Political Forums  

Go Back   Defending The Truth Political Forum > Discussion > World History

World History World History Forum - For topics and discussions about our world and global history


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old June 8th, 2018, 02:29 AM   #1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: East Coast Of U.S.A.
Posts: 140
Who Signs It?

Woodrow Wilson actually started the Korean War in this speech 101 years ago:

First World War.com - Primary Documents - Peace Without Victory, 22 January 1917

The shooting began in 1950. That means Trump thinks he can end a shooting war that began 68 years ago. Lots of luck on getting a peace treaty.

One of the ways Trump might improve those ties is by signing a declaration to end the Korean War when he meets with Kim next week. That war ended in 1953 with an armistice — not a formal peace treaty — which means the war is technically still going on. Formally ending the conflict would be a powerful symbol that hostilities on the Korean Peninsula may, possibly, be coming to a close.

At a minimum, Trump could sign a peace treaty with North Korea, which Pyongyang also wants.
Trump just made 3 shocking statements about North Korea
Yes, even worse than normal.
By Alex Ward@AlexWardVoxalex.ward@vox.com Jun 7, 2018, 5:30pm EDT

https://www.vox.com/2018/6/7/1743907...-normalization
NOTE: The Korean War is a United Nations Police Action which is a synonym for undeclared war. U.N. peacekeeping was spawned by the Korean War.

I do not see how President Trump can sign a peace treaty since Congress never declared war on North Korea.

Trump has his nose so far up the U.N.’s ass he will sign for the United Nations which is exactly what Peace Without Victory means.

U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Nikki Haley could sign the peace treaty.

South Korea and North Korea could sign a peace treaty without either side claiming victory. Kim Jong-un (China) sure as hell will not sign anything that hands a victory to South Korea.

If truth be told U.N. Secretary General António Guterres should sign the peace treaty.

I cannot see an American general signing such a document. In any event I am not sure which country is surrendering.



General of the Army Douglas MacArthur signing the Instrument of Surrender on behalf of the Allied Powers

Withdrawing from the United Nations is the only peace treaty that means anything.
Flanders111 is offline  
Old June 10th, 2018, 12:26 AM   #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: East Coast Of U.S.A.
Posts: 140
'I'm going on a mission of peace': Optimistic Trump jets out of the G7 summit early for historic summit with Kim Jong-un, and says the Korean leader has 'one shot' to show he's serious

Trump leaves G7 for Singapore and says he's on a 'mission of peace' | Daily Mail Online
Trump should say “I’m going on a mission of Peace Without Victory in our time.”

The asshole handing North Korea (China) Peace Without Victory means that 33,686 Americans died in vain fighting Communism. In truth, Peace Without Victory means a major victory for U.N.-loving traitors.
Flanders111 is offline  
Old June 11th, 2018, 05:53 AM   #3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: East Coast Of U.S.A.
Posts: 140
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flanders111 View Post
Trump should say “I’m going on a mission of Peace Without Victory in our time.”
Relate “irreversible denuclearization” to Trump’s Wall. Changing a few immigration laws is the only thing that will secure our borders not a wall. I can already hear coyotes telling illegal aliens:

Once more unto the breach, dear friends, once more;
Or close the wall up with your dead.

I do not know where Senator Gardner’s loyalties lie, nor do I know how bright he is, but he should be told that denuclearization is misdirection:


"An agreement to denuclearize is important," said Sen. Cory Gardner, R-Colo., when asked what would constitute progress. "The details of that, how that looks, will obviously take time but we have to make sure Kim Jong Un is committed to the complete verifiable, irreversible denuclearization of North Korea. We need to make sure that there's no other ulterior motive for this summit and that we have that ... commitment in place."
Senators: Just sitting down with Kim Jong Un is progress
by Al Weaver
| June 11, 2018 12:00 AM

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/n...un-is-progress
Threatening North Korea with the U.S. military is the U.N.’s ulterior motive:

Donald Trump threatens Kim Jong-un with military action after cancelling meeting
By Rozina Sabur, Washington Ben Riley-Smith, US Editor Nicola Smith, Taipei
24 May 2018 • 2:50pm

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/201...h-koreas-open/
Withdrawing from the United Nations is the only thing that will prevent North Korea (China) from getting Peace Without Victory —— not “denuclearization.”

QUESTION: Why is denuclearizing North Korea so important and not China? ANSWER: It is not from China’s negotiating position. China does not want North Korea to denuclearize any more than China wants U.S. troops gone:


Regardless of Kim Jong-un’s druthers he got the memo from Xi Jinping. China never wanted U.S. troops out of South Korea because their presence guarantied Peace Without Victory which, in turn, gave China the time to grow in military strength.

To Go, Or To Stay, Is The Question?
If Trump wants to defend this country from the biggest threat in the Far East he better realize that Xi Jinping thinks he is Leroy Brown and a whole lot meaner than a junkyard dog.


Jokes aside. The longer North Korea has nukes the longer China has to prepare their attack on the U.S.

p.s. If the Soviets had cannon fodder like North Korea the American people would be speaking Russian today.
Flanders111 is offline  
Old June 12th, 2018, 03:56 AM   #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: East Coast Of U.S.A.
Posts: 140
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flanders111 View Post
If Trump wants to defend this country from the biggest threat in the Far East he better realize that Xi Jinping thinks he is Leroy Brown and a whole lot meaner than a junkyard dog.
I do not see Leroy’s name on this:

Joint Statement of President Donald J. Trump of the United States of America and Chairman Kim Jong Un of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea at the Singapore Summit

President Donald J. Trump of the United States of America and Chairman Kim Jong Un of the State Affairs Commission of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) held a first, historic summit in Singapore on June 12, 2018.

President Trump and Chairman Kim Jong Un conducted a comprehensive, in-depth, and sincere exchange of opinions on the issues related to the establishment of new U.S.-DPRK relations and the building of a lasting and robust peace regime on the Korean Peninsula. President Trump committed to provide security guarantees to the DPRK, and Chairman Kim Jong Un reaffirmed his firm and unwavering commitment to complete denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula.

Convinced that the establishment of new U.S.-DPRK relations will contribute to the peace and prosperity of the Korean Peninsula and of the world, and recognizing that mutual confidence building can promote the denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula, President Trump and Chairman Kim Jong Un state the following:

1. The United States and the DPRK commit to establish new U.S.-DPRK relations in accordance with the desire of the peoples of the two countries for peace and prosperity.

2. The United States and the DPRK will join their efforts to build a lasting and stable peace regime on the Korean Peninsula.

3. Reaffirming the April 27, 2018 Panmunjom Declaration, the DPRK commits to work toward complete denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula.

4. The United States and the DPRK commit to recovering POW/MIA remains, including the immediate repatriation of those already identified.

Having acknowledged that the U.S.-DPRK summit—the first in history—was an epochal event of great significance in overcoming decades of tensions and hostilities between the two countries and for the opening up of a new future, President Trump and Chairman Kim Jong Un commit to implement the stipulations in this joint statement fully and expeditiously. The United States and the DPRK commit to hold follow-on negotiations, led by the U.S. Secretary of State, Mike Pompeo, and a relevant high-level DPRK official, at the earliest possible date, to implement the outcomes of the U.S.-DPRK summit.

President Donald J. Trump of the United States of America and Chairman Kim Jong Un of the State Affairs Commission of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea have committed to cooperate for the development of new U.S.-DPRK relations and for the promotion of peace, prosperity, and security of the Korean Peninsula and of the world.

[signature]

DONALD J. TRUMP
President of the United States of America

[signature]

KIM JONG UN
Chairman of the State Affairs Commission of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea

June 12, 2018
Sentosa Island
Singapore
If and when they ever get around to the details in a treaty our super negotiator better make sure that North Korea will not get nuclear missiles from China, Iran, et al. In fact, China will now increase its own nuclear capabilities in order to supply North Korea.

NOTE: The Sitdown in Singapore solidified Woodrow Wilson’s first Peace With Victory failure.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Flanders111 View Post
Trump should say “I’m going on a mission of Peace Without Victory in our time.”
Media mouths are peeing themselves with excitement over the possibility of ending a United Nations war where 33,686 Americans now died in vain; so I have one question after Trump gets off Air Force One waving a piece paper. Where is our Winston Churchill?


Last edited by Flanders111; June 12th, 2018 at 09:27 AM.
Flanders111 is offline  
Old June 12th, 2018, 11:04 AM   #5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: East Coast Of U.S.A.
Posts: 140
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flanders111 View Post
U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Nikki Haley could sign the peace treaty.
I almost barfed when I heard Jessica Tarlov say Haley could be the first female president. Move the cursor to 25:40 if you have a strong stomach:


In case you missed it Tralov was saying that a stint at the United Nations qualifies Haley for the presidency. She could easily have qualified Madeleine Albright, Condoleezza Rice, Suzy Five Shows, Samantha Power, or Hillary Clinton U.N.-lovers all. With media mouths like Tarlov pontificating it is no wonder FOX News has become a joke to conservatives.

Nikki Haley is Trump’s worst appointment. Realistically speaking, Trump will never do anything that angers the United Nations crowd —— aside from giving Ambassador Nikki Haley the authority to talk tough for public consumption.

In the interest of full disclosure I did not much care for Nikki Haley before Trump made her U.S. Ambassador to the U.N.

Just to clarify my objection. Then-Governor Haley came out of the United Nations closet way back in 2015. She made a lot of noise about a few dozen Gitmo prisoners, then supported a policy that forced Americans to accept, and support, hundreds of thousands of United Nations refugees:

This sounded good on the face of it:


Nikki Haley, South Carolina’s Republican governor, came out last Thursday and blasted possible White House plans to bring Guantanamo Bay prisoners to her state.
XXXXX


“We are absolutely drawing a line that we are not going to allow any terrorist to come into South Carolina,” Haley said. “We are not going to allow that kind of threat, we are not going to allow that kind of character to come in.

Look a little deeper and you will see that Governor Haley is another Republican who is either stupid, or afraid to offend the New World Order crowd, or she agrees with giving the United Nations authority over her state:

Yet, at the same time she was drawing a red line against Gitmo terrorists who would stay locked in a brig off the coast of Charleston, Haley was opening her arms wide to welcome “refugees” from jihadist strongholds in the Middle East and Africa.

In addition to accepting economic refugees, Haley has no problem with American parasites being paid tax dollars to implement a United Nations program:

World Relief, an evangelical aid agency that gets paid by the federal government to resettle refugees in the U.S. from places like Somalia and Syria, hatched plans more than a year ago to add Spartanburg, South Carolina, to the list of more than 190 U.S. cities receiving foreign refugees.

And what the hell is the difference between enemy combatants in Gitmo who got caught, and those enemy soldiers the United Nations impose on Americans?:

As WND has reported in a series of more than 35 articles over the past year, the refugee program has been fraught with problems. Chief among them has been young men entering the U.S. as refugees and turning out to be terrorists.
XXXXX

According to information supplied recently by Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala., at least 72 cases have been documented in just the past year of Muslim immigrants becoming involved in terrorist activity.
Anybody interested in learning more about how the United Nations gets into our domestic affairs you can start with South Carolina. Naturally, former SENATOR, and longtime traitor, John Kerry pops up in the article:

Kerry sent one of his top lieutenants to Spartanburg earlier this week to try to quell the uprising.
Nikki Haley welcomes Muslim refugees
Posted By Leo Hohmann On 08/28/2015 @ 8:23 pm

Nikki Haley welcomes Muslim refugees
Trump and Haley made me antsy on her first day on the job:

Bureaucrats and diplomats at the United Nations are scrambling to adjust to the new Trump administration. One thing seems certain. The Obama days of wine and roses for the UN are over. The new U.S. ambassador to the UN, Nikki Haley, told reporters on Friday, upon entering UN headquarters for the first time in her new role, “you are going to see a change in the way we do business.” She added that the Trump administration “is prepared and ready to go in – to have me go in, look at the UN, and everything that’s working, we’re going to make it better; everything that’s not working, we’re going to try and fix; and anything that seems to be obsolete and not necessary, we’re going to do away with.” For anyone whom might doubt that the Trump administration means business, Ambassador Haley made it clear that the administration would be “taking names” of “those who don’t have our back.”
Ending Business as Usual at the United Nations
By Joseph A. Klein
January 28, 2017

http://canadafreepress.com/article/e...united-nations
Let me cut to the chase. Media mouths go out of their way to portray Haley standing up to United Nations filth. In fact, she said making the U.N. work better when passing H.R. 193 is the only cure for that disease.

Last edited by Flanders111; June 12th, 2018 at 12:47 PM.
Flanders111 is offline  
Old June 13th, 2018, 09:11 AM   #6
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: East Coast Of U.S.A.
Posts: 140
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flanders111 View Post
I have one question after Trump gets off Air Force One waving a piece paper. Where is our Winston Churchill?


Jeez, this sounds a lot like “Peace in our time.”


. . . everyone can “sleep well tonight” now that nuclear warfare seems to have been averted.
'Sleep Well Tonight!': Trump Says N. Korea 'No Longer a Nuclear Threat' After Returning From Summit
AARON CREDEUR
JUN 13, 2018 | 9:17 AM

https://ijr.com/2018/06/1102743-trump-tweets-nk-summit/
Flanders111 is offline  
Old June 20th, 2018, 04:20 AM   #7
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: East Coast Of U.S.A.
Posts: 140
Here comes another load of steaming United Nations B.S.

The United States announced Tuesday that it is leaving the United Nations Human Rights Council over its “chronic bias” against Israel.

It is the second U.N. organization that has been found to be faulty, and not to be worth continued involvement, after the U.S. announced just months ago it was leaving the United Nations’ Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization over the same issue.

At that time, UNESCO had got too far by going “delusional” and declaring the Cave of the Patriarchs in Hebron a “Palestinian heritage site.”
Notice that HRC is also an acronym for Hillary Rodham Clinton
Tuesday’s decision regarding the HRC was announced by U.S. Ambassador Nikki Haley.

Reuters reported, “Standing with U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, Haley slammed Russia, China, Cuba and Egypt for thwarting U.S. efforts to reform the council. She also criticized countries which shared U.S. values and encouraged Washington to remain but ‘were unwilling to seriously challenge the status quo.'”


The report revealed the U.S. was half through a three-year term, but the departure provided little surprise, since the Trump administration repeatedly has condemned members for their open bias.

Haley cited Venezuela, China, Cuba and Democratic Republic of Congo, all members of the Human Rights group, for their “appalling disrespect for the most basic rights.”
'Chronic bias': U.S. abandons U.N. Human Rights Council
Posted By Bob Unruh On 06/19/2018 @ 8:24 pm

?Chronic bias?: U.S. abandons U.N. Human Rights Council
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flanders111 View Post
Let me cut to the chase. Media mouths go out of their way to portray Haley standing up to United Nations filth. In fact, she said making the U.N. work better when passing H.R. 193 is the only cure for that disease.
I gave up on the U.S. withdrawing from the United Nations while Trump is president, but if he and Haley are so worried about human Rights abuses they would tell the U.N. to insert their economic refugees where the sun never shines. In short: Trump and Haley do not give a damn about human Rights when a U.N. policy abuses Americans.
Flanders111 is offline  
Reply

  Defending The Truth Political Forum > Discussion > World History

Tags
signs


« Dear reader | - »

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Warning signs coke Current Events 0 November 2nd, 2015 07:35 PM
Signs Polari Political Talk 40 November 25th, 2014 08:15 AM
Nev. Gov Signs Pro-Trans Law Ray Kaye Gay and Lesbian Rights 18 June 10th, 2011 02:01 PM
Hilarious Gay Protest Signs PaperAlchemist Gay and Lesbian Rights 11 October 13th, 2010 06:59 PM


Facebook Twitter RSS Feed



Copyright © 2005-2013 Defending The Truth. All rights reserved.