Political Forums  

Go Back   Defending The Truth Political Forum > Political Forum > Politicians

Politicians For topics and discussions about politicians, political leaders, or political figures


Thanks Tree45Thanks
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old May 30th, 2017, 08:21 AM   #41
RNG
Senior Member
 
RNG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Between everywhere
Posts: 26,795
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimgorn View Post
Listen we've been over this before, but you people do obviously inhabit some alternative universe....First off there was not 7 separate investigations all ending with a report....There was 5 investigations started by the intelligence agencies.....They were combined to form the House Select Committee on Benghazi, which exposed Hillary's unsecured server, and released it's report citing sloppy incompetent work done by the State Department....A second report was released by the Senate which also found the State Department's work wanting..

So...stupid??....No...Found nothing???...sorry wrong again.... Get back to the real world...
Wanting, sloppy, and unsecured but never hacked, unlike the government servers?

What a crime wave. As I said, you got nothin'.
RNG is offline  
Old May 31st, 2017, 07:43 AM   #42
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Lehigh Valley Pa.,USA
Posts: 6,816
Quote:
Originally Posted by RNG View Post
Wanting, sloppy, and unsecured but never hacked, unlike the government servers?

What a crime wave. As I said, you got nothin'.
And just like your Trump/Russia conspiracy....questions remain...Like...Were people like Elisha Cummings under orders from Obama to deflect and disrupt the e-mail investigations??..Did Loretta Lynch have orders from Obama to cover up the e-mail investigation??...was James Comey also under similar orders emanating from Obama??

Go ahead keep investigating Trump's non-crime of collusion....maybe we will get to the bottom of the real crime of Obama's obstruction of Justice...
Thanks from Sabcat and Sensible
Jimgorn is offline  
Old May 31st, 2017, 08:02 AM   #43
Have you seen my Iguana
 
Sabcat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Earth
Posts: 22,913
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimgorn View Post
And just like your Trump/Russia conspiracy....questions remain...Like...Were people like Elisha Cummings under orders from Obama to deflect and disrupt the e-mail investigations??..Did Loretta Lynch have orders from Obama to cover up the e-mail investigation??...was James Comey also under similar orders emanating from Obama??

Go ahead keep investigating Trump's non-crime of collusion....maybe we will get to the bottom of the real crime of Obama's obstruction of Justice...
Comey has been on the payroll of...I mean investigating the Clinton crime family since the 90s
Thanks from Jimgorn and Sensible
Sabcat is offline  
Old May 31st, 2017, 09:41 AM   #44
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Michigan
Posts: 2,632
All anyone needs to know, they are following the lib playbook to the tee

Democrats have argued in the past that the seriousness of a charge is all you need to warrant an investigation.

“The nature of the evidence is irrelevant; it’s the seriousness of the charge that matters.” Tom Foley, Democrat, Former Speaker of the House.
Sensible is offline  
Old May 31st, 2017, 10:59 AM   #45
RNG
Senior Member
 
RNG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Between everywhere
Posts: 26,795
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimgorn View Post
And just like your Trump/Russia conspiracy....questions remain...Like...Were people like Elisha Cummings under orders from Obama to deflect and disrupt the e-mail investigations??..Did Loretta Lynch have orders from Obama to cover up the e-mail investigation??...was James Comey also under similar orders emanating from Obama??

Go ahead keep investigating Trump's non-crime of collusion....maybe we will get to the bottom of the real crime of Obama's obstruction of Justice...
Email from CNN this morning:

Quote:
Fired FBI director James Comey plans to testify publicly in the Senate as early as next week to confirm bombshell accusations that President Donald Trump pressured him to end his investigation into a top Trump aide's ties to Russia, a source close to the issue said Wednesday.

Final details are still being worked out and no official date for his testimony has been set. Comey is expected to appear before the Senate Intelligence Committee, which is investigating possible connections between the Trump campaign and Russia during last year's presidential election.
RNG is offline  
Old May 31st, 2017, 12:15 PM   #46
forgot my old user name
 
right to left's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,729
Does Vladimir Putin really own Donald Trump? Would he have owned Hillary Clinton?

Let's imagine every corporate and professional left/liberals fantasy came true in November, and America got it's first female president...thereby solving all womens and gender-related problems in the same way that a two term black presidency fixed everything for Black America!
https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/u...pany.html?_r=0

Beyond mines in Kazakhstan that are among the most lucrative in the world, the sale gave the Russians control of one-fifth of all uranium production capacity in the United States. Since uranium is considered a strategic asset, with implications for national security, the deal had to be approved by a committee composed of representatives from a number of United States government agencies. Among the agencies that eventually signed off was the State Department, then headed by Mr. Clinton’s wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton.

As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show, a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation. Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors. Other people with ties to the company made donations as well.

And shortly after the Russians announced their intention to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One, Mr. Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank with links to the Kremlin that was promoting Uranium One stock.

The New York Times’s examination of the Uranium One deal is based on dozens of interviews, as well as a review of public records and securities filings in Canada, Russia and the United States. Some of the connections between Uranium One and the Clinton Foundation were unearthed by Peter Schweizer, a former fellow at the right-leaning Hoover Institution and author of the forthcoming book “Clinton Cash.” Mr. Schweizer provided a preview of material in the book to The Times, which scrutinized his information and built upon it with its own reporting.

Whether the donations played any role in the approval of the uranium deal is unknown. But the episode underscores the special ethical challenges presented by the Clinton Foundation, headed by a former president who relied heavily on foreign cash to accumulate $250 million in assets even as his wife helped steer American foreign policy as secretary of state, presiding over decisions with the potential to benefit the foundation’s donors.

In a statement, Brian Fallon, a spokesman for Mrs. Clinton’s presidential campaign, said no one “has ever produced a shred of evidence supporting the theory that Hillary Clinton ever took action as secretary of state to support the interests of donors to the Clinton Foundation.” He emphasized that multiple United States agencies, as well as the Canadian government, had signed off on the deal and that, in general, such matters were handled at a level below the secretary. “To suggest the State Department, under then-Secretary Clinton, exerted undue influence in the U.S. government’s review of the sale of Uranium One is utterly baseless,” he added.

American political campaigns are barred from accepting foreign donations. But foreigners may give to foundations in the United States. In the days since Mrs. Clinton announced her candidacy for president, the Clinton Foundation has announced changes meant to quell longstanding concerns about potential conflicts of interest in such donations; it has limited donations from foreign governments, with many, like Russia’s, barred from giving to all but its health care initiatives. That policy stops short of a more stringent agreement between Mrs. Clinton and the Obama administration that was in effect while she was secretary of state.

Either way, the Uranium One deal highlights the limits of such prohibitions. The foundation will continue to accept contributions from foreign sources whose interests, like Uranium One’s, may overlap with those of foreign governments, some of which may be at odds with the United States.

Anyone here recall the public investigation and trial of Bill&Hill for using their foundation to earn money from a sale that increased Russian control of this strategic asset - uranium? Me neither...because it never happened! And the fact that money flows from corporations and foreign corporations and sovereign wealth funds in Arab and Gulf States sitting on huge reserves of oil, should tell any of us that regardless of how corrupt Donald Trump may be, he's not likely any more corrupt than any other major politician or international capitalists who seek to influence foreign governments for financial and strategic interests!

In other words, the laser-like focus on Russia by CIA, NSA, and FBI leaked sources tells me that a large body of unelected, corrupt insiders who have profited from the international drug trade for more than 40 years, have moved their criminal syndicates into military spending and wars of regime change...which kill thousands and destroy the lives of millions forced into exile...not to mention destroy billions of dollars worth of property, are still ventures providing enormous profit potential for the top players....just ask Dick Cheney and Halliburton about the steep rise of their company after gaining billions in Iraq reconstruction contracts.

So, the continual drip, drip, drip of leaks and inuendos about Russia fixing US elections and controlling the President, tells me that the US Deep State is all in agreement on one point: Capitalist Russia and Capitalist China are not part of the club! And needless to say, their allies like Iran also have to be dispatched!

Anyone who would like to live another 10 or 20 years or see their children have a chance to grow into adulthood, should start focusing on the most dangerous issue of the day: The Deep State has effective control of the majority of US media, and gives the orders to elected officials/not the other way around. And the continual push for direct confrontations with two other nations armed with nuclear warheads means that the people running the asylum today have no appreciation of risk! That seems to be obvious after past regime change operations, but they are still pushing forward to their ultimate objective which will likely end with WWIII...because of the stupid assumption that Russia and China will just acquiesce in the face of destruction!
Thanks from Sabcat
right to left is offline  
Old May 31st, 2017, 02:19 PM   #47
Have you seen my Iguana
 
Sabcat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Earth
Posts: 22,913
Quote:
Originally Posted by imaginethat View Post
Bong smoke?

That's scraping the bottom of the barrel.

Let's see what Mueller turns up. Or maybe you could Skype him and tell him we don't really need his services because "the whole thing" is delusional.
Scraping the bottom of the barrel?

Not really. Stereotypes are there for a reason. Inside a haze of pot smoke you can often times find people babbling about wildly random things and munchies.

Seems like the perfect place to entertain those kinds of things.
Thanks from Sensible
Sabcat is offline  
Old June 1st, 2017, 05:48 AM   #48
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Lehigh Valley Pa.,USA
Posts: 6,816
Quote:
Originally Posted by RNG View Post
Email from CNN this morning:
Great....I hope the Senate does a thorough investigation and goes through ALL of Comey's memos , all the way back to the Clinton investigation....Did Loretta Lynch tell him to kill the e-mail investigation??....
Jimgorn is offline  
Reply

  Defending The Truth Political Forum > Political Forum > Politicians

Tags
donald, it’s, putin, trump, vladimir



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How to Think About Vladimir Putin excalibur Current Events 8 April 3rd, 2017 08:40 AM
Donald Trump reminds me of Vladimir Putin — and that is terrifying baloney_detector Politicians 15 July 25th, 2016 02:55 PM
Donald Trump lavishes praise on 'leader' Putin imaginethat Current Events 4 December 18th, 2015 03:29 PM
Vladimir Putin’s holy war imaginethat Politicians 34 December 16th, 2015 07:51 PM
Donald Trump on Vladimir Putin: In terms of leadership, ‘he’s getting an A’ imaginethat Current Events 7 September 30th, 2015 10:45 AM


Facebook Twitter RSS Feed



Copyright © 2005-2013 Defending The Truth. All rights reserved.