September 5th, 2016, 10:37 AM  #11  
Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Cliffside Park, NJ
Posts: 395
 Quote:
Such common cores better enable us to compare the consequences of different teaching methods and the achievements of different school administrations. In the case of the link Sabcat provided within this thread’s initial post, I agree with the premise that appreciating and understanding the logical reasoning underlying arithmetic is as important or possibly more important than the ability to arrive at the correct answers. The most elementary calculators can provide the correct arithmetic answers but they’re useless to those that do not understand why and how to employ them to solve real problems. There’s much to be gained by the exchange and publishing different methods of teaching a subject and comparing the consequences of those methods. Hopefully schoola' less qualified school administrators and their government overseers will be forced to face and explain their shortcomings to the voters and taxpayers. It appears to me that you and I share serious doubts as to the value of enforcing standardized instruction methods, but that does not negate what I believe to be the value of a “common core” standard to measure students’ achievement with regard to the study of their subject. Respectfully, Supposn Last edited by Supposn; September 5th, 2016 at 10:39 AM.  
 
September 5th, 2016, 11:21 AM  #12  
Have you seen my Iguana Join Date: Dec 2013 Location: Earth
Posts: 22,967
 Quote:
 
September 5th, 2016, 12:28 PM  #13  
Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Cliffside Park, NJ
Posts: 395
 Quote:
I suppose your reference to danger is not physical danger and in this case I prefer the word "poor" rather than "regressive". What precisely did you mean when you wrote "The mechanics of this common core mathematics was the focus of class that it was a means to an end"? Respectfully, Supposn  
September 5th, 2016, 06:46 PM  #14  
Have you seen my Iguana Join Date: Dec 2013 Location: Earth
Posts: 22,967
 Quote:
How to Multiply Using the Line Method: 14 Steps this was what they were teaching my kids not as an alternative or an additional system. they were replacing numbers. they had already learned basic mathematics at home. they understood the concept. this is why i used the word regressive. Quote:
i understand the reasoning to attempt to help children grasp the concept of "numbers" but the goal of this exercise should be for the student to ultimately replace the "dots and lines" w/ numbers not to stunt the entire class by learning a foreign system. i had to learn this shit just to decipher their homework. ridiculous. Quote:
 
September 5th, 2016, 10:53 PM  #15 
Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2015 Location: Brown Township, Ohio
Posts: 10,858

Grade school teachers should only use add, subtract. multiply and divide using pencil and paper and the blackboard and chalk using rote to teach math. The young brain that is maturing gets the basics locked in that they never forget. Knowing basic math makes the move to high math an easy move with a tiny bit of tutoring.

September 6th, 2016, 06:29 AM  #16  
Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Cliffside Park, NJ
Posts: 395
 Quote:
”The mechanics of this common core mathematics was the focus of class that it was a means to an end” and your rewritten correction, “The mechanics of this common core mathematics was the focus of class that NOT it was a means to an end” are both unclear to me. I’m supposing that if those sentences were read by many others, most would also find them to be unclear;(but my supposition could be wrong). Do you mean the teaching method applied by this common core mathematics was to promote a political rather than a mathematical concept? Do you consider that the common core is promoting a concept regarding different classifications of people? Respectfully Supposn Last edited by Supposn; September 6th, 2016 at 06:36 AM.  
September 6th, 2016, 08:46 AM  #17  
Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Cliffside Park, NJ
Posts: 395
 Quote:
http://www.wikihow.com/MultiplyUsingtheLineMethod and Some of MY OWN opinions regarding the instruction of children: (1) After first introducing children to numbers using their fingers, we should continue with simple addition of numbers using their fingers. That’s the conventional method that most children are introduced to arithmetic and it works fine. (2) I agree as the Wikipedia article explains that that children should be taught the concept of “place” position determining the value of each digit within a written number. But this segment of instruction should not begin until the children can write digits, and add single digit numbers using pencils and paper. It should begin BEFORE the children begin doing subtraction. Due to an additional step being required subtraction of numbers when we subtract a larger digit subtrahend from a smaller digit minuend, the concept of each of a number’s digits’ incremental values being determined by its placement within the number should begin prior to teaching subtraction or any other arithmetic operation other than addition. (3) Now we can introduce the concept of a few things or extremely large numbers of things. How many peas on your plate or on your spoon? How many grains of rice in your bowl or in the entire sack? How many grains of sand on the beach? These three concepts should be THE very first mathematical concepts That should be taught. Respectfully, Supposn  
September 6th, 2016, 09:26 AM  #18  
Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2013 Location: Between everywhere
Posts: 26,851
 Quote:
Tris, you said "No country with high statistics for academic scores use common core as a teaching method." When I first ran into a controversy about common core I did some investigating. Common core is not a teaching method. Their official website specifically states that the system has no curriculum it advances, it has no mandated or even suggested text books. It is a set of expectations, a set of desired outcomes for children at certain stages of their education. They say that at the end of grade X, kids should know Z. Other than teachers not wanting to be judged for competence, what's the problem? Plus the organization makes it plain that they are looking more for relative improvement than for absolute results, so again what is the problem? If you are a decent teacher I think you should relish the chance to show it.  
September 6th, 2016, 09:29 AM  #19  
Have you seen my Iguana Join Date: Dec 2013 Location: Earth
Posts: 22,967
 Quote:
as in learning the method of "dots and lines" was the goal of the classes not using the concept as a way to find the solution. the following year after i removed my kids from that school the "dots and lines" method was also presented along w/ other basic mathematical concepts. the teachers encouraged the children to move at their own pace and explore different methods. problem solving not regurgitation. this also was not limited to mathematics but was the general theme of the school.  
September 6th, 2016, 10:14 AM  #20  
Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2015 Location: Arizona
Posts: 7,589
 Quote:
Thank you, RNG. I was just about to jump in. Let's make sure we understand WHAT Common Core is. You are correct. Common Core are standards. They are benchmarks which indicate what students are expected to learn at each grade level. Common Core is NOT lesson plans. NOT curriculum. NOT a teaching method. Common Core standards were created for two areas: Math and English. I can't stress this enough: While the standards set gradespecific goals, they do not define how the standards should be taught or which materials should be used to support students. So when parents blame Common Core for the weird Math or the goofy worksheets, they are not understanding the process. No Child Left Behind (GW Bush) was the precursor to Common Core.  

Tags 
common, core, kids, react 
Thread Tools  
Display Modes  

Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Common Core?  roastpork  Education  11  August 24th, 2015 12:26 PM 
common core  webguy4  Education  26  April 3rd, 2015 09:35 AM 
Common core idiotic  azchurchmouse  Education  49  May 21st, 2014 09:49 AM 
Common Core Explained (So, Even 'Baggers Understand)  Medicine Man  Current Events  10  April 23rd, 2014 11:08 AM 
Another Shitcago Common Core graduate.  pana8  Current Events  1  January 17th, 2014 06:21 AM 