Political Forums  

Go Back   Defending The Truth Political Forum > Political Issues > Environment

Environment Environmental Politics Forum - Environmental issues, global warming, pollution, and proposals


Thanks Tree49Thanks
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old September 11th, 2017, 07:26 PM   #41
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Upside Down
Posts: 146
Quote:
Originally Posted by imaginethat View Post
That's a self-indictment.

Of you? Otherwise it is a non sequitur.
Hashtag is offline  
Old September 11th, 2017, 08:11 PM   #42
Senior Member
 
imaginethat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Western Slope, Colorado
Posts: 54,664
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hashtag View Post
I guess this Nwolfe is an evangelical atheist.

So there's one here who has no belief in God but does have religion called AGW. Bet there are others too. Those who claim no belief in God always latch onto something.
Please define "God" as you use the term.
imaginethat is offline  
Old September 11th, 2017, 08:12 PM   #43
Senior Member
 
imaginethat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Western Slope, Colorado
Posts: 54,664
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hashtag View Post
Of you? Otherwise it is a non sequitur.
You are soooo cute.
imaginethat is offline  
Old September 11th, 2017, 08:28 PM   #44
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: California
Posts: 117
Quote:
Originally Posted by justoneman View Post
Your side is the anti science crowd.
Your delusions and cultic myths are very hilarious and totally absurd, you poor bewildered reality denier. Pretty near the entire world scientific community is part of our "crowd"......AKA the sane and rational majority of the population who understand science and accept the scientifically confirmed reality of human caused global warming and its consequent climate changes.

You AGW deniers who are stooging for the fossil fuel industry are the modern equivalent of the anti-science Flat Earth Society wackos.

Scientific opinion on climate change
Wikipedia - the Free Encyclopedia

The scientific consensus is that the Earth's climate system is unequivocally warming, and that it is extremely likely (meaning 95% probability or higher) that this warming is predominantly caused by humans. It is likely that this mainly arises from increased concentrations of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, such as from deforestation and the burning of fossil fuels, partially offset by human caused increases in aerosols; natural changes had little effect.

National and international science academies and scientific societies have assessed current scientific opinion on global warming. These assessments are generally consistent with the conclusions of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

No scientific body of national or international standing maintains a formal opinion dissenting from any of these main points. The last national or international scientific body to drop dissent was the American Association of Petroleum Geologists, which in 2000 updated its statement to its current non-committal position.







Quote:
Originally Posted by justoneman View Post
You all do not believe in putting forth the original data for peer review. Your side just tries to "bark" down real science.
Your cultic myths are truly insane!

The original data for every peer-reviewed study of the climate and the observed global warming is, in fact, totally available. You have been lied to about that point, as well as about many other things, by your fossil fuel industry puppet-masters. Too bad you are so pathetically gullible and so completely ignorant about science. You cultic dingbats wouldn't know "real science" if it bit you.
Ahgho Boogheroff is online now  
Old September 11th, 2017, 08:47 PM   #45
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Lehigh Valley Pa.,USA
Posts: 6,633
So this ahgo boogeroff new guy comes on here and starts calling everyone who questions the man-made/climate change/global warming boondoogle names, and then expects some sort of respect......Sounds like Daws to me...
Thanks from Sabcat
Jimgorn is offline  
Old September 11th, 2017, 09:47 PM   #46
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Upside Down
Posts: 146
Quote:
Originally Posted by imaginethat View Post
Please define "God" as you use the term.

Yeah, I was right. Another who has AGW as his/her god. How many more on this board do not believe in God but have as their faith AGW? Two as of now.


Quote:
Originally Posted by imaginethat View Post
You are soooo cute.

You've seen my baby pictures!
Hashtag is offline  
Old September 11th, 2017, 11:07 PM   #47
Senior Member
 
imaginethat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Western Slope, Colorado
Posts: 54,664
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hashtag View Post
Yeah, I was right. Another who has AGW as his/her god. How many more on this board do not believe in God but have as their faith AGW? Two as of now.

You've seen my baby pictures!
No, but I'm looking at your juvenile mind that really believes, and has really believed, that the definition of God you accept is "the" right one, and therefore you and your opinions are better, more correct, than anyone who doesn't agree with the definition of God you've accepted.

Please define God so I can answer your question.
imaginethat is offline  
Old September 12th, 2017, 01:28 AM   #48
Senior Member
 
Nwolfe35's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
Posts: 14,587
Quote:
Originally Posted by justoneman View Post
Your side is the anti science crowd. You all do not believe in putting forth the original data for peer review. Your side just tries to "bark" down real science.
The data has been put out for peer review. That is the reason the vast majority of people in the science fields agree.

You're just accepting what the RW propaganda machine tells you.
Nwolfe35 is offline  
Old September 12th, 2017, 03:11 AM   #49
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: massachusetts
Posts: 8,634
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hashtag View Post
It s the cult of AGW. No doubt many of the followers of the AGW cult that post on boards have no faith in God, but instead have adopted AGW as their faith. It is, in fact, a religion to many.

I wonder who among the cult on this board are also believers in God?
I see you link the rejection of science to the belief in an imaginary being.

Here we are in the 21st century, and you proudly display the mindset of the Dark Ages.

Like some ancient priest, sacrificing humans on an altar of some variety of imagined being, in order to feel superior.

A pathetic primitive buffoon, that is what you are, that is how your children and grandchildren will come to see you, your proud beliefs will be seen as so much nonsense, that's derisive laughter you hear, it's how the future greets the memory of you.
Thanks from RNG
goober is offline  
Old September 12th, 2017, 04:04 AM   #50
Senior Member
 
Twisted Sister's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Brown Township, Ohio
Posts: 10,459
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hashtag View Post
Of you? Otherwise it is a non sequitur.
Did you mean to write self-incriminating?
Twisted Sister is offline  
Reply

  Defending The Truth Political Forum > Political Issues > Environment

Tags
nasa, storms, stronger



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Sham Of Austerity And The Storms To Come skews13 Americas 6 April 11th, 2016 07:27 AM
Saturn's Storms. roastpork Science and Technology 1 April 15th, 2015 05:50 PM
Ted Cruz, Longtime Foe Of NASA And Science, Will Oversee NASA And Science In New Cong LongWinded Current Events 7 January 13th, 2015 11:12 AM
Nearly 100 Dead After Mexico Storms intangible child Current Events 0 September 20th, 2013 11:47 AM


Facebook Twitter RSS Feed



Copyright © 2005-2013 Defending The Truth. All rights reserved.