Political Forums  

Go Back   Defending The Truth Political Forum > Political Issues > Civil Rights > Gay and Lesbian Rights

Gay and Lesbian Rights Gay and Lesbian Political Rights Forum - For topics and discussions about LGBT


Thanks Tree100Thanks
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old October 20th, 2017, 02:27 PM   #91
Senior Member
 
Hollywood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Memphis, Tn.
Posts: 20,329
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quigley View Post
I already answered. You seem to have a vested interest in all things homosexual. Particularly when it comes to letting a Trans use the little girls room.
YOU brought up homosexuality in our discussion. I never as much as mentioned it in this thread prior to your usual ridiculous crap.
Seems you are the one obsessed with the subject.
Thanks from tristanrobin
Hollywood is offline  
Old October 20th, 2017, 02:52 PM   #92
Spud
 
foundit66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: California
Posts: 5,934
Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by Quigley View Post
Did you want me to raise my pant leg when you hump it? This isn't my first BBQ kid, you're just upset that I will not allow you to control the narrative. You use silly analogies that in no way are applicable to the conversation and then denigrate those who dare stand up to your nonsense. You don't get to decide the intent of anyone's threads, nor do you get to decide the intent of anyone's post.
It just isn't done old boy, not in the best of circles that is.
ROFLMAO!

Like I've been telling you, you're deluding yourself if you don't think you aren't as transparent as water regarding your intentions.

If your intentions were as you claim, you would be able to respond to the very simple questions posed to you. The fact that you can't demonstrates you know you can't discuss your motivation beyond just repeating the obvious lie.

You don't upset me. You got nothing other than saying things are "silly" or blindly repeating yourself.
Even now you can't respond to what I actually said.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Hollywood
YOU brought up homosexuality in our discussion. I never as much as mentioned it in this thread prior to your usual ridiculous crap.
Seems you are the one obsessed with the subject.
The thing is that the retort Quigley gave is such a lame rejoinder that most people recognize is only one layer deep so they don't even bother with trying it.
The person says "yes". The person says "no".
Regardless of which answer is given, then what. What's Quigley's next move after getting his question answered?
He only figured out he has none after you answered it, but now he can't admit that...
Thanks from Hollywood
foundit66 is offline  
Old October 20th, 2017, 03:25 PM   #93
RNG
Senior Member
 
RNG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Between everywhere
Posts: 27,880
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quigley View Post
I already answered. You seem to have a vested interest in all things homosexual. Particularly when it comes to letting a Trans use the little girls room.
You totally fail again. Did you decide to ignore Bubba destroying you in:

Transgender Person On Trial For Sexually Assaulting 10-Year-Old Girl In Bathroom

A brief recap:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bubba
OH and BTW the crime was committed IN A PRIVATE RESIDENCE !!!!! NOT A PUBLIC BATHROOM !!! So your entire argument is TOTAL FUCKING BULLSHIT !!!! You're just being an obtuse little troll. Now go clean you bedroom like your mommy told you to.
Trans Man Sexually Abused Girl In Bathroom | The Daily Caller

But keep lying like your lying god.
Thanks from Hollywood
RNG is offline  
Old October 20th, 2017, 04:51 PM   #94
Political Agnostic
 
Quigley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Bakersfield
Posts: 1,854
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hollywood View Post
YOU brought up homosexuality in our discussion. I never as much as mentioned it in this thread prior to your usual ridiculous crap.
Seems you are the one obsessed with the subject.
You do realize that that's what the thread is about.....you probably don't. It's ok.
Quigley is offline  
Old October 20th, 2017, 04:52 PM   #95
Political Agnostic
 
Quigley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Bakersfield
Posts: 1,854
Quote:
Originally Posted by foundit66 View Post
ROFLMAO!

Like I've been telling you, you're deluding yourself if you don't think you aren't as transparent as water regarding your intentions.

If your intentions were as you claim, you would be able to respond to the very simple questions posed to you. The fact that you can't demonstrates you know you can't discuss your motivation beyond just repeating the obvious lie.

You don't upset me. You got nothing other than saying things are "silly" or blindly repeating yourself.
Even now you can't respond to what I actually said.



The thing is that the retort Quigley gave is such a lame rejoinder that most people recognize is only one layer deep so they don't even bother with trying it.
The person says "yes". The person says "no".
Regardless of which answer is given, then what. What's Quigley's next move after getting his question answered?
He only figured out he has none after you answered it, but now he can't admit that...
(smile) Poor little boy, run along you've been schooled.
Quigley is offline  
Old October 20th, 2017, 04:54 PM   #96
Political Agnostic
 
Quigley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Bakersfield
Posts: 1,854
Quote:
Originally Posted by foundit66 View Post
ROFLMAO!

Like I've been telling you, you're deluding yourself if you don't think you aren't as transparent as water regarding your intentions.

If your intentions were as you claim, you would be able to respond to the very simple questions posed to you. The fact that you can't demonstrates you know you can't discuss your motivation beyond just repeating the obvious lie.

You don't upset me. You got nothing other than saying things are "silly" or blindly repeating yourself.
Even now you can't respond to what I actually said.



The thing is that the retort Quigley gave is such a lame rejoinder that most people recognize is only one layer deep so they don't even bother with trying it.
The person says "yes". The person says "no".
Regardless of which answer is given, then what. What's Quigley's next move after getting his question answered?
He only figured out he has none after you answered it, but now he can't admit that...
You ask a pertinent question and I'll answer it, all you've done is deflect, try to control the narrative and make false equivalencies. Like I said son, you ain't my first BBQ.
Quigley is offline  
Old October 20th, 2017, 05:09 PM   #97
Spud
 
foundit66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: California
Posts: 5,934
Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by Quigley View Post
(smile) Poor little boy, run along you've been schooled.
One thing I've come to realize about people like you is how part of your intent is to derail the thread by reducing it down to bickering and whining.

The only people "running" here are people who run from a topical discussion.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Quigley View Post
You ask a pertinent question and I'll answer it, all you've done is deflect, try to control the narrative and make false equivalencies. Like I said son, you ain't my first BBQ.
And again, all you do is making sweeping, declarative summations while providing absolutely no justification for how you got to that conclusion.

WHY are my questions not pertinent?
What narrative have I tried to control? Is it when I try to stick to the topic that I am "controlling" the "narrative"?
WHY are the arguments posed "false equivalencies"?


Anybody can make grandiose claims regarding the inadequacies of people's arguments.
It takes conversational skills to explain why the other person is wrong. And repeatedly, you cower from even trying to do that.


Conversation with some right-wingers:
Right-winger: Point A
Bill: Point B (in response to Point A)
Right-winger: Nuh-uh! You're wrong and I give no explanation as to why I think that. Repeating Point A
....
Thanks from tristanrobin and Hollywood
foundit66 is offline  
Old October 20th, 2017, 07:30 PM   #98
M(A)GA
 
Sabcat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Earth
Posts: 23,998
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hollywood View Post
YOU brought up homosexuality in our discussion. I never as much as mentioned it in this thread prior to your usual ridiculous crap.
Seems you are the one obsessed with the subject.
What was the title of the thread again?
Sabcat is offline  
Old October 20th, 2017, 07:34 PM   #99
M(A)GA
 
Sabcat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Earth
Posts: 23,998
Quote:
Originally Posted by guy39 View Post
No, there has been no rights taken away. You can keep saying it over and over but it has not happened.
Round and round. So funny. Cannot demonstrate a single right taken from the gays but transvestites are gays don't ya know because postmodernism. These people are hilarious..
Thanks from guy39 and Sensible
Sabcat is offline  
Old October 20th, 2017, 08:42 PM   #100
Senior Member
 
guy39's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Kekistan
Posts: 2,652
Quote:
Originally Posted by foundit66 View Post
So, no actual response to the statements given.
Just repeating yourself in denial...



Quigley has amusingly been throwing out accusations regarding not being used to conversations.
But the reality is that some right-wingers on this forum (Quigley included) have a bizarre incapability to hold a conversation.

Normal Conversation:
Jack: Point A
Bill: Point B (in response to Point A)
Jack: Point C (in responce to Point
Bill: Point D (in response to Point C)
Jack: Point E (in responce to Point D)

And so forth.

Conversation with some right-wingers:
Right-winger: Point A
Bill: Point B (in response to Point A)
Right-winger: Nuh-uh! Point A
....




I find it amusing that I have come to recognize some people starting sentences with "I guess ..." is code for what comes next has no rational justification for the claim.

Who the heck has made any statement of:
a) Using whatever bathroom you want is a right?
b) Doing away with age-of-consent laws?

Some right-wingers wouldn't be able to post if they were inhibited from lying about somebody else's position...
There was no rights taken away is the only statement that I am concerned with. Now, its real simple. Either you can name rights that Trump has "taken" away from the gay community or you cant.
guy39 is offline  
Reply

  Defending The Truth Political Forum > Political Issues > Civil Rights > Gay and Lesbian Rights

Tags
acceptable, homophobia, making, pence, trump



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Pence could hopefully go down with trump. GhostRider Americas 1 April 1st, 2017 12:13 PM
Pence as big a liar as Trump GhostRider Americas 34 March 18th, 2017 10:36 AM
Do you think Trump can trust Pence? Elagablus Current Events 3 January 22nd, 2017 12:30 PM
Looks like Trump picks Pence excalibur Current Events 27 July 17th, 2016 04:09 PM
Trump/Pence the oddest couple. GhostRider Americas 20 July 16th, 2016 11:32 PM


Facebook Twitter RSS Feed



Copyright © 2005-2013 Defending The Truth. All rights reserved.