A tale of two terrorists

Mar 2018
834
272
Rosebud
If you believe the BS storys about anything that oozes past the hemorrhoids of the Iranians here's one you should be cheering about too. Don't bother to bore us with the "what ifs" and "what abouts" it only embarrasses you further.

"Here’s all you should about the bases and the scale of the attack on Wednesday:
15 missile fired, 80 killed in missile attacks claims Iran
Iranian state television said at least 80 "American terrorists" were killed in attacks involving 15 missiles Tehran launched on US targets in Iraq, adding that none of the missiles were intercepted."

Read more at:
Here is all you should know about Iran's attack on two American base in Iraq

Here is all you should know about Iran's attack on two American base in Iraq

The left, so dangerous. So insane.
 
Jul 2019
9,832
6,612
Georgia
The thing you're discounting is that the terrorist we killed was the leader of an even larger more dangerous organization paid and supported by the Iranian govt that has been conducting terrorist operations outside of Iran for many years and is responsible for the deaths of thousands. He was planning a series of attacks on US embassies and bases in Iraq and elsewhere. You can state that we shouldn't have done it because you didn't give permission for the attack till the cows come home but it falls on primarily deaf ears.
What makes your post disingenuous is that if virtually any Democrat been in the big chair and done this there would have been cheering from the left accompanied with high fives all round. There might well have been objections from the right as well and the scenario would have played out exactly the same way.
Read up on your hero.
how many Americans did he kill or have killed?

and the planned embassy attacks claim has been debunked, by trump's men.
 
Mar 2013
10,471
11,446
Middle Tennessee
Maybe the peace mission WAS the imminent danger?? Winky wink.

Ding ding ding ding ding we have a winner !!!

Iraq and Iran have been at each other’s throats for decades. Iran had ZERO influence inside Iraq until WE removed Saddam. We gave Iran their single greatest wish. The chance to spread their sectarian influence in Iraq. We’ve gone from those two countries at war with each other to the two of them openly meeting. That can’t be good for our interests what ever they may be.
 
Jul 2014
15,927
10,153
massachusetts
The "PWNED" is you.

Peace mission. :lol:
Peace mission is what the Iraqis called it.
The Iraqis were trying to broker a peace deal between the Saudis and the Iranians.
The Iraqis had passed a message from the Saudis to the Iranians, the General was scheduled to meet with the Iraqi premier to deliver the Iranian response. The Iraqis told the US that the General was coming , when he was arriving and why he was coming.
And the US told the Iraqis, that's great, and then they ambushed the general and assassinated him. That's why the Iraqis feel betrayed.

Why do you think he was there?
 
Jul 2019
9,832
6,612
Georgia
Ding ding ding ding ding we have a winner !!!

Iraq and Iran have been at each other’s throats for decades. Iran had ZERO influence inside Iraq until WE removed Saddam. We gave Iran their single greatest wish. The chance to spread their sectarian influence in Iraq. We’ve gone from those two countries at war with each other to the two of them openly meeting. That can’t be good for our interests what ever they may be.
Peace mission is what the Iraqis called it.
The Iraqis were trying to broker a peace deal between the Saudis and the Iranians.
The Iraqis had passed a message from the Saudis to the Iranians, the General was scheduled to meet with the Iraqi premier to deliver the Iranian response. The Iraqis told the US that the General was coming , when he was arriving and why he was coming.
And the US told the Iraqis, that's great, and then they ambushed the general and assassinated him. That's why the Iraqis feel betrayed.

Why do you think he was there?
when y'all put it like that
it sounds really bad
 
Feb 2018
2,344
1,618
Oregon
Hold on a sec here...I am used tou you making stuff up and creating neato imaginings but...Osama freakin' led a major terrorist org. that took out the twin towers and killed a bunch of my fellow citizens....AND BRAGGED ABOUT IT! The other guy supposedly planned or thought about possibly attacking an embassy or something, we really cannot know because the President says much that is false and never actually provides anything approaching hard data.
And Osama b L was not considered to be a top official or top figure of any sort in any country.
 
Jul 2014
15,927
10,153
massachusetts
Hold on a sec here...I am used tou you making stuff up and creating neato imaginings but...Osama freakin' led a major terrorist org. that took out the twin towers and killed a bunch of my fellow citizens....AND BRAGGED ABOUT IT! The other guy supposedly planned or thought about possibly attacking an embassy or something, we really cannot know because the President says much that is false and never actually provides anything approaching hard data.
No embassies were warned of imminent attacks.
If the administration had intelligence that suggested that an attack on an embassy was imminent, don't you think that even under Trump, someone would warn the embassy in question?
No embassies were warned, because there was no intelligence suggesting an attack was imminent. That i point one.
Point two is that the source of the information that an attack was imminent, is an administration that has a reputation for being less truthful than the North Korean News Agency.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tecoyah and Lyzza
Sep 2015
7,003
4,138
Stage Left
the very premise of this thread is bs, and laughably so... but believable for this joker... :rolleyes: :vomit:

the idea of comparing the two is pure insanity.