Political Forums  

Go Back   Defending The Truth Political Forum > Political Issues > Environment

Environment Environmental Politics Forum - Environmental issues, global warming, pollution, and proposals


Thanks Tree103Thanks
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old January 4th, 2017, 12:44 PM   #71
forgot my old user name
 
right to left's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,374
Quote:
Originally Posted by roastpork View Post
I agree but you seem to think that all R. Wingers are denying climate change, you, as usual, assume too much. All intelligent R. Ws' realize climate change is taking place always has and always will; and it's obvious that humans have played a part in the present warming trend; however a pragmatic approach is what we propose, not an immediate return to the stone age.
But, I have the same question I have for liberals on climate change: what are you going to do about it?
My big problem with high profile liberals on this issue is, after their proposals are examined, they do little or nothing to stop the increase in GHG emissions. The rightwing approach is usually to deny the problem or advise doing nothing about it.
right to left is offline  
Old January 4th, 2017, 12:52 PM   #72
Banned
 
coke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: nunya
Posts: 12,580
Here is my question. What happens if the ice caps melt
Thanks from right to left
coke is offline  
Old January 4th, 2017, 01:30 PM   #73
Senior Member
 
justoneman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: chicago
Posts: 2,432
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daws77 View Post
Fossil fuels are the stone age.
There is no technological reason to phase out fossil fuels as fast as possible.
Most RW's would be for it if they could make money on it and spend none on it simultaneously.
What is stone age is the chevy volt and the tesla car. They are powered by coal.
justoneman is offline  
Old January 4th, 2017, 02:27 PM   #74
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Lehigh Valley Pa.,USA
Posts: 6,513
Quote:
Originally Posted by right to left View Post
But, I have the same question I have for liberals on climate change: what are you going to do about it?
My big problem with high profile liberals on this issue is, after their proposals are examined, they do little or nothing to stop the increase in GHG emissions. The rightwing approach is usually to deny the problem or advise doing nothing about it.
Close assessment.....The LW does not want to acknowledge the answer to the problem....That is.....There are 7.5 Billion people on the planet today, that is projected to be 8 billion by 2025 and 9 billion by 2040....more people equals more needed energy and resorces...more energy and resources equals more GHG....The only logical solution is to reduce the population....

The RW sees the LW trying to avoid that solution by redistributing the wealth from the advanced industrial nations to the less developed 3rd world...By regressing the standard of living they (LW) figure that even with growing population, the overall demand for energy and resources will be reduced....The RW figures, leave it alone and nature will thin the herd out just like it does with any species that over-extends its range....See...It's simple..
Jimgorn is offline  
Old January 4th, 2017, 03:19 PM   #75
Banned
 
Daws77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: California
Posts: 7,543
Quote:
Originally Posted by justoneman View Post
What is stone age is the chevy volt and the tesla car. They are powered by coal.
Ah no .
God damn you're ignorant.
Petroleum (oil) is the liquid for of coal.
Both are fossil fuels.
And 5he largest polluters and contributors to climate change.
Major fucking fail

Btw
What batteries do Tesla use?
The battery itself contains 7,104 lithium-ion battery cells. Here's what's in each cell: Cathode: The Tesla Model S battery cathode uses an NCA formulation with the approximate ratio: 80% nickel, 15% cobalt, and 5% aluminum. Small amounts of lithium are also used in the cathode.
The Extraordinary Raw Materials in a Tesla Model S - Visual Capitalist
Visual Capitalist extraordinary...
Feedback
About this result
MORE RESULTS
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chevrolet_Volt

Asshat.
Daws77 is offline  
Old January 4th, 2017, 03:20 PM   #76
Banned
 
Daws77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: California
Posts: 7,543
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimgorn View Post
Close assessment.....The LW does not want to acknowledge the answer to the problem....That is.....There are 7.5 Billion people on the planet today, that is projected to be 8 billion by 2025 and 9 billion by 2040....more people equals more needed energy and resorces...more energy and resources equals more GHG....The only logical solution is to reduce the population....

The RW sees the LW trying to avoid that solution by redistributing the wealth from the advanced industrial nations to the less developed 3rd world...By regressing the standard of living they (LW) figure that even with growing population, the overall demand for energy and resources will be reduced....The RW figures, leave it alone and nature will thin the herd out just like it does with any species that over-extends its range....See...It's simple..
Nice deflection.
Daws77 is offline  
Old January 4th, 2017, 03:26 PM   #77
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Lehigh Valley Pa.,USA
Posts: 6,513
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daws77 View Post
Nice deflection.
Do you have anything intelligent to say??...Why is that a deflection??
Jimgorn is offline  
Old January 4th, 2017, 03:43 PM   #78
Banned
 
Daws77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: California
Posts: 7,543
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimgorn View Post
Close assessment.....The LW does not want to acknowledge the answer to the problem....That is.....There are 7.5 Billion people on the planet today, that is projected to be 8 billion by 2025 and 9 billion by 2040....more people equals more needed energy and resorces...more energy and resources equals more GHG....The only logical solution is to reduce the population....

The RW sees the LW trying to avoid that solution by redistributing the wealth from the advanced industrial nations to the less developed 3rd world...By regressing the standard of living they (LW) figure that even with growing population, the overall demand for energy and resources will be reduced....The RW figures, leave it alone and nature will thin the herd out just like it does with any species that over-extends its range....See...It's simple..
it has zero relevance to the subject just as your obsession with Fabian socialists has on the other thread.
Daws77 is offline  
Old January 4th, 2017, 03:45 PM   #79
Banned
 
Daws77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: California
Posts: 7,543
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimgorn View Post
Do you have anything intelligent to say??...Why is that a deflection??
I always have something intelligent to say, as I've said many time before you're too dim to understand it.
Daws77 is offline  
Old January 4th, 2017, 04:01 PM   #80
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Lehigh Valley Pa.,USA
Posts: 6,513
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daws77 View Post
I always have something intelligent to say, as I've said many time before you're too dim to understand it.
Thought so....You can't explain your silly posts....the mark of a troll...
Jimgorn is offline  
Reply

  Defending The Truth Political Forum > Political Issues > Environment

Tags
change, climate, republicans



Search tags for this page
Click on a term to search for related topics.
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Here's All The Nonsense 2016 Republicans Have Spouted About Climate Change LongWinded Current Events 10 December 3rd, 2015 01:38 AM
Republicans React to Climate Change Report With Denial and Hatred klaatu Current Events 9 August 9th, 2014 06:35 PM
Murdoch on climate change. roastpork Environment 11 July 24th, 2014 06:00 AM
The LIABILITY, for climate change: bobgnote Environment 34 December 26th, 2013 04:00 AM
fixing climate change webguy4 Environment 31 May 17th, 2013 02:01 AM


Facebook Twitter RSS Feed



Copyright © 2005-2013 Defending The Truth. All rights reserved.