Political Forums  

Go Back   Defending The Truth Political Forum > Political Issues > Gun Control

Gun Control Gun Control Forum - For topics and discussions about gun laws, gun policies, and gun rights


Thanks Tree47Thanks
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old October 23rd, 2017, 12:22 PM   #21
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: California
Posts: 17,231
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clara007 View Post
The people of which you speak are those who follow the Dead Documents Diet. They are Scalia-ites. They delight in telling us what the framers thought--why they wrote what they wrote--what they believed--how they lived and what they want "we the people" to do now--220 years+ later. Stay with the good ol' dead constitution, said Scalia. "The only good constitution is a dead constitution."
Apparently Scalia and his followers held seances which allowed them to speak directly to the founders. This MUST be how they know FOR SURE what the founders believed.

The problem with a living Constitution in a word is that somebody has to decide how it grows and when it is that new rights are you know come forth.
AND so it goes. The 2nd Amendment stands. Americans can have new fangled killing machines--as many as they want--any time they want---with very few restrictions.
So let it be written. So let it be done. Scalia
Are you that Constitutionally impaired? If you are representative of teachers in general, we're in trouble. Teacher...educate YOUR SELF!!
caconservative is offline  
Old October 23rd, 2017, 12:32 PM   #22
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 172
I think this proves beyond a doubt that hashtag doesn't have a clue what he is talking about , every thing he said about Tanks and artillery, I have disproved totally . Every point he made turned out to be total bullshit. And I proved it. Well almost everything, he said I was a bad speller , that is true.

Here's a place you can buy just about every weapon available from the russian satellite countries. www.mortarinvestments.eu it's hard to get through , the whole world is looking at the page. Here is a article about the company https://tankandafvnews.com/tag/mortar-investments/
jbander is offline  
Old October 23rd, 2017, 12:35 PM   #23
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 172
Quote:
Originally Posted by caconservative View Post
Are you that Constitutionally impaired? If you are representative of teachers in general, we're in trouble. Teacher...educate YOUR SELF!!
If your a conservative I guarantee that you write your own interpretation of the Constitution, never met one of you who didn't.
Thanks from Clara007
jbander is offline  
Old October 23rd, 2017, 12:37 PM   #24
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: California
Posts: 17,231
Quote:
Originally Posted by jbander View Post
If your a conservative I guarantee that you write your own interpretation of the Constitution, never met one of you who didn't.
Then, you'll have no problem siting one of those interpretations, will you?
caconservative is offline  
Old October 23rd, 2017, 12:37 PM   #25
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: in that one house at that location over there
Posts: 2,090
Quote:
Originally Posted by jbander View Post
I don't mind the 2nd amendment, I do mind the idea that these redneck right wing bangers think that means it can't be regulated. You can buy a machine gun and bullets , a tank , artillery, and anything you want(that's legal) to shoot through it. That's ridiculous. It takes the brain dead to see that as being right thing to do or that's what the constitution means, or that these things are protected in the constitution , This goofy group will wave flags and jump up and down over the 2nd while they piss on the 1st amendment. They pick and choose what they want in the constitution or these dingbats redefine the constitution to fit their little hate world.
Quote:
Originally Posted by guy39 View Post
https://www.atf.gov/resource-center/...-4pdf/download

That is just a summary of federal firearm regulations. You still do not believe they are regulated? lmao
Quote:
Originally Posted by jbander View Post
I would love to see where I said that. I never said it wasn't regulated . I know you think you have to shoot me down but come on try something that has substance. That is simply lying and if that's your routine then why would I want to comment to you.

Respond to this"These Goofies think there is a real threat to the second with the ability to buy a tank legally with shells ,park it in your front yard, or maybe a machine gun for Christmas , maybe a loaded anti tank gun to put in your yard just in case your neighbours buys a tank also. Any type of field artillery of course is legal but somehow these Goofies think that there is a threat to the second. You just have to laugh at these poor minds being tooled 100% by the goofy right."
You said..
Quote:
I don't mind the 2nd amendment, I do mind the idea that these redneck right wing bangers think that means it can't be regulated.
So therefore your implication is there is not enough regulation.
guy39 is offline  
Old October 23rd, 2017, 12:39 PM   #26
Banned
 
Hashtag's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Upside Down
Posts: 714
Quote:
Originally Posted by jbander View Post
I think this proves beyond a doubt that hashtag doesn't have a clue what he is talking about , every thing he said about Tanks and artillery, I have disproved totally . Every point he made turned out to be total bullshit. And I proved it. Well almost everything, he said I was a bad speller , that is true.

Here's a place you can buy just about every weapon available from the russian satellite countries. www.mortarinvestments.eu it's hard to get through , the whole world is looking at the page. Here is a article about the company https://tankandafvnews.com/tag/mortar-investments/

LOL

You are a tool.

Tanks here, tanks there, everywhere you go there's tanks. Not to mention field artillery as far as the eye can see.

Last edited by Hashtag; October 23rd, 2017 at 12:48 PM.
Hashtag is offline  
Old October 23rd, 2017, 12:40 PM   #27
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: in that one house at that location over there
Posts: 2,090
Quote:
Originally Posted by foundit66 View Post
What circular logic hell is this?
So, no one SAYS that the mentally ill should be allowed to own guns.
What they do is fight against any classification of mentally ill that would restrict gun purchases.

It's like saying that people in pink shirts should not be allowed to buy a gun.
But then the NRA insists that people wearing shirts are actually wearing "salmon" colored shirts.

Quite frankly, what are the NRA standards which would be agreeable to document that a mentally ill person should not have a gun?
Is it that they were convicted of shooting up people? Is that where their standards are? Already having committed the crime?



Again, it's not saying "felons should legally buy guns".
It's a fight against methods to identify felons so that we can recognize they shouldn't be allowed to buy that gun. Fighting against background checks.
I do oppose any "classification" that denies a Constitutional right without due process. Such as no-fly lists, or your second cousin twice removed saying your crazy in order to meet the requirements of a "classification" that you know nothing of and have been given no due process. I dont know, just seems un-American to start "classifying" people without due process in order to usurp inherent rights.
guy39 is offline  
Old October 23rd, 2017, 12:47 PM   #28
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: in that one house at that location over there
Posts: 2,090
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clara007 View Post
The people of which you speak are those who follow the Dead Documents Diet. They are Scalia-ites. They delight in telling us what the framers thought--why they wrote what they wrote--what they believed--how they lived and what they want "we the people" to do now--220 years+ later. Stay with the good ol' dead constitution, said Scalia. "The only good constitution is a dead constitution."
Apparently Scalia and his followers held seances which allowed them to speak directly to the founders. This MUST be how they know FOR SURE what the founders believed.

The problem with a living Constitution in a word is that somebody has to decide how it grows and when it is that new rights are you know come forth.
AND so it goes. The 2nd Amendment stands. Americans can have new fangled killing machines--as many as they want--any time they want---with very few restrictions.
So let it be written. So let it be done. Scalia
There it is! I knew we would get around to the living Constitution bullshit. This quote is classic
Quote:
The problem with a living Constitution in a word is that somebody has to decide how it grows and when it is that new rights are you know come forth.
Someone? A supreme leader perhaps comrade?

Quote:
AND so it goes. The 2nd Amendment stands. Americans can have new fangled killing machines--as many as they want--any time they want---with very few restrictions.
So let it be written. So let it be done.
That was spoken with total ignorance. You are truly ignorant of firearm regulations to even utter such horrid fecal matter.

This is just a reference to gun laws on the federal level. It does not include,
State, County or City.
https://www.atf.gov/file/11241/download
Thanks from Hashtag
guy39 is offline  
Old October 23rd, 2017, 12:51 PM   #29
Banned
 
Hashtag's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Upside Down
Posts: 714
Liberalism is a mental disorder.
Hashtag is offline  
Old October 23rd, 2017, 01:07 PM   #30
Spud
 
foundit66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: California
Posts: 5,934
Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by guy39 View Post
I do oppose any "classification" that denies a Constitutional right without due process. Such as no-fly lists, or your second cousin twice removed saying your crazy in order to meet the requirements of a "classification" that you know nothing of and have been given no due process. I dont know, just seems un-American to start "classifying" people without due process in order to usurp inherent rights.
Like voting?

Your post proves exactly what I was saying.
Only after a Las Vegas shooter kills dozens of people and convicted do some people think that THEN he can be restricted.
foundit66 is offline  
Reply

  Defending The Truth Political Forum > Political Issues > Gun Control

Tags
make, threat, world



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Make America Great Again Get Rid Of The Dumbest Idea In The World skews13 Americas 29 February 3rd, 2016 12:01 AM
Serious Threat to the World as We Know It RNG Current Events 5 June 17th, 2015 09:28 AM
Israel and the United States are the Greatest Threat to World Peace Global Crier Warfare 36 July 21st, 2006 04:16 PM
Right Wingers the Biggest Threat to World Peace Global Crier Political Talk 7 July 13th, 2006 06:47 PM


Facebook Twitter RSS Feed



Copyright © 2005-2013 Defending The Truth. All rights reserved.