Political Forums  

Go Back   Defending The Truth Political Forum > Political Issues > Healthcare

Healthcare Healthcare Forum - For topics and discussions about health care, health policies, and health care systems


Thanks Tree97Thanks
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old April 29th, 2017, 06:39 PM   #61
Celebrating diversity
 
Sabcat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Earth
Posts: 21,067
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hollywood View Post
...Prove it.
Sabcat is online now  
Old April 29th, 2017, 07:21 PM   #62
Senior Member
 
Hollywood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Memphis, Tn.
Posts: 17,156
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sabcat View Post
I'm jealous of all the hair that fucker has!
Thanks from Sabcat
Hollywood is offline  
Old April 29th, 2017, 07:21 PM   #63
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: massachusetts
Posts: 8,215
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimmyb View Post
US healthcare is not the same as other countries and the Constitution does not allow it.
Wrong and Wrong.
goober is offline  
Old April 29th, 2017, 07:35 PM   #64
Commie Exposer
 
Jimmyb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Republic of Texas
Posts: 38,808
Quote:
Originally Posted by goober View Post
Wrong and Wrong.
The US has better outcomes and you can point out the clause in the Constitution that gives the federal government power over healthcare anytime you want.
Thanks from Jimgorn
Jimmyb is offline  
Old April 29th, 2017, 08:09 PM   #65
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: massachusetts
Posts: 8,215
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimmyb View Post
The US has better outcomes and you can point out the clause in the Constitution that gives the federal government power over healthcare anytime you want.
Jimmy, the US has outcomes that are similar to other nations, some better, some not as good.
Certainly not anything that is worth paying double for.
And we have government health care, that has been challenged in court and found constitutional.
Why don't you point out the clause the in the constitution that prohibits it.
Since the 1790's the federal government has been involved in health care, the founders were alive then, and had no issue with it, maybe they didn't have the deep understanding of the constitution that you possess....
goober is offline  
Old April 29th, 2017, 08:59 PM   #66
Commie Exposer
 
Jimmyb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Republic of Texas
Posts: 38,808
Quote:
Originally Posted by goober View Post
Jimmy, the US has outcomes that are similar to other nations, some better, some not as good.
Certainly not anything that is worth paying double for.
And we have government health care, that has been challenged in court and found constitutional.
Why don't you point out the clause the in the constitution that prohibits it.
Since the 1790's the federal government has been involved in health care, the founders were alive then, and had no issue with it, maybe they didn't have the deep understanding of the constitution that you possess....
The US has better outcomes than other countries.

The Constitution does not work that way. It has the powers granted, all others are prohibited.

The Founders were never involved in healthcare outside of their enumerated powers, and do not waste my time regarding the naval medica fund because that power is in Article I.
Thanks from Sabcat and Jimgorn
Jimmyb is offline  
Old April 30th, 2017, 03:28 AM   #67
Senior Member
 
iolo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Rhondda
Posts: 1,210
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimmyb View Post
The US has better outcomes and you can point out the clause in the Constitution that gives the federal government power over healthcare anytime you want.
You pay twice as much and leave out millions. surely you can see that you are out of your tiny mind to make such mad claims?
Thanks from Clara007
iolo is offline  
Old April 30th, 2017, 05:41 AM   #68
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: massachusetts
Posts: 8,215
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimmyb View Post
The US has better outcomes than other countries.

The Constitution does not work that way. It has the powers granted, all others are prohibited.

The Founders were never involved in healthcare outside of their enumerated powers, and do not waste my time regarding the naval medica fund because that power is in Article I.
So being 27th in Infant Mortality among the 27 wealthy countries is a "better outcome"?
Being 31st in longevity is a "Better Outcome"?

And the founders did not have a problem requiring the employees of private companies to pay for medical care. That wasn't a fund for the navy, it was required of the Merchant Marine, privately owned ships, engaged in private trade through US ports, that their employees pay into a fund to provide health care.

And the Supreme Court has found Medicare, and Obamacare constitutional.

Did you know that? Did you know that's the way the Constitution works?
Thanks from Hollywood and Clara007
goober is offline  
Old April 30th, 2017, 05:52 AM   #69
Senior Member
 
Hollywood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Memphis, Tn.
Posts: 17,156
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimmyb View Post
The US has better outcomes than other countries.

The Constitution does not work that way. It has the powers granted, all others are prohibited.

The Founders were never involved in healthcare outside of their enumerated powers, and do not waste my time regarding the naval medica fund because that power is in Article I.
That's what Goober said, just more reasonably. We have results similar o other countries, some better, some not as good. Why do you seem to have a problem with that statement?

The ACA was found Constitutional by the CURRENT SCOTUS, the fact that you THINK previous Courts would not have approved is completely irrelevant.

There's a good reason it's called the SUPREME Court of the United States and NOT the pretty-damn-important-court.
Thanks from Clara007
Hollywood is offline  
Old April 30th, 2017, 05:55 AM   #70
Senior Member
 
Hollywood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Memphis, Tn.
Posts: 17,156
Quote:
Originally Posted by goober View Post
So being 27th in Infant Mortality among the 27 wealthy countries is a "better outcome"?
Being 31st in longevity is a "Better Outcome"?

And the founders did not have a problem requiring the employees of private companies to pay for medical care. That wasn't a fund for the navy, it was required of the Merchant Marine, privately owned ships, engaged in private trade through US ports, that their employees pay into a fund to provide health care.

And the Supreme Court has found Medicare, and Obamacare constitutional.

Did you know that? Did you know that's the way the Constitution works?
WELL!!! Everybody is just WONG, the Constitution should work the way an anonymous guy on the internet SAYS it should because............well, because he SAYS so and he should know because he's smarter than ANYONE!!!
Just ask him.
Thanks from Clara007
Hollywood is offline  
Reply

  Defending The Truth Political Forum > Political Issues > Healthcare

Tags
medicine, owns, socialized, state



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
So now that we have socialized medicine... Sabcat Healthcare 1 February 4th, 2017 02:45 PM
Welcome to Socialized Medicine. roastpork Healthcare 4 May 20th, 2014 05:01 AM
Welcome to Socialized Medicine roastpork Current Events 41 May 9th, 2014 03:59 PM
Medicine, Socialized intangible child Healthcare 32 April 15th, 2013 02:45 PM
Socialized Medicine = obamaDOESN'Tcare JestMe Socialism 38 December 7th, 2012 07:04 AM


Facebook Twitter RSS Feed



Copyright © 2005-2013 Defending The Truth. All rights reserved.