Political Forums  

Go Back   Defending The Truth Political Forum > Political Forum > Politicians

Politicians For topics and discussions about politicians, political leaders, or political figures


Thanks Tree62Thanks
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old April 22nd, 2018, 09:39 AM   #31
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: massachusetts
Posts: 11,154
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sabcat View Post
Any logical person would have heard the first story tbat came out of it and known it was trash.

Yet here we are w/ all of the lemmings still parroting the golden.shower.com stories. Very cute.
Name one thing in the Steele Dossier that has proven to be false...

You can't...but you dismiss it all, because you've been told to...
You don't even believe the stuff that has been proven to be true.

You are a very useful idiot...
Thanks from RNG
goober is online now  
Old April 22nd, 2018, 10:18 AM   #32
Senior Member
 
justoneman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: chicago
Posts: 4,236
Quote:
Originally Posted by goober View Post
Look I understand, the Steele Dossier doesn't contain anything that you want to believe, but just because you don't want it to be true, doesn't mean it isn't true.
You can't name one thing in the Steele Dossier that has been shown to be false, there are things that have been confirmed, nothing has been shown to be false.
The "story" came from a foreign ex spy who bought it from Russian operatives. The money came from the DNC and Hillary Clinton. There is the facts we know. These Russians must be laughing their asses off that they can hand over a fake story for money.
justoneman is online now  
Old April 22nd, 2018, 10:25 AM   #33
#freetommy
 
Sabcat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Earth
Posts: 27,130
Quote:
Originally Posted by goober View Post
Name one thing in the Steele Dossier that has proven to be false...

You can't...but you dismiss it all, because you've been told to...
You don't even believe the stuff that has been proven to be true.

You are a very useful idiot...


That is an insane position to take.

Lets use your reasoning


You have sex w/ house cats


Well. It is now on the internet so it must be true.


From here on in you will be known for screwing cats.


Prove it is false
Thanks from justoneman
Sabcat is offline  
Old April 22nd, 2018, 02:12 PM   #34
Senior Member
 
imaginethat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Western Slope, Colorado
Posts: 60,055
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sabcat View Post
I was born this way


Are you implying that you fell for that story?
I understand. My mom was a quiet psychic, and she passed that on to me.

No, I'm saying that you fell for "the story," the story that deludes you into thing that you know guilt or innocence before you can know. In doing so, you insulate yourself from the facts of the matter, which are as of yet not fully known. In fact, we don't even know how much we don't know.

And the energy you devote to remaining insulating is increasing. You increasingly make no sense, and you increasingly seem to be unaware of how you're deconstructing yourself.

That's the problem with your side. You already know what you can't know. It's terrible to watch you, a person of above average intelligence by my estimation, be led around by your nose like this.

Last edited by imaginethat; April 22nd, 2018 at 02:15 PM.
imaginethat is offline  
Old April 22nd, 2018, 02:34 PM   #35
Coconut Lure
 
webguy4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Michigan
Posts: 15,865
Trump bombed Syria, a Russian ally, and likely killed Russian soldiers. Does Trump exhibit signs he is controlled by Putin?

And after being bombed why would Putin still keep mum?

These are evidence the Hillary purchased, Russian collusion dossier is false.
webguy4 is online now  
Old April 22nd, 2018, 02:37 PM   #36
RNG
Senior Member
 
RNG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Between everywhere
Posts: 30,334
Quote:
Originally Posted by webguy4 View Post
Trump bombed Syria, a Russian ally, and likely killed Russian soldiers. Does Trump exhibit signs he is controlled by Putin?

And after being bombed why would Putin still keep mum?

These are evidence the Hillary purchased, Russian collusion dossier is false.
The US, Syria and Russia all say there were no Russian casualties and no civilian casualties.

Amazing isn't it, unless the Republican President maybe intentionally leaked the timing an targets to Putin ahead of time.
RNG is offline  
Old April 22nd, 2018, 03:01 PM   #37
Senior Member
 
imaginethat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Western Slope, Colorado
Posts: 60,055
Quote:
Originally Posted by justoneman View Post
The "story" came from a foreign ex spy who bought it from Russian operatives. The money came from the DNC and Hillary Clinton. There is the facts we know. These Russians must be laughing their asses off that they can hand over a fake story for money.
You're another example of someone claiming to know what you can't know. The Russians laugh at you because you provide cover for them.
imaginethat is offline  
Old April 22nd, 2018, 03:14 PM   #38
Senior Member
 
imaginethat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Western Slope, Colorado
Posts: 60,055
Quote:
Originally Posted by webguy4 View Post
Trump bombed Syria, a Russian ally, and likely killed Russian soldiers. Does Trump exhibit signs he is controlled by Putin?

And after being bombed why would Putin still keep mum?

These are evidence the Hillary purchased, Russian collusion dossier is false.
You, like most of the folks on your side, think the situation in Syria is simple. It's not.

No Russians were bombed. Have you heard of Wagner PMC, PMC an acronym for private military company. You won't read it, but here's an article that will shine a little light on the events you believe you understand but don't.

Syria war: Who are Russia's shadowy Wagner mercenaries?
imaginethat is offline  
Old April 22nd, 2018, 03:15 PM   #39
Senior Member
 
Clara007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Arizona
Posts: 10,651
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sabcat View Post
Cumon lil justin, "reasonable conclusions"?

You call this a reasonable conclusion?





I think maybe all tweeting has further warped your fragile geriatric brain.


Stop being snotty, Sabcat.
Clara007 is online now  
Old April 22nd, 2018, 03:18 PM   #40
Senior Member
 
imaginethat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Western Slope, Colorado
Posts: 60,055
Quote:
Originally Posted by RNG View Post
The US, Syria and Russia all say there were no Russian casualties and no civilian casualties.

Amazing isn't it, unless the Republican President maybe intentionally leaked the timing an targets to Putin ahead of time.
From the article linked above:

Quote:
Why would Russia need mercenaries?

The mercenaries can be deployed in especially tough ground fighting alongside Syrian government troops. And as the Russian government does not officially recognise the mercenaries' existence it can deny or play down any Russian casualties.

Their role has been compared to that of US military contractors in Iraq, who were deployed on a large scale.

The US suffered heavy casualties in Vietnam, and later the Afghanistan war was very costly for Russia. Those wounds - and the associated public anger - encouraged both countries to privatise war in recent years.

Military sources quoted by RBC said that when Russia helped Assad forces to recapture Palmyra it was the Wagner men who went in first. "First Wagner's guys go to work, then the Russian ground units come in, and then the Arabs and the cameras," an unnamed ex-Wagner officer said.

Wagner is believed to be funded by Yevgeny Prigozhin, a rich businessman close to President Vladimir Putin. Mr Prigozhin is on the US sanctions list because of his links to the eastern Ukraine separatists.
In December 2016 the US Treasury said Mr Prigozhin had "extensive business dealings" with the Russian defence ministry and was linked to the construction of a new military base near Ukraine.

What about the Russian debacle on 7 February?

Unnamed US intelligence sources quoted by the Washington Post say Mr Prigozhin was in close contact with the Kremlin in the run-up to the assault on the Syrian Democratic Forces base in Deir al-Zour region. The force is said to have crossed the River Euphrates and shelled the base close to Khursham, a short distance from highly-prized oil fields.

According to the report, intercepted communications showed that Mr Prigozhin was also involved in the operational planning with Syrian officials, ahead of the attack.

Amid unconfirmed reports that more than 100 Russians had been killed, the Kremlin denied that any regular Russian military forces had been involved. It admitted only that there had been "several dozen" Russian casualties, but gave no further details.

On 8 February, a Pentagon spokeswoman said that coalition forces waited to engage the Russians until their artillery was falling within 1,640ft (500 metres) of the US-backed Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) headquarters.

Dana White told reporters that the US and Russia were "in regular communication with Russian counterparts before, during and after the attack" via the so-called de-confliction line of communication between the two nations.
imaginethat is offline  
Reply

  Defending The Truth Political Forum > Political Forum > Politicians

Tags
pee, question



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Got a question dusty Current Events 33 July 26th, 2015 07:21 AM
got a question dusty Conspiracy Theories 9 October 28th, 2010 03:33 PM
A Question of Tax? lesaka90 Healthcare 41 May 4th, 2010 06:43 AM
For all who question...... Dude111 Philosophy 0 March 30th, 2010 01:32 PM


Facebook Twitter RSS Feed



Copyright © 2005-2013 Defending The Truth. All rights reserved.