Political Forums  

Go Back   Defending The Truth Political Forum > Political Issues > Civil Rights > Gay and Lesbian Rights

Gay and Lesbian Rights Gay and Lesbian Political Rights Forum - For topics and discussions about LGBT


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old August 26th, 2011, 03:04 PM   #1
Banned
 
Ray Kaye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: With God....of course!
Posts: 3,095
Rep. Michele Bachmann has dismissed questions about same-sex marriage by national reporters as "frivolous," but during a town hall with primary voters in South Carolina on Thursday she portrayed her views on the issue as a major factor in whether she could be elected president.



The event was moderated by Republican congressman Tim Scott, who said he had a question from a man in the audience. "This question has been asked by several people and the question has to do with the defense of marriage," he warned.



Instead of refusing to answer by saying she's "running for the presidency of the United States" and implying the issue doesn't matter (as she did repeatedly during a recent string of Sunday interviews, including one on Meet the Press), Bachmann described a stand against gay marriage as critical to the success of Republicans.



"In our coalition we have fiscal conservatives, national security conservatives, the Tea Party movement, and we have social conservatives,"" she said. "You put that team together and there's no way that we can possibly lose the election in 2012. We need to stick together."



Bachmann even touted her time as a Minnesota state lawmaker when she introduced a bill to put a gay marriage ban up to a statewide vote. She said her bill, which failed at the time, was inspired by what she saw happen in Massachusetts when the state Supreme Court intervened and same-sex marriage eventually became legal.



"When that happened, I knew that my home state of Minnesota could be next," she said. "Minnesota and Massachusetts have a lot in common. And I was very concerned about that. And so I introduced a bill that would allow the people of Minnesota to define marriage as one man and one woman. In my home state, I was not exactly popular for doing that measure. But I felt that it was right to let the people of Minnesota decide on the definition of marriage, not a plurality of judges."



She wasn't shy about overstating the issue's importance.



"I think that this is such a fundamental issue, this issue of marriage, that I think it's one the people have to vote on," she said.



Bachmann concluded her answer by railing against activist judges and reiterating her support for amending the U.S. Constitution to ban same-sex marriage.



*** Someone needs to explain how civil rights and votes work.



????
Ray Kaye is offline  
Old August 27th, 2011, 06:15 AM   #2
Senior Member
 
PaperAlchemist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,433
This is a woman who hired a known convicted terrorist who advocates for the arrest and genocidal murder of a country's LGBT community. Her not understanding civil rights and the Constitution, is not much of a surprise after such stupidity.
PaperAlchemist is offline  
Old August 27th, 2011, 07:55 AM   #3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 8,333
The question the voters of Minnesota should be asked is whether Michele Bachmann should have been allowed to marry a gay man.
skrekk is offline  
Old August 27th, 2011, 08:01 AM   #4
Retired
 
highway80west's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 17,105
Quote:
Originally Posted by skrekk View Post
The question the voters of Minnesota should be asked is whether Michele Bachmann should have been allowed to marry a gay man.


highway80west is offline  
Old August 27th, 2011, 11:48 AM   #5
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1
She has no apparent understanding of the Constitution, viewing it as something to be frivolously amended to coincide with Christianity. She claims Obama is a dictator, but if she were to become president, she would be. Obama is intellectual, open-minded, and one of the classiest presidents we've had since JFK. Bachmann is a religious fanatic, hoping to ethnically cleanse America by making everyone follow dumbass Christian rules. She would be the dictator here.
robotsinorbit is offline  
Old August 27th, 2011, 12:10 PM   #6
Banned
 
garysher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 34,677
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ray Kaye View Post
*** Someone needs to explain how civil rights and votes work.



????




Ray why don't YOU try to explain that?
garysher is offline  
Old August 27th, 2011, 03:27 PM   #7
Senior Member
 
tristanrobin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: New Haven, CT
Posts: 22,034
Quote:
Originally Posted by gary View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ray Kaye' timestamp='1314399894' post='349992



*** Someone needs to explain how civil rights and votes work.



????




Ray why don't YOU try to explain that?


why don't you ESAD
tristanrobin is offline  
Old August 28th, 2011, 10:56 AM   #8
Senior Member
 
PaperAlchemist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,433
Quote:
Originally Posted by robotsinorbit View Post
She has no apparent understanding of the Constitution, viewing it as something to be frivolously amended to coincide with Christianity. She claims Obama is a dictator, but if she were to become president, she would be. Obama is intellectual, open-minded, and one of the classiest presidents we've had since JFK. Bachmann is a religious fanatic, hoping to ethnically cleanse America by making everyone follow dumbass Christian rules. She would be the dictator here.


JFK. We need another one like that one. Ever since Nixon took office, we've been on a downhill slide.
PaperAlchemist is offline  
Old August 28th, 2011, 11:08 AM   #9
Banned
 
Ray Kaye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: With God....of course!
Posts: 3,095
Quote:
Originally Posted by tristanrobin View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by gary' timestamp='1314475834' post='350207

[quote name='Ray Kaye' timestamp='1314399894' post='349992']



*** Someone needs to explain how civil rights and votes work.



????




Ray why don't YOU try to explain that?


why don't you ESAD

[/quote]



*** ESAD, exactly.



I don't know why I, or anyone else should explain it to the fool, since he never understood it since I first posted it way back on the Vine.If he didn't get it then, I surely don't hold out any hope for him grasping it now. Besides, even if he did understand it, it wouldn't fit his bigoted lifestyle any way, so what's the diff?
Ray Kaye is offline  
Reply

  Defending The Truth Political Forum > Political Issues > Civil Rights > Gay and Lesbian Rights

Tags
constitution, doesn't, understand



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
I can understand G and L but why B and T? garysher Gay and Lesbian Rights 101 December 10th, 2010 07:00 PM
How can we understand people? coberst Philosophy 0 July 29th, 2009 12:15 AM
Now I Understand! I See the Light! tristanrobin Gay and Lesbian Rights 8 August 15th, 2008 02:21 PM
Please help me understand. FAndy Political Talk 22 December 1st, 2005 06:42 PM


Facebook Twitter RSS Feed



Copyright © 2005-2013 Defending The Truth. All rights reserved.