Political Forums  

Go Back   Defending The Truth Political Forum > Political Forum > Political Talk

Political Talk Political Talk Forum - Discuss and debate politics


Thanks Tree7Thanks
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old June 5th, 2018, 11:22 AM   #1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: East Coast Of U.S.A.
Posts: 155
Miss Bow-Wow 2.0

FOX News should have dumped Gretchen Carlson instead of Roger Ailes. You know that touchy-feely dogs will become the face of American women in the future.


The Miss America Organization has announced an end to the swimsuit portion of its competition, and will no longer judge contestants specifically on their outward appearance.

Gretchen Carlson, who was crowned Miss America in 1989, made the announcement of the new direction on Tuesday’s broadcast of Good Morning America, CNBC reported.

Branding the pageant “Miss America 2.0,” Carlson said, “We’re not going to judge you on your appearance because we are interested in what makes you you.”

Carlson, the latest head of the pageant’s board of directors, added that many contestants expressed criticism of the swimsuit and evening gown portion of the pageant in this day of a heightened awareness of sexual harassment.

Carlson, who filed a sexual harassment suit against Fox News Chairman Roger Ailes precipitating his departure from the network, added that some contestants told pageant officials, “We don’t want to be out there in high heels and swimsuits,” in this era of #MeToo awareness.
Miss America Organization Drops Swimsuit Competition
Warner Todd Huston
5 Jun 2018

Miss America Organization Drops Swimsuit Competition | Breitbart
Television made beauty pageants. Very few Americans ever saw a Miss America contest before television.

Today, television’s entertainment and news audience is female by a wide margin. I have no proof of this, but I suspect that 75 percent of men do not watch television other than sports. The question is how long will it take for advertisers to realize they are not reaching men? It is going to get worse for advertisers; especially on FOX that turned left three years ago. Hard left rudder is not much different than 25 degrees left rudder:


Fox News Lurches Left as Murdoch’s Sons Take Control of Media Dynasty
By Jerry A. Kane
August 10, 2015

http://canadafreepress.com/article/74409
FOX programs its own version of the Fairness Doctrine by supplying more conservative ears to liberal talking points than does the alphabet networks combined.

FOX’s rating are high because liberals also watch FOX, while conservatives do not watch overtly liberal networks. FOX has fooled a substantial audience into believing it is the voice of conservative values. If you listen closely you will see that FOX’s conservative values always come down on the side of the New World Order’s agenda; big government, global government, the United Nations, and every other policy that true conservatives oppose.

The TV viewing public should have a choice between a conservative network, and a liberal network. Note that conservative talk radio thrives, while liberal talk radio tanks every time.

Incidentally, FOX does what it does for the money. High ratings bring in the most TAX DEDUCTIBLE advertising dollars.

FOX was always a network dominated by off-camera liberals. On-camera FOX phonies hid behind “Fair & Balanced.”

When defending America’s sovereignty becomes the first priority in immigration the process of deporting millions would speedup immensely.

Incidentally, liberals whine that the American people will not tolerate deporting millions of illegal aliens, yet you never hear a media mouth defend the things the American people are being forced to accept in addition to the illegal immigration mess. The sniffling I enjoy the most is the one that says deporting anchor babies “Is not the kind of country we are.” Not rewarding illegal aliens regardless of how they got here is exactly the kind of country this is.

Were it not for the Fairness Doctrine’s last stronghold on FOX, the Democrat Party’s collectivist message would be heard by less than two percent of Americans who take the time to stay informed. I cannot see that number improving because FOX liberals moved up to the top of the pecking order.

Channel surfing stunned me when I saw Juan Williams pop up more than usual. I am outta there whenever I see him, but his demeanor in a few seconds told me that those few legitimate journalists on panels have to treat him with the same respect liberals get on the alphabet networks.

Just to be fair, Williams never hid his loyalty to the Democrat Party’s agenda. Williams always turned my stomach, but to other conservatives he has to be worse than the other FOX liberals because he is the most well-known.

Incidentally, I always sensed that Brit Hume was the one guy who never would roll over for FOX liberals whenever they laid down crapola. Juan Williams will get worse now that his new bosses have his back; so it will be interesting to see if Hume holds Williams’ feet to the fire.

Take my word for this: I have decades of experience analyzing media lies and liars going all the way back to Walter Cronkite’s years as CBS anchor. I never had another reason to watch television; so I feel more than qualified to question media.

Ask yourself why liberals defend the media? Before you answer be certain you did not believe anything you heard that the Administration and FOX engaging in a death struggle. If you believe that lie you must also believe that FOX turned hard left because conservatism is in decline.

Networks never did defend America’s sovereignty; nor did media mouths ever report anything that exposes the New World Order’s activities on behalf of a global government administered by the United Nations. Every single story that puts Socialism’s/Communism’s global agenda in jeopardy is either ignored or twisted beyond recognition. Immigration is a classic media newspeak.

Media mouths talk about a path to citizenship as though that is the right thing to do, but they never say why the borders remain open.

Media’s defense of everything Americans detest works so well because networks can report story after story that poses no threat to the global government, etc. Reporting “safe stories” whitewashes the filth they hide. Hell, safe stories like murder, non-existent racism, a shooting, plane crashes, natural disasters, and so on, make media mouths look like they love an independent America all to pieces.

Somebody should tell FOX that this does not apply to television:


Never pick a fight with people who buy ink by the barrel. Mark Twain
Everybody buys their own ink on the Internet.

Check this story from 2015 if you doubt media’s left-leaning proclivities. Every press baron should be in this picture:



A CNN story blared, “The American stock market has surrendered a stunning $2.1 trillion of value in just the last six days of market chaos.” The ups and downs of the stock market have been seized upon by those leading a global campaign to steal trillions of dollars from the American people in the name of “sustainable development.”

One aspect of the campaign is a so-called “financial transaction tax,” endorsed by socialist and presidential candidate Bernie Sanders (I-VT), which would even affect the stock trades of small investors. The proposal has a global component.

However, the odds are that you will only be treated to positive coverage of this unfolding scheme to “redistribute the wealth” on a global basis. George Russell of Fox News broke the story of how a branch of media giant Thomson Reuters and the United Nations Foundation are training journalists and paying for stories to “popularize” the U.N.-sponsored Sustainable Development Goals and make them attractive to news consumers.
Paying the Media for Pro-U.N. Coverage
By Cliff Kincaid
August 28, 2015

https://www.aim.org/aim-column/payin...-u-n-coverage/
QUESTION: How come television honors the promise print press gave to bankers in the early 1950s?

"We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years.”

“It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supernational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national autodetermination practiced in past centuries." David Rockefeller, Bilderberg meeting 1991

http://vigilantcitizen.com/latestnew...eve-in-cabals/
Pax Americana (noun)

A state of relative international peace regarded as overseen by the US (or the UK).
David Rockefeller (1915 – 2017) and his bankers wrapped themselves in the flag with a Pax Americana image. They cannot have it both ways. The record shows that globalism and open-borders are bringing the world closer to world war and violent revolution.

Speaking for myself, I am one archconservative who does not give a flying F about the rest of the planet. Let the rest of the world go straight to hell as far as I am concerned. This is my Pax Americana:


Commerce with all nations, alliance with none, should be our motto. Thomas Jefferson

I am for free commerce with all nations, political connection with none, and little or no diplomatic establishment. And I am not for linking ourselves by new treaties with the quarrels of Europe, entering that field of slaughter to preserve their balance, or joining in the confederacy of Kings to war against the principles of liberty. Thomas Jefferson to Elbridge Gerry, 1799. ME 10:77
The minute you move away from T. J.’s caution you open the door to every priest and wannabe priest. Every freak that ever lived wanted to save the world. In truth, they save everything except individual liberties.

Take a look at television’s serious stuff.

The electronic press is an instrument of propaganda; so is print press when it leans one way or the other. A free press is supposed to keep the public informed so that Americans can protect themselves from the incremental evils inherent in big government. During the 1960 presidential campaigns both print and electronic media abandoned their reason for their existence. Both conspired to defeat Richard Nixon —— then ignore the theft after JFK stole the election. A few years later “America’s most trusted man.” anchorman Walter Cronkite, went foreign when he declared the war in Vietnam was lost when it was not.

Print press and television repeatedly warned us about the Right's attack on our individual liberties, while they promoted, and continue to promote, a devastating attack from the Left. That specific free press betrayal was pooh-poohed away when MEDIA trivialized betrayal as a harmless left-leaning bias.

The Fifth Estate —— TELEVISION —— is the fifth branch of government. Whether or not print press leans Left or Right they both advocate bigger government and more control over private sector citizens.

Electronic news and entertainment clearly promote bigger government. Analyze the dialogue in lawyer shows, cop shows, doctor shows, teacher shows, etc., and you will see what I mean.

As far as electronic news organizations go: I need not cite examples. They are all jokes told by well-paid liars reading a script —— if you want to be accurate about it the lies are told by extremely well-paid propagandists.

Here are a few ways that laymen can tell the electronic press does not have First Amendment protection:

1. The government can and did ban tobacco ads on TV and radio but could not touch the print press. Tobacco products are still advertised in print. If the general public's health is the government's reason for banning electronic tobacco ads, I have to conclude that the health of Americans who read newspapers and magazines are not included in the government's concerns.

2. Anti-tobacco forces went to court trying to restrict print press tobacco ads to black and white only. There was no photography or color when the Constitution was written. Political cartoons have more First Amendment protection than does photography which has no protection at all when push comes to shove. Political cartoons were the only "pictures" being published at the time the Constitution was written. I do not recall how much coverage FOX gave to that case.

3. Campaign finance reform laws did not touch print press before Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, nor will it should Citizens United be repealed. Those in government know that TV is infinitely more influential than print. No matter how Citizens United goes in the future, the government can live with print press rather than create a constitutional crisis. At the same time the federal government is acquiring even more control over the electronic press than they now exercise through the Ministry of Propaganda (FCC). You will note that both print and the majority electronic press advocate the Democrat Party’s position on campaign finance laws for reasons of their own. The electronic press does as Democrats tell them to do.

4. When a congressional committee summons network heads to testify, they show up on bended knee. If a congressional committee summoned publishers, they would tell that committee where to go in hurry. The fact is that networks and newspapers rely upon tax deductible advertising dollars. However, newspaper publishers must defend their First Amendment Right in order to keep the government from diminishing that Right as it surely will at the first opportunity. Network parasites only have to protect their advertising tax exempt incomes.

Finally, media tells Americans they have an obligation to save the world with Socialism’s collectivism; i.e. the tax collector’s morality.

Last edited by Flanders111; June 6th, 2018 at 05:33 AM.
Flanders111 is offline  
Old June 6th, 2018, 05:13 AM   #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: East Coast Of U.S.A.
Posts: 155
After looking at images of shapely women in swim suits:

VIDEO ▼


Miss America dropping swimsuit competition| Latest News Videos | Fox News

I now understand why bow-wows are overjoyed with the new rule. Mutts cannot wear bathing suits because they are hung like pea coat sleeves.
Flanders111 is offline  
Old June 6th, 2018, 07:48 AM   #3
Senior Member
 
Clara007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Arizona
Posts: 10,639
I have know some pretty disgusting MEN in my time, but, BUSTER---

YOU TAKE THE CAKE!
Thanks from Lyzza and Flanders111
Clara007 is offline  
Old June 6th, 2018, 08:37 AM   #4
Senior Member
 
Kate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,702
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clara007 View Post
I have know some pretty disgusting MEN in my time, but, BUSTER---

YOU TAKE THE CAKE!
I think it's funny. The body is part of the competition, leaving it out of a beauty contest? Just silly.
Kate is offline  
Old June 6th, 2018, 08:43 AM   #5
I'm debt free
 
TNVolunteer73's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Lebanon, TN
Posts: 36,150
Who cares I never watched Miss America since I was a kid and that was because we only had 1 TV and my mom would watch it.
TNVolunteer73 is offline  
Old June 6th, 2018, 09:06 AM   #6
Senior Member
 
Clara007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Arizona
Posts: 10,639
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kate View Post
I think it's funny. The body is part of the competition, leaving it out of a beauty contest? Just silly.


What is up with you, Kate? You have no problem with men calling women "bow-wows" and "Mutts"? Touchy-feely dogs?

Have you MISSED the decades of young women starving themselves? Literally dying to be thin and beautiful? Basing their self-worth on their bodies--their beauty (or lack of it)?

Beauty pageants are antiquated institutions and should have been disposed of long ago. The very fact that they had mostly male judges scrutinize women’s bodies, women of color at one point not allowed to compete, corporations profiting on the event should have been clue numero uno. The only reason to support them were the scholarships.
Why do you suppose we have the #metoo movement? The attitude that the women are boy toys--just for the taking?
Why bother with swimsuits at all? Why not just parade women naked down the catwalk? If you really want a closer look at bodies?

Seriously, what is wrong with you?
Thanks from RNG and Lyzza
Clara007 is offline  
Old June 6th, 2018, 10:49 AM   #7
I'm debt free
 
TNVolunteer73's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Lebanon, TN
Posts: 36,150
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clara007 View Post
What is up with you, Kate? You have no problem with men calling women "bow-wows" and "Mutts"? Touchy-feely dogs?

Have you MISSED the decades of young women starving themselves? Literally dying to be thin and beautiful? Basing their self-worth on their bodies--their beauty (or lack of it)?

Beauty pageants are antiquated institutions and should have been disposed of long ago. The very fact that they had mostly male judges scrutinize women’s bodies, women of color at one point not allowed to compete, corporations profiting on the event should have been clue numero uno. The only reason to support them were the scholarships.
Why do you suppose we have the #metoo movement? The attitude that the women are boy toys--just for the taking?
Why bother with swimsuits at all? Why not just parade women naked down the catwalk? If you really want a closer look at bodies?

Seriously, what is wrong with you?
you never been to a FLA/GA football game,

The Florida Fans cheer when the GA Cheerleaders run on the field is "Look at them Dawgs"
TNVolunteer73 is offline  
Old June 7th, 2018, 04:04 AM   #8
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: East Coast Of U.S.A.
Posts: 155
Flanders111 is offline  
Old June 7th, 2018, 11:07 AM   #9
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: California
Posts: 18,556
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clara007 View Post
I have know some pretty disgusting MEN in my time, but, BUSTER---

YOU TAKE THE CAKE!
Hold on, are you saying it's ok for Hillary and Maxine Waters to compete?
Thanks from Flanders111
caconservative is offline  
Old June 7th, 2018, 11:09 AM   #10
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: California
Posts: 18,556
Damn, political correctness has reared its ugly head again.
Thanks from Flanders111
caconservative is offline  
Reply

  Defending The Truth Political Forum > Political Forum > Political Talk

Tags
bowwow, miss



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Bye, bye Miss American Pie. roastpork Drugs, Alcohol, Tobacco 5 August 19th, 2014 03:40 AM
Gonna Miss GW? GonnaMissGW Politicians 32 January 23rd, 2009 08:18 AM


Facebook Twitter RSS Feed



Copyright © 2005-2013 Defending The Truth. All rights reserved.