Blame Abortion On John Marshall’s Judicial Activism

[Flanders111]

This article is a bit too profound for an average bumpkin like me:

. . . I should note that as used here, the phrase “judicial activism” is the antonym of “originalism,” not the antonym of “judicial restraint.” It doesn’t mean an inclination (rather than a hesitancy) to overrule the actions of elected officials or the decisions of previous courts. Instead, activism means the interpretation of the Constitution, on questions where its original meaning is clear, in a sense deliberately contrary to that meaning so as to obtain a result favored by the judge.​

Madison v. Marshall
By Karl Spence
May 28th, 2018

https://amgreatness.com/2018/05/28/trump-offers-south-korea-a-backbone/​

As I understand it the SCOTUS starts by telling Americans they must eat ice cream well-knowing that lawmakers and bureaucrats will quickly tell Americans which flavor of ice cream they must eat. Example: The High Court decriminalized abortion well-knowing that taxpayers must pay for those abortions. That is how judicial activism works in Socialism’s America.

 

[GluteusMaximus]

This article is a bit too profound for an average bumpkin like me:

. . . I should note that as used here, the phrase “judicial activism” is the antonym of “originalism,” not the antonym of “judicial restraint.” It doesn’t mean an inclination (rather than a hesitancy) to overrule the actions of elected officials or the decisions of previous courts. Instead, activism means the interpretation of the Constitution, on questions where its original meaning is clear, in a sense deliberately contrary to that meaning so as to obtain a result favored by the judge.​

Madison v. Marshall
By Karl Spence
May 28th, 2018

https://amgreatness.com/2018/05/28/trump-offers-south-korea-a-backbone/​

As I understand it the SCOTUS starts by telling Americans they must eat ice cream well-knowing that lawmakers and bureaucrats will quickly tell Americans which flavor of ice cream they must eat. Example: The High Court decriminalized abortion well-knowing that taxpayers must pay for those abortions. That is how judicial activism works in Socialism’s America.

LOL, ridiculous rightwing tripe.

 

[Flanders111]

LOL, ridiculous rightwing tripe.

To GluteusMaximus: Another snappy retort from a baby butcher who cannot hear the screams.

A long time I asked myself what inhuman pain I would have felt while I was being torn apart had my mother aborted me. I still cry knowing that no one hears the screams of a fetus while it is being torn to pieces more methodically than animals tear apart a prey.

Incidentally, science gave us so much unnecessary brutality, the least scientists can do is find a way to record the screams of a fetus so liberals can hear them.

Thankfully, there is:

. . . a signal of true moral change, driven by people who increasingly understand that abortion is not solely a woman's choice, but rather, it is the denial of the right to life of the child within her.

Most importantly, it signifies an opportunity to save our national soul in regard to the now legal mass murder of the unborn – a soul we did not willingly give, but was stolen from us decades ago.​

May 29, 2018
As Ireland Aborts Its Soul, America Seems Poised to Salvage Its Own
By William Sullivan

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2018/05/as_ireland_aborts_its_soul_america_seems_poised_to_salvage_its_own.html
​

 

[GluteusMaximus]

To GluteusMaximus: Another snappy retort from a baby butcher who cannot hear the screams.

A long time I asked myself what inhuman pain I would have felt while I was being torn apart had my mother aborted me. I still cry knowing that no one hears the screams of a fetus while it is being torn to pieces more methodically than animals tear apart a prey.

Incidentally, science gave us so much unnecessary brutality, the least scientists can do is find a way to record the screams of a fetus so liberals can hear them.

Thankfully, there is:

. . . a signal of true moral change, driven by people who increasingly understand that abortion is not solely a woman's choice, but rather, it is the denial of the right to life of the child within her.

Most importantly, it signifies an opportunity to save our national soul in regard to the now legal mass murder of the unborn – a soul we did not willingly give, but was stolen from us decades ago.​

May 29, 2018
As Ireland Aborts Its Soul, America Seems Poised to Salvage Its Own
By William Sullivan

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2018/05/as_ireland_aborts_its_soul_america_seems_poised_to_salvage_its_own.html
​

You are an extremist who thinks women are just baby making machines. You want to FORCE women to have babies whether or not it's in their best interests. You have no problem using governmental power to force behavior that you think is desirable.

Since you are proclaiming your pseudo "religious" status, why don't you show me in the Bible where abortion is condemned? Why don't you offer a rebuttal on my thread that PROVES THE BIBLE IS PRO ABORTION?

You won't, because you can't defend your beliefs. You are not a true christian otherwise you'd know abortion isn't a "christian issue". Ipso facto, that makes you a "hypocrite", a phony christian on par with the evangelical Republicans in the USA.

I commend Ireland for throwing off the shackles of the backward Catholic Church. No doubt the Church will miss all the money it made confiscating babies from unwed mothers and selling them to desperate childless couples.

 

[Flanders111]

As I understand it the SCOTUS starts by telling Americans they must eat ice cream well-knowing that lawmakers and bureaucrats will quickly tell Americans which flavor of ice cream they must eat. Example: The High Court decriminalized abortion well-knowing that taxpayers must pay for those abortions. That is how judicial activism works in Socialism’s America.

Socialists/Communists love judicial activism when it works for them. Baby butchers will go out of their minds if judicial activism comes down on the side of the angels in this ruling:

“It’s quite possible that the request has provoked dueling opinions from across the bench that are not just dueling in substance, but whether the Supreme Court should be addressing it in the first place,” said Steve Vladeck, a professor at the University of Texas at Austin School of Law, who argued a case before the justices earlier in the term.​

Delayed abortion case fuels intrigue at Supreme Court
By Lydia Wheeler - 06/03/18 06:00 AM EDT

http://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/390325-delayed-abortion-case-fuels-intrigue-at-supreme-court​

 

[goober]

This article is a bit too profound for an average bumpkin like me:

. . . I should note that as used here, the phrase “judicial activism” is the antonym of “originalism,” not the antonym of “judicial restraint.” It doesn’t mean an inclination (rather than a hesitancy) to overrule the actions of elected officials or the decisions of previous courts. Instead, activism means the interpretation of the Constitution, on questions where its original meaning is clear, in a sense deliberately contrary to that meaning so as to obtain a result favored by the judge.​

Madison v. Marshall
By Karl Spence
May 28th, 2018

https://amgreatness.com/2018/05/28/trump-offers-south-korea-a-backbone/​

As I understand it the SCOTUS starts by telling Americans they must eat ice cream well-knowing that lawmakers and bureaucrats will quickly tell Americans which flavor of ice cream they must eat. Example: The High Court decriminalized abortion well-knowing that taxpayers must pay for those abortions. That is how judicial activism works in Socialism’s America.

That article can be summed up as "nonsense aimed at morons".

If you weren't a moron, you'd figure it out.

hint: linking to an article on Trump and Korea to bolster an abortion argument solidifies your moron cred.....