Political Forums  

Go Back   Defending The Truth Political Forum > Political Issues > Civil Rights > Gay and Lesbian Rights

Gay and Lesbian Rights Gay and Lesbian Political Rights Forum - For topics and discussions about LGBT


Thanks Tree100Thanks
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old October 20th, 2017, 05:06 AM   #71
Senior Member
 
tristanrobin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: New Haven, CT
Posts: 23,262
Quote:
Originally Posted by guy39 View Post
I have never met him and I do not think he is pathetic. I think he is mad and upset over his political party losing an election. His anger was fueled even more because he was lied to by the press, by his constituents and by pollsters. He was probably in a virtual daze for a day or two following the election. Not sure what even happened.
just for the record.
I'm not mad and upset that Secretary Clinton lost. I'm not even mad and upset that the Democrats lost (though I admit that I would have preferred they win). I was a Bernie Sanders supporter, so I'm not a Clinton cheerleader.
I will admit to being angry that a vain-glorious, thin-skinned, vindictive, childish, dishonest - totally dishonest, mean-spirited, unqualified, vicious vulgarian was elected to the most dignified office in our nation.
I was never in a daze - I was quite aware of what happened ... a man who made it socially acceptable to voice one's ignorant prejudices, bigotries and fears loudly and in public had been chosen by "the people" to represent them.
He does not represent me - in any way.
Thanks from RNG
tristanrobin is offline  
Old October 20th, 2017, 07:39 AM   #72
Political Agnostic
 
Quigley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Bakersfield
Posts: 1,855
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hollywood View Post
"Alternate facts"
"Fake News"
"RINO"
...
Are you gay HW? You seem to have a vested interest in caving to whatever the want.
Quigley is offline  
Old October 20th, 2017, 07:49 AM   #73
Senior Member
 
Hollywood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Memphis, Tn.
Posts: 21,837
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quigley View Post
Are you gay HW? You seem to have a vested interest in caving to whatever the want.
I'm sorry, you're post makes no grammatical sense whatsoever.
"You seem to have a vest interest in caving to whatever the want."
WTF??? ...

Now try it again.
Hollywood is offline  
Old October 20th, 2017, 07:54 AM   #74
Spud
 
foundit66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: California
Posts: 5,934
Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by Quigley View Post
LOL, you're not used to actually conversing are you? A Transgender raped a kid, what does that have to do with "homophobia"
I just explained the connection.
And if I have to use more words to dumb it down for you, you're going to whine about how many words I use.

The only obvious conclusion is that you want to find some excuse to not talk about what was said.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Quigley View Post
... is it ok because it wasn't YOUR kid?
What the heck are you even talking about here?
Where did I even say anything that remotely resembles thinking the attack on the children in this thread or the other was okay?



Quote:
Originally Posted by guy39 View Post
Did it take away a right? Its a yes or no question
Yes.
Do you understand there is such a thing as the CIVIL RIGHTS ACT which provides employment protection? Thus acknowledging that it is a right...



Quote:
Originally Posted by Hollywood View Post
I'm sorry, you're post makes no grammatical sense whatsoever.
"You seem to have a vest interest in caving to whatever the want."
WTF??? ...

Now try it again.
He's lashing out. He can't discuss the topic so he's going on the attack without any semblance of trying to be topical...
It's gotten so bad his replies don't even make sense.
Thanks from Hollywood
foundit66 is offline  
Old October 20th, 2017, 08:04 AM   #75
Senior Member
 
Hollywood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Memphis, Tn.
Posts: 21,837
Quote:
Originally Posted by foundit66 View Post
I just explained the connection.
And if I have to use more words to dumb it down for you, you're going to whine about how many words I use.

The only obvious conclusion is that you want to find some excuse to not talk about what was said.


What the heck are you even talking about here?
Where did I even say anything that remotely resembles thinking the attack on the children in this thread or the other was okay?




Yes.
Do you understand there is such a thing as the CIVIL RIGHTS ACT which provides employment protection? Thus acknowledging that it is a right...




He's lashing out. He can't discuss the topic so he's going on the attack without any semblance of trying to be topical...
It's gotten so bad his replies don't even make sense.
Quigley's comment made no sense. Sure, he's attempting to insult me. But why and exactly what form does the insult take?
Hollywood is offline  
Old October 20th, 2017, 08:04 AM   #76
Political Agnostic
 
Quigley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Bakersfield
Posts: 1,855
Quote:
Originally Posted by foundit66 View Post
I just explained the connection.
And if I have to use more words to dumb it down for you, you're going to whine about how many words I use.

The only obvious conclusion is that you want to find some excuse to not talk about what was said.


What the heck are you even talking about here?
Where did I even say anything that remotely resembles thinking the attack on the children in this thread or the other was okay?




Yes.
Do you understand there is such a thing as the CIVIL RIGHTS ACT which provides employment protection? Thus acknowledging that it is a right...




He's lashing out. He can't discuss the topic so he's going on the attack without any semblance of trying to be topical...
It's gotten so bad his replies don't even make sense.
Too funny kid. A Transgender raped a child and you are defending "his/her" right to use the wrong restroom. That's ALL that's on here. You can scream and kick your feet all day but that doesn't change the fact you don't get to put words in my mouth or tell me what my "agenda" is. I never "lash" out son, I know you are a legend in your own mind but you just aren't all that.

Fact, I'm saying they need to use the Men's room, you're defending their perceived "right" be around little girls in the Ladies room. That's it in a nutshell son.
Quigley is offline  
Old October 20th, 2017, 08:05 AM   #77
Political Agnostic
 
Quigley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Bakersfield
Posts: 1,855
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hollywood View Post
I'm sorry, you're post makes no grammatical sense whatsoever.
"You seem to have a vest interest in caving to whatever the want."
WTF??? ...

Now try it again.
I take it you are gay? Not n insult at all, you can have sex with anyone you want. As long as the are old enough.
Quigley is offline  
Old October 20th, 2017, 08:13 AM   #78
Senior Member
 
Hollywood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Memphis, Tn.
Posts: 21,837
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quigley View Post
I take it you are gay? Not n insult at all, you can have sex with anyone you want. As long as the are old enough.
No, I am not gay. Whatever would give you that idea?
Please clarify and explain why you would think I was.
I'm simply fascinated by how your mind works, how you arrive at conclusions.
Carry on.
Hollywood is offline  
Old October 20th, 2017, 08:13 AM   #79
Spud
 
foundit66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: California
Posts: 5,934
Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by Quigley View Post
Too funny kid. A Transgender raped a child and you are defending "his/her" right to use the wrong restroom.
So, if a pastor rapes a kid, would I also be defending the pastor's right to use a restroom?
< end sarcasm >

For the person involved in the rape (in the other thread), I "defend" giving that person a mandatory exclusion zone from entering areas where kids are.
That individual gets that because he raped a kid.
Transgender in general should no more have their rights restricted because of individual crimes than you or I.

And again, you try to dance back forth between proving your motivation was political agenda in posting this thread ...
... and denying the obvious.
HOW do you think that's rational or believable?


Quote:
Originally Posted by Quigley View Post
That's ALL that's on here. You can scream and kick your feet all day but that doesn't change the fact you don't get to put words in my mouth or tell me what my "agenda" is. I never "lash" out son, I know you are a legend in your own mind but you just aren't all that.
It would be funny to see you actually censor your insults from your posts before posting.
How much empty space would be left?

The truth is you have an agenda. You wear it on your sleeve but then you lie about it.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Quigley View Post
Fact, I'm saying they need to use the Men's room, you're defending their perceived "right" be around little girls in the Ladies room. That's it in a nutshell son.
Again, you seem to fail to comprehend your position is understood.
It's "simple" enough that you don't need to keep repeating it.

What you need to TRY to do is start responding to people who point out why your position is b.s.
As a country, it's repugnant to pretend that an entire category of people should be limited in their rights based on what the individuals may be guilty of doing.
Do you get that?



Quote:
Originally Posted by Quigley View Post
I take it you are gay? Not n insult at all, you can have sex with anyone you want. As long as the are old enough.
My bad Hollywood.
Quigley is actually hitting on you and he wants a date...
foundit66 is offline  
Old October 20th, 2017, 08:17 AM   #80
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Michigan
Posts: 3,515
Quote:
Originally Posted by foundit66 View Post
So, if a pastor rapes a kid, would I also be defending the pastor's right to use a restroom?
< end sarcasm >

For the person involved in the rape (in the other thread), I "defend" giving that person a mandatory exclusion zone from entering areas where kids are.
That individual gets that because he raped a kid.
Transgender in general should no more have their rights restricted because of individual crimes than you or I.

And again, you try to dance back forth between proving your motivation was political agenda in posting this thread ...
... and denying the obvious.
HOW do you think that's rational or believable?



It would be funny to see you actually censor your insults from your posts before posting.
How much empty space would be left?

The truth is you have an agenda. You wear it on your sleeve but then you lie about it.



Again, you seem to fail to comprehend your position is understood.
It's "simple" enough that you don't need to keep repeating it.

What you need to TRY to do is start responding to people who point out why your position is b.s.
As a country, it's repugnant to pretend that an entire category of people should be limited in their rights based on what the individuals may be guilty of doing.
Do you get that?




My bad Hollywood.
Quigley is actually hitting on you and he wants a date...
What is the matter are you jealous?
Sensible is offline  
Reply

  Defending The Truth Political Forum > Political Issues > Civil Rights > Gay and Lesbian Rights

Tags
acceptable, homophobia, making, pence, trump



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Pence could hopefully go down with trump. GhostRider Americas 1 April 1st, 2017 11:13 AM
Pence as big a liar as Trump GhostRider Americas 34 March 18th, 2017 09:36 AM
Do you think Trump can trust Pence? Elagablus Current Events 3 January 22nd, 2017 11:30 AM
Looks like Trump picks Pence excalibur Current Events 27 July 17th, 2016 03:09 PM
Trump/Pence the oddest couple. GhostRider Americas 20 July 16th, 2016 10:32 PM


Facebook Twitter RSS Feed



Copyright © 2005-2013 Defending The Truth. All rights reserved.