Political Forums  

Go Back   Defending The Truth Political Forum > Political Issues > Warfare

Warfare Warfare Military Forum - For topics and discussions related to combat and peace efforts


Thanks Tree16Thanks
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old October 11th, 2016, 12:56 PM   #21
Banned
 
Daws77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: California
Posts: 7,543
Quote:
Originally Posted by coke View Post
Actually Assad and Putin do not care about civilian casualties. They take the attitude of if you are going to conduct warfare from behind civilians then we will kill the civilians to get to you. My point is this. Is it moral for the rebel leaders to continue to conduct warfare from behind civilian shields knowing this?
since morality is subjective, it not your judgement to make for them only for yourself.
Daws77 is offline  
Old October 11th, 2016, 01:01 PM   #22
Banned
 
coke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: nunya
Posts: 12,580
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daws77 View Post
since morality is subjective, it not your judgement to make for them only for yourself.
If you would like to answer you certainly could use your own moral judgments to clarify your opinion with your answer. So in affect it would be your moral constructing the opinion you answered with. Not my morals. I asked the question. It would not be my morals on trial, it would be the person who answers the question.
coke is offline  
Old October 11th, 2016, 01:02 PM   #23
Talent on loan from god
 
Camelot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Ohio
Posts: 25,530
Quote:
Originally Posted by coke View Post
Actually Assad and Putin do not care about civilian casualties. They take the attitude of if you are going to conduct warfare from behind civilians then we will kill the civilians to get to you. My point is this. Is it moral for the rebel leaders to continue to conduct warfare from behind civilian shields knowing this?
They have nowhere else to go. Do you want them to go out into the desert so Putin and Assad can wipe them out ? Get real.
Thanks from Daws77

Last edited by Camelot; October 11th, 2016 at 01:08 PM.
Camelot is offline  
Old October 11th, 2016, 01:04 PM   #24
Banned
 
Daws77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: California
Posts: 7,543
Quote:
Originally Posted by coke View Post
If you would like to answer you certainly could use your own moral judgments to clarify your opinion with your answer. So in affect it would be your moral constructing the opinion you answered with. Not my morals. I asked the question. It would not be my morals on trial, it would be the person who answers the question.
false! it the person asking the question .
I have already answered.
Daws77 is offline  
Old October 11th, 2016, 01:05 PM   #25
Banned
 
coke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: nunya
Posts: 12,580
Quote:
Originally Posted by Camelot View Post
They have nowhere else to go. Do you want them to go out into the desert do Putin and Assad can wipe them out ? Get real.
Ok. Now that is an answer. So your saying that it is justified for the rebels to continue to conduct warfare using civilians as shields. As opposed to surrendering or doing just as you cited. Am I correct on that being your meaning?
coke is offline  
Old October 11th, 2016, 01:05 PM   #26
Banned
 
Daws77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: California
Posts: 7,543
Quote:
Originally Posted by Camelot View Post
They have nowhere else to go. Do you want them to go out into the desert do Putin and Assad can wipe them out ? Get real.
they can do mass suicide and rob Assad and Putin of a victory.
Daws77 is offline  
Old October 11th, 2016, 01:11 PM   #27
Banned
 
coke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: nunya
Posts: 12,580
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daws77 View Post
yes all your questions came from assumptions .
You said my questions was assumptions. How can they be assumptions if they came from assumptions? You did not like the questions and you found them to be assumptions because you felt that there was no way to answer them in a manner you found acceptable. In short you had straight forward questions that you could not answer in a way that fit your political narrative. Basically you did not like the truth in this case so you built a bridge to nowhere to avoid it. The easiest thing for you to have done was just not participate
coke is offline  
Old October 11th, 2016, 01:11 PM   #28
Banned
 
coke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: nunya
Posts: 12,580
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daws77 View Post
they can do mass suicide and rob Assad and Putin of a victory.
See, now that would be another option as well
coke is offline  
Old October 11th, 2016, 01:11 PM   #29
Talent on loan from god
 
Camelot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Ohio
Posts: 25,530
Quote:
Originally Posted by coke View Post
Ok. Now that is an answer. So your saying that it is justified for the rebels to continue to conduct warfare using civilians as shields. As opposed to surrendering or doing just as you cited. Am I correct on that being your meaning?
Civilians cannot shield the rebels from chlorine gas barrel bombs. Hell, Assad and Putin even bombed a humanitarian relief convoy heading to Aleppo. Did they do that because the road was shielding the convoy ? Sue for peace, this is embarrassing.
Camelot is offline  
Old October 11th, 2016, 01:14 PM   #30
Banned
 
coke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: nunya
Posts: 12,580
Quote:
Originally Posted by Camelot View Post
Civilians cannot shield the rebels from chlorine gas barrel bombs. Hell, Assad and Putin even bombed a humanitarian relief convoy heading to Aleppo. Did they do that because the road was shielding the convoy ? Sue for peace, this is embarrassing.
I would assume they knew the people with guns (rebels) would take the humanitarian goods for themselves thus enabling their enemy. This is pretty straight forward tactics. As I previously stated. There is no doubt hat Assad and Putin do not are how many civilians get killed. So, they will continue to kill civilians to get at the rebels. So, do you still feel the rebels are justified?
coke is offline  
Reply

  Defending The Truth Political Forum > Political Issues > Warfare

Tags
aleppo



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Gary Johnson - "What is Aleppo ?" Camelot Current Events 35 September 10th, 2016 04:05 AM
Aleppo Twisted Sister Current Events 1 May 29th, 2016 07:42 AM


Facebook Twitter RSS Feed



Copyright © 2005-2013 Defending The Truth. All rights reserved.