Political Forums  

Go Back   Defending The Truth Political Forum > Political Issues > Healthcare

Healthcare Healthcare Forum - For topics and discussions about health care, health policies, and health care systems


Thanks Tree8Thanks
  • 2 Post By coke
  • 1 Post By Sabcat
  • 1 Post By coke
  • 1 Post By Sabcat
  • 1 Post By coke
  • 2 Post By coke
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old August 17th, 2016, 02:39 AM   #1
Back to bum status
 
coke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: nunya
Posts: 12,561
Another nail in the ACA coffin

Aetna decision exposes weaknesses in Obama’s health-care law

Aetna decision exposes weaknesses in Obama?s health-care law

Quote:
Insurance giant Aetna’s decision to stop offering much of its individual coverage through the Affordable Care Act is exposing a problem in President Obama’s signature health-care law that could lead to another fraught political battle in Congress.

Aetna’s announcement Monday night was the latest sign that large insurers are losing money in the Affordable Care Act’s marketplaces, heightening concerns about the long-term stability of a key part of Obama’s domestic policy legacy. But addressing this issue could open the door to a nasty political fight, given that some Republicans have vowed to repeal the law outright.

If insurers continue to lose money, more are likely to withdraw from the marketplaces, a move that would reduce choices for consumers and could contribute to higher premiums. In one county, Aetna’s exit in 2017 could leave no insurers offering policies through its marketplace.

Aetna said it will exit 11 of the 15 states where it offers coverage through the Affordable Care Act, widely known as Obamacare. That affects about 80 percent of its customers covered through insurance marketplaces.

The marketplaces, known as insurance exchanges, were created to provide coverage for Americans who cannot get affordable health benefits through a job. A key aspect of the health-care law, the marketplaces allow people to purchase insurance online with subsidies based on their income.
Aetna will become the latest health insurer to cut back its participation in the Affordable Care Act’s public exchanges.© Jessica Hill/Associated Press Aetna will become the latest health insurer to cut back its participation in the Affordable Care Act’s public exchanges.

Earlier this month, Humana said it will cut back its participation on the exchanges from 15 states to 11. On an earnings call in July, UnitedHealth Group chief executive Stephen Hemsley announced that his company plans to remain on “three or fewer exchange markets.”

In a reversal of expectations, Anthem said it is projecting mid-single-digit losses on the individual plans it sells on the exchanges for 2016. And Cigna has said that it is losing money on the exchanges, although the insurer is planning to expand its marketplace presence to three new states in 2017.

The health-care law is likely to prompt another heated political battle, regardless of which party wins the White House and control of Congress in November.

GOP presidential nominee Donald Trump has suggested that he would seek to scrap it altogether. Quoting a news story by Reuters on Tuesday, he tweeted: “Another health insurer is pulling back due to ‘persistent financial losses on #Obamacare plans.’ Only the beginning!”

Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton has pledged to modify the law to expand coverage and wants to add a public insurance option.

Both candidates’ proposals would face stiff political headwinds, but several health-care experts said lawmakers could still pursue more modest changes to make the program work better.

“The idea of somehow repealing it is far-fetched,” said Joseph Antos, a resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute. “But changing it is not far-fetched.”

There are many possible policy remedies, but the main issues have to do with the risk pool — the balance between healthy people and sick people with higher health-care expenses. Many insurers have noted that people who have signed up for health insurance on the marketplaces are sicker, putting greater demands on the system.

“You have here a situation which all of us who care about the exchanges have to worry about,” said Zeke Emanuel, who served as a top White House health policy adviser during Obama’s first term and is now vice provost for global initiatives at the University of Pennsylvania. “There is a problem with the risk pool. There is a problem with the numbers of people signing up.”

One solution would be to entice more people — particularly healthy ones — to sign up for insurance, whether through a more robust public outreach campaign or by warning them about escalating financial penalties for not having coverage. Another would be to find new and better ways to give insurers that cover the sickest people greater financial relief.

“There are incremental steps the administration can take to address that, but I think more significant changes would require legislation that could get bipartisan support,” said Mark McClellan, director of the Margolis Center for Health Policy at Duke University.

In a statement Tuesday, Clinton spokesman Jesse Ferguson said the candidate is committed to expanding the law, which Obama signed in 2010.

“Hillary Clinton has outlined concrete plans to make health coverage more affordable in and out of the marketplaces, with more choices, expanded relief for costs, aggressively containing prescription drug expenses and the choice of a public option,” he said.

Many of these initiatives, along with any move to stiffen the financial penalties for not purchasing insurance, would require congressional approval.

In the meantime, however, some insurers are pulling back — and at least one county in Arizona has no insurers slated to sell marketplace plans in 2017.

Aetna chief executive Mark Bertolini said in a statement that there are not enough healthy people to financially offset those with major health problems who require high-cost care. As of June 30, Aetna covered 838,000 people through the exchanges. In total, 11.1 million people were signed up for the marketplace plans at the end of March.

Katherine Hempstead, a senior adviser at the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, said that these national carriers haven’t traditionally been the biggest part of the exchanges.

“I think the market could survive without these guys,” she said. “Obviously, it would be better to see lots of people seeing a lot of opportunity in this space. . . . But I don’t think it’s a chapter in a Greek tragedy.”

The decisions also come as four of the major insurers are in a battle with the Obama administration. The Justice Department has blocked two proposed mergers: between Aetna and Humana, and between Anthem and Cigna. The companies are fighting the decisions.

Anthem has said that if its proposed deal with Cigna is allowed to go through, it will increase its exchange offerings to nine additional states.

Caroline Pearson, a senior vice president at Avalere Health, a health-care consulting firm, said that the lawsuit may have affected the timing of Aetna’s announcement — in late April, Bertolini described the marketplace as “a good investment” — but not the underlying facts about the viability of the marketplaces.

House Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Fred Upton (R-Mich.) said in a statement that the administration deserves the blame. “Plans are rapidly exiting the so-called marketplace because Washington has damaged and upended the insurance markets,” he said.

But Rep. Diana DeGette (Colo.), the top Democrat on Energy and Commerce’s subcommittee on oversight and investigations, said in an interview Tuesday that Republicans “seem to be hell-bent” on holding hearings “to support their multitude of efforts to repeal the ACA” and “have totally neglected their duty to try to fix it.”

DeGette said multiple senior and influential Republicans have told her privately that they are open to tweaking the health-care law after the November elections, when they have a clearer sense of the new political landscape.

“There’s a long list of things large and small that need to be adjusted,” she said. “But I don’t think anyone can say what that is until we know what the new Congress looks like.”
Thanks from caconservative and Sabcat
coke is offline  
Old August 17th, 2016, 04:44 AM   #2
TW
 
Sabcat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Earth
Posts: 19,497
yeah, fuck those greedy businesses!!! we need to pass laws to force them to insure everyone. this is america. everybody has a right to the services that their business provides regardless if they can afford it or not. and fuck those selfish healthy people for not signing up for an inflated, over priced, watered down product.do they not understand that w/o them paying for this service that they don't need, then the greedy businesses cannot leverage their losses from the people who are over using the system by over charging the people who do not. those selfish pricks! don't they know that it is their duty as americans to subsidize the lives of the rest of society no matter if they want to or not. this is america we stand for freedom and liberty, damn it!

freedom. french fries. eagle.
Thanks from caconservative

Last edited by Sabcat; August 17th, 2016 at 04:48 AM.
Sabcat is online now  
Old August 17th, 2016, 12:15 PM   #3
Back to bum status
 
coke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: nunya
Posts: 12,561
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sabcat View Post
yeah, fuck those greedy businesses!!! we need to pass laws to force them to insure everyone. this is america. everybody has a right to the services that their business provides regardless if they can afford it or not. and fuck those selfish healthy people for not signing up for an inflated, over priced, watered down product.do they not understand that w/o them paying for this service that they don't need, then the greedy businesses cannot leverage their losses from the people who are over using the system by over charging the people who do not. those selfish pricks! don't they know that it is their duty as americans to subsidize the lives of the rest of society no matter if they want to or not. this is america we stand for freedom and liberty, damn it!

freedom. french fries. eagle.
The truth is that no one is saying is that the young, stupid and healthy have figured out that they do not have to pay the ACA penalty. Personally I have explained to several younger people how to not have insurance and not pay the penalty. It should be a choice and not a mandate from the government comrade. The millennials agree.
Thanks from Sabcat
coke is offline  
Old August 17th, 2016, 06:12 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: massachusetts
Posts: 7,619
Time to replace ObamaCare with HillaryCare (Single Payer)
goober is offline  
Old August 17th, 2016, 07:47 PM   #5
TW
 
Sabcat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Earth
Posts: 19,497
Quote:
Originally Posted by coke View Post
The truth is that no one is saying is that the young, stupid and healthy have figured out that they do not have to pay the ACA penalty. Personally I have explained to several younger people how to not have insurance and not pay the penalty. It should be a choice and not a mandate from the government comrade. The millennials agree.
as soon as at least 50% of the baby boomers die off we will be able to get rid of all the shit that they are voting for themselves. i am guessing sooner, ok hoping
Thanks from coke
Sabcat is online now  
Old August 17th, 2016, 09:43 PM   #6
Back to bum status
 
coke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: nunya
Posts: 12,561
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sabcat View Post
as soon as at least 50% of the baby boomers die off we will be able to get rid of all the shit that they are voting for themselves. i am guessing sooner, ok hoping
That is the truth. I think the baby boomers have been good at blaming millennials for all the free shit. I was actually thinking about Bernie Sanders and his campaign. Basically Bernie demonstrated that you can stand up, promise free stuff and win. The electorate has became so ignorant that they have no clue.
Thanks from Sabcat
coke is offline  
Old August 17th, 2016, 09:52 PM   #7
Back to bum status
 
coke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: nunya
Posts: 12,561
Quote:
Originally Posted by goober View Post
Time to replace ObamaCare with HillaryCare (Single Payer)
huh?
Quote:
Hillary Clinton's promise to save ObamaCare is laughable. Hillary Clinton is attacking rival Bernie Sanders, calling his plan to replace ObamaCare with a socialist single-payer system a “risky deal” and unaffordable. Instead, she says, Dems should back her so she can save ObamaCare.
Hillary Clinton?s promise to save ObamaCare is laughable | New York Post
Thanks from caconservative and Sabcat
coke is offline  
Reply

  Defending The Truth Political Forum > Political Issues > Healthcare

Tags
aca, coffin, nail



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
new book may be the final nail in the coffin for hillary.. kbear Politicians 5 May 12th, 2016 01:54 PM
Trail 'em, Nail 'em, Jail 'em intangible child Current Events 6 September 8th, 2015 03:12 PM
Oreilly hits the nail on the head. roastpork Current Events 10 August 24th, 2015 11:39 AM
More Nails in the Coffin of the Middle Class: LongWinded Current Events 5 April 27th, 2015 11:42 AM
Another nail in the USD coffin pana8 Current Events 18 December 5th, 2013 08:17 PM


Facebook Twitter RSS Feed



Copyright © 2005-2013 Defending The Truth. All rights reserved.