Political Forums  

Go Back   Defending The Truth Political Forum > Political Forum > Political Ideologies > Liberalism

Liberalism Liberalism Forum - Political Philosophy Forum


Thanks Tree40Thanks
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old June 27th, 2013, 05:32 AM   #11
Banned
 
Uncle Han's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: HK
Posts: 1,233
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nwolfe35 View Post
You would be wrong.

I'm against "Obamacare", Affirmative Action and Big Government in general. I support a flat tax or fair tax, personal responsibility and individual freedom.
Those are good things......what about the social issues and economics?

Last edited by Uncle Han; June 27th, 2013 at 08:29 AM.
Uncle Han is offline  
Old June 27th, 2013, 05:44 AM   #12
Banned
 
poet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 6,065
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tony View Post
Because they have little else to do.
No. We have lots to do...but we can always make time to hip you to the reality. You are racists, homophobes, bigots who think that you're entitled to "special treatment" which includes "pointing fingers" at others, especially minorities, and getting indignant when fingers are pointed back at you.
You're not the Grand Pubas, Wizards, and rocket scientists you thought you once were. You're miscreants, misfits, cretins and arrogant SOB's who will continue to get their "chains yanked" by the responsible left.
poet is offline  
Old June 27th, 2013, 05:53 AM   #13
Banned
 
poet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 6,065
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nwolfe35 View Post
You would be wrong.

I'm against "Obamacare", Affirmative Action and Big Government in general. I support a flat tax or fair tax, personal responsibility and individual freedom.
I'm for "Obamacare" because it curtails the excesses and profit margins of the insurance, drug and healthcare industries, who have increased their coffers at the expense of American taxpayers and consumers, and who "woo" lawmakers with "perks and kickbacks" to pass legislation and reduce regulations which are favorable only to them and their interests, at the expense of the American public.
Affirmative Action is still needed because many "white" employers practice "favoritism", "cronyism", and "nepotism", in their hiring and firing practices, and promotions. And government is necessary to prevent people from falling through the cracks.
A fair tax is a good thing....however the wealthy should pay more because they have more, and can easily afford to do so. Greed is not pretty.
Personal responsibility is not a Republican/conservative "badge of honor". Liberals/Democrats are all for "personal responsibility"...which others have removed the concept of "compassion for one's fellow man (a teaching of Christ, actually) from.
Thanks from Camelot
poet is offline  
Old June 27th, 2013, 06:01 AM   #14
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: america
Posts: 1,163
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nwolfe35 View Post
You would be wrong.

I'm against "Obamacare", Affirmative Action and Big Government in general. I support a flat tax or fair tax, personal responsibility and individual freedom.
then why side with a liberal? they want the government to control everything including personal responsibility and individual freedom. I'm not trying to be an asshole to you because libertarians should never fight libertarians. libertarians need to stick together to fight the 2 party illusion.
sovereignman is offline  
Old June 27th, 2013, 06:02 AM   #15
Banned
 
poet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 6,065
Quote:
Originally Posted by sovereignman View Post
then why side with a liberal? they want the government to control everything including personal responsibility and individual freedom. I'm not trying to be an asshole to you because libertarians should never fight libertarians. libertarians need to stick together to fight the 2 party illusion.
Patently untrue.
Thanks from Camelot
poet is offline  
Old June 27th, 2013, 06:10 AM   #16
Banned
 
Truth Detector's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Ventura CA
Posts: 7,515
Quote:
Originally Posted by poet View Post
No. We have lots to do...but we can always make time to hip you to the reality. You are racists, homophobes, bigots who think that you're entitled to "special treatment" which includes "pointing fingers" at others, especially minorities, and getting indignant when fingers are pointed back at you.
You're not the Grand Pubas, Wizards, and rocket scientists you thought you once were. You're miscreants, misfits, cretins and arrogant SOB's who will continue to get their "chains yanked" by the responsible left.
More race baiting from the idiot who cried racist. Do you have any other mode than stupid?

I guess it is what one can expect from the ideology of losers and economic ignorance.
Truth Detector is offline  
Old June 27th, 2013, 06:13 AM   #17
Mayor of Realville
 
webguy4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Michigan
Posts: 15,841
liberals think "tolerant" means getting along with people who agree with them.
Thanks from Truth Detector
webguy4 is offline  
Old June 27th, 2013, 06:18 AM   #18
Talent on loan from god
 
Camelot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Ohio
Posts: 27,513
Quote:
Originally Posted by webguy4 View Post
liberals think "tolerant" means getting along with people who agree with them.
Quote:
. Powell blasts GOP's "dark vein of intolerance"

Former Secretary of State Colin Powell, a Republican who crossed party lines to endorse President Obama in 2008 and 2012, scalded his party for harboring a "dark vein of intolerance" Sunday, saying the GOP "has to take a very hard look at itself."

There is a "dark vein of intolerance in some parts of the party," Powell said on NBC's "Meet the Press." "What do I mean by that? What I mean by that is they still sort of look down on minorities."

As evidence, Powell pointed to a number of statements that were directed at Mr. Obama during the campaign by Republicans - statements that he believes were racially motivated.

"When I see a former governor say that the president is 'shuckin' and jivin'.' That's a racial era slave-term," Powell said of Sarah Palin's description of the president's response to the attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya.

He also took issue with former New Hampshire Gov. John Sununu's characterization of the president as "lazy" following a tepid performance in the first presidential debate.

"He didn't say he was slow, he was tired, he didn't do well. He said he was 'lazy.' Now, it may not mean anything to most Americans," Powell said, "but to those of us who are African-Americans, the second word is 'shiftless,' and then there's a third word that goes along with it."

Powell also singled out the "birther movement" for criticism, expressing amazement that Republicans have not excommunicated the fringe conspiracy theorists from the party.

"The whole birther movement: Why do senior Republicans tolerate this kind of discussion within the party?" Powell asked, counseling the party to "take a look at itself."

Powell noted, "I'm a moderate, but I'm still a Republican," and fretted that his party may soon be facing obsolescence if it does not reorient itself.

Poll: Dems again edge GOP in party affiliation
Repairing the Republican Party
"In recent years, there's been a significant shift to the right" on the part of the GOP, Powell said, "And we have seen what that shift has produced: two losing presidential campaigns. I think what the Republican Party needs to do now is take a very hard look at itself and understand that the country has changed. The country is changing demographically, and if the Republican Party does not change along with that demographic, they're going to be in trouble."

And Powell argued that the problem is more message than messenger - beyond public relations and optics to the Republican platform itself - and advised the GOP to moderate its stance on education, immigration, and climate change to attract new voters.

"Everybody wants to talk about, 'Who's going to be the candidate?'" Powell said. "You've got to think first about what's the party actually going to represent. If it's just going to represent the far right wing of the political spectrum, I think the party is in difficulty."
x

Powell blasts GOP's "dark vein of intolerance" - Political Eye - CBS News
Thanks from poet

Last edited by Camelot; June 27th, 2013 at 06:20 AM.
Camelot is online now  
Old June 27th, 2013, 06:23 AM   #19
Banned
 
poet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 6,065
Quote:
Originally Posted by Truth Detector View Post
More race baiting from the idiot who cried racist. Do you have any other mode than stupid?

I guess it is what one can expect from the ideology of losers and economic ignorance.
LOL. Newsflash. Racists and bigots can't call others 'racists and bigots' with any authority or credibility, by definition, you cretin.
Losers and economic ignorance? You don't know me, yet you pretend that you do....ad nauseam. I've owned you from the beginning, but you're too stupid to know when to quit.
Blacks can't race bait, simpleton. Calling race-baiting and the notion of "playing the race card" are the oldest and lamest tactics in the white racist playbook...because it suggests that you, a white racist, knows better what constitutes "racism", than I, a black man, who has been on the receiving end of said racism. You don't.
And whomever throws up "race-baiting" or "playing the race card", has, in fact, revealed themselves as bona fide, card-carrying racists. Blacks can't very well play a card they wear on their bodies, that can be seen from a distance. Slug.
poet is offline  
Old June 27th, 2013, 06:23 AM   #20
Banned
 
Truth Detector's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Ventura CA
Posts: 7,515
Quote:
Originally Posted by poet View Post
I'm for "Obamacare" because it curtails the excesses and profit margins of the insurance, drug and healthcare industries, who have increased their coffers at the expense of American taxpayers and consumers, and who "woo" lawmakers with "perks and kickbacks" to pass legislation and reduce regulations which are favorable only to them and their interests, at the expense of the American public.
Affirmative Action is still needed because many "white" employers practice "favoritism", "cronyism", and "nepotism", in their hiring and firing practices, and promotions. And government is necessary to prevent people from falling through the cracks.
A fair tax is a good thing....however the wealthy should pay more because they have more, and can easily afford to do so. Greed is not pretty.
Personal responsibility is not a Republican/conservative "badge of honor". Liberals/Democrats are all for "personal responsibility"...which others have removed the concept of "compassion for one's fellow man (a teaching of Christ, actually) from.
In other words, you support massive government activism based on incredibly false idealistic views not based in any reality.

But government activism extracts a high cost from those willing to subjugate themselves at its alter; liberty, freedom and choice.

Big liberal Government has not helped the black community. It has enslaved them with an entitlement and victim mentality.

So far under the great black President who wallows in this failed ideology, blacks have never been worse off and things are not getting any better economically for them.

As for those "white" employers who practice nepotism, what of all those "black" employers who do the same?

But here is the reality check for the black community with this entitlement/victim mentality walking around with big chips on their shoulders, as an employer, no one wants to risk hiring a black if they are going to be sued as racists trying to fire them for a lack of productivity. Businesses are not a charity. They have a right to expect employees to meet a specific work standard and if it is not met, have a right to fire you for ANY cause.

If employees don't like those work requirements, they are FREE to seek work somewhere that treats them the way they expect to be treated.

If you think that you can force companies to be a work charity through big government activism, then expect higher unemployment rates in the future as capital and business go elsewhere where the business environment is more favorable to profit making.

Last edited by Truth Detector; June 27th, 2013 at 06:26 AM.
Truth Detector is offline  
Reply

  Defending The Truth Political Forum > Political Forum > Political Ideologies > Liberalism

Tags
disagreement, explain, issues, liberals, personal



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Imaginethat's Modern Monetary Theory Disagreement Fayt Debt 180 March 31st, 2013 10:09 AM
Perhaps Penn & Teller can better explain it to the liberals sgtdmski Gun Control 1 April 19th, 2011 01:43 AM
$250 million for abstinence ed fuels disagreement CNN Current Events 6 April 1st, 2010 10:58 AM
King: Clashes in Iran, disagreement in U.S. CNN Current Events 1 June 22nd, 2009 05:27 AM


Facebook Twitter RSS Feed



Copyright © 2005-2013 Defending The Truth. All rights reserved.