Political Forums  

Go Back   Defending The Truth Political Forum > Political Issues > Civil Rights > Gay and Lesbian Rights

Gay and Lesbian Rights Gay and Lesbian Political Rights Forum - For topics and discussions about LGBT


Thanks Tree138Thanks
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old January 8th, 2016, 06:55 PM   #91
Senior Member
 
Nwolfe35's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
Posts: 15,195
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimmyb View Post
Run, goober, run.
Lets see how many ways jimmyb can avoid answering the question.

Why should we give more credence to your opinion than to that of the majority of the United States Supreme Court and the vast majority of judges from lower courts (and state courts)?
Nwolfe35 is offline  
Old January 8th, 2016, 07:05 PM   #92
Senior Member
 
Jimmyb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Earth
Posts: 38,895
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nwolfe35 View Post
Lets see how many ways jimmyb can avoid answering the question.

Why should we give more credence to your opinion than to that of the majority of the United States Supreme Court and the vast majority of judges from lower courts (and state courts)?
If you are going to copy and paste something as an argument, you have three choices: defend it on the constitutional merit, demonstrate why I am wrong on constitutional merits, or use another one of your patented excuses to run. We all know it will be to run. So here you go again:

Enlighten everyone regarding substantive due process and when it was created, then explain how the court legitimately used a due process doctrine that did not exist in 1866 under the guise that the 39th Congress miraculously predicted the doctrine.

Enlighten everyone as to why the 39th Congress only referenced procedural due process in their debates and explanation of the due process clause.

Then enlighten everyone regarding the author of the equal protection clause, John Bingham, stating that equal protection applied to judicial proceedings, not laws. And you may want to elaborate on Bingham's use of the Magna Carta's equal protection clause being limited to judicial proceedings as the model.
Thanks from caconservative
Jimmyb is offline  
Old January 8th, 2016, 07:08 PM   #93
Senior Member
 
Nwolfe35's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
Posts: 15,195
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimmyb View Post
If you are going to copy and paste something as an argument, you have three choices: defend it on the constitutional merit, demonstrate why I am wrong on constitutional merits, or use another one of your patented excuses to run. We all know it will be to run. So here you go again:

Enlighten everyone regarding substantive due process and when it was created, then explain how the court legitimately used a due process doctrine that did not exist in 1866 under the guise that the 39th Congress miraculously predicted the doctrine.

Enlighten everyone as to why the 39th Congress only referenced procedural due process in their debates and explanation of the due process clause.

Then enlighten everyone regarding the author of the equal protection clause, John Bingham, stating that equal protection applied to judicial proceedings, not laws. And you may want to elaborate on Bingham's use of the Magna Carta's equal protection clause being limited to judicial proceedings as the model.
No there is only ONE response....explain why we should take your opinion over theirs.

The Supreme Court has spoken on this issue (so have the vast majority of lower courts and state courts) and they disagree with you.

Now, why should we believe you and not them?
Nwolfe35 is offline  
Old January 8th, 2016, 07:12 PM   #94
Senior Member
 
Jimmyb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Earth
Posts: 38,895
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nwolfe35 View Post
No there is only ONE response....explain why we should take your opinion over theirs.

The Supreme Court has spoken on this issue (so have the vast majority of lower courts and state courts) and they disagree with you.

Now, why should we believe you and not them?
The bigger questions are why you cannot answer three very simple questions, why you cannot write out a rebutal to my arguments, and why you cannot defend the ruling on the constitutional basis.
Thanks from caconservative
Jimmyb is offline  
Old January 8th, 2016, 07:56 PM   #95
Senior Member
 
Hollywood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Memphis, Tn.
Posts: 20,329
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimmyb View Post
The bigger questions are why you cannot answer three very simple questions, why you cannot write out a rebutal to my arguments, and why you cannot defend the ruling on the constitutional basis.
Who says it's "the bigger question", you?
Who elected you God of this forum?
Thanks from Twisted Sister
Hollywood is offline  
Old January 8th, 2016, 08:06 PM   #96
M(A)GA
 
Sabcat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Earth
Posts: 23,998
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hollywood View Post
Who says it's "the bigger question", you?
Who elected you God of this forum?
Sabcat is offline  
Old January 8th, 2016, 08:26 PM   #97
Senior Member
 
Nwolfe35's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
Posts: 15,195
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimmyb View Post
The bigger questions are why you cannot answer three very simple questions, why you cannot write out a rebutal to my arguments, and why you cannot defend the ruling on the constitutional basis.
Nope, the ONLY question on this thread is why we should think that your opinion is worth more than that of the vast majority of judges in this country that have ruled in this matter?

Answer: We shouldn't. Your just an anonymous internet hack with delusions of pigeonhood.
Nwolfe35 is offline  
Old January 8th, 2016, 08:36 PM   #98
Senior Member
 
Jimmyb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Earth
Posts: 38,895
Can anyone explain why Nwolfe continues to get stumped by an anonymous internet hack?
Thanks from excalibur
Jimmyb is offline  
Old January 9th, 2016, 01:21 AM   #99
Senior Member
 
Twisted Sister's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Brown Township, Ohio
Posts: 11,097
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hollywood View Post
Who says it's "the bigger question", you?
Who elected you God of this forum?
"Who elected you God of this forum?" That is a polite way of saying who elected you Pope of this dump?
Twisted Sister is offline  
Old January 9th, 2016, 04:02 AM   #100
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: massachusetts
Posts: 10,144
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimmyb View Post
Let's see how many ways goober can run.

Enlighten eveyone regarding substantive due process and when it was created, then explain how the court legitimately used a due process doctrine that did not exist in 1866 under the guise that the 39th Congress miraculously predicted the doctrine.

Enlighten eveyone as to why the 39th Congress only referenced procedural due process in their debates and explanation of the due process clause.

Then enlighten everyone regarding the author of the equal protection clause, John Bingham, stating that equal protection applied to udicial proceedings, not laws. And you may want to elaborate on Bingham's use of the Magna Carta's equal protection clause being limited to judical proceedings as the model.
This from a guy who won't tell us what he believes about Noah's ark, or Jesus flying off into space like superman....
But wants us to explain why his ideas, which the Supreme Court says have no merit, aren't revealed wisdom....
Thanks from foundit66 and Hollywood
goober is offline  
Reply

  Defending The Truth Political Forum > Political Issues > Civil Rights > Gay and Lesbian Rights

Tags
alabama, blocking, chief, issues, justice, licenses, marriage, order, samesex



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Judge Roy Moore is the Chief Justice of the state of Alabama intangible child Current Events 11 February 16th, 2015 06:23 PM
Mississippi KKK Chapter Backs Alabama Chief Justice Roy Moore In Anti-Gay Marriage Fi LongWinded Current Events 38 February 14th, 2015 07:22 PM
Alabama's Anti Sharia Law Bill Shoots Down Judges Anti Marriage Equality Order skews13 Current Events 0 February 12th, 2015 01:14 PM
Executive Order -- Blocking Property of Certain Persons Contributing to the Conflict The White House The White House 0 May 14th, 2014 08:20 AM
Executive Order -- Blocking Property of Certain Persons Contributing to the Situation The White House The White House 0 March 6th, 2014 06:22 AM


Facebook Twitter RSS Feed



Copyright © 2005-2013 Defending The Truth. All rights reserved.