Political Forums  

Go Back   Defending The Truth Political Forum > Political Issues > Money and Finance > Economics


Thanks Tree11Thanks
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old April 16th, 2016, 08:02 PM   #1
Banned
 
fdtwain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Europe
Posts: 618
Defending American freedom

Insecurity in America

America is regularly facing terrorist attacks, mass shootings and other spectacular crimes. Contrary to the claims of American federal agencies, the reasons for these attacks are not absence of appropriate legal instruments to address them. On the contrary, the growing number of terrorist attacks and spectacular crimes is the result of growing disrespect of American federal agencies towards the constitutional rights of American citizens.

The Al-Qaeda attacks upon the United States in 2001, which could have been prevented, had US federal agencies acted upon the advance warning given to them by a number of international intelligence agencies, including European intelligence agencies and Israeli mossad, were used as a pretext for the unprecedented and unlawful infringements upon the constitutional rights of American citizens.

First, the infamous patriot act was passed, even though the majority of US representatives and senators did not read it, infringing upon the numerous constitutional rights of American citizens protected in the first 10 amendments to the US constitution. The patriot act has not made the US safe, contrary to the false claims of its supporters in the Bush administration, quite the opposite: violation of the constitutional rights of American citizens has failed to deter numerous terrorist acts and politically-motivated murders carried out within the United States by foreign intelligence agencies, militant groups and international economic, social and ethnic elites, the last of which was the Tsarnaev terrorist attack, which could well have been organized by the Russian-appointed Chechenian warlord kadyrov, who ordered a number of assassinations of the Chechenians to be carried out in Turkey and Europe. It is obvious that the patriot act in its entirety should be swiftly repealed, as it infringes upon numerous constitutional rights of American citizens, protected in the first 10 amendments to the US constitution and has failed to make the United States of America safe.

Second, the department of homeland security was created out of 22 independent agencies that were kept separate for a good reason, which reportedly created an unconstitutional national police force. The department of homeland security has failed to make the United States of America safer, as numerous mass shootings throughout the United States indicated, and should be abolished. Some of the federal agencies comprising the department of homeland security, in particular, the infamous ATF that has committed grave crimes against American citizens, should be abolished outright and their activities investigated by the US Congress, other federal agencies should regain their independence. The record of the zionist ex-head of the department of homeland security michael chertoff should be investigated by an independent prosecutor appointed to determine whether the constitutional rights of the United States citizens suspected of so-called domestic terrorism - that is, American dissidents - were violated by the department of homeland security employees issuing the open report to the US Congress.

Third, the aggressive wars against Iraq and Afghanistan were launched on the basis of evidence that was falsified by a group of zionist neoconservative employees and foreigners led by jewish neoconservative paul wolfowitz. The decision to wage aggressive wars against Iraq and Afghanistan was made without proper declaration of war by the US Congress and over the objections of many moral and competent American statesmen, in particular, republican congressman Ron Paul. It was of course an erroneous decision, peddled by brzezinski among others, leading to the continuation of the civil war in Iraq to this day, the US and NATO military defeat in Afghanistan, and the necessity for the regional military intervention to defeat the bloody and blasphemous assad regime and prevent a large regional war, as Syria was destabilized, once Iraq was attacked. Currently, complete US withdrawal from Afghanistan and swift transferal of government authority in Afghanistan to the victorious Taliban legitimate government of Afghanistan, supported by 70% of the Afghani population and provision of advanced personal weapons to Syrian freedom fighters, establishment of one or two non-flight zones, especially from the Syrian-Turkish borders to the city of Aleppo, and undertaking guided missile strikes upon assadite air bases to ground assadite helicopters and aircrafts to permit Syrian freedom fighters to swiftly remove the bloody and blasphemous assad regime and to destroy Syrian chemical weapons of mass destruction are required to complete these two unnecessary wars. Regretfully, a wise advice of the republican congressman Ron Paul to issue the letter of reprisal for Osama bin Laden after his terrorist act in the United States was not heard at that time. Furthermore, the so-called war on terrorism, the misnamed war on islam, should be officially declared to be over by the United States.

Fourth, US intelligence and law enforcement agencies routinely violate the US constitution, conspiring with foreign intelligence and law enforcement agencies to violate the constitutional rights of US citizens and natural rights and derivative-natural rights of foreign citizens, endangering the constitutionally protected rights and freedoms of US citizens and the republican constitutional order of the United States of America.

In particular, the CIA ran illegal torture, kidnapping and rendition operations in a number of European, Latin American, Middle Eastern and African countries, kidnapping, torturing and murdering thousands of foreign citizens. Torture is cruel and unusual punishment, prohibited by the US constitution, and kidnapping, slavery and murder are capital federal crimes in the United States, punished by a death penalty in all cases. The US Congress should appoint an independent congressional prosecutor to thoroughly clean the CIA, to compile, present to Congress and disseminate to the American people the report of CIA illegal activities, in particular, torture, kidnapping and rendition operations, and at least to dismiss from US government positions all CIA operatives involved in torture, kidnapping and rendition operations. The fact that other intelligence agencies do so should not lower US constitutional standards, in particular, prohibition of torture, kidnapping and murder of those who did not commit the abominable deeds of sexual perversions (homosexuality, lesbianism, bestiality, incest, pedophilia (sexual relations with girls below 12 years of age)), abominations (child murders (abortions), change of gender, cannibalism, human cloning), intentional murder, enslavement of men/women or selling of men/women to slavery.

The NSA as it is spectacularly reported is engaging in fishing expeditions, recording and analyzing all internet traffic and phone messages throughout the United States, and reportedly compiling the extended databases on US and foreign citizens, permitting to arbitrary and without due process of law deny and extend certain privileges and rights to them – the activities that are prohibited in the fourth amendment to the US constitution. Recording and analyzing internet traffic and phone messages is permitted solely subject to a court order issued upon a probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized that is with regard to particular persons and places for federal felony investigations by the FBI or foreign intelligence purposes by the NSA. Situation in the NSA is particularly dangerous, since the extended databases on US and foreign citizens it has compiled permits to target US citizens for unlawful prosecution or assassination, and even create a totalitarian surveillance state in the USA, not dissimilar to the one described in chapter 13 of the Book of Revelation.

There are also unconfirmed reports of murders of technical and IT specialists and whistleblowers, in particular, in Europe, who reported to their peoples and the American people the dangers of the constitutionally prohibited activities in which the NSA routinely engages or refused to take part in such activities. The case of Mr. Snowden, who decided to report to the American people in a spectacular manner the violations of constitutionally protected rights by the NSA, will hopefully have a positive ending. Mr. Snowden is of course not a fugitive from justice, as political crimes as espionage, incitement of hatred, incitement to violence or terrorism, insider trading, extremism, etc. are not common crimes that can be pursued internationally, but criminalized conduct specific to a particular nation, which a nation can pursue solely with regard to its citizens, who voluntarily accepted citizenship of a nation, in national courts, while justice refers to acts criminal in nature, which all civilized nations have regarded in the past and still regard as criminal, i.e., intentional murder, rape, physical assault, kidnapping, slavery, piracy, etc. Regretfully, in modern world some try to make political crimes into common crimes, which is not possible, simply because what is espionage or incitement in one country may not be regarded as espionage and incitement in another country, and do not refer to the conduct condemned internationally, even if some wish to condemn such conduct internationally, but refer to the conduct which some nations reasonably may tolerate or even justify in particular political circumstances. Similarly, the fact that Mr. Snowden may have cooperated with foreign intelligence agencies as some suggest, and his strange desire to seek a refuge with the Russian dictatorship, which monitors the behavior of its citizens and violates their natural rights, derivative-natural rights, and civil rights in a far greater degree than the federal government of the United States, do not change the fact that he reports genuine violations of the constitutional rights of US citizens by the NSA. Thus, if Mr. Snowden returns to the US, he may face trial for espionage, if he indeed is a foreign spy, but the United States of America cannot demand his extradition, as he is not a fugitive from justice, but a genuine American dissident unhappy with what any reasonable man may objectively regard as systemic violations of the constitutional rights of US citizens by a US federal agency.

A reasonable solution will be for Venezuela to grant Mr. Snowden permanent residence and issue an appropriate permanent residence permit in accordance with the wishes of its venerated diseased president, Hugo Chavez, and to book a charter flight for Mr. Snowden to fly to Venezuela, avoiding the territory of the USA, Canada and the EU and EFTA nations. If this happens, there shall be no conspiracies to prevent Mr. Snowden from traveling to his new homeland as with diversion of the plane of the Bolivian president Evo Morales, which is not acceptable and only fuels anti-Americanism and Euroscepticism in America. Regretfully, the Greek technicians murdered by MI6, who threatened to reveal the system of monitoring of cell phones in Greece by the NSA and European intelligence agencies, were not as fortunate as Mr. Snowden.

More importantly, the US Congress shall hold a congressional hearing on the NSA, and develop a bill to restrain its activities in accordance with the provisions of the fourth amendment to the US constitution and destroy the extensive NSA databases on US citizens and foreign citizens who are not persons of interest in foreign intelligence gathering activities, and see that this bill is actually implemented in the NSA. NSA fishing expeditions should end because they are very dangerous to the constitutional rights of US citizens and US republican system of government. There are reportedly ties to mossad-affiliated businesses in the NSA: these ties should end.

The FBI is reportedly regularly conspiring with foreign law enforcement agencies to entrap US citizens, entice US citizens into the EU nations to have them imprisoned or murdered by European law enforcement or intelligence agencies in violation of their constitutional rights. Especially pronounced such criminal activities of the FBI have become under its present head Robert Mueller. A case in point is the story of Mr. Gary Lauck, an American national-socialist, whose travel plans were reported by the FBI to the EU nations that arrested him and tried him essentially for his national-socialist beliefs, constitutionally protected in the United States, sentencing him to four years in prison, and the government of the United States failed to protest the unlawful and groundless sentence with regard to the US citizen whose constitutional rights the government of the United States is obliged to protect by law, whether in the United States or abroad. It is obvious that the FBI reporting of Mr. Gary Lauck’s travel plans to the EU nations constitutes violation of US law and abuse of power of the US federal government, for which criminal charges with regard to those responsible may be warranted. However reprehensible Mr. Gary Lauck’s view may be, he is entitled to the protection of US law and the US diplomatic service, and respect of his constitutional rights by the US government, especially given that the EU nations could have simply refused him entry to their territory if unwilling to tolerate his activities on their territory.

The FBI is engaged in a number of unwarranted investigations of legitimate US civil associations and churches, reportedly upon pressure by zionist, jewish and Israeli groups, i.e., groundlessly classifying the national alliance - a US civil association founded by a doctor of physics - as a terrorist group, because of some violent acts committed by the former members of the national alliance, over whom the national alliance had no control or oversight. As a result, trumpeted charges were issued with regard to US citizen Chester Doles, a national alliance activist, and he was imprisoned essentially for his constitutionally protected political views. A church called Aryan nations, established by a reputable US citizen and a famous inventor Richard Butler, is regularly called a terrorist organization because its members hold to constitutionally protected White separatist views. Finally, the pastor of another religious group called Creativity church, and a lawyer by training, Matthew Hale, was unlawfully and groundlessly sentenced to 40-year imprisonment, allegedly for conspiring to kill a federal judge, although no evidence of such criminal conspiracy whatsoever was presented at his jury trial, and the whole case was based on surmises by a federal informant, seeking to entrap Matthew Hale, while Matthew Hale specifically denied participation in his criminal conspiracy. However repugnant are his views, Mr. Hale is entitled to his constitutional rights, including the right to a jury of his peers, which as he truthfully claimed was denied to him, and to have his guilt to be proven beyond reasonable doubt by objective and compelling physical evidence, which was not at all presented at his trial. Therefore, Matthew Hale should be swiftly released from prison, apologized to, and compensated for each month of unlawful imprisonment, essentially for his constitutionally protected political and religious views.

It is obvious that under Mr. Mueller’s administration the FBI has strayed from its mission and abused its power, failing to prevent two terrorist attacks: that of September 11, 2001, which was preventable, should the warnings of foreign intelligence agencies have been regarded, and the Boston bombing, which was likely an act of Russian-imposed Chechenian warlord kadyrov, unhappy that his human rights abuses provoke wide outrage in America, who carried out a string of assassinations of his political opponents in European and islamic nations, and which was not preventable as the FBI currently lacks the capacity to stem terrorist attacks carried out by foreign states inside the United States. The FBI record under Mr. Mueller’s administration should be investigated by an independent prosecutor, appointed by the US Congress, the report of any illegal practices and activities uncovered compiled and reported to the US Congress and the American people, and criminal charges against Mr. Mueller filed, if evidence of conspiracy with foreign states to violate the constitutionally protected rights of the Americans is uncovered. The US churches and civil associations classified by the FBI as terrorist groups because of the acts of former members over which such churches and civil associations exercise no control, should be stricken off the list of terrorist groups, and cooperation with jewish, zionist, Israeli and other civil rights organizations limited solely to alleged federal felonies. The list of federal felony crimes should be reviewed and significantly reduced by the US Congress, the so-called hate crime law repealed by the US Congress in view of unequal application of justice, since in their nature all crimes are hate crimes, and each crime of the same kind should warrant equal punishment to all criminals. FBI cooperation with foreign law enforcement agencies should be significantly reduced and limited to the criminal acts criminal in nature and recognized as crimes worldwide as intentional murder, rape, physical assault, kidnapping, slavery, piracy, etc., and there shall be no permanent FBI presence overseas besides presence mandated by specific investigation, temporary in nature, as such presence tends to lead to collaboration that often violates the constitutionally protected rights of US citizens.

It is important to precisely define what are terrorism, militancy and extremism and to delimit zones of responsibility of the CIA, the NSA and the FBI.

Terrorism is murder of civilian population for no objective reason, as the Boston bombing carried out by Tsarnaev brothers. Terrorism acts are few in number, carried out by completely wicked and deranged individuals, with whom negotiations are useless. In dealing with terrorists the proper approach is to kill them if they resist capture, or if captured and responsible for murder of two or more civilians, to swiftly judge them, sentence to death and execute them. It is important for the US Congress to consider establishing the federal crime of terrorism - murder of two or more civilian US citizens or residents for no objective reason - punished by an automatic death penalty. Terrorists, however, should not be tortured: prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment, including torture - that is, infliction of physical force or physical pain to extract confession - extends to all persons in US custody whether inside the United States of America or overseas.

Terrorist acts inside the US are the sole responsibility of the FBI, terrorist acts against US citizens overseas is the sole responsibility of the CIA. Destruction of US property, if no loss of life is involved, even if done by blasts, is not an act of terrorism. Foreign terrorists outside the United States and terrorists, who are US citizens, outside the United States, if such cannot be captured, may be killed by drone attacks, authorized by the secretary of defense in association with the director of the CIA in accordance with due process of law proper in such cases. Terrorists inside the United States should normally be arrested and tried in US civil courts, and only when their capture is impossible, or they utterly refuse to surrender can be killed by commanders of the units authorized to capture them.

Militancy/insurgency is more commonplace. A militant/insurgent is a person who has objective grievances, acceptable as such to a reasonable man, against the government of the nation the citizen of which he is, which the government of such a nation refuses to address, and raises arms in support of his cause. A militant detained by the US government overseas or inside the United States is always subject to protections of the Geneva convention relative to the protection of civilian persons in time of war. It is possible to negotiate a reasonable peace agreement with militants and often when their legitimate grievances are resolved militants eventually return to civilian life. Militants who attack US citizens inside the United States or abroad are the sole responsibility of the US department of defense that should try the militants arrested outside the United States, whether US citizens or not, in US military courts for war crimes or genocide committed by them, or detain them for the duration of hostilities not exceeding seven years, and release them thereafter if no war crimes or genocide are committed by them. Militants arrested inside the United States in times of peace should be tried in US civil courts in accordance with US law.

Foreign militants outside the United States and militants, who are US citizens, outside the United States, if such cannot be captured, may be killed by drone attacks authorized by the secretary of defense in accordance with due process of law proper in such cases. Militants inside the United States should normally be arrested and tried in US civil courts, and only when their capture is impossible or they utterly refuse to surrender can be killed by commanders of the units authorized to capture them. All militants who committed no war crimes, killed by the US military, should be buried with military honors as any other killed foreign soldiers.

A good example of a US militant, and not terrorist as many claimed, is Timothy McVeigh, who correctly perceived his actions as vengeance against the murder of the US citizens belonging to the church branch of David in Waco, TX. While the branch of David was a sect with a strange and immoral lifestyle, it did not warrant the use of the US military and the burning alive of the US citizens and their children ordered by the democratic US president clinton. Hence Timothy McVeigh was properly convicted in federal courts, sentenced to death and executed, yet he should have been shot rather than put to death by lethal injection, and buried with military honors as any other US militant, including John Brown.

A good example of foreign militant organization is Ansar-Al-Sharia, which seeks liberation of islamic nations from foreign troops and oppressive dictatorships and creation of islamic states in islamic nations.

Finally, extremism, as defined by the council of Europe as refusal to follow commonly accepted ways of life and values is not a crime, nor does it warrant any attention of the CIA, the NSA or the FBI. The United States was founded by men and women, many of whom were extremists and proud of it. Hence, the constitutional rights of extremists so defined, who are US citizens, shall be protected to the fullest extent in the United States of America by the US federal government and by the US department of state overseas, as long as no abominable deeds of sexual perversions (homosexuality, lesbianism, bestiality, incest, pedophilia (sexual relations with girls below 12 years of age)), abominations (child murders (abortions), change of gender, cannibalism, human cloning), intentional murder, enslavement of men/women or selling of men/women to slavery are committed by them. If there are conflicts over ways of life between extremists, who are US citizens, and foreign nations, foreign nations should be asked to drop civil or criminal prosecutions and expel extremists who are US citizens, or simply not let them into their territory in the first place.

In dealing with foreign extremists so defined who come to the United States because their life or freedom is put in danger due to exercising derivative-natural rights to absolute freedom of speech, freedom of peaceful assembly and association, freedom of Christian religion, freedom of conscience, the US state department should encourage the foreign state the jurisdiction of which foreign extremists flee to offer a reasonable accommodation to foreign extremists, removing danger to life and freedom to foreign extremists in retaliation of exercising derivative-natural rights to absolute freedom of speech, freedom of peaceful assembly and association, freedom of Christian religion, freedom of conscience, as long as the abominable deeds of sexual perversions (homosexuality, lesbianism, bestiality, incest, pedophilia (sexual relations with girls below 12 years of age)), abominations (child murders (abortions), change of gender, cannibalism, human cloning), intentional murder, enslavement of men/women or selling of men/women to slavery. If such a foreign state utterly refuses to offer a reasonable accommodation to foreign extremists, such foreign extremists should be granted temporary protection from deportation until a reasonable accommodation by a foreign state is granted.

In dealing with requests for cooperation of foreign states on extremist individuals and organizations so defined, especially from Russia and China, the United States of America shall automatically reject such requests, informing foreign states that extremism is not a crime in the United States, but a constitutionally protected activity, as such requests conceal political repressions against undesirable individuals, who dissent from the policies of their states and encourage dialogue between foreign states and extremist individuals and organizations so defined with a view of finding reasonable accommodation, acceptable to both parties, and respectful of derivative-natural rights to absolute freedom of speech, freedom of peaceful assembly and association, freedom of Christian religion, freedom of conscience of extremist individuals and organizations.

In dealing with extremism, it is important to remember that for the United States of America the provisions of the US constitution, including amendments to the US constitution, are superior to international law, including the UN Charter. This means that US extremist organizations so defined, even if run contrary to the goals and purposes of the UN, and engaging in voluntary self-segregation, are entitled to the fullest extent to the protection of the constitutional rights of their members who are US citizens, guaranteed by the constitution of the United States, and to the protection of the derivative-natural rights to absolute freedom of speech, freedom of peaceful assembly and association, freedom of Christian religion, freedom of conscience, the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms of US citizens and residents and the civil right of US citizens to organize, train and arm the self-defense militias of the American people, and are free to pursue their objectives and purposes even if their objectives and purposes are contrary to international law, including the UN Charter, as long as such organizations do not engage in genocide or aggressive war. Similarly the activities of foreign extremist organizations and individuals so defined shall not be interfered with by United States agents overseas. The United States of America is not in a war and will never be in a war against extremism so defined, and extremists so defined made great contributions to the economic development of the United States, developing new lifestyles and ways of life that have since become a part of the diverse American people and creating their parallel societies to gradually become American communities, even if autonomous and self-governed as the Amish. Hence the US senator Barry Goldwater is correct in his saying that extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice, and moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue, and this saying of the honorable American statesmen should properly and wisely guide the US policy in approach to extremism.

Very important is the principled US stand towards the United Nations organization: the UN is an international organization of independent and sovereign states, not a world government in the making, and not a god or gods, and the UN shall tolerate and respect the existence of individuals, organizations, peoples, nations, states and international organizations that reject its values, voluntarily refuse to participate in its activities even if such individuals, organizations, peoples, nations, states and international organizations undertake policies contrary to the goals and purposes of the United Nations, as long as such individuals, organizations, peoples, nations, states and international organizations do no engage in aggressive war or genocide. Therefore, the United States of America shall politely request so that the UN remove from its charter and international treaties all provisions inconsistent with the derivative-natural rights to absolute freedom of speech, freedom of peaceful assembly and association, freedom of Christian religion, freedom of conscience, the derivative-natural right of citizens and residents of a state to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms, and focus its policies upon its original mission of suppression of aggressive war and genocide, limitation of nuclear weapons, and worldwide prohibition and destruction of chemical and biological weapons, and shall develop and deposit with the UN appropriate reservations with regard to the UN charter and treaties, protecting the constitutionally protected rights of American citizens and residents.

Additionally, the United States of America shall adjust its stance on so-called anti-semitism: while violence against jews as any other human beings should be countered, criticism of jews shall not be silenced by means of the United States government policies. Thus, the United States shall assist jewish organizations and individuals solely in the situations where life and freedom of the jews is in danger, and shall not prevent individuals, organizations, people and states from criticizing the jews, Israel or the so-called holocaust, shall not prevent peoples or states from asking the jews to voluntarily repatriate from a particular state to Israel or a third country. Instead, the United States of America shall concentrate on promotion of the derivative-natural rights to absolute freedom of speech, freedom of peaceful assembly and association, freedom of Christian religion, freedom of conscience, the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms of citizens and residents of a state throughout the world as a realistic means to reduce armed conflicts and civil strife.

A good example of the appropriate US policy towards extremism is the bequest of Robert McCorkell towards the US civil association, the national alliance, improperly classified as a terrorist organization by the FBI, which the jewish thieves residing in Canada try to steal with the assistance of crooked lawyers. The United States of America shall exercise appropriate pressure upon the Canadian government to see the bequested estate swiftly transferred to the US civil association, the national alliance, in accordance with its unconditional duty to protect the interests of US citizens, in particular, movable physical property of US citizens that has objective intrinsic and market value abroad, even if such interests are in conflict with foreign laws prohibiting or criminalizing the conduct political or non-criminal in nature as well as to permit the remains of Mr. Robert McCorkell, who voiced many objections with regard to the policies of the Canadian government, to be transferred and buried in the United States of America, in accordance with his wishes.

Another good example of the appropriate US policy towards extremism is the story of the Romeike family from Germany, a Christian homeschooling family prosecuted by the German government for failure to enroll their children to public schools. The parental right to direct education of their children is a natural right, but even not addressing this, an important issue causing the Romeike flight was overlooked by US journalists: German government schools are unsafe where mobbing, violence and rape of German children by non-German children is tolerated by many German school administrators. It is obvious that Germany should first secure its government schools before forcing children to enroll in German government schools, and not to refuse Christian homeschooling families as the Romeike their natural right to direct the education of their children. And while Germany is entitled to conduct its internal affairs as it sees fit, and Germany is a friendly nation to the United States of America, the United States of America will not expel extremists as the Romeike family, freely choosing to live separately and peacefully from other nationals in accordance with their ways of life, values, customs and traditions, and prosecuted by their governments placing their life and freedom in danger, until their governments find reasonable accommodation, acceptable to both extremist individuals and their governments, and respectful of the derivative-natural rights to absolute freedom of speech, freedom of peaceful assembly and association, freedom of Christian religion, freedom of conscience of extremist individuals.

Finally, a good example of the appropriate US policy towards extremism is the recurring problem of the library of Russia-born rabbi Shneerson, confiscated by communist thieves after the Bolshevik revolution, of which the zionist extremist group, chabad, claims ownership. The members of chabad committed intentional murders and rapes of children of both sexes below 12 years of age, and against the members of chabad many criminal cases were opened in a number of foreign states, including those resulting in convictions and supported by objective and compelling physical evidence proving beyond reasonable doubt that the members of chabad engaged in ritual sacrifice of Christian children in satanic cabbalistic rituals involving addition of Christian blood to jewish bread, and it is difficult to imagine what can be learned out of the talmudic scripts that advise their believers to kill the best non-jews and to corrupt the best non-jewesses. Yet such talmudic scripts are physical objects that are reportedly sold in the market for thousands of US dollars. Therefore the government of the United States should request the Russian dictatorship to return the library of Russia-born rabbi Shneerson to chabad, protecting the movable physical property of US citizens that has objective market value.

It is obvious that the FBI should be thoroughly cleared of those who hold in contempt the constitutionally-protected rights of American citizens, even if worthless and repugnant ones, as long as such committed no abominable deeds of sexual perversions (homosexuality, lesbianism, bestiality, incest, pedophilia (sexual relations with girls below 12 years of age)), abominations (child murders (abortions), change of gender, cannibalism, human cloning), intentional murder, enslavement of men/women or selling of men/women to slavery.

There are significant questions whether the nominated FBI director James Comey will be able to morally and competently administer the FBI.

James Comey is known for his warrantless prosecution of successful US entrepreneur Martha Stewart on bogus charges of insider trading that were proven to be false only to have her convicted for obstruction of justice, or, more correctly, obstruction of injustice anyway: a typical overzealous prosecution against the successful American female entrepreneur disliked by many in New York.

James Comey approved of torture and ill-treatment of foreigners and US citizens: this should automatically preclude his confirmation, as the United States of America does not torture US citizens and residents, foreign citizens and stateless persons.

James Comey approved of the patriot act and its numerous violations of the constitutionally-protected rights of US citizens, advising its provisions to be made permanent. To his credit, James Comey refused to certify NSA wiretapping.

The more important issue is that there are competent and experienced candidates inside the FBI, with extensive investigative experience, able to successfully lead the FBI. One is Kevin Cornelius, a FBI agent with extensive investigative experience in the streets of various federal felony crimes, terrorism, counterintelligence, including first-hand experience with islamic terrorism and militancy, which is the best choice for the FBI director in these perilous times. Another is George Venizelos, an FBI agent who specializes in fight against drug abuse, jewish-controlled Russian organized crime and domestic terrorism. In contrast to James Comey, both have investigative experience permitting them to exercise restraint and common sense in distinguishing true terrorist threats from extremism, while Kevin Cornelius is additionally well-experienced in dealing with islamic militancy and terrorism that the unnecessary wars in Iraq and Afghanistan brought upon the United States.

The US constitution, Article 2, Section II, requires the advice and consent of the US Senate before appointing the FBI director. Therefore, the US Senate should reject the nomination of James Comey for the position of the FBI director, given that James Comey lacks moral qualities, having approved of torture and ill-treatment of persons in US custody, as well as competence, lacking investigative experience, to successfully lead the FBI, and should advise the US president the candidatures of FBI agents Kevin Cornelius and George Venizelos, competent and experienced to successfully lead the FBI in these perilous times.

Fifth, the closure of the US military torture and detention center in Guantanamo is long overdue. Osama bin Laden is dead, and the cause for the so-called war on terrorism no longer exists. Hence, the persons detained in Guantanamo should either be tried in US military courts, if they committed war crimes and genocide, otherwise released either to their nations, or if there is a credible risk of torture, to safe third countries willing to take such persons. In a year, the US military torture and detention center in Guantanamo should be closed down and never re-opened.

Sixth, fatal drone attacks shall be authorized solely outside the United States, with regard to terrorists and militants who personally committed the abominable deeds of sexual perversions (homosexuality, lesbianism, bestiality, incest, pedophilia (sexual relations with girls below 12 years of age)), abominations (child murders (abortions), change of gender, cannibalism, human cloning), intentional murder, enslavement of men/women or selling of men/women to slavery, if such cannot be captured, by the secretary of defense in association with the director of the CIA in accordance with due process of law proper in such cases. No drone attack shall be authorized with regards to Christian priests and bishops, unless such commit the abominable deeds of sexual perversions (homosexuality, lesbianism, bestiality, incest, pedophilia (sexual relations with girls below 12 years of age)), abominations (child murders (abortions), change of gender, cannibalism, human cloning), intentional murder, enslavement of men/women or selling of men/women to slavery. While executing a drone attack, reasonable care should be exercised to avoid the killing of civilians, in particular women and children below 12 years of age.

Seventh, collection of financial information by US federal agencies shall be permitted solely subject to a court order issued upon a probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and describing in particular the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized - that is, with regard to particular persons and places for federal felony investigations by the FBI or foreign intelligence purposes by the NSA.

Another danger is the newly created US consumer financial protection bureau, which, under the pretense of protection of consumer rights, collects credit card information on consumer purchases and feeds the collected information into huge mathematical and statistical databases of the US economy in order to create consumer profiles and adjust the US economic policy to promote desirable and hinder undesirable consumption patterns, economically destroying US citizens it regards as undesirable in the process. This bureau should not be permitted to collect credit card information of US customers.

Eighth, exchange of personal information with foreign states shall be restricted solely to instances of criminal conduct, non-political in nature, recognized in the past and still recognized as criminal by civilized nations, and terrorist investigations. No exchange of personal information with foreign states shall take place with regard to extremists so defined, and no exchange of personal information with regard to militants shall take place, unless a militant group is proven by objective and compelling physical evidence beyond a reasonable doubt to be carrying terrorist attacks, yet even in such circumstances no exchange of personal information with China and Russia on militants shall have place, given the risks of misuse of personal information to target political dissenters.

It is important to restrict US defense and security cooperation with China and Russia to issues related to control and non-proliferation of nuclear, chemical and biological weapons of mass destruction, criminal conduct, non-political in nature, recognized in the past and still recognized as criminal by civilized nations, and terrorist investigations, and exercise care with regard to such US defense and security cooperation with China and Russia, given completely different approaches to security taken by China and Russia.

China is indeed a great and independent ancient nation, yet it views its citizens as servants or slaves of the Chinese state and assembles large databases of personal information to re-assign them wherever the Chinese state wishes. This approach to security may be appropriate for Chinese nation in accordance with the customs and traditions of Chinese statecraft, but is completely inappropriate to the United States, a free nation of free men and women that expects US citizens to be free and just judges of law and equity, able to objectively define Good and evil for themselves and those voluntarily subjecting themselves to the their authority by thorough study of the commandments of Lord God Jehovah and Lord Jesus Christ, customs and traditions of American statecraft, natural rights, derivative-natural rights, civil rights and traditional rights of American citizens and residents.

As for Russia, it is presently the last European colonial empire, ruled by the Russian dictatorship, and hostile to the US national interests:

- that still prevents the islamic nations of Chechnya, Ingushetia, Dagestan, Karachay-Cherkessia, Kabardino-Balkaria, Adygea, Tatarstan, Bashkortostan, Kalmykia, Northern Ossetia and Mongolian nations of Tuva and Buryatia from obtaining freedom, sovereignty and independence, waging a brutal colonial war in the territory of those nations, and provoking terrorism that reached US shores with the Boston bombing;
- that seeks restoration of the soviet union through so-called eurasian union by meddling in the internal affairs of Central Asian nations, supports the brutal Tajik and Uzbek dictatorships, and seeks to entrench its military presence in Central Asia through the collective security treaty organization;
- that so far refuses to return the historically non-Russian lands of the Kurili islands to Japan; Karelia, the territories of Finland that were a part of Finland according to the treaty of Tartu 1920 to Finland; the territories of Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia that were a part of Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia according to the treaty of Tartu 1920 to Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia; the so-called kaliningrad (Koennigsberg) region to Poland.
- that sends weapons and volunteers to Syria to support the bloody assad dictatorship;
- that refuses to conduct free elections or respect natural rights, derivative-natural rights, civil rights and traditional rights of Russian citizens and residents, in particular, derivative-natural rights to absolute freedom of speech, freedom of peaceful assembly, freedom of Christian religion, freedom of conscience;
- that widely practices slavery and sexual slavery, including slavery of children of both sexes, terrorist attacks in foreign nations;

therefore, Russia is a hostile nation and the main geopolitical enemy of the United States of America. It is of course possible that Russia will cease to be a colonial empire:

- will dissolve the eurasian union and collective security treaty organization and will end its meddling into internal affairs of islamic nations and sending of weapons and volunteers to islamic nations;
- will grant freedom, sovereignty and independence to the islamic nations of Chechnya, Ingushetia, Dagestan, Karachay-Cherkessia, Kabardino-Balkaria, Adygea, Tatarstan, Bashkortostan, Kalmykia, Northern Ossetia and Mongolian nations of Tuva and Buryatia;
- will return the historically non-Russian lands of the Kurili islands to Japan; Karelia, the territories of Finland that were a part of Finland according to the treaty of Tartu 1920 to Finland; the territories of Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia that were a part of Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia according to the treaty of Tartu 1920 to Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia; the so-called kaliningrad (Koennigsberg) region to Poland;
- will conduct free elections and fully respect natural rights, derivative-natural rights, civil rights and traditional rights of Russian citizens and residents, in particular, derivative-natural rights to absolute freedom of speech, freedom of peaceful assembly, freedom of Christian religion, freedom of conscience;
- will cease practicing slavery and sexual slavery, including slavery of children of both sexes and terrorist attacks in foreign nations, release all slaves, and punish those guilty of practicing slavery and sexual slavery and carrying out terrorist attacks in foreign nations;

ceasing to be a threat to US interests, and becoming a nation-state of the Russian people and the great regional power it has always been, compensating for the above-mentioned territorial transfers with 1/3 of the Arctic it is entitled to. At present, however, Russia as any other colonial empire, seeks wars and subjugation of foreign nations, again becoming a threat to the world peace, and the US shall act accordingly with regard to Russia. If necessary, a US law shall be drafted and passed by the US Congress, restricting defense and security cooperation with China and Russia to issues related to control and non-proliferation of nuclear, chemical and biological weapons of mass destruction, criminal conduct, non-political in nature, recognized in the past and still recognized as criminal by civilized nations, and terrorist investigations

Ninth, so-called cyber threats and new threats shall be ignored by the NSA, the CIA and the FBI. These non-existent so-called cyber threats, invented by parasitic bureaucrats to justify their existence, can be addressed by the private sector, reasonable IT security measures and state civil laws. Nor is the so-called theft of US intellectual property important: in fact, US patent service was too liberal in approving patents, and US patenting protection shall be limited to inventions of physical objects or physical devices that can be realized in an industrial model, for the term of seven years, renewable for another seven years. Similarly, US copyright protection should be limited to trade marks and shall not in any wise be granted to obscene images and recordings, depicting sexual intercourse with joined sexual organs of men and women. The US Foreign Service should concentrate on protection of rights of inventors of physical objects or physical devices that can be realized in an industrial model for the term of no more than 14 years from the patenting date and corporate trade marks: all other copyright and patenting protection shall be advanced by trade associations.
fdtwain is offline  
Old April 16th, 2016, 08:02 PM   #2
Banned
 
fdtwain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Europe
Posts: 618
Tenth, the US foreign intelligence court should take great care not to become star chambers, and to approve solely such surveillance as warranted by a probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and describing in particular the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized - that is, with regard to particular persons and places for federal felony investigations by the FBI or foreign intelligence purposes by the NSA.

Furthermore, the US foreign intelligence court shall compile an annual report to the US congressional intelligence committee, describing its activities for the year. Next the provision of the NDAA permitting indefinite detention of the US citizens should be repealed. US citizens inside the United States are subject to the jurisdiction of federal courts, while US citizens overseas, if detained, should be transferred to the jurisdiction of US federal courts or US military courts within 13 months after detention.

Yet the main cause of the present insecurity in America is a false approach to the issue, replacing freedom, economic growth and safety, attainable for (wo)men, with peace, stability and security, unattainable for (wo)men. Hence restoration of freedom, economic growth and safety should begin with abolishment of the department of homeland security that has no constitutional place in the US government. Otherwise, the Americans will learn the hard way that those who give up freedom for security deserve neither and achieve none.
fdtwain is offline  
Old April 16th, 2016, 08:26 PM   #3
Banned
 
fdtwain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Europe
Posts: 618
The dangers of forced DNA testing

The US supreme court in its opinion has permitted US law enforcement agencies to take DNA samples from US citizens and residents charged with serious crimes. It is important for the US federal government and US state governments to exercise great care in DNA sampling to avoid many dangers associated with the practice, of which the dissenting opinion of justice Antonin Scalia warns. It is important for the US supreme court to return to forced taking of DNA samples in later cases to clarify the ruling and to develop the realistic legal standard to guide US law enforcement agencies with regard to this issue.

First, there is no question that it is lawful for a US law enforcement agency to take a DNA sample from a US citizen or resident charged by a grand jury with a felony offense to gather evidence that may swiftly exonerate or convict him or her of an allegedly committed felony. Such search is clearly reasonable within the meaning of the 4th amendment to the US constitution and may be carried out with a written court warrant supported by the objective and compelling evidence sufficient to accuse the (wo)man whose DNA is taken of felony.

Second, there is no question that it is unlawful for a US law enforcement agency to take a DNA sample from a US citizen or resident charged with a misdemeanor offense or a civil infraction: such offences can be investigated without gathering DNA evidence, and permission to collect DNA samples with regard with misdemeanor offenses or civil infractions will lead to giant databases containing DNA records of US citizens and residents and fishing expeditions of US law enforcement agencies, prohibited in the 4th amendment to the US constitution.

Third, there are situations in which US citizens and residents are charged by a grand jury with a felony offense, yet DNA sample taken from those US citizens and residents link those US citizens and residents with other felonies committed in the territory of the United States. In this situation, it is lawful for US law enforcement agencies to use DNA sample taken in one felony investigation to cross-check DNA samples taken in other felony investigations with regard to felonies committed within the United States. Felony crimes are serious crimes, and while all US citizens and residents are presumed innocent until proven guilty, the requirement that DNA sample be taken with a written court warrant, supported by the objective and compelling evidence sufficient to accuse (wo)man of felony, establishes such DNA search as reasonable, as, regretfully, according to the statistical evidence collected, the rate of recidivism is high among felons, and DNA search is generally necessary to be carried out within felony cases to swiftly exonerate or convict a suspect of an allegedly committed felony that may result in prolonged imprisonment or even a death penalty for those charged, innocent of the charges, or permit felons at large to continue engage in felony crimes grossly endangering public safety within the United States.

Fourth, strict procedural requirements should be established by the US supreme court with regard to DNA searches conducted and DNA samples taken, because of many dangers associated with DNA searches: to prevent creation of databases of records of US citizens and residents classified by their DNA profiles, fishing expeditions of US law enforcement agencies and planting of DNA evidence by US law enforcement agencies to dissenting US citizens and residents. First, no DNA search within the United States can be conducted without a written court warrant supported by objective and compelling evidence sufficient to accuse (wo)man of felony, and all evidence gathered by US law enforcement agencies with warrantless DNA searches shall be inadmissible in US courts. Second, if a US citizen or a resident is exonerated by the results of DNA search or acquitted by the US courts, DNA samples collected from him or her shall be destroyed within 72 hours after exoneration or acquittal. Third, DNA samples shall never be used for identification purposes of living US citizens and residents, for which fingerprints are sufficient in hard cases. Within the United States, a US citizen and US resident is judged solely of his/her deeds: not by his/her background, not by his/her class or estate, not by his/her words. The US Founding Fathers rejected the European way of judging a man by his class or estate, the Chinese way of judging a man by his lineage, and the Catholic way of judging a man by his words, making the United States of America the greatest nation in history of mankind, and it should remain so. Fourth, DNA evidence shall be inadmissible in US courts with regard to misdemeanor crimes and civil infractions, and DNA searches prohibited by federal and state law with regard to misdemeanor crimes and civil infractions, given that misdemeanor crimes and civil infractions can be adequately investigated without DNA evidence. The use of routine DNA searches with regard to misdemeanor crimes and civil infractions will lead to giant databases containing DNA records of US citizens and residents and fishing expeditions of US law enforcement agencies, prohibited in the 4th amendment to the US constitution, the DNA evidence gathered may be planted by US law enforcement agencies to charge dissenting US citizens and residents with crimes they did not commit, or even misused by powerful and well-connected economic, social and ethnic elites within the US government in order to destroy those US citizens and residents deemed politically, religiously, socially or ethnically hostile to their agendas.

To sum up:

- use of DNA searches in felony cases with a written court warrant, supported by objective and compelling evidence sufficient to accuse the (wo)man whose DNA is taken of a felony constitutes a reasonable search under the 4th amendment to the US constitution, provided that if a US citizen or resident is exonerated by the results of DNA search or acquitted by US courts, DNA samples collected from him or her are destroyed within 72 hours after exoneration or acquittal;
- use of DNA searches in misdemeanor and civil infraction cases constitutes an unreasonable search under the 4th amendment to the US constitution;
- use of DNA searches for identification purposes of living US citizens and residents constitutes an unreasonable search under the 4th amendment to the US constitution.

It is important for the US supreme court to return to forced taking of DNA samples in later cases to clarify the ruling and develop a realistic legal standard to guide US law enforcement agencies with regard to this issue.

Another dangerous trend with the US courts is proliferation of cruel and unusual punishments prohibited by the 8th amendment to the US constitution. One legal case is the case of a small Amish Christian church, the members of which, including the Christian bishop leading the group, were given lengthy prison sentences exceeding 10 years for essentially a civil infraction: cutting hair and beards of other Amish Christians because of a religious dispute - a punishment that amounted to cruel and unusual punishment prohibited by the 8th amendment to the US constitution.

This case is interesting because it goes against the foundational traditions of US jurisprudence, including equality before law, and because of sheer arrogance and anti-Christian bias demonstrated by the US justice department and the jewish judge presiding over the case. First, the very notion of the so-called hate crime violates equality before law, punishing one and the same criminal act differently because of thoughts and words of suspects: all crimes are in their nature hate crimes. Second, the use of the federal law in this case is supported by the ridiculous assumption that the scissors used to cut hair of the alleged victims crossed state lines, which is clearly insufficient to apply a federal law to what is in its nature a state crime, committed within one state by the residents of the same state against the residents of the same state. Third, the USA acknowledges God, Lord God Jehovah, Lord Jesus Christ, Holy Spirit, and God, Lord God Jehovah, Lord Jesus Christ, Holy Spirit, therefore Christian priests and bishops can be judged by the US federal government solely if they committed the abominable deeds of sexual perversions (homosexuality, lesbianism, bestiality, incest, pedophilia (sexual relations with girls below 12 years of age)), abominations (child murders (abortions), change of gender, cannibalism, human cloning), intentional murder, enslavement of men/women or selling of men/women to slavery: in all other matters Christian priests and bishops give account to Lord Jesus Christ of their deeds and words. Yet in this case, the Christian bishop who did not even participate in the cuttings, has been given a lengthy prison sentence exceeding ten years for what is a state crime, either a civil infraction or a misdemeanor, by a clearly biased anti-Christian prosecutor and jewish judge, who even referred to his background, trying to justify the sentence. It is clearly obvious that justice and equity requires that an individual who committed a civil infraction or a misdemeanor under whatsoever motive that did not result in loss of life, physical disability, rape or gross destruction of property in advance of 14700 ounces of silver cannot be sentenced for more than seven years for his crime, even if his crime is classified as a felony offense: a longer sentence in such circumstances will be clearly a cruel and unusual punishment, prohibited by the 8th amendment to the US constitution.

The Amish church appealed the cruel and unusual punishment imposed upon them to higher US federal courts that hopefully will throw out the case against the Amish church altogether as clearly not under the jurisdiction of US federal laws and imposing a cruel and unusual punishment a civil infraction or a misdemeanor governed by state laws, prohibited by the 8th amendment to the US constitution, which will be another victory for the courageous lawyers of the center for individual rights who stand for the traditions of American jurisprudence.

There are also improper and unwise attempts to extend the reach of US laws beyond US territory towards citizens of foreign nations who are reportedly arrested in third countries and subsequently extradited to the United States to stand trial under US laws for the acts that are not considered crimes in the nations or third countries in which they reside, which is clearly a violation of justice and equity. A well-known case of Russian citizen Victor Bout is one example of such overreach.

Mr. Bout is a Russian citizen, officer of the soviet and Russian army, and a dealer in Russian weapons, well connected with the Russian organized crime and officials of the Russian dictatorship, who passionately hates the United States of America, American values and US policies with regard to foreign nations. He was arrested in Thailand, and subsequently extradited to the United States to stand trial under US laws, which are not applicable to Mr. Bout, as Mr. Bout never sought to become a citizen or a resident of the United States or enter the territory of the United States. Instead, Mr. Bout, judging by his statements, views himself and the network of his fellow arms dealers to be in war with the United States of America in retaliation of the hostile acts of the United States of America taken against the soviet union, Mr. Bout’s dissolved homeland, and as such should be treated as a prisoner of war in accordance with all provisions of the Geneva convention relative to the treatment of prisoners of war. And it is hard to question the claim of the Russian dictatorship that Mr. Bout was subjected to the politically motivated sentence of 25-year imprisonment, being neither a citizen, nor a resident, nor a visitor of the United States, but a citizen of a foreign state, who completely rejected laws and values of the United States and fought against US interests abroad, and therefore not subject to US laws.

Similarly, a number of foreign citizens were arrested in third countries and extradited to the US to stand trial for various civil infractions related to unauthorized access to US computer systems and unauthorized changes of banking and credit card records, which are subject to civil law. It is clearly obvious that foreign citizens who are neither citizens, nor residents, nor visitors of the United States, but citizens of foreign states, who completely rejected laws and values of the United States and acted against US interests abroad, are not subject to US laws, and therefore lengthy prison sentences in excess of seven-year imprisonment against such foreign citizens for breaking US laws by acts committed in third countries, given that such foreign citizens have not freely consented to live under US laws, constitute cruel and unusual punishment prohibited under the 8th amendment to the US constitution.

A well-known case is the unlawful and groundless US extradition request of Mr. Kim Dotcom, a citizen of Germany, who took residence in New Zealand. Mr. Dotcom is prosecuted by overzealous US investigators simply because he developed a website called Megaupload, permitting individuals to share books, movies and songs, and profited from internet advertisements, rejecting the unlawful and groundless expansion of US Copyright laws beyond its original proper application to trademarks and inventions of physical devices, realizable in industrial models, honoring the derivative-natural rights to absolute freedom of speech, freedom of peaceful assembly and association, freedom of conscience. Hopefully, the unlawful and groundless US extradition request will be either discontinued by reasonable US attorneys or rejected by New Zealand, ending witch hunt against Mr. Dotcom.

It is clear that US laws apply solely to US citizens, residents and visitors of the territory of the United States, including foreign citizens who lawfully or unlawfully enter the territory of the United States. It is also clear that US laws do not apply and cannot apply to foreign citizens who reside in the territory of their nations or in third countries, being subject to the laws of their nations or third countries, or, in some instances, not subject to human laws as long as such individuals do not commit the abominable deeds of sexual perversions (homosexuality, lesbianism, bestiality, incest, pedophilia (sexual relations with girls below 12 years of age)), abominations (child murders (abortions), change of gender, cannibalism, human cloning), intentional murder, enslavement of men/women or selling of men/women to slavery. Therefore, if foreign citizens commit hostile acts against the United States, citizens, residents and legal entities of the United States, in their nations or in third countries, the United States shall seek redress under the laws of their nations or third countries, and shall not seek their extradition to the United States, improperly and unwisely claiming universal applicability of US laws, or acknowledging universal applicability of laws of any foreign nation or international organization.

In fact, there cannot be a universal law code suitable for all men and women: even the statutes and commandments of God, Lord God Jehovah, Lord Jesus Christ, Holy Spirit, while perfectly just and equitable, are rejected by 2/3 of men and women, and there will always be acts that are regarded as crimes in one state, but not prosecuted or lauded as heroic acts in another state. Human history records countless examples of empires who sought to build one city, one tower and one legal code for all the nations and peoples, beginning with the Babylonian empire and ending with the western and eastern Roman empires, that brought aggressive wars, genocide, oppression, dispossession, enslavement, destruction and desolation to other nations and peoples, before their defeat and destruction by the coalition of oppressed, dispossessed and enslaved peoples that rose up in defense of their freedom and self-determination.

Instead, foreigners who commit hostile acts against the United States in their nations or third countries should be prosecuted by the United States under the laws of their nations or third countries, or permitted to engage in such hostile acts, respecting their natural right to pursuit of happiness as long as such foreigners do not commit the abominable deeds of sexual perversions (homosexuality, lesbianism, bestiality, incest, pedophilia (sexual relations with girls below 12 years of age)), abominations (child murders (abortions), change of gender, cannibalism, human cloning), intentional murder, enslavement of men/women or selling of men/women to slavery, in which cases drone strikes may be carried by the United States against such individuals, if courts in their nations or third countries cannot or will not prosecute them. Similarly, foreigners who engage in genocide or aggressive war in the territory of foreign nations can be prosecuted in the national courts of those nations, international courts, or drone strikes may be carried by the United States against such individuals, if their national or international courts cannot or will not prosecute them.

With regard to other foreigners, who commit hostile acts against the United States in their nations or third countries, yet do not engage in the abominable deeds of sexual perversions (homosexuality, lesbianism, bestiality, incest, pedophilia (sexual relations with girls below 12 years of age)), abominations (child murders (abortions), change of gender, cannibalism, human cloning), intentional murder, enslavement of men/women or selling of men/women to slavery, aggressive war or genocide, such foreigners, if cannot be prosecuted by the United States under the laws of their nations or third countries, shall be tolerated by the United States in accordance with the provisions of the covenant of Noah, and the United States shall respect the rights of such individuals, even if hostile to the United States, to live their lives as they see fit. In fact, in present world there are billions of men and women, hostile to the United States, including the whole nations as Iran, that falsely regard the United States as a rogue or even a satanic nation, and such men, women, organizations and nations are entitled to live in ignorance in their separate and equal station, if they desire to learn by their own deeds that they are wrong in their hostility to the United States of America. In fact, the US is an exceptional nation precisely because it does not seek to impose its laws, customs and traditions by force upon other states, nations and people. Instead, US foreign policy can counter such hostile acts, by promotion of political and economic freedom and promotion of protection of individual natural rights and derivative-natural rights throughout the world: free nations and peoples tend to have law codes that are close to one another, while respecting important differences arising from indigenous religious traditions of interpretations of the commandments of Lord God Jehovah and Lord Jesus Christ, customs and traditions of state-forming people(s), natural rights, derivative-natural rights, civil rights and traditional rights of citizens and residents of a state-forming people.

This signifies, in particular, that Mr. Bout should be treated no harsher than other prisoners in accordance with all provisions of the Geneva convention relative to the treatment of prisoners of war, and once his prison sentence is served, should be permitted a swift and safe return to Russia not to unduly prolong his stay in the territory of the United States of America that Mr. Bout hates so much. This also signifies that the United States should seek settlements with various foreigners who were extradited to the United States on so-called cyber crime charges to recover the stolen funds that can be recovered and subsequently permitting such foreigners a return to their nations or third countries to stand trial under their national laws, if there are applicable laws in force, rather than to impose prison sentences upon them.

Finally, the US supreme court should rein in the foreign intelligence court, clearly pronouncing in its decisions that the 4th amendment to the US constitution prohibits surveillance of electronic communications of US citizens and residents, without a court order issued upon a probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized - that is, with regard to particular persons and places for federal felony investigations by the FBI or foreign intelligence purposes by the NSA. This subject needs to be urgently addressed by the US supreme court, given the information with regard to the scope of unconstitutional surveillance of electronic communications of US citizens revealed by Mr Snowden.
fdtwain is offline  
Old April 16th, 2016, 08:27 PM   #4
Banned
 
fdtwain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Europe
Posts: 618
Standing against UN arms trade treaty

The obama administration signed the so-called UN arms trade treaty (ATT) that violates the 2nd amendment to the US constitution and is therefore without legal effect within the territory of the United States. The US Senate shall not ratify UN arms trade treaty and next US republican president shall denounce the UN arms trade treaty that clearly violates the US constitution and US national sovereignty.

The ATT significantly exceeds UN authority, unlawfully and groundlessly interferes with the inalienable right to self-determination of peoples and national sovereignty as well as the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and keep and bear arms of citizens and residents of a state. Surprisingly, only Iran, Syria and North Korea properly and wisely voted against the ATT, while Russia, China, India, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Oman and nearly two dozen other states properly and wisely abstained. The arms trade treaty does not contribute positively to promotion and maintaining of peace between nations and individuals, but, as the history of similarly worded agreements compellingly demonstrates, paves the way to civil war and genocide.

The preamble of the ATT acknowledges the United Nations as a source of principles upon which the agreement is based, unlawfully permitting the United Nations the power to authorize “end users” and “end use” of conventional arms. In fact, the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms, derivative from the natural right to liberty, comes from God and is given by God to a man. Specifically, Lord God Jehovah commanded a great sword to be given to the sheep (Book of Enoch, Section XVII, Chapter 90). Furthermore, Lord Jesus Christ commanded Christians to sell a garment and buy a sword (Luke 22:36). In fact the disciples of Lord Jesus Christ had two swords, the assault weapons of those days, the ownership of which was prohibited to non-citizens of the Roman empire (Luke 22:3. Thus, Lord Jesus Christ specifically ordered Christians to disregard human laws if such human laws contradict the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms. God through prophet Mohammed ordered each muslim to own a personal weapon and to carry out the holy war against those who do not acknowledge God, those who commit the abominable deeds of sexual perversions (homosexuality, lesbianism, bestiality, incest, pedophilia (sexual relations with girls below 12 years of age)), abominations (child murders (abortions), change of gender, cannibalism, human cloning), intentional murder, enslavement of men/women or selling of men/women to slavery, and those who engage in aggressive war and genocide against islamic nations. Each muslim is expected to resist and wage the holy war against the Antichrist (Dajjal), his servants and slaves until the Day of Judgment.

Furthermore, the preamble of the ATT acknowledges the non-existent right of sovereign states to regulate and control conventional arms, when the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms, coming from God, and not from a people or a state, specifically prohibits a people or a state to limit or abridge the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms, instructing the worshipers of God to disregard any civil law limiting or abridging the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms. Additionally, the constitutions of sovereign states, specifically the US constitution, prohibit the state from limiting or abridging the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms. Finally, the traditions and customs of the nations of men, reflective of the commandments of God, acknowledged the customary right of citizens and free men to be armed. Hence, contrary to the false claim of the ATT there exists no right of a sovereign state to regulate and control personal weapons. Thus, the preamble of the ATT unlawfully interferes with the commandments of both Christian and islamic religion, and is therefore without legal effect as contrary to the clear commandments of Lord God Jehovah and Lord Jesus Christ, furthermore contradicting the commandments of islamic faith and sharia law, constitutions of sovereign nations, and customs and traditions of the nations of men.

The scope of the ATT unlawfully interferes with the inalienable right to self-determination of peoples and national sovereignty, since ownership of battle tanks, military aircrafts, military helicopters, warships is reserved to peoples, and ownership of light armored vehicles and stationary artillery systems is reserved to peoples and self-defense militias of citizens, being part of self-determining peoples, and these are exclusively self-determining peoples and the states such self-determining peoples establish that define the rules pertaining to trade in the above-mentioned arms. Furthermore, the scope of the ATT unlawfully interferes with the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and keep and bear arms of citizens and residents of the state, permitting to own military knives, handguns, automatic rifles, machine guns, grenades, portable grenade launchers, portable missile launchers, portable anti-aircraft missiles, portable anti-tank missiles, portable naval missiles, and appropriate munitions. And while some may consider the scope of the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and keep and bear arms extensive, there is a historical record of the last two centuries when tanks, helicopters and aircrafts were sent by the states against previously disarmed civilians to massacre hundreds of thousands or even millions of civilians. In contrast, in the nations wherein the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms is protected and people are armed with the above-mentioned personal arms to be able to effectively protect themselves, there were no such massacres recorded. Therefore, the scope of the ATT unlawfully interferes with the inalienable right to self-determination of peoples, national sovereignty and the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms, and is without legal effect.

Article 5 of the ATT orders states to establish national control systems, including the national control list - that is, a database of those who owns, buys, sells, trades, or transfers any of the weapons included in the list provided above as well as the ammunition, parts, and components of those weapons, which, furthermore, should be provided to the secretariat of the United Nations to be made available to other states and to be kept at least 10 years. It is clearly obvious that article 5 of the ATT violates numerous constitutions of sovereign nations, specifically constitutes an unreasonable search prohibited under the fourth amendment to the US constitution, and violates the requirements of national defense being part of the inalienable right to self-determination of peoples and national sovereignty. Additionally, as it is well known, gun registration is gun confiscation, and without gun registration gun confiscation is impossible to be achieved. Hence, article 5 of the ATT is contrary to the inalienable right to self-determination of peoples and national sovereignty as well as protection against unreasonable searches and seizures in numerous constitutions of the sovereign nations, and is without legal effect.

Article 16 of the ATT specifically permits the UN to interfere in the internal affairs of sovereign nations including help with the enforcement of stockpile management, disarmament, demobilization and reintegration programs, which may well be used as a cover for invasion of the territory of a sovereign nation the gun laws of which are not to the liking of the UN.

The arms trade treaty does not recognize the inherent right of a people against which genocide is committed to receive weapons to defend their life, liberty from enslavement, dignity from rape and physical assault and movable property if such a people wishes so, which is a well established principle of international law recognized by many nations, including Persian kings, and a part of the inalienable right to self-determination of peoples. It imposes an obligation to consider if the transfer of arms facilitates terrorism or transnational organized crime: hence given that regimes that commit genocide ordinarily call their victims terrorists and criminals, the ATT unlawfully and groundlessly interferes with the right of a people against which genocide is committed to receive weapons to defend their life, liberty from enslavement, dignity from rape and physical assault and movable property, if such a people wishes so, being a part of the inalienable right to self-determination of peoples. Hence, the ATT does not contribute to promotion and maintenance of peace as its proponents claim, but in fact provokes civil war, so it is proper and lawful for the manufacturers and owners of personal weapons not to comply with the provisions of the ATT provoking an unnecessary and avoidable conflict between a state and the citizens of a state who manufacture, own and transfer personal arms by requiring gun registration, which is in fact gun confiscation, and paves the way for genocide of unpopular minorities and popular majorities by oppressive governments by unlawfully, groundlessly and onerously burdening the transfer of personal weapons in such circumstances.

Therefore, the ATT unlawfully and groundlessly interferes with the inalienable right to self-determination of peoples and national sovereignty, as well as the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and keep and bear arms of citizens and residents of a state, and is therefore without legal effect as contrary to the clear commandments of Lord God Jehovah and Lord Jesus Christ, furthermore contradicting the commandments of islamic faith and sharia law, constitutions of sovereign nations, and customs and traditions of nations of men. The passage of the ATT is in itself a gross infringement of the United Nations upon the authority of sovereign states and individual rights, and the continuation of the downfall of the United Nations, which increasingly proves to be a failed globalist and humanist project, attempting to define and enforce the non-existent global standards in the world of nation states and regional international organizations with different religions, cultures, values, customs and traditions, and ultimately civilizations that are often in conflict with each other to such a degree that very few foundational principles can be successfully defined and enforced. Hence the world of the 21st century will ultimately be the world without the United Nations replaced by regional international organizations of the nations belonging to the same civilizations.

There is no question that the transfer of non-personal conventional weapons, specifically battle tanks, military aircrafts, military helicopters and warships to dictatorships contributes to international conflicts and brings significant damage to civilians. To this cause UN security council sanctions are available: and it is not the deficiency of the sanctions mechanism, but rather the unwillingness of some members of the UN security council to approve appropriate sanctions in clear cases of genocide and grave mass violations of human rights that hampers the effectiveness of UN sanctions against dictatorial regimes. This mechanism can further be strengthened by regional treaties approved by consensus of their participants, limiting the numbers of battle tanks, military aircrafts, military helicopters and warships to prevent arms race and establishing clear well-defined and properly interpreted criteria for the transfer of battle tanks, military aircrafts, military helicopters and warships to third nations to prevent their transfer to dictatorships. The treaty on conventional armed forces in Europe, prepared and ratified by the OSCE members, is a good example of such a treaty. Trade in personal weapons, however, shall not be regulated, given its essential importance for preservation of freedom and individual rights and prevention of genocide and grave mass violations of human rights. As for the UN, it shall concentrate on its original mandate wherein it has jurisdiction: limitation of nuclear weapons, and prohibition and destruction of chemical and biological weapons of mass destruction throughout the world, leaving conventional arms to jurisdiction of the regional organizations of states, peoples and individuals wherein it pertains.

Regrettably, a historical record is ripe with the terrible consequences of civilian disarmament and failure to provide personal weapons to unpopular minorities and populations of dictatorial regimes, against whom genocide is committed, containing a long list of hundreds of millions of victims. Even UN peacekeepers proved to be unable to prevent genocide and grave mass violations of human rights, as it happened in former Jugoslavian and African nations. It is good and proper for the nations of the world to remember Carthage, which the Romans after the inspection of Carthage first asked to discontinue production of conventional weapons of that day, subsequently asked to give away the stocks of the most of conventional weapons and then came to massacre all Carthaginians and burned the city of Carthage to the ground, and to reject the arms trade treaty in its entirety, disregarding the siren voices of advocates of civilian disarmament, which seek to use the ATT as its Trojan horse.

Therefore, the US Senate shall not ratify the UN arms trade treaty. Furthermore, the US federal government, US state governments and district governments, citizens and residents of the United States of America shall not comply with the provisions of the UN arms trade treaty, bearing neither legal nor moral responsibility, since the UN arms trade treaty is without legal effect as contrary to the clear commandments of Lord God Jehovah and Lord Jesus Christ, furthermore contradicting the inalienable right to self-determination of the American people and US national sovereignty, the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and keep and bear arms of citizens and residents of the United States of America, the 2nd amendment to the US constitution, provisions of the constitutions of US states, and customs and traditions of the American people. The US federal government, US state and district governments as well as US federal, state, district and international courts shall not regard the arms trade treaty as customary international law. Those who support the arms trade treaty should understand that they as the Carthaginians of old are paving the way to civil war, foreign aggression, and genocide or enslavement of unpopular minorities or majorities by economic, social and ethnic elites, bringing with the ATT death and destruction instead of peace and security claimed.

Specifically, US courts shall not regard the UN arms trade treaty as customary international law and shall repeal any executive order based on provisions the UN arms trade treaty as contrary to the constitution of the United States. US states, districts and citizens shall not comply with the provisions of the UN arms trade treaty, shall not comply with the provisions of any executive order based on provisions of the UN arms trade treaty as contrary to the constitution of the United States. Finally, US citizens should purchase at least one and still better two machine guns with 12000 rounds of ammunition per each male member of their families, at least one and still better two handguns with 1200 rounds of ammunition per each female member of their families, and two military knives per each family member.

Those men and women of good will who are sincerely interested in promotion of disarmament within the UN should concentrate first and foremost on limiting nuclear weapons, and prohibition and destruction of chemical and biological weapons of mass destruction throughout the world. Whereas US and Russian nuclear arsenals are reduced to reasonable numbers adequate for the purposes of national defense, it is important to concentrate on the nuclear states of China, the UK, France, India, Pakistan to meet their present commitment towards declaring and limiting their nuclear arsenals as well as to respect the right of the great regional powers of Turkey, Iran, Japan, Germany to develop and possess a limited number of nuclear weapons to secure their sovereignty if these nations wish so. It is important to encourage North Korea to reunite with South Korea, making the united Korea a nuclear state with a limited number of nuclear weapons, given many instances of foreign aggression against the Korean nation, or, if the united Korea wishes so, it can decommission its nuclear arsenal and become a non-nuclear state. It is also important to pass a UN resolution to call upon the state of Israel to declare its nuclear arsenal, subject it to international inspections and take the obligation to limit its nuclear arsenal, while acknowledging the state of Israel as a nuclear state. Finally, a treaty establishing a comprehensive global ban on chemical and biological weapons of mass destruction should be developed, ratified and implemented, given that these weapons are no longer effective in modern warfare, suitable mainly for the unlawful use against civilian population, and especially prone to acquisition and use by terrorists.
Importantly, what the nations of men need to promote and maintain peace is not civilian disarmament but affirmation of the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms and the civil right to organize, train and arm self-defense militias of the people, to give citizens protection against crime and to establish volunteer or low-cost civil associations that proved numerous times their effectiveness in provision of territorial defense, fighting misdemeanor crime and illegal migration to be gradually integrated in the national guard in these times of rising crime, budget deficits, and inevitable reductions in military and police budgets, permitting gradual dissolution of standing armies and concentration of the police upon felony crimes. These civilian associations also proved to be a formidable obstacle to dictatorships of various sorts and infringements upon authority of provincial and district governments, rights of citizens and residents of the states, as the rebellion of Italian carabineri against the fascist Mussolini regime so well demonstrated. In fact more personal weapons equals less crime, and many other positive good effects as US classical researcher John Lott so clearly demonstrated in his thorough study “More Guns, Less Crime”. Regrettably, the adoption of the ATT by the UN points to grave dangers ahead: global economic, social and ethnic elites have chosen war and genocide which they will get and in which they will not prevail, shedding rivers of blood in the process.

Some public officials of the obama administration are unhappy that the Americans still have their weapons, and barrack hussein obama declared that he would put all his weight towards the introduction of so-called gun control laws in the United States of America, seeking to unlawfully interfere with the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and keep and bear arms given by God. Interestingly, barrack hussein obama acknowledged that the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms was given by God, yet falsely stated that this right given by God somehow conflicted with other derivative-natural rights, in particular, the natural right to life. This is of course a blatant lie: guns do not kill people, but criminals do, and, as American classical scholar Lott demonstrated, more guns leads to less crime. A good example supporting these findings is the recent Naval Yard shootout in Washington, DC: a negro contractor killed more than dozen US Navy personnel because US Navy personnel in the Naval Yard reportedly were left unarmed, unable to resist intruders.

In fact, the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms is established precisely to defend the natural right to life of US citizens from criminals as well as from a tyrannical US federal government, or, more generally, established by Lord God Jehovah, Lord Jesus Christ, Holy Spirit to protect the life of righteous men from wicked men and wicked tyrannical governments. Regrettably, the history of men, in particular, that of the 20th century, is full of examples of democratic genocide, i.e., genocide of disarmed and often righteous men and women by totalitarian states and other tyrannies, often either elected by the majority of the people or approved by the majority of the people through active or tacit compliance with its genocidal policies. And the US government is no exception, as the recent events in Waco, TX have demonstrated so well.

Regretfully, barack hussein obama demonstrated his contempt towards the American system and the American way once again, claiming that the 2nd Amendment is somehow obsolete, when in fact it is not at all obsolete. The derivative-natural rights, recognized and protected in the first ten amendments to the US constitution, were established so that any change the United States of America go through did not destroy the citizens of the United States who disagree with such change, and were intended to be permanent and unchangeable unless changed by the American people through a constitutional amendment. Therefore, if barack hussein obama is unhappy with the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and keep and bear arms, he should seek to amend the constitution of the United States in accordance with the procedure established in the constitution not to propose unconstitutional laws or executive orders.
The words of the 2nd amendment to the US constitution recognizing the derivative natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms as a civil right are clear:

“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed”

The 2nd amendment applies to citizens of the United States, who keep and bear personal arms irrespective of purposes - that is, all arms and weapons that can be born by a man, including knives, handguns, semi-automatic and automatic weapons, machine guns, portable grenade launchers, portable rocket launchers, portable anti-aircraft missiles, portable anti-tank missiles, portable naval missiles, appropriate munitions and explosives, light military vehicles and warboats. The 2nd amendment to the US constitution does not apply to the advanced weapons that cannot be born by a man as tanks, military aircrafts and helicopters, warships: such weapons are owned collectively by the American people and belong to the US armed forces and the national guard of the US states. The 2nd amendment to the US constitution does not apply to chemical, biological and nuclear weapons of mass destruction: these weapons are owned solely by the US federal government.

With regard to restrictions, registration with the governments of US states can be required with regard to portable grenade launchers, portable rocket launchers, portable anti-aircraft missiles, portable anti-tank missiles, portable naval missiles, and certain high powered explosives. With regard to all other personal weapons, including automatic weapons and machine guns, no restrictions are constitutionally permissible, and any registration requirements are constitutionally prohibited. Similarly, the United States cannot prohibit convicted felons and criminally insane persons who committed felonies from keeping and bearing arms if it recognizes such persons as citizens of the United States. The United States can and should, however, withdraw citizenship rights from convicted felons and criminally insane persons, who committed felonies on US soil, in accordance with the judgments of US courts: such persons should lose their US citizenship rights if convicted of a felony in trial by jury, which has always been the US government policy in the past. Similarly, the US government can require gun manufacturers to provide to customers a firearm safety course as a part of purchase: the NRA administers many such firearm safety courses across the United States.

A false statement was also made by an official from the US department of defense, who falsely claimed that US citizens did not need so-called assault weapons. The statement is obviously false: the United States simply cannot afford keeping a large army overseas, and keeping a large standing army in peacetime, which was never intended by the founders of the United States. Objectively, the United States will have to evacuate all of its forces outside the United States back to the continental United States, transferring responsibility for their defense back to these nation-states, and common defense agreement organizations of these states as NATO. There is absolutely no need for the US army to be stationed in Europe: European states are rich enough to take care of their national security. Similarly, Japan and South Korea are rich nations, which can take care of their national security, and Japan can develop nuclear weapons if it regards doing so as essential to preserve its sovereignty and independence. While NATO can and should be preserved and extended, by admitting as members all EU member-states willing to become its members as well as Australia and New Zealand, and the process of repatriation of the US army from overseas back to the US territory can be made gradual over seven years to give nation states time to take responsibility for their national security, the process is inevitable. The United States cannot and will not keep a standing army in peacetime: instead, the US navy with a marine corps, the US air force, the US strategic and tactical nuclear force, the US air defense system, adequately scaled back, will be preserved, and the US army disbanded, with the US national guard, commanded by state governors, and consisting of weapon owning citizens taking its place. The US national defense budget will be scaled back from nearly 700 billion USD to no more than 200 billion USD annually to eliminate the enormous US budget deficit. And the US citizens will be permitted not only to own the so-called assault weapons, including machine guns, but also portable grenade launchers, portable rocket launchers, portable anti-aircraft missiles, portable anti-tank missiles, portable naval missiles, explosives and appropriate munitions as guardsmen of the US national guard. The so-called assault weapons are obviously needed for US citizens to defend the United States as well as to hunt a large wild beast as a bear, to resist any infringements by the tyrannical US federal government upon the natural rights, derivative-natural rights, civil rights and traditional rights of US citizens and residents. The US military-industrial complex has to be scaled back, which is a painful, but a necessary and unavoidable process.

A strange motion to limit magazine capacity of weapons was proposed by those who do not understand that it takes as many as 20 rounds to stop an overweight robber, or a rapist, or a bear, not speaking of importance of high capacity magazines for the citizens defending their states from foreign aggression or usurpation of rights of citizens and states by the US federal government. For this reason, this strange suggestion by those who obviously cannot operate a firearm should be rejected. Another strange motion is to institute comprehensive background check for firearm buyers that can only harass law-abiding US citizens. What is in fact necessary is to institute a rule removing US citizenship from all convicted felons and criminally insane persons who committed a felony as well as to require proof of US citizenship as US passport or US birth certificate to purchase a firearm. Actually, the present gun show exception is properly worded and narrowly construed to promote responsible firearm ownership, since gun dealers and the US citizens who offer their guns at gun shows are generally responsible in choosing to whom they sell weapons.

The Papal office in Rome also spoke in favor of gun control, contrary to clear teaching of Lord God Jehovah, Lord Jesus Christ, Holy Spirit on the subject. In fact, Lord God Jehovah ordered a great sword to be given to the sheep, the worshipers of Lord God Jehovah and Lord Jesus Christ (Book of Enoch, Section XVII, Chapter 90), Lord Jesus Christ specifically commanded his followers who had no swords to sell garments and purchase swords (Luke 22:36). The apostles of Lord Jesus Christ had two swords, the assault weapons of that day, the possession of which was forbidden to non-Romans (Luke 22:3. This leaves aside the question of proper deference towards the faithful American Christian churches, since in the United States there is at least one faithful Christian church able to make pronouncements and judgments on important questions, the Westborough Baptist Church of Pastor Fred Phelps. Yet the bishop of Rome left the sound doctrine, replacing the pure Word of God with human imaginations with regard to the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms.

Similarly, unrighteous jews living in the United States took an unhealthy position, attacking the NRA and seeking to unlawfully disarm the Americans, which is completely unacceptable, given that the Word of God is clear on the subject: Lord God Jehovah gave a great sword to the sheep. Some unrighteous jews even demanded that the NRA should not interfere with their unlawful activities to disarm the Americans. Yet the NRA and other patriotic Americans will continue to stand in the way of these unrighteous jews, who will either repent or perish, as Lord God Jehovah and Lord Jesus Christ will fight against them and for the NRA and other patriotic Americans. And the jews who are not happy living in a Christian republic, the United States of America, can of course in all times to emigrate to the state of Israel to live under jewish law in a jewish state.

The reasons for this push to disarm US citizens are obvious. The US public debt is at present 16.4 trillion USD, of which 11.5 trillion USD is held by the public. The US maximum debt carrying capacity estimated as 10% of US federal revenues over the last seven years is 1.8 trillion USD, while the insolvency boundary, indicating impossibility of repayment of US government debt and rendering the US credit rating as D, is nine times the maximum US debt carrying capacity, 16.5 trillion USD. It is clearly obvious that the US cannot repay or service its debts in the long term, and the obama administration wants the insolvency boundary to be crossed, essentially selling the Americans to debt slavery to the foreign nations, which supply credit to refinance US debt obligations, but once the insolvency boundary is crossed, the default on US government debt becomes inevitable.

The obama administration seeks to disarm and enslave US citizens, by assigning them tax and social security numbers, and imposing prohibitive taxes upon them, forcing them to work their own destruction, working more and more for lower and lower wages, unable to purchase a house, to create a family and to support and raise children, in order to pay interest on progressively growing US government debt burden, which cannot be repaid in principle, providing lavish life for economic, social and ethnic elites. Regrettably, the present state of technology is such that continuing such a policy will inevitably lead to implanting microchips into US citizens and creation of a technocratic dictatorship with a sad and tragic end described in the Book of Revelation of John.

The obama administration claims it can repay US government debt by simply printing the necessary amount of money, which is of course true to a point. Yet the consequences of such debt repayment are well known: triple digit inflation, destruction of hundreds of millions of the poor and middle class Americans, who will not be able to afford even food and clothing, and sale of the best US assets to foreigners, and rebellion as a result. Hence, it is not a realistic alternative, even though at some point the United States may have no other choice but to repay its debt in such a destructive way.
fdtwain is offline  
Old April 16th, 2016, 08:27 PM   #5
Banned
 
fdtwain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Europe
Posts: 618
What should be done by patriotic Americans to resist the obama law? First, it is necessary to prepare to resist the democratic enforcers of the will of the totalitarian democratic US government. Every American family should purchase guns: at least one and better two machine guns and/or automatic weapons or semi-automatic weapons with at least 12000 rounds of ammunition per every male member of the household, at least one and better two handguns with at least 1200 rounds of ammunition per every female member of household, and at least two military knives per each member of the household. Furthermore, every American should create 8-year food store to be ready to any disruptions of food supply. Every American family should also purchase a separate residence, and if it possesses sufficient funds, at least a hectare of land per each family member. Finally, every American family should sell the stocks of large corporations, presently overvalued at least 3 times through run away inflation - the consequence of FRS money printing - and put their savings beyond 3- to 6-month salary in cash, in 2/3 into gold and in 1/3 into silver, to preserve their savings from run away inflation, which is inevitable, given the scale of money printing in the US and throughout the world. It is lawful for a US citizen to wound and kill a US official, representative, statesman who tries to forcefully confiscate his weapons, bearing neither legal nor moral responsibility, since it is lawful to kill in defense of movable property (Exodus 22:2). In dealing with obama and his associates, the appropriate way is: resist the devil, and he will flee from you (James 4:7). Finally, it is important for US citizens who have appropriate funds at their disposal to establish a second residence in European states and to purchase property in Europe to be able to flee any federal persecution if such commences.

Some people strangely oppose to US citizens taking responsible measures to protect their future and the future of their families, advising to focus on restoration of American liberty instead. Yet personal preparedness does not contradict taking collective actions to restore American liberty: in fact individual preparedness serves as a basis of taking collective actions to restore American liberty.

Subsequently, it is necessary to organize an effective lobbying effort against any attempts to ratify the UN arms trade treaty and to pass so-called gun control laws in US Congress and the legislatures of US states. The NRA and the Republican party should use the ATT as an opportunity to educate US citizens about the fallacies of gun control and to seek reversal of existing unlawful statutes restricting the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms in US Congress, the congresses of US states, and in US courts. It is also important for the NRA to conduct a public relations campaign to illustrate how wide availability of guns and respect for the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms reduces crime in republican nations as Switzerland, makes a republican nation prepared to resist foreign aggression, and liberates nations as in the case of free Libya, unjustly defamed by some in US Congress.

Furthermore, it is important for US citizens to disobey any executive orders of the US president unlawfully restraining the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms. US citizens should also disobey any state law requiring registration, confiscation or prohibition of firearms, since registration of firearms is unlawful under the 2nd amendment to the US constitution. US citizens should also continue the fight in the US court system against any unlawful laws passed by state legislatures. If any law, restricting the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms, is passed by the US Congress, any executive order restricting the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms is made by the president of the United States, or any judgment of the US supreme court restricting the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms is made, specifically mandating registration, confiscation or prohibition of firearms, US citizens should not comply with the above-mentioned provisions, and the governors and legislatures of the US states should nullify the above-mentioned provisions in the territories of their states by state law, stating the provisions of the 2nd and 10th amendments to the US constitution as basis for nullification. It is important to gradually discard the faulty reasoning that federal law is always superior to state law: in fact, state law, made subject to its reserved powers and the constitution of the United States, can and should be superior to federal law, if it does not exceed state power and is not contrary to the US constitution. Such a state law in such circumstances is legitimate exercise of state authority to prevent federal usurpation of the rights reserved to the states or to the people.

Similarly, if a state law, restricting the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms, is passed by a state legislature, specifically mandating registration, confiscation or prohibition of firearms, US citizens should not comply with the provisions of such a state law, and legislatures of state districts should nullify the above-mentioned provisions of a state law in the territories of their districts by district law, stating the provisions of the 2nd, 10th and 14 th amendments to the US constitution as basis for nullification. In such a case, a district law, made subject to the reserved powers of the people and the constitution of the United States, can and should be superior to a state law, if it does not exceed district power, is made to protect the civil rights of the citizens of the United States and is not contrary to the US constitution. Such a district law in such circumstances is legitimate exercise of district authority to prevent state usurpation of the rights reserved to the people by the bill of rights.

Furthermore, if a particular district law or an act, restricting the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms, is passed in a district, specifically mandating registration, confiscation or prohibition of firearms, US citizens should not comply with the provisions of such a law or an act, state legislature should abolish the district law by the state law, preventing an unconstitutional district law from entering into legal force. Alternatively, such a law should be challenged in a state or federal court to prevent it from entering into legal force.

Finally, if an international treaty is signed by the US president restricting the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and to keep and bear arms, specifically mandating registration, confiscation or prohibition of firearms, such a treaty is invalid from its signing date, being contrary to the provisions of the US constitution, which are always superior to international treaties, the US senate should not ratify such a treaty, the US supreme court should strike down the provisions of such a treaty, US states should nullify such a treaty, and US citizens should not comply with the provisions of such a treaty.

What should discontent citizens, who do not want to possess a firearm and want to live in a community without private firearms ownership do? First, they can collectively purchase land and establish gated communities on private land, where firearms ownership can be temporarily restricted through voluntary agreements between the community and land owners or tenants, provided there is a place in a district, wherein such a community is established, wherein the civil right guaranteed by the 2nd amendment to the US constitution is fully respected. Such a community can hire a private security firm or invite state law enforcement to provide law enforcement services to the community. Alternatively, discontent citizens can lobby for a constitutional amendment reflecting their political ideas, although, given popularity of firearms in the American society, such an amendment is unlikely to be passed. Thus, those Americans who do not want to live with firearms are free to do so, both individually and collectively, as well as to peacefully advocate their political views: they should not, however, conspire to interfere with the constitutional rights of other American citizens through unlawful executive, legislative, or court acts, or through unconstitutional international agreements.

Yet the threat of civilian disarmament in the United States under the obama administration is real. For this reason, important measures should be taken by patriotic US citizens to secure their constitutional rights.

Firstly, the self-defense militias of the American people should be formed in all US states and districts. These militias should work independently or in association with the NRA and/or as a part of the US national guard to protect Christian faith and the Law of the Lord, customs and traditions of the American people, and the natural, derivative natural, civil and traditional rights of US citizens and residents as well as the rights and authority of US states and districts against federal usurpation or foreign aggression. The federal, state and district government should not harass the activists of the self-defense militias of the American people or try to disarm or dismantle the self-defense militias of the American people. The self-defense militias of the American people should concentrate on identifying and reporting criminals and illegal immigrants in their communities, assisting the national guard of the borderline US states to protect the US border, and preparing and training to resist federal usurpation or foreign aggression. State governors should facilitate the activities of the self-defense militias of the American people in their state by promoting law enforcement training and military training for militia members in association with members of the US national guard and the state police. The governors of the US states should also develop contingency plans for the national guard of the US state to replace US army units for defense of their respective states, and should be ready to order the national guard of their respective states to resist any unconstitutional federal executive orders, laws or courts decisions.

Secondly, judging Christian churches should be established in every US district and a judging church should establish a Christian religious court in every US district. A Christian religious court should judge all civil cases with the value of disputed property not exceeding the market value of 14700 ounces of silver if both sides of the case agree to the judgment. Furthermore, a judging Christian church should register births, deaths and marriages and should justify Christians who kill in the following circumstances in accordance with judgments of Lord God Jehovah, Lord Jesus Christ, Holy Spirit, bearing neither legal nor moral responsibility:

- it is lawful to take property, wound and kill those who commit the abominable deeds of sexual perversions (homosexuality (Leviticus 20:13), lesbianism (Leviticus 20:13), bestiality (Leviticus 20:15), incest (Leviticus 20:11-17), pedophilia (sexual relations with girls below 12 years of age) (Leviticus 20:2-3, Matthew 18:6)), abominations (child murders (abortions) (Leviticus 20:2-3, Exodus 21:22-25), change of gender (Book of Enoch Section XVII, Chapter 86, Section II, Chapter 10), cannibalism (Book of Enoch, Section II, Chapter 7,10), human cloning (Book of Enoch Section XVII, Chapter 86, Section II, Chapter 10)), intentional murder (Exodus 21:14), enslavement of men/women (Exodus 21:16) or selling of men/women to slavery (Exodus 21:16);
- it is lawful to wound and kill in defense of life (Exodus 21:14), liberty (Exodus 21:16), movable property, land up 100 hectares per man/family and real estate upon such land (Exodus 22:2), dignity from rape, which in its nature is enslavement (Exodus 21:16) and physical assault, which in its nature is attempted murder (Exodus 21:14);
- it is lawful for a US citizen to warn a foreign citizen, or a non-citizen, not born in the territory of the USA, to leave the territory of the USA, and if such a foreign citizen or a non-citizen does not leave on his or her own, subsequently forcefully repatriate such a foreign citizen or a non-citizen (Exodus 23:4). If such a foreign citizen resists repatriation, it is lawful to take property, wound and kill such a foreign citizen or a non-citizen, for such came to steal, kill and destroy (John 10:1,10; Exodus 21:14; Exodus 22:2);
- it is lawful for a US citizen to warn a foreign armed soldier to leave the territory of the USA, and if such an armed foreign soldier does not leave on his own, it is lawful to take property, wound and kill such a foreign armed soldier, he is an enslaver (Exodus 21:16);
- it is lawful for US citizen(s) to take property, wound and kill soldiers of aggressive foreign nations and their armed collaborators in a war against foreign aggression until just peace is established, those who initiated an aggressive war punished, and the territorial integrity of the states against which an aggressive war was waged is restored (Exodus 17:14,16, I Samuel 15:3);
- it is lawful to wound and kill a government official who takes children from parents for the cause other than infliction of a physical disability or engaging a child into prostitution or production of pornography - he is an enslaver (Exodus 21:16);
- it is lawful to wound and kill those who forcefully impose electronic numbers for taxpayers and social security identification, forcefully impose any marks, numbers, writings, microchips upon human skin or inside human body for any reason, forcefully collect and store biometric information as fingerprints, eye scan, DNA-samples, without a written court order supported by clear and compelling evidence, sufficient to accuse of felony a person from whom biometric evidence is collected - such are enslavers (Exodus 21:16);
- it is lawful to wound and kill a man-god and his followers who force men to worship him as god and forcefully impose any marks, numbers, writings, microchips upon human skin or inside human body for any reason (Revelation 19:20-21);
- it is lawful to wound and kill a government official, who arrests, imprisons, condemns to forced labor, condemns to forced medical treatment, wounds or kills in retaliation of exercise of the derivative-natural rights to absolute freedom of speech, freedom of peaceful assembly and association, freedom of Christian religion, derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and keep and bear arms - such is an enslaver (Exodus 21:16);
- it is lawful for a husband or a wife who has committed no adultery to wound and kill a wife or husband who has committed adultery (Leviticus 20:10).

A judging Christian church shall absolve the US citizens and residents who kill in aforementioned circumstances of any legal or moral responsibility for their just deeds by an act of remission of sins. Furthermore, a judging Christian church shall begin to compile the lists of US citizens and residents, residing in a district, who committed the abominable deeds of sexual perversions (homosexuality, lesbianism, bestiality, incest, pedophilia (sexual relations with girls below 12 years of age)), abominations (child murders (abortions), change of gender, cannibalism, human cloning), intentional murder, enslavement of men/women or selling of men/women to slavery, and to put such lists to the internet for faithful Christians to avoid dealing with the doers of the abominable deeds.

Christian churches in US districts should promote home schooling for European (White) and Christian children, by establishing websites with home schooling resources in association with HSLDA and should establish at least one Christian non-government liberal art academy providing classical education, a Christian non-government trade academy teaching business trades and professions, and a Christian non-government technical college teaching technical sciences in each US district. These educational institutions should award their own qualifications, not certified by the state or certification agencies, and should specifically require its staff and students to be Christians.

Christian churches in US districts should establish at least one Christian charitable medical clinic in each US district, providing preventative medical care and basic medical care to patients on the basis of ability to pay and independent of US insurance schemes. This medical clinic should specifically require its staff and students to be Christians.

Christian churches in US districts and states should establish citizens’ district and state councils, by electing two competent and moral representatives from each Christian church into the district council for the term of one year, and two competent and moral representatives from each district council into a state council for the term of two years. Each district and state council in association with appropriate non-government organizations should monitor and report legal acts of the US government infringing upon the natural rights, derivative-natural rights, civil rights, traditional rights of the citizens and residents of the United States, the rights and authority of the US districts and states.

Specifically, citizens’ district and state councils should focus on:

- lobbying the state governments to issue gold and silver coins and bullion and passing legal tender laws authorizing gold and silver coins and bullion as legal tender in the territory of each state, valued at current market price expressed in US dollars;
- lobbying US state governments and the US federal government to repatriate all illegal immigrants from the territory of the United States and to construct an appropriate fence on the US-Mexico border to eliminate long-term unemployment in the United States largely caused by mass illegal immigration;
- lobbying the US federal government to dissolve the NAFTA trade agreement and to focus on admitting Canadian provinces to the United States of America as new US states;
- repealing all existing legal statutes, infringing upon the derivative-natural rights to absolute freedom of speech, freedom of peaceful assembly and association, freedom of Christian religion, the derivative-natural right to a personal weapon and keep and bear arms, the other civil rights of US citizens, districts and states guaranteed by the Bill of Rights;
- prohibiting by state and federal law and preferably by constitutional amendments to state and the US constitution, forceful imposition of electronic numbers for taxpayers and social security identification, forceful imposition of any marks, numbers, writings, microchips upon human skin or inside human body for any reason, forceful collection and storage of biometric information as fingerprints, eye scan, DNA-samples, without a written court order supported by clear and compelling evidence sufficient to accuse of felony a person from whom biometric evidence is collected;
- establishing the death penalty in all cases in US federal and state law as punishment of the doers of the abominable deeds of sexual perversions (homosexuality, lesbianism, bestiality, incest, pedophilia (sexual relations with girls below 12 years of age)), abominations (child murders (abortions), change of gender, cannibalism, human cloning), intentional murder, enslavement of men/women or selling of men/women to slavery, and absolving by US federal and state law from legal responsibility those who take property, wound and kill the doers of the abominable deeds of sexual perversions (homosexuality, lesbianism, bestiality, incest, pedophilia (sexual relations with girls below 12 years of age)), abominations (child murders (abortions), change of gender, cannibalism, human cloning), intentional murder, enslavement of men/women or selling of men/women to slavery;
- lobbying the US federal government to strengthen NATO and to admit Australia and New Zealand as NATO members if these nations wish so;
- establishing US foreign policy on the basis of US exceptionalism, making the US neither an imperial nation, nor a part of the global government, but a first-class regional great power preserving its exclusive interests in Latin America and NATO military alliance, and building relations with all other nations on the basis of bilateral mutually beneficial peaceful cooperation, promoting regional economic integration rather than global government or global governance schemes;
- promotion of restoration of the United States of America to its European (White), Christian and republican roots, and peaceful repatriation of the US citizens and residents of non-White ethnicity back to their respective nations or third nations, wherein those US citizens and residents can play a positive role in promoting political rights and freedoms and economic development;
- cooperating with the US Republican party to nominate competent and moral candidates to all district, state and federal government positions throughout the United States to provide economically and politically sound policy alternatives to the American people, consistent with Christian faith and the Law of the Lord, customs and traditions of the American people, natural rights, derivative-natural rights, civil rights and traditional rights of US citizens and residents;
- cooperating with the US Republican party to propose to US Congress a realistic debt restructuring and debt repayment plan as well as appropriate reduction in US federal spending;
- cooperating with the US Republican party to propose to US Congress a realistic taxation reduction plan to gradually reduce federal taxes to 10% income tax, 10% social tax, and 10% customs tariff with the exclusion of all other taxes as US national debt is progressively paid;
- cooperating with the US Republican party to reduce the scope of the US federal government and gradually restore to the states, districts and the American people the rights reserved to them by the 10th amendment to the US constitution;
- promotion of establishment of small and medium-sized American businesses hiring American citizens and producing goods on US soil in association with appropriate non-government organizations and financial institutions.

How should an American citizen react to any gun confiscation scheme, either state or federal? An American citizen should at least shut himself in his house and prepare to shoot any enforcers of an unconstitutional gun confiscation scheme, justly killing in defense of his property: the blood of such enforcers is upon them. An American citizen should fight such enforcers to the last men, woman and child of his family, and should remember what judeo-bolsheviks did to the Russians, who foolishly permitted themselves to be disarmed, arresting and torturing them. Thus it is better to die free, fighting in dignity than to be tortured by such enforcers who routinely permit their inmates to be raped by negroes and other non-Whites, loosing dignity, for the worst federal enforcers can do to dead bodies is to violate them as US soldiers regularly do to dead Taliban freedom fighters and other dead enemies. Those American citizens who are able should act in the self-defense militias of the American people, should hunt and shoot down such enforcers of an unconstitutional gun confiscation scheme, and should furthermore be prepared to hunt and shoot down all doers of the abominable deeds of sexual perversions (homosexuality, lesbianism, bestiality, incest, pedophilia (sexual relations with girls below 12 years of age)), abominations (child murders (abortions), change of gender, cannibalism, human cloning), intentional murder, enslavement of men/women or selling of men/women to slavery in their districts and states, eradicating filth from US soil, who bring degeneration and trouble, and should repatriate the jews and non-Whites from the United States of America to their nations or third countries. District and states councils should coordinate the activities of the self-defense militias of the American people in resistance to gun confiscation schemes together with patriotic district and state governments and the US national guard, until US soil is liberated and a gun confiscation scheme repealed. Subsequently, the US federal government should be restructured, reelected and reappointed, all unconstitutional legislation repealed and American liberty restored.

Thus, US nationalists, patriots, republicans, conservatives, fundamentalists and European (White) men and women will successfully resist any gun registration, prohibition, or confiscation scheme proposed by the obama administration and coalition of zionists, masons, democrats, communists, socialists and coloreds that support it. And US nationalists, patriots, republicans, conservatives, fundamentalists and European (White) men and women will defend American liberty with firearms till death, keeping their firearms in defiance of the UN arms trade treaty and any obama gun-control law in their cold dead hand, if necessary.
fdtwain is offline  
Old April 16th, 2016, 08:28 PM   #6
Banned
 
fdtwain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Europe
Posts: 618
Back door to slavery

The wise and proper decision of the republican party to shut down the US federal government was taken to prevent re-enslavement of the American people by so-called obamacare, increased US government debt ceiling and growing US federal budget deficit.

The so-called individual mandate, the requirement to purchase medical insurance, opens a back door to slavery in the United States of America.

It is important to understand that medical care in human history has never been a right and always a privilege. Provision of medical care to those prudent enough to store part of their income to cover health care expenditures ensured their better health and longer lifespan as well as healthier and more abundant progeny, allowing for gradual racial improvement with each new generation. Similarly, withdrawal of medical care from those unproductive and imprudent, unable to pay its costs, shortens their lifespan and makes their progeny less numerous, naturally reducing the numbers of the weaker and dumber part of human population that generally reproduces more abundantly, relieving their burden upon human society. Christian societies developed a successful way for Christians willing to help the poor members of society to access medical care: provision of free medical care in charitable clinics, and taking Hippocratic oath seriously, by providing medical care to the poor in exchange for what they are able to pay without hardship. Thus, provision of medical care belongs primarily to the private sector or charitable organizations, and any attempts at provision of medical care at the federal level are illegitimate, as US constitution does not give the US federal government the power to regulate healthcare.

The appropriate way to extend any government subsidies for health care is at district and state level out of social security taxes through which no more than 10% of taxpayer’s income is collected after all other social security needs of the population are met. Any other attempts to extend subsidies for medical care lead to manifold increases in costs of medical care, rationing of medical care, reduction in the rate of medical innovations, and dehumanization of patients, the extreme examples of which happen in Russia, where healthy unborn babies are aborted, and organs are extracted from healthy men and women in state medical facilities to provide transplants for the wealthy and the powerful.

Currently, large federal subsidies for medical care through medicare and medicaid programs, directed to medical insurance companies and large hospitals that cooperate with them, costly and time-consuming process for approval of new medical drugs and procedures, lack of limited responsibility for medical professionals for malpractice, cumbersome licensing requirements for medical professionals, have driven up the prices of medical insurance and health care 2-3 times above the real costs of medical care and significantly lowered the quality of medical care available to most Americans. As a result, many poor and middle class American families cannot afford health insurance, and make a free and rational choice to remain uninsured. Consequently, US insurance companies and hospitals are increasingly losing income. Unhappy with decreased revenue, US medical and insurance industry lobbyists in US congress have encouraged US congress to pass the affordable medical care act to force middle class American families either purchase medical insurance or pay a penalty to the US government to be used to subsidize free medical care for the poor Americans. This legislation is a huge taxpayer-funded subsidy to US insurance and medical industry, yet it involves many existential dangers, mortal to the cause of liberty in America. Essentially, passage of this legislation is declaration of civil war upon the remnant of individualist God-fearing Americans who actually built America, opening a back door to slavery.
There are many dangers associated with the requirement to purchase medical insurance. One is associated with the disclosure of medical and genetic information, collected by insurance companies, increasingly digitalized and easily available to prospective employers of an insured person. As a result, sick people or people predisposed to sickness, yet able to work productively, will inevitably see the pool of employment choices severely restricted as a result of passage of this legislation. Additionally, the legislation will further forcefully impose the use of social security numbers, being precursor to implantation of microchips in US population devised by global economic, social and ethnic elites as a control mechanism over the behavior of the Americans. Finally, this legislation unlawfully and groundlessly seeks to interfere with the derivative-natural right to economic freedom and derivative-natural right to live one’s own life as one sees fit by attempting to force the Americans with alternative lifestyles to work to cover the costs of medical insurance they consciously and willingly refused to take up, preferring a shorter lifespan life of increased leisure. Essentially, this unlawful and groundless legislation seeks to open a door to slavery, to enslave those Americans unwilling to support the democratic political and globalist capitalist economic system for the benefit of globalist economic, social and ethnic elites.

It is essential to remember the definition of the derivative-natural right to economic freedom: an individual right either to refuse to take part in an economic transaction according to one’s own will or to freely engage in an economic transaction on terms acceptable to such an individual. Any interference with the above-mentioned right constitutes enslavement of man, unless the way of exercising of the above-mentioned right is clearly, directly and significantly hazardous to other people’s life and health. In the above-mentioned case the refusal of some Americans to purchase medical insurance harms other people’s life and health in no way: those willing to purchase medical insurance can still work, earn a living and purchase medical insurance out of fruits of their own labor if they wish so. At the same time, provision of emergency medical care is not an inherent human right, but a privilege, conditional upon covering the costs of medical care. While in well-organized societies the natural right to life may include provision of emergency medical care, it is done voluntarily out of morality and charity shared by those engaged in medical profession, and not by compulsory legislation, for the natural right to life does not include the right to be forcefully kept alive against the individual will or the right of an individual to be kept alive at other people’s expense beyond provision of employment, paying monthly wages sufficient for purchase of decent food, clothing, covering costs of constructing an adequate residence, and leaving 1/3 to be spent as an individual wishes to all willing to undertake employment - that is, the current market value of 30 ounces of silver, or giving those unable to find employment a subsidy to begin their own business once every 7 years - that is, the current market value of 2520 ounces of silver, paid out of tax revenues collected from social tax of no more than 10% of annual income of individuals and corporations. In fact, as Plato and Socrates wisely noted many thousand years ago, a man obeying the commandments of God does not need medical care, and sickness is usually a result of a sinful or reckless lifestyle, so a well-organized God-fearing republic needs few doctors. Therefore, an appropriate way of dealing with growing costs of medical care is deregulation of medical profession and repeal of obligation of hospitals to extend medical care to those unable to afford it.

After the affordable medical care act was passed, the group of individuals and states rightfully concerned with its implications for liberty in the US, sued in federal court to have it declared unconstitutional, being clearly outside of the scope of congressional authority and contrary to the 10th amendment to the US constitution. The US appeal court struck down the so-called individual mandate, but the US supreme court reversed the ruling, re-establishing the individual mandate, the individual requirement to purchase medical insurance, while allowing states to opt-out of the requirements of the legislation. The US supreme court decision is very dangerous by seeking to compel millions of the Americans to engage in the market for medical insurance, many of whom will simply not have sufficient income to do so, forcing them to purchase a product they do not necessarily need or to pay a penalty to the federal government to be used to subsidize other people’s medical care. Even more dangerous are groundless and outrageous claims of the US supreme court in the text of the decision that US congress is free to order US citizens to behave in a certain manner within the scope of its authority, imposing as punishments imprisonment, deprivation of civil rights and even loss of children’s custody as punishment for non-compliance. In fact, the death penalty and imprisonment for the period not exceeding seven years as punishments can only be used with regard to the crimes of violence and the crimes of grave moral turpitude of homosexuality, lesbianism, bestiality, incest, pedophilia (sexual relations with girls below 12 years of age), change of gender, human cloning. All other acts proscribed by law, insofar not contrary to natural rights, derivative-natural rights, civil rights can constitute either misdemeanors punished by double restitution of actual damages, corporal punishment up to ten lashes, fines not exceeding the market value of 14700 ounces of silver, or civil infractions, subject to civil penalties. As for lawless decisions of the US supreme court, permitting criminal punishments where no crime of violence or no crime of great moral turpitude has been committed, such should be repealed swiftly.

Otherwise, the United States as many other states, nations and peoples that existed in the past will learn the hard way that every state, nation or people, no matter how advanced, that dares to interfere with natural rights, derivative-natural rights, civil rights of residents and citizens on its territory, is swiftly destroyed as history manifested so many times. In fact, the affordable medical care act is clearly unconstitutional legislation, as four dissenting judges of the US supreme court, and especially forcefully the US supreme court judge Scalia clearly established, and was affirmed for political reasons by machinations of two jewish justices, kagan and ginsburg, long known to support the legislation in question, and betrayal of duty by neoconservative judge roberts. As in ancient Athens where similar legislation led to enslavement of a wide part of Athenian society, and a civil war in Athens that was ended by the reforms of great republican legislator and emancipator Solon the lawgiver, who abolished unjust laws, the affordable medical care act is opening a back door to enslavement of the US poor and middle-class and is essentially the declaration of war upon the US poor and middle class by global economic, social and ethnic elites, seeking to live in luxury of other people’s labor. Essentially, the affordable medical care act declares that the Americans should have a particular level of civilization, which medical care entails whether they earned it or not, and whether a society has means to achieve it or not, subjecting those unable or unwilling to provide for it to a significant penalty to be used to subsidize that civilization level for others.

It is true that penalties imposed by the affordable medical care act have not been enforced so far, beyond allowing the IRS to deduct the penalty from the tax refund. But US history clearly shows that it is only a question of time until mandates on individual citizens are extended to education and other areas with severe penalties for non-compliance, and non-paid penalties are treated as tax debts, since the US supreme court groundlessly declared a penalty to be a tax, having specifically disregarded the well-known facts that taxes, in contrast to penalties, are collected for engaging in commercial taxable activity, and not for inactivity. Increasingly, the US supreme court unlawfully and groundlessly permits US congress to penalize people for making the private choices the majority of US citizens do not approve and that do not clearly, directly or significantly affect them in any way, which is a textbook definition of tyranny, enslavement of men by the government. But the human community consists not only of the individuals whose life choices are acceptable to the majority of men, but also of those whose life choices may be reckless, unacceptable or even abhorrent to the majority of men. Yet, short of the abominable deeds of sexual perversions (homosexuality, lesbianism, bestiality, incest, pedophilia (sexual relations with girls below 12 years of age)), abominations (child murders (abortions), change of gender, cannibalism, human cloning), those choices are their private matter, for which the government can subject them to no penalties whatsoever.

Furthermore, the US federal government simply does not have revenue to fund obamacare. US federal budget deficit in 2013 is 900 billion USD, and annual costs of obamacare are estimated to be additional 200-350 billion USD a year over the next 5 years. Reasonable estimates suggest health insurance premiums actually being 20-30% higher for obamacare participants in comparison with present health insurance policies. Finally, the costs of healthcare insurance and healthcare in general will skyrocket: when the individuals who lead risky lifestyles realize that their healthcare costs - consequences of their free lifestyle choices - are funded by prudent and hard-working citizens, such individuals will lead even riskier lifestyles, indulging in drugs, alcohol, smoking, sexual excesses and perversions with predictable health consequences for which others will be forced to pay.

What should be done? First, the affordable medical care act could and should be nullified by the US states and repealed by US congress. As senator Cruz has correctly stated obamacare can be defeated and will be defeated, and US citizens need to be explained that obamacare makes no sense either to them or to the US federal government, and is in fact a Ponzi scheme dangerous for American freedom. The US supreme court should also reconsider its decision and struck down the obamacare individual mandate, inconsistent with the derivative-natural rights to economic freedom, given manifold dangers of this legislation. Yet this legislation manifests a dangerous trend towards enslavement of US citizens and residents by the US government. Thus, republican, conservative, patriotic, nationalist and fundamentalist US citizens should not comply with either the individual mandate or penalty and prepare their arms to be ready to shoot those US bureaucrats, representatives and statesmen who try to arrest, imprison, condemn to forced labor, condemn to forced medical treatment, kill or wound them, take property, take children for non-complying with individual mandates, bearing neither legal nor moral responsibility, fulfilling the clear commandment of God:

Exodus 21:16
And he that stealeth a man and selleth him or if he be found in his hand he shall surely be put to death

This legislation crosses the Rubicon between civil peace and civil strife, between a free republic and totalitarian democracy in America. Thus it is necessary for republican, conservative, patriotic, nationalist and fundamentalist US citizens to be ready to resist with law and arms the government enslavers seeking to enslave men for common good, as they claim, to swiftly finish off government enslavers and to send government enslavers where those properly belong - to hell. Yet this legislation is only a part of present dangers to freedom of the American people.

Another danger to American freedom is growing US government debt. The US public debt is at present 16.4 trillion USD, of which 11.5 trillion USD is held by the public. During the obama administration US government debt grew by 6.1 billion USD, or by nearly 60%. The US maximum debt carrying capacity estimated as 10% of US federal revenues over the last seven years is 1.8 trillion USD, while the insolvency boundary, indicating impossibility of repayment of US government debt and rendering the US credit rating as D, is nine times the maximum US debt carrying capacity - 16.5 trillion USD. It is clearly obvious that the US cannot repay or service its debts in the long term, and the obama administration wants the insolvency boundary to be crossed, essentially selling the Americans to debt slavery to the foreign nations which supply credit to refinance US debt obligations, but once the insolvency boundary is crossed, the default on US government debt becomes inevitable. Therefore, there are no objective reasons whatsoever for increase in US government debt ceilings, and US Congress shall reject all requests to increase US government debt ceiling from the obama administration, given that the obama administration has already overspent trillions of dollars in peacetime.

Another danger to American freedom is growing US federal budget deficit - 900 billion USD in 2013 - that results in growing US government debt. There is only one reasonable way out of the present mess - to balance the US budget:

- by reducing by 500 billion USD annual US defense expenditures through ending the misnamed war on terrorism, withdrawal of US armed forces from overseas over the next seven years, transfer of US overseas military bases to the nations within which US overseas military bases are situated, dissolution of the US army, strengthening the national guard of the US states, and concentration of defense spending upon the US navy and marine corps, the US air force, the US missile defense system, the US strategic and tactical nuclear forces, which are sufficient to address any existing threats to US national defense in peacetime;
- abolishing Medicare/Medicaid, saving 950 billion USD;
- abolishing US education department and discontinuation of the US federal educational loans and grants program, saving 70 billion USD;
- abolishing the US department of homeland security, dangerous to American freedom, and investigating its activities, saving 60 billion USD;
- abolishing EPA, NSF and SEC, saving 20 billion USD.

In such a way the US federal budget is balanced, and 700 billion USD annually are freed towards repayment of US government debt. Subsequently, US government debt should be restructured: all debt held by US federal agencies should be retired, 70% of the face value of the outstanding US government debt to the public written off, the remaining US federal debt of 3.5 trillion USD should be converted into 7- year 2% US government bonds, and 570 billion USD annually allocated to pay interest and repay the US federal debt. In such a way the US federal debt is repaid in seven years, and approximately 200 billion USD annually that are presently used to cover interest expenses remain to cover emergency transitional spending associated with such profound restructuring of the US federal government and US government debt, permitting to significantly reduce US taxes within seven years. Regrettably, this is objectively the only realistic way of restructuring US debt, and any suggestions to increase US debt ceiling should be rejected by US congress, no matter how hard those suggestions are peddled and whoever peddles them.

Additionally two constitutional amendments should be passed by US Congress: one amendment, the balanced budget amendment, should prohibit government spending in excess of tax revenues in times of peace, the other amendment, the debt limit amendment, should prohibit incurring national debt in excess of 10% of government tax revenues within the last seven years in times of peace, incurring national debt in excess of 20% of government tax revenues within the last seven years in times of war, and permit one time unilateral restructuring of US government debt, writing off all intra-government holdings of US government debt and 70% of the nominal value of the US government debt held by the public. It is plainly obvious that 1.8 trillion USD in US government spending is more than enough to win any war even against a great regional power, and if a war continues, which is highly unlikely, additional US government debt can be authorized by a constitutional amendment.

The obama administration claims it can repay US government debt by simply printing the necessary amount of money, which is of course true to a point. Yet the consequences of such debt repayment are well known: triple digit inflation, destruction of hundreds of millions of the poor and middle class Americans, who will not be able to afford even food and clothing, and sale of the best US assets to foreigners, and a rebellion as the result. Hence, it is not a realistic alternative, even though at some point the United States may have no other choice but to repay its debt in such a destructive way.

The United States of America indeed presently comes through perilous times, yet dangers to American freedom shall be swiftly and courageously addressed by US Congress: obamacare repealed, US budget deficit balanced and US government debt restructured to secure the blessings of liberty to US citizens and not to permit slavery to return through a back door to the land of the free United States of America, a truly exceptional nation.
fdtwain is offline  
Old April 16th, 2016, 10:38 PM   #7
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Earth
Posts: 1,028
I thought my posts were long! Shit! Write a book and sell it on Amazon!
Thanks from caconservative and Clara007
senor boogie woogie is offline  
Old April 16th, 2016, 10:48 PM   #8
Banned
 
fdtwain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Europe
Posts: 618
Quote:
Originally Posted by senor boogie woogie View Post
I thought my posts were long! Shit! Write a book and sell it on Amazon!
Frankly, my humble person engages in business for living, and follows the advice of wise king Solomon:

Proverb 23:23
Buy the truth, and sell it not, also wisdom, and instruction, and understanding.

Words, truth, wisdom, instruction, understanding are not merchandise to be bought and sold, but public service to the commonwealth that a man or a woman freely undertakes out of civic duty neither desiring nor expecting anything in return.
fdtwain is offline  
Old April 17th, 2016, 05:17 AM   #9
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: massachusetts
Posts: 8,858
Rather than cut and paste huge screeds, that frankly, no one is going to read, try to pick a topic, and link to some information on that topic.
But keep it succinct, because this isn't a doctoral thesis forum.
Thanks from Twisted Sister
goober is online now  
Old April 17th, 2016, 11:18 AM   #10
Banned
 
fdtwain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Europe
Posts: 618
Preserving American freedom

American freedom can still be preserved, yet strict and consistent measures should be taken to ensure this.

The misnamed war on terrorism, war against islam shall be ended by the United States of America. Terrorism is tactics, and real terrorists - those who kill civilians for no objective reason - are few in number, do not require war to be waged against them and can be taken care of by drone strikes. Regretfully, since the premature bombardment of Kosovo, wherein a just partition of Kosovo between Kosovar Albanians and Northern Kosovo Serbs was achievable, were the Milosevic dictatorship subjected to adequate international pressure, and is still achievable as the only reasonable solution to the Kosovo issue, the US military, swayed by just anger over 9/11 attack, have engaged in unnecessary wars against Iraq and Afghanistan. The war in Iraq could have won by supplying Iraqi freedom fighters with personal weapons, yet withdrawal of US armed forces from Iraq permitted the US military to end this unnecessary war. Similarly, the US military shall swiftly withdraw from Afghanistan, permitting the legitimate Taliban government supported by the great majority of the Afghan people to return to power in Afghanistan. The Taliban government is still much underappreciated for the excellent job it did to rid Afghanistan of heroin trade, and osama bin laden could and should have taken care of with an appropriate letter of reprisal authorizing appropriate air force and missile strikes as republican statesman Ron Paul wisely and properly suggested. Finally, Kosovo was shall be finally settled by the United States of America by encouraging just partition of Kosovo between Serbian Northern Kosovo to be reunited with Serbia, and Albanian Kosova to be reunited with Albania, with the establishment of the autonomous and self-governed province of Serbian Northern Kosovo within Kosovo similar to the Serbian republic of Bosnia-Herzegovina as an interim solution. The infamous Guantanamo prison shall be closed down, and all persons held therein either tried in US military courts or transferred to their nations or safe third countries willing to accept them.

With regard to the Syrian civil war, the United States of America shall be ready to undertake limited air force and missile strikes, primarily to destroy Syrian chemical weapons of mass destruction, should the assad regime renege on its commitment to destroy Syrian chemical weapons of mass destruction or unduly prolong the process of their destruction beyond the end of 2014. In such circumstances, US Congress shall be ready to swiftly debate and pass a joint resolution of both houses of US Congress, authorizing limited air force and missile strikes:

- to destroy air bases, helicopters, aircrafts, chemical weapons depots belonging to the assad regime and air defenses protective of those, significantly reducing the threat posed by the assad regime to the Syrian people and neighboring nations, including a US ally, Turkey;
- to establish and to defend from the air the no-flight zone from the Turkish border to the city of Aleppo to permit a return and settlement of hundreds of thousands of Syrian refugees from Turkey to Syria as well as settlement of hundreds of thousands of internally displaced Syrian citizens, expelled by the assadites;
- to provide 10000 tons of personal weapons, appropriate munitions, appropriate non-lethal military and medical equipment per month to the Syrian liberation army, supplying Syrian freedom fighters in their just and legitimate struggle for Syrian freedom.

In such circumstances, the US navy and allied navies shall be ready to swiftly carry out limited air force and missile strikes against the assad regime, if US Congress authorizes these strikes. If the assad regime destroys its chemical weapons by the end of 2014, no US air force and missile strikes are necessary. The United States shall also support Syrian freedom fighters, who will win the Syrian civil war by mid-2014 at the latest, supplying the Syrian liberation army with at least 10000 tons of personal weapons per month, in particular military knives, handguns, semi-automatic and automatic rifles, machine guns, grenades, portable grenade launchers, portable missile launchers, portable anti-aircraft missiles, portable anti-tank missiles, portable naval missiles and appropriate munitions to permit the Syrian liberation army and other brigades of Syrian freedom fighters to swiftly win the Syrian civil war and topple the bloody and blasphemous assad regime, liberating the long-suffering Syrian people. The overall goal of the US foreign policy towards Syria shall be removal of the bloody assad regime that committed genocide and war crimes against the Syrian people.

The US army shall be withdrawn from overseas nations back to the United States, the US army bases shall be transferred under the control of the nations in which they are situated, or under NATO control, and the US army disbanded within the next seven years. The United States of America needs no standing army in peacetime, instead retiring US soldiers shall be given an opportunity to enroll in the national guard of US states. Allied nations or national liberation movements can be supported with sales of US conventional weapons, and it is one of the reasons why the so-called UN arms trade treaty (ATT) is completely unacceptable for the United States of America.

Instead, the United States of America shall limit US defense spending to 200 billion USD per year and concentrate upon the US navy and marine corps, the US air force, the US missile defense system, the US strategic and tactical nuclear forces, which are sufficient to address any existing threats to US national defense in peacetime. In particular, the US missile defense system in Europe shall be deployed as planned and operated jointly with NATO, F-35 joint strike fighter for the US air force developed and fully funded and all naval ships for the US navy fully funded and acquired. Furthermore, the US shall undertake no more nuclear disarmament commitments, as US strategic and tactical nuclear arsenal is already sufficiently cut, concentrating upon destruction of chemical and biological weapons of mass destruction.

The United States of America should dissolve NAFTA, gradually integrate Canadian provinces as states of the United States of America, and shall apply the Monroe doctrine, protecting strategic national interests of the United States of America in Latin America to the exclusion of other powers and developing relations with Latin American nations on bilateral basis.

The United States of America shall preserve and strengthen NATO, by inviting Australia and New Zealand to join NATO.

The United States of America shall support completion of EU enlargement with the accession of Moldavia (without Transnistria) either as an independent state or in reunification with Romania, as the EU has neither financial nor institutional capacity to support further enlargement for the next 20 years.

Japan is an old ally of the United States of America - a great regional power that shall gradually take full responsibility for its national defense and develop nuclear weapons if Japan desires so. Furthermore, the United States of America shall support Japan in its just territorial demands with regard to four Kurili islands, unlawfully occupied by Russia after the 2nd world war, to be returned to Japan.

South Korea is an old ally of the Unites States of America, which shall gradually take full responsibility for its national defense. After reunification with North Korea, Korea will become a great regional power with nuclear weapons, which Korea shall preserve if it wishes so, given a long history of aggressive wars against the long suffering Korean people. Furthermore, the United States of America shall continue to impose strict military and economic sanctions on North Korea until reunification of Korea, and assist the national defense of South Korea by appropriate sales of US conventional weapons.

Taiwan is an old ally of the Unites States of America, which shall gradually take full responsibility for its national defense. It is important for the Unites States of America to support peaceful reunification of China according to the principle: one country, two systems, with the transition period of 100 years, permitting Taiwan to retain autonomy, self-government and national defense forces as the national guard of Taiwan. Until reunification, the United States of America shall assist the national defense of Taiwan by appropriate sales of US conventional weapons.

Turkey is an old ally of the United States of America - a great regional power that shall gradually take full responsibility for its national defense and develop nuclear weapons if Turkey desires so. The United States of America shall support the end of EU membership of Turkey’s bid, as Turkey increasingly acknowledges its islamic identity and seeks its future within the islamic world. The United States of America shall:

- acknowledge Cyprus as the Turkish isle that Turkey is free to annex if Turkey wishes so;
- support just partition of Kosovo between Serbian Northern Kosovo to be reunited with Serbia, and Albanian Kosova to be reunited with Albania;
- support reunification of the Serbian republic of Bosnia-Herzegovina and Serbia;
- acknowledge Albania (including Albanian Kosova) and Bosnia (without the Serbian republic of Bosnia-Herzegovina) as part of Turkish sphere of influence;
- support Turkey to extend its sphere of influence over the Central Asian nations of Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan to assist these Central Asian nations in becoming part of the islamic world, to encourage Kazakhstan to exit the collective security treaty organization and the Eurasian union and to develop close trade and economic cooperation with China;
- support Turkey to extend its sphere of influence over the islamic nations of Russia: Chechnya, Ingushetia, Dagestan, Kabardino-Balkaria, Karachay-Cherkessia, Adygea, Tatarstan, Bashkortostan once these nations obtain freedom and independence from Russia to assist these islamic nations in becoming part of the islamic world;
- support Turkey in strengthening the economic cooperation organization with Iran and Pakistan to assist the Central Asian nations of Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan and Kyrgyzstan to exit the collective security treaty organization and the Eurasian union, and to become part of the islamic world;
- support Turkey in strengthening the economic cooperation organization with Iran and Pakistan to assist Chechnya, Ingushetia, Dagestan, Kabardino-Balkaria, Karachay-Cherkessia, Adygea, Tatarstan, Bashkortostan once these nations obtain freedom and independence from Russia to become part of the islamic cooperation organization.

Egypt is an old ally of the United States of America, which is regretfully unstable in the long term, as the national army of Egypt in a foolish, radical and unnecessary military coup d’etat overthrew freely elected godly learned president of Egypt Mohammed Morsi, putting the national army of Egypt on a collision course with 2/3 of faithful Egyptian muslims who support restoration of the presidential rule of godly learned president of Egypt Mohammed Morsi. Therefore, the United States of America shall support restoration of the presidential rule of godly learned president of Egypt Mohammed Morsi and moral and competent prime-minister of Egypt Hesham Quandil, and shall prepare for a long period of growing civil strife in Egypt, ignited by a foolish, radical and unnecessary military coup d’etat.

Pakistan is an old ally of the United States of America, a great regional power in decline. The United States of America shall support Pakistan in restoration of the legitimate Taliban government in Afghanistan, and in extension of its influence, in association with Afghanistan, over Tajikistan.

Iran is a great regional power, an ancient great nation that for long has been unjustly despised, which is entitled to peaceful development of nuclear power plants and creation of nuclear weapons if Iran wishes so. Yet since Iran declares its unwillingness to develop nuclear weapons, Iran and IAEA shall continue to hold negotiations with regard to the Iranian nuclear program to ascertain its peaceful character until a reasonable solution, acceptable to both parties, is reached. In the interim, US economic sanctions against Iran shall be lifted, while prohibition on arms trade with Iran shall remain in force.

Iran will remain hostile to the United States of America by its tradition of islamic faith, which designated the United States of America as the great satan, yet Iran shall be permitted to discover errors of its religious doctrines by its own deeds, and not attacked militarily. In particular, the USA shall encourage the state of Israel to concern itself with threats to its national defense within its territory limited by the Nile, the Euphrates, borders of Syria, Iraq, Kuwait, Sudan, Saudi Arabia and Egypt. It is important to remember a sad fate of Marcus Crassus, who, incited by jewish usurers, sought to conquer the territory of Iran to enrich himself only to meet his sad fate, and not to repeat errors of the past.

The Russian federation is a main geopolitical enemy of the United States of America, and will remain so as long as it exists. Yet, the Russian federation by its own deeds has become the enemy of Christianity and islam and thereby determined its fate: the Russian federation will fall, will be dissolved by 2017 and will be reassembled as the nation-state of the Russian people, the Russian republic (Rus), re-founded by the Russians, made of the Russians and for the Russians. The United States of America shall encourage dissolution of the Russian federation, in particular the United States of America shall:

-support Japan in its just territorial demands with regard to four Kurili islands, unlawfully occupied by Russia after the 2nd world war, to be returned to Japan;
- support Turkey and the economic cooperation organization in inviting the Central Asian nations of Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan and Kyrgyzstan to exit the collective security treaty organization and the Eurasian union, and to become part of the islamic world;
- support legitimate demands for freedom, sovereignty and independence of the islamic nations of Russia: Chechnya, Ingushetia, Dagestan, Kabardino-Balkaria, Karachay-Cherkessia, Adygea, Tatarstan, Bashkortostan;
- support Turkey and the economic cooperation organization to assist Chechnya, Ingushetia, Dagestan, Kabardino-Balkaria, Karachay-Cherkessia, Adygea, Tatarstan, Bashkortostan once these nations obtain freedom and independence from Russia to become part of the islamic cooperation organization and of the islamic world;
- support Finland in its just territorial demands with regard to the territory of Karelia and the territory of Russia that was a part of Finland in accordance with the treaty of Tartu of 1920 to be returned to Finland;
- support Estonia in its just territorial demands with regard to the territory of Russia that was a part of Estonia in accordance with the treaty of Tartu of 1920 to be returned to Estonia;
- support Latvia and Lithuania in their just territorial demands with regard to the territory of Russia that was a part of Latvia and Lithuania in accordance with the treaty of Riga of 1921 to be returned to Latvia and Lithuania;
- support Poland in its just territorial demands with regard to the territory of Koennigsberg region to be returned to Poland or to be established as a sovereign state under Polish protectorate;
- to achieve agreement with Russia with regard to the division of Arctic continent, giving 1/3 to Russia, 1/3 to USA and Canada and 1/3 to the EU and EFTA;
- to encourage the EU to discontinue the eastern partnership initiative, which provokes an unnecessary conflict between the EU and Russia;
- to encourage the EU not to admit as members Serbia, Montenegro and Macedonia, permitting these nations to walk in their own sovereign ways and respecting Russian interests within these nations;
- to encourage the EU not to unduly hasten the signing of free trade agreement with Ukraine, permitting Ukraine to walk in its own Ukrainian way and respecting Russian interests in Ukraine, while avoiding Ukraine’s accession to the Eurasian union;
- to strengthen trade and economic sanctions against the Belarusian dictatorship, restricting US-Belarus trade by appropriate tariffs and quotas and preventing granting US loans and provision of US investments to Belarus;
- to encourage the EU to strengthen trade and economic sanctions against the Belarusian dictatorship, restricting EU-Belarus trade by appropriate tariffs and quotas and preventing granting EU loans and provision of EU investments to Belarus.

Dissolution of the Russian federation, the collective security treaty organization and the neo-ussr - the Eurasian union - Russia seeks to create, and establishment of the Russian nation-state - the Russian republic (Rus) - is in strategic national interests of the United States of America, as the Russian federation run by the dictatorship will remain a main geopolitical enemy of the United States of America as long as it exists, seeking to re-create the neo-ussr, the Eurasian union, hostile to US interests.

Additionally, US national security agencies need deep restructuring, given recent revelations with regard to their unconstitutional, illegal and even criminal activities.

The Al-Qaeda attacks upon the United States in 2001, which could have been prevented, had US federal agencies acted upon an advance warning given to them by a number of international intelligence agencies, including European intelligence agencies and Israeli mossad, were used as a pretext for the unprecedented and unlawful infringements upon the constitutional rights of American citizens.

First, the infamous patriot act was passed, even though the majority of US representatives and senators did not read it, infringing upon the numerous constitutional rights of American citizens protected in the first 10 amendments to the US constitution. The patriot act has not made the US safe, contrary to the false claims of its supporters in the Bush administration, quite the opposite: violation of the constitutional rights of American citizens has failed to deter numerous terrorist acts and politically-motivated murders carried out within the United States by foreign intelligence agencies, militant groups and international economic, social and ethnic elites, the last of which was the Tsarnaev terrorist attack, which could well have been organized by the Russian-appointed Chechenian warlord kadyrov, who ordered a number of assassinations of the Chechenians to be carried out in Turkey and Europe. It is obvious that the patriot act in its entirety should be swiftly repealed, as it infringes upon numerous constitutional rights of American citizens, protected in the first 10 amendments to the US constitution and has failed to make the United States of America safe.

Second, the department of homeland security was created out of 22 independent agencies that were kept separate for a good reason, which reportedly created an unconstitutional national police force. The department of homeland security has failed to make the United States of America safer as numerous mass shootings throughout the United States indicated, and should be abolished. Some of the federal agencies comprising the department of homeland security, in particular, the infamous ATF that has committed grave crimes against American citizens, should be abolished outright and their activities investigated by US Congress, other federal agencies should regain their independence. The record of zionist ex-head of the department of homeland security michael chertoff should be investigated by an independent congressional prosecutor appointed to determine whether the constitutional rights of the United States citizens suspected of so-called extremism and domestic terrorism - that is, American dissidents - were violated by the department of homeland security employees, issuing the open report to US Congress.

Third, US intelligence and law enforcement agencies routinely violate the US constitution, conspiring with foreign intelligence and law enforcement agencies to violate the constitutional rights of US citizens, and natural rights and derivative-natural rights of foreign citizens, endangering the constitutionally protected rights and freedoms of US citizens and the republican constitutional order of the United States of America.

In particular, the CIA ran illegal torture, kidnapping and rendition operations in a number of European, Latin American, Middle Eastern and African countries, kidnapping, torturing and murdering thousands of foreign citizens. Torture is a cruel and unusual punishment, prohibited by the US constitution, and kidnapping, slavery and murder are capital federal crimes in the United States, punished by a death penalty in all cases. US Congress should appoint an independent congressional prosecutor to thoroughly clean the CIA, to compile, present to Congress and disseminate to the American people the report of CIA illegal activities, in particular, torture, kidnapping and rendition operations, and at least to dismiss from US government positions all CIA operatives involved in torture, kidnapping and rendition operations. The fact that other intelligence agencies do so should not lower US constitutional standards, in particular, prohibition of torture, kidnapping and murder of those who did not commit the abominable deeds of sexual perversions (homosexuality, lesbianism, bestiality, incest, pedophilia (sexual relations with girls below 12 years of age)), abominations (child murders (abortions), change of gender, cannibalism, human cloning), intentional murder, enslavement of men/women or selling of men/women to slavery.

The NSA as it is spectacularly reported is engaging in fishing expeditions, recording and analyzing all internet traffic and phone messages throughout the United States, and reportedly compiling the extended databases on US and foreign citizens, permitting to arbitrarily and without due process of law deny and extend certain privileges and rights to them – the activities that are prohibited in the fourth amendment to the US constitution. Recording and analyzing internet traffic and phone messages is permitted solely subject to a court order issued upon a probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized - that is, with regard to particular persons and places for federal felony investigations by the FBI or foreign intelligence purposes by the NSA. The situation in the NSA is particularly dangerous, since the extended databases on US and foreign citizens it has compiled permit to target US citizens for unlawful prosecution or assassination, and even create a totalitarian surveillance state in the USA, not dissimilar to the one described in chapter 13 of the Book of Revelation.

There are also unconfirmed reports of murders of technical and IT specialists and whistleblowers, in particular, in Europe, who reported to their peoples and the American people the dangers of the constitutionally prohibited activities in which the NSA routinely engages, or refused to take part in such activities. The case of Mr. Snowden, who decided to report to the American people in a spectacular manner the violations of constitutionally protected rights by the NSA, will hopefully have a positive ending.

Mr. Snowden is of course not a fugitive from justice, as political crimes as espionage, incitement of hatred, incitement to violence or terrorism, insider trading, extremism, etc., are not common crimes that can be pursued internationally, but criminalized conduct specific to a particular nation, which a nation can pursue solely with regard to its citizens who voluntarily accepted citizenship of a nation in national courts, while justice refers to the acts criminal in nature, which all civilized nations have regarded in the past and still regard as criminal, i.e., intentional murder, rape, physical assault, kidnapping, slavery, piracy, etc. Regretfully, in modern world some try to make political crimes into common crimes, which is not possible, simply because what is espionage or incitement in one country may not be regarded as espionage and incitement in another country, and do not refer to the conduct condemned internationally, even if some wish to condemn such conduct internationally, but refer to the conduct which some nations may tolerate reasonably or even justify in particular political circumstances. Similarly, the fact that Mr. Snowden may have cooperated with foreign intelligence agencies as some suggest, and his strange desire to seek a refuge with the Russian dictatorship, which monitors the behavior of its citizens and violates their natural rights, derivative-natural rights, and civil rights in a far greater degree than the federal government of the United States, does not change the fact that he reports genuine violations of the constitutional rights of US citizens by the NSA. Thus, if Mr. Snowden returns to the US, he may face trial for espionage, if he indeed is a foreign spy, but the United States of America cannot demand his extradition, as he is not a fugitive from justice, but a genuine American dissident, unhappy with what any reasonable man may objectively regard as systemic violations of the constitutional rights of US citizens by a US federal agency.

A reasonable solution will be for Venezuela to grant Mr. Snowden permanent residence and issue an appropriate permanent residence permit in accordance with the wishes of its venerated diseased president, Hugo Chavez, and to book a charter flight for Mr. Snowden to fly to Venezuela, avoiding the territory of the USA, Canada and the EU and EFTA nations. If this happens, there shall be no conspiracies to prevent Mr. Snowden from traveling to his new homeland as with diversion of the plane of the Bolivian president Evo Morales, which is not acceptable and only fuels anti-Americanism and Euroscepticism in America. Regretfully, the Greek technicians murdered by MI6, who threatened to reveal the system of monitoring of cell phones in Greece by the NSA and European intelligence agencies, were not as fortunate as Mr. Snowden.

More importantly, US Congress shall hold a congressional hearing on the NSA, and develop a bill to restrain its activities in accordance with the provisions of the fourth amendment to the US constitution and destroy the extensive NSA databases on US citizens and foreign citizens who are not persons of interest in foreign intelligence gathering activities, and see that this bill is actually implemented in the NSA. NSA fishing expeditions should end because they are very dangerous to the constitutional rights of US citizens and the US republican system of government. There are reportedly ties to mossad-affiliated businesses in the NSA: these ties should end.

The FBI is reportedly regularly conspiring with foreign law enforcement agencies to entrap US citizens, entice US citizens into the EU nations to have them imprisoned or murdered by European law enforcement or intelligence agencies in violation of their constitutional rights. Especially pronounced such criminal activities of the FBI have become under its ex-head Robert Mueller. A case in point is the story of Mr. Gary Lauck, an American national-socialist, whose travel plans were reported by the FBI to the EU nations that arrested him and tried him essentially for his national-socialist beliefs, constitutionally protected in the United States, sentencing him to four years in prison, and the government of the United States failed to protest the unlawful and groundless sentence with regard to the US citizen whose constitutional rights the government of the United States is obliged to protect by law whether in the United States or abroad. It is obvious that the FBI reporting of Mr. Gary Lauck’s travel plans to the EU nations constitutes violation of US law and abuse of power of the US federal government, for which criminal charges with regard to those responsible may be warranted. However reprehensible Mr. Gary Lauck’s view may be, he is entitled to the protection of US law and the US diplomatic service, and respect of his constitutional rights by the US government, especially given that the EU nations could have refused him entry to their territory if unwilling to tolerate his activities on their territory.

The FBI is engaged in a number of unwarranted investigations of legitimate US civil associations and churches, reportedly upon pressure by zionist, jewish and Israeli groups, i.e., groundlessly classifying the national alliance - a US civil association founded by a doctor of physics - as a terrorist group, because of some violent acts committed by the former members of the national alliance, over whom the national alliance had no control or oversight. As a result, trumpeted charges were issued with regard to US citizen Chester Doles, a national alliance activist, and he was imprisoned essentially for his constitutionally protected political views. A church called Aryan nations, established by a reputable US citizen and a famous inventor Richard Butler, is regularly called a terrorist organization because its members hold to constitutionally protected White separatist views. Finally, the pastor of another religious group called Creativity church, and a lawyer by training, Matthew Hale, was unlawfully and groundlessly sentenced to 40-year imprisonment, allegedly for conspiring to kill a federal judge, although no evidence of such criminal conspiracy whatsoever was presented at his jury trial, and the whole case was based on surmises by a federal informant seeking to entrap Matthew Hale, while Matthew Hale specifically denied participation in this criminal conspiracy. However repugnant are his views, Mr. Hale is entitled to his constitutional rights, including the right to a jury of his peers, which, as he truthfully claimed, was denied to him, and to have his guilt to be proven beyond reasonable doubt by objective and compelling physical evidence, which was not at all presented at his trial. Therefore, Matthew Hale should be swiftly released from prison, apologized to, and compensated for each month of unlawful imprisonment, essentially for his constitutionally protected political and religious views.

It is obvious that under Mr. Mueller’s administration the FBI has strayed from its mission and abused its power, failing to prevent two terrorist attacks: that of September 11, 2001, which was preventable, should the warnings of foreign intelligence agencies have been regarded, and the Boston bombing, which was likely an act of Russian-imposed Chechenian warlord kadyrov, unhappy that his human rights abuses provoke wide outrage in America, who carried out a string of assassinations of his political opponents in European and islamic nations, and which was not preventable as the FBI currently lacks the capacity to stem terrorist attacks carried out by foreign states inside the United States. The FBI record under Mr. Mueller’s administration should be investigated by an independent prosecutor appointed by US Congress, the report of any illegal practices and activities uncovered compiled and reported to US Congress and the American people, and criminal charges against Mr. Mueller filed, if evidence of conspiracy with foreign states to violate the constitutionally protected rights of the Americans is uncovered. The US churches and civil associations classified by the FBI as terrorist groups because of the acts of former members over whom such churches and civil associations exercise no control, should be stricken off the list of terrorist groups, and cooperation with jewish, zionist, Israeli and other civil rights organizations limited solely to alleged federal felonies. The list of federal felony crimes should be reviewed and significantly reduced by US Congress, the so-called hate crime law repealed by US Congress in view of unequal application of justice, since in their nature all crimes are hate crimes, and each crime of the same kind should warrant equal punishment to all criminals. FBI cooperation with foreign law enforcement agencies should be significantly reduced and limited to the criminal acts criminal in nature and recognized as crimes worldwide as intentional murder, rape, physical assault, kidnapping, slavery, piracy, etc., and there shall be no permanent FBI presence overseas besides presence mandated by specific investigation, temporary in nature, as such presence tends to lead to collaboration that often violates the constitutionally protected rights of US citizens.

It is important to precisely define what are terrorism, militancy and extremism, and to delimit zones of responsibility of the CIA, the NSA and the FBI.

Terrorism is murder of civilian population for no objective reason as the Boston bombing carried out by the Tsarnaev brothers. Terrorism acts are few in number, carried out by completely wicked and deranged individuals, with whom negotiations are useless. In dealing with terrorists the proper approach is to kill them if they resist capture, or, if captured and responsible for murder of two or more civilians, to swiftly judge them, sentence to death and execute them. It is important for US Congress to consider establishing the federal crime of terrorism - murder of two or more civilian US citizens or residents for no objective reason - punished by an automatic death penalty. Terrorists, however, should not be tortured: prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment, including torture - that is, infliction of physical force or physical pain to extract confession - extends to all persons in US custody whether inside the United States of America or overseas.

Terrorist acts inside the US are sole responsibility of the FBI, terrorist acts against US citizens overseas is sole responsibility of the CIA. Destruction of US property, if no loss of life is involved, even if done by blasts, is not an act of terrorism. Foreign terrorists outside the United States and terrorists, who are US citizens, outside the United States, if such cannot be captured, may be killed by drone attacks, authorized by the secretary of defense in association with the director of the CIA in accordance with due process of law proper in such cases. Terrorists inside the United States should normally be arrested and tried in US civil courts, and only when their capture is impossible, or they utterly refuse to surrender can be killed by commanders of the units authorized to capture them.

Militancy/insurgency is more commonplace. A militant/insurgent is a person who has objective grievances, acceptable as such to a reasonable man, against the government of the nation the citizen of which he is, which the government of such a nation refuses to address, and raises arms in support of his cause. A militant detained by the US government overseas or inside the United States is always subject to protections of the Geneva convention relative to the protection of civilian persons in time of war. It is possible to negotiate a reasonable peace agreement with militants and often, when their legitimate grievances are resolved, militants eventually return to civilian life. The militants who attack US citizens inside the United States or abroad are sole responsibility of the US department of defense that should try the militants arrested outside the United States, whether US citizens or not, in US military courts for war crimes or genocide committed by them, or detain them for the duration of hostilities not exceeding seven years, and release them thereafter if no war crimes or genocide are committed by them. Militants arrested inside the United States in times of peace should be tried in US civil courts in accordance with US law.

Foreign militants outside the United States and militants, who are US citizens, outside the United States, if such cannot be captured, may be killed by drone attacks authorized by the secretary of defense in accordance with due process of law proper in such cases. Militants inside the United States should normally be arrested and tried in US civil courts, and only when their capture is impossible or they utterly refuse to surrender can be killed by commanders of the units authorized to capture them. All militants who committed no war crimes, killed by the US military, should be buried with military honors as any other killed foreign soldiers.

A good example of a US militant, and not terrorist as many claimed, is Timothy McVeigh, who correctly perceived his actions as vengeance against the murder of the US citizens belonging to the church branch of David in Waco, TX. While the branch of David was a sect with a strange and immoral lifestyle, it did not warrant the use of the US military and the burning alive of the US citizens and their children ordered by the democratic US president clinton. Hence Timothy McVeigh was properly convicted in federal courts, sentenced to death and executed, yet he should have been shot rather than put to death by a lethal injection, and buried with military honors as any other US militant, including John Brown.

A good example of foreign militant organization is Ansar-Al-Sharia, which seeks liberation of islamic nations from foreign troops and oppressive dictatorships and creation of islamic states in islamic nations.
fdtwain is offline  
Reply

  Defending The Truth Political Forum > Political Issues > Money and Finance > Economics

Tags
american, defending, freedom



Search tags for this page
Click on a term to search for related topics.
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Will Native American Religious Freedom Count As Much As Hobby Lobby's? skews13 Current Events 13 July 27th, 2015 06:05 AM
If burning the American Flag is considered Freedom of Speech, FOXNEWS Current Events 64 December 30th, 2013 05:35 AM
A New Birth of American Freedom sumara Current Events 9 July 8th, 2013 11:44 AM
Government Freedom Cartoon: "Make Mine Freedom" Dude111 Political Talk 0 November 29th, 2010 09:39 PM


Facebook Twitter RSS Feed



Copyright © 2005-2013 Defending The Truth. All rights reserved.