Political Forums  

Go Back   Defending The Truth Political Forum > Political Forum > Political Ideologies > Liberalism

Liberalism Liberalism Forum - Political Philosophy Forum


Thanks Tree2Thanks
  • 1 Post By Sabcat
  • 1 Post By BubbaJones
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old May 4th, 2016, 06:16 PM   #1
Celebrating diversity
 
Sabcat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Earth
Posts: 21,024
The Duality of a Libertarian: Intrapersonal vs. Interpersonal Ethics

The general libertarian population operates and makes value judgements according to two different ethical principles. The first principle is what makes a libertarian, a libertarian: namely, the non-aggression principle. This is an interpersonal ethic that guides both how we interact with others and how we morally judge the actions of others. It is an incredibly simple standard that leaves massive leeway for a variety of individual action. This principle quite simply holds that no individual should aggress against the person or property of any other individual, ever, period. The only exception to this is retaliatory action in response to an overt, aggressive act. This is the ethic on which we base our entire political philosophy. It makes no assertions regarding what the proper way to experience life is, but merely says that however one proceeds in their existence, it cannot involve aggression against others, period.

Most (not all) libertarians also have what I call an intrapersonal ethic-an ethic that guides how they behave in day-to-day lived experiences. This ethic involves some conception of what the “good life” entails and how one should go about pursuing it. This personal philosophy can take many forms, from religions like Protestant Christianity to existentialism to secular humanism to Islam or any other life philosophy one can imagine. We do not advocate for the use of coercive force to make others adhere to this life philosophy because we recognize the pluralistic nature of humanity. Because we acknowledge that each individual is unique, with their own set of unique circumstances and experiences, we recognize that conceptions of the good life will vary wildly from person to person. Some may even fully believe they have discovered the one true, proper good life and attempt to convince others of this notion, but they will never violate the higher intrapersonal ethic of non-aggression in doing so. Thus, the duality of libertarianism that puzzles so many is established: we have one set of guiding principles for how we judge human-to-human interaction, and an entirely different set of principles lighting the path we take in our own personal walk through existence.

This explains the seeming paradox of people like my dear friend Anja. Anja is a devout Christian who fully believes that salvation through Christ and attempting to follow Him as closely as possible is the one and only way to achieve the good life. This means she does not accept, participate in, or condone a variety of currently illegal or heavily regulated activities like prostitution, drug use, pornography, stripping, and even gay marriage. However, she simultaneously would advocate for all of these activities to be perfectly legal and entirely unregulated because she recognizes that to make them illegal or heavily regulated would violate the non-aggression principle and the very right to self-ownership that every human being should enjoy. She would never participate in any of these activities, and would even actively campaign against individuals participating in them with great vigor; however, she does not advocate for the state to use its coercive monopoly on force to stop these activities at the point of a gun because none of these activities she considers illicit are actually, tangibly aggressing against the person or property of another human being. Thus, she follows the intrapersonal ethic of her Christianity by actively lobbying against these activities whilst also simultaneously following her interpersonal ethic by recognizing the freedom of individuals to participate in them as they please.



read the rest here



https://againsthestate.liberty.me/th...rsonal-ethics/
Thanks from coke
Sabcat is offline  
Old May 5th, 2016, 05:01 AM   #2
Senior Member
 
BubbaJones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Middle Tennessee
Posts: 5,849
Almost every society has some version of the golden rule.

"Treat others the way you want to be treated".

I don't need government, religion, philosophy or anything else to tell me what's right or wrong. I simply have to live by this one simple concept. If I don't want my property stolen, then I don't steal other peoples property. If you steal my property, you have caused me harm and I will find some way of balancing the scales. As long as your activities have no negative impact on my life, I truly don't care how you choose to live yours. As long as what I do has no negative impact on your life, you have no cause to restrict my activities.

This truly is the one absolute truth in the world. Too bad it's so routinely ignored.
Thanks from Sabcat
BubbaJones is offline  
Reply

  Defending The Truth Political Forum > Political Forum > Political Ideologies > Liberalism

Tags
duality, ethics, interpersonal, intrapersonal, libertarian



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
On the Duality of Light RNG Science and Technology 1 March 3rd, 2015 01:20 PM
Ethics complaints still dog Palin CNN Current Events 1 July 9th, 2009 09:55 AM
Dieting & Ideology: Delusional Duality? coberst Philosophy 0 April 15th, 2009 11:29 AM
Morals and Ethics Ave Gloria Dei Philosophy 2 June 5th, 2007 08:26 AM
The downhill slide of Ethics Rod Philosophy 3 January 20th, 2007 04:51 AM


Facebook Twitter RSS Feed



Copyright © 2005-2013 Defending The Truth. All rights reserved.