Political Forums  

Go Back   Defending The Truth Political Forum > Political Forum > Political Ideologies > Socialism

Socialism Socialism Forum - Political Philosophy Forum


Thanks Tree6Thanks
  • 1 Post By Flanders111
  • 1 Post By imaginethat
  • 1 Post By Twisted Sister
  • 1 Post By caconservative
  • 2 Post By tristanrobin
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old June 9th, 2018, 06:05 AM   #1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: East Coast Of U.S.A.
Posts: 131
The Stella Principle

You know that touchy-feely dogs will become the face of American women in the future.
Miss Bow-Wow 2.0
Happily, Jonah Goldberg says what every horny teenage boy thinks.

. . . let me confess my shameful secret: I like looking at really beautiful women, including when they wear bikinis.

It feels so good to finally say that out loud for all to hear.
The lunacy of kicking ‘beauty’ out of the Miss America pageant
By Jonah Goldberg
June 8, 2018 | 7:20pm

https://nypost.com/2018/06/08/the-lu...erica-pageant/
Now that Miss America is no longer allowed to wear a bathing suit it is fair to say the B.S. rule is an attack on capitalism. Not to worry. Even the Mad Russian is contaminated by a touch of free enterprise:

Comey: Trump says Putin bragged about Russia having the 'most beautiful hookers in the world'
By Avery Anapol - 04/19/18 09:48 PM EDT

Comey: Trump says Putin bragged about Russia having the 'most beautiful hookers in the world' | TheHill
The old Commie’s keen eye can see Stella, but he knows nothing about capitalism’s economics.

Women have performed sex for money in every country and culture since the beginning of time. The money today’s top call girls earn every year is peanuts compared to what an ambitious woman can earn by getting ahead in a major industry. I cannot tell you how much those leggy broads on Outnumbered are paid, but I can tell you it ain’t because of their brains.



Beauty commands a higher price in every field where sex is sold ——— from high-priced call girls to streetwalkers. How bad can any economy be when competent working girls make a thousand dollars an hour?


After listening to Stella By Starlight, that beautiful melody written for a 1944 ghost movie The Uninvited, I was reminded of an old message of mine from May of 2002 that I update and post from time to time.

When the girls compete in a knocking shop like a bar or a cathouse you will find Stella by Starlight on the payroll. Stella is only trotted out if a prospective buyer refuses to pay for the charms offered by lesser lights. Even in those tart shops where all of the working girls possess physical beauty there is a Stella in attendance who shines just a little brighter than her sisters. Stella is like the shiniest used car on the lot; she may not perform all that well, but she still commands the highest price.

I must say that I neither condone nor condemn the Stella Principle. It is a fact of life. I suspect that if we went back to the first cave of ill repute we would find a Stella who commanded more colored pebbles than her sisters got for placing their heels behind their ears. In truth, prostitution was the foundation of money eons ago regardless of every economic system that came and went.

Sales techniques in almost every field are predicated on the Stella by Starlight Principle. Of course there are some areas where Stella is not required. For example: One does not buy a pill because it is more beautiful than all of the other pills; nevertheless, beauty (packaging) is a sales aid in most realms of commerce. Beautiful women sell cosmetics to plain Janes, not the other way around. Magazine publishers feature young men and women of beautiful face and form in order to sell their magazines. Such mags would not attempt to sell their publications by featuring unbecoming subjects in various stages of undress.

In effect, Socialism denies the existence of physical beauty. At the very least, Socialism denies the value of beauty when it comes to selling. That explains the drab, unattractive, world that Socialists/Communists have in store for everyone except themselves.

Socialism is driven by envy; so it is reasonable to say that tax-dollar wealthy Socialists get sick with envy at the thought of a beautiful hustling girl screwing a working class nobody for free while they have to pay for it. Most of the abuse women experience at the hands of people like Harvey Weinstein looking for free sex. Basically, they have tons of money, but they resent paying for it out of their own pockets when they can force themselves on respectable women.

Bottom line: Socialist moralists are not against prostitution as they always claim. They are in favor of a woman’s Right to choose abortion, while they are against beautiful women having the Right to choose their partners in sex.

Socialism’s sick insistence that inner-beauty is the only beauty that means anything is evident in almost every touchy-feely issue that Socialists promote. By denying physical beauty its due it then becomes easier for Socialists to denounce excellence in everything else.

Socialists denying the importance of external beauty face the consequences of eventual defeat followed by certain ridicule. Or perhaps Communist moralists think they can do away with prostitution while using the Stella Principle to further Communism? If that is what they are up to lately they obviously do not understand that the Stella Principle will always contradict Communism whether or not prostitution is involved in financial transactions.

The Communist hogwash that says “Prostitution is the cornerstone of capitalism” makes me think that Socialists have to do away with all selling if their religion is to survive. How can a Socialist/Communist system of government allow sales of any kind to exist if one of Communism’s basic tenets is true? (If the old Commies were right, sex for money would only exist in laissez faire capitalist countries.)


laissez faire also laisser faire (noun)

1. An economic doctrine that opposes governmental regulation of or interference in commerce beyond the minimum necessary for a free-enterprise system to operate according to its own economic laws.

2. Noninterference in the affairs of others.
Oddly enough, prostitution is the last stronghold of collective bargaining left untouched by Big Brother’s intrusion into every aspect of private sector life. The irony is that Communism is unwittingly guaranteeing prostitution’s growth because it leaves freedom of choice to the individual in that one realm while denying it everywhere else.

If prostitution has anything at all to do with capitalism, which I doubt, it is the premium that prostitution places on beauty. Beauty commands a higher price in every venue that allows women to sell their sexual wares; that is in hotels, bars, cathouses, cribs, and call girl services. Even the incomes of freelance streetwalkers is determined by beauty.

Finally, some years ago, the United Nations outlawed prostitution. The ban was instrumental in closing down a great many houses of ill repute worldwide; driving painted ladies into bars where they supplemented their legitimate incomes with watered-down drinks.

I cracked up when I read that American taxpayer are training Chinese hustling girls to “drink responsibly.” Does that mean more water in the drinks? Or does it mean more alcohol?


The grant, made last November, refers to prostitutes as "female sex workers"--or FSW--and their handlers as "gatekeepers."
CNSNews.com
U.S. Will Pay $2.6 Million to Train Chinese Prostitutes to Drink Responsibly on the Job
Tuesday, May 12, 2009
By Edwin Mora

https://www.cnsnews.com/news/article...esponsibly-job
p.s. In 1998 then-First Lady Hillary Clinton called for an Internet gate-keeping function:

As exciting as these new developments are.... there are a number of serious issues without any kind of editing function or gate-keeping function. What does it mean to have the right to defend your reputation, or to respond to what someone says?

No Gatekeepers
Thanks a lot Hillary. Calling pimps gatekeepers protects their reputations.
Thanks from Twisted Sister

Last edited by Flanders111; June 9th, 2018 at 06:37 AM.
Flanders111 is offline  
Old June 9th, 2018, 08:32 AM   #2
Senior Member
 
imaginethat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Western Slope, Colorado
Posts: 60,008
What is your point in posting this?
Thanks from Clara007
imaginethat is offline  
Old June 9th, 2018, 08:54 AM   #3
Senior Member
 
Twisted Sister's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Brown Township, Ohio
Posts: 11,889
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flanders111 View Post
You know that touchy-feely dogs will become the face of American women in the future.
Miss Bow-Wow 2.0
Happily, Jonah Goldberg says what every horny teenage boy thinks.

. . . let me confess my shameful secret: I like looking at really beautiful women, including when they wear bikinis.

It feels so good to finally say that out loud for all to hear.
The lunacy of kicking ‘beauty’ out of the Miss America pageant
By Jonah Goldberg
June 8, 2018 | 7:20pm

https://nypost.com/2018/06/08/the-lu...erica-pageant/
Now that Miss America is no longer allowed to wear a bathing suit it is fair to say the B.S. rule is an attack on capitalism. Not to worry. Even the Mad Russian is contaminated by a touch of free enterprise:

Comey: Trump says Putin bragged about Russia having the 'most beautiful hookers in the world'
By Avery Anapol - 04/19/18 09:48 PM EDT

Comey: Trump says Putin bragged about Russia having the 'most beautiful hookers in the world' | TheHill
The old Commie’s keen eye can see Stella, but he knows nothing about capitalism’s economics.

Women have performed sex for money in every country and culture since the beginning of time. The money today’s top call girls earn every year is peanuts compared to what an ambitious woman can earn by getting ahead in a major industry. I cannot tell you how much those leggy broads on Outnumbered are paid, but I can tell you it ain’t because of their brains.



Beauty commands a higher price in every field where sex is sold ——— from high-priced call girls to streetwalkers. How bad can any economy be when competent working girls make a thousand dollars an hour?


After listening to Stella By Starlight, that beautiful melody written for a 1944 ghost movie The Uninvited, I was reminded of an old message of mine from May of 2002 that I update and post from time to time.

When the girls compete in a knocking shop like a bar or a cathouse you will find Stella by Starlight on the payroll. Stella is only trotted out if a prospective buyer refuses to pay for the charms offered by lesser lights. Even in those tart shops where all of the working girls possess physical beauty there is a Stella in attendance who shines just a little brighter than her sisters. Stella is like the shiniest used car on the lot; she may not perform all that well, but she still commands the highest price.

I must say that I neither condone nor condemn the Stella Principle. It is a fact of life. I suspect that if we went back to the first cave of ill repute we would find a Stella who commanded more colored pebbles than her sisters got for placing their heels behind their ears. In truth, prostitution was the foundation of money eons ago regardless of every economic system that came and went.

Sales techniques in almost every field are predicated on the Stella by Starlight Principle. Of course there are some areas where Stella is not required. For example: One does not buy a pill because it is more beautiful than all of the other pills; nevertheless, beauty (packaging) is a sales aid in most realms of commerce. Beautiful women sell cosmetics to plain Janes, not the other way around. Magazine publishers feature young men and women of beautiful face and form in order to sell their magazines. Such mags would not attempt to sell their publications by featuring unbecoming subjects in various stages of undress.

In effect, Socialism denies the existence of physical beauty. At the very least, Socialism denies the value of beauty when it comes to selling. That explains the drab, unattractive, world that Socialists/Communists have in store for everyone except themselves.

Socialism is driven by envy; so it is reasonable to say that tax-dollar wealthy Socialists get sick with envy at the thought of a beautiful hustling girl screwing a working class nobody for free while they have to pay for it. Most of the abuse women experience at the hands of people like Harvey Weinstein looking for free sex. Basically, they have tons of money, but they resent paying for it out of their own pockets when they can force themselves on respectable women.

Bottom line: Socialist moralists are not against prostitution as they always claim. They are in favor of a woman’s Right to choose abortion, while they are against beautiful women having the Right to choose their partners in sex.

Socialism’s sick insistence that inner-beauty is the only beauty that means anything is evident in almost every touchy-feely issue that Socialists promote. By denying physical beauty its due it then becomes easier for Socialists to denounce excellence in everything else.

Socialists denying the importance of external beauty face the consequences of eventual defeat followed by certain ridicule. Or perhaps Communist moralists think they can do away with prostitution while using the Stella Principle to further Communism? If that is what they are up to lately they obviously do not understand that the Stella Principle will always contradict Communism whether or not prostitution is involved in financial transactions.

The Communist hogwash that says “Prostitution is the cornerstone of capitalism” makes me think that Socialists have to do away with all selling if their religion is to survive. How can a Socialist/Communist system of government allow sales of any kind to exist if one of Communism’s basic tenets is true? (If the old Commies were right, sex for money would only exist in laissez faire capitalist countries.)


laissez faire also laisser faire (noun)

1. An economic doctrine that opposes governmental regulation of or interference in commerce beyond the minimum necessary for a free-enterprise system to operate according to its own economic laws.

2. Noninterference in the affairs of others.
Oddly enough, prostitution is the last stronghold of collective bargaining left untouched by Big Brother’s intrusion into every aspect of private sector life. The irony is that Communism is unwittingly guaranteeing prostitution’s growth because it leaves freedom of choice to the individual in that one realm while denying it everywhere else.

If prostitution has anything at all to do with capitalism, which I doubt, it is the premium that prostitution places on beauty. Beauty commands a higher price in every venue that allows women to sell their sexual wares; that is in hotels, bars, cathouses, cribs, and call girl services. Even the incomes of freelance streetwalkers is determined by beauty.

Finally, some years ago, the United Nations outlawed prostitution. The ban was instrumental in closing down a great many houses of ill repute worldwide; driving painted ladies into bars where they supplemented their legitimate incomes with watered-down drinks.

I cracked up when I read that American taxpayer are training Chinese hustling girls to “drink responsibly.” Does that mean more water in the drinks? Or does it mean more alcohol?


The grant, made last November, refers to prostitutes as "female sex workers"--or FSW--and their handlers as "gatekeepers."
CNSNews.com
U.S. Will Pay $2.6 Million to Train Chinese Prostitutes to Drink Responsibly on the Job
Tuesday, May 12, 2009
By Edwin Mora

https://www.cnsnews.com/news/article...esponsibly-job
p.s. In 1998 then-First Lady Hillary Clinton called for an Internet gate-keeping function:

As exciting as these new developments are.... there are a number of serious issues without any kind of editing function or gate-keeping function. What does it mean to have the right to defend your reputation, or to respond to what someone says?

No Gatekeepers
Thanks a lot Hillary. Calling pimps gatekeepers protects their reputations.
The four dollar gold Stella is the most beautiful coin ever minted. I could not afford the Stella but have three dollar gold Indian Princess's. Years ago the most inexpensive Stella started at 100k. I might buy a Stella out of pure spite.
Thanks from Flanders111

Last edited by Twisted Sister; June 9th, 2018 at 09:17 AM.
Twisted Sister is offline  
Old June 9th, 2018, 09:07 AM   #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: California
Posts: 18,530
Quote:
Originally Posted by imaginethat View Post
What is your point in posting this?
Bikinis!
Thanks from Flanders111
caconservative is offline  
Old June 9th, 2018, 09:17 AM   #5
Senior Member
 
tristanrobin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: New Haven, CT
Posts: 23,893
Thanks from Twisted Sister and Flanders111
tristanrobin is offline  
Old June 9th, 2018, 10:43 AM   #6
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: East Coast Of U.S.A.
Posts: 131
Quote:
Originally Posted by imaginethat View Post
What is your point in posting this?
To imaginethat: To highlight Socialism’s/Communism’s governing philosophy in everything. I thought I made that clear!

Incidentally, I thought it strange that there was only one other thread in the Socialism forum before this one. This is the first time I ever had a SOCIALISM forum all to myself.

Last edited by Flanders111; June 9th, 2018 at 11:18 AM.
Flanders111 is offline  
Reply

  Defending The Truth Political Forum > Political Forum > Political Ideologies > Socialism

Tags
principle, stella



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Trump Wants To Upend 230 Years of Constitutional Principle tristanrobin Current Events 24 November 17th, 2017 12:12 PM
Taqiyya ― Islamic Principle of Lying for the Sake of Allah Grizz1 Current Events 103 August 5th, 2015 05:38 AM
This Is About Political Cash, Not Political Principle skews13 Current Events 0 September 18th, 2013 07:57 AM
First Principle: The Defeat of the Christmas Carol. falcondule Christianity 9 September 5th, 2013 05:58 PM
Greenspan: GOP gave up 'principle for power' CNN Current Events 3 January 3rd, 2009 05:09 AM


Facebook Twitter RSS Feed



Copyright © 2005-2013 Defending The Truth. All rights reserved.