aircraft missiles, portable anti-tank missiles, portable naval missiles and appropriate munitions and explosives - done by private US citizens to private US citizens and residents, that is, for so called private sales of personal weapons, as well as from regulating, i.e. by requiring any registration or license and/or by compelling any background checks, sales of personal weapons - military knives, handguns, semi-automatic and automatic rifles, machine guns, grenades, portable grenade launchers, portable missile launchers, portable anti-aircraft missiles, portable anti-tank missiles, portable naval missiles and appropriate munitions and explosives - done by the US arms dealers that do not sell the above-mentioned personal weapons across the borders of US states or across the borders of US territories.

It is clear that private US citizens that sell personal weapons - military knives, handguns, semi-automatic and automatic rifles, machine guns, grenades, portable grenade launchers, portable missile launchers, portable anti-aircraft missiles, portable anti-tank missiles, portable naval missiles and appropriate munitions and explosives – to private US citizens and residents cannot be reasonably expected to prevent sales of personal weapons to criminals and criminally insane persons. Furthermore, any background check requirements for sales of personal weapons by private US citizens to private US citizens and residents, that is, for so called private sales of personal weapons, cannot reasonably be expected to prevent acquisition of the above-mentioned personal weapons by criminals and criminally insane persons, who get their personal weapons from black markets, which are continuously supplied with the above-mentioned personal weapons imported to the US territory or stolen from US owners, and therefore cannot reasonably be expected to decrease gun violence and increase public safety in the United States of America, the intended purpose of so-called gun control laws.

In fact it has been proven statistically beyond reasonable doubt by American classical scientists, including American classical researcher John Lott, that more personal weapons owned by US citizens and residents leads to fewer crimes committed over time, and, in consequence, to less gun violence and increased public safety in the United States of America: hence sales of personal weapons - military knives, handguns, semi-automatic and automatic rifles, machine guns, grenades, portable grenade launchers, portable missile launchers, portable anti-aircraft missiles, portable anti-tank missiles, portable naval missiles and appropriate munitions and explosives - done by private US citizens to private US citizens and residents, that is, so called private sales of personal weapons, in fact, decrease gun violence and increase public safety in the United States of America.

The restriction upon exercise of a constitutional right of US citizens may be permitted if done to advance objective and compelling state interest of the United States of America employing necessary and the least restrictive means, reasonably expected to achieve its intended purpose, provided a constitutional right of US citizens is preserved and the exercise of a constitutional right of US citizens is not significantly burdened thereby. In fact, the US presidential executive order establishing unconstitutional, unlawful and groundless restrictions upon the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms of US citizens and residents, recognized and protected in the second amendment to the US constitution, in particular, unconstitutionally, unlawfully and groundlessly seeking to regulate, i.e. by requiring any registration or license and/or by compelling any background checks, sales of personal weapons done by private US citizens to private US citizens and residents, that is, for so called private sales of personal weapons, as well as unconstitutionally, unlawfully and groundlessly seeking to regulate, i.e. by requiring any registration or license and/or by compelling any background checks, sales of personal weapons done by the US arms dealers who do not sell the personal weapons across the borders of US states or across the borders of US territories, does not advance any objective and compelling state interest of the United States of America, and its intended means are not necessary and are not the least restrictive means, available to achieve its intended purpose to decrease gun violence and to increase public safety in the United States of America, and cannot be reasonably expected to achieve its intended purpose to decrease gun violence and to increase public safety in the United States of America, as demonstrated above.

Furthermore, committed misdemeanor crimes and objectively defined mental illness per se cannot disqualify a US citizen from exercising his or her civil rights, including the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms, recognized and protected in the second amendment to the US constitution, as such persons were recognized as US citizens in the times when the US constitution was ratified. US federal and state courts may prohibit ownership and carrying of personal weapons to a US citizen, convicted of a felony crime, criminal in character, and not criminalized political or civil conduct, or recognized as criminally insane, having committed a felony crime, criminal in character, and not criminalized political or civil conduct, as a part of the punishment of a felony crime, criminal in character, and not criminalized political or civil conduct, or to a US resident convicted of a felony crime, criminal in character, and not criminalized political or civil conduct, or recognized as criminally insane, having committed a felony crime, criminal in character, and not criminalized political or civil conduct, as a part of the punishment of a felony crime, criminal in character, and not criminalized political or civil conduct, as the above-mentioned persons were not recognized US citizens in the times when the US constitution was ratified. In fact, misdemeanor crimes do not disqualify those US citizens and residents who commit them from exercise of their civil rights, and the large majority of the objectively defined mentally ill US citizens and residents who own and carry personal weapons do not commit crimes and overcome their illness with appropriate medications due to the progress of medicine.

Additionally, US bureau of alcohol, tobacco and firearms is responsible for thousands of felony crimes against US citizens, in particular, burning alive of hundreds of US citizens who belonged to the Branch of David church in Waco, TX, it needs to be swiftly abolished and will eventually be abolished.

The American democratic stateswoman is reportedly unhappy that gun sales that are not rejected during background check within three days are allowed to proceed: yet the fundamental legal principle of presumption of innocence requires to allow a gun sale to proceed if not rejected during background check. In fact, US citizens and residents are presumed to be law abiding under US laws, unless otherwise established by a ruling of a US federal or state court, convicting him in the court of law of the state of a felony crime, criminal in character, and not criminalized political or civil conduct, or recognizing him as criminally insane, having committed a felony crime, criminal in character, and not criminalized political or civil conduct. Therefore, gun sales that are not rejected during background check within three days are allowed to proceed and will be allowed to proceed.

The American democratic stateswoman reportedly seeks unconstitutional, unlawful and groundless restrictions on the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms for US citizens and residents listed in so-called terror watch lists.

In fact, the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms of a US citizen or a US resident, recognized and protected in the second amendment to the US constitution, cannot be abridged on the basis of mere suspicion of terrorist activities that serve as a basis for listing a US citizen or a US resident in so-called terror watch lists. It is well established by objective facts that so-called terror watch lists contain many names of US citizens and residents whose political and religious opinions are unpopular with the US federal government and who are not in any way connected to genuine terrorism – killing of civilians for no objective reasons. It is also well known that presently many deeds, not connected to genuine terrorism – killing of civilians for no objective reasons, are regretfully defined as terrorism in US federal law or international anti-terrorist treaties, which retards effectiveness and efficiency of fight against terrorism, for genuine terrorists – those who kill civilians for no objective reasons - are not negotiated with, but either executed outright in accordance with the commandment of God (Exodus 21:14, Numbers 35:19, Matthew 5:18, Revelation 13:10), or judged in military court or civil courts, sentenced to death and executed in accordance with the commandment of God (Exodus 21:14, Matthew 5:18, Revelation 13:10). Therefore, mere listing a US citizen or a US resident in so-called terror watch lists cannot constitute objective and compelling state interest to deny him or her the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms, recognized and protected in the second amendment to the US constitution.

The wording of the second amendment to the US constitution is clear:

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

The US federal law acknowledges that convicted felons, who committed a felony, criminal in character, and not criminalized civil or political conduct, and criminally insane individuals, who were institutionalized by decisions of US courts as a punishment for committing a felony, criminal in character, and not criminalized civil or political conduct, can be prohibited from ownership of personal weapons as a part of punishment for their crimes, since felons, who committed a felony, criminal in character, and not criminalized civil or political conduct, and criminally insane individuals, who were institutionalized as a punishment for committing a felony, criminal in character, and not criminalized civil or political conduct, were not recognized as US citizens in saner times. Yet it is clear that mere suspicion of terrorism is not sufficient to deny US citizens and residents their derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms, recognized and protected under the second amendment to the US constitution, and the American democratic stateswoman who improperly and unwisely called for unconstitutional, unlawful and groundless restrictions on the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms for US citizens and residents listed in so-called terror watch lists advocate unconstitutional, unlawful and groundless prior restraint upon a constitutional right of US citizens and residents, prohibited by the second amendment to the US constitution.

Nor are the means sought by the democratic senator and the democratic representative necessary or proportionate to prevent genuine terrorists from obtaining personal weapons.

There are reasonable measures available to be taken to prevent undesirable foreigners from coming to the United States of America. First, it is repatriation of all illegal and criminal foreign migrants present in the territory of the United States of America back to their homelands, except for those of them who married US citizens and produced children in marriage. Second, it is abolishment of the so-called visa waver program with 38 foreign nations, which allows foreign citizens to travel to the United States of America without a necessary visa screening process, reasonable in these times of growing domestic and international terrorism worldwide. Finally, US border patrol agents may apply particular scrutiny to all foreign citizens who come to the United States of America, listed in so-called terror watch lists, even those who come to the United States of America within the so-called visa waver program, preventing their entry to the United States of America as undesirable foreigners by the sovereign decision of the United States of America that does not need any explanations. Therefore, if the American democratic stateswoman is concerned with the possibility of the foreigners listed in so-called terror watch lists coming to the United States of America should concern themselves with repatriation of illegal and criminal foreign migrants from the territory of the United States of America, with abolishment of the so-called visa waver program and with adequate funding of US border patrol agency, and not with unconstitutional, unlawful and groundless prior restraint upon constitutional rights of US citizens and residents.

Similarly, the United States of America has a sovereign right to remove US citizenship from those treasonous US citizens who wage war against the United States of America on behalf of other states, nations and peoples, or in armed domestic insurrections and armed rebellions against the United States of America.

Additionally, it is long overdue to establish in US federal and state laws the death sentence in all cases as a punishment for genuine terrorism – intentional murder of two or more civilians, not to keep and bread convicted terrorists at the expense of US taxpayers.

In fact, unconstitutional, unlawful and groundless restrictions on the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms for US citizens and residents listed in so-called terror watch lists would directly lead to de-facto abolishment of the second amendment to the US constitution, by allowing the US federal government to classify any US citizen as suspected terrorist merely on the basis of his or her political or religious opinion, which regretfully happened in the United States of America in the past, subsequently denying him or her in prior restraint and without due process of law their derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms, recognized and protected under the second amendment to the US constitution, which is prohibited in the second amendment to the US constitution that specifically establishes that the right of every US citizen to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed upon.

Importantly, the means sought by the American democratic stateswoman are neither effective nor efficient, and are therefore unlikely to achieve their intended objectives. The history of the United States of America as well as the history of other nations of the world amply demonstrated to every reasonable man and woman that it is armed citizenry of the state that is the first and most effective line of defense against terrorists and anarchists: wherever the citizenry of the state is armed and reasonable public safety measures taken, terrorists end up with killing one or two persons at most. In contrast, whenever the citizenry of the state is disarmed and reasonable public safety measures are not taken, as in case of the recent terrorist attacks in France, terrorists end up killing dozens or even hundreds of innocent men, women and children, who, being disarmed and denied reasonable public safety measures, are unable to resist terrorists, who are well armed, easily obtaining their weapons from black markets. In case of France and Belgium socialist ideology was cited as a reason for disarmed citizenry and economy was cited as a reason for the failure to provide reasonable public safety measures, including panic rooms on every floor of every public building, and the price for this socialist ideology and this economy were dozens of French lives unnecessary lost to terrorists.

In fact, in times of terrorist threat it is important first and foremost to arm the people, even though there may be domestic terrorists among the people, precisely because terrorists can do far less damage when faced by the armed citizenry. The means sought by the democratic senator and the democratic representative would result in many disarmed citizens on the basis of mere suspicion of terrorism, some of whom belong to disadvantaged political and religious minorities, who, being often opposed to mainstream political and religious opinions, are already the primary target of domestic and foreign terrorists, as recent terrorist attacks on Charlie Hebdoe magazine demonstrated. Indeed, in present-day United States of America wherein the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms of US citizens and residents is recognized and protected in the second amendment to the US constitution, it is possible for a foreign terrorist to come into the United States of America, to purchase personal weapons and to kill one or two US citizens before he or she is stopped, which is the price of freedom, well worthy to be paid by every reasonable US citizen, every reasonable man and every reasonable woman, for the tree of liberty must be watered from time to time with blood of tyrants and patriots. Yet, the means sought by the American democratic stateswoman would allow a foreign terrorist not only to come into the United States of America and to purchase personal weapons in black markets whence such obtain their arms, but also to kill dozens or even hundreds disarmed US citizens, attacking disadvantaged political and religious minorities that are presently at least armed with personal weapons and can defend themselves from terrorists, but who may well be disarmed as suspected terrorists in so-called terror watch lists by those in the US federal government who still fear jihadists or violent extremists under every bed.

In fact, American classical researchers, including American classical researcher John Lott, have statistically proved beyond reasonable doubt for all states, nations and peoples that more guns owned and carried by citizens and residents of the state leads to less crime, including less terrorism, committed in the state. Thus, the means sought by the American democratic stateswoman would lead to fewer guns owned by US citizens and residents and therefore to more crime, including more grievous terrorist acts committed on the US soil, and not surprisingly: as American statesman Benjamin Franklin correctly observed, those who trade freedom for security get neither and deserve none.

The American stateswoman is reportedly unhappy with some personal weapons she calls “assault weapons”: yet all personal weapons are assault weapons.

In fact, the words of the second amendment to the US constitution recognizing the derivative natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms as a civil right are clear:

“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed”

The second amendment to the US constitution recognizes and protects the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms of citizens of the United States, who keep and bear, buy, sell and transfer personal arms irrespective of purposes - that is, all arms and weapons that can be born by a man, including knives, handguns, semi-automatic and automatic weapons, machine guns, grenades, portable grenade launchers, portable rocket launchers, portable anti-aircraft missiles, portable anti-tank missiles, portable naval missiles, appropriate munitions and explosives. The second amendment to the US constitution does not apply to the advanced weapons that cannot be born by a man as tanks, military aircrafts and helicopters, warships: such weapons are owned collectively by the American people and belong to the US armed forces and the national guard of the US states. The second amendment to the US constitution does not apply to chemical, biological and nuclear weapons of mass destruction: these weapons are owned solely by the US federal government. The second amendment to the US constitution prohibits requirement of any registration or license as a condition for exercise the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms of citizens of the United States, who keep and bear, buy, sell and transfer personal arms irrespective of purposes - that is, all arms and weapons that can be born by a man, including knives, handguns, semi-automatic and automatic weapons, machine guns, grenades, portable grenade launchers, portable rocket launchers, portable anti-aircraft missiles, portable anti-tank missiles, portable naval missiles, appropriate munitions and explosives. Registration with the governments of US states can be required with regard to portable rocket launchers, portable anti-aircraft missiles, portable anti-tank missiles, portable naval missiles to allow an owner of a portable missile launcher, a portable anti-aircraft missile, a portable anti-tank missile, a portable naval missile to be swiftly drafted into the national guard of a US state for the purposes of territorial defense of the territory of a US state. With regard to all other personal weapons, including automatic weapons and machine guns, no restrictions are constitutionally permissible, and any registration requirements are constitutionally prohibited.

The personal weapons, that is, all arms and weapons that can be born by a man, including knives, handguns, semi-automatic and automatic weapons, machine guns, grenades, portable grenade launchers, portable rocket launchers, portable anti-aircraft missiles, portable anti-tank missiles, portable naval missiles, appropriate munitions and explosives, are essential for the purposes of self-defense, territorial defense of the territory of US districts and US states and the national defense of the United States of America, which is particularly important given the growing threat to the national defense of the United States of America from the Russian federation, or the military alliance of the Russian federation, China and Iran if such a military alliance is formed, as well as for the purposes of hunting large wild beasts of prey and birds of prey as bears, lions, leopards, hippopotamuses, crocodiles, eagles.

The American democratic stateswoman reportedly seeks unconstitutional, unlawful and groundless imposition of civil responsibility on gun manufacturers and gun sellers whose guns are used in crimes, which is totally without merit, as it is not easy to objectively distinguish between a legitimate personal weapons buyer and a prospective criminal and US laws already provide civil law redress if faulty or malfunctioning firearms are sold by gun manufacturers and gun sellers and the discharge of a faulty or malfunctioning firearm results in death of an individual. In fact, law has long established that a manufacturer and a seller cannot be held liable for misuse of a properly manufactured good for criminal purposes.

Finally, the American democratic stateswoman is considering unconstitutional, unlawful and groundless confiscation of lawfully owned personal weapons by US citizens and residents, which demonstrate her profound contempt for natural rights, derivative-natural rights, civil rights of US citizens and residents, guaranteed by the US constitution and for the founders of the United States of America. It is important for US citizens and residents to understand that history of many states, nations and peoples established beyond reasonable doubt that gun registration and gun licensing is gun confiscation. It is important for US citizens and residents to understand that without armed US citizenry, all natural rights, derivative-natural rights, civil rights and traditional rights of US citizens and residents will become mere vain words, abrogated by the US federal, state and local governments at will, and the United States of America will be defenseless against its domestic and foreign enemies of which there are many. As US statesman Benjamin Franklin correctly observed those who trade freedom for security will get neither and deserve none.
fdtwain is offline  
Old May 3rd, 2016, 08:17 AM   #52
Banned
 
fdtwain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Europe
Posts: 618
What should American citizens who support firearms ownership and the second amendment to the US constitution do?

First, it is important to know and understand that the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms is established by God, proceeds from God and is only recognized and protected in the second amendment to the US constitution.

Lord God Jehovah said:

Book of Enoch, Section 17, Chapter 90
And I saw till a great sword was given to the sheep

Lord Jesus Christ said:

Luke 22:36
And he that hath no sword let him sell his garment and buy one

thereby allowing and ordering each worshiper of Lord God Jehovah and each worshiper of Lord Jesus Christ to own a personal weapon.

Luke 22:38 furthermore established that apostles of Lord Jesus Christ had purchased, owned and carried two personal weapons – swords - for themselves and their relatives, ownership and carry of which was prohibited to non-Roman citizens under the penalty of death, thereby legalizing ownership and carry of personal weapons by citizens and residents of any state.

Since all power is given unto Lord Jesus Christ in heaven and on earth (Matthew 28:1 and the earth and heaven shall pass away, but the words of Lord Jesus Christ will not pass away (Matthew 24:35), all American and foreign enemies of the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms of US citizens, recognized and protected in the second amendment to the US constitution, will not prevail, but the actions of all American and foreign enemies of the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms of US citizens, recognized and protected in the second amendment to the US constitution, will only significantly increase the number of personal weapons to be owned and carried by US citizens.

The text of the second amendment to the US constitution is clear:

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

This signifies that a US citizen is allowed to keep and bear, buy, sell and transfer personal weapons that can be kept and carried - military knives, handguns, semi-automatic and automatic rifles, machine guns, grenades, portable grenade launchers, portable missile launchers, portable anti-aircraft missiles, portable anti-tank missiles, portable naval missiles and appropriate munitions and explosives, without any license or registration.

Every American family should purchase guns: at least two machine guns or automatic rifles or semi-automatic rifles with at least 12,000 rounds of ammunition each, at least two handguns with at least 1,200 rounds of ammunition each, at least four military knives and a kevlar per each member of household above 12 years of age. US citizens shall not register their firearms and ammunition as guns registration is gun confiscation, and shall own and carry their personal weapons without fear, following their derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms, recognized and protected in the second amendment to the US constitution. It is important for each US citizen in these perilous times to purchase and give a firearm as a gift to his or her relative or a friend if his or her income and savings allow. US citizens and residents should clearly understand and always remember that more personal weapons owned by private US citizens and residents equal less crimes and less domestic terrorism.

Furthermore, every American should create 8-year food store to be ready to any disruptions of food supply. Every American family should also purchase a separate residence, and if it possesses sufficient funds, at least a hectare of land per each family member, to learn vegetable and fruit gardening and to keep cattle and poultry wherever reasonable. Finally, every American family should sell the stocks of large corporations, presently overvalued at least 3 times through run away inflation - the consequence of FRS money printing - and put their savings beyond 3- to 6-month salary in cash, in 2/3 into gold and in 1/3 into silver to preserve their savings from run away inflation, which is inevitable, given the scale of money printing in the US and throughout the world. It is lawful for a US citizen to wound and kill a US official, representative, statesman who tries to forcefully confiscate his weapons, bearing neither legal nor moral responsibility, since it is lawful to kill in defense of movable property (Exodus 22:2). In dealing with American or foreign enemies, the appropriate way is: resist the devil and he will flee from you (James 4:7). Finally, it is important for US citizens who have appropriate funds at their disposal to establish a second residence in European states and to purchase property in Europe to be able to flee any federal persecution if such commences.

Some people strangely oppose to the US citizens taking responsible measures to protect their future and the future of their families, advising to focus on restoration of American liberty instead. Yet personal preparedness does not contradict taking collective actions to restore American liberty: in fact individual preparedness serves as a basis of taking collective actions to restore American liberty.

Furthermore, self-defense militias of the American people should be formed in all US states and districts. These militias should work independently or in association with the NRA and/or as a part of the US national guard to protect Christian faith and the Law of the Lord, customs and traditions of the American people, and the natural, derivative-natural, civil and traditional rights of US citizens and residents as well as the rights and authority of US states and districts against federal usurpation or foreign aggression. The federal, state and district government should not harass activists of self-defense militias of the American people, or try to disarm or dismantle self-defense militias of the American people. Self-defense militias of the American people should concentrate on identifying and reporting criminals and illegal immigrants in their communities, assisting the national guard of the borderline US states to protect the US border, and preparing and training to resist federal usurpation or foreign aggression. US State governors should facilitate the activities of self-defense militias of the American people in their states by promoting law enforcement training and military training for militia members in association with members of the US national guard and the US state police. The governors of US states should also develop contingency plans for the national guard of a US state to replace US army units for defense of their respective states, and should be ready to order the national guard of their respective states to resist any unconstitutional federal executive orders, laws or court decisions. Each US state shall have at least 20,000 organized, trained and armed US national guardsmen ready to be deployed within the state in 24 hours.

It is necessary to organize an effective lobbying effort against any attempts to ratify the UN arms trade treaty and to pass so-called gun control laws in the US Congress and the legislatures of US states. The NRA and the Republican party should use the ATT as an opportunity to educate US citizens about the fallacies of gun control, and seek reversal of existing unlawful statutes restricting the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms in the US Congress, the congresses of US states, and in US courts. It is also important for the NRA to conduct a public relations campaign to illustrate how wide availability of guns and respect for the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms reduces crime in republican nations as Switzerland, makes a republican nation prepared to resist foreign aggression, and liberates nations as in the case of free Libya, unjustly defamed by some in the US Congress.

It is important for US gun dealers and the national rifle association to reach to physically disabled US citizens who are willing and able to own and carry personal weapons and to offer reasonable discounts for purchases of suitable personal weapons to these physically disabled US citizens, who often become victims of crime and domestic terrorism. Reportedly, a new gun TV channel dedicated to sales of personal weapons to US citizens and residents begins to broadcast in the United States of America: it is important for this new gun TV channel to establish a weekly one hour show for physically disabled US citizens, marketing suitable personal weapons for self-defense purposes to these physically disabled US citizens, who often become victims of crime and domestic terrorism.

Furthermore, it is important for US citizens to disobey any executive orders of the US president, unlawfully restraining the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms. US citizens should also disobey any federal, state or local law requiring registration, confiscation or prohibition of firearms, since registration of firearms is unlawful under the second amendment to the US constitution. US citizens should also continue the fight in the US court system against any unlawful laws passed by state legislatures. If any law restricting the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms is passed by the US Congress, any executive order restricting the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms is made by the president of the United States, or any judgment of the US supreme court restricting the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms is made, specifically mandating registration, confiscation or prohibition of firearms, US citizens should not comply with the above-mentioned provisions, and the governors and legislatures of US states should nullify the above-mentioned provisions in the territories of their states by a state law, stating the provisions of the second and the tenth amendments to the US constitution as basis for nullification. It is important to gradually discard the faulty reasoning that federal law is always superior to state law: in fact, state law, made subject to its reserved powers and the constitution of the United States, can and should be superior to federal law, if it does not exceed state power and is not contrary to the US constitution. Such state law in such circumstances is legitimate exercise of state authority to prevent federal usurpation of the rights reserved to the states or to the people.

Similarly, if a state law restricting the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms is passed by state legislature, specifically mandating registration, confiscation or prohibition of firearms, US citizens should not comply with the provisions of such a state law, and legislatures of state districts should nullify the above-mentioned provisions of a state law in the territories of their districts by a district law, stating the provisions of the second, the tenth and the fourteenth amendments to the US constitution as basis for nullification. In such a case, a district law, made subject to the reserved powers of the people and the constitution of the United States, can and should be superior to a state law, if it does not exceed district power, is made to protect the civil rights of the citizens of the United States and is not contrary to the US constitution. Such a district law in such circumstances is legitimate exercise of district authority to prevent state usurpation of the rights reserved to the people by the Bill of Rights.

Furthermore, if a particular district law or an act, restricting the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms, is passed in a district, specifically mandating registration, confiscation or prohibition of firearms, US citizens should not comply with the provisions of such a law or an act, state legislature should abolish the district law by the state law, preventing an unconstitutional district law from entering into legal force. Alternatively, such a law should be challenged in a state or federal court to prevent it from entering into legal force.

The juries of US citizens shall not convict, fine, arrest, imprison, condemn to forced labor, condemn to forced medical treatment US citizens who possess and carry personal weapons - military knives, handguns, semi-automatic and automatic rifles, machine guns, grenades, portable grenade launchers, portable missile launchers, portable anti-aircraft missiles, portable anti-tank missiles, portable naval missiles - and appropriate munitions, without license or registration, applying jury nullification – power of the jury over both the law and the facts of the case - and respecting the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms of US citizens, recognized and protected in the second amendment to the US constitution, unless such US citizens are prohibited from possession and carrying personal weapons as a punishment for committing a felony crime, criminal in character, and not criminalized civil and political conduct, or declared criminally insane by US courts as a punishment for committing a felony crime, criminal in character, and not criminalized civil and political conduct.

Finally, if an international treaty is signed by the US president, restricting the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms, specifically mandating registration, confiscation or prohibition of firearms, such a treaty is invalid from its signing date, being contrary to the provisions of the US constitution, which are always superior to international treaties, US senate should not ratify such a treaty, US supreme court should strike down the provisions of such a treaty, US states should nullify such a treaty, and US citizens should not comply with the provisions of such a treaty.

Secondly, judging Christian churches should be established in every US district and a judging church should establish a Christian religious court in every US district. A Christian religious court should judge all civil cases with the value of disputed property not exceeding the market value of 14,700 ounces of silver if both sides of the case agree to the judgment. Furthermore, a judging Christian church should register births, deaths and marriages and should justify Christians who kill in the following circumstances, in accordance with the judgments of Lord God Jehovah, Lord Jesus Christ, Holy Spirit, bearing neither legal nor moral responsibility:

- it is lawful to take property, wound and kill those who commit the abominable deeds of sexual perversions (homosexuality (Leviticus 20:13), lesbianism (Leviticus 20:13), bestiality (Leviticus 20:15), incest (Leviticus 20:11-17), pedophilia (sexual relations with girls below 12 years of age) (Leviticus 20:2-3, Matthew 18:6)), abominations (child murders (abortions) (Leviticus 20:2-3, Exodus 21:22-25), change of gender (Book of Enoch Section XVII, Chapter 86, Section II, Chapter 10), cannibalism (Book of Enoch, Section II, Chapter 7,10), human cloning (Book of Enoch Section XVII, Chapter 86, Section II, Chapter 10)), intentional murder (Exodus 21:14), enslavement of men/women (Exodus 21:16) or selling of men/women to slavery (Exodus 21:16);
- it is lawful to wound and kill in defense of life (Exodus 21:14), liberty (Exodus 21:16), movable property, land up 100 hectares per man/family and real estate upon such land (Exodus 22:2), dignity from rape, which in its nature is enslavement (Exodus 21:16) and physical assault, which in its nature is attempted murder (Exodus 21:14);
- it is lawful for a US citizen to warn a foreign citizen, or a non-citizen, not born in the territory of the USA, to leave the territory of the USA, and if such a foreign citizen or a non-citizen does not leave on his or her own, subsequently forcefully repatriate such a foreign citizen or a non-citizen (Exodus 23:4). If such a foreign citizen resists repatriation, it is lawful to take property, wound and kill such a foreign citizen or a non-citizen, for such came to steal, kill and destroy (John 10:1,10; Exodus 21:14; Exodus 22:2);
- it is lawful for a US citizen to warn a foreign armed soldier to leave the territory of the USA, and if such an armed foreign soldier does not leave on his own, it is lawful to take property, wound and kill such a foreign armed soldier, he is an enslaver (Exodus 21:16);
- it is lawful for a US citizen(s) to take property, wound and kill soldiers of aggressive foreign nations and their armed collaborators in a war against foreign aggression until just peace is established, those who initiated an aggressive war punished, and the territorial integrity of the states against which an aggressive war was waged is restored (Exodus 17:14,16, I Samuel 15:3);
- it is lawful to wound and kill a government official who takes children from parents for the cause other than infliction of a physical disability or engaging a child into prostitution or production of pornography - he is an enslaver (Exodus 21:16);
- it is lawful to wound and kill those who forcefully impose electronic numbers for taxpayers and social security identification, forcefully impose any marks, numbers, writings, microchips upon human skin or inside a human body for any reason, forcefully collect and store biometric information as fingerprints, eye scan, DNA-samples, without a written court order supported by clear and compelling evidence, sufficient to accuse of felony a person from whom biometric evidence is collected - such are enslavers (Exodus 21:16);
- it is lawful to wound and kill a man-god and his followers who force men to worship him as god and forcefully impose any marks, numbers, writings, microchips upon human skin or inside a human body for any reason (Revelation 19:20-21);
- it is lawful to wound and kill a government official who arrests, imprisons, condemns to forced labor, condemns to forced medical treatment, wounds or kills in retaliation of exercise of the derivative-natural rights to absolute freedom of speech, freedom of peaceful assembly and association, freedom of Christian religion, the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and keep and bear arms - such is an enslaver (Exodus 21:16);
- it is lawful for a husband or a wife who has committed no adultery to wound and kill a wife or husband who has committed adultery (Leviticus 20:10).

A judging Christian church shall absolve the US citizens and residents who kill in the aforementioned circumstances of any legal or moral responsibility for their just deeds by an act of remission of sins. Furthermore, a judging Christian church shall begin to compile the lists of US citizens and residents residing in a district who committed the abominable deeds of sexual perversions (homosexuality, lesbianism, bestiality, incest, pedophilia (sexual relations with girls below 12 years of age)), abominations (child murders (abortions), change of gender, cannibalism, human cloning), intentional murder, enslavement of men/women or selling of men/women to slavery, and to put such lists to the internet for faithful Christians to avoid dealing with the doers of the abominable deeds.

Christian churches in US districts should promote home schooling for European (White) and Christian children, by establishing websites with home schooling resources in association with HSLDA and should establish at least one Christian non-government liberal art academy providing classical education, a Christian non-government trade academy teaching business trades and professions, and a Christian non-government technical college teaching technical sciences in each US district. These educational institutions should award their own qualifications, not certified by the state or certification agencies, and should specifically require its staff and students to be Christians.

Christian churches in US districts should establish at least one Christian charitable medical clinic in each US district, providing preventative medical care and basic medical care to patients on the basis of ability to pay and independent of US insurance schemes. This medical clinic should specifically require its staff and students to be Christians and train a sufficient number of midwives.

Christian churches in US districts and US states should establish citizens’ district and state councils, by electing two competent and moral representatives from each Christian church into the district council for the term of one year, and two competent and moral representatives from each district council into a state council for the term of two years. Each district and state council in association with appropriate non-government organizations should monitor and report legal acts of the US government infringing upon the natural rights, derivative-natural rights, civil rights, traditional rights of the citizens and residents of the United States, the rights and authority of US districts and states.

Specifically, citizens’ district and state councils should focus on:

- lobbying state governments to issue gold and silver coins and bullion, and passing legal tender laws authorizing gold and silver coins and bullion as legal tender in the territory of each state, valued at current market price expressed in US dollars;
- lobbying US state governments and the US federal government to repatriate all illegal immigrants from the territory of the United States and construct an appropriate fence on the US-Mexico border to eliminate long-term unemployment in the United States largely caused by mass illegal immigration;
- lobbying the US federal government to dissolve the NAFTA trade agreement and to focus on admitting Canadian provinces to the United States of America as new US states, if Canadian provinces desire this;
- repealing all existing legal statutes infringing upon the derivative-natural rights to absolute freedom of speech, freedom of peaceful assembly and association, freedom of Christian religion, the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and keep and bear arms, other civil rights of US citizens, districts and states, guaranteed by the Bill of Rights. In particular, repealing, together with the national rifle association and the US republican party, all restrictions on ownership and carrying of automatic rifles and machine guns by US citizens;
- prohibiting by state and federal law and preferably by constitutional amendments to the state and the US constitution, forceful imposition of electronic numbers for taxpayers and social security identification, forceful imposition of any marks, numbers, writings, microchips upon human skin or inside a human body for any reason, forceful collection and storage of biometric information as fingerprints, eye scan, DNA-samples, without a written court order supported by clear and compelling evidence, sufficient to accuse of felony a person from whom biometric evidence is collected;
- establishing the death penalty in all cases in US federal and state law as punishment of the doers of the abominable deeds of sexual perversions (homosexuality, lesbianism, bestiality, incest, pedophilia (sexual relations with girls below 12 years of age)), abominations (child murders (abortions), change of gender, cannibalism, human cloning), intentional murder, enslavement of men/women or selling of men/women to slavery, and absolving by US federal and state law from legal responsibility those who take property, wound and kill the doers of the abominable deeds of sexual perversions (homosexuality, lesbianism, bestiality, incest, pedophilia (sexual relations with girls below 12 years of age)), abominations (child murders (abortions), change of gender, cannibalism, human cloning), intentional murder, enslavement of men/women or selling of men/women to slavery;
- lobbying the US federal government to strengthen NATO and to admit Australia and New Zealand as NATO members if these nations wish so;
- establishing US foreign policy on the basis of US exceptionalism, making the US neither an imperial nation nor a part of the global government, but a great first-class regional power preserving its exclusive interests in Latin America and NATO military alliance, and building relations with all other nations on the basis of bilateral mutually beneficial peaceful cooperation, promoting regional economic integration, rather than global government or global governance schemes;
- promotion of restoration of the United States of America to its European (White), Christian and republican roots, and peaceful repatriation of the US citizens and residents of non-White ethnicity back to their respective nations or third nations, wherein those US citizens and residents can play a positive role in promoting political rights and freedoms and economic development;
- cooperating with the US Republican party to nominate competent and moral candidates to all district, state and federal government positions throughout the United States to provide economically and politically sound policy alternatives to the American people, consistent with Christian faith and the Law of the Lord, customs and traditions of the American people and American statecraft, autonomy, self-government, rights and authority of US states, districts and tribes, natural rights, derivative-natural rights, civil rights and traditional rights of US citizens and residents;
- cooperating with the US Republican party to propose to the US Congress a realistic debt restructuring and debt repayment plan as well as appropriate reduction in US federal spending;
- cooperating with the US Republican party to propose to the US Congress a realistic taxation reduction plan to gradually reduce federal taxes to 10% income tax, 10% social tax, and 10% customs tariff with the exclusion of all other taxes as US national debt is progressively paid;
- cooperating with the US Republican party to reduce the scope of the US federal government and gradually restore to states, districts and the American people the rights reserved to them by the 10th amendment to the US constitution;
- promotion of establishment of small and medium-sized American businesses hiring American citizens and producing goods on US soil in association with appropriate non-government organizations and financial institutions.

Repatriating illegal immigrants from the United States of America it is important not to treat illegal immigrants inhumanely. For example, the recent influx of illegal minors into the United States of America requires a reasonable approach. It is clear that illegal minors cannot stay in the United States of America, yet the repatriation cases of illegal minors shall be processed within one year, while illegal minors shall be adequately fed, clothed and housed, given one time grant of 1,000 USD on repatriation from the United States of America and wished a safe journey home: it is important for the US federal government to allocate a part of US economic assistance due to the countries from which illegal minors come to the United States of America to fund the costs of humane repatriation of illegal minors, which is in fact the best economic assistance of the United States of America towards these countries. It is also important to invite US charitable foundations willing to fund basic medical care, Spanish and English literacy programs and basic trade and professional training for illegal minors to deal humanely with them.

What should discontented US citizens who do not want to possess a firearm and want to live in a community without private firearms ownership do? First, such discontented US citizens can collectively purchase land and establish gated communities on privately-owned land, where firearms ownership can be temporarily restricted through voluntary agreements between the community and land owners or tenants, provided there is a place in a district, wherein such a community is established, wherein the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon of private US citizens and residents guaranteed by the second amendment to the US constitution is fully respected. Such a community can install panic rooms with bullet proof windows in every floor of every building, hire a private security firm or invite US state and district law enforcement to provide law enforcement services to the community. Alternatively, such discontented US citizens can lobby for a constitutional amendment reflecting their political ideas, although, given the popularity of firearms in the American society, such an amendment is unlikely to be passed. Thus, those Americans who do not want to live with firearms are free to do so, both individually and collectively, as well as to peacefully advocate their political views: they should not, however, conspire to interfere with the constitutional rights of other US citizens through unconstitutional and/or unlawful executive, legislative, or court acts, or through unconstitutional international agreements.

Indeed, from time to time the tree of American liberty has to be washed with the blood of tyrants and patriots, yet some consider this reasonable price of freedom to be excessive. However, the founders of the United States of America established otherwise and for good reasons, shared by every reasonable man and woman aware of the past: absence of widespread civilian ownership and carry of personal weapons in Paris, France led to more than a hundred unnecessary dead civilian French citizens murdered by islamic terrorists, absence of widespread civilian ownership and carry of personal weapons in China led to the heinous war crimes committed by Japanese imperialists against Chinese civilians and hundreds of thousands unnecessary dead civilian Chinese citizens killed by Japanese imperialists, among other mass murders committed against disarmed civilian population, foolish enough to believe the siren song of civilian disarmament. And genocide committed by the totalitarian states in the 20th century brought thousand times as many victims as die every year from criminals and terrorists in the United States of America. As American statesman Benjamin Franklin correctly observed, those who trade freedom for security, deserve neither and will get none.

Indeed, in this perilous times of a growing terrorist threat, growing foreign terrorist threat and a growing threat to the national defense of the United States of America from the Russian federation, or the military alliance of the Russian federation, China and Iran if such an alliance is created, it is obvious to every reasonable man and woman that a number of unconstitutional, unlawful and groundless proposals with regard to so-called gun control laws made by an American stateswoman, are highly detrimental to national defense, territorial defense and public safety in the United States of America, as well as to American liberty, easily misused to create an electronic database of US citizens, owning personal weapons, to subsequently confiscate personal weapons owned by US citizens, as gun registration is gun confiscation.

How should a US citizen react to this siren song of gun control and civilian disarmament, peddled by the American democratic stateswoman? It is important for each US citizen in these perilous times to purchase an additional machine gun with 12,000 rounds of ammunition, or an automatic rifle with 12,000 rounds of ammunition, or a semiautomatic rifle with 12,000 rounds of ammunition, or a handgun with 1,200 rounds of ammunition for himself and his family until there are two machine guns with 12,000 rounds of ammunition each, or two automatic rifles with 12,000 rounds of ammunition each, or two semiautomatic rifles with 12,000 rounds of ammunition each, two handguns with 1,200 rounds of ammunition each, four military knives and a kevlar per each family member above 12 years of age, as well as to purchase and to give a firearm as a gift to his or her relative or friend if his or her income and savings allow. US citizens and residents should clearly understand and always remember that more personal weapons owned by private US citizens and residents equal less crimes and less domestic terrorism.

How should an American citizen react to any gun confiscation scheme, either state or federal? An American citizen should at least shut himself in his house and prepare to shoot any enforcers of an unconstitutional gun confiscation scheme, justly killing in defense of his property: the blood of such enforcers is upon them. An American citizen should fight such enforcers to the last men, woman and child of his family, and should remember what judeo-bolsheviks did to the Russians, who foolishly permitted themselves to be disarmed, arresting and torturing them. Thus it is better to die free, fighting in dignity than to be tortured by such enforcers who routinely permit their inmates to be raped by negroes and other non-Whites, loosing dignity, for the worst federal enforcers can do to dead bodies is to violate them as US soldiers regularly do to dead Taliban freedom fighters and other dead enemies. Able American citizens should join self-defense militias of the American people, hunt and shoot down such enforcers of an unconstitutional gun confiscation scheme, and furthermore be prepared to hunt and shoot down all doers of the abominable deeds of sexual perversions (homosexuality, lesbianism, bestiality, incest, pedophilia (sexual relations with girls below 12 years of age)), abominations (child murders (abortions), change of gender, cannibalism, human cloning), intentional murder, enslavement of men/women or selling of men/women to slavery in their districts and states, eradicating the abominable from US soil bringing degeneracy and trouble, and should repatriate the jews and non-Whites from the United States of America to their nations or third countries. District and state councils should coordinate the activities of self-defense militias of the American people in resistance to gun confiscation schemes, together with patriotic district and state governments and the US national guard, until US soil is liberated and a gun confiscation scheme repealed. Subsequently, the US federal government should be restructured, reelected and reappointed, all unconstitutional legislation repealed and American liberty restored.

Thus, US nationalists, patriots, republicans, conservatives, fundamentalists and White men and women will successfully resist any gun registration, prohibition, or confiscation scheme proposed by the obama administration and coalition of zionists, masons, democrats, communists, socialists and coloreds that support it. US nationalists, patriots, republicans, conservatives, fundamentalists and White men and women will defend American liberty with firearms to the death, keeping and bearing their firearms in resistance and defiance of the UN arms trade treaty and any US presidential executive order. US nationalists, patriots, republicans, conservatives, fundamentalists and White men and women shall give a simple answer to all American and foreign enemies of the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms of US citizens, recognized and protected in the second amendment to the US constitution: you can get my gun from my cold dead hands.
fdtwain is offline  
Old May 9th, 2016, 03:51 AM   #53
Banned
 
fdtwain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Europe
Posts: 618
Lawlessness in California

Presently, a number of unconstitutional, unlawful and groundless bills were submitted to the legislature of California.

One of unconstitutional, unlawful and groundless California bill seeks to declare all semi-automatic rifles with magazines over 10 rounds of ammunition so-called assault weapons.

In fact, the words of the second amendment to the US constitution recognizing the derivative natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms as a civil right are clear:

“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed”

The second amendment to the US constitution recognizes and protects the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms of citizens of the United States, who keep and bear, buy, sell and transfer personal arms irrespective of purposes - that is, all arms and weapons that can be born by a man, including knives, handguns, semi-automatic and automatic weapons, machine guns, grenades, portable grenade launchers, portable rocket launchers, portable anti-aircraft missiles, portable anti-tank missiles, portable naval missiles, appropriate munitions and explosives. The second amendment to the US constitution does not apply to the advanced weapons that cannot be born by a man as tanks, military aircrafts and helicopters, warships: such weapons are owned collectively by the American people and belong to the US armed forces and the national guard of the US states. The second amendment to the US constitution does not apply to chemical, biological and nuclear weapons of mass destruction: these weapons are owned solely by the US federal government. The second amendment to the US constitution prohibits requirement of any registration or license as a condition for exercise the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms of citizens of the United States, who keep and bear, buy, sell and transfer personal arms irrespective of purposes - that is, all arms and weapons that can be born by a man, including knives, handguns, semi-automatic and automatic weapons, machine guns, grenades, portable grenade launchers, portable rocket launchers, portable anti-aircraft missiles, portable anti-tank missiles, portable naval missiles, appropriate munitions and explosives. Registration with the governments of US states can be required with regard to portable rocket launchers, portable anti-aircraft missiles, portable anti-tank missiles, portable naval missiles to allow an owner of a portable missile launcher, a portable anti-aircraft missile, a portable anti-tank missile, a portable naval missile to be swiftly drafted into the national guard of a US state for the purposes of territorial defense of the territory of a US state. With regard to all other personal weapons, including automatic weapons and machine guns, no restrictions are constitutionally permissible, and any registration requirements are constitutionally prohibited.

Another unconstitutional, unlawful and groundless California bill seeks to prohibit manufacture of personal weapons by US citizens and residents without permission by the California department of justice.

In fact, the words of the second amendment to the US constitution recognizing the derivative natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms as a civil right are clear:

“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed”

In fact, the second amendment to the US constitution recognizes and protects the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms of citizens and residents of the United States who manufacture personal weapons, that is, all arms and weapons that can be born by a man, including knives, handguns, semi-automatic and automatic weapons, machine guns, grenades, portable grenade launchers, portable rocket launchers, portable anti-aircraft missiles, portable anti-tank missiles, portable naval missiles, appropriate munitions and explosives, for private use and for sale by private US citizens and residents to private US citizens and residents. Licensing of manufacture and sale of personal weapons is applicable solely to US companies and US corporations with limited liability, so-called professional weapons dealers.

Another unconstitutional, unlawful and groundless California bill seeks to prohibit ownership of magazines with capacity exceeding 10 rounds, thereby endangering lives of hunters of large beasts, US citizens who defend themselves against criminals, the territorial defense of the state of California and Californian districts, and the national defense of the United States of America.

In fact, the words of the second amendment to the US constitution recognizing the derivative natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms as a civil right are clear:

“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed”

The second amendment to the US constitution recognizes and protects the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms of citizens of the United States, who keep and bear, buy, sell and transfer personal arms irrespective of purposes - that is, all arms and weapons that can be born by a man, including knives, handguns, semi-automatic and automatic weapons, machine guns, grenades, portable grenade launchers, portable rocket launchers, portable anti-aircraft missiles, portable anti-tank missiles, portable naval missiles, appropriate munitions and explosives. The second amendment to the US constitution does not apply to the advanced weapons that cannot be born by a man as tanks, military aircrafts and helicopters, warships: such weapons are owned collectively by the American people and belong to the US armed forces and the national guard of the US states. The second amendment to the US constitution does not apply to chemical, biological and nuclear weapons of mass destruction: these weapons are owned solely by the US federal government. The second amendment to the US constitution prohibits requirement of any registration or license as a condition for exercise the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms of citizens of the United States, who keep and bear, buy, sell and transfer personal arms irrespective of purposes - that is, all arms and weapons that can be born by a man, including knives, handguns, semi-automatic and automatic weapons, machine guns, grenades, portable grenade launchers, portable rocket launchers, portable anti-aircraft missiles, portable anti-tank missiles, portable naval missiles, appropriate munitions and explosives. Registration with the governments of US states can be required with regard to portable rocket launchers, portable anti-aircraft missiles, portable anti-tank missiles, portable naval missiles to allow an owner of a portable missile launcher, a portable anti-aircraft missile, a portable anti-tank missile, a portable naval missile to be swiftly drafted into the national guard of a US state for the purposes of territorial defense of the territory of a US state. With regard to all other personal weapons, including automatic weapons and machine guns, no restrictions are constitutionally permissible, and any registration requirements are constitutionally prohibited.

Another unconstitutional, unlawful and groundless California bill seeks to extend issuance of so-called non-constitutional gun violence restraining orders without due process of law in violation of the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms of citizens and residents of the United States, recognized and protected in the second amendment to the US constitution, and the civil right to due process of law of citizens of the United States, recognized and protected in the fifth amendment to the US constitution.

Finally, the Californian statesman offered an unconstitutional, unlawful and groundless ballot measure to Californian state referendum, seeking to impose background checks for sale of ammunition, the only result of which will be appearance of large black market for ammunition in California.

In fact, the words of the second amendment to the US constitution recognizing the derivative natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms as a civil right are clear:

“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed”

The second amendment to the US constitution recognizes and protects the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms of citizens of the United States, who keep and bear, buy, sell and transfer personal arms irrespective of purposes - that is, all arms and weapons that can be born by a man, including knives, handguns, semi-automatic and automatic weapons, machine guns, grenades, portable grenade launchers, portable rocket launchers, portable anti-aircraft missiles, portable anti-tank missiles, portable naval missiles, appropriate munitions and explosives. The second amendment to the US constitution does not apply to the advanced weapons that cannot be born by a man as tanks, military aircrafts and helicopters, warships: such weapons are owned collectively by the American people and belong to the US armed forces and the national guard of the US states. The second amendment to the US constitution does not apply to chemical, biological and nuclear weapons of mass destruction: these weapons are owned solely by the US federal government. The second amendment to the US constitution prohibits requirement of any registration or license as a condition for exercise the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms of citizens of the United States, who keep and bear, buy, sell and transfer personal arms irrespective of purposes - that is, all arms and weapons that can be born by a man, including knives, handguns, semi-automatic and automatic weapons, machine guns, grenades, portable grenade launchers, portable rocket launchers, portable anti-aircraft missiles, portable anti-tank missiles, portable naval missiles, appropriate munitions and explosives. Registration with the governments of US states can be required with regard to portable rocket launchers, portable anti-aircraft missiles, portable anti-tank missiles, portable naval missiles to allow an owner of a portable missile launcher, a portable anti-aircraft missile, a portable anti-tank missile, a portable naval missile to be swiftly drafted into the national guard of a US state for the purposes of territorial defense of the territory of a US state. With regard to all other personal weapons, including automatic weapons and machine guns, no restrictions are constitutionally permissible, and any registration requirements are constitutionally prohibited.

It is important for the legislature of California to reject all above-mentioned unconstitutional, unlawful and groundless California bills, as unconstitutional, unlawful and groundless, endangering lives of hunters of large beasts, US citizens who defend themselves against criminals, the territorial defense of the state of California and Californian districts, and the national defense of the United States of America and in clear violation of the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms of citizens and residents of the United States of America, recognized and protected in the second amendment to the US Constitution.

It is important for the governor of California if necessary to veto all above-mentioned unconstitutional, unlawful and groundless California bills, as unconstitutional, unlawful and groundless, endangering lives of hunters of large beasts, US citizens who defend themselves against criminals, the territorial defense of the state of California and Californian districts, and the national defense of the United States of America and in clear violation of the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms of citizens and residents of the United States of America, recognized and protected in the second amendment to the US Constitution.

It is important for the people of California to resolutely reject unconstitutional, unlawful and groundless ballot measure to Californian state referendum, seeking to impose background checks for sale of ammunition, as the only result of it will be appearance of large black market for ammunition in California.

What should American citizens and citizens of California who support firearms ownership and the second amendment to the US constitution do?

First, it is important to know and understand that the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms is established by God, proceeds from God and is only recognized and protected in the second amendment to the US constitution.

Lord God Jehovah said:

Book of Enoch, Section 17, Chapter 90
And I saw till a great sword was given to the sheep

Lord Jesus Christ said:

Luke 22:36
And he that hath no sword let him sell his garment and buy one

thereby allowing and ordering each worshiper of Lord God Jehovah and each worshiper of Lord Jesus Christ to own a personal weapon.

Luke 22:38 furthermore established that apostles of Lord Jesus Christ had purchased, owned and carried two personal weapons – swords - for themselves and their relatives, ownership and carry of which was prohibited to non-Roman citizens under the penalty of death, thereby legalizing ownership and carry of personal weapons by citizens and residents of any state.

Since all power is given unto Lord Jesus Christ in heaven and on earth (Matthew 28:1 and the earth and heaven shall pass away, but the words of Lord Jesus Christ will not pass away (Matthew 24:35), all American and foreign enemies of the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms of US citizens, recognized and protected in the second amendment to the US constitution, will not prevail, but the actions of all American and foreign enemies of the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms of US citizens, recognized and protected in the second amendment to the US constitution, will only significantly increase the number of personal weapons to be owned and carried by US citizens.

The text of the second amendment to the US constitution is clear:

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

This signifies that a US citizen is allowed to keep and bear, buy, sell and transfer personal weapons that can be kept and carried - military knives, handguns, semi-automatic and automatic rifles, machine guns, grenades, portable grenade launchers, portable missile launchers, portable anti-aircraft missiles, portable anti-tank missiles, portable naval missiles and appropriate munitions and explosives, without any license or registration.

Every American family and every Californian family should purchase guns: at least two machine guns or automatic rifles or semi-automatic rifles with at least 12,000 rounds of ammunition each, at least two handguns with at least 1,200 rounds of ammunition each, at least four military knives and a kevlar per each member of household above 12 years of age. US citizens shall not register their firearms and ammunition as guns registration is gun confiscation, and shall own and carry their personal weapons without fear, following their derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms, recognized and protected in the second amendment to the US constitution. It is important for each US citizen in these perilous times to purchase and give a firearm as a gift to his or her relative or a friend if his or her income and savings allow. US citizens and residents should clearly understand and always remember that more personal weapons owned by private US citizens and residents equal less crimes and less domestic terrorism.

Furthermore, every American and every Californian should create 8-year food store to be ready to any disruptions of food supply. Every American family and every Californian family should also purchase a separate residence, and if it possesses sufficient funds, at least a hectare of land per each family member, to learn vegetable and fruit gardening and to keep cattle and poultry wherever reasonable. Finally, every American family and every Californian family should sell the stocks of large corporations, presently overvalued at least 3 times through run away inflation - the consequence of FRS money printing - and put their savings beyond 3- to 6-month salary in cash, in 2/3 into gold and in 1/3 into silver to preserve their savings from run away inflation, which is inevitable, given the scale of money printing in the US and throughout the world. It is lawful for a US citizen to wound and kill a US federal, state or district official, representative, statesman or international official, representative, statesmen, who tries to forcefully confiscate his weapons, bearing neither legal nor moral responsibility, since it is lawful to kill in defense of movable property (Exodus 22:2). In dealing with American or foreign enemies, the appropriate way is: resist the devil and he will flee from you (James 4:7). Finally, it is important for US citizens who have appropriate funds at their disposal to establish a second residence in European states and to purchase property in Europe to be able to flee any federal persecution if such commences.

Some people strangely oppose to the US citizens taking responsible measures to protect their future and the future of their families, advising to focus on restoration of American liberty instead. Yet personal preparedness does not contradict taking collective actions to restore American liberty: in fact individual preparedness serves as a basis of taking collective actions to restore American liberty.

Furthermore, self-defense militias of the American people should be formed in all US states and districts. These militias should work independently or in association with the NRA and/or as a part of the US national guard to protect Christian faith and the Law of the Lord, customs and traditions of the American people, and the natural, derivative-natural, civil and traditional rights of US citizens and residents as well as the rights and authority of US states and districts against federal usurpation or foreign aggression. The federal, state and district government should not harass activists of self-defense militias of the American people, or try to disarm or dismantle self-defense militias of the American people. Self-defense militias of the American people should concentrate on identifying and reporting criminals and illegal immigrants in their communities, assisting the national guard of the borderline US states to protect the US border, and preparing and training to resist federal usurpation or foreign aggression. US State governors should facilitate the activities of self-defense militias of the American people in their states by promoting law enforcement training and military training for militia members in association with members of the US national guard and the US state police. The governors of US states should also develop contingency plans for the national guard of a US state to replace US army units for defense of their respective states, and should be ready to order the national guard of their respective states to resist any unconstitutional federal executive orders, laws or court decisions. Each US state shall have at least 20,000 organized, trained and armed US national guardsmen ready to be deployed within the state in 24 hours.

It is necessary to organize an effective lobbying effort against any attempts to ratify the UN arms trade treaty and to pass so-called gun control laws in the US Congress and the legislatures of US states. The NRA and the Republican party should use the ATT as an opportunity to educate US citizens about the fallacies of gun control, and seek reversal of existing unlawful statutes restricting the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms in the US Congress, the congresses of US states, and in US courts. It is also important for the NRA to conduct a public relations campaign to illustrate how wide availability of guns and respect for the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms reduces crime in republican nations as Switzerland, makes a republican nation prepared to resist foreign aggression, and liberates nations as in the case of free Libya, unjustly defamed by some in the US Congress.

It is important for US gun dealers, Californian gun dealers and the national rifle association to reach to physically disabled US citizens who are willing and able to own and carry personal weapons and to offer reasonable discounts for purchases of suitable personal weapons to these physically disabled US citizens, who often become victims of crime and domestic terrorism. Reportedly, a new gun TV channel dedicated to sales of personal weapons to US citizens and residents begins to broadcast in the United States of America: it is important for this new gun TV channel to establish a weekly one hour show for physically disabled US citizens, marketing suitable personal weapons for self-defense purposes to these physically disabled US citizens, who often become victims of crime and domestic terrorism.

Furthermore, it is important for US citizens to disobey any executive orders of the US president, unlawfully restraining the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms. US citizens should also disobey any federal, state or local law requiring registration, confiscation or prohibition of firearms, since registration of firearms is unlawful under the second amendment to the US constitution. US citizens should also continue the fight in the US court system against any unlawful laws passed by state legislatures. If any law restricting the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms is passed by the US Congress, any executive order restricting the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms is made by the president of the United States, or any judgment of the US supreme court restricting the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms is made, specifically mandating registration, confiscation or prohibition of firearms, US citizens should not comply with the above-mentioned provisions, and the governors and legislatures of US states should nullify the above-mentioned provisions in the territories of their states by a state law, stating the provisions of the second and the tenth amendments to the US constitution as basis for nullification. It is important to gradually discard the faulty reasoning that federal law is always superior to state law: in fact, state law, made subject to its reserved powers and the constitution of the United States, can and should be superior to federal law, if it does not exceed state power and is not contrary to the US constitution. Such state law in such circumstances is legitimate exercise of state authority to prevent federal usurpation of the rights reserved to the states or to the people.

Similarly, if a state law restricting the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms is passed by state legislature, specifically mandating registration, confiscation or prohibition of firearms, US citizens should not comply with the provisions of such a state law, and legislatures of state districts should nullify the above-mentioned provisions of a state law in the territories of their districts by a district law, stating the provisions of the second, the tenth and the fourteenth amendments to the US constitution as basis for nullification. In such a case, a district law, made subject to the reserved powers of the people and the constitution of the United States, can and should be superior to a state law, if it does not exceed district power, is made to protect the civil rights of the citizens of the United States and is not contrary to the US constitution. Such a district law in such circumstances is legitimate exercise of district authority to prevent state usurpation of the rights reserved to the people by the Bill of Rights.

Furthermore, if a particular district law or an act, restricting the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms, is passed in a district, specifically mandating registration, confiscation or prohibition of firearms, US citizens should not comply with the provisions of such a law or an act, state legislature should abolish the district law by the state law, preventing an unconstitutional district law from entering into legal force. Alternatively, such a law should be challenged in a state or federal court to prevent it from entering into legal force.

The juries of US citizens shall not convict, fine, arrest, imprison, condemn to forced labor, condemn to forced medical treatment US citizens who possess and carry personal weapons - military knives, handguns, semi-automatic and automatic rifles, machine guns, grenades, portable grenade launchers, portable missile launchers, portable anti-aircraft missiles, portable anti-tank missiles, portable naval missiles - and appropriate munitions, without license or registration, applying jury nullification – power of the jury over both the law and the facts of the case - and respecting the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms of US citizens, recognized and protected in the second amendment to the US constitution, unless such US citizens are prohibited from possession and carrying personal weapons as a punishment for committing a felony crime, criminal in character, and not criminalized civil and political conduct, or declared criminally insane by US courts as a punishment for committing a felony crime, criminal in character, and not criminalized civil and political conduct.

Finally, if an international treaty is signed by the US president, restricting the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms, specifically mandating registration, confiscation or prohibition of firearms, such a treaty is invalid from its signing date, being contrary to the provisions of the US constitution, which are always superior to international treaties, US senate should not ratify such a treaty, US supreme court should strike down the provisions of such a treaty, US states should nullify such a treaty, and US citizens should not comply with the provisions of such a treaty.

Secondly, judging Christian churches should be established in every US district and a judging church should establish a Christian religious court in every US district. A Christian religious court should judge all civil cases with the value of disputed property not exceeding the market value of 14,700 ounces of silver if both sides of the case agree to the judgment. Furthermore, a judging Christian church should register births, deaths and marriages and should justify Christians who kill in the following circumstances, in accordance with the judgments of Lord God Jehovah, Lord Jesus Christ, Holy Spirit, bearing neither legal nor moral responsibility:

- it is lawful to take property, wound and kill those who commit the abominable deeds of sexual perversions (homosexuality (Leviticus 20:13), lesbianism (Leviticus 20:13), bestiality (Leviticus 20:15), incest (Leviticus 20:11-17), pedophilia (sexual relations with girls below 12 years of age) (Leviticus 20:2-3, Matthew 18:6)), abominations (child murders (abortions) (Leviticus 20:2-3, Exodus 21:22-25), change of gender (Book of Enoch Section XVII, Chapter 86, Section II, Chapter 10), cannibalism (Book of Enoch, Section II, Chapter 7,10), human cloning (Book of Enoch Section XVII, Chapter 86, Section II, Chapter 10)), intentional murder (Exodus 21:14), enslavement of men/women (Exodus 21:16) or selling of men/women to slavery (Exodus 21:16);
- it is lawful to wound and kill in defense of life (Exodus 21:14), liberty (Exodus 21:16), movable property, land up 100 hectares per man/family and real estate upon such land (Exodus 22:2), dignity from rape, which in its nature is enslavement (Exodus 21:16) and physical assault, which in its nature is attempted murder (Exodus 21:14);
- it is lawful for a US citizen to warn a foreign citizen, or a non-citizen, not born in the territory of the USA, to leave the territory of the USA, and if such a foreign citizen or a non-citizen does not leave on his or her own, subsequently forcefully repatriate such a foreign citizen or a non-citizen (Exodus 23:4). If such a foreign citizen resists repatriation, it is lawful to take property, wound and kill such a foreign citizen or a non-citizen, for such came to steal, kill and destroy (John 10:1,10; Exodus 21:14; Exodus 22:2);
- it is lawful for a US citizen to warn a foreign armed soldier to leave the territory of the USA, and if such an armed foreign soldier does not leave on his own, it is lawful to take property, wound and kill such a foreign armed soldier, he is an enslaver (Exodus 21:16);
- it is lawful for a US citizen(s) to take property, wound and kill soldiers of aggressive foreign nations and their armed collaborators in a war against foreign aggression until just peace is established, those who initiated an aggressive war punished, and the territorial integrity of the states against which an aggressive war was waged is restored (Exodus 17:14,16, I Samuel 15:3);
- it is lawful to wound and kill a government official who takes children from parents for the cause other than infliction of a physical disability or engaging a child into prostitution or production of pornography - he is an enslaver (Exodus 21:16);
- it is lawful to wound and kill those who forcefully impose electronic numbers for taxpayers and social security identification, forcefully impose any marks, numbers, writings, microchips upon human skin or inside a human body for any reason, forcefully collect and store biometric information as fingerprints, eye scan, DNA-samples, without a written court order supported by clear and compelling evidence, sufficient to accuse of felony a person from whom biometric evidence is collected - such are enslavers (Exodus 21:16);
- it is lawful to wound and kill a man-god and his followers who force men to worship him as god and forcefully impose any marks, numbers, writings, microchips upon human skin or inside a human body for any reason (Revelation 19:20-21);
- it is lawful to wound and kill a government official who arrests, imprisons, condemns to forced labor, condemns to forced medical treatment, wounds or kills in retaliation of exercise of the derivative-natural rights to absolute freedom of speech, freedom of peaceful assembly and association, freedom of Christian religion, the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and keep and bear arms - such is an enslaver (Exodus 21:16);
- it is lawful for a husband or a wife who has committed no adultery to wound and kill a wife or husband who has committed adultery (Leviticus 20:10).

A judging Christian church shall absolve the US citizens and residents who kill in the aforementioned circumstances of any legal or moral responsibility for their just deeds by an act of remission of sins. Furthermore, a judging Christian church shall begin to compile the lists of US citizens and residents residing in a district who committed the abominable deeds of sexual perversions (homosexuality, lesbianism, bestiality, incest, pedophilia (sexual relations with girls below 12 years of age)), abominations (child murders (abortions), change of gender, cannibalism, human cloning), intentional murder, enslavement of men/women or selling of men/women to slavery, and to put such lists to the internet for faithful Christians to avoid dealing with the doers of the abominable deeds.

Christian churches in US districts should promote home schooling for European (White) and Christian children, by establishing websites with home schooling resources in association with HSLDA and should establish at least one Christian non-government liberal art academy providing classical education, a Christian non-government trade academy teaching business trades and professions, and a Christian non-government technical college teaching technical sciences in each US district. These educational institutions should award their own qualifications, not certified by the state or certification agencies, and should specifically require its staff and students to be Christians.

Christian churches in US districts should establish at least one Christian charitable medical clinic in each US district, providing preventative medical care and basic medical care to patients on the basis of ability to pay and independent of US insurance schemes. This medical clinic should specifically require its staff and students to be Christians and train a sufficient number of midwives.

Christian churches in US districts and US states should establish citizens’ district and state councils, by electing two competent and moral representatives from each Christian church into the district council for the term of one year, and two competent and moral representatives from each district council into a state council for the term of two years. Each district and state council in association with appropriate non-government organizations should monitor and report legal acts of the US government infringing upon the natural rights, derivative-natural rights, civil rights, traditional rights of the citizens and residents of the United States, the rights and authority of US districts and states.

Specifically, citizens’ district and state councils should focus on:

- lobbying state governments to issue gold and silver coins and bullion, and passing legal tender laws authorizing gold and silver coins and bullion as legal tender in the territory of each state, valued at current market price expressed in US dollars;
- lobbying US state governments and the US federal government to repatriate all illegal immigrants from the territory of the United States and construct an appropriate fence on the US-Mexico border to eliminate long-term unemployment in the United States largely caused by mass illegal immigration;
- lobbying the US federal government to dissolve the NAFTA trade agreement and to focus on admitting Canadian provinces to the United States of America as new US states, if Canadian provinces desire this;
- repealing all existing legal statutes infringing upon the derivative-natural rights to absolute freedom of speech, freedom of peaceful assembly and association, freedom of Christian religion, the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and keep and bear arms, other civil rights of US citizens, districts and states, guaranteed by the Bill of Rights. In particular, repealing, together with the national rifle association and the US republican party, all restrictions on ownership and carrying of automatic rifles and machine guns by US citizens;
- prohibiting by state and federal law and preferably by constitutional amendments to the state and the US constitution, forceful imposition of electronic numbers for taxpayers and social security identification, forceful imposition of any marks, numbers, writings, microchips upon human skin or inside a human body for any reason, forceful collection and storage of biometric information as fingerprints, eye scan, DNA-samples, without a written court order supported by clear and compelling evidence, sufficient to accuse of felony a person from whom biometric evidence is collected;
- establishing the death penalty in all cases in US federal and state law as punishment of the doers of the abominable deeds of sexual perversions (homosexuality, lesbianism, bestiality, incest, pedophilia (sexual relations with girls below 12 years of age)), abominations (child murders (abortions), change of gender, cannibalism, human cloning), intentional murder, enslavement of men/women or selling of men/women to slavery, and absolving by US federal and state law from legal responsibility those who take property, wound and kill the doers of the abominable deeds of sexual perversions (homosexuality, lesbianism, bestiality, incest, pedophilia (sexual relations with girls below 12 years of age)), abominations (child murders (abortions), change of gender, cannibalism, human cloning), intentional murder, enslavement of men/women or selling of men/women to slavery;
- lobbying the US federal government to strengthen NATO and to admit Australia and New Zealand as NATO members if these nations wish so;
- establishing US foreign policy on the basis of US exceptionalism, making the US neither an imperial nation nor a part of the global government, but a great first-class regional power preserving its exclusive interests in Latin America and NATO military alliance, and building relations with all other nations on the basis of bilateral mutually beneficial peaceful cooperation, promoting regional economic integration, rather than global government or global governance schemes;
- promotion of restoration of the United States of America to its European (White), Christian and republican roots, and peaceful repatriation of the US citizens and residents of non-White ethnicity back to their respective nations or third nations, wherein those US citizens and residents can play a positive role in promoting political rights and freedoms and economic development;
- cooperating with the US Republican party to nominate competent and moral candidates to all district, state and federal government positions throughout the United States to provide economically and politically sound policy alternatives to the American people, consistent with Christian faith and the Law of the Lord, customs and traditions of the American people and American statecraft, autonomy, self-government, rights and authority of US states, districts and tribes, natural rights, derivative-natural rights, civil rights and traditional rights of US citizens and residents;
- cooperating with the US Republican party to propose to the US Congress a realistic debt restructuring and debt repayment plan as well as appropriate reduction in US federal spending;
- cooperating with the US Republican party to propose to the US Congress a realistic taxation reduction plan to gradually reduce federal taxes to 10% income tax, 10% social tax, and 10% customs tariff with the exclusion of all other taxes as US national debt is progressively paid;
- cooperating with the US Republican party to reduce the scope of the US federal government and gradually restore to states, districts and the American people the rights reserved to them by the 10th amendment to the US constitution;
- promotion of establishment of small and medium-sized American businesses hiring American citizens and producing goods on US soil in association with appropriate non-government organizations and financial institutions.

Repatriating illegal immigrants from the United States of America it is important not to treat illegal immigrants inhumanely. For example, the recent influx of illegal minors into the United States of America requires a reasonable approach. It is clear that illegal minors cannot stay in the United States of America, yet the repatriation cases of illegal minors shall be processed within one year, while illegal minors shall be adequately fed, clothed and housed, given one time grant of 1,000 USD on repatriation from the United States of America and wished a safe journey home: it is important for the US federal government to allocate a part of US economic assistance due to the countries from which illegal minors come to the United States of America to fund the costs of humane repatriation of illegal minors, which is in fact the best economic assistance of the United States of America towards these countries. It is also important to invite US charitable foundations willing to fund basic medical care, Spanish and English literacy programs and basic trade and professional training for illegal minors to deal humanely with them.
What should discontented US citizens who do not want to possess a firearm and want to live in a community without private firearms ownership do? First, such discontented US citizens can collectively purchase land and establish gated communities on privately-owned land, where firearms ownership can be temporarily restricted through voluntary agreements between the community and land owners or tenants, provided there is a place in a district, wherein such a community is established, wherein the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon of private US citizens and residents guaranteed by the second amendment to the US constitution is fully respected. Such a community can install panic rooms with bullet proof windows in every floor of every building, hire a private security firm or invite US state and district law enforcement to provide law enforcement services to the community. Alternatively, such discontented US citizens can lobby for a constitutional amendment reflecting their political ideas, although, given the popularity of firearms in the American society, such an amendment is unlikely to be passed. Thus, those Americans who do not want to live with firearms are free to do so, both individually and collectively, as well as to peacefully advocate their political views: they should not, however, conspire to interfere with the constitutional rights of other US citizens through unconstitutional and/or unlawful executive, legislative, or court acts, or through unconstitutional international agreements.

Indeed, from time to time the tree of American liberty has to be washed with the blood of tyrants and patriots, yet some consider this reasonable price of freedom to be excessive. However, the founders of the United States of America established otherwise and for good reasons, shared by every reasonable man and woman aware of the past: absence of widespread civilian ownership and carry of personal weapons in Paris, France led to more than a hundred unnecessary dead civilian French citizens murdered by islamic terrorists, absence of widespread civilian ownership and carry of personal weapons in China led to the heinous war crimes committed by Japanese imperialists against Chinese civilians and hundreds of thousands unnecessary dead civilian Chinese citizens killed by Japanese imperialists, among other mass murders committed against disarmed civilian population, foolish enough to believe the siren song of civilian disarmament. And genocide committed by the totalitarian states in the 20th century brought thousand times as many victims as die every year from criminals and terrorists in the United States of America. As American statesman Benjamin Franklin correctly observed, those who trade freedom for security, deserve neither and will get none.

Indeed, in this perilous times of a growing terrorist threat, growing foreign terrorist threat and a growing threat to the national defense of the United States of America from the Russian federation, or the military alliance of the Russian federation, China and Iran if such an alliance is created, it is obvious to every reasonable man and woman that a number of unconstitutional, unlawful and groundless proposals with regard to so-called gun control laws made by an American stateswoman, are highly detrimental to national defense, territorial defense and public safety in the United States of America, as well as to American liberty, easily misused to create an electronic database of US citizens, owning personal weapons, to subsequently confiscate personal weapons owned by US citizens, as gun registration is gun confiscation.

How should a US citizen react to this siren song of gun control and civilian disarmament, peddled by the American democratic stateswoman? It is important for each US citizen in these perilous times to purchase an additional machine gun with 12,000 rounds of ammunition, or an automatic rifle with 12,000 rounds of ammunition, or a semiautomatic rifle with 12,000 rounds of ammunition, or a handgun with 1,200 rounds of ammunition for himself and his family until there are two machine guns with 12,000 rounds of ammunition each, or two automatic rifles with 12,000 rounds of ammunition each, or two semiautomatic rifles with 12,000 rounds of ammunition each, two handguns with 1,200 rounds of ammunition each, four military knives and a kevlar per each family member above 12 years of age, as well as to purchase and to give a firearm as a gift to his or her relative or friend if his or her income and savings allow. US citizens and residents should clearly understand and always remember that more personal weapons owned by private US citizens and residents equal less crimes and less domestic terrorism.

How should an American citizen react to any gun confiscation scheme, either state or federal? An American citizen should at least shut himself in his house and prepare to shoot any enforcers of an unconstitutional gun confiscation scheme, justly killing in defense of his property: the blood of such enforcers is upon them. An American citizen should fight such enforcers to the last men, woman and child of his family, and should remember what judeo-bolsheviks did to the Russians, who foolishly permitted themselves to be disarmed, arresting and torturing them. Thus it is better to die free, fighting in dignity than to be tortured by such enforcers who routinely permit their inmates to be raped by negroes and other non-Whites, loosing dignity, for the worst federal enforcers can do to dead bodies is to violate them as US soldiers regularly do to dead Taliban freedom fighters and other dead enemies. Able American citizens should join self-defense militias of the American people, hunt and shoot down such enforcers of an unconstitutional gun confiscation scheme, and furthermore be prepared to hunt and shoot down all doers of the abominable deeds of sexual perversions (homosexuality, lesbianism, bestiality, incest, pedophilia (sexual relations with girls below 12 years of age)), abominations (child murders (abortions), change of gender, cannibalism, human cloning), intentional murder, enslavement of men/women or selling of men/women to slavery in their districts and states, eradicating the abominable from US soil bringing degeneracy and trouble, and should repatriate the jews and non-Whites from the United States of America to their nations or third countries. District and state councils should coordinate the activities of self-defense militias of the American people in resistance to gun confiscation schemes, together with patriotic district and state governments and the US national guard, until US soil is liberated and a gun confiscation scheme repealed. Subsequently, the US federal government should be restructured, reelected and reappointed, all unconstitutional legislation repealed and American liberty restored.

Thus, US nationalists, patriots, republicans, conservatives, fundamentalists and White men and women will successfully resist any gun registration, prohibition, or confiscation scheme proposed by the obama administration and coalition of zionists, masons, democrats, communists, socialists and coloreds that support it. US nationalists, patriots, republicans, conservatives, fundamentalists and White men and women will defend American liberty with firearms to the death, keeping and bearing their firearms in resistance and defiance of the UN arms trade treaty and any US presidential executive order. US nationalists, patriots, republicans, conservatives, fundamentalists and White men and women shall give a simple answer to all American and foreign enemies of the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms of US citizens, recognized and protected in the second amendment to the US constitution: you can get my gun from my cold dead hands.
fdtwain is offline  
Old May 9th, 2016, 06:11 AM   #54
Senior Member
 
tristanrobin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: New Haven, CT
Posts: 20,955
Thanks from locke23, Sabcat and Hollywood
tristanrobin is offline  
Old May 9th, 2016, 06:39 AM   #55
Senior Member
 
imaginethat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Western Slope, Colorado
Posts: 53,205
fdtwain, your writing is actually pretty good, professional grade, but what do you hope to accomplish making post after long post that I promise no one is reading?
imaginethat is offline  
Old May 9th, 2016, 10:22 AM   #56
Banned
 
fdtwain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Europe
Posts: 618
Quote:
Originally Posted by imaginethat View Post
fdtwain, your writing is actually pretty good, professional grade, but what do you hope to accomplish making post after long post that I promise no one is reading?
My humble person, free, just and prosperous man of free conscience, speaks the word of truth to the Americans who seek to preserve the American republic, as established by the founders of the United States of America, who seek to resolutely and swiftly end the participation of the United States of America in all entangling international multilateral treaties and to build good trade and economic relations with all states, nations and peoples without exception on strictly bilateral basis, to resolutely and swiftly end the so-called war on terrorism, the misnamed war on islam, and all other foreign wars in which US armed forces take place, to close all US military bases overseas and to transfer them to the respective states, nations and people wherein these US military bases are situated and to withdraw all armed forces of the United States of America back to the territory of the United States of America by year 2022, and to eradicate from the American soil all doers of abominable deeds of sexual perversions (homosexuality (Leviticus 20:13), lesbianism (Leviticus 20:13), bestiality (Leviticus 20:15), incest (Leviticus 20:11-17), pedophilia (sexual relations with girls below 12 years of age) (Leviticus 20:2-3, Matthew 18:6), abominations (child murders (abortions) (Leviticus 20:2-3, Exodus 21:22-25), change of gender (Book of Enoch, section XVII, chapter 86; section II, chapter 10), cannibalism (Book of Enoch, section II, chapter 7,10), human cloning (Book of Enoch, section XVII, chapter 86; section II, chapter 10), intentional murder (Exodus 21:14), enslavement of men/women (Exodus 21:16) or selling of men/women to slavery (Exodus 21:16) against whom there are two or three witnesses and objective and sufficient evidence in accordance with the commandment of God (Exodus 9:4-6, Leviticus 18:24-30, Numbers 35:19, Matthew 5:18, Matthew 7:6, Revelation 13:10, Revelation 21:8 ) .

Furthermore, my humble person, bishop of Lord Jesus Christ, priest of Lord Jesus Christ, seer-priest of Lord God Jehovah, prophet of Lord God Jehovah forewarns the Americans about the events that will shortly come to pass and that are described in my article On present free elections and referendum of God

In fact, the Americans interested in the above-mentioned issues are able to read my posts from the beginning to the end.
fdtwain is offline  
Old May 9th, 2016, 11:36 AM   #57
Senior Member
 
Nwolfe35's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
Posts: 13,930
Quote:
Originally Posted by imaginethat View Post
fdtwain, your writing is actually pretty good, professional grade, but what do you hope to accomplish making post after long post that I promise no one is reading?
Technically his writing may be good, thematically he's not even off the deep end...he's jumped off the diving board and belly flopped into the parking lot next to the pool.
Thanks from tristanrobin and BubbaJones
Nwolfe35 is offline  
Old June 9th, 2016, 11:49 PM   #58
Banned
 
fdtwain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Europe
Posts: 618
Lawlessness in California

Presently, judges of the US appellate court for 9th district, having the long history of lawless court decisions, rendered unconstitutional, unlawful and groundless decision, falsely claiming that ordinary US citizens do not have the right to carry personal weapons concealed, which is without legal effect from the date of issuance, as contrary to clear wording of the second amendment to the US Constitution, that recognizes and protects the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms of US citizens and residents.

In fact, the words of the second amendment to the US constitution recognizing the derivative natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms as a civil right are clear:

“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed”

The second amendment to the US constitution recognizes and protects the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms of citizens of the United States, who keep and bear, buy, sell and transfer personal arms irrespective of purposes - that is, all arms and weapons that can be born by a man, including knives, handguns, semi-automatic and automatic weapons, machine guns, grenades, portable grenade launchers, portable rocket launchers, portable anti-aircraft missiles, portable anti-tank missiles, portable naval missiles, appropriate munitions and explosives. The second amendment to the US constitution does not apply to the advanced weapons that cannot be born by a man as tanks, military aircrafts and helicopters, warships: such weapons are owned collectively by the American people and belong to the US armed forces and the national guard of the US states. The second amendment to the US constitution does not apply to chemical, biological and nuclear weapons of mass destruction: these weapons are owned solely by the US federal government. The second amendment to the US constitution prohibits requirement of any registration or license as a condition for exercise the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms of citizens of the United States, who keep and bear, buy, sell and transfer personal arms irrespective of purposes - that is, all arms and weapons that can be born by a man, including knives, handguns, semi-automatic and automatic weapons, machine guns, grenades, portable grenade launchers, portable rocket launchers, portable anti-aircraft missiles, portable anti-tank missiles, portable naval missiles, appropriate munitions and explosives. Registration with the governments of US states can be required with regard to portable rocket launchers, portable anti-aircraft missiles, portable anti-tank missiles, portable naval missiles to allow an owner of a portable missile launcher, a portable anti-aircraft missile, a portable anti-tank missile, a portable naval missile to be swiftly drafted into the national guard of a US state for the purposes of territorial defense of the territory of a US state. With regard to all other personal weapons, including automatic weapons and machine guns, no restrictions are constitutionally permissible, and any registration requirements are constitutionally prohibited.

First, it is important to know and understand that the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms is established by God, proceeds from God, and is only recognized and protected in the second amendment to the US constitution.

Lord God Jehovah said:

Book of Enoch, Section 17, Chapter 90
And I saw till a great sword was given to the sheep

Lord Jesus Christ said:

Luke 22:36
And he that hath no sword let him sell his garment and buy one

thereby allowing and ordering each worshipper of Lord God Jehovah and each worshipper of Lord Jesus Christ to own a personal weapon.

Luke 22:38 furthermore established that apostles of Lord Jesus Christ had purchased, owned and carried two personal weapons – swords - for themselves and their relatives, ownership and carry of which was prohibited to non-Roman citizens, thereby legalizing ownership and carry of personal weapons by citizens and residents of the state.

Since all power is given unto Lord Jesus Christ in heaven and on earth (Matthew 28:1 and the earth and heaven shall pass away, but the words of Lord Jesus Christ will not pass away (Matthew 24:35), all American and foreign enemies of the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms of US citizens, recognized and protected in the second amendment to the US constitution, will not prevail, but the actions of all American and foreign enemies of the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms of US citizens, recognized and protected in the second amendment to the US constitution, will only bring more personal weapons to be owned and carried by US citizens.

This commandment authorizes every worshipper of Lord God Jehovah and every worshipper of Lord Jesus Christ, who is a citizen or a resident of the state, to own and carry personal weapons - military knives, handguns, semi-automatic and automatic rifles, machine guns, grenades, portable grenade launchers, portable missile launchers, portable anti-aircraft missiles, portable anti-tank missiles, portable naval missiles - and appropriate munitions without any registration or license and irrespective of any and all laws and legislation of the state, any and all international law, any and all laws of mankind (Matthew 18:18, Matthew 28:1.

This commandment orders every worshipper of Lord God Jehovah and every worshipper of Lord Jesus Christ, who is a citizen or a resident of the state, to purchase and own one or better two semi-automatic or automatic rifles with 12,000 rounds of ammunition each, or one or better two machine guns with 12,000 rounds of ammunition each, one or better two handguns with 1,200 rounds of ammunition each, and two or better four military knives per each member of the household above 12 years of age for self-defense purposes, national defense purposes against aggressive war, and defense of worshippers of Lord God Jehovah and worshippers of Lord Jesus Christ against enemies of Lord God Jehovah, Lord Jesus Christ, Holy Spirit (Matthew 18:18, Matthew 28:1.

This commandment orders all states to recognize and protect in the constitution of the state and the laws of the state the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms of citizens and residents of the state, in particular to authorize, legalize, recognize and protect in the constitution of the state and the laws of the state possession, carrying, sale, purchase and transfer of personal weapons - military knives, handguns, semi-automatic and automatic rifles, machine guns, grenades, portable grenade launchers, portable missile launchers, portable anti-aircraft missiles, portable anti-tank missiles, portable naval missiles - and appropriate munitions by any citizen and any resident of the state without any registration or license (Matthew 18:18, Matthew 28:1.

This commandment applies to personal weapons - that is, weapons that can be carried by a man. This commandment does not apply to nuclear, chemical and biological weapons of mass destruction (a weapon of mass destruction is a weapon, a single use of which destroys at least 10,000 persons). This commandment does not apply to battle tanks, military aircrafts, military helicopters, warships.

This commandment does not prohibit the courts of the state from prohibiting ownership and carrying of personal weapons to a citizen of the state, convicted in the court of law of the state of a felony crime, criminal in character, and not criminalized political or civil conduct, or recognized by the court of law of the state as criminally insane, having committed a felony crime, criminal in character, and not criminalized political or civil conduct, as a part of the punishment of a felony crime, criminal in character, and not criminalized political or civil conduct, or a resident of the state convicted in the court of law of the state of a felony crime, criminal in character, and not criminalized political or civil conduct, or recognized by the court of law of the state as criminally insane, having committed a felony crime, criminal in character, and not criminalized political or civil conduct, as a part of the punishment of a felony crime, criminal in character, and not criminalized political or civil conduct (Matthew 18:18, Matthew 28:1.

This commandment prohibits the state from imposing arbitrary prior restraint preventing the citizens and residents of the state from purchasing personal weapons.

This commandment does not prohibit the state from requiring by law professional weapons dealers either to carry out background checks to verify that a purchaser of a personal weapon is not convicted in the court of law of the state of a felony crime, criminal in character, and not criminalized political or civil conduct, and is not recognized by the court of law of the state as criminally insane, having committed a felony crime, criminal in character, and not criminalized political or civil conduct, or to require police certificate establishing that a purchaser of a personal weapon is not convicted in the court of law of the state of a felony crime, criminal in character, and not criminalized political or civil conduct, and is not recognized by the court of law of the state as criminally insane, having committed a felony crime, criminal in character, and not criminalized political or civil conduct (Matthew 18:18, Matthew 28:1.

This commandment allows a citizen of the state not to comply with all laws and all legislation of the state, prohibiting possession, carrying, sale, purchase and transfer of personal weapons - military knives, handguns, semi-automatic and automatic rifles, machine guns, grenades, portable grenade launchers, portable missile launchers, portable anti-aircraft missiles, portable anti-tank missiles, portable naval missiles - and appropriate munitions by any citizen of the state without any registration or license, bearing neither legal nor moral responsibility for that (Matthew 18:18, Matthew 28:1.

This commandment allows a citizen of the state to wound and kill an official, representative, statesman of the state who arrests, imprisons, condemns to forced labor, condemns to forced medical treatment, wounds or kills a (wo)man for not complying with any law or legislation of the state prohibiting possession, carrying, sale, purchase and transfer of personal weapons - military knives, handguns, semi-automatic and automatic rifles, machine guns, grenades, portable grenade launchers, portable missile launchers, portable anti-aircraft missiles, portable anti-tank missiles, portable naval missiles - and appropriate munitions by any citizen of the state without any registration or license bearing neither legal nor moral responsibility for that, justly killing in defense of life (Exodus 21:14), freedom (Exodus 21:16) from enslavement, dignity from physical assault (Exodus 21:14).

This commandment is binding upon worshippers of Lord God Jehovah and binding upon worshippers of Lord Jesus Christ.

Since all power is given unto Lord Jesus Christ in heaven and on earth (Matthew 28:1 and the earth and heaven shall pass away, but the words of Lord Jesus Christ will not pass away (Matthew 24:35), all American or international enemies of the second amendment to the US constitution will not prevail, but the actions of all American and foreign enemies of the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms of US citizens, recognized and protected in the second amendment to the US constitution, will only bring more personal weapons to be owned and carried by US citizens.

Any limitations on US constitutional rights are allowed under strict scrutiny standard, only to achieve objective and compelling state purpose, provided the means employed to achieve objective and compelling state purpose are necessary and proportionate.

It is obvious that unconstitutional, unlawful and groundless decision of the US appellate court for 9th district, falsely claiming that ordinary US citizens do not have the right to carry personal weapons concealed, does not seek objective and compelling state purpose, does not employ necessary and proportionate means, and is without legal effect from the date of issuance, as contrary to clear wording of the second amendment to the US Constitution, that recognizes and protects the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms of US citizens and residents.

It is important to appeal unconstitutional, unlawful and groundless decision of the US appellate court for 9th district, falsely claiming that ordinary US citizens do not have the right to carry personal weapons concealed, to the US Supreme Court, and for the US Supreme Court to reverse unconstitutional, unlawful and groundless decision of the US appellate court for 9th district, falsely claiming that ordinary US citizens do not have the right to carry personal weapons concealed, affirming the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms of US citizens and residents, recognized and protected in the second amendment to the US Constitution, for the above-mentioned reasons.

It is clear, given the history of unconstitutional, unlawful and groundless decisions of the US appellate court for the 9th district, subsequently reversed by the US Supreme Court, and growing dissatisfaction of a number of US states under jurisdiction of the US appellate court for the 9th district, in particular the state of Nevada, with unconstitutional, unlawful and groundless decisions of the US appellate court for the 9th district, that it shall be divided into two separate US appellate courts: the US Congress to which it pertains should swiftly consider this matter.

The legislatures of US states shall swiftly draft, submit to both houses of legislatures of US states and pass joint resolutions of both houses of the legislatures of US states, declaring null, void and without legal effect in its entirety from the date of issuance in the territory of respective US states unconstitutional, unlawful and groundless decision of the US appellate court for 9th district, falsely claiming that ordinary US citizens do not have the right to carry personal weapons concealed, affirming the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms of US citizens and residents, recognized and protected in the second amendment to the US Constitution, as being in violation of the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms of US citizens and residents, recognized and protected in the second amendment to the US constitution, and in violation of the tenth amendment to the US constitution.

The district councils of US states by appropriate resolutions of district councils of US states, made to protect the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms of US citizens and residents, recognized and protected in the second amendment to the US Constitution, subject to the reserved powers of the people under the tenth amendment to the US constitution and the constitution of the United States, shall declare without legal effect in its entirety from the date of issuance in the territory of respective US districts unconstitutional, unlawful and groundless decision of the US appellate court for 9th district, falsely claiming that ordinary US citizens do not have the right to carry personal weapons concealed, affirming the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms of US citizens and residents, recognized and protected in the second amendment to the US Constitution

US citizens and residents and California citizens and residents shall follow the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms, recognized and protected in the second amendment to the US constitution and shall not comply with unconstitutional, unlawful and groundless decision of the US appellate court for 9th district, falsely claiming that ordinary US citizens do not have the right to carry personal weapons concealed, bearing neither legal nor moral responsibility for that.

In particular, it is lawful for US citizens and residents to follow the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms, recognized and protected in the second amendment to the US constitution and to keep and carry open or concealed personal weapons - military knives, handguns, semi-automatic and automatic rifles, machine guns, grenades, portable grenade launchers, portable missile launchers, portable anti-aircraft missiles, portable anti-tank missiles, portable naval missiles and appropriate munitions and explosives, bearing neither legal nor moral responsibility for that. It is lawful for US citizens to wound and kill those who attempt to disarm them, justly wounding and killing in defense of property (Exodus 22:2) and bearing neither legal nor moral responsibility for that.

The juries of US citizens and California citizens shall not convict, fine, arrest, imprison, condemn to forced labor, condemn to forced medical treatment US citizens and residents who follow the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms, recognized and protected in the second amendment to the US constitution and to keep and carry open or concealed personal weapons - military knives, handguns, semi-automatic and automatic rifles, machine guns, grenades, portable grenade launchers, portable missile launchers, portable anti-aircraft missiles, portable anti-tank missiles, portable naval missiles and appropriate munitions and explosives – in the territory of the United States of America, applying jury nullification – power of the jury over both the law and the facts of the case and respecting the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms of US citizens, recognized and protected in the second amendment to the US constitution.

What should American citizens and citizens of California who support firearms ownership and the second amendment to the US constitution do?

First, it is important to know and understand that the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms is established by God, proceeds from God and is only recognized and protected in the second amendment to the US constitution.

Lord God Jehovah said:

Book of Enoch, Section 17, Chapter 90
And I saw till a great sword was given to the sheep

Lord Jesus Christ said:

Luke 22:36
And he that hath no sword let him sell his garment and buy one

thereby allowing and ordering each worshiper of Lord God Jehovah and each worshiper of Lord Jesus Christ to own a personal weapon.

Luke 22:38 furthermore established that apostles of Lord Jesus Christ had purchased, owned and carried two personal weapons – swords - for themselves and their relatives, ownership and carry of which was prohibited to non-Roman citizens under the penalty of death, thereby legalizing ownership and carry of personal weapons by citizens and residents of any state.

Since all power is given unto Lord Jesus Christ in heaven and on earth (Matthew 28:1 and the earth and heaven shall pass away, but the words of Lord Jesus Christ will not pass away (Matthew 24:35), all American and foreign enemies of the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms of US citizens, recognized and protected in the second amendment to the US constitution, will not prevail, but the actions of all American and foreign enemies of the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms of US citizens, recognized and protected in the second amendment to the US constitution, will only significantly increase the number of personal weapons to be owned and carried by US citizens.

The text of the second amendment to the US constitution is clear:

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

This signifies that a US citizen is allowed to keep and bear, buy, sell and transfer personal weapons that can be kept and carried - military knives, handguns, semi-automatic and automatic rifles, machine guns, grenades, portable grenade launchers, portable missile launchers, portable anti-aircraft missiles, portable anti-tank missiles, portable naval missiles and appropriate munitions and explosives, without any license or registration.

Every American family and every Californian family should purchase guns: at least two machine guns or automatic rifles or semi-automatic rifles with at least 12,000 rounds of ammunition each, at least two handguns with at least 1,200 rounds of ammunition each, at least four military knives and a kevlar per each member of household above 12 years of age. US citizens shall not register their firearms and ammunition as guns registration is gun confiscation, and shall own and carry their personal weapons without fear, following their derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms, recognized and protected in the second amendment to the US constitution. It is important for each US citizen in these perilous times to purchase and give a firearm as a gift to his or her relative or a friend if his or her income and savings allow. US citizens and residents should clearly understand and always remember that more personal weapons owned by private US citizens and residents equal less crimes and less domestic terrorism.

Furthermore, every American and every Californian should create 8-year food store to be ready to any disruptions of food supply. Every American family and every Californian family should also purchase a separate residence, and if it possesses sufficient funds, at least a hectare of land per each family member, to learn vegetable and fruit gardening and to keep cattle and poultry wherever reasonable. Finally, every American family and every Californian family should sell the stocks of large corporations, presently overvalued at least 3 times through run away inflation - the consequence of FRS money printing - and put their savings beyond 3- to 6-month salary in cash, in 2/3 into gold and in 1/3 into silver to preserve their savings from run away inflation, which is inevitable, given the scale of money printing in the US and throughout the world. It is lawful for a US citizen to wound and kill a US federal, state or district official, representative, statesman or international official, representative, statesmen, who tries to forcefully confiscate his weapons, bearing neither legal nor moral responsibility, since it is lawful to kill in defense of movable property (Exodus 22:2). In dealing with American or foreign enemies, the appropriate way is: resist the devil and he will flee from you (James 4:7). Finally, it is important for US citizens who have appropriate funds at their disposal to establish a second residence in European states and to purchase property in Europe to be able to flee any federal persecution if such commences.

Some people strangely oppose to the US citizens taking responsible measures to protect their future and the future of their families, advising to focus on restoration of American liberty instead. Yet personal preparedness does not contradict taking collective actions to restore American liberty: in fact individual preparedness serves as a basis of taking collective actions to restore American liberty.

Furthermore, self-defense militias of the American people should be formed in all US states and districts. These militias should work independently or in association with the NRA and/or as a part of the US national guard to protect Christian faith and the Law of the Lord, customs and traditions of the American people, and the natural, derivative-natural, civil and traditional rights of US citizens and residents as well as the rights and authority of US states and districts against federal usurpation or foreign aggression. The federal, state and district government should not harass activists of self-defense militias of the American people, or try to disarm or dismantle self-defense militias of the American people. Self-defense militias of the American people should concentrate on identifying and reporting criminals and illegal immigrants in their communities, assisting the national guard of the borderline US states to protect the US border, and preparing and training to resist federal usurpation or foreign aggression. US State governors should facilitate the activities of self-defense militias of the American people in their states by promoting law enforcement training and military training for militia members in association with members of the US national guard and the US state police. The governors of US states should also develop contingency plans for the national guard of a US state to replace US army units for defense of their respective states, and should be ready to order the national guard of their respective states to resist any unconstitutional federal executive orders, laws or court decisions. Each US state shall have at least 20,000 organized, trained and armed US national guardsmen ready to be deployed within the state in 24 hours.

It is necessary to organize an effective lobbying effort against any attempts to ratify the UN arms trade treaty and to pass so-called gun control laws in the US Congress and the legislatures of US states. The NRA and the Republican party should use the ATT as an opportunity to educate US citizens about the fallacies of gun control, and seek reversal of existing unlawful statutes restricting the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms in the US Congress, the congresses of US states, and in US courts. It is also important for the NRA to conduct a public relations campaign to illustrate how wide availability of guns and respect for the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms reduces crime in republican nations as Switzerland, makes a republican nation prepared to resist foreign aggression, and liberates nations as in the case of free Libya, unjustly defamed by some in the US Congress.

It is important for US gun dealers, Californian gun dealers and the national rifle association to reach to physically disabled US citizens who are willing and able to own and carry personal weapons and to offer reasonable discounts for purchases of suitable personal weapons to these physically disabled US citizens, who often become victims of crime and domestic terrorism. Reportedly, a new gun TV channel dedicated to sales of personal weapons to US citizens and residents begins to broadcast in the United States of America: it is important for this new gun TV channel to establish a weekly one hour show for physically disabled US citizens, marketing suitable personal weapons for self-defense purposes to these physically disabled US citizens, who often become victims of crime and domestic terrorism.

Furthermore, it is important for US citizens to disobey any executive orders of the US president, unlawfully restraining the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms. US citizens should also disobey any federal, state or local law requiring registration, confiscation or prohibition of firearms, since registration of firearms is unlawful under the second amendment to the US constitution. US citizens should also continue the fight in the US court system against any unlawful laws passed by state legislatures. If any law restricting the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms is passed by the US Congress, any executive order restricting the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms is made by the president of the United States, or any judgment of the US supreme court restricting the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms is made, specifically mandating registration, confiscation or prohibition of firearms, US citizens should not comply with the above-mentioned provisions, and the governors and legislatures of US states should nullify the above-mentioned provisions in the territories of their states by a state law, stating the provisions of the second and the tenth amendments to the US constitution as basis for nullification. It is important to gradually discard the faulty reasoning that federal law is always superior to state law: in fact, state law, made subject to its reserved powers and the constitution of the United States, can and should be superior to federal law, if it does not exceed state power and is not contrary to the US constitution. Such state law in such circumstances is legitimate exercise of state authority to prevent federal usurpation of the rights reserved to the states or to the people.

Similarly, if a state law restricting the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms is passed by state legislature, specifically mandating registration, confiscation or prohibition of firearms, US citizens should not comply with the provisions of such a state law, and legislatures of state districts should nullify the above-mentioned provisions of a state law in the territories of their districts by a district law, stating the provisions of the second, the tenth and the fourteenth amendments to the US constitution as basis for nullification. In such a case, a district law, made subject to the reserved powers of the people and the constitution of the United States, can and should be superior to a state law, if it does not exceed district power, is made to protect the civil rights of the citizens of the United States and is not contrary to the US constitution. Such a district law in such circumstances is legitimate exercise of district authority to prevent state usurpation of the rights reserved to the people by the Bill of Rights.

Furthermore, if a particular district law or an act, restricting the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms, is passed in a district, specifically mandating registration, confiscation or prohibition of firearms, US citizens should not comply with the provisions of such a law or an act, state legislature should abolish the district law by the state law, preventing an unconstitutional district law from entering into legal force. Alternatively, such a law should be challenged in a state or federal court to prevent it from entering into legal force.

The juries of US citizens shall not convict, fine, arrest, imprison, condemn to forced labor, condemn to forced medical treatment US citizens who possess and carry personal weapons - military knives, handguns, semi-automatic and automatic rifles, machine guns, grenades, portable grenade launchers, portable missile launchers, portable anti-aircraft missiles, portable anti-tank missiles, portable naval missiles - and appropriate munitions, without license or registration, applying jury nullification – power of the jury over both the law and the facts of the case - and respecting the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms of US citizens, recognized and protected in the second amendment to the US constitution, unless such US citizens are prohibited from possession and carrying personal weapons as a punishment for committing a felony crime, criminal in character, and not criminalized civil and political conduct, or declared criminally insane by US courts as a punishment for committing a felony crime, criminal in character, and not criminalized civil and political conduct.

Finally, if an international treaty is signed by the US president, restricting the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms, specifically mandating registration, confiscation or prohibition of firearms, such a treaty is invalid from its signing date, being contrary to the provisions of the US constitution, which are always superior to international treaties, US senate should not ratify such a treaty, US supreme court should strike down the provisions of such a treaty, US states should nullify such a treaty, and US citizens should not comply with the provisions of such a treaty.

Last edited by fdtwain; June 10th, 2016 at 12:15 AM.
fdtwain is offline  
Old June 9th, 2016, 11:49 PM   #59
Banned
 
fdtwain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Europe
Posts: 618
Secondly, judging Christian churches should be established in every US district and a judging church should establish a Christian religious court in every US district. A Christian religious court should judge all civil cases with the value of disputed property not exceeding the market value of 14,700 ounces of silver if both sides of the case agree to the judgment. Furthermore, a judging Christian church should register births, deaths and marriages and should justify Christians who kill in the following circumstances, in accordance with the judgments of Lord God Jehovah, Lord Jesus Christ, Holy Spirit, bearing neither legal nor moral responsibility:

- it is lawful to take property, wound and kill those who commit the abominable deeds of sexual perversions (homosexuality (Leviticus 20:13), lesbianism (Leviticus 20:13), bestiality (Leviticus 20:15), incest (Leviticus 20:11-17), pedophilia (sexual relations with girls below 12 years of age) (Leviticus 20:2-3, Matthew 18:6)), abominations (child murders (abortions) (Leviticus 20:2-3, Exodus 21:22-25), change of gender (Book of Enoch Section XVII, Chapter 86, Section II, Chapter 10), cannibalism (Book of Enoch, Section II, Chapter 7,10), human cloning (Book of Enoch Section XVII, Chapter 86, Section II, Chapter 10)), intentional murder (Exodus 21:14), enslavement of men/women (Exodus 21:16) or selling of men/women to slavery (Exodus 21:16);
- it is lawful to wound and kill in defense of life (Exodus 21:14), liberty (Exodus 21:16), movable property, land up 100 hectares per man/family and real estate upon such land (Exodus 22:2), dignity from rape, which in its nature is enslavement (Exodus 21:16) and physical assault, which in its nature is attempted murder (Exodus 21:14);
- it is lawful for a US citizen to warn a foreign citizen, or a non-citizen, not born in the territory of the USA, to leave the territory of the USA, and if such a foreign citizen or a non-citizen does not leave on his or her own, subsequently forcefully repatriate such a foreign citizen or a non-citizen (Exodus 23:4). If such a foreign citizen resists repatriation, it is lawful to take property, wound and kill such a foreign citizen or a non-citizen, for such came to steal, kill and destroy (John 10:1,10; Exodus 21:14; Exodus 22:2);
- it is lawful for a US citizen to warn a foreign armed soldier to leave the territory of the USA, and if such an armed foreign soldier does not leave on his own, it is lawful to take property, wound and kill such a foreign armed soldier, he is an enslaver (Exodus 21:16);
- it is lawful for a US citizen(s) to take property, wound and kill soldiers of aggressive foreign nations and their armed collaborators in a war against foreign aggression until just peace is established, those who initiated an aggressive war punished, and the territorial integrity of the states against which an aggressive war was waged is restored (Exodus 17:14,16, I Samuel 15:3);
- it is lawful to wound and kill a government official who takes children from parents for the cause other than infliction of a physical disability or engaging a child into prostitution or production of pornography - he is an enslaver (Exodus 21:16);
- it is lawful to wound and kill those who forcefully impose electronic numbers for taxpayers and social security identification, forcefully impose any marks, numbers, writings, microchips upon human skin or inside a human body for any reason, forcefully collect and store biometric information as fingerprints, eye scan, DNA-samples, without a written court order supported by clear and compelling evidence, sufficient to accuse of felony a person from whom biometric evidence is collected - such are enslavers (Exodus 21:16);
- it is lawful to wound and kill a man-god and his followers who force men to worship him as god and forcefully impose any marks, numbers, writings, microchips upon human skin or inside a human body for any reason (Revelation 19:20-21);
- it is lawful to wound and kill a government official who arrests, imprisons, condemns to forced labor, condemns to forced medical treatment, wounds or kills in retaliation of exercise of the derivative-natural rights to absolute freedom of speech, freedom of peaceful assembly and association, freedom of Christian religion, the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and keep and bear arms - such is an enslaver (Exodus 21:16);
- it is lawful for a husband or a wife who has committed no adultery to wound and kill a wife or husband who has committed adultery (Leviticus 20:10).

A judging Christian church shall absolve the US citizens and residents who kill in the aforementioned circumstances of any legal or moral responsibility for their just deeds by an act of remission of sins. Furthermore, a judging Christian church shall begin to compile the lists of US citizens and residents residing in a district who committed the abominable deeds of sexual perversions (homosexuality, lesbianism, bestiality, incest, pedophilia (sexual relations with girls below 12 years of age)), abominations (child murders (abortions), change of gender, cannibalism, human cloning), intentional murder, enslavement of men/women or selling of men/women to slavery, and to put such lists to the internet for faithful Christians to avoid dealing with the doers of the abominable deeds.

Christian churches in US districts should promote home schooling for European (White) and Christian children, by establishing websites with home schooling resources in association with HSLDA and should establish at least one Christian non-government liberal art academy providing classical education, a Christian non-government trade academy teaching business trades and professions, and a Christian non-government technical college teaching technical sciences in each US district. These educational institutions should award their own qualifications, not certified by the state or certification agencies, and should specifically require its staff and students to be Christians.

Christian churches in US districts should establish at least one Christian charitable medical clinic in each US district, providing preventative medical care and basic medical care to patients on the basis of ability to pay and independent of US insurance schemes. This medical clinic should specifically require its staff and students to be Christians and train a sufficient number of midwives.

Christian churches in US districts and US states should establish citizens’ district and state councils, by electing two competent and moral representatives from each Christian church into the district council for the term of one year, and two competent and moral representatives from each district council into a state council for the term of two years. Each district and state council in association with appropriate non-government organizations should monitor and report legal acts of the US government infringing upon the natural rights, derivative-natural rights, civil rights, traditional rights of the citizens and residents of the United States, the rights and authority of US districts and states.

Specifically, citizens’ district and state councils should focus on:

- lobbying state governments to issue gold and silver coins and bullion, and passing legal tender laws authorizing gold and silver coins and bullion as legal tender in the territory of each state, valued at current market price expressed in US dollars;
- lobbying US state governments and the US federal government to repatriate all illegal immigrants from the territory of the United States and construct an appropriate fence on the US-Mexico border to eliminate long-term unemployment in the United States largely caused by mass illegal immigration;
- lobbying the US federal government to dissolve the NAFTA trade agreement and to focus on admitting Canadian provinces to the United States of America as new US states, if Canadian provinces desire this;
- repealing all existing legal statutes infringing upon the derivative-natural rights to absolute freedom of speech, freedom of peaceful assembly and association, freedom of Christian religion, the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and keep and bear arms, other civil rights of US citizens, districts and states, guaranteed by the Bill of Rights. In particular, repealing, together with the national rifle association and the US republican party, all restrictions on ownership and carrying of automatic rifles and machine guns by US citizens;
- prohibiting by state and federal law and preferably by constitutional amendments to the state and the US constitution, forceful imposition of electronic numbers for taxpayers and social security identification, forceful imposition of any marks, numbers, writings, microchips upon human skin or inside a human body for any reason, forceful collection and storage of biometric information as fingerprints, eye scan, DNA-samples, without a written court order supported by clear and compelling evidence, sufficient to accuse of felony a person from whom biometric evidence is collected;
- establishing the death penalty in all cases in US federal and state law as punishment of the doers of the abominable deeds of sexual perversions (homosexuality, lesbianism, bestiality, incest, pedophilia (sexual relations with girls below 12 years of age)), abominations (child murders (abortions), change of gender, cannibalism, human cloning), intentional murder, enslavement of men/women or selling of men/women to slavery, and absolving by US federal and state law from legal responsibility those who take property, wound and kill the doers of the abominable deeds of sexual perversions (homosexuality, lesbianism, bestiality, incest, pedophilia (sexual relations with girls below 12 years of age)), abominations (child murders (abortions), change of gender, cannibalism, human cloning), intentional murder, enslavement of men/women or selling of men/women to slavery;
- lobbying the US federal government to strengthen NATO and to admit Australia and New Zealand as NATO members if these nations wish so;
- establishing US foreign policy on the basis of US exceptionalism, making the US neither an imperial nation nor a part of the global government, but a great first-class regional power preserving its exclusive interests in Latin America and NATO military alliance, and building relations with all other nations on the basis of bilateral mutually beneficial peaceful cooperation, promoting regional economic integration, rather than global government or global governance schemes;
- promotion of restoration of the United States of America to its European (White), Christian and republican roots, and peaceful repatriation of the US citizens and residents of non-White ethnicity back to their respective nations or third nations, wherein those US citizens and residents can play a positive role in promoting political rights and freedoms and economic development;
- cooperating with the US Republican party to nominate competent and moral candidates to all district, state and federal government positions throughout the United States to provide economically and politically sound policy alternatives to the American people, consistent with Christian faith and the Law of the Lord, customs and traditions of the American people and American statecraft, autonomy, self-government, rights and authority of US states, districts and tribes, natural rights, derivative-natural rights, civil rights and traditional rights of US citizens and residents;
- cooperating with the US Republican party to propose to the US Congress a realistic debt restructuring and debt repayment plan as well as appropriate reduction in US federal spending;
- cooperating with the US Republican party to propose to the US Congress a realistic taxation reduction plan to gradually reduce federal taxes to 10% income tax, 10% social tax, and 10% customs tariff with the exclusion of all other taxes as US national debt is progressively paid;
- cooperating with the US Republican party to reduce the scope of the US federal government and gradually restore to states, districts and the American people the rights reserved to them by the 10th amendment to the US constitution;
- promotion of establishment of small and medium-sized American businesses hiring American citizens and producing goods on US soil in association with appropriate non-government organizations and financial institutions.

Repatriating illegal immigrants from the United States of America it is important not to treat illegal immigrants inhumanely. For example, the recent influx of illegal minors into the United States of America requires a reasonable approach. It is clear that illegal minors cannot stay in the United States of America, yet the repatriation cases of illegal minors shall be processed within one year, while illegal minors shall be adequately fed, clothed and housed, given one time grant of 1,000 USD on repatriation from the United States of America and wished a safe journey home: it is important for the US federal government to allocate a part of US economic assistance due to the countries from which illegal minors come to the United States of America to fund the costs of humane repatriation of illegal minors, which is in fact the best economic assistance of the United States of America towards these countries. It is also important to invite US charitable foundations willing to fund basic medical care, Spanish and English literacy programs and basic trade and professional training for illegal minors to deal humanely with them.
What should discontented US citizens who do not want to possess a firearm and want to live in a community without private firearms ownership do? First, such discontented US citizens can collectively purchase land and establish gated communities on privately-owned land, where firearms ownership can be temporarily restricted through voluntary agreements between the community and land owners or tenants, provided there is a place in a district, wherein such a community is established, wherein the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon of private US citizens and residents guaranteed by the second amendment to the US constitution is fully respected. Such a community can install panic rooms with bullet proof windows in every floor of every building, hire a private security firm or invite US state and district law enforcement to provide law enforcement services to the community. Alternatively, such discontented US citizens can lobby for a constitutional amendment reflecting their political ideas, although, given the popularity of firearms in the American society, such an amendment is unlikely to be passed. Thus, those Americans who do not want to live with firearms are free to do so, both individually and collectively, as well as to peacefully advocate their political views: they should not, however, conspire to interfere with the constitutional rights of other US citizens through unconstitutional and/or unlawful executive, legislative, or court acts, or through unconstitutional international agreements.

Indeed, from time to time the tree of American liberty has to be washed with the blood of tyrants and patriots, yet some consider this reasonable price of freedom to be excessive. However, the founders of the United States of America established otherwise and for good reasons, shared by every reasonable man and woman aware of the past: absence of widespread civilian ownership and carry of personal weapons in Paris, France led to more than a hundred unnecessary dead civilian French citizens murdered by islamic terrorists, absence of widespread civilian ownership and carry of personal weapons in China led to the heinous war crimes committed by Japanese imperialists against Chinese civilians and hundreds of thousands unnecessary dead civilian Chinese citizens killed by Japanese imperialists, among other mass murders committed against disarmed civilian population, foolish enough to believe the siren song of civilian disarmament. And genocide committed by the totalitarian states in the 20th century brought thousand times as many victims as die every year from criminals and terrorists in the United States of America. As American statesman Benjamin Franklin correctly observed, those who trade freedom for security, deserve neither and will get none.

Indeed, in this perilous times of a growing terrorist threat, growing foreign terrorist threat and a growing threat to the national defense of the United States of America from the Russian federation, or the military alliance of the Russian federation, China and Iran if such an alliance is created, it is obvious to every reasonable man and woman that a number of unconstitutional, unlawful and groundless proposals with regard to so-called gun control laws made by an American stateswoman, are highly detrimental to national defense, territorial defense and public safety in the United States of America, as well as to American liberty, easily misused to create an electronic database of US citizens, owning personal weapons, to subsequently confiscate personal weapons owned by US citizens, as gun registration is gun confiscation.

How should a US citizen react to this siren song of gun control and civilian disarmament, peddled by the American democratic stateswoman? It is important for each US citizen in these perilous times to purchase an additional machine gun with 12,000 rounds of ammunition, or an automatic rifle with 12,000 rounds of ammunition, or a semiautomatic rifle with 12,000 rounds of ammunition, or a handgun with 1,200 rounds of ammunition for himself and his family until there are two machine guns with 12,000 rounds of ammunition each, or two automatic rifles with 12,000 rounds of ammunition each, or two semiautomatic rifles with 12,000 rounds of ammunition each, two handguns with 1,200 rounds of ammunition each, four military knives and a kevlar per each family member above 12 years of age, as well as to purchase and to give a firearm as a gift to his or her relative or friend if his or her income and savings allow. US citizens and residents should clearly understand and always remember that more personal weapons owned by private US citizens and residents equal less crimes and less domestic terrorism.

How should an American citizen react to any gun confiscation scheme, either state or federal? An American citizen should at least shut himself in his house and prepare to shoot any enforcers of an unconstitutional gun confiscation scheme, justly killing in defense of his property: the blood of such enforcers is upon them. An American citizen should fight such enforcers to the last men, woman and child of his family, and should remember what judeo-bolsheviks did to the Russians, who foolishly permitted themselves to be disarmed, arresting and torturing them. Thus it is better to die free, fighting in dignity than to be tortured by such enforcers who routinely permit their inmates to be raped by negroes and other non-Whites, loosing dignity, for the worst federal enforcers can do to dead bodies is to violate them as US soldiers regularly do to dead Taliban freedom fighters and other dead enemies. Able American citizens should join self-defense militias of the American people, hunt and shoot down such enforcers of an unconstitutional gun confiscation scheme, and furthermore be prepared to hunt and shoot down all doers of the abominable deeds of sexual perversions (homosexuality, lesbianism, bestiality, incest, pedophilia (sexual relations with girls below 12 years of age)), abominations (child murders (abortions), change of gender, cannibalism, human cloning), intentional murder, enslavement of men/women or selling of men/women to slavery in their districts and states, eradicating the abominable from US soil bringing degeneracy and trouble, and should repatriate the jews and non-Whites from the United States of America to their nations or third countries. District and state councils should coordinate the activities of self-defense militias of the American people in resistance to gun confiscation schemes, together with patriotic district and state governments and the US national guard, until US soil is liberated and a gun confiscation scheme repealed. Subsequently, the US federal government should be restructured, reelected and reappointed, all unconstitutional legislation repealed and American liberty restored.

Thus, US nationalists, patriots, republicans, conservatives, fundamentalists and White men and women will successfully resist any gun registration, prohibition, or confiscation scheme proposed by the obama administration and coalition of zionists, masons, democrats, communists, socialists and coloreds that support it. US nationalists, patriots, republicans, conservatives, fundamentalists and White men and women will defend American liberty with firearms to the death, keeping and bearing their firearms in resistance and defiance of the UN arms trade treaty and any US presidential executive order. US nationalists, patriots, republicans, conservatives, fundamentalists and White men and women shall give a simple answer to all American and foreign enemies of the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms of US citizens, recognized and protected in the second amendment to the US constitution: you can get my gun from my cold dead hands.
fdtwain is offline  
Old June 10th, 2016, 12:17 AM   #60
Senior Member
 
Twisted Sister's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Brown Township, Ohio
Posts: 9,609
Quote:
Originally Posted by goober View Post
Rather than cut and paste huge screeds, that frankly, no one is going to read, try to pick a topic, and link to some information on that topic.
But keep it succinct, because this isn't a doctoral thesis forum.
I knew what it was about after reading the first paragraph but scan read it anyway. Whomever wrote it has years of 'English Writing' higher education.
Twisted Sister is offline  
Reply

  Defending The Truth Political Forum > Political Issues > Money and Finance > Economics

Tags
american, defending, freedom



Search tags for this page
Click on a term to search for related topics.
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Will Native American Religious Freedom Count As Much As Hobby Lobby's? skews13 Current Events 13 July 27th, 2015 06:05 AM
If burning the American Flag is considered Freedom of Speech, FOXNEWS Current Events 64 December 30th, 2013 05:35 AM
A New Birth of American Freedom sumara Current Events 9 July 8th, 2013 11:44 AM
Government Freedom Cartoon: "Make Mine Freedom" Dude111 Political Talk 0 November 29th, 2010 09:39 PM


Facebook Twitter RSS Feed



Copyright © 2005-2013 Defending The Truth. All rights reserved.