BOMBSHELL: Google Insider Turns Over 950 Pages Of Docs And Laptop To DOJ

Apr 2019
1,487
185
America
#32
the one I remember best is when he tried to set up WaPo to help diddler Roy Moore. WaPo didn't take the bait.

James O'Keefe on the defensive after failed anti-Post plot

Florida banned him from fundraising there

https://www.washingtonpost.com/inve...e7-a841-2066faf731ef_story.html?noredirect=on

here are a few more fails

ACORN Foe James O'Keefe Sought to Embarrass CNN's Abbie Boudreau on Porn-Strewn "Palace of Pleasure" Boat

Handling of Mary Landrieu office caper case called 'very unusual'

James O'Keefe and friends plead guilty in Mary Landrieu office caper

a few more here

on the credibility scale, the guy is just slightly above that Jacob Wohl turd

edit: Lloyd beat me to it, but by now you should get the point.
A bunch of nonsense does not change the fact the DOJ is looking into Google. Does it?
 
Nov 2005
8,807
3,299
California
#33
Probably won't get to much attention on MSM.
The ethics of the Left is on display. No ethics at all.
BOMBSHELL: Google Insider Turns Over 950 Pages Of Docs And Laptop To DOJ – True Pundit
(dull)
Based on what CRIMINAL ALLEGATION???

The DOJ doesn't investigate "ethics".
They investigate violation of the existing law.
What ACTUAL PIECE OF LEGISLATION is Google alleged to have broken?


It is not crap. The DOJ is in possession of the information given to them, or do you deny that? As far as ethics the Left has none and prove it daily.
"Do we deny that"???
There is no independent corroboration of this story in any way.

All we really have is Project Veritas (a group repeatedly busted for lies) throwing out claims.

There is no need to "deny" something that has never actually been "proven" in the first place.
 
Likes: se7en
Apr 2019
1,487
185
America
#33
(dull)
Based on what CRIMINAL ALLEGATION???

The DOJ doesn't investigate "ethics".
They investigate violation of the existing law.
What ACTUAL PIECE OF LEGISLATION is Google alleged to have broken?
Ask the DOJ. They are investigating. They will let us know.
 
Nov 2005
8,807
3,299
California
#34
Ask the DOJ. They are investigating.
You are hilarious.
YOU ARE THE ONE PROCLAIMING THIS IS HAPPENING
YOU are the one claiming that the DOJ is investigating Google.

Yet when you can't answer even simple questions on your claims (i.e. what crime is the DOJ actually investigating), you demand others do the work for you???
:rolleyes:
 
Likes: BitterPill
Jul 2008
18,823
12,633
Virginia Beach, VA
#35
No, I am not, but they (my side) do not control the internet. Plus they are actually ethical.
I think there is a physical law that prohibits implying that Trump is ethical. You may have done irreparable harm to the space-time continuum
 
Apr 2019
1,487
185
America
#36
You are hilarious.
YOU ARE THE ONE PROCLAIMING THIS IS HAPPENING
YOU are the one claiming that the DOJ is investigating Google.

Yet when you can't answer even simple questions on your claims (i.e. what crime is the DOJ actually investigating), you demand others do the work for you???
:rolleyes:
It is happening. I do not have to prove that, it is obvious. I do not care if you find out or not.
 
Apr 2019
1,487
185
America
#38
Current Google Engineer: Big Tech Has Merged with Democrat Party to Sway Political Elections
“I don’t have a smoking gun,” he told Veritas founder James O’Keefe. “I’ve been coding since I was ten, I have a PHD, I have five years experience at Google and I just know how algorithms are. They don’t write themselves. We write them to do what we want them to do,” he explained. “I look at search and I look at Google News, and I see what it’s doing.”
Censorship is not ethical.
 
Nov 2005
8,807
3,299
California
#39
It is happening. I do not have to prove that, it is obvious. I do not care if you find out or not.
When people claim something is "obvious" (especially when common sense demonstrates the claim is dubious), that's typically a sign that the speaker is full of crap.

Even more stupid regarding your claim is this simple fact.
You have shown absolutely nothing regarding the DoJ's actual actions.
All you have done is shown somebody claiming they SENT the DoJ stuff.
You have no information on what the DoJ has done with that. Moreover, as I pointed out, there is nothing they should do if the only charge is that they are not keeping with somebody's claims of "ethical".
The DoJ is not in charge of "ethical". They investigate violation of passed legislation. Not "ethical".


The Democrats ripped that fabric a long time ago. Trump is completely transparent, that is ethical.
The guy who refuses to show his tax returns is somebody you claim is "completely transparent".
:rolleyes:


Again, violating your personal definition of "ethical" does not justify a DoJ investigation.
 
Likes: BitterPill
Apr 2019
1,487
185
America
#40
When people claim something is "obvious" (especially when common sense demonstrates the claim is dubious), that's typically a sign that the speaker is full of crap.

Even more stupid regarding your claim is this simple fact.
You have shown absolutely nothing regarding the DoJ's actual actions.
All you have done is shown somebody claiming they SENT the DoJ stuff.
You have no information on what the DoJ has done with that. Moreover, as I pointed out, there is nothing they should do if the only charge is that they are not keeping with somebody's claims of "ethical".
The DoJ is not in charge of "ethical". They investigate violation of passed legislation. Not "ethical".



The guy who refuses to show his tax returns is somebody you claim is "completely transparent".
:rolleyes:



Again, violating your personal definition of "ethical" does not justify a DoJ investigation.
Again, violating your personal definition of "ethical" does not justify a DoJ investigation.
Show me where I said it did? Good luck.
 
Last edited: