Political Forums  

Go Back   Defending The Truth Political Forum > Political Issues > Gun Control

Gun Control Gun Control Forum - For topics and discussions about gun laws, gun policies, and gun rights


Thanks Tree47Thanks
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old October 23rd, 2017, 11:57 AM   #11
Banned
 
Hashtag's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Upside Down
Posts: 714
Quote:
Originally Posted by jbander View Post
I always know that I have these meatheads where I want them when they go after my spelling or the way I conjugate a verb. Love it.


Yeah, you've got a bag of nothing. Just another foreigner lecturing us and giving us laughs. Americans don't use "neighbour".

But 'tanks' for the laughs.
Hashtag is offline  
Old October 23rd, 2017, 11:58 AM   #12
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 172
All you need to own artillery is to file for approval with BATFE, and that is nothing, if you have a good record they don't turn you down but they stretch it out as long as possible months probably. and pay a tax for both the artillery and the shells. This guy knows nothing about the law and that's the clowns you run into on all forums like this. Brain dead is the word I'm looking for. Look at his comments through this thread, he goes from a know it all, to a bumpkin as fast as I prove him wrong about literally everything he said . He has no clue at all.

Last edited by jbander; October 23rd, 2017 at 12:00 PM.
jbander is offline  
Old October 23rd, 2017, 12:02 PM   #13
RNG
Senior Member
 
RNG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Between everywhere
Posts: 26,860
Quote:
Originally Posted by jbander View Post
Buddy you have very little knowledge of this subject, Tell me I can't buy a machine gun with shells and use it in my back yard/ Or artillery
Felons owning guns= some State could give back guns to serious felonies as soon as they were out of jail. Some hate run states could drop the law on a serious felon anytime they wanted and hate run states would do it yesterday, because that's their bang bang voters

Approved by Obama ya you bet, the bump stock is not a mechanical device so it can't be regulated as part of the gun law. From politifacts""But did Obama approve their legality? Sort of, but approved is probably the wrong word." A bump stock has no mechanical mechanism that actually pulls the trigger , it makes the finger pull the trigger as fast as a machine gun. No one , under the existing law could write a law against it.
Silencer law= the hate party as we speak is going to pass a law that allows silencers. I would love to hear what these are needed for , other then the obvious. Isn't it amazing how much bullshit or distortions these clowns use or try to use to sell their bullshit. I've always said without lies and distortions the conservative party of 2017 wouldn't or couldn't exist
Didn't you read the official name of the act that makes silencers legal?

It's called "The Some Kind of Bullshit About Protecting the Hearing of Hunters and Sports Shooters" or words to that effect.
Thanks from Clara007
RNG is offline  
Old October 23rd, 2017, 12:03 PM   #14
Banned
 
Hashtag's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Upside Down
Posts: 714
Quote:
Originally Posted by jbander View Post
Buddy you have very little knowledge of this subject, Tell me I can't buy a machine gun with shells and use it in my back yard/ Or artillery
Felons owning guns= some State could give back guns to serious felonies as soon as they were out of jail. Some hate run states could drop the law on a serious felon anytime they wanted and hate run states would do it yesterday, because that's their bang bang voters

Approved by Obama ya you bet, the bump stock is not a mechanical device so it can't be regulated as part of the gun law. From politifacts""But did Obama approve their legality? Sort of, but approved is probably the wrong

word." A bump stock has no mechanical mechanism that actually pulls the trigger , it makes the finger pull the trigger as fast as a machine gun. No one , under the existing law could write a law against it.
Silencer law= the hate party as we speak is going to pass a law that allows silencers. I would love to hear what these are needed for , other then the obvious. Isn't it amazing how much bullshit or distortions these clowns use or try to use to sell their bullshit. I've always said without lies and distortions the conservative party of 2017 wouldn't or couldn't exist


LOL

On and on you drone, touching all the loony, goofy, left-wing fallacies about tanks and field artillery.

So you can't point to felons legally purchasing guns. Not surprising.

Silencers aren't the Hollywood BS. You expose yourself as indeed as a goofy leftist.
Hashtag is offline  
Old October 23rd, 2017, 12:03 PM   #15
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 172
Trust me, when I prove everything he said is shit , he will shift to just telling me I'm dumb and he doesn't like me. whoopee ding. Just watch. Or maybe my bad spelling again. Show us your stuff big guy!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
jbander is offline  
Old October 23rd, 2017, 12:05 PM   #16
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 172
Quote:
Originally Posted by RNG View Post
Didn't you read the official name of the act that makes silencers legal?

It's called "The Some Kind of Bullshit About Protecting the Hearing of Hunters and Sports Shooters" or words to that effect.
Yup that's my whole point, these brain dead bang bang heads think that the second is the whole can of beans and is everything ,as they shit on the first.
jbander is offline  
Old October 23rd, 2017, 12:06 PM   #17
Banned
 
Hashtag's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Upside Down
Posts: 714
Quote:
Originally Posted by jbander View Post
All you need to own artillery is to file for approval with BATFE, and that is nothing, if you have a good record they don't turn you down but they stretch it out as long as possible months probably. and pay a tax for both the artillery and the shells. This guy knows nothing about the law and that's the clowns you run into on all forums like this. Brain dead is the word I'm looking for. Look at his comments through this thread, he goes from a know it all, to a bumpkin as fast as I prove him wrong about literally everything he said . He has no clue at all.

Yeah, there's a lot of field artillery around. Not to mention tanks, hey! Some guy just drove one by me, towing some field artillery. His wife was holding a bazooka.
Hashtag is offline  
Old October 23rd, 2017, 12:10 PM   #18
Spud
 
foundit66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: California
Posts: 5,934
Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hashtag View Post
No one says mentally ill should be allowed to buy guns. What Obama's repealed order did was aimed primarily at older people who might not be able to do their finances but otherwise are fine. You cannot preempt peoples rights, capiche? Because that is what Obama's order did, it preempted peoples rights.
What circular logic hell is this?
So, no one SAYS that the mentally ill should be allowed to own guns.
What they do is fight against any classification of mentally ill that would restrict gun purchases.

It's like saying that people in pink shirts should not be allowed to buy a gun.
But then the NRA insists that people wearing shirts are actually wearing "salmon" colored shirts.

Quite frankly, what are the NRA standards which would be agreeable to document that a mentally ill person should not have a gun?
Is it that they were convicted of shooting up people? Is that where their standards are? Already having committed the crime?


Quote:
Originally Posted by Hashtag View Post
And who says felons should legally buy guns? What felons are you referring to?
Again, it's not saying "felons should legally buy guns".
It's a fight against methods to identify felons so that we can recognize they shouldn't be allowed to buy that gun. Fighting against background checks.
foundit66 is offline  
Old October 23rd, 2017, 12:10 PM   #19
Banned
 
Hashtag's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Upside Down
Posts: 714
Silencers do not provide the effect that the buffoons in Hollywood have led you to believe. Try educating yourselves.

No, gun silencers wouldn't have worsened the Las Vegas shooting | PolitiFact
Thanks from caconservative

Last edited by Hashtag; October 23rd, 2017 at 12:13 PM.
Hashtag is offline  
Old October 23rd, 2017, 12:22 PM   #20
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 172
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hashtag View Post
Silencers do not provide the effect that the buffoons in Hollywood have led you to believe. Try educating yourselves.

No, gun silencers wouldn't have worsened the Las Vegas shooting | PolitiFact
Who the hell cares about some scab response to a point that I don't give a flick about. That is hardly the real charge why people
appose silencers.

Last edited by jbander; October 23rd, 2017 at 12:25 PM.
jbander is offline  
Reply

  Defending The Truth Political Forum > Political Issues > Gun Control

Tags
make, threat, world



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Make America Great Again Get Rid Of The Dumbest Idea In The World skews13 Americas 29 February 3rd, 2016 12:01 AM
Serious Threat to the World as We Know It RNG Current Events 5 June 17th, 2015 09:28 AM
Israel and the United States are the Greatest Threat to World Peace Global Crier Warfare 36 July 21st, 2006 04:16 PM
Right Wingers the Biggest Threat to World Peace Global Crier Political Talk 7 July 13th, 2006 06:47 PM


Facebook Twitter RSS Feed



Copyright © 2005-2013 Defending The Truth. All rights reserved.