Political Forums  

Go Back   Defending The Truth Political Forum > Political Forum > Political Talk

Political Talk Political Talk Forum - Discuss and debate politics


Thanks Tree44Thanks
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old June 23rd, 2017, 11:19 AM   #51
Have you seen my Iguana
 
Sabcat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Earth
Posts: 22,971
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hollywood View Post
Hey, you're the one that called him a troll. I usually just call him a dumbfuck.
What? One can engage in trolling WITHOUT being a troll?

God-damn right kid, I'm cute as all hell. Problem?
As i said you dont understand. It is cute when old people get confused. They are like toddlers.
Sabcat is offline  
Old June 23rd, 2017, 11:22 AM   #52
Senior Member
 
Hollywood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Memphis, Tn.
Posts: 19,610
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sabcat View Post
As i said you dont understand. It is cute when old people get confused. They are like toddlers.
You do not refute a thing i said, do you?
And we both know why.
Thanks from foundit66
Hollywood is online now  
Old June 23rd, 2017, 11:29 AM   #53
Banned
 
League of Justice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Mood Indigo
Posts: 296
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sabcat View Post
As i said you dont understand. It is cute when old people get confused. They are like toddlers.

He isn't alone on this thread either. There's a coven of 'em.
Thanks from Sabcat
League of Justice is offline  
Old June 23rd, 2017, 11:35 AM   #54
Have you seen my Iguana
 
Sabcat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Earth
Posts: 22,971
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hollywood View Post
You do not refute a thing i said, do you?
And we both know why.
There is no need to. People who are reading this understand and the others (like you) who do not will continue to look foolish. I'm sure it's mostly a generational thing. My grandpa still gets excited by what he sees on the TV too, granted we can show him the same thing again in like 20 min and get the same reaction. Its cute.
Sabcat is offline  
Old June 23rd, 2017, 11:41 AM   #55
Spud
 
foundit66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: California
Posts: 5,934
Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by League of Justice View Post
There never were tapes. Trump playing the MSM like a Stradivarius. Now, did the deep state record?
Trump made a bluff that nobody believed and you think others were played for chumps?


Tell me.
What did Trump's bluff actually achieve?


Did it scare Comey from testifying?
Comey wished there were tapes. So do I.
But some people seem to blindly believe anything Trump says or tweets has intrinsic intelligence...


Quote:
Originally Posted by Hollywood View Post
You do not refute a thing i said, do you?
And we both know why.
For some people on this forum, that's obviously their "method" of "debating".
To not debate and to try to endlessly mock others. Cause they themselves have nothing of worth to add in the first place...

Sabcat only trick is slight variations on the "you don't know what you're talking about" riff, while being thoroughly incapable of actually showing that to be actually true...
Thanks from Camelot and Clara007

Last edited by foundit66; June 23rd, 2017 at 11:44 AM.
foundit66 is offline  
Old June 23rd, 2017, 11:55 AM   #56
Talent on loan from god
 
Camelot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Ohio
Posts: 25,394
Well, the Orange Turd's "tape" comment led to Comey's release of his notes which led to a special prosecutor. The Orange Turd and his minions are BRILLIANT I tell you.....LOL
Camelot is offline  
Old June 23rd, 2017, 12:03 PM   #57
Have you seen my Iguana
 
Sabcat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Earth
Posts: 22,971
Quote:
Originally Posted by foundit66 View Post
Trump made a bluff that nobody believed and you think others were played for chumps?


Tell me.
What did Trump's bluff actually achieve?


Did it scare Comey from testifying?
Comey wished there were tapes. So do I.
But some people seem to blindly believe anything Trump says or tweets has intrinsic intelligence...



For some people on this forum, that's obviously their "method" of "debating".
To not debate and to try to endlessly mock others. Cause they themselves have nothing of worth to add in the first place...

Sabcat only trick is slight variations on the "you don't know what you're talking about" riff, while being thoroughly incapable of actually showing that to be actually true...


From the guy who i have polished on more than one occasion

Kisses potato head

Nobody debates HW. He is literally retarded.

You on the other hand just run around in circles w/ wordy pointless posts.
Thanks from League of Justice
Sabcat is offline  
Old June 23rd, 2017, 12:53 PM   #58
Spud
 
foundit66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: California
Posts: 5,934
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sabcat View Post
From the guy who i have polished on more than one occasion
I thought we weren't going to talk about those things you did for me...
< end sarcasm >


Quote:
Originally Posted by Sabcat View Post
Nobody debates HW. He is literally retarded.You on the other hand just run around in circles w/ wordy pointless posts.
ROFLMAO!
Once again, you try to defer a pattern you present onto somebody else.
YOU are not debating. Instead, these repeated mindless ad hominem tactics.
It doesn't matter the target. You find some excuse for your emotional drivel regardless of who the target is.
Thanks from RNG
foundit66 is offline  
Old June 23rd, 2017, 01:14 PM   #59
Spud
 
foundit66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: California
Posts: 5,934
Jesus Christ.
The man just babbles like an idiot trying to defend stupid lies.
"Big news today, you didn't—you said you didn't tape James Comey," said Fox's Ainsley Earhardt. "Do you want to explain that? Why did you want him to believe that you possibly did that?"

Trump answered:

"Well, I didn't tape him, uh, you never know what's happening when you see the Obama administration perhaps longer than that was doing all of this unmasking and surveillance. And you read all about it, and I've been reading about it for the last couple of months, about the seriousness of the—and horrible—situation with the surveillance all over the place, and you've been hearing the word 'unmasking,' a word you've probably never heard before. So you never know what's out there. But I didn't tape, and I don't have any tape, and I didn't tape. But when he found out that I—that there may be tapes out there—whether it's governmental tapes or anything else—and who knows—uh, I think his story may have changed. I mean, you'll have to take a look at that, because then he has to tell what actually took place at the events. And my story didn't change, my story was always a straight story, my story was always the truth. But you'll have to determine for yourself whether or not his story changed. But I did not tape."
Watch Trump Explain Why He Sent Comey-Tapes Tweet and See If You Understand (We Don't)

So, looking at the question asked, Trump actually tries to argue (in an incredibly non-coherent form) that because of Obama wire-tapping (which Comey already knew was a lie so it was a stupid counter-allegation), Trump was going to bluff on TRUMP having tapes?


No Trump.
No story changed after you said that.

And I have to laugh at the idiotic "But you'll have to determine for yourself whether or not his story changed"
Too many times I have heard that excuse thrown out there when an indefensible claim exists that you just hope somebody else will "judge for themselves" in contradiction to the actual facts.
Thanks from Clara007
foundit66 is offline  
Old June 23rd, 2017, 01:52 PM   #60
Senior Member
 
Bookworm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,718
Quote:
Originally Posted by foundit66 View Post
So, looking at the question asked, Trump actually tries to argue (in an incredibly non-coherent form) that because of Obama wire-tapping (which Comey already knew was a lie so it was a stupid counter-allegation), Trump was going to bluff on TRUMP having tapes?
Again, as I've said before, and as Trump just explained, he NEVER claimed that he himself had tapes. The bluff was that a third party might have tapes, which Trump probably still thinks is a possibility. Then when people started asking if HE had then, he got all theatrically suspenseful, which was stupid. But he did tell reporters they were going to be disappointed when they found out the truth because he knew reporters were hoping he had turned into some sort of Nixon clone, which he hadn't.
Bookworm is offline  
Reply

  Defending The Truth Political Forum > Political Forum > Political Talk

Tags
tapes, trump



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Where Are the Ukrainian Air Traffic Control Tapes excalibur Current Events 10 July 25th, 2014 07:05 PM
More Nixon tapes to be made public CNN Current Events 2 June 23rd, 2009 10:41 AM
CIA destroyed 92 interview tapes intangible child Political Talk 5 March 3rd, 2009 05:13 PM
Papers: 92 interrogation tapes destroyed by CIA CNN Current Events 1 March 2nd, 2009 06:51 PM
Bush: 'No recollection' of tapes CNN Current Events 1 December 8th, 2007 07:14 AM


Facebook Twitter RSS Feed



Copyright © 2005-2013 Defending The Truth. All rights reserved.